10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number 0-21554

DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Wisconsin	39-1472124
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

103 East Main Street, Denmark, Wisconsin 54208-0130

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(920) 863-2161

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

___ Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer

_ Non-accelerated filer _X_Smaller reporting company

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

As of May 4, 2012, there were 118,568 shares of the registrant's common stock (no par value) outstanding.

DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2012

Page No.

PART I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition 3

Consolidated Statements of Income 4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity 5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations 21

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 28

Item 4. Controls and Procedures 28

PART II. Other Information

Item 1A. Risk Factors 28

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 29

Item 6. Exhibits 29

Signatures 30

Item 1. Financial Statements

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

		March 31,	December 31,
		2012	2011
		(Unaudited)
Assets
	Cash and due from banks	$20,306,017	$21,905,812
	Federal funds sold	7,158,000	20,187,000
	Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value	76,787,355	67,610,693
	Loans	301,606,123	297,832,116
	Allowance for credit losses	(6,603,188)	(6,578,087)
	Net loans	$295,002,935	$291,254,029
	Loans held for sale	434,875	485,926
	Premises and equipment, net	7,047,443	7,085,783
	Other investments, at cost	3,106,696	4,404,811
	Accrued interest receivable	1,392,095	1,244,473
	Other assets	11,495,737	11,807,370
	TOTAL ASSETS	$422,731,153	$425,985,897
Liabilities
	Deposits
	Noninterest-bearing	$39,594,755	$47,469,622
	Interest-bearing	285,327,600	280,323,469
	Total Deposits	$324,922,355	$327,793,091
	Short-term borrowings	11,208,861	11,558,861
	Accrued interest payable	333,690	334,178
	Other liabilities	988,381	1,794,808
	Long-term debt	28,473,699	28,481,999
	Total Liabilities	$365,926,986	$369,962,937
Stockholders' Equity
	Common stock, no par value, authorized 640,000 shares; outstanding 118,568 shares at 3/31/12 and 118,917 shares at 12/31/11	$18,173,975	$18,173,975
	Treasury stock shares, at cost (2,962 at 3/31/12 and 2,613 at 12/31/11)	(2,272,445)	(2,125,865)
	Paid in capital	469,986	469,986
	Retained earnings	40,767,444	39,918,706
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(334,793)	(413,842)
	Total Stockholders' Equity	$56,804,167	$56,022,960
	TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$422,731,153	$425,985,897

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

		For the Three Months Ended
		March 31,	March 31,
		2012	2011
Interest Income
	Loans including fees	$3,786,010	$3,988,583
	Investment securities:
	Taxable	278,430	244,923
	Exempt from federal tax	194,405	324,195
	Interest on federal funds sold	4,649	7,469
	Other interest income	41,090	53,688
		$4,304,584	$4,618,858
Interest Expense
	Deposits	$634,669	$822,348
	Short-term borrowings	14,854	29,457
	Long-term debt	246,426	251,186
		$895,949	$1,102,991
	Net interest income	$3,408,635	$3,515,867
Provision for Credit Losses		150,000	150,000
	Net interest income after provision for credit losses	$3,258,635	$3,365,867
Other Income
	Service fees and commissions	$307,511	$208,811
	Loan sale gains	117,804	79,471
	Other	170,323	202,524
		$595,638	$490,806
Other-than-Temporary Impairment Losses, Net
	Total other-than-temporary impairment losses	$1,664,868	$916,690
	Amount in other comprehensive income, before taxes	(1,631,993)	(892,216)
		$32,875	$24,474
Other Expense
	Salaries and employee benefits	$1,579,870	$1,515,154
	Occupancy expenses	228,093	245,035
	FDIC Insurance	74,463	165,000
	Data processing expenses	242,536	198,202
	Professional fees	87,650	97,589
	Amortization of intangibles	48,098	48,098
	Loss on sale of other real estate	59,984	6,520
	Other real estate expenses	18,908	79,580
	Other operating expenses	199,533	196,792
		$2,539,135	$2,551,970
	Income before income taxes	$1,282,263	$1,280,229
	Income tax expense	433,525	367,364
	NET INCOME	$848,738	$912,865
	Per Share
	Net income	$7.14	$7.68
	Dividends declared	$0.00	$0.00
	Weighted average shares outstanding	118,897	118,917
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended
	March 31,	March 31,
	2012	2011
Net income	$848,738	$912,865
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Unrealized gains on securities
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period	194,109	(181,659)
Plus: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income	32,875	24,474
Other comprehensive income (loss)	226,984	(157,185)
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income	(147,935)	50,050
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	$79,049	($107,135)
Comprehensive income	$927,787	$805,730

Denmark Bancshares, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(Unaudited)
	Common Stock				Accumulated
					Other
			Paid in	Retained	Comprehensive
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Earnings	Income	Total
Balance, December 31, 2011	118,917	$16,048,110	$469,986	$39,918,706	($413,842)	$56,022,960
Comprehensive income
Net income				848,738		848,738
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Change in unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale,
net of reclassification adjustment					79,049	79,049
Total comprehensive income						$927,787
Treasury stock acquisitions	(349)	(146,580)				(146,580)
Balance, March 31, 2012	118,568	$15,901,530	$469,986	$40,767,444	($334,793)	$56,804,167
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

		For the Three Months Ended
		March 31,
		2012	2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
	Net income	$848,738	$912,865
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to
	net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
	Depreciation	94,782	104,123
	Provision for credit losses	150,000	150,000
	Amortization of intangibles	48,098	48,098
	Gains on sales of loans	(117,804)	(79,741)
	Loss on sale of other real estate	59,984	6,520
	Loss on investment securities impairment writedowns	32,875	24,474
	Amortization of bond premium	175,636	103,464
	Accretion of bond discount	(20,196)	(60,630)
	Mortgage loans originated for sale	(7,695,636)	(7,517,838)
	Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans	7,863,777	4,082,962
	Income from bank owned life insurance	(66,299)	(66,000)
	Increase in interest receivable	(147,622)	(154,827)
	(Decrease) increase in interest payable	(488)	1,162
	Other, net	68,286	(41,627)
	Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities	$1,294,131	($2,486,995)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
	Maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities	$4,773,194	$5,865,794
	Purchases of available-for-sale securities	(13,911,187)	(6,974,158)
	Net purchases of money market mutual funds	0	(37,682)
	Proceeds from sale of FHLB common stock	1,298,115	0
	Federal funds sold, net	13,029,000	2,455,000
	Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets	206,350	593,279
	Net (increase) decrease in loans made to customers	(3,995,192)	6,359,211
	Capital expenditures	(56,442)	(5,843)
	Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities	$1,343,838	$8,255,601
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
	Net decrease in deposits	($2,870,736)	($7,105,967)
	Purchase of treasury stock	(146,580)	0
	Dividends paid	(862,148)	(862,148)
	Debt proceeds	900,000	1,600,000
	Debt repayments	(1,258,300)	(1,825,000)
	Net Cash Used in Financing Activities	($4,237,764)	($8,193,115)
	Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	($1,599,795)	($2,424,509)
	Cash and cash equivalents, beginning	21,905,812	16,917,728
	CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING	$20,306,017	$14,493,219
Noncash Investing Activities:
	Loans transferred to foreclosed properties	$97,000	$109,558
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures:
	Cash paid for interest	$896,529	$821,866
	Cash paid for income taxes	425,000	130,980
	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

NOTE 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited. In the opinion of management, these statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Denmark Bancshares, Inc. ("DBI"), its results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. All adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements are of a normal recurring nature. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in DBI's latest annual report on Form 10-K. DBI's subsidiaries are Denmark State Bank ("DSB"), Denmark Agricultural Credit Corporation ("DACC"), and DBI Properties, Inc. ("Properties").

Reclassifications - Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the current year.

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and estimated fair market value of securities available-for-sale were as follows:

	March 31, 2012
		Gross	Gross	Estimated
	Amortized	Unrealized	Unrealized	Fair
	Cost	Gains	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$5,500,000	$10,450	($15,600)	$5,494,850
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	39,628,939	620,228	(51,036)	40,198,131
State and local governments	24,083,233	1,048,271	(136,314)	24,995,190
Residential mortgage-backed securities	8,133,171	24,746	(2,058,733)	6,099,184
	$77,345,343	$1,703,695	($2,261,683)	$76,787,355
	December 31, 2011
		Gross	Gross	Estimated
	Amortized	Unrealized	Unrealized	Fair
	Cost	Gains	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$3,500,000	$17,050	$0	$3,517,050
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	31,729,409	505,292	(8,172)	32,226,529
State and local governments	24,628,519	1,032,038	(192,058)	25,468,499
Residential mortgage-backed securities	8,537,737	26,590	(2,165,712)	6,398,615
	$68,395,665	$1,580,970	($2,365,942)	$67,610,693

Proceeds of $3.3 million from normal pay-downs, $1.0 million from calls and $0.5 million from maturities were received during the first quarter of 2012. Purchases of $11.1 million of agency mortgage-backed securities ("MBS"), $2.0 million of agencies and $0.8 million of taxable municipals were made during this same period.

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities at March 31, 2012, by maturity were as follows:

	Securities Available-for-Sale
		Estimated
	Amortized	Fair
Amounts Maturing	Cost	Value
Within one year	$2,684,867	$2,753,922
From one through five years	40,162,778	39,957,488
From five through ten years	21,450,486	21,216,280
After ten years	13,047,212	12,859,665
	$77,345,343	$76,787,355

MBS are allocated according to their expected prepayments rather than their contractual maturities. Certain state and local governments' securities are allocated according to their put date. Fair values of securities are estimated based on financial models or prices paid for similar securities. It is possible interest rates could change considerably resulting in a material change in the estimated fair value of the securities.

At March 31, 2012, twenty debt securities have unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 10.4% from DSB's amortized cost basis. Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position follows:

March 31, 2012	Less Than Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
	Gross	Estimated	Gross	Estimated
	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair
Securities Available for Sale	Losses	Value	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$15,600	$1,984,400	$0	$0
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	51,036	8,879,481	0	0
State and local governments	24,886	1,518,591	111,428	1,875,195
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	0	2,058,733	5,192,342
Total securities available for sale	$91,522	$12,382,472	$2,170,161	$7,067,537
December 31, 2011	Less Than Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
	Gross	Estimated	Gross	Estimated
	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair
Securities Available for Sale	Losses	Value	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	$8,172	$2,388,919	$0	$0
State and local governments	14,144	817,753	177,914	1,808,504
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	0	2,165,712	5,359,064
Total securities available for sale	$22,316	$3,206,672	$2,343,626	$7,167,568

All securities with unrealized losses are assessed to determine if the impairment is other-than-temporary. Factors that are evaluated include the mortgage loan types supporting the securities, delinquency and foreclosure rates, credit support, weighted average loan-to-value, and year of origination, among others.

