N-CSRS 1 lp1-123.htm SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT lp1-123.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number

811-06604

 

 

 

Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc.

 

 

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)

 

 

 

 

 

 

c/o The Dreyfus Corporation

200 Park Avenue

New York, New York  10166

 

 

(Address of principal executive offices)        (Zip code)

 

 

 

 

 

Bennett A. MacDougall, Esq.

200 Park Avenue

New York, New York  10166

 

 

(Name and address of agent for service)

 

 

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 

(212) 922-6400

 

 

Date of fiscal year end:

 

02/28(9)

 

Date of reporting period:

08/31/17

 

 

             

 


 

FORM N-CSR

Item 1.       Reports to Stockholders.

 

 

 


 

Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc.

     

 

SEMIANNUAL REPORT
August 31, 2017

   
 

 

 

Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.

 

The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager(s) only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.

 

Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value

 

Contents

THE FUND

FOR MORE INFORMATION

 

Back Cover

 

       
 


Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc.

 

The Fund

A LETTER FROM THE CEO OF DREYFUS

Dear Shareholder:

We are pleased to present this semiannual report for Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc., covering the six-month period from March 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.

Financial markets generally rallied over the past six months as corporate earnings grew and global economic conditions improved. While the rally was relatively broad-based, U.S. stock market leadership shifted toward larger, growth-oriented companies and away from smaller, economically sensitive companies that had been expected to benefit from a new presidential administration’s stimulative policy proposals. International stocks fared particularly well amid more positive economic data from Europe and the emerging markets. In the bond market, despite short-term interest-rate hikes from the Federal Reserve Board, yields of longer-term U.S. government securities moderated somewhat and prices rose when it became clearer that major tax and fiscal reforms would take time and political capital to enact.

The markets’ strong performance has been supported by solid underlying fundamentals, most notably rising corporate profits, a robust labor market, and muted inflation. While we currently expect these favorable conditions to persist over the second half of the year, we remain watchful for economic and political risks that could derail the rallies. As always, we encourage you to discuss the risks and opportunities of today’s investment environment with your financial advisor.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support.

Sincerely,

Mark D. Santero
Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
September 15, 2017

2

 

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

For the period from March 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017, as provided by Bernard W. Kiernan, Jr., Portfolio Manager

Market and Fund Performance Overview

For the six-month period ended August 31, 2017, Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc. produced an annualized yield of 0.68%. Taking into account the effects of compounding, the fund produced an annualized effective yield of 0.69%.1

Yields of money market instruments climbed modestly over the reporting period as the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) twice raised short-term interest rates and investors looked forward to higher levels of economic growth.

The Fund’s Investment Approach

The fund seeks as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity. To pursue its goal, the fund invests in a diversified portfolio of high-quality, short-term dollar-denominated debt securities, including: securities issued or guaranteed as to principal and interest by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities; certificates of deposit, time deposits, bankers’ acceptances and other short-term securities issued by domestic or foreign banks or thrifts or their subsidiaries or branches; repurchase agreements, including tri-party repurchase agreements; asset-backed securities; domestic and dollar-denominated foreign commercial paper and other short-term corporate obligations, including those with floating or variable rates of interest; and dollar-denominated obligations issued or guaranteed by one or more foreign governments or any of their political subdivisions or agencies. Normally, the fund invests at least 25% of its net assets in domestic or dollar-denominated foreign bank obligations.

When managing the fund, we closely monitor the outlook for economic growth and inflation, follow overseas developments, and consider the posture of the Fed in our decisions as to how to structure the fund. Based upon our economic outlook, we actively manage the fund’s average maturity in looking for opportunities that may present themselves in light of possible changes in interest rates.

Short-Term Interest Rates Moved Higher

The reporting period began in the midst of a robust rally in most domestic financial markets as investors looked forward to more stimulative fiscal, tax, and regulatory policies from a new presidential administration. In addition, the Fed implemented a widely expected short-term rate hike in March 2017, its second in three months. Citing a strong labor market and mounting inflationary pressures, monetary policymakers raised the target for the federal funds rate by 0.25 percentage points to between 0.75% and 1.00%. Although the unemployment rate fell to 4.5%, job creation declined to 50,000 new positions during the month. U.S. economic growth slowed to a 1.2% annualized rate over the first quarter of 2017, reflecting downturns in personal consumption and business inventory investment.

In April 2017, investor confidence moderated amid evidence that enactment of the new presidential administration’s proposed reforms into law was far from certain. U.S. manufacturing activity slowed, but corporate earnings exceeded analysts’ forecasts, and the labor market rebounded with 207,000 new jobs. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate declined to 4.4%.

