N-CSR

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT 

INVESTMENT COMPANIES 

Investment Company Act file number 811-6642 

DREYFUS CONNECTICUT INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND 

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)

c/o The Dreyfus Corporation 

200 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10166 

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) 

Mark N. Jacobs, Esq. 

200 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10166 

(Name and address of agent for service) 

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 922-6000 

Date of fiscal year end:	3/31
Date of reporting period:	9/30/06

FORM N-CSR

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.

The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.

Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value

	Contents
	THE FUND
2	Letter from the Chairman
3	Discussion of Fund Performance
6	Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses
6	Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses
	With Those of Other Funds
7	Statement of Investments
15	Statement of Assets and Liabilities
16	Statement of Operations
17	Statement of Changes in Net Assets
18	Financial Highlights
19	Notes to Financial Statements
25	Information About the Review and Approval
	of the Fund’s Management Agreement
	FOR MORE INFORMATION
	Back Cover

The  Fund 

Dreyfus Connecticut 

Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund 

LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN

Dear Shareholder:

We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, covering the six-month period from April 1, 2006, through September 30, 2006.

After more than two years of steady and gradual increases, the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) held short-term interest rates unchanged at its meetings in August and September.The Fed has indicated that the U.S. economy has moved to a slower-growth phase of its cycle, as evidenced by softening housing markets in many regions of the United States.Yet, energy prices have moderated from record highs, calming fears that the economy may fall into a full-blown recession.

Most sectors of the U.S. fixed-income market rallied in anticipation of and in response to the pause in the Fed’s tightening campaign, including municipal bonds. Investors apparently are optimistic that higher borrowing costs and moderating home values may wring current inflationary pressures from the economy. In addition, most states and municipalities have continued to report higher-than-expected tax receipts as a result of the recovering economy, helping to support the credit quality of many municipal bond issuers. As always, we encourage you to talk with your financial advisor about these and other developments to help ensure that your portfolio remains aligned with your current tax-managed needs and future investment goals.

For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the fund’s portfolio manager.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support.

2

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

James Welch, Portfolio Manager

How did Dreyfus Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund perform relative to its benchmark?

For the six-month period ended September 30, 2006, the fund achieved a total return of 2.84% .¹ In comparison, the Lehman Brothers 7-Year Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark index, achieved a total return of 3.39% for the same period.² In addition, the average total return for all funds reported in the Lipper Other States Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds category was 2.81% ..³

Despite rising interest rates and heightened market volatility early in the reporting period, municipal bonds rallied over the summer of 2006 as signs of an economic slowdown eased investors’ inflation concerns and the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) paused in its tightening campaign. The fund’s return was roughly in line with its Lipper category average but lagged the benchmark, primarily due to fund fees and expenses that are not reflected in the Index’s performance.

What is the fund’s investment approach?

The fund seeks as high a level of income exempt from federal and Connecticut state income taxes as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds that provide income exempt from federal and Connecticut state personal income taxes.The dollar-weighted average maturity of the fund’s portfolio ranges between three and 10 years.

We may buy and sell bonds based on credit quality, market outlook and yield potential. In selecting municipal bonds for investment, we may assess the current interest-rate environment and the municipal bond’s potential volatility in different rate environments.We focus on bonds with the potential to offer attractive current income, typically

The Fund 3

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)

looking for bonds that can provide consistently attractive current yields or that are trading at competitive market prices.A portion of the fund’s assets may be allocated to “discount” bonds, which are bonds that sell at a price below their face value, or to “premium” bonds, which are bonds that sell at a price above their face value.The fund’s allocation to either discount bonds or to premium bonds will change along with our changing views of the current interest-rate and market environment.We also may look to select bonds that are most likely to obtain attractive prices when sold.

What other factors influenced the fund’s performance?

Robust economic growth and mounting inflationary pressures sparked renewed inflation-related concerns in the opening weeks of the reporting period, and hawkish comments from some Fed members led investors to revise upward their expectations for short-term interest rates. As a result, the municipal bond market experienced a bout of heightened volatility in the spring.

Market conditions subsequently improved, however, when a softening housing market, declining fuel prices and moderating employment gains convinced investors that their inflation fears were overblown. The Fed appeared to confirm this view when it held short-term interest rates steady at its meetings in August and September, its first pause after more than two years of steady rate hikes. Municipal bonds rallied as investors first anticipated and then reacted to the Fed’s August announcement. The rally was particularly pronounced at the longer end of its maturity range, causing yield differences between shorter- and longer-term securities to narrow toward historically low levels.