Currently, a quarterly analysis by a third party is performed on three residential MBS secured by non-traditional loan types in order to determine whether they are other-than-temporarily impaired ("OTTI"). The purpose of the third party evaluation is to determine if the present value of the expected cash flows is less than the amortized costs, thereby resulting in credit loss, in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance under FASB ASC Topic 320. The third party determines an estimated fair value for each security based on discounted cash flow analyses. The estimates are based on the following key valuation assumptions - collateral cash flows, prepayment assumptions, default rates, loss severity, liquidation lag, bond waterfall and internal rate of return. Since there is currently no active secondary market for these types of securities due to the non-traditional loan types supporting the securities, these valuations are considered Level 3 inputs as defined in Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement. Additional securities may be analyzed in the future if deemed necessary to determine whether they are OTTI and if so, if any possible credit loss exists.

Two of the three securities supported by non-traditional loan types were previously found to have credit losses since a portion of the unrealized losses is due to an expected cash flow shortfall. As such, these securities were determined to be OTTI. DBI does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that DBI will be required to sell the securities before the anticipated recovery of their remaining amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. The analysis on the third security did not reveal any credit loss nor was the security found to be OTTI. The total credit loss that was recognized in earnings through December 31, 2011 was $0.6 million. The analysis performed as of March 31, 2012 resulted in an additional $32,875 of credit loss that was recorded through the income statement during the current period on the two OTTI securities. Unrealized losses on the three securities analyzed by the third party were recognized through accumulated other comprehensive loss on the balance sheet as of March 31, 2012, net of tax, in the amount of $1.2 million.

The unrealized losses on the remainder of the residential MBS are due to the distressed and illiquid markets for collateralized mortgage obligations. The securities are investments in senior tranches with adequate credit support from subordinate tranches, are supported by traditional mortgage loans that originated between 2002 and 2005, have low delinquency and foreclosure rates, and reasonable loan-to-value ratios. DBI does not consider these investments to be OTTI at March 31, 2012.

Changes in credit losses recognized for securities with OTTI were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended		For the Year Ended
	March 31,		December 31,
	2012	2011	2011
Credit losses recognized in earnings, beginning of period	($637,245)	($432,488)	($432,488)
Credit losses for OTTI not previously recognized	(32,875)	(24,474)	(204,757)
Credit losses recognized in earnings, end of period	($670,120)	($456,962)	($637,245)

NOTE 3 - LOANS

Loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of the allowance for credit losses. Interest on loans is calculated and accrued by using the simple interest method on the daily balance of the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees are credited to income when received and the related loan origination costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalization of the fees net of the related costs would not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

DBI's customer information system tracks the past due status of all loans beginning with the first day a payment is late. On a weekly basis, lenders are given a report with all loans past due one day or more to allow them to actively monitor the portfolio and attempt to keep past due levels to a minimum.

All loans are given an internal risk rating when the loan is originated. On a quarterly basis, risk rating reports are distributed to the lenders to ensure that loans are appropriately rated. On an annual basis, all commercial loans over $100,000 and agricultural loans over $200,000 are reviewed by the loan officer and/or credit analyst. All loans over $1 million are independently reviewed annually by the Chief Credit Officer. An independent third party also performs periodic reviews of risk ratings to ensure that loans are accurately graded. The internal risk ratings are defined as:

• Non-classified loans are assigned a risk rating of 1 - 4, with a one-rated credit being the highest quality. Non-classified loans have credit quality that ranges from well above average quality to some inherent industry weaknesses that may present higher than average risk due to conditions affecting the borrower, the borrower's industry or economic environment.
• Special mention loans are assigned a risk rating of 5. Potential weaknesses exist that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of repayment prospects or in DSB's credit position at some future date.
• Substandard loans are assigned a rating of 6. These loans are inadequately protected by the current worth and borrowing capacity of the borrower. Well-defined weaknesses exist that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. There is a possibility of some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. At this point, the loan may still be performing and accruing.
• Doubtful loans are rated 7 and have all the weaknesses of a substandard credit plus the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of current facts, conditions and values highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high but because of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors, which may work to the advantage of strengthening the asset, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status can be determined.
• Loss loans are internally rated as an 8. A loss amount has been determined and this has been charged-off against the allowance for loan losses. All or a portion of the charge-off may be recovered in the future and any such recoveries would also be recorded through the allowance.

DBI's policy is to place into nonaccrual status all loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more, along with other loans as to which reasonable doubt exists to the full and timely collection of principal and/or interest based on management's view of the financial condition of the borrower. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.

Loan charge-offs for all loans will occur as soon as there is a reasonable probability of loss. When the amount of the loss can be readily calculated, the charge-off will be recorded as soon as practical within the calendar quarter the loss was identified. Loans that are partially charged-off will be placed in nonaccrual status unless the remaining loan is restructured with adequate collateral and payments are assured and current.

A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that not all amounts due will be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Interest income is recognized in the same manner described above for nonaccrual loans. Further detail on the analysis of impaired loans can be found below in the discussion of the Allowance for Loan Losses, below.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that have been incurred in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic accounting principles: (1) FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 310-10 "Receivables - Overall," (formerly FAS 114), which requires that losses be accrued when it is probable that DBI will not collect all principal and interest payments according to the loan's contractual terms, and (2) FASB ASC Topic 450, "Contingencies," (formerly FAS 5), which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable. The FFIEC "Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses" provides additional guidance on the allowance methodology.

On a quarterly basis, management utilizes a systematic methodology to determine an appropriate allowance for loan losses. This methodology includes a loan grading system that requires quarterly reviews; identification of loans to be evaluated on an individual basis for impairment; results of independent reviews of asset quality and the adequacy of the allowance by regulatory agencies; consideration of current trends and volumes of nonperforming, past-due, nonaccrual and potential problem loans; as well as national and local economic trends and industry conditions.

In applying the methodology, all troubled debt restructurings, regardless of size, are considered impaired and will be individually evaluated. All nonaccrual and watchlist commercial real estate, construction and land development, agricultural real estate, multifamily residential real estate, commercial, and agricultural production loans over $50,000 are evaluated individually to determine if they are impaired. Nonaccrual residential real estate or consumer loans that are larger than customary for DBI will also be considered impaired and evaluated individually as there would be no pool of similar loans to evaluate these loans under ASC Topic 450. Impaired loans are measured at the estimated fair value of the collateral. If the estimated fair value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized by creating a valuation allowance in conjunction with ASC Topic 310-10.

Loans that are not impaired are segmented into groups by type of loan. The following loan types are utilized so each segment of loans will have similar risk factors: (1) residential real estate, (2) agricultural real estate, (3) commercial real estate, (4) construction and land development, (5) commercial, (6) agricultural, (7) consumer, (8) guaranteed loans and (9) other. These loans are further segmented by internal risk ratings of non-classified, special mention, substandard and doubtful, which are defined above.

Risk factor percentages are applied to the risk rating segments of the non-impaired loans to calculate an allowance allocation in conjunction with ASC Topic 450. The risk factor percentages are based on historical loan loss experience for each loan type and are adjusted for current economic conditions and trends as well as internal loan quality trends. The historical loan loss percentages are applied to the non-classified portion of the portfolio to determine the required allocation to the allowance. The historical loan loss percentages are then multiplied by a factor based on current economic conditions to calculate the allocation for each of the remaining risk rating categories of the non-impaired loans. The current economic conditions take into account items such as vacancy rates for rental properties; property values based on actual sales transactions; income projections based on current prices such as dairy commodities; and other available economic data.

The above steps result in calculations that estimate the credit losses inherent in the portfolio at that time. The calculations are used to confirm the adequacy and appropriateness of the actual balance of the allowance, recognizing that the allowance represents an aggregation of judgments and estimates by management. Such calculations will influence the amount of future provisions for loan losses charged to expense.

The calculation is submitted to DSB's Board of Directors quarterly along with a recommendation for the amount of the monthly provision to the allowance. If the mix and amount of future charge-offs differ significantly from those assumptions used by management in making its determination, the allowance and provision expense could be materially affected.

Major categories of loans included in the loan portfolio are as follows:

	March 31,	December 31,
	2012	2011
Real Estate:
Residential	$72,878,120	$72,655,569
Commercial	61,453,156	60,864,761
Agricultural	78,826,886	78,767,692
Construction	11,828,100	11,655,550
	224,986,262	223,943,572
Commercial	38,992,273	35,178,049
Agricultural	27,361,390	27,661,420
Consumer and other	10,266,198	11,049,075
TOTAL	$301,606,123	$297,832,116

The following table presents information related to the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011:

		Three months ended		Three months ended
		March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011
	$(000)s	Average	Interest	Average	Interest
		Recorded	Income	Recorded	Income
		Investment	Recognized	Investment	Recognized
With no related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,601	$4	$930	$7
Commercial Real Estate		2,366	8	1,933	13
Construction & Land Dev		2,264	14	2,590	29
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	0
Commercial		757	2	577	8
Agricultural		0	0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	0	0
With a related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,042	$5	$979	$0
Commercial Real Estate		2,738	7	4,533	0
Construction & Land Dev		2,832	1	1,915	21
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	0
Commercial		41	0	62	0
Agricultural		0	0	116	0
Consumer		143	0	149	0
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$2,643	$9	$1,909	$7
Commercial Real Estate		5,104	15	6,466	13
Construction & Land Dev		5,096	15	4,505	50
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	0
Commercial		798	2	639	8
Agricultural		0	0	116	0
Consumer		143	0	149	0
	Total	$13,784	$41	$13,784	$78

The following tables show the investment in impaired loans and the corresponding allowance for those loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Impaired Loans

	$(000)s		Unpaid
		Recorded	Principal	Related
March 31, 2012		Investment	Balance	Allowance
With no related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,456	$1,594	$0
Commercial Real Estate		2,085	2,359	0
Construction & Land Dev		2,238	2,238	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		748	795	0
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	0
With a related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$945	$1,040	$150
Commercial Real Estate		2,585	2,730	697
Construction & Land Dev		2,831	2,831	579
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		37	41	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		140	142	127
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$2,401	$2,634	$150
Commercial Real Estate		4,670	5,089	697
Construction & Land Dev		5,069	5,069	579
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		785	836	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		140	142	127
	Total	$13,065	$13,770	$1,567

	$(000)s		Unpaid
		Recorded	Principal	Related
December 31, 2011		Investment	Balance	Allowance
With no related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$805	$841	$0
Commercial Real Estate		1,433	1,698	0
Construction & Land Dev		2,658	2,658	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		890	935	0
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		43	43	0
With a related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,190	$1,392	$171
Commercial Real Estate		2,482	2,615	721
Construction & Land Dev		2,832	2,832	580
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		38	41	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		142	144	129
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$1,995	$2,233	$171
Commercial Real Estate		3,915	4,313	721
Construction & Land Dev		5,490	5,490	580
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		928	976	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		185	187	129
	Total	$12,513	$13,199	$1,615

Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables

		March 31,
		2012		2011		December 31, 2011
			Ending Balance		Ending Balance		Ending Balance
			Individually		Individually		Individually
	$(000)s	Ending	Evaluated	Ending	Evaluated	Ending	Evaluated
		Balance	for Impairment	Balance	for Impairment	Balance	for Impairment
Residential Real Estate		$72,878	$2,401	$76,730	$1,646	$72,656	$1,995
Commercial Real Estate		61,453	4,670	58,665	6,321	60,865	3,915
Construction & Land Dev		11,828	5,069	12,899	4,497	11,655	5,490
Agricultural Real Estate		78,827	0	69,909	0	78,768	0
Commercial		38,992	785	45,591	665	35,178	928
Agricultural		27,362	0	25,383	116	27,661	0
Consumer		10,266	140	10,362	148	11,049	185
Unallocated		0	0	0	0	0	0
Total		$301,606	$13,065	$299,539	$13,393	$297,832	$12,513

Allowance for Loan Losses

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

	$(000)s						Ending Balance
		Beginning				Ending	Individually
		Balance				Balance	Evaluated
2012		1/1/2012	Charge-offs	Recoveries	Provision	3/31/2012	for Impairment
Residential Real Estate		$1,132	($134)	$4	$187	$1,189	$150
Commercial Real Estate		2,858	0	3	(8)	2,853	697
Construction & Land Dev		1,163	0	0	54	1,217	579
Agricultural Real Estate		198	0	0	3	201	0
Commercial		202	0	6	21	229	14
Agricultural		263	0	0	(8)	255	0
Consumer		150	(6)	2	0	146	127
Unallocated		612	0	0	(99)	513	0
Total		$6,578	($140)	$15	$150	$6,603	$1,567
							Ending Balance
	$(000)s	Beginning				Ending	Individually
		Balance				Balance	Evaluated
2011		1/1/2011	Charge-offs	Recoveries	Provision	3/31/2011	for Impairment
Residential Real Estate		$1,429	($29)	$6	($10)	$1,396	$171
Commercial Real Estate		2,849	0	2	271	3,122	1,132
Construction & Land Dev		880	(65)	0	39	854	41
Agricultural Real Estate		204	0	0	(9)	195	0
Commercial		278	(225)	11	242	306	26
Agricultural		347	0	2	(115)	234	97
Consumer		160	(1)	1	(3)	157	135
Unallocated		718	0	0	(265)	453	0
Total		$6,865	($320)	$22	$150	$6,717	$1,602

Nonaccrual loans totaled $9.1 million and $8.7 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. There were no loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing. A schedule of loans by the number of days past due (including nonaccrual loans) along with a schedule of credit quality indicators follows:

Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables

		30-89 Days	90 Days	Total		Total Financing
	$(000)s	Past Due	& Over	Past Due	Current	Receivables
	March 31, 2012
Residential Real Estate		$1,295	$897	$2,192	$70,686	$72,878
Commercial Real Estate		389	1,226	1,615	59,838	61,453
Construction & Land Dev		14	1,023	1,037	10,791	11,828
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	78,827	78,827
Commercial		393	317	710	38,282	38,992
Agricultural		0	0	0	27,362	27,362
Consumer		28	36	64	10,202	10,266
	Total	$2,119	$3,499	$5,618	$295,988	$301,606

		30-89 Days	90 Days	Total		Total Financing
	$(000)s	Past Due	& Over	Past Due	Current	Receivables
	December 31, 2011
Residential Real Estate		$1,319	$866	$2,185	$70,471	$72,656
Commercial Real Estate		1,103	1,074	2,177	58,688	60,865
Construction & Land Dev		0	1,452	1,452	10,203	11,655
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	78,768	78,768
Commercial		185	200	385	34,793	35,178
Agricultural		0	0	0	27,661	27,661
Consumer		63	81	144	10,905	11,049
	Total	$2,670	$3,673	$6,343	$291,489	$297,832

Credit Quality Indicators

	$(000)s		Special
	March 31, 2012	Non-Classified	Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Total
Residential Real Estate		$59,803	$5,608	$5,330	$2,137	$72,878
Commercial Real Estate		48,687	4,944	4,463	3,359	61,453
Construction & Land Dev		5,128	1,058	2,999	2,643	11,828
Agricultural Real Estate		71,002	7,825	0	0	78,827
Commercial		36,597	994	1,214	187	38,992
Agricultural		23,821	3,541	0	0	27,362
Consumer		9,979	86	38	163	10,266
Total		$255,017	$24,056	$14,044	$8,489	$301,606
	$(000)s		Special
	December 31, 2011	Non-Classified	Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Total
Residential Real Estate		$58,960	$6,277	$6,501	$918	$72,656
Commercial Real Estate		49,547	3,668	4,787	2,863	60,865
Construction & Land Dev		4,691	898	4,154	1,912	11,655
Agricultural Real Estate		70,412	8,356	0	0	78,768
Commercial		32,600	1,250	1,164	164	35,178
Agricultural		23,779	3,882	0	0	27,661
Consumer		10,678	102	127	142	11,049
Total		$250,667	$24,433	$16,733	$5,999	$297,832

Modifications

As of March 31, 2012

			Pre-Modification	Post-Modification	Recorded	Impact to
	$(000)s	Number of	Recorded	Recorded	Investment	Allowance
		Contracts	Investment	Investment	as of 9/30/2011	for Credit Losses
Residential Real Estate		3	$177	$177	$177	$151

Since December 31, 2011 there were no loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted.

NOTE 4 - NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03 Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This update to Topic 860, "Transfers and Servicing," modifies the criteria for determining when repurchase agreements would be accounted for as a secured borrowing rather than a sale. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-03 remove from the assessment of effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. This update does not change the other existing criteria used in the assessment of effective control. ASU No. 2011-03 is effective prospectively for transactions, or modifications of existing transactions, that occur on or after January 1, 2012. These amendments did not have any impact on DBI's financial statements.

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. These amendments to Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement," result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). The changes to U.S. GAAP as a result of ASU No. 2011-04 are as follows; (a) the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets; (b) U.S. GAAP currently prohibits application of a blockage factor in valuing financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets, however ASU No. 2011-04 extends that prohibition to all fair value measurements; (c) an exception is provided to the basic fair value measurement principles for an entity that holds a group of financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk that are managed on the basis of the entity's net exposure to either of those risks which allows the entity, if certain criteria are met, to measure the fair value of the net asset or liability position in a manner consistent with how market participants would price the net risk position; (d) aligns the fair value measurement of instruments classified within an entity's shareholders' equity with the guidance for liabilities; and (e) disclosure requirements have been enhanced for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements to disclose quantitative information about unobservable inputs and assumptions used, to describe the valuation processes used by the entity, and to describe the sensitivity of fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs. In addition, entities must report the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of condition but whose fair value must be disclosed. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 are effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 did not have a material impact on DBI's financial statements.

In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This update to Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income," allows an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The statement(s) are required to be presented with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders' equity but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive must be reclassified to net income. ASU No. 2011-05 is effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 changed the presentation of DBI's income statement and the addition of a statement of other comprehensive income. The adoption did not have any impact on DBI's statement of financial condition.

In September 2011, FASB issues ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This update to Topic 350, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other," permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Previous guidance under Topic 350 required an entity to test goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount (step one). If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the second step of the test must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under the amendments of this update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. If after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. An entity has the option under this update to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-08 had no impact on DBI's financial statements.

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASURMENT

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in a transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Some assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis, as required by U.S. GAAP, which also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. The three levels of inputs defined in the standard that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1: Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
• Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
• Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little, if any, market activity. These unobservable inputs reflect estimates that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liability.

DBI used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Federal Funds Sold: For cash, cash equivalents and federal funds sold, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment Securities: Investment securities available-for-sale ("AFS") are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value measurement of most of DBI's AFS securities is currently determined by an independent provider using Level 2 inputs (except as noted below). The measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar assets, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using matrix pricing models, or other model-based valuation techniques requiring observable inputs other than quoted prices such as yield curves, prepayment speed and default rates. Two of DBI's AFS MBS that are secured by non-traditional mortgage loans and one AFS MBS secured by traditional mortgage loans that was previously downgraded were analyzed by a third party in order to determine an estimated fair value. The estimated fair values were based on discounted cash flow analyses and are considered Level 3 inputs.

Refer to Note 2 - Investment Securities for additional detail on the assumptions used in determining the estimated fair values and additional disclosures regarding DBI's investment securities. For other securities held as investments, fair value equals quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

Loans Receivable: The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Loans Held for Sale: Mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value is based on a market commitment for the sale of the loan in the secondary market. These loans are typically sold within one week of funding. DBI classifies mortgage loans held for sale as nonrecurring Level 2 assets.

Impaired Loans: As defined below in the Glossary of Loan Terms section, a loan is considered impaired when, based on current information or events, it is probable that not all amounts due will be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. The collateral value is determined based on appraisals and other market valuations for similar assets. Under FASB ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," the fair value of impaired loans is reported before selling costs of the related collateral, while FASB ASC Topic 310, "Receivables," requires that impaired loans be reported on the balance sheet net of estimated selling costs. Therefore, significant estimated selling costs would result in the reported fair value of impaired loans being greater than the measurement value of impaired loans as maintained on the balance sheet. In most instances, selling costs were estimated for real estate-secured collateral and included broker commissions, legal and title transfer fees and closing costs. Impaired loans are classified as nonrecurring Level 2 assets.

Other Investments: For other investments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Other Real Estate Owned: Real estate that DBI has taken control of in partial or full satisfaction of debt is valued at the lower of book value or fair value. The fair value is determined by analyzing the collateral value of the real estate using appraisals and other market valuations for similar assets less any estimated selling costs. The value carried on the balance sheet for other real estate owned is estimated fair value of the properties. Other real estate owned is classified as a nonrecurring Level 2 asset.

Bank Owned Life Insurance: The carrying amount of bank owned life insurance approximates fair value.

Deposit Liabilities: The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Borrowings: Rates currently available to DSB for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing debt.

Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit and Financial Guarantees Written: The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of guarantees and letters of credit is not material.

