Income taxes	6 Months Ended
Dec. 27, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income taxes	Income taxes The Company’s effective tax rate on its income before income taxes was 25.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 as compared with 33.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. During the second quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company's effective tax rate was favorably impacted primarily by the mix of income in lower tax rate jurisdictions and the release of reserves related to the settlement of an audit in a foreign jurisdiction. During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company's effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted primarily by increases to valuation allowances and reserves, as well as an investment in a foreign subsidiary. For the first six months of fiscal 2015 and 2014, the Company's effective tax rate was 24.9% and 31.9%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2015 was favorably impacted by the mix of income in lower tax rate jurisdictions and the release of reserves, primarily related to the formal deregistration of a foreign branch and the settlement of an audit in a foreign jurisdiction. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2014 was unfavorably impacted primarily by increases to valuation allowances and reserves. The Company applies the guidance in ASC 740, which requires management to use its judgment to the appropriate weighting of all available evidence when assessing the need for the establishment or the release of valuation allowances. As part of this analysis, the Company examines all available evidence on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis and weighs the positive and negative evidence when determining the need for full or partial valuation allowances. The evidence considered for each jurisdiction includes, among other items: (i) the historic levels of income or losses over a range of time periods, which may extend beyond the most recent three fiscal years depending upon the historical volatility of income in an individual jurisdiction; (ii) expectations and risks associated with underlying estimates of future taxable income, including considering the historical trend of down-cycles in the semiconductor and related industries; and (iii) prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. As of the end of fiscal 2014, the Company had a partial valuation allowance against significant net operating loss carry-forward deferred tax assets related to a legal entity in Europe due to, among several other factors, a history of losses in that entity. In recent fiscal years, such entity has been experiencing improved earnings, which required the partial release of the valuation allowance to the extent such entity has projected future taxable income. ASC 740 requires a preponderance of positive evidence in order to reach a conclusion to release all or a portion of a valuation allowance when negative evidence exists. The Company continues to evaluate the need for a valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets and will adjust the valuation allowance as appropriate, which, if reduced, could result in a significant decrease to the effective tax rate in the period of the adjustment.

Income taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate on its income before income taxes was 25.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 as compared with 33.8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. During the second quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company's effective tax rate was favorably impacted primarily by the mix of income in lower tax rate jurisdictions and the release of reserves related to the settlement of an audit in a foreign jurisdiction. During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company's effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted primarily by increases to valuation allowances and reserves, as well as an investment in a foreign subsidiary.

For the first six months of fiscal 2015 and 2014, the Company's effective tax rate was 24.9% and 31.9%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2015 was favorably impacted by the mix of income in lower tax rate jurisdictions and the release of reserves, primarily related to the formal deregistration of a foreign branch and the settlement of an audit in a foreign jurisdiction. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2014 was unfavorably impacted primarily by increases to valuation allowances and reserves.

The Company applies the guidance in ASC 740, which requires management to use its judgment to the appropriate weighting of all available evidence when assessing the need for the establishment or the release of valuation allowances. As part of this analysis, the Company examines all available evidence on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis and weighs the positive and negative evidence when determining the need for full or partial valuation allowances. The evidence considered for each jurisdiction includes, among other items: (i) the historic levels of income or losses over a range of time periods, which may extend beyond the most recent three fiscal years depending upon the historical volatility of income in an individual jurisdiction; (ii) expectations and risks associated with underlying estimates of future taxable income, including considering the historical trend of down-cycles in the semiconductor and related industries; and (iii) prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.

As of the end of fiscal 2014, the Company had a partial valuation allowance against significant net operating loss carry-forward deferred tax assets related to a legal entity in Europe due to, among several other factors, a history of losses in that entity. In recent fiscal years, such entity has been experiencing improved earnings, which required the partial release of the valuation allowance to the extent such entity has projected future taxable income. ASC 740 requires a preponderance of positive evidence in order to reach a conclusion to release all or a portion of a valuation allowance when negative evidence exists. The Company continues to evaluate the need for a valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets and will adjust the valuation allowance as appropriate, which, if reduced, could result in a significant decrease to the effective tax rate in the period of the adjustment.