In addition, municipal bond prices were supported by supply-and-demand influences. Like many other states, Connecticut has taken in more tax revenue than originally projected, enhancing its fiscal condition and reducing its need to borrow.Yet, even as the supply of newly issued municipal bonds fell compared to the same period one year ago, investor demand remained robust from individuals and institutions seeking competitive levels of tax-exempt income.

4

The fund benefited during the summertime rally from its emphasis on securities with maturities toward the upper end of the intermediate-term range. However, the fund also maintained a higher-quality credit profile than the Index, which prevented it from participating fully in strength among lower-rated credits.

What is the fund’s current strategy?

Recent economic data have continued to indicate that U.S. economic growth is moderating with relatively little risk of recession, and the Fed currently seems unlikely either to raise or lower short-term interest rates over the foreseeable future.Therefore, we have begun to lengthen the fund’s average duration in an attempt to lock in today’s yields for a slightly longer time. In addition, because lower-rated credits appear to be fully valued, we have maintained the fund’s high-quality credit profile. In our view, these are prudent strategies in today’s changing market environment.

October 16, 2006

1	Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid. Past performance is no
	guarantee of future results. Share price, yield and investment return fluctuate such that upon
	redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Income may be subject
	to state and local taxes for non-Connecticut residents, and some income may be subject to the
	federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) for certain investors. Capital gains, if any, are fully
	taxable. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus
	Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect that may be extended, terminated or modified at
	any time. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s return would have been lower.
2	SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital
	gain distributions.The Lehman Brothers 7-Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged total
	return performance benchmark for the investment-grade, geographically unrestricted 7-year tax-
	exempt bond market, consisting of municipal bonds with maturities of 6-8 years. Index returns do
	not reflect the fees and expenses associated with operating a mutual fund.
3	Source: Lipper Inc.

The Fund 5

UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)

As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.

Review your fund’s expenses

The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund from April 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming actual returns for the six months ended September 30, 2006

Expenses paid per $1,000 †	$ 3.86
Ending value (after expenses)	$1,028.40

COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)

Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended September 30, 2006

Expenses paid per $1,000 †	$ 3.85
Ending value (after expenses)	$1,021.26

^† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .76%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

6

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
September 30, 2006 (Unaudited)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments—98.3%	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Connecticut—71.6%
Connecticut	5.75	6/15/10	30,000 a	32,247
Connecticut	5.25	12/15/10	50,000	53,307
Connecticut	6.56	12/15/10	1,250,000 b,c	1,415,337
Connecticut	7.56	6/15/11	1,500,000 b,c	1,724,700
Connecticut	5.13	11/15/13	1,500,000	1,604,730
Connecticut
(Insured; MBIA)	5.25	3/15/10	5,100,000	5,269,269
Connecticut
(Insured; MBIA)	5.38	12/15/10	4,100,000	4,394,380
Connecticut
(Insured; MBIA)	5.25	10/15/22	1,600,000	1,745,280
Connecticut,
Airport Revenue (Bradley
International Airport)
(Insured; FGIC)	5.25	10/1/17	2,275,000	2,397,213
Connecticut,
Special Tax Obligation
(Transportation
Infrastructure Purposes)	5.25	9/1/07	1,115,000	1,132,806
Connecticut,
Special Tax Obligation
(Transportation
Infrastructure Purposes)	5.38	9/1/08	2,500,000	2,587,175
Connecticut,
Special Tax Obligation
(Transportation Infrastructure
Purposes) (Insured; AMBAC)	5.25	7/1/19	3,000,000	3,423,270
Connecticut,
Special Tax Obligation
(Transportation Infrastructure
Purposes) (Insured; FSA)	5.50	11/1/12	4,180,000	4,612,546
Connecticut,
Special Tax Obligation
(Transportation Infrastructure
Purposes) (Insured; FSA)	5.38	7/1/13	1,000,000	1,093,100
Connecticut,
Special Tax Obligation
(Transportation Infrastructure
Purposes) (Insured; MBIA)	5.25	9/1/07	1,360,000	1,381,842