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, are summarized in the table below:

	March 31, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$5,494,850	$0	$5,494,850
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	0	40,198,131	0	40,198,131
State and local governments	0	24,995,190	0	24,995,190
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	2,199,340	3,899,844	6,099,184
Total securities available for sale	$0	$72,887,511	$3,899,844	$76,787,355
	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$3,517,050	$0	$3,517,050
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	0	32,226,529	0	32,226,529
State and local governments	0	25,468,499	0	25,468,499
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	2,355,680	4,042,935	6,398,615
Total securities available for sale	$0	$63,567,758	$4,042,935	$67,610,693

The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable (Level 3) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Available-
	for-Sale
	Securities
Beginning balance, January 1, 2012	$4,042,935
Total realized and unrealized gains/(losses):
Included in earnings	(32,875)
Included in other comprehensive income	59,484
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements
Purchases	0
Issuances	0
Sales	0
Settlements	(169,700)
Transfers into Level 3	0
Transfers out of Level 3	0
Ending balance, March 31, 2012	$3,899,844

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, are summarized in the following table:

	March 31, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
Loans held for sale	$0	$434,875	$0	$434,875
Other real estate owned	0	632,355	0	632,355
Impaired loans	0	14,209,623	0	14,209,623
Total Assets	$0	$15,276,853	$0	$15,276,853
	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
Loans held for sale	$0	$485,926	$0	$485,926
Other real estate owned	0	801,689	0	801,689
Impaired loans	0	13,260,619	0	13,260,619
Total Assets	$0	$14,548,234	$0	$14,548,234

The table below summarizes fair value of financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	Carrying	Fair	Carrying	Fair
	Amount	Value	Amount	Value
(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and federal funds sold	$27,464	$27,464	$42,093	$42,093
Investment securities	76,787	76,787	67,611	67,611
Loans, net of allowance for credit losses	295,003	294,483	291,254	291,427
Loans held for sale	435	435	486	486
Bank owned life insurance	7,150	7,150	7,083	7,083
Other investments, at cost	3,107	3,107	4,405	4,405
TOTAL	$409,946	$409,426	$412,932	$413,105
Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$324,922	$325,980	$327,793	$328,864
Borrowings	39,683	41,801	40,041	41,935
TOTAL	$364,605	$367,781	$367,834	$370,799

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited)
Financial Highlights
	1st Qtr	4th Qtr	3rd Qtr	2nd Qtr	1st Qtr
(In thousands, except per share data)	2012	2011	2011	2011	2011
Operating Results
Interest income	$4,305	$4,340	$4,406	$4,512	$4,619
Interest expense	896	946	1,003	1,052	1,103
Net interest income	3,409	3,394	3,403	3,460	3,516
Provision for credit losses	150	150	150	150	150
Noninterest income	596	539	484	509	491
Noninterest expense	2,572	2,328	2,514	2,567	2,576
Net income	849	982	848	868	913
Per Share Data
Net income per share	$7.14	$8.26	$7.13	$7.30	$7.68
Book value per share	$479.09	$471.11	$470.88	$462.89	$460.25
Financial Condition (1)
Total Loans	$301,606	$297,832	$295,511	$293,855	$299,539
Allowance for credit losses	6,603	6,578	6,518	6,388	6,717
Investment securities	76,787	67,611	65,757	68,547	63,934
Assets	422,731	425,986	412,560	410,023	412,803
Deposits	324,922	327,793	315,232	310,210	313,393
Other borrowed funds	39,683	40,041	39,759	42,609	43,363
Stockholders' equity	56,804	56,023	55,996	55,045	54,732
Financial Ratios
Return on average equity	5.99%	7.14%	6.20%	6.41%	6.86%
Return on average assets	0.80%	0.96%	0.83%	0.85%	0.89%
Interest rate spread	3.17%	3.37%	3.29%	3.33%	3.40%
Average equity to average assets	13.39%	13.23%	13.37%	13.22%	12.94%
Allowance for credit losses
to total loans (1)	2.19%	2.21%	2.21%	2.17%	2.24%
Non-performing loans to allowance for
credit losses (1)	137%	132%	125%	112%	117%
(1) As of the period ending.

Forward Looking Statements

This report may contain certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation, statements regarding results of operations, the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses, the amounts of charge-offs and recoveries, capital to asset ratios, capacity for paying dividends and liquidity. These statements speak of DBI's plans, goals, beliefs or expectations, and refer to estimates or use of similar terms. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified because they contain words and phrases such as "may," "project," "are confident," "should," "predict," "believe," "plan," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual results may differ from DBI's expectations. The factors that, among others, could impact current and future performance include but are not limited to: (i) adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses; (ii) adverse changes in the local economy; (iii) fluctuations in market rates and prices which can negatively affect net interest margin, asset valuations and expense expectations; (iv) changes in regulatory requirements of federal and state agencies applicable to banks and bank holding companies; and (v) the factors set forth in Item 1A of DBI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the "2011 Annual Report"), which item is incorporated herein by reference, as well as other risks identified in this Report. When reviewing forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to DBI, investors and others are cautioned to consider these and other risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements contained in this report are based upon information presently available and DBI assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act") into law. This legislation makes extensive changes to the laws regulating financial services firms and requires significant rulemaking. In addition, the legislation mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action. While the full effects of the legislation on DBI and DSB cannot yet be determined, this legislation is generally perceived as negatively impacting the banking industry. This legislation may result in higher compliance and other costs, reduced revenues and higher capital and liquidity requirements, among other things, which could adversely affect DBI's and DSB's business.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies of DBI are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to general practices in the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available at the date of the financial statements. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Management believes that DBI's critical accounting policies are those relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses, the valuation of investment securities and intangible assets.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALL") is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. Please refer to the Allowance for Loan Losses section of Note 3 - Loans above for detail on the allowance methodology. Management believes the ALL is appropriate as of March 31, 2012.

Valuation of Investment Securities

Investment securities are classified as available-for-sale and are valued at their fair market value. Please refer to Note 2 - Investment Securities and Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement for additional details on the valuation of investment securities.

Other Real Estate Owned

Real estate that DBI has taken control of in partial or full satisfaction of debt is valued at the lower of book value or market value. Please refer to Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement for additional information on the accounting polices related to the valuation of other real estate owned.

Glossary of Loan Terms

Impaired Loan - A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that not all amounts due will be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured at the estimated fair value of the collateral. If the estimated fair value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized by creating a valuation allowance.

Nonaccrual Loan - DSB's policy is to place in nonaccrual status all loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to any payment of principal or interest and all other loans for which reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal based on management's view of the financial condition of the borrower. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.

Non-Performing Assets - Non-performing assets include nonaccrual loans as defined above and real and personal properties acquired in satisfaction of debts previously owed.

Past Due Accruing Loans - A loan on which all or part of a scheduled payment is delinquent by more than 30 days but less than 90 days, except loans that are considered nonaccrual.

Potential Problem Loans - Potential problem loans are accruing loans in which there exists doubt as to the ability of the borrower to comply with present loan repayment terms. Management's decision to place loans in this category does not necessarily mean that DBI expects losses to occur on these loans, but that management recognizes that a higher degree of risk is associated with these accruing loans and they deserve closer scrutiny.

Restructured Loans - Restructured loans involve the granting of some concession to the borrower involving the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in the payment schedule, the amortization term, the interest rate, or a combination of these.

Risk Rating - Risk rating, which is also sometimes referred to as loan grade, is the credit quality grade assigned to each loan. Loans are assigned a risk rating upon origination. Lenders and credit review analysts conduct periodic reviews and evaluations and make adjustments to the assigned grades when appropriate. The range of categories from the best quality to the worst is as follows: highest quality, solid quality, some weakness, inherent industry weakness, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Impaired loans are generally rated a substandard or lower risk rating.

Special Mention Loans - Loans classified "special mention" are one step above substandard loans as described below. These loans contain some weaknesses, which if not corrected or improved upon could lead to further deterioration and a lower rating.

Substandard - A "substandard" loan is a loan that is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or the value of the collateral. Loans classified "substandard" have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize prospects for liquidation and are characterized by the distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Results of Operations

Net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, was $0.8 million, a decline of $0.1 million or 7.0 % from $0.9 million for the corresponding period in 2011. This decrease was primarily the result of $0.1 million reduction in net interest income from the same period during 2011.

Net interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 was $3.4 million, compared to $3.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, a decline of $0.1 million or 3.0%. The following tables set forth a summary of the changes in average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as well as the amount of interest earned and interest paid with the resulting average yield or rate:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
($000s)	Average	Income	Average	Average	Income	Average
	Daily	and	Yield or	Daily	and	Yield or
	Balance	Expense	Rate	Balance	Expense	Rate
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1) (2)	$299,896	$3,790	5.06%	$298,698	$3,992	5.35%
Investment securities: (3)
Taxable securities	56,803	278	1.96%	38,901	245	2.52%
Nontaxable securities (2)	15,533	295	7.59%	25,249	491	7.78%
Federal funds sold	13,627	5	0.14%	16,298	8	0.18%
Other investments	18,128	41	0.91%	8,991	54	2.39%
Total earning assets	$403,987	$4,409	4.37%	$388,137	$4,790	4.94%
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$22,541	$10	0.18%	$22,456	$11	0.19%
Savings accounts	21,319	16	0.30%	20,048	18	0.35%
Money market accounts	137,917	211	0.61%	118,726	239	0.81%
Time deposits	105,135	398	1.51%	118,267	554	1.87%
Other borrowed funds	39,674	261	2.63%	44,007	281	2.55%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$326,586	$896	1.10%	$323,504	$1,103	1.36%
Net interest income and rate spread		$3,513	3.27%		$3,687	3.58%

(1) Nonaccrual loans are included in the average daily balance figure, but interest income associated with these loans is recognized under the cash basis method of accounting.

(2) The yield on tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a fully taxable equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 34%.

(3) Securities are shown at amortized cost.

The decline in net interest income for the quarter-ended March 31, 2012 was primarily due to a 29 basis point decline in the yield on loans and securities along with a $9.7 million decline in the average balance of tax-exempt municipal securities. The net interest rate spread on a tax equivalent basis declined 31 basis points during this period from 3.58% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 to 3.27% for the most recent quarter. DBI's yield on earning assets declined 57 basis points from 4.94% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 to 4.37% as of the quarter ended March 31, 2012. The yields on taxable securities, loans and tax-exempt securities declined 56 basis points, 29 basis points and 19 basis points, respectively when comparing the current quarter with the same period of 2011. This reduction in the yield on earning assets was partially offset by a decline in the cost of funds of 26 basis points from 1.36% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 to 1.10% during the first quarter of 2012. This reduction in the cost of funds was primarily impacted by a 36 basis point reduction in the rate and $13.1 million decline in average balances on certificates of deposits.

For the first quarters of 2012 and 2011, DBI's provision for credit losses was $0.2 million. Net charge-offs of $0.1 million were recognized in the first quarter of 2012 compared to net charge-offs of $0.3 million during the corresponding period in 2011.

Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased $0.1 million compared to the corresponding period in 2011, an increase of 21.4%. The primary reason for the improvement is due to an increase in service fees and commissions of $0.1 million during the first quarter of 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011. This is the result of a bonus insurance commission payment of $0.1 million from DSB's credit-life insurance carrier that was paid during March 2012. The bonus was paid as compensation for insurance policy sales levels realized in recent years and it will not be a recurring payment.

Noninterest expense remained stable for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared to the first quarter of 2011 at $2.5 million. FDIC insurance expense was reduced by $0.1 million for the first quarter of 2012 versus the comparable quarter of 2011. The lower FDIC insurance premiums resulted from a new premium structure implemented by the FDIC effective April 1, 2011. Occupancy expenses were slightly lower during the current period due in part to a reduction in depreciation expense compared to with the same period in 2011. These expense reductions were offset by nominal increases in salaries and employee benefits of $64,716 and data processing of $44,334 for the first three months of 2012 compared to the first three months of 2011.

Additional OTTI credit loss was recognized during the most recent quarter on the two securities previously determined to be other-than-temporarily-impaired. The credit loss recognized through the income statement was $32,875 during the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $24,474 recognized during the first quarter of 2011 on one of the two securities.

