XML 78 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2013
Fair Value Measurements

7. Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s estimates of fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework is based on the inputs used in the valuation, gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are listed below:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets in inactive markets.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The Company’s financial instruments held at fair value are presented below as of October 31, 2013, and January 31, 2013:

Fair Value Measurements

(in thousands)

Carrying Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

October 31, 2013

Financial Assets:

Restricted deposits held at fair value

$ 2,869 $ 2,869 $ $

Preferred units of SolmeteX, LLC

$ 455 $ $ $ 455

January 31, 2013

Financial Assets:

Restricted deposits held at fair value

$ 2,861 $ 2,861 $ $

Financial Liabilities:

Contingent earnout of acquired businesses(1)

$ $ $ $

(1) The fair value of the contingent earnout of acquired businesses was determined using a mark-to-market modeling technique based on significant unobservable inputs calculated using a discounted future cash flows approach. Key assumptions include a discount rate of 41.2% and annual revenues of acquired businesses ranging from $1.5 million to $6.1 million over the life of the earnout. On July 31, 2012, the contingent earnout was reassessed and, based on our estimates of the likelihood of future revenues subject to the earnout provisions, assigned no value. Our conclusions have not changed since that time.

Other Financial Instruments

The Company uses the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value disclosures for its other financial instruments:

Cash – The carrying amounts that the Company has reported in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash approximate their fair values and are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

Short-term and long-term debt – The fair value of debt instruments is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and is valued using a market approach based on quoted prices for similar instruments traded in active markets. Where quoted prices are not available, the income approach is used to value these instruments based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at estimated borrowing rates for similar debt instruments or on estimated prices based on current yields for debt issues of similar quality and terms.