XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
NOTE C – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The gross carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization for intangible assets subject to amortization and accumulated write-offs of goodwill as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:
 
As of
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Gross Carrying
 
Accumulated
Amortization/
 
Gross
Carrying
 
Accumulated
Amortization/
(in millions)
Amount
 
Write-offs
 
Amount
 
Write-offs
Amortizable intangible assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Technology-related
$
9,390

 
$
(4,675
)
 
$
9,123

 
$
(4,468
)
Patents
511

 
(370
)
 
529

 
(374
)
Other intangible assets
1,632

 
(779
)
 
1,583

 
(722
)
 
$
11,533

 
$
(5,824
)
 
$
11,235

 
$
(5,564
)
Unamortizable intangible assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Goodwill
$
16,771

 
$
(9,900
)
 
$
16,578

 
$
(9,900
)
In-process research and development (IPR&D)
92

 

 
92

 

Technology-related
120

 

 
120

 

 
$
16,983

 
$
(9,900
)
 
$
16,790

 
$
(9,900
)


Our technology-related intangible assets that are not subject to amortization represent technical processes, intellectual property and/or institutional understanding acquired through business combinations that are fundamental to the on-going operations of our business and have no limit to their useful life. Our technology-related intangible assets that are not subject to amortization are comprised primarily of certain acquired balloon and other technology, which is foundational to our continuing operations within the Cardiovascular market and other markets within interventional medicine. We assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually for impairment and reassess their classification as indefinite-lived assets. We assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that our indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired. If we conclude that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, we then determine the fair value of the intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.

The following represents our goodwill balance by global reportable segment:
(in millions)
Cardiovascular
 
Rhythm Management
 
MedSurg
 
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2016
$
3,513

 
$
290

 
$
2,875

 
$
6,678

Impact of foreign currency fluctuations and other changes in carrying amount

4

 
1

 
3

 
8

Goodwill acquired
185

 

 

 
185

Balance as of June 30, 2017
$
3,702

 
$
291

 
$
2,878

 
$
6,871



Goodwill Impairment Testing

In the second quarter of 2017, we performed our annual goodwill impairment test for all of our reporting units and concluded the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Based on the criteria prescribed in FASB ASC Topic 350, we assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment, referred to as a component. For our 2017 and 2016 annual impairment assessment, we identified seven reporting units: Interventional Cardiology, Peripheral Interventions, Cardiac Rhythm Management, Electrophysiology, Endoscopy, Urology and Pelvic Health and Neuromodulation. We aggregated the Cardiac Rhythm Management and Electrophysiology reporting units, components of the Rhythm Management operating segment, based on the criteria prescribed in FASB ASC Topic 350. These reporting units were aggregated due to a reorganization that commenced in 2015 that resulted in integrated leadership, shared resources and consolidation of certain sites in 2016.

In performing the goodwill impairment assessment, we utilized both the optional qualitative assessment and the quantitative approach prescribed under FASB ASC Topic 350. The qualitative assessment was used for testing certain reporting units where fair value has historically exceeded carrying value by greater than 100 percent. All other reporting units were tested using the quantitative approach. After assessing the totality of events, if it is determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, the quantitative approach of the goodwill impairment test is unnecessary. In 2017, for all reporting units tested using the optional qualitative assessment, we concluded that it was not necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. For all reporting units tested using the quantitative approach, we concluded that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Refer to Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion of our annual goodwill impairment testing.

The following is a rollforward of accumulated goodwill write-offs by global reportable segment:
(in millions)
Cardiovascular
 
Rhythm Management
 
MedSurg
 
Total
Accumulated write-offs as of December 31, 2016
$
(1,479
)
 
$
(6,960
)
 
$
(1,461
)
 
$
(9,900
)
Goodwill written off

 

 

 

Accumulated write-offs as of June 30, 2017
$
(1,479
)
 
$
(6,960
)
 
$
(1,461
)
 
$
(9,900
)