The Fund 7

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Connecticut (continued)
Connecticut Development Authority,
First Mortgage Gross Revenue
(Church Homes, Inc. Congregational
Avery Heights Project)	5.70	4/1/12	1,990,000	2,039,511
Connecticut Development Authority,
First Mortgage Gross Revenue
(The Elim Park Baptist
Home Inc. Project)	5.38	12/1/11	1,765,000	1,787,963
Connecticut Development Authority,
Revenue (Duncaster Project)
(Insured; Radian)	5.50	8/1/11	2,405,000	2,577,655
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Children’s Medical Center)
(Insured; MBIA)	5.00	7/1/21	1,045,000	1,115,109
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Griffin Hospital Issue)
(Insured; Radian)	5.00	7/1/23	1,280,000	1,347,098
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Hospital for Special Care)	5.13	7/1/07	400,000	401,116
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Loomis Chaffee School Issue)
(Insured; AMBAC)	5.25	7/1/28	1,760,000	2,039,664
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Nursing Home Program-3030
Park Fairfield Health Center)	6.25	11/1/21	2,500,000	2,554,325
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Stamford Hospital) (Insured; MBIA)	5.20	7/1/07	2,210,000	2,237,559
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Trinity College Issue)
(Insured; MBIA)	5.00	7/1/22	1,000,000	1,069,840
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(University of Hartford Issue)
(Insured; Radian)	5.00	7/1/17	1,220,000	1,312,049

8

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Connecticut (continued)
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(University of Hartford Issue)
(Insured; Radian)	5.50	7/1/22	2,000,000	2,178,900
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Windham Community Memorial
Hospital) (Insured; ACA)	5.75	7/1/11	530,000	542,911
Connecticut Health and Educational
Facilities Authority, Revenue
(Yale-New Haven Hospital
Issue) (Insured; AMBAC)	5.00	7/1/25	1,500,000	1,603,200
Connecticut Higher Education
Supplemental Loan Authority,
Revenue (Family Education
Loan Program)	5.50	11/15/06	640,000 a	653,869
Connecticut Higher Education
Supplemental Loan Authority,
Revenue (Family Education
Loan Program)	5.60	11/15/06	685,000 a	699,926
Connecticut Higher Education
Supplemental Loan Authority,
Revenue (Family Education Loan
Program) (Insured; AMBAC)	5.63	11/15/11	415,000	416,818
Connecticut Higher Education
Supplemental Loan Authority,
Senior Revenue (Connecticut
Family Education Loan Program)
(Insured; MBIA)	4.50	11/15/20	1,955,000	1,973,885
Connecticut Housing Finance
Authority (Housing Mortgage
Finance Program)	4.45	5/15/14	1,000,000	1,011,020
Connecticut Housing Finance
Authority (Housing Mortgage
Finance Program)	5.00	11/15/21	3,290,000	3,418,113
Connecticut Housing Finance
Authority (Housing Mortgage
Finance Program)	4.65	11/15/27	1,380,000	1,410,802
Connecticut Resources Recovery
Authority, Mid-Connecticut
System Subordinated Revenue	5.50	11/15/10	1,000,000 a	1,069,260

The Fund 9

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
Connecticut (continued)
Connecticut Resources Recovery
Authority, RRR (American
Ref-Fuel Co. of Southeastern
Connecticut Project)	5.50	11/15/15	3,250,000	3,350,652
Fairfield	5.50	4/1/11	2,030,000	2,198,754
Greater New Haven Water Pollution
Control Authority, Regional
Wastewater System Revenue
(Insured; MBIA)	5.00	11/15/25	1,335,000	1,427,235
Greenwich Housing Authority,
MFHR (Greenwich Close
Apartments)	6.25	9/1/17	2,000,000	2,089,040
Hamden
(Insured; MBIA)	5.25	8/15/11	265,000 a	289,968
Hamden
(Insured; MBIA)	5.25	8/15/14	730,000	796,021
Hamden
(Insured; MBIA)	5.25	8/15/14	5,000	5,550
Hartford,
Parking System Revenue	6.40	7/1/10	1,000,000 a	1,096,690
Meriden,
GO (Insured; MBIA)	5.00	8/1/16	2,090,000	2,298,331
Middletown	5.00	4/15/08	1,760,000	1,801,061
New Haven,
Air Rights Parking Facility
Revenue (Insured; AMBAC)	5.38	12/1/11	1,165,000	1,263,338
University of Connecticut
(Insured; FGIC)	5.75	3/1/10	1,850,000 a	1,999,831
University of Connecticut
(Insured; FSA)	5.00	2/15/24	1,225,000	1,310,076
University of Connecticut,
GO (Insured; FGIC)	5.00	2/15/24	2,100,000	2,260,230
Waterbury,
GO Tax Revenue (Special Capital
Reserve Fund) (Insured; FSA)	5.00	4/1/13	1,000,000	1,078,150
Weston	5.25	7/15/15	1,000,000 a	1,112,220
Westport	5.00	8/15/16	1,500,000	1,638,120
Westport	5.00	8/15/17	2,000,000	2,179,060