For both the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, DBI recorded combined federal and state income tax expense of $0.4 million. These provisions reflect effective income tax rates of 34% for the first quarter of 2012 and 29% for the first quarter of 2011. DBI's combined statutory tax rate is 39%. The lower effective income tax rates are primarily due to certain federally tax exempt interest earned on state and local government investment securities.

Financial Condition

Total assets decreased by $3.3 million between December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012. Cash, cash equivalents and fed funds sold decreased by $14.6 million since December 31, 2011, while other investments declined $1.3 million during the same period. Increases in investment securities of $9.2 million and loans of $3.8 million during the first three months of 2012 partially offset these declines.

The following table sets forth major types of loans, excluding loans held for sale, by primary collateral and the percentage of total loans for each type:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
$(000)s	Amount	%	Amount	%
Real Estate:
Residential	$72,878	24.2%	$72,656	24.4%
Commercial	61,453	20.4%	60,865	20.4%
Agricultural	78,827	26.1%	78,768	26.5%
Construction	11,828	3.9%	11,655	3.9%
	$224,986	74.6%	$223,944	75.2%
Commercial	38,992	12.9%	35,178	11.8%
Agricultural	27,362	9.1%	27,661	9.3%
Consumer and other	10,266	3.4%	11,049	3.7%
TOTAL	$301,606	100.0%	$297,832	100.0%

During 2011, management made the decision to purchase government guaranteed loans given the lack of quality loan growth potential currently available within DSB's lending market. As of March 31, 2012 there were approximately $11.7 million of government guaranteed loans recorded, of which $8.0 million are secured by agricultural real estate and $3.7 million by commercial real estate. The average maturity of the loans purchased is approximately 10 years. The premiums on the loans are being amortized over a three year period. Management will continue to evaluate DSB's loan portfolio and make additional purchases as deemed appropriate. Management is authorized to invest up to $15 million in government guaranteed loan purchases.

The allowance for loan losses remained stable during the first quarter of 2012 at $6.6 million. Provisions of $150,000 were added to the allowance in the first three months of 2012 and were partially offset by net charge-offs of approximately $125,000 during the period. The allowance equals 2.19% of total loans as of March 31, 2012 compared to 2.21% at December 31, 2011. Nonaccrual loans totaled $9.1 million at March 31, 2012, an increase of approximately $0.4 million compared to nonaccrual loans of $8.7 million at December 31, 2011.

The following table sets forth nonaccrual loans by major category:

	March 31,	December 31,
$(000)s	2012	2011
Secured By Real Estate:
Residential	$2,262	$2,195
Agricultural	0	0
Commercial	3,063	2,299
Construction	2,949	3,364
Subtotal Real Estate Loans	8,274	7,858
Secured by commercial assets	584	563
Secured by agricultural assets	0	0
Secured by other assets	200	235
TOTAL	$9,058	$8,656

DBI's ratio of loans more than 30 days past due (including nonaccrual loans) to total loans was 3.49% at March 31, 2012, compared to 3.58% at year-end 2011. As of March 31, 2012, management had identified $37.2 million of potential problem loans compared to $38.2 million at year-end 2011. Loan quality continues to be a concern and improving the portfolio is the primary focus for management. DBI has no accruing loans that are past due 90 days or more.

DBI's investment in other real estate (property acquired through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans) decreased $0.2 million in the first three months of 2012. At March 31, 2012 the balance in other real estate comprised three construction/land development properties totaling $0.3 million, one property secured by agricultural-related real estate with an estimated value of $0.2 million and four residential real estate properties with an estimated value of $0.1 million. This compares to the seven parcels held at year-end 2011 consisting of $0.3 million in construction/land development properties, $0.2 million in commercial real estate, $0.2 million in agricultural-related real estate and $0.1 million in residential real estate.

The following table sets forth certain data concerning nonaccrual loans, past due accruing loans, restructured loans and other real estate:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
		% of Total		% of Total
$(000)s	Amount	Loans	Amount	Loans
Nonaccrual Loans (1)	$9,058	3.0%	$8,656	2.9%
Restructured Accruing Loans	4,446	1.5%	4,449	1.4%
Accruing Loans Past Due
90 Days or More	0	0.0%	0	0.0%
Total	$13,504	4.5%	$13,105	4.3%
Other Real Estate	$632		$802

(1) Includes restructured loans of $4.3 million as of both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Total deposits declined $2.9 million at March 31, 2012 compared to balances at December 31, 2011. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased by $7.9 million, or 16.6%, during the first three months of 2012. Interest-bearing deposits increased $5.0 million or 1.8% between December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012. Money market accounts increased $5.5 million or 4.2% during the first three months of 2012 and savings accounts increased $1.3 million or 6.3% during the same period. The trend in money market balances continues to increase given the current rate environment and depositors reluctance to commit to long-term rates. NOW account balances decreased $0.9 million or 4.2% since year-end 2011, while certificates of deposit also fell $0.9 million, or 0.8%, during the first quarter of 2012. Given the current interest rate environment, there has been a shift away from certificates of deposit into money market accounts as customers are reluctant to lock into a rate at this time. DBI's money market rates are comparable to its rates for short-term certificates of deposit.

Interest-bearing deposits consisted of the following:

$(000)s	3/31/2012	12/31/2011
NOW accounts	$21,348	$22,278
Savings accounts	22,466	21,129
Money market accounts	136,443	130,959
Certificates of deposit	105,071	105,957
TOTAL	$285,328	$280,323

Short-term borrowings decreased $0.4 million or 3.0% as of March 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. Loan volume for DACC was relatively stable during the first quarter of 201,2 thereby eliminating the need to advance funds against the line of credit at Agribank, FCB. Long-term borrowings remained unchanged since year-end 2011.

Capital Resources

Stockholders' equity increased by $0.8 million to $56.8 million as of March 31, 2012 from $56.0 million at December 31, 2011 due primarily to earnings for the period of $0.8 million and a decrease in other comprehensive loss of $0.1 million that were partially offset by the purchase of treasury stock of $0.1 million. As of March 31, 2012 DBI's leverage ratio was 13.5%, its risk-based core capital ratio was 18.4% and its risk-based total capital ratio was 19.6%. As of March 31, 2012, DSB's leverage ratio was 10.6% and its risk-based total capital ratio was 16.1%. DBI and DSB continue to maintain capital levels well above regulatory minimum levels established for "well-capitalized" institutions. DBI believes its and DSB's capital positions as March 31, 2012 are adequate under current economic conditions.

Liquidity

Liquidity refers to the ability of DBI to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs. DBI maintains liquid assets and established lines of credit to meet its liquidity needs. DBI's Board of Directors annually approves a Consolidated Contingent Liquidity Plan, which reviews the sources and uses of liquidity for DBI, DSB and DACC. Cash, cash equivalents and federal funds sold decreased $14.6 million or 34.8% to $27.5 million during the first three months of 2012 primarily due to the increases in investment securities of $9.2 million and loans of $3.8 million during this period. The major sources and uses of cash are detailed in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

In addition to on-balance sheet sources of funds, DBI also has off-balance sheet sources available to meet liquidity needs. Specifically, DBI has unused lines of credit of $48.3 million as of March 31, 2012. This includes a $20.0 million line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago that was established in 1999. DSB has not borrowed on this line. DBI also has $91.4 million of eligible loans and securities that could be pledged to increase its available credit. Management believes DBI's and DSB's liquidity positions as of March 31, 2012 are adequate under current economic conditions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

DBI and its subsidiaries are parties to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of their customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial condition. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement DBI and its subsidiaries have in particular classes of financial instruments.

The exposure of DBI and its subsidiaries to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of these instruments. DBI and its subsidiaries use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance sheet instruments. DBI and its subsidiaries require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk. The following table sets forth DBI's commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit:

	Contract or
	Notional Amount	Secured
(In thousands)	March 31, 2012	Portion
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$45,515	$40,868
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written	1,513	1,513

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. DBI and its subsidiaries evaluate each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by DSB to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support commercial business transactions. When a customer fails to perform according to the terms of the agreement, DSB honors drafts drawn by the third party in amounts up to the contract amount. A majority of the letters of credit expire within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties and residential properties. All letters of credit are fully collateralized.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

DBI's primary market risk position has not materially changed from that disclosed in DBI's 2011 Annual Report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, DBI's management, under the supervision and with the participation of DBI's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated DBI's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, DBI's principal executive officer and principal financial officer believe that DBI's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

There were no significant changes in DBIss internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that have significantly affected those controls during the fiscal quarter covered by this Report, including any correction actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Item 1A - Risk Factors of DBI's 2011 Annual Report, which could materially affect DBI's business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes in risk factors as described in such Report.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

DBI did not sell any equity securities during the first quarter of 2012 that were not registered under the Securities Act.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, DBI's activity of equity security shares repurchased was as follows:

	Total		Total Number of Shares	Maximum Number of Shares
	Number Of Shares	Average Price Paid	Purchased as Part of Publicly	That May Yet Be Purchased
Period	Purchased (1)	Per Share	Announced Plans	Under the Plan
January 1-31	0	$0	0	N/A
February 1-29	0	$0	0	N/A
March 1-31	349	$420	349	N/A
(1) - On February 21, 2012, the Board of Directors of DBI approved the repurchase of up to 714 common shares
in open market transactions. The approval of repurchases was for February 12, 2012 through March 31, 2012.

The Federal Reserve Board ("the Board") has adopted regulations that deal with the measure of capitalization for bank holding companies. The Board has also issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, wherein the Board has stated that a bank holding company experiencing earnings weaknesses should not pay cash dividends exceeding its net income or which could only be funded in ways that weaken the bank holding company's financial health, such as by borrowing.

The ability of DBI to pay dividends on its common stock is largely dependent upon the ability of DSB to pay dividends on its stock held by DBI. DSB's ability to pay dividends is restricted by both state and federal laws and regulations. DSB is subject to policies and regulations issued by the FDIC and the Division of Banking of the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions ("the Division"), which, in part, establish minimum acceptable capital requirements for banks, thereby limiting the ability of such banks to pay dividends. In addition, Wisconsin law provides that state chartered banks may declare and pay dividends out of undivided profits but only after provision has been made for all expenses, losses, required reserves, taxes and interest accrued or due from the bank. Payments of dividends in some circumstances may require the written consent of the Division.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:

31.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text. *

* As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

Date: May 4, 2012 /s/ John P. Olsen

John P. Olsen

President and CEO

Date: May 4, 2012 /s/ Dennis J. Heim

Dennis J. Heim

Vice President, CFO and Treasurer

EX-31

EX-31

DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dennis J. Heim, Vice President, CFO and Treasurer of Denmark Bancshares, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Denmark Bancshares, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

	/s/ Dennis J. Heim
Date: May 4, 2012	Dennis J. Heim
	Vice President, CFO and Treasurer

EX-32

DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Denmark Bancshares, Inc. ("DBI"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DBI for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DBI.