In May 2017, the unemployment rate slid further to 4.3%, a 16-year low, as older workers retired. A relatively modest 145,000 new jobs were created during the month as some employers reported

3

 

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)

difficulty in finding qualified workers. Nonetheless, wage growth generally remained steady, increasing at a rate that was roughly in line with inflation.

The unemployment rate ticked slightly higher to 4.4% in June 2017. There were 231,000 new jobs added, driven by employment increases in the health care, social assistance, financial, and mining industries. Manufacturing activity continued to expand, with 15 of 18 manufacturing industries reporting growth. The services sector also posted gains during the month. Yet, inflation remained muted as energy prices fell: the Consumer Price Index showed no change compared to the previous month, and prices increased by an average of only 1.6% over the previous 12 months. Yet, the Fed again raised short-term rates by 0.25 percentage points in mid-June 2017, sending the federal funds rate to between 1.00% and 1.25%. The U.S. economy grew at a 3.0% annualized rate during the second quarter of the year.

The Fed held rates steady at its meeting in July 2017. The economy generated 209,000 new jobs during the month, and the unemployment rate moved lower to 4.3%, due mainly to hiring in the food services, professional and business services, and health care industries. Activity in the manufacturing and services sectors continued to grow but at slower rates than in the previous month. In August 2017, an estimated 156,000 jobs were added, and the unemployment rate returned to 4.4%. Import prices and housing starts exceeded forecasts, but retail sales generally disappointed.

Additional Rate Hikes Expected

Despite signs that fiscal and tax reforms may be more difficult to enact than many had anticipated, investors have continued to respond positively to expectations of greater economic growth. Recent comments from members of the Fed’s Board of Governors suggest that the Fed may further moderate its accommodative monetary policy by beginning to unwind its balance sheet through the sale of U.S. government securities. In addition, many analysts expect the Fed to implement another rate increase before year-end.

In the rising-interest-rate environment, we have continued to maintain the fund’s weighted average maturity in a range that is modestly shorter than industry averages. This strategy is intended to capture higher yields as they become available. As always, we have retained our longstanding focus on quality and liquidity.

September 15, 2017

1 Annualized effective yield is based upon dividends declared daily and reinvested monthly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Yields fluctuate. The Dreyfus Corporation has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that total annual fund operating expenses do not exceed 0.45%. The Dreyfus Corporation may terminate the agreement upon at least 90 days’ prior notice to investors, but has committed not to do so until at least July 1, 2018. Had these expenses not been absorbed, fund yields would have been lower, and in some cases, seven-day yields would have been negative.

You could lose money by investing in a money market fund. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it cannot guarantee it will do so. The fund may impose a fee upon the sale of your shares or may temporarily suspend your ability to sell shares if the fund’s liquidity falls below required minimums because of market conditions or other factors. An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. The fund’s sponsor has no legal obligation to provide financial support to the fund, and you should not expect that the sponsor will provide financial support to the fund at any time.

Short-term corporate, asset-backed and municipal securities holdings (as applicable), while rated in the highest rating category by one or more nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) (or unrated, if deemed of comparable quality by the investment adviser), involve credit and liquidity risks and risk of principal loss.

4

 

UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)

As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. If your account balance is less than $50,000, your account may be subject to exchange fees, account closeout fees, and wire and Dreyfus TeleTransfer redemption fees each in the amount of $5.00, as well as a checkwriting fee of $2.00. None of these fees are shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.

Review your fund’s expenses

The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc. from March 1, 2017 to August 31, 2017. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.

           

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment

     

assuming actual returns for the six months ended August 31, 2017

   

 

     

Expenses paid per $1,000

 

$ 2.27

   

Ending value (after expenses)

 

$ 1,003.50

   

COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS
(Unaudited)

Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.