10

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
U.S. Related—26.7%
Children’s Trust Fund of Puerto
Rico, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Bonds	5.75	7/1/10	1,500,000 a	1,615,260
Children’s Trust Fund of Puerto
Rico, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Bonds	5.75	7/1/10	1,300,000 a	1,399,892
Children’s Trust Fund of Puerto
Rico, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Bonds	5.75	7/1/10	4,000,000 a	4,307,360
Guam Economic Development
Authority, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Bonds	0/5.20	05/15/12	795,000 d	776,445
Guam Economic Development
Authority, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Bonds	0/5.45	05/15/16	1,445,000 d	1,403,789
Guam Economic Development
Authority, Tobacco Settlement
Asset-Backed Bonds	5.00	5/15/22	170,000	172,358
Guam Waterworks Authority,
Water and Wastewater
System Revenue	5.50	7/1/16	1,000,000	1,066,040
Puerto Rico Commonwealth,
Public Improvement	5.25	7/1/25	1,500,000	1,618,050
Puerto Rico Commonwealth,
Public Improvement
(Insured; FGIC)	5.50	7/1/16	3,270,000	3,723,712
Puerto Rico Commonwealth,
Public Improvement (Insured; FSA)	5.25	7/1/12	2,600,000	2,824,588
Puerto Rico Commonwealth,
Public Improvement
(Insured; MBIA)	5.25	7/1/14	1,000,000	1,105,390
Puerto Rico Electric Power
Authority, Power Revenue	5.00	7/1/11	3,000,000	3,153,090
Puerto Rico Electric Power
Authority, Power Revenue
(Insured; MBIA)	6.13	7/1/09	4,000,000	4,271,640
Puerto Rico Government
Development Bank, Senior Notes	5.00	12/1/14	2,000,000	2,141,740

The Fund 11

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Long-Term Municipal	Coupon	Maturity	Principal
Investments (continued)	Rate (%)	Date	Amount ($)	Value ($)
U.S. Related (continued)
Virgin Islands Public Finance
Authority, Revenue, Virgin
Islands Gross Receipts
Taxes Loan Note	5.63	10/1/10	820,000	842,944
Virgin Islands Public Finance
Authority, Revenue, Virgin
Islands Gross Receipts
Taxes Loan Note	6.38	10/1/19	3,000,000	3,302,700
Virgin Islands Public Finance
Authority, Revenue, Virgin
Islands Matching Loan Notes	5.50	10/1/08	1,500,000	1,548,060
Total Investments (cost $125,618,975)			98.3%	129,795,180
Cash and Receivables (Net)			1.7%	2,294,981
Net Assets			100.0%	132,090,161

^a These securities are prerefunded; the date shown represents the prerefunded date. Bonds which are prerefunded are 

collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used to pay principal and interest on 

the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. 

^b Inverse floater security—the interest rate is subject to change periodically. 

^c Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in 

transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At September 30, 2006, these 

securities amounted to $3,140,037 or 2.4% of net assets. 

^d Zero coupon until a specified date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective until maturity. 

12

Summary of Abbreviations
ACA	American Capital Access	AGC	ACE Guaranty Corporation
AGIC	Asset Guaranty Insurance	AMBAC	American Municipal Bond
	Company		Assurance Corporation
ARRN	Adjustable Rate Receipt Notes	BAN	Bond Anticipation Notes
BIGI	Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance	BPA	Bond Purchase Agreement
CGIC	Capital Guaranty Insurance	CIC	Continental Insurance
	Company		Company
CIFG	CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty	CMAC	Capital Market Assurance
			Corporation
COP	Certificate of Participation	CP	Commercial Paper
EDR	Economic Development Revenue	EIR	Environmental Improvement
			Revenue
FGIC	Financial Guaranty Insurance
	Company	FHA	Federal Housing Administration
FHLB	Federal Home Loan Bank	FHLMC	Federal Home Loan Mortgage
			Corporation
FNMA	Federal National
	Mortgage Association	FSA	Financial Security Assurance
GAN	Grant Anticipation Notes	GIC	Guaranteed Investment Contract
GNMA	Government National
	Mortgage Association	GO	General Obligation
HR	Hospital Revenue	IDB	Industrial Development Board
IDC	Industrial Development Corporation	IDR	Industrial Development Revenue
LOC	Letter of Credit	LOR	Limited Obligation Revenue
LR	Lease Revenue	MBIA	Municipal Bond Investors Assurance
			Insurance Corporation
MFHR	Multi-Family Housing Revenue	MFMR	Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue
PCR	Pollution Control Revenue	PILOT	Payment in Lieu of Taxes
RAC	Revenue Anticipation Certificates	RAN	Revenue Anticipation Notes
RAW	Revenue Anticipation Warrants	RRR	Resources Recovery Revenue
SAAN	State Aid Anticipation Notes	SBPA	Standby Bond Purchase Agreement
SFHR	Single Family Housing Revenue	SFMR	Single Family Mortgage Revenue
SONYMA	State of New York Mortgage Agency	SWDR	Solid Waste Disposal Revenue
TAN	Tax Anticipation Notes	TAW	Tax Anticipation Warrants
TRAN	Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes	XLCA	XL Capital Assurance