/s/ John P. Olsen

John P. Olsen,

President and CEO

/s/ Dennis J. Heim

Dennis J. Heim

Vice President, CFO and Treasurer

Date: May 4, 2012

XML

NOTE 3 - LOANS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Finance, Loans and Leases Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block]

NOTE 3 - LOANS

Loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of the allowance for credit losses. Interest on loans is calculated and accrued by using the simple interest method on the daily balance of the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees are credited to income when received and the related loan origination costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalization of the fees net of the related costs would not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

DBI's customer information system tracks the past due status of all loans beginning with the first day a payment is late. On a weekly basis, lenders are given a report with all loans past due one day or more to allow them to actively monitor the portfolio and attempt to keep past due levels to a minimum.

All loans are given an internal risk rating when the loan is originated. On a quarterly basis, risk rating reports are distributed to the lenders to ensure that loans are appropriately rated. On an annual basis, all commercial loans over $100,000 and agricultural loans over $200,000 are reviewed by the loan officer and/or credit analyst. All loans over $1 million are independently reviewed annually by the Chief Credit Officer. An independent third party also performs periodic reviews of risk ratings to ensure that loans are accurately graded. The internal risk ratings are defined as:

• Non-classified loans are assigned a risk rating of 1 - 4, with a one-rated credit being the highest quality. Non-classified loans have credit quality that ranges from well above average quality to some inherent industry weaknesses that may present higher than average risk due to conditions affecting the borrower, the borrower's industry or economic environment.
• Special mention loans are assigned a risk rating of 5. Potential weaknesses exist that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of repayment prospects or in DSB's credit position at some future date.
• Substandard loans are assigned a rating of 6. These loans are inadequately protected by the current worth and borrowing capacity of the borrower. Well-defined weaknesses exist that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. There is a possibility of some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. At this point, the loan may still be performing and accruing.
• Doubtful loans are rated 7 and have all the weaknesses of a substandard credit plus the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of current facts, conditions and values highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high but because of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors, which may work to the advantage of strengthening the asset, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status can be determined.
• Loss loans are internally rated as an 8. A loss amount has been determined and this has been charged-off against the allowance for loan losses. All or a portion of the charge-off may be recovered in the future and any such recoveries would also be recorded through the allowance.

DBI's policy is to place into nonaccrual status all loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more, along with other loans as to which reasonable doubt exists to the full and timely collection of principal and/or interest based on management's view of the financial condition of the borrower. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.

Loan charge-offs for all loans will occur as soon as there is a reasonable probability of loss. When the amount of the loss can be readily calculated, the charge-off will be recorded as soon as practical within the calendar quarter the loss was identified. Loans that are partially charged-off will be placed in nonaccrual status unless the remaining loan is restructured with adequate collateral and payments are assured and current.

A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that not all amounts due will be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Interest income is recognized in the same manner described above for nonaccrual loans. Further detail on the analysis of impaired loans can be found below in the discussion of the Allowance for Loan Losses, below.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that have been incurred in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic accounting principles: (1) FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 310-10 "Receivables - Overall," (formerly FAS 114), which requires that losses be accrued when it is probable that DBI will not collect all principal and interest payments according to the loan's contractual terms, and (2) FASB ASC Topic 450, "Contingencies," (formerly FAS 5), which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable. The FFIEC "Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses" provides additional guidance on the allowance methodology.

On a quarterly basis, management utilizes a systematic methodology to determine an appropriate allowance for loan losses. This methodology includes a loan grading system that requires quarterly reviews; identification of loans to be evaluated on an individual basis for impairment; results of independent reviews of asset quality and the adequacy of the allowance by regulatory agencies; consideration of current trends and volumes of nonperforming, past-due, nonaccrual and potential problem loans; as well as national and local economic trends and industry conditions.

In applying the methodology, all troubled debt restructurings, regardless of size, are considered impaired and will be individually evaluated. All nonaccrual and watchlist commercial real estate, construction and land development, agricultural real estate, multifamily residential real estate, commercial, and agricultural production loans over $50,000 are evaluated individually to determine if they are impaired. Nonaccrual residential real estate or consumer loans that are larger than customary for DBI will also be considered impaired and evaluated individually as there would be no pool of similar loans to evaluate these loans under ASC Topic 450. Impaired loans are measured at the estimated fair value of the collateral. If the estimated fair value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized by creating a valuation allowance in conjunction with ASC Topic 310-10.

Loans that are not impaired are segmented into groups by type of loan. The following loan types are utilized so each segment of loans will have similar risk factors: (1) residential real estate, (2) agricultural real estate, (3) commercial real estate, (4) construction and land development, (5) commercial, (6) agricultural, (7) consumer, (8) guaranteed loans and (9) other. These loans are further segmented by internal risk ratings of non-classified, special mention, substandard and doubtful, which are defined above.

Risk factor percentages are applied to the risk rating segments of the non-impaired loans to calculate an allowance allocation in conjunction with ASC Topic 450. The risk factor percentages are based on historical loan loss experience for each loan type and are adjusted for current economic conditions and trends as well as internal loan quality trends. The historical loan loss percentages are applied to the non-classified portion of the portfolio to determine the required allocation to the allowance. The historical loan loss percentages are then multiplied by a factor based on current economic conditions to calculate the allocation for each of the remaining risk rating categories of the non-impaired loans. The current economic conditions take into account items such as vacancy rates for rental properties; property values based on actual sales transactions; income projections based on current prices such as dairy commodities; and other available economic data.

The above steps result in calculations that estimate the credit losses inherent in the portfolio at that time. The calculations are used to confirm the adequacy and appropriateness of the actual balance of the allowance, recognizing that the allowance represents an aggregation of judgments and estimates by management. Such calculations will influence the amount of future provisions for loan losses charged to expense.

The calculation is submitted to DSB's Board of Directors quarterly along with a recommendation for the amount of the monthly provision to the allowance. If the mix and amount of future charge-offs differ significantly from those assumptions used by management in making its determination, the allowance and provision expense could be materially affected.

Major categories of loans included in the loan portfolio are as follows:

	March 31,	December 31,
	2012	2011
Real Estate:
Residential	$72,878,120	$72,655,569
Commercial	61,453,156	60,864,761
Agricultural	78,826,886	78,767,692
Construction	11,828,100	11,655,550
	224,986,262	223,943,572
Commercial	38,992,273	35,178,049
Agricultural	27,361,390	27,661,420
Consumer and other	10,266,198	11,049,075
TOTAL	$301,606,123	$297,832,116

The following table presents information related to the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011:

		Three months ended		Three months ended
		March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011
	$(000)s	Average	Interest	Average	Interest
		Recorded	Income	Recorded	Income
		Investment	Recognized	Investment	Recognized
With no related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,601	$4	$930	$7
Commercial Real Estate		2,366	8	1,933	13
Construction & Land Dev		2,264	14	2,590	29
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	0
Commercial		757	2	577	8
Agricultural		0	0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	0	0
With a related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,042	$5	$979	$0
Commercial Real Estate		2,738	7	4,533	0
Construction & Land Dev		2,832	1	1,915	21
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	0
Commercial		41	0	62	0
Agricultural		0	0	116	0
Consumer		143	0	149	0
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$2,643	$9	$1,909	$7
Commercial Real Estate		5,104	15	6,466	13
Construction & Land Dev		5,096	15	4,505	50
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	0
Commercial		798	2	639	8
Agricultural		0	0	116	0
Consumer		143	0	149	0
	Total	$13,784	$41	$13,784	$78

The following tables show the investment in impaired loans and the corresponding allowance for those loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Impaired Loans

	$(000)s		Unpaid
		Recorded	Principal	Related
March 31, 2012		Investment	Balance	Allowance
With no related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,456	$1,594	$0
Commercial Real Estate		2,085	2,359	0
Construction & Land Dev		2,238	2,238	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		748	795	0
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	0
With a related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$945	$1,040	$150
Commercial Real Estate		2,585	2,730	697
Construction & Land Dev		2,831	2,831	579
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		37	41	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		140	142	127
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$2,401	$2,634	$150
Commercial Real Estate		4,670	5,089	697
Construction & Land Dev		5,069	5,069	579
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		785	836	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		140	142	127
	Total	$13,065	$13,770	$1,567

	$(000)s		Unpaid
		Recorded	Principal	Related
December 31, 2011		Investment	Balance	Allowance
With no related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$805	$841	$0
Commercial Real Estate		1,433	1,698	0
Construction & Land Dev		2,658	2,658	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		890	935	0
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		43	43	0
With a related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,190	$1,392	$171
Commercial Real Estate		2,482	2,615	721
Construction & Land Dev		2,832	2,832	580
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		38	41	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		142	144	129
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$1,995	$2,233	$171
Commercial Real Estate		3,915	4,313	721
Construction & Land Dev		5,490	5,490	580
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		928	976	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		185	187	129
	Total	$12,513	$13,199	$1,615

Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables

		March 31,
		2012		2011		December 31, 2011
			Ending Balance		Ending Balance		Ending Balance
			Individually		Individually		Individually
	$(000)s	Ending	Evaluated	Ending	Evaluated	Ending	Evaluated
		Balance	for Impairment	Balance	for Impairment	Balance	for Impairment
Residential Real Estate		$72,878	$2,401	$76,730	$1,646	$72,656	$1,995
Commercial Real Estate		61,453	4,670	58,665	6,321	60,865	3,915
Construction & Land Dev		11,828	5,069	12,899	4,497	11,655	5,490
Agricultural Real Estate		78,827	0	69,909	0	78,768	0
Commercial		38,992	785	45,591	665	35,178	928
Agricultural		27,362	0	25,383	116	27,661	0
Consumer		10,266	140	10,362	148	11,049	185
Unallocated		0	0	0	0	0	0
Total		$301,606	$13,065	$299,539	$13,393	$297,832	$12,513

Allowance for Loan Losses

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

	$(000)s						Ending Balance
		Beginning				Ending	Individually
		Balance				Balance	Evaluated
2012		1/1/2012	Charge-offs	Recoveries	Provision	3/31/2012	for Impairment
Residential Real Estate		$1,132	($134)	$4	$187	$1,189	$150
Commercial Real Estate		2,858	0	3	(8)	2,853	697
Construction & Land Dev		1,163	0	0	54	1,217	579
Agricultural Real Estate		198	0	0	3	201	0
Commercial		202	0	6	21	229	14
Agricultural		263	0	0	(8)	255	0
Consumer		150	(6)	2	0	146	127
Unallocated		612	0	0	(99)	513	0
Total		$6,578	($140)	$15	$150	$6,603	$1,567
							Ending Balance
	$(000)s	Beginning				Ending	Individually
		Balance				Balance	Evaluated
2011		1/1/2011	Charge-offs	Recoveries	Provision	3/31/2011	for Impairment
Residential Real Estate		$1,429	($29)	$6	($10)	$1,396	$171
Commercial Real Estate		2,849	0	2	271	3,122	1,132
Construction & Land Dev		880	(65)	0	39	854	41
Agricultural Real Estate		204	0	0	(9)	195	0
Commercial		278	(225)	11	242	306	26
Agricultural		347	0	2	(115)	234	97
Consumer		160	(1)	1	(3)	157	135
Unallocated		718	0	0	(265)	453	0
Total		$6,865	($320)	$22	$150	$6,717	$1,602