           

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment

     

assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended August 31, 2017

 

 

     

Expenses paid per $1,000

$ 2.29

   

Ending value (after expenses)

$ 1,022.94

   

 Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .45%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

5

 

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
August 31, 2017 (Unaudited)

           

Description

 

Principal
Amount ($)

 

Value ($)

 

Negotiable Bank Certificates of Deposit - 23.6%

     

Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen Girozentrale (Yankee)

         

1.34%, 11/7/17

 

5,000,000

a

5,000,000

 

Norinchukin Bank/NY (Yankee)

         

1.42%, 3/8/18

 

5,000,000

 

5,000,000

 

Societe Generale (Yankee)

         

1.34%, 10/31/17

 

4,000,000

a

4,000,000

 

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp/New York (Yankee)

         

1.42%, 9/18/17

 

5,000,000

a,b

5,000,000

 

Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (Yankee)

         

1.37%, 9/5/17

 

5,000,000

a,b

5,000,000

 

Toronto-Dominion Bank/NY (Yankee)

         

1.41%, 9/15/17

 

5,000,000

a,b

5,000,000

 

Wells Fargo Bank NA (Yankee)

         

1.35%, 9/8/17

 

5,000,000

b

5,002,606

 

Total Negotiable Bank Certificates of Deposit
(cost $34,002,606)

     


34,002,606

 

Commercial Paper - 27.0%

     

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

         

1.35%, 9/18/17

 

5,000,000

a,b

5,005,581

 

Collateralized Commercial Paper II Co LLC

         

1.37%, 9/6/17

 

5,000,000

a,b

5,000,000

 

Danske Corp., Inc.

         

1.32%, 11/10/17

 

5,000,000

a

4,987,215

 

Fairway Finance Corp.

         

1.35%, 9/11/17

 

5,000,000

a,b

4,999,815

 

Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking Corp.

         

1.41%, 1/2/18

 

5,000,000

a

4,976,083

 

NRW Bank

         

1.31%, 12/6/17

 

5,000,000

a

4,982,533

 

Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp./NY

         

1.30%, 9/21/17

 

5,000,000

 

4,996,389

 

Thunder Bay Funding LLC

         

1.35%, 9/18/17

 

4,000,000

a,b

3,999,838

 

Total Commercial Paper
(cost $38,947,454)

     


38,947,454

 

Asset-Backed Commercial Paper - 13.2%

     

Alpine Securitization Ltd.

         

1.31%, 10/31/17

 

5,000,000

a

4,989,084

 

Atlantic Asset Securitization LLC

         

1.41%, 10/10/17

 

4,000,000

 

3,993,933

 

Matchpoint Finance Plc

         

1.49%, 1/5/18

 

5,000,000

a

4,974,100

 

6

 

           

Description

 

Principal
Amount ($)

 

Value ($)

 

Asset-Backed Commercial Paper - 13.2% (continued)

     

Nieuw Amsterdam Receivables Corporation

         

1.28%, 9/11/17

 

5,000,000

a

4,998,222

 

Total Asset-Backed Commercial Paper
(cost $18,955,339)

     


18,955,339

 

Time Deposits - 35.4%

     

Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (Grand Cayman)

         

1.07%, 9/1/17

 

6,000,000

a

6,000,000

 

DNB Bank (Grand Cayman)

         

1.07%, 9/1/17

 

7,000,000

a

7,000,000

 

DZ Bank

         

1.08%, 9/1/17

 

6,000,000

 

6,000,000

 

ING Bank (London)

         

1.20%, 9/1/17

 

6,000,000

 

6,000,000

 

Natixis New York (Grand Cayman)

         

1.07%, 9/1/17

 

7,000,000

 

7,000,000

 

Nordea Bank AB

         

1.07%, 9/1/17

 

6,000,000

a

6,000,000

 

Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken NY (Grand Cayman)

         

1.07%, 9/1/17

 

7,000,000

a

7,000,000

 

Swedbank

         

1.07%, 9/1/17

 

6,000,000

 

6,000,000

 

Total Time Deposits
(cost $51,000,000)

     


51,000,000

 

Total Investments (cost $142,905,399)

 

99.2%

 

142,905,399

 

Cash and Receivables (Net)

 

.8%

 

1,143,265

 

Net Assets

 

100.0%

 

144,048,664

 

 

a Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At August 31, 2017, these securities amounted to $98,912,471 or 68.67% of net assets.

b Variable rate security—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at period end. Date shown represents the earlier of the next interest reset date or ultimate maturity date.

   

Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)

Value (%)

Banking

86.7

Finance

6.9

Asset-Backed/Multi-Seller Programs

5.6

 

99.2

 Based on net assets.

See notes to financial statements.

