XML 36 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Deposits
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Banking and Thrift [Abstract]  
Deposits

Note 14.

Deposits

The table below presents the types and sources of the firm’s deposits.

 

$ in millions    

 

Savings and

Demand

  

  

     Time         Total   

As of September 2016

       

Private bank and online retail

    $57,700         $  3,755         $  61,455   
   

Brokered certificates of deposit

    —         38,812         38,812   
   

Deposit sweep programs

    15,900         —         15,900   
   

Institutional

    1         8,382         8,383   

Total

    $73,601         $50,949         $124,550   

 

As of December 2015

       

Private bank

    $38,715         $  2,354         $  41,069   
   

Brokered certificates of deposit

    —         32,419         32,419   
   

Deposit sweep programs

    15,791         —         15,791   
   

Institutional

    1         8,239         8,240   

Total

    $54,507         $43,012         $  97,519   

In April 2016, Goldman Sachs Bank USA (GS Bank USA) acquired GE Capital Bank’s online deposit platform and assumed $16.52 billion of deposits, consisting of $8.76 billion in online deposit accounts and certificates of deposit, and $7.76 billion in brokered certificates of deposit. In the table above:

 

•  

Substantially all deposits are interest-bearing.

 

•  

Savings and demand deposits have no stated maturity.

 

•  

Time deposits include $14.10 billion and $14.68 billion as of September 2016 and December 2015, respectively, of deposits accounted for at fair value under the fair value option. See Note 8 for further information about deposits accounted for at fair value.

 

•  

Time deposits have a weighted average maturity of approximately 2.5 years and 3 years as of September 2016 and December 2015, respectively.

 

•  

Deposit sweep programs represent long-term contractual agreements with several U.S. broker-dealers who sweep client cash to FDIC-insured deposits.

 

•  

Deposits insured by the FDIC as of September 2016 and December 2015 were approximately $72.26 billion and $55.48 billion, respectively.

The table below presents deposits held in U.S. and non-U.S. offices. Substantially all U.S. deposits were held at GS Bank USA and substantially all non-U.S. deposits were held at Goldman Sachs International Bank (GSIB).

 

    As of  
$ in millions    

 

September

2016

  

  

    

 

December

2015

  

  

U.S. offices

    $105,927         $81,920   
   

Non-U.S. offices

    18,623         15,599   

Total

    $124,550         $97,519   

The table below presents maturities of time deposits held in U.S. and non-U.S. offices.

 

    As of September 2016  
$ in millions     U.S.         Non-U.S.         Total   

Remainder of 2016

    $  4,007         $5,161         $  9,168   
   

2017

    10,148         4,268         14,416   
   

2018

    6,016         68         6,084   
   

2019

    5,409         —         5,409   
   

2020

    4,152         —         4,152   
   

2021

    3,551         41         3,592   
   

2022 - thereafter

    7,928         200         8,128   

Total

    $41,211         $9,738         $50,949   

As of September 2016, deposits in U.S. and non-U.S. offices include $1.54 billion and $8.35 billion, respectively, of deposits that were greater than $250,000.

The firm’s savings and demand deposits were recorded based on the amount of cash received plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value. In addition, the firm designates certain derivatives as fair value hedges to convert a majority of its time deposits not accounted for at fair value from fixed-rate obligations into floating-rate obligations. Accordingly, the carrying value of time deposits approximated fair value as of September 2016 and December 2015. While these savings and demand deposits and time deposits are carried at amounts that approximate fair value, they are not accounted for at fair value under the fair value option or at fair value in accordance with other U.S. GAAP and therefore are not included in the firm’s fair value hierarchy in Notes 6 through 8. Had these deposits been included in the firm’s fair value hierarchy, they would have been classified in level 2 as of September 2016 and December 2015.