Nonaccrual loans totaled $9.1 million and $8.7 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. There were no loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing. A schedule of loans by the number of days past due (including nonaccrual loans) along with a schedule of credit quality indicators follows:

Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables

		30-89 Days	90 Days	Total		Total Financing
	$(000)s	Past Due	& Over	Past Due	Current	Receivables
	March 31, 2012
Residential Real Estate		$1,295	$897	$2,192	$70,686	$72,878
Commercial Real Estate		389	1,226	1,615	59,838	61,453
Construction & Land Dev		14	1,023	1,037	10,791	11,828
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	78,827	78,827
Commercial		393	317	710	38,282	38,992
Agricultural		0	0	0	27,362	27,362
Consumer		28	36	64	10,202	10,266
	Total	$2,119	$3,499	$5,618	$295,988	$301,606

		30-89 Days	90 Days	Total		Total Financing
	$(000)s	Past Due	& Over	Past Due	Current	Receivables
	December 31, 2011
Residential Real Estate		$1,319	$866	$2,185	$70,471	$72,656
Commercial Real Estate		1,103	1,074	2,177	58,688	60,865
Construction & Land Dev		0	1,452	1,452	10,203	11,655
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	78,768	78,768
Commercial		185	200	385	34,793	35,178
Agricultural		0	0	0	27,661	27,661
Consumer		63	81	144	10,905	11,049
	Total	$2,670	$3,673	$6,343	$291,489	$297,832

Credit Quality Indicators

	$(000)s		Special
	March 31, 2012	Non-Classified	Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Total
Residential Real Estate		$59,803	$5,608	$5,330	$2,137	$72,878
Commercial Real Estate		48,687	4,944	4,463	3,359	61,453
Construction & Land Dev		5,128	1,058	2,999	2,643	11,828
Agricultural Real Estate		71,002	7,825	0	0	78,827
Commercial		36,597	994	1,214	187	38,992
Agricultural		23,821	3,541	0	0	27,362
Consumer		9,979	86	38	163	10,266
Total		$255,017	$24,056	$14,044	$8,489	$301,606
	$(000)s		Special
	December 31, 2011	Non-Classified	Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Total
Residential Real Estate		$58,960	$6,277	$6,501	$918	$72,656
Commercial Real Estate		49,547	3,668	4,787	2,863	60,865
Construction & Land Dev		4,691	898	4,154	1,912	11,655
Agricultural Real Estate		70,412	8,356	0	0	78,768
Commercial		32,600	1,250	1,164	164	35,178
Agricultural		23,779	3,882	0	0	27,661
Consumer		10,678	102	127	142	11,049
Total		$250,667	$24,433	$16,733	$5,999	$297,832

Modifications

As of March 31, 2012

			Pre-Modification	Post-Modification	Recorded	Impact to
	$(000)s	Number of	Recorded	Recorded	Investment	Allowance
		Contracts	Investment	Investment	as of 9/30/2011	for Credit Losses
Residential Real Estate		3	$177	$177	$177	$151

Since December 31, 2011 there were no loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted.

XML

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Investments in Debt and Marketable Equity Securities (and Certain Trading Assets) Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and estimated fair market value of securities available-for-sale were as follows:

	March 31, 2012
		Gross	Gross	Estimated
	Amortized	Unrealized	Unrealized	Fair
	Cost	Gains	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$5,500,000	$10,450	($15,600)	$5,494,850
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	39,628,939	620,228	(51,036)	40,198,131
State and local governments	24,083,233	1,048,271	(136,314)	24,995,190
Residential mortgage-backed securities	8,133,171	24,746	(2,058,733)	6,099,184
	$77,345,343	$1,703,695	($2,261,683)	$76,787,355
	December 31, 2011
		Gross	Gross	Estimated
	Amortized	Unrealized	Unrealized	Fair
	Cost	Gains	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$3,500,000	$17,050	$0	$3,517,050
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	31,729,409	505,292	(8,172)	32,226,529
State and local governments	24,628,519	1,032,038	(192,058)	25,468,499
Residential mortgage-backed securities	8,537,737	26,590	(2,165,712)	6,398,615
	$68,395,665	$1,580,970	($2,365,942)	$67,610,693

Proceeds of $3.3 million from normal pay-downs, $1.0 million from calls and $0.5 million from maturities were received during the first quarter of 2012. Purchases of $11.1 million of agency mortgage-backed securities ("MBS"), $2.0 million of agencies and $0.8 million of taxable municipals were made during this same period.

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities at March 31, 2012, by maturity were as follows:

	Securities Available-for-Sale
		Estimated
	Amortized	Fair
Amounts Maturing	Cost	Value
Within one year	$2,684,867	$2,753,922
From one through five years	40,162,778	39,957,488
From five through ten years	21,450,486	21,216,280
After ten years	13,047,212	12,859,665
	$77,345,343	$76,787,355

MBS are allocated according to their expected prepayments rather than their contractual maturities. Certain state and local governments' securities are allocated according to their put date. Fair values of securities are estimated based on financial models or prices paid for similar securities. It is possible interest rates could change considerably resulting in a material change in the estimated fair value of the securities.

At March 31, 2012, twenty debt securities have unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 10.4% from DSB's amortized cost basis. Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position follows:

March 31, 2012	Less Than Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
	Gross	Estimated	Gross	Estimated
	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair
Securities Available for Sale	Losses	Value	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$15,600	$1,984,400	$0	$0
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	51,036	8,879,481	0	0
State and local governments	24,886	1,518,591	111,428	1,875,195
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	0	2,058,733	5,192,342
Total securities available for sale	$91,522	$12,382,472	$2,170,161	$7,067,537
December 31, 2011	Less Than Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
	Gross	Estimated	Gross	Estimated
	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair
Securities Available for Sale	Losses	Value	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	$8,172	$2,388,919	$0	$0
State and local governments	14,144	817,753	177,914	1,808,504
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	0	2,165,712	5,359,064
Total securities available for sale	$22,316	$3,206,672	$2,343,626	$7,167,568

All securities with unrealized losses are assessed to determine if the impairment is other-than-temporary. Factors that are evaluated include the mortgage loan types supporting the securities, delinquency and foreclosure rates, credit support, weighted average loan-to-value, and year of origination, among others.

Currently, a quarterly analysis by a third party is performed on three residential MBS secured by non-traditional loan types in order to determine whether they are other-than-temporarily impaired ("OTTI"). The purpose of the third party evaluation is to determine if the present value of the expected cash flows is less than the amortized costs, thereby resulting in credit loss, in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance under FASB ASC Topic 320. The third party determines an estimated fair value for each security based on discounted cash flow analyses. The estimates are based on the following key valuation assumptions - collateral cash flows, prepayment assumptions, default rates, loss severity, liquidation lag, bond waterfall and internal rate of return. Since there is currently no active secondary market for these types of securities due to the non-traditional loan types supporting the securities, these valuations are considered Level 3 inputs as defined in Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement. Additional securities may be analyzed in the future if deemed necessary to determine whether they are OTTI and if so, if any possible credit loss exists.

Two of the three securities supported by non-traditional loan types were previously found to have credit losses since a portion of the unrealized losses is due to an expected cash flow shortfall. As such, these securities were determined to be OTTI. DBI does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that DBI will be required to sell the securities before the anticipated recovery of their remaining amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. The analysis on the third security did not reveal any credit loss nor was the security found to be OTTI. The total credit loss that was recognized in earnings through December 31, 2011 was $0.6 million. The analysis performed as of March 31, 2012 resulted in an additional $32,875 of credit loss that was recorded through the income statement during the current period on the two OTTI securities. Unrealized losses on the three securities analyzed by the third party were recognized through accumulated other comprehensive loss on the balance sheet as of March 31, 2012, net of tax, in the amount of $1.2 million.

The unrealized losses on the remainder of the residential MBS are due to the distressed and illiquid markets for collateralized mortgage obligations. The securities are investments in senior tranches with adequate credit support from subordinate tranches, are supported by traditional mortgage loans that originated between 2002 and 2005, have low delinquency and foreclosure rates, and reasonable loan-to-value ratios. DBI does not consider these investments to be OTTI at March 31, 2012.

Changes in credit losses recognized for securities with OTTI were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended		For the Year Ended
	March 31,		December 31,
	2012	2011	2011
Credit losses recognized in earnings, beginning of period	($637,245)	($432,488)	($432,488)
Credit losses for OTTI not previously recognized	(32,875)	(24,474)	(204,757)
Credit losses recognized in earnings, end of period	($670,120)	($456,962)	($637,245)

XML

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$ 20,306,017	$ 21,905,812
Federal funds sold	7,158,000	20,187,000
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value	76,787,355	67,610,693
Loans	301,606,123	297,832,116
Allowance for credit losses	(6,603,188)	(6,578,087)
Net loans	295,002,935	291,254,029
Loans held for sale	434,875	485,926
Premises and equipment, net	7,047,443	7,085,783
Other investments, at cost	3,106,696	4,404,811
Accrued interest receivable	1,392,095	1,244,473
Other assets	11,495,737	11,807,370
TOTAL ASSETS	422,731,153	425,985,897
Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing	39,594,755	47,469,622
Interest-bearing	285,327,600	280,323,469
Total Deposits	324,922,355	327,793,091
Short-term borrowings	11,208,861	11,558,861
Accrued interest payable	333,690	334,178
Other liabilities	988,381	1,794,808
Long-term debt	28,473,699	28,481,999
Total Liabilities	365,926,986	369,962,937
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, no par value, authorized 640,000 shares; outstanding 118,568 shares at 3/31/12 and 118,917 shares at 12/31/11	18,173,975	18,173,975
Treasury stock shares, at cost (2,962 at 3/31/12 and 2,613 at 12/31/11)	(2,272,445)	(2,125,865)
Paid in capital	469,986	469,986
Retained earnings	40,767,444	39,918,706
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(334,793)	(413,842)
Total Stockholders' Equity	56,804,167	56,022,960
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$ 422,731,153	$ 425,985,897

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$ 848,738	$ 912,865
Depreciation	94,782	104,123
Provision for credit losses	150,000	150,000
Amortization of intangibles	48,098	48,098
Gains on sales of loans	(117,804)	(79,741)
Loss on sale of other real estate	59,984	6,520
Loss on investment securities impairment writedowns	32,875	24,474
Amortization of bond premium	175,636	103,464
Accretion of bond discount	(20,196)	(60,630)
Mortgage loans originated for sale	(7,695,636)	(7,517,838)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans	7,863,777	4,082,962
Income from bank owned life insurance	(66,299)	(66,000)
Increase in interest receivable	(147,622)	(154,827)
(Decrease) increase in interest payable	(488)	1,162
Other, net	68,286	(41,627)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities	1,294,131	(2,486,995)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities	4,773,194	5,865,794
Purchases of available-for-sale securities	(13,911,187)	(6,974,158)
Net purchases of money market mutual funds	0	(37,682)
Proceeds from sale of FHLB common stock	1,298,115	0
Federal funds sold, net	13,029,000	2,455,000
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets	206,350	593,279
Net (increase) decrease in loans made to customers	(3,995,192)	6,359,211
Capital expenditures	(56,442)	(5,843)
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities	1,343,838	8,255,601
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net decrease in deposits	(2,870,736)	(7,105,967)
Purchase of treasury stock	(146,580)	0
Dividends paid	(862,148)	(862,148)
Debt proceeds	900,000	1,600,000
Debt repayments	(1,258,300)	(1,825,000)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities	(4,237,764)	(8,193,115)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(1,599,795)	(2,424,509)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning	21,905,812	16,917,728
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING	20,306,017	14,493,219
Noncash Investing Activities:
Loans transferred to foreclosed properties	97,000	109,558
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures:
Cash paid for interest	896,529	821,866
Cash paid for income taxes	$ 425,000	$ 130,980

XML

NOTE 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

NOTE 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited. In the opinion of management, these statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Denmark Bancshares, Inc. ("DBI"), its results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. All adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements are of a normal recurring nature. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in DBI's latest annual report on Form 10-K. DBI's subsidiaries are Denmark State Bank ("DSB"), Denmark Agricultural Credit Corporation ("DACC"), and DBI Properties, Inc. ("Properties").