7

 

STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
August 31, 2017 (Unaudited)

                   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

Value

 

Assets ($):

 

 

 

 

Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments

 

142,905,399

 

142,905,399

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

1,184,170

 

Interest receivable

 

 

 

 

49,912

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

 

 

15,559

 

 

 

 

 

 

144,155,040

 

Liabilities ($):

 

 

 

 

Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 2(b)

 

 

 

 

48,035

 

Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed

 

 

 

 

1,651

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

 

 

56,690

 

 

 

 

 

 

106,376

 

Net Assets ($)

 

 

144,048,664

 

Composition of Net Assets ($):

 

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

 

 

 

 

144,076,101

 

Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments

 

 

 

 

(27,437)

 

Net Assets ($)

 

 

144,048,664

 

Shares Outstanding

 

 

(3 billion shares of $.001 par value Common Stock authorized)

 

144,076,101

 

Net Asset Value Per Share ($)

 

1.00

 

         

See notes to financial statements.

       

 

8

 

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended August 31, 2017 (Unaudited)

             
             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Income ($):

 

 

 

 

Interest Income

 

 

795,419

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

Management fee—Note 2(a)

 

 

351,625

 

Shareholder servicing costs—Note 2(b)

 

 

108,754

 

Professional fees

 

 

45,369

 

Registration fees

 

 

13,810

 

Prospectus and shareholders’ reports

 

 

11,143

 

Custodian fees—Note 2(b)

 

 

8,808

 

Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 2(c)

 

 

5,449

 

Miscellaneous

 

 

10,491

 

Total Expenses

 

 

555,449

 

Less—reduction in expenses due to undertaking—Note 2(a)

 

 

(236,898)

 

Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 2(b)

 

 

(4,382)

 

Net Expenses

 

 

314,169

 

Investment Income—Net

 

 

481,250

 

Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 1(b) ($)

9,850

 

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

 

491,100

 

             

See notes to financial statements.

         

9

 

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

                   
                   

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended
August 31, 2017 (Unaudited)

 

 

 

Year Ended
February 28, 2017

 

Operations ($):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment income—net

 

 

481,250

 

 

 

364,790

 

Net realized gain (loss) on investments

 

9,850

 

 

 

12,336

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Resulting from Operations

491,100

 

 

 

377,126

 

Distributions to Shareholders from ($):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment income—net

 

 

(481,250)

 

 

 

(364,790)

 

Capital Stock Transactions ($1.00 per share):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net proceeds from shares sold

 

 

19,959,672

 

 

 

45,386,417

 

Distributions reinvested

 

 

467,789

 

 

 

350,847

 

Cost of shares redeemed

 

 

(18,046,004)

 

 

 

(92,328,601)

 

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
from Capital Stock Transactions

2,381,457

 

 

 

(46,591,337)

 

Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets

2,391,307

 

 

 

(46,579,001)

 

Net Assets ($):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of Period

 

 

141,657,357

 

 

 

188,236,358

 

End of Period

 

 

144,048,664

 

 

 

141,657,357

 

                   

See notes to financial statements.

               

10

 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions. These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.

               
 

Six Months Ended
August 31, 2017

Year Ended February 28/29,

 

(Unaudited)

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Per Share Data ($):

           

Net asset value,
beginning of period

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Investment Operations:

           

Investment income—net

.003

.002

.000a

.000a

.000a

.000a

Distributions:

           

Dividends from investment
income—net

(.003)

(.002)

(.000)a

(.000)a

(.000)a

(.000)a

Net asset value,
end of period

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Total Return (%)

.35b

.24

.01

.00c

.00c

.00c

Ratios/Supplemental Data (%):

         

Ratio of total expenses
to average net assets

.79d

.77

.77

.72

.71

.68

Ratio of net expenses
to average net assets

.45d

.44

.25

.17

.17

.22

Ratio of net investment income
to average net assets

.68d

.23

.01

.00c

.00c

.00c

Net Assets, end of period
($ x 1,000)

144,049

141,657

188,236

206,455

253,729

303,355

a Amount represents less than $.001 per share.

b Not annualized.

c Amount represents less than .01%.

d Annualized.

See notes to financial statements.

11

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:

Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc. (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a diversified open-end management investment company. The fund’s investment objective is to seek as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.

The fund operates as a “retail money market fund” as that term is defined in Rule 2a-7 under the Act (a “Retail Fund”). It is the fund’s policy to maintain a constant net asset value (“NAV”) per share of $1.00, and the fund has adopted certain investment, portfolio valuation and dividend and distribution policies to enable it to do so. There is no assurance, however, that the fund will be able to maintain a constant NAV per share of $1.00. As a Retail Fund, the fund may, or in certain circumstances, must impose a fee upon the sale of shares or may temporarily suspend redemptions if the fund’s weekly liquid assets fall below required minimums because of market conditions or other factors.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.

