XML 26 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Acquisitions
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
ACQUISITIONS
ACQUISITIONS

On May 7, 2014, we completed the acquisition of the remaining fully diluted equity of IoGyn, Inc. (IoGyn). Prior to the acquisition, we held approximately 28 percent minority interest in IoGyn in addition to notes receivable of approximately $8 million. Total consideration was comprised of a net cash payment of $65 million at closing to acquire the remaining 72 percent of IoGyn equity and repay outstanding debt. IoGyn has developed the SymphionTM System, a next generation system for hysteroscopic intrauterine tissue removal including fibroids (myomas) and polyps. In March 2014, IoGyn received U.S. FDA approval for the system, and we expect to launch the system in the United States in the second half of 2014. We will integrate the operations of the IoGyn business with our gynecological surgery business, which is part of our Urology and Women’s Health division.

On May 15, 2014, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Interventional Division of Bayer AG, for $415 million in cash at closing. We expect to close this transaction in the second half of 2014, subject to customary closing conditions.
We did not close any material acquisitions during the first half of 2013.
Purchase Price Allocation
We accounted for the acquisition of IoGyn as a business combination and, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification® (ASC) Topic 805, Business Combinations, we have recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. The components of the aggregate purchase price for the acquisition consummated in 2014 are as follows (in millions):
Cash, net of cash acquired
$
65

Fair value of prior interests
31

 
$
96



We re-measured our previously held investments to their estimated acquisition-date fair value of $31 million and recorded a gain of $19 million in other, net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations during the second quarter of 2014. We measured the fair values of the previously held investments based on the liquidation preferences and priority of the equity interests and debt, including accrued interest.

Total consideration for the 2014 acquisition included cash payments of $65 million, net of cash acquired, at closing of the transaction.

The following summarizes the aggregate purchase price allocation for the 2014 acquisition as of June 30, 2014 (in millions):
Goodwill
$
39

Amortizable intangible assets
72

Other net assets
(1
)
Deferred income taxes
(14
)
 
$
96



We allocated a portion of the purchase price to specific intangible asset categories as follows:
 
Amount
Assigned
(in millions)
 
Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period
(in years)
 
Range of Risk-
Adjusted Discount
Rates used in
Purchase Price
Allocation
Amortizable intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Technology-related
$
71

 
14
 
14%
Other intangible assets
1

 
2
 
14%
 
$
72

 
 
 
 


Our technology-related intangible assets consist of technical processes, intellectual property, and institutional understanding with respect to products and processes that we will leverage in future products or processes and will carry forward from one product generation to the next. We used the income approach to derive the fair value of the technology-related intangible assets, and are amortizing them on a straight-line basis over their assigned estimated useful lives.

We believe that the estimated intangible asset values represent the fair value at the date of acquisition and do not exceed the amount a third party would pay for the assets. These fair value measurements are based on significant unobservable inputs, including management estimates and assumptions and, accordingly, are classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy prescribed by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
We recorded the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable assets acquired as goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill was established due primarily to synergies expected to be gained from leveraging our existing operations as well as revenue and cash flow projections associated with future technologies, and has been allocated to our reportable segments based on the relative expected benefit. See Note D - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for more information related to goodwill allocated to our reportable segments.

Contingent Consideration
Certain of our acquisitions involve contingent consideration arrangements. Payment of additional consideration is generally contingent on the acquired company reaching certain performance milestones, including attaining specified revenue levels, achieving product development targets and/or obtaining regulatory approvals. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we recognize a liability equal to the fair value of the contingent payments we expect to make as of the acquisition date. We remeasure this liability each reporting period and record changes in the fair value through a separate line item within our consolidated statements of operations.
We recorded a net benefit related to the change in fair value of our contingent consideration liabilities of $96 million in the second quarter of 2014, $118 million in the first half of 2014, $18 million in the second quarter of 2013, and $41 million during the first half of 2013. We paid contingent consideration of $3 million in the second quarter of 2014, $15 million in the first half of 2014 and $15 million during the second quarter and first half of 2013.
Changes in the fair value of our contingent consideration liability were as follows (in millions):
Balance as of December 31, 2013
$
(501
)
Amounts recorded related to new acquisitions
(3
)
Other amounts recorded related to prior acquisitions
(1
)
Net fair value adjustments
118

Payments made
15

Balance as of June 30, 2014
$
(372
)

As of June 30, 2014, the maximum amount of future contingent consideration (undiscounted) that we could be required to pay was approximately $2.2 billion.
Contingent consideration liabilities are remeasured to fair value each reporting period using projected revenues, discount rates, probabilities of payment and projected payment dates. The recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of our contingent consideration liability include the following significant unobservable inputs:
Contingent Consideration Liability
Fair Value as of June 30, 2014
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Input
Range
R&D, Regulatory and Commercialization-based Milestones
$61 million
Probability Weighted Discounted Cash Flow
Discount Rate
0.9%-1.4%
Probability of Payment
60% - 95%
Projected Year of Payment
2014 - 2015
Revenue-based Payments
$69 million
Discounted Cash Flow
Discount Rate
11.5% - 15%
Probability of Payment
0% - 100%
Projected Year of Payment
2014 - 2018
$242 million
Monte Carlo
Revenue Volatility
11% - 13%
Risk Free Rate
LIBOR Term Structure
Projected Year of Payment
2014-2018


Increases or decreases in the fair value of our contingent consideration liability can result from changes in discount periods and rates, as well as changes in the timing and amount of revenue estimates or in the timing or likelihood of achieving regulatory-, revenue- or commercialization-based milestones. Projected contingent payment amounts related to research and development, regulatory- and commercialization-based milestones and certain revenue-based milestones are discounted back to the current period using a discounted cash flow (DCF) model. Other revenue-based payments are valued using a Monte Carlo valuation model, which simulates future revenues during the earn-out period using management's best estimates. Projected revenues are based on our most recent internal operational budgets and long-range strategic plans. Increases in projected revenues and probabilities of payment may result in higher fair value measurements. Increases in discount rates and the time to payment may result in lower fair value measurements. Increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation may result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.