10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to           

Commission File Number: 1-11884

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Republic of Liberia	98-0081645
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, Florida 33132

(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

(305) 539-6000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No ý

There were 219,995,391 shares of common stock outstanding as of October 16, 2015.

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements	1
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	41
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	42
Item 1A. Risk Factors	42
Item 6. Exhibits	43
SIGNATURES	44

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)

	Quarter Ended September 30,
	2015			2014
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,873,942		$	1,786,746
Onboard and other revenues	649,158			602,016
Total revenues	2,523,100			2,388,762
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	413,156			396,916
Onboard and other	175,214			182,658
Payroll and related	217,627			214,260
Food	122,124			120,908
Fuel	199,848			230,818
Other operating	259,057			281,322
Total cruise operating expenses	1,387,026			1,426,882
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	256,060			239,662
Depreciation and amortization expenses	210,742			192,448
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267			—
Restructuring charges	—			308
Operating Income	258,005			529,462
Other income (expense):
Interest income	1,735			2,117
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(66,819		)	(60,100		)
Other income (including in 2015 a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment)	35,866			18,769
	(29,218		)	(39,214		)
Net Income	$	228,787		$	490,248
Earnings per Share:
Basic	$	1.04		$	2.20
Diluted	$	1.03		$	2.19
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	219,963			222,523
Diluted	221,137			223,859
Comprehensive Income
Net Income	$	228,787		$	490,248
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(4,191		)	(18,482		)
Change in defined benefit plans	3,318			(1,451		)
Loss on cash flow derivative hedges	(222,492		)	(249,626		)
Total other comprehensive loss	(223,365		)	(269,559		)
Comprehensive Income	$	5,422		$	220,689

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited; in thousands, except per share data)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014
Passenger ticket revenues	$	4,688,189		$	4,590,048
Onboard and other revenues	1,708,832			1,665,981
Total revenues	6,397,021			6,256,029
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	1,093,409			1,068,961
Onboard and other	438,558			456,296
Payroll and related	647,788			634,232
Food	361,317			358,172
Fuel	607,689			718,081
Other operating	777,291			825,794
Total cruise operating expenses	3,926,052			4,061,536
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	817,040			790,957
Depreciation and amortization expenses	617,678			579,063
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267			—
Restructuring charges	—			1,958
Operating Income	624,984			822,515
Other income (expense):
Interest income	8,244			8,023
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(213,598		)	(193,931		)
Other income (including in 2015 a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment)	39,354			17,771
	(166,000		)	(168,137		)
Net Income	$	458,984		$	654,378
Earnings per Share:
Basic	$	2.09		$	2.95
Diluted	$	2.08		$	2.93
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	219,835			222,007
Diluted	220,979			223,351
Comprehensive Income
Net Income	$	458,984		$	654,378
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(23,994		)	(17,845		)
Change in defined benefit plans	5,567			(5,536		)
Loss on cash flow derivative hedges	(280,968		)	(323,179		)
Total other comprehensive loss	(299,395		)	(346,560		)
Comprehensive Income	$	159,589		$	307,818

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

	As of
	September 30,			December 31,
	2015			2014
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	147,419		$	189,241
Trade and other receivables, net	241,638			261,392
Inventories	131,108			123,490
Prepaid expenses and other assets	269,914			226,960
Derivative financial instruments	110,747			—
Total current assets	900,826			801,083
Property and equipment, net	18,776,782			18,193,627
Goodwill	286,707			420,542
Other assets	994,533			1,297,938
	$	20,958,848		$	20,713,190
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	905,128		$	799,630
Accounts payable	305,747			331,505
Accrued interest	83,281			49,074
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	630,455			635,138
Derivative financial instruments	549,524			266,986
Customer deposits	1,886,356			1,766,914
Total current liabilities	4,360,491			3,849,247
Long-term debt	7,584,808			7,644,318
Other long-term liabilities	757,763			935,266
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding)	—			—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 233,796,056 and 233,106,019 shares issued, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)	2,338			2,331
Paid-in capital	3,279,806			3,253,552
Retained earnings	6,819,809			6,575,248
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,196,389		)	(896,994		)
Treasury stock (13,808,683 common shares at cost, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014)	(649,778		)	(649,778		)
Total shareholders’ equity	8,255,786			8,284,359
	$	20,958,848		$	20,713,190