(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate market value, the fair value of the portfolio securities will be determined by procedures established by and under the general supervision of the fund’s Board of Directors (the “Board”).

12

 

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, money market securities are valued using amortized cost, in accordance with rules under the Act. Generally, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of August 31, 2017 in valuing the fund’s investments:

   

Valuation Inputs

Short-Term Investments ($)

Level 1 - Unadjusted Quoted Prices

-

Level 2 - Other Significant Observable Inputs

142,905,399

Level 3 - Significant Unobservable Inputs

-

Total

142,905,399

 See Statement of Investments for additional detailed categorizations.

13

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

At August 31, 2017, there were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy.

(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and is recognized on the accrual basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis.

The fund may enter into repurchase agreements with financial institutions, deemed to be creditworthy by Dreyfus, subject to the seller’s agreement to repurchase and the fund’s agreement to resell such securities at a mutually agreed upon price. Pursuant to the terms of the repurchase agreement, such securities must have an aggregate market value greater than or equal to the terms of the repurchase price plus accrued interest at all times. If the value of the underlying securities falls below the value of the repurchase price plus accrued interest, the fund will require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults on its repurchase obligation, the fund maintains its right to sell the underlying securities at market value and may claim any resulting loss against the seller. The collateral is held on behalf of the fund by the tri-party administrator with respect to any tri-party agreement. The fund may also jointly enter into one or more repurchase agreements with other Dreyfus-managed funds in accordance with an exemptive order granted by the SEC pursuant to section 17(d) and Rule 17d-1 under the Act. Any joint repurchase agreements must be collateralized fully by U.S. Government securities.

(c) Dividends and distributions to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains.

(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.

14

 

As of and during the period ended August 31, 2017, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period ended August 31, 2017, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.

Each tax year in the three-year period ended February 28, 2017 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.

Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “2010 Act”), the fund is permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 (“post-enactment losses”) for an unlimited period. Furthermore, post-enactment capital loss carryovers retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than short-term as they were under previous statute. The 2010 Act requires post-enactment losses to be utilized before the utilization of losses incurred in taxable years prior to the effective date of the 2010 Act (“pre-enactment losses”). As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment losses may be more likely to expire unused.

The fund has an unused capital loss carryover of $37,287 available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net realized capital gains, if any, realized subsequent to February 28, 2017. If not applied, the carryover expires in fiscal year 2018.

The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2017 was all ordinary income. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.

At August 31, 2017, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).

NOTE 2—Management Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:

(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with Dreyfus, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .50% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that total annual fund operating expenses do not exceed .45% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets. Dreyfus may terminate this undertaking agreement upon at least 90 days’ prior notice to shareholders, but has committed not to do so until at least July 1, 2018. The reduction in

15

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)

expenses, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $236,898 during the period ended August 31, 2017.

(b) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, the fund reimburses the Distributor at an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets for the provision of certain services. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. During the period ended August 31, 2017, the fund was charged $68,436 pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.

The fund has arrangements with the transfer agent and the custodian whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset transfer agency and custody fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.

The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, under a transfer agency agreement for providing transfer agency and cash management services for the fund. The majority of transfer agency fees are comprised of amounts paid on a per account basis, while cash management fees are related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended August 31, 2017, the fund was charged $35,594 for transfer agency services and $1,698 for cash management services. These fees are included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations. Cash management fees were offset by earnings credits of $1,698.

The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. These fees are determined based on net assets, geographic region and transaction activity. During the period ended August 31, 2017, the fund was charged $8,808 pursuant to the custody agreement. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $2,684.

The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a shareholder redemption draft processing agreement for providing certain services related to the fund’s check writing privilege. During the period ended August 31, 2017, the fund was charged $1,157 pursuant to the agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.

16

 

During the period ended August 31, 2017, the fund was charged $5,604 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer and his staff.

The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $60,326, Shareholder Services Plan fees $11,000, custodian fees $11,551, Chief Compliance Officer fees $4,670 and transfer agency fees $15,299, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $54,811.

(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.

17

 

INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)

At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Directors held on July 20, 2017, the Board considered the renewal of the fund’s Management Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides the fund with investment advisory and administrative services (the “Agreement”). The Board members, none of whom are “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from Dreyfus representatives. In considering the renewal of the Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below. The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.

Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund. The Board considered information provided to them at the meeting and in previous presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the fund, the fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex (such as retail direct or intermediary, in which intermediaries typically are paid by the fund and/or Dreyfus) and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each intermediary or distribution channel, as applicable to the fund.