The Fund 13

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited)
Fitch		or Moody’s	or	Standard & Poor’s	Value (%) †
AAA		Aaa		AAA	61.4
AA		Aa		AA	16.7
A		A		A	2.9
BBB		Baa		BBB	16.3
BB		Ba		BB	1.1
Not Rated e		Not Rated e		Not Rated e	1.6
					100.0
†	Based on total investments.
e	Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to
	be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund may invest.
See notes to financial statements.

14

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES 

September 30, 2006 (Unaudited) 

	Cost	Value
Assets ($):
Investments in securities-See Statement of Investments	125,618,975	129,795,180
Interest receivable		1,768,498
Receivable for investment securities sold		1,110,412
Receivable for shares of Beneficial interest subscribed		428
Prepaid expenses		6,620
		132,681,138
Liabilities ($):
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b)		73,292
Cash overdraft due to Custodian		431,585
Payable for shares of Beneficial interest redeemed		49,104
Accrued expenses		36,996
		590,977
Net Assets ($)		132,090,161
Composition of Net Assets ($):
Paid-in capital		128,763,631
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net		24,390
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments		(874,065)
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) on investments		4,176,205
Net Assets ($)		132,090,161
Shares Outstanding
(unlimited number of $ .001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest authorized)		9,583,448
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share—Note 3(d) ($)		13.78

See notes to financial statements.

The Fund 15

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30, 2006 (Unaudited)

Investment Income ($):
Interest Income	3,084,846
Expenses:
Management fee—Note 3(a)	397,719
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(b)	58,457
Professional fees	24,021
Trusees’ fees and expenses—Note 3(c)	8,645
Custodian fees	7,166
Registration fees	5,890
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports	3,747
Loan commitment fees—Note 2	395
Miscellaneous	7,200
Total Expenses	513,240
Less—reduction in management fee
due to undertaking—Note 3(a)	(4,715)
Less—reduction in custody fees due to
earnings credits—Note 1(b)	(6,435)
Net Expenses	502,090
Investment Income—Net	2,582,756
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($):
Net realized gain (loss) on investments	(128,981)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	1,333,557
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments	1,204,576
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations	3,787,332

See notes to financial statements.

16

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

	Six Months Ended
	September 30, 2006	Year Ended
	(Unaudited)	March 31, 2006
Operations ($):
Investment income—net	2,582,756	5,222,809
Net realized gain (loss) on investments	(128,981)	(56,483)
Net unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) on investments	1,333,557	(1,823,668)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Resulting from Operations	3,787,332	3,342,658
Dividends to Shareholders from ($):
Investment income—net	(2,558,366)	(5,199,546)
Net realized gain on investments	—	(13,760)
Total Dividends	(2,558,366)	(5,213,306)
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($):
Net proceeds from shares sold	5,387,811	19,830,138
Dividends reinvested	1,839,839	3,839,427
Cost of shares redeemed	(10,113,845)	(27,238,609)
Increase( Decrease) in Net Assets
from Beneficial Interest Transactions	(2,886,195)	(3,569,044)
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets	(1,657,229)	(5,439,692)
Net Assets ($):
Beginning of Period	133,747,390	139,187,082
End of Period	132,090,161	133,747,390
Undistributed investment income—net	24,390	—
Capital Share Transactions (Shares):
Shares sold	395,282	1,432,280
Shares issued for dividends reinvested	134,752	277,015
Shares redeemed	(741,304)	(1,966,203)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding	(211,270)	(256,908)

See notes to financial statements.

The Fund 17

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.