Reclassifications - Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the current year.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Allowance for loan losses (in Dollars)	$ 6,578,087	$ 6,864,497
Common stock, authorized	640,000	640,000
Common stock, issued	118,568	118,917
Common stock, no par value (in Dollars per share)	$ 0	$ 0
Treasury stock shares	2,962	2,613

XML

Document And Entity Information (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	May 02, 2012	May 01, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	DENMARK BANCSHARES INC
Document Type	10-Q
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		118,568
Entity Public Float			$ 46,277,700
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0000885531
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

Consolidated Statements of Income (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
Interest Income
Loans including fees	$ 3,786,010	$ 3,988,583
Taxable	278,430	244,923
Exempt from federal tax	194,405	324,195
Interest on federal funds sold	4,649	7,469
Other interest income	41,090	53,688
	4,304,584	4,618,858
Interest Expense
Deposits	634,669	822,348
Short-term borrowings	14,854	29,457
Long-term debt	246,426	251,186
	895,949	1,102,991
Net interest income	3,408,635	3,515,867
Provision for Credit Losses	150,000	150,000
Net interest income after provision for credit losses	3,258,635	3,365,867
Other Income
Service fees and commissions	307,511	208,811
Loan sale gains	117,804	79,471
Other	170,323	202,524
	595,638	490,806
Other-than-Temporary Impairment Losses, Net
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses	1,664,868	916,690
Amount in other comprehensive income, before taxes	(1,631,993)	(892,216)
	32,875	24,474
Other Expense
Salaries and employee benefits	1,579,870	1,515,154
Occupancy expenses	228,093	245,035
FDIC Insurance	74,463	165,000
Data processing expenses	242,536	198,202
Professional fees	87,650	97,589
Amortization of intangibles	48,098	48,098
Loss on sale of other real estate	59,984	6,520
Other real estate expenses	18,908	79,580
Other operating expenses	199,533	196,792
	2,539,135	2,551,970
Income before income taxes	1,282,263	1,280,229
Income tax expense	433,525	367,364
NET INCOME	$ 848,738	$ 912,865
Per Share
Net income (in Dollars per share)	$ 7.14	$ 7.68
Dividends declared (in Dollars per share)	$ 0.00	$ 0.00
Weighted average shares outstanding (in Shares)	118,897	118,917

XML

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASURMENT

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASURMENT

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in a transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Some assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis, as required by U.S. GAAP, which also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. The three levels of inputs defined in the standard that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1: Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
• Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
• Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little, if any, market activity. These unobservable inputs reflect estimates that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liability.

DBI used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Federal Funds Sold: For cash, cash equivalents and federal funds sold, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment Securities: Investment securities available-for-sale ("AFS") are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value measurement of most of DBI's AFS securities is currently determined by an independent provider using Level 2 inputs (except as noted below). The measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar assets, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using matrix pricing models, or other model-based valuation techniques requiring observable inputs other than quoted prices such as yield curves, prepayment speed and default rates. Two of DBI's AFS MBS that are secured by non-traditional mortgage loans and one AFS MBS secured by traditional mortgage loans that was previously downgraded were analyzed by a third party in order to determine an estimated fair value. The estimated fair values were based on discounted cash flow analyses and are considered Level 3 inputs.

Refer to Note 2 - Investment Securities for additional detail on the assumptions used in determining the estimated fair values and additional disclosures regarding DBI's investment securities. For other securities held as investments, fair value equals quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

Loans Receivable: The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Loans Held for Sale: Mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value is based on a market commitment for the sale of the loan in the secondary market. These loans are typically sold within one week of funding. DBI classifies mortgage loans held for sale as nonrecurring Level 2 assets.

Impaired Loans: As defined below in the Glossary of Loan Terms section, a loan is considered impaired when, based on current information or events, it is probable that not all amounts due will be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. The collateral value is determined based on appraisals and other market valuations for similar assets. Under FASB ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," the fair value of impaired loans is reported before selling costs of the related collateral, while FASB ASC Topic 310, "Receivables," requires that impaired loans be reported on the balance sheet net of estimated selling costs. Therefore, significant estimated selling costs would result in the reported fair value of impaired loans being greater than the measurement value of impaired loans as maintained on the balance sheet. In most instances, selling costs were estimated for real estate-secured collateral and included broker commissions, legal and title transfer fees and closing costs. Impaired loans are classified as nonrecurring Level 2 assets.

Other Investments: For other investments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Other Real Estate Owned: Real estate that DBI has taken control of in partial or full satisfaction of debt is valued at the lower of book value or fair value. The fair value is determined by analyzing the collateral value of the real estate using appraisals and other market valuations for similar assets less any estimated selling costs. The value carried on the balance sheet for other real estate owned is estimated fair value of the properties. Other real estate owned is classified as a nonrecurring Level 2 asset.

Bank Owned Life Insurance: The carrying amount of bank owned life insurance approximates fair value.

Deposit Liabilities: The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Borrowings: Rates currently available to DSB for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing debt.

Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit and Financial Guarantees Written: The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of guarantees and letters of credit is not material.

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, are summarized in the table below:

	March 31, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$5,494,850	$0	$5,494,850
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	0	40,198,131	0	40,198,131
State and local governments	0	24,995,190	0	24,995,190
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	2,199,340	3,899,844	6,099,184
Total securities available for sale	$0	$72,887,511	$3,899,844	$76,787,355
	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$3,517,050	$0	$3,517,050
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	0	32,226,529	0	32,226,529
State and local governments	0	25,468,499	0	25,468,499
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	2,355,680	4,042,935	6,398,615
Total securities available for sale	$0	$63,567,758	$4,042,935	$67,610,693

The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable (Level 3) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Available-
	for-Sale
	Securities
Beginning balance, January 1, 2012	$4,042,935
Total realized and unrealized gains/(losses):
Included in earnings	(32,875)
Included in other comprehensive income	59,484
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements
Purchases	0
Issuances	0
Sales	0
Settlements	(169,700)
Transfers into Level 3	0
Transfers out of Level 3	0
Ending balance, March 31, 2012	$3,899,844

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, are summarized in the following table:

	March 31, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
Loans held for sale	$0	$434,875	$0	$434,875
Other real estate owned	0	632,355	0	632,355
Impaired loans	0	14,209,623	0	14,209,623
Total Assets	$0	$15,276,853	$0	$15,276,853
	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
Loans held for sale	$0	$485,926	$0	$485,926
Other real estate owned	0	801,689	0	801,689
Impaired loans	0	13,260,619	0	13,260,619
Total Assets	$0	$14,548,234	$0	$14,548,234

The table below summarizes fair value of financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	Carrying	Fair	Carrying	Fair
	Amount	Value	Amount	Value
(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and federal funds sold	$27,464	$27,464	$42,093	$42,093
Investment securities	76,787	76,787	67,611	67,611
Loans, net of allowance for credit losses	295,003	294,483	291,254	291,427
Loans held for sale	435	435	486	486
Bank owned life insurance	7,150	7,150	7,083	7,083
Other investments, at cost	3,107	3,107	4,405	4,405
TOTAL	$409,946	$409,426	$412,932	$413,105
Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$324,922	$325,980	$327,793	$328,864
Borrowings	39,683	41,801	40,041	41,935
TOTAL	$364,605	$367,781	$367,834	$370,799

XML

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity (USD $)	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Member]	Total
Balance, December 31, 2011 at Dec. 31, 2011					$ 56,022,960
Balance, December 31, 2011 (in Shares) at Dec. 31, 2011					118,917
Net income			848,738		848,738
net of reclassification adjustment				79,049,000,000	79,049,000,000
Total comprehensive income					927,787
Treasury stock acquisitions	(146,580)				(146,580)
Treasury stock acquisitions (in Shares)	(349)
Balance, March 31, 2012 at Mar. 31, 2012	$ 15,901,530	$ 469,986	$ 40,767,444	$ (334,793)	$ 56,804,167
Balance, March 31, 2012 (in Shares) at Mar. 31, 2012	118,568				118,568

XML

NOTE 4 - NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Schedule of New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Table Text Block]

NOTE 4 - NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03 Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This update to Topic 860, "Transfers and Servicing," modifies the criteria for determining when repurchase agreements would be accounted for as a secured borrowing rather than a sale. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-03 remove from the assessment of effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. This update does not change the other existing criteria used in the assessment of effective control. ASU No. 2011-03 is effective prospectively for transactions, or modifications of existing transactions, that occur on or after January 1, 2012. These amendments did not have any impact on DBI's financial statements.

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. These amendments to Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement," result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). The changes to U.S. GAAP as a result of ASU No. 2011-04 are as follows; (a) the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets; (b) U.S. GAAP currently prohibits application of a blockage factor in valuing financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets, however ASU No. 2011-04 extends that prohibition to all fair value measurements; (c) an exception is provided to the basic fair value measurement principles for an entity that holds a group of financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk that are managed on the basis of the entity's net exposure to either of those risks which allows the entity, if certain criteria are met, to measure the fair value of the net asset or liability position in a manner consistent with how market participants would price the net risk position; (d) aligns the fair value measurement of instruments classified within an entity's shareholders' equity with the guidance for liabilities; and (e) disclosure requirements have been enhanced for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements to disclose quantitative information about unobservable inputs and assumptions used, to describe the valuation processes used by the entity, and to describe the sensitivity of fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs. In addition, entities must report the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of condition but whose fair value must be disclosed. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 are effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 did not have a material impact on DBI's financial statements.

In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This update to Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income," allows an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The statement(s) are required to be presented with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders' equity but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive must be reclassified to net income. ASU No. 2011-05 is effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 changed the presentation of DBI's income statement and the addition of a statement of other comprehensive income. The adoption did not have any impact on DBI's statement of financial condition.

In September 2011, FASB issues ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This update to Topic 350, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other," permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Previous guidance under Topic 350 required an entity to test goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount (step one). If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the second step of the test must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under the amendments of this update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. If after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. An entity has the option under this update to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-08 had no impact on DBI's financial statements.