The Board also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructures.

Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio. The Board reviewed reports prepared by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended May 31, 2017, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Broadridge as of the date of its analysis. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Broadridge used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.

18

 

Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds. The Board discussed with representatives of Dreyfus and/or its affiliates the results of the comparisons and considered that the fund’s total return performance was above the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians for all periods.

The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board considered that the fund’s contractual management fee was above the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expense ratio was above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians. The Board also considered the current fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangement undertaken by Dreyfus.

Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund (the “Similar Funds”), and explained the nature of the Similar Funds. They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors. The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Funds to evaluate the appropriateness of the fund’s management fee.

Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and its affiliates and the resulting profitability percentage for managing the fund and the aggregate profitability percentage to Dreyfus and its affiliates for managing the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit. The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable given the services rendered and service levels provided by Dreyfus. The Board also considered the fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangement and its effect on the profitability of Dreyfus and its affiliates. The Board also had been provided with information prepared by an independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex. The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.

The Board considered, on the advice of its counsel, the profitability analysis (1) as part of its evaluation of whether the fees under the Agreement, considered in relation to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, supported the renewal of the Agreement and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for the fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives stated that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. Dreyfus

19

 

INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)

representatives also stated that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and took into consideration that there were no soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading the fund’s investments.

At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of the Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board concluded and determined as follows.

· The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.

· The Board was satisfied with the fund’s relative performance.

· The Board concluded that the fee paid to Dreyfus continued to be appropriate under the circumstances and in light of the factors and the totality of the services provided as discussed above.

· The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreement and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.

In evaluating the Agreement, the Board considered these conclusions and determinations and also relied on its previous knowledge, gained through meetings and other interactions with Dreyfus and its affiliates, of Dreyfus and the services provided to the fund by Dreyfus. The Board also relied on information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year relating to the operations of the fund and the investment management and other services provided under the Agreement, including information on the investment performance of the fund in comparison to similar mutual funds and benchmark performance measures; general market outlook as applicable to the fund; and compliance reports. In addition, the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for this fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of the Agreement for the fund, or substantially similar agreements for other Dreyfus funds that the Board oversees, during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board’s conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the fund’s arrangements, or similar arrangements for other Dreyfus funds that the Board oversees, in prior years. The Board determined to renew the Agreement.

20

 

NOTES

21

 

For More Information

Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc.

200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166

Manager

The Dreyfus Corporation
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166

Custodian

The Bank of New York Mellon
225 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10286

Transfer Agent &
Dividend Disbursing Agent

Dreyfus Transfer, Inc.
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166

Distributor

MBSC Securities Corporation
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166

   

Ticker Symbol:

DBAXX

Telephone Call your financial representative or 1-800-DREYFUS

Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 1556-0144

E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com

Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at www.dreyfus.com

The fund will disclose daily, on www.dreyfus.com, the fund’s complete schedule of holdings as of the end of the previous business day. The schedule of holdings will remain on the website until the fund files its Form N-Q or Form N-CSR for the period that includes the date of the posted holdings.

The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (phone 1-800-SEC-0330 for information).

Information regarding how the fund voted proxies related to portfolio securities for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available at www.dreyfus.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-DREYFUS.

   

© 2017 MBSC Securities Corporation
0123SA0817

 


 

Item 2.       Code of Ethics.

                  Not applicable.

Item 3.       Audit Committee Financial Expert.

                  Not applicable.

Item 4.       Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

                  Not applicable.

Item 5.       Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

                  Not applicable.

Item 6.       Investments.

(a)              Not applicable.

Item 7.       Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

                  Not applicable.

Item 8.       Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9.       Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers.

                  Not applicable.

Item 10.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

                  There have been no material changes to the procedures applicable to Item 10.

Item 11.     Controls and Procedures.

(a)        The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)        There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 


 

Item 12.     Exhibits.

(a)(1)   Not applicable.

(a)(2)   Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

(a)(3)   Not applicable.

(b)        Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 

 


 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dreyfus BASIC Money Market Fund, Inc.

By:       /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak

            Bradley J. Skapyak

            President

 

Date:    October 27, 2017

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:       /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak

            Bradley J. Skapyak

            President

 

Date:    October 27, 2017

 

 

By:       /s/ James Windels

            James Windels

            Treasurer

 

Date:    October 27, 2017

 

 


 

EXHIBIT INDEX

(a)(2)   Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.  (EX-99.CERT)

(b)        Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.  (EX-99.906CERT)