	Six Months Ended
	September 30, 2006			Year Ended March 31,
		(Unaudited)	2006	2005	2004	2003	2002
Per Share Data ($):
Net asset value,
beginning of period		13.66	13.85	14.29	14.27	13.72	13.86
Investment Operations:
Investment income—net a		.27	.53	.53	.54	.57	.61
Net realized and unrealized
gain (loss) on investments		.11	(.20)	(.44)	.02	.56	(.15)
Total from Investment Operations		.38	.33	.09	.56	1.13	.46
Distributions:
Dividends from
investment income—net		(.26)	(.52)	(.53)	(.54)	(.58)	(.60)
Dividends from net realized
gain on investments		—	(.00)b	—	—	—	—
Total Distributions		(.26)	(.52)	(.53)	(.54)	(.58)	(.60)
Net asset value, end of period		13.78	13.66	13.85	14.29	14.27	13.72
Total Return (%)		2.84c	2.43	.63	4.02	8.31	3.44
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%):
Ratio of total expenses
to average net assets		.77d	.79	.78	.78	.78	.77
Ratio of net expenses
to average net assets		.76d	.78	.77	.78	.78	.77
Ratio of net investment income
to average net assets		3.90d	3.79	3.78	3.82	4.05	4.38
Portfolio Turnover Rate		18.03c	16.45	18.79	23.49	21.13	28.50
Net Assets, end of period
($ x 1,000)		132,090	133,747	139,187	152,290	158,581	138,003
a	Based on average shares outstanding at each month end.
b	Amount represents less than $.01 per share.
c	Not annualized.
d	Annualized.
See notes to financial statements.

18

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:

Dreyfus Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a non-diversified open-end management investment company.The fund’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income exempt from federal and Connecticut state income taxes as is consistent with the preservation of capital.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”) serves as the fund’s investment adviser. The Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation (“Mellon Financial”). Dreyfus Service Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.

The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.

(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the “Service”) approved by the Board of Trustees. Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are carried at fair value as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of municipal securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and

The Fund 19

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

general market conditions. Options and financial futures on municipal and U.S.Treasury securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such securities are primarily traded or at the last sales price on the national securities market on each business day.

(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gain and loss from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.

The fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby the fund receives earnings credits from the custodian when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.

The fund follows an investment policy of investing primarily in municipal obligations of one state. Economic changes affecting the state and certain of its public bodies and municipalities may affect the ability of issuers within the state to pay interest on, or repay principal of, municipal obligations held by the fund.

(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gain, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gain can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gain. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

20

(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date.At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $756,304 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to March 31, 2006. If not applied, $28,967 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2008, $276,703 expires in fiscal 2009, $244,622 expires in fiscal 2012 and $206,012 expires in fiscal 2013.

The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 were as follows: tax exempt income $5,199,546 and ordinary income $13,760.The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.

The Fund 21

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

NOTE 2—Bank Line of Credit:

The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $350 million redemption credit facility (the “Facility”) to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing. During the period ended September 30, 2006, the fund did not borrow under the Facility.

NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:

(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .60% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.The Manager had undertaken from April 1, 2006 through September 30, 2006 to reduce the management fee paid by the fund, to the extent that, the fund’s aggregate annual expenses, exclusive of taxes, brokerage fees, interest on borrowings, commitment fees and extraordinary expenses, exceed an annual rate of .80% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets.The reduction in management fee, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $4,715 during the period ended September 30, 2006.

(b) Under the fund’s Shareholder Services Plan, the fund reimburses the Distributor an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets for certain allocated expenses of providing personal services and/or maintaining shareholder accounts.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. During the period ended September 30, 2006, the fund was charged $30,015 pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.

22

The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended September 30, 2006, the fund was charged $17,871 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.

During the period ended September 30, 2006, the fund wad charged $2,274 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.

The components of Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $65,061, chief compliance officer fees $2,274 and transfer agency per account fees $5,957.

(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.

(d) A 1% redemption fee is charged and retained by the fund on certain shares redeemed within thirty days following the date of issuance, subject to exceptions, including redemptions made through the use of the fund’s exchange privilege. During the period ended September 30, 2006, redemption fees charged and retained by the fund amounted to $4.

NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:

The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended September 30, 2006, amounted to $23,481,756 and $23,593,657, respectively.

At September 30, 2006, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $4,176,205, consisting of $4,288,172 gross unrealized appreciation and $111,967 gross unrealized depreciation.

At September 30, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).