.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, in thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014
Operating Activities
Net income	$	458,984		$	654,378
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization	617,678			579,063
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267			—
Net deferred income tax (benefit) expense	(13,466		)	1,177
Loss on derivative instruments not designated as hedges	49,607			24,234
Loss on sale of property and equipment	—			17,401
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in trade and other receivables, net	24,130			69,833
(Increase) decrease in inventories	(8,377		)	13,900
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets	(30,649		)	(3,596		)
Decrease in accounts payable	(22,915		)	(33,668		)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest	34,207			(36,693		)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities	11,558			48,600
Increase in customer deposits	65,511			104,211
Other, net	10,401			20,724
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,607,936			1,459,564
Investing Activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(1,360,637		)	(559,018		)
Cash paid on settlement of derivative financial instruments	(158,890		)	(14,808		)
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates	(54,250		)	(69,748		)
Cash received on loans to unconsolidated affiliates	122,710			76,167
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	—			220,000
Other, net	(18,642		)	2,592
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,469,709		)	(344,815		)
Financing Activities
Debt proceeds	2,962,501			1,917,550
Debt issuance costs	(57,146		)	(49,641		)
Repayments of debt	(2,887,237		)	(2,958,427		)
Dividends paid	(197,718		)	(131,857		)
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options	6,902			65,885
Cash received on settlement of derivative financial instruments	—			22,835
Other, net	1,778			1,422
Net cash used in financing activities	(170,920		)	(1,132,233		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(9,129		)	(4,022		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(41,822		)	(21,506		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	189,241			204,687
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	147,419		$	183,181
Supplemental Disclosure
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amount capitalized	$	151,661		$	208,311

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,the terms “Royal Caribbean,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. and, depending on the context, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.’s consolidated subsidiaries and/or affiliates. The terms “Royal Caribbean International,” “Celebrity Cruises,” “Pullmantur,” “Azamara Club Cruises,” “CDF Croisières de France” and “TUI Cruises” refer to our cruise brands. However, because TUI Cruises is an unconsolidated investment, our operating results and other disclosures herein do not include TUI Cruises unless otherwise specified.  In accordance with cruise vacation industry practice, the term “berths” is determined based on double occupancy per cabin even though many cabins can accommodate three or more passengers. This report should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, including the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included therein.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also includes trademarks, trade names and service marks of other companies.  Use or display by us of other parties’ trademarks, trade names or service marks is not intended to and does not imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, these other parties other than as described herein.

Note 1. General

Description of Business

We are a global cruise company.  We own Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises, Pullmantur, Azamara Club Cruises, CDF Croisières de France and a 50% joint venture interest in TUI Cruises.

Basis for Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Estimates are required for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with these principles. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. We consolidate entities over which we have control, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest of greater than 50%, and variable interest entities where we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Refer to Note 5. Other Assets for further information regarding our variable interest entities. For affiliates we do not control but over which we have significant influence on financial and operating policies, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest from 20% to 50%, the investment is accounted for using the equity method. We consolidate the operating results of Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France on a two-month lag to allow for more timely preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Except for the impairment of Pullmantur related assets, as described in Note 3. Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets, no material events or transactions affecting Pullmantur or CDF Croisières de France have occurred during the two-month lag period of August and September 2015 that would require further disclosure or adjustment to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

We believe the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. Our revenues are seasonal and results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year. 

5

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenues and Expenses

We recognize passenger ticket revenues, revenues from onboard and other goods and services and all associated cruise operating costs for all of our uncompleted voyages on a pro-rata basis. Prior to September 30, 2014, we recognized revenues and cruise operating costs for our shorter voyages (voyages of ten days or less) upon voyage completion while we recognized revenues and cruise operating costs for voyages in excess of ten days on a pro-rata basis.

The change to prorate all voyages as of September 30, 2014 forward was not retrospectively applied to prior periods, as the impact of prorating all voyages was immaterial to the respective periods presented.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the principles used to recognize revenue for all entities. The guidance is based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not comprehensively addressed in the prior accounting guidance. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods. In August 2015, the effective date of this guidance was deferred by one year and will now be effective for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of this newly issued guidance to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, GAAP guidance was issued requiring management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and provide related disclosures. This guidance will be effective for our annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2016 and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued changing the requirements for reporting extraordinary and unusual items in the income statement. The update eliminates the concept of extraordinary items. The