XML 26 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Notes)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value Estimates
The fair value estimates of the following financial instruments have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, and trade payables approximate the fair values of those instruments due to the short-term nature of the instruments. The fair value of receivables on preneed contracts are impracticable to estimate because of the lack of a trading market and the diverse number of individual contracts with varying terms.
The fair value of our debt instruments at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was as follows:
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
(In thousands)
7.625% Senior Notes due October 2018
$
264,375

 
$
272,353

4.5% Senior Notes due November 2020
202,750

 
205,000

8.0% Senior Notes due November 2021
177,563

 
175,500

5.375% Senior Notes due January 2022
436,726

 
444,614

5.375% Senior Notes due May 2024
907,205

 
884,000

7.5% Senior Notes due April 2027
240,200

 
231,590

Term Loan due March 2021
647,500

 
673,750

Bank Credit Facility due March 2021
470,000

 
350,000

Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
6,134

 
3,753

Total fair value of debt instruments
$
3,352,453

 
$
3,240,560


The fair value of our long-term, fixed-rate loans were estimated using market prices for those loans, and therefore they are classified within Level 2 of the fair value measurements hierarchy. The Term Loan, Bank Credit Facility agreement, and the mortgage and other debt are classified within Level 3 of the fair value measurements hierarchy. The fair value of these instruments has been estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on our incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing arrangements. An increase (decrease) in the inputs results in a directionally opposite change in the fair value of the instruments.