The Fund 23

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

NOTE 5—Subsequent Event:

At a meeting of the Board of Trustees of the fund held on November 8, 2006, the Board approved, subject to shareholder approval, an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”) between the fund and Dreyfus Premier State Municipal Bond Fund, Connecticut Series. (the “Acquiring Fund”).The Agreement provides for the transfer of the fund’s assets to the Acquiring Fund in a tax-free exchange for shares of the Acquiring Fund and the assumption by the Acquiring Fund of the fund’s stated liabilities, the distribution of shares of the Acquiring Fund to the fund’s shareholders and the subsequent termination of the fund (the “Reorganization”). It is currently contemplated that holders of fund shares as of December 15, 2006 will be asked to approve the Agreement on behalf of the fund at a special meeting of shareholders to be held on or about March 1, 2007.The Reorganization is expected to take place on or about March 6, 2007. In anticipation of the Reorganization, effective on or about November 17, 2006, the fund will be closed to any investments for new accounts.

24

INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL 

OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) 

At a Meeting of the fund’s Board of Trustees held on August 9, 2006, the Board considered the re-approval for an annual period of the fund’s Management Agreement, pursuant to which the Manager provides the fund with investment advisory and administrative services. The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of the Manager.

Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund. The Board members received a presentation from representatives of the Manager regarding services provided to the fund and other funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and discussed the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to the fund pursuant to the fund’s Management Agreement. The Manager’s representatives reviewed the fund’s distribution of accounts and the relationships that the Manager has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each. The Manager’s representatives noted the diversity of distribution of the fund as well as among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex generally, and the Manager’s corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services in each distribution channel. The Board also reviewed the number of shareholder accounts in the fund, as well as the fund’s asset size.

The Board members also considered the Manager’s research and portfolio management capabilities and that the Manager also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board members also considered the Manager’s extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructure.

Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Management Fee and Expense Ratio and Performance. The Board members reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc., an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing the fund’s management fee and expense ratio with a group of comparable funds (the “Expense

The Fund 25

I N FO R M AT I O N A B O U T T H E	R E V I E W A N D	A P P R OVA L	O F T H E
F U N D ’ S M A N A G E M E N T	A G R E E M E N T	( U n a u d i t e d )	( c o n t i n u e d )

Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”) that were selected by Lipper.The Expense Group contained one other fund. Included in the fund’s reports were comparisons of contractual and actual management fee rates and total operating expenses.

The Board members also reviewed the reports prepared by Lipper that presented the fund’s performance for various periods ended June 30, 2006, and placed significant emphasis on comparisons of yield and total return performance for the fund to the same group of funds as the fund’s Expense Group (the “Performance Group”) and to a group of funds that was broader than the fund’s Expense Universe (the “Performance Universe”) that also were selected by Lipper. The Manager furnished these reports to the Board along with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the fund’s Expense Group and Expense Universe, and Performance Group and Performance Universe.The Manager also provided a comparison of the fund’s total returns to the fund’s Lipper category average returns for the past 10 calendar years.

The Board reviewed the results of the Expense Group and Expense Universe comparisons for various periods ended June 30, 2006. The Board reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios of the funds in the Expense Group and Expense Universe, and noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was higher than the other Expense Group fund and the actual management fee and total expense ratio were higher than those of the other Expense Group fund and Expense Universe median.

With respect to the fund’s performance, the Board noted that the fund achieved total returns higher than the other Performance Group fund for each reported time period up to 5 years and higher than the Performance Universe median for each reported time period up to 10 years except for the 5-year period. On a yield performance basis, the Board noted that the fund’s 1-year yields were higher than those of the

26

other Performance Group fund and higher than the Performance Universe median for the 6 most recent 1-year periods of the 10 reported time periods.

Representatives of the Manager reviewed with the Board members the fees paid to the Manager or its affiliates by mutual funds managed by the Manager or its affiliates that were reported in the same Lipper category as the fund (the “Similar Funds”), and explained the nature of the Similar Funds and the differences, from the Manager’s perspective, in providing services to the Similar Funds as compared to the fund. The Manager’s representatives also reviewed the costs associated with distribution through intermediaries. The Board discussed the relationship of the management fees paid in light of the Manager’s performance, and the services provided.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Fund to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.The Manager’s representatives noted that there were no similarly managed separate accounts or wrap fee accounts managed by the Manager or its affiliates with similar investment objectives, policies, and strategies as the fund.

Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. The Manager’s representatives reviewed the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by the Manager for the fund and the method used to determine such expenses and profit. The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding the Manager’s approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus mutual fund complex. The Board members also had been informed that the methodology had also been reviewed by an independent registered public accounting firm which, like the consultant, found the methodology to be reasonable.The consulting firm also analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with

The Fund 27

I N FO R M AT I O N A B O U T T H E	R E V I E W A N D	A P P R OVA L	O F T H E
F U N D ’ S M A N A G E M E N T	A G R E E M E N T	( U n a u d i t e d )	( c o n t i n u e d )

the management of a fund. The Board members evaluated the profitability analysis in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund, including any decline in fund assets from the prior year, and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders.The Board members also considered potential benefits to the Manager from acting as investment adviser to the fund and noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements in effect with respect to trading the fund’s portfolio.

It was noted that the Board members should consider the Manager’s profitability with respect to the fund as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the Management Agreement bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by the Manager, including the nature, extent, and quality of such services and that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been decreasing, the possibility that the Manager may have realized any economies of scale would be less. It was noted that the profitability percentage for managing the fund was within ranges determined by appropriate court cases to be reasonable given the services rendered and the fund’s overall performance and generally superior service levels provided.

At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to continuation of the fund’s Management Agreement. Based on their discussions and considerations as described above, the fund’s Board made the following conclusions and determinations.

• The Board concluded that the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by the Manager to the fund are adequate and appropriate.
• The Board generally was satisfied with the fund’s performance.
• The Board concluded that the fee paid to the Manager by the fund was reasonable in light of the services provided, comparative perfor- mance and expense and management fee information, costs of the

28

• services provided and profits to be realized and benefits derived or to be derived by the Manager from its relationship with the fund.
• The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by the Manager in connection with the management fee rate charged to the fund, and that, to the extent in the future it were to be determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with a fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.

The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, along with the information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that re-approval of the fund’s Management Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.

The Fund 29

For More	Information
Dreyfus Connecticut	Transfer Agent &
Intermediate Municipal	Dividend Disbursing Agent
Bond Fund	Dreyfus Transfer, Inc.
200 Park Avenue	200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166	New York, NY 10166
Manager	Distributor
The Dreyfus Corporation	Dreyfus Service Corporation
200 Park Avenue	200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166	New York, NY 10166
Custodian
The Bank of New York
One Wall Street
New York, NY 10286
Telephone 1-800-645-6561

Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 

E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com 

Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.dreyfus.com 

The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund's Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-551-8090.

Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.

Item 2.	Code of Ethics.
	Not applicable.
Item 3.	Audit Committee Financial Expert.
	Not applicable.
Item 4.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
	Not applicable.
Item 5.	Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
	Not applicable.
Item 6.	Schedule of Investments.
	Not applicable.
Item 7.	Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management
	Investment Companies.
	Not applicable.
Item 8.	Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
	Not applicable.
Item 9.	Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies
	Affiliated Purchasers.
	Not applicable.
Item 10.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The Registrant has a Nominating Committee (the "Committee"), which is responsible for selecting and nominating persons for election or appointment by the Registrant's Board as Board members. The Committee has adopted a Nominating Committee Charter (the "Charter"). Pursuant to the Charter, the Committee will consider recommendations for nominees from shareholders submitted to the Secretary of the Registrant, c/o The Dreyfus Corporation Legal Department, 200 Park Avenue, 8th Floor East, New York, New York 10166. A nomination submission must include information regarding the recommended nominee as specified in the Charter. This information includes all information relating to a recommended nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxy statements for the election of Board members, as well as information sufficient to evaluate the factors to be considered by the Committee, including character and integrity, business and professional experience, and whether the person has the ability to apply sound and independent business judgment and would act in the interests of the Registrant and its shareholders.

Nomination submissions are required to be accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the shareholders, and such additional information must be provided regarding the recommended nominee as reasonably requested by the Committee.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1)	Not applicable.
(a)(2)	Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a)
under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3)	Not applicable.
(b)	Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b)
under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DREYFUS CONNECTICUT INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND

By:	/s/ Stephen E. Canter
	Stephen E. Canter
	President
Date:	November 28, 2006

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:	/s/ Stephen E. Canter
	Stephen E. Canter
	Chief Executive Officer
Date:	November 28, 2006
By:	/s/ James Windels
	James Windels
	Chief Financial Officer
Date:	November 28, 2006
EXHIBIT INDEX
	(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-
	2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT)
	(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-
	2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)

EX-99

EX-99

[EX-99.906CERT] Exhibit (b)

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this report on Form N-CSR for the Registrant as furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

By:	/s/ Stephen E. Canter
	Stephen E. Canter
	Chief Executive Officer
Date:	November 28, 2006
By:	/s/ James Windels
	James Windels
	Chief Financial Officer
Date:	November 28, 2006

This certificate is furnished pursuant to the requirements of Form N-CSR and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.