XML 26 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of presentation

– BASIS OF PRESENTATION

In management’s opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim period reporting, reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the results of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, and the statements of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.  The operating results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2018 or any future interim period.  The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017 has been derived from the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 2, 2018.  The unaudited consolidated financial statements for March 31, 2018 and 2017, the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017, and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto that are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, The Bank of Glen Burnie and GBB Properties.  Consolidation resulted in the elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions.

Cash Flow Presentation

Cash Flow Presentation

 

In the statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB Atlanta”) overnight deposits, and federal funds sold.  Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

Certain items in the 2017 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2018 classifications.  The reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations or retained earnings.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.  Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include the determination of the allowance for loan losses (the “allowance”); the fair value of financial instruments, such as loans and investment securities; benefit plan obligations and expenses; and the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The FASB has issued several exposure drafts which, if adopted, would significantly alter the Company’s (and all other financial institutions’) method of accounting for, and reporting, its financial assets and some liabilities from a historical cost method to a fair value method of accounting as well as the reported amount of net interest income.  The Company has not determined the extent of the possible changes at this time.  The exposure drafts are in different stages of review, approval and possible adoption.

ASU 2014‑09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).”  ASU 2014‑09 implements a common revenue standard that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue.  The core principle of ASU 2014‑09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:  (i)  identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii)  identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii)  determine the transaction price, (iv)  allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (v)  recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.  ASU 2014‑09 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2016‑1, “No. 2016‑01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825‑10):  Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.”  ASU 2016-01 is intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments by requiring equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; requiring public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requiring separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; eliminating the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured and amortized at cost on the balance sheet; and requiring a reporting organization to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the organization has elected to measure the liability at fair value in a accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments.  ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017.  The amendments should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.  The amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values (including disclosure requirements) should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption.  The Company adopted ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statement.  The Bank’s equity securities are membership stocks in the Federal Home Loan Bank and Maryland Financial Bank and thereby excluded from fair value pricing.  For exit pricing on loans, the Company used data on recent originations which captured expectations of the credit risk “premium” and an analysis of prepayments which captures the Company’s historical prepayment experience.

ASU 2016‑02 “Leases (Topic 842).”  ASU 2016‑02 will, among other things, require lessees to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.  ASU 2016‑02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.”  ASU 2016‑2 will be effective for us on January 1, 2019 and will require transition using a modified retrospective approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements.  The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of ASU 2016‑02 on our financial statements.

ASU 2016‑05 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships.”  ASU 2016‑05 clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under ASC Topic 815 does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.  ASU 2016‑05 was effective for us on January 1, 2017 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2016‑09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718):  Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.”  Under ASU 2016‑09 all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to share-based payment awards should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement during the period in which they occur.  Previously, such amounts were recorded in the pool of excess tax benefits included in additional paid-in capital, if such pool was available.  Because excess tax benefits are no longer recognized in additional paid-in capital, the assumed proceeds from applying the treasury stock method when computing earnings per share should exclude the amount of excess tax benefits that would have previously been recognized in additional paid-in capital.  Additionally, excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity rather than a financing activity, as was previously the case.  ASU 2016‑09 also provides that an entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (current GAAP) or account for forfeitures when they occur.  ASU 2016‑09 changes the threshold to qualify for equity classification (rather than as a liability) to permit withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rates (rather than the minimum as was previously the case) in the applicable jurisdictions.  ASU 016‑09 was effective on January 1, 2017 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU No. 2016‑13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” which updated guidance intended to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date.  The updated guidance replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires the consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates.  The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016‑15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):  Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016‑15”).  This Accounting Standards Update addresses the following eight specific cash flow issues:  Debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies (COLIs) (including bank-owned life insurance policies (BOLIs)); distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.  ASU 2016‑15 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2016‑18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash.”  ASU 2016‑18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.  Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.  ASU 2016‑18 was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2017‑01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business.”  ASU 2017‑01 clarifies the definition and provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities constitutes a business.  ASU 2017‑01 is intended to provide guidance when evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses.  ASU 2017‑01 was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2017‑08, “Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.”  This ASU shortens the amortization period for the premium on certain purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date.  Today, entities generally amortize the premium over the contractual life of the security.  The new guidance does not change the accounting for purchased callable debt securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity.  ASU No. 2017‑08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted.  The guidance calls for a modified retrospective transition approach under which a cumulative-effect adjustment will be made to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted.  The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):  Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.  This standard better aligns an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results.  To meet that objective, the amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedge instruments and the hedged item in the financial statements.  Adoption for this ASU is required for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted.  The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220):  Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  The amendments in this ASU allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  The ASU does not have any impact on the underlying ASC 740 guidance that requires the effect of a change in tax law be included in income from continuing operations.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted and should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized.  The Company adopted the guidance in the ASU in its December 31, 2017 consolidated financial statements resulting in a reclassification of $0.1 million of stranded tax effects related to net unrealized losses on investment securities.  The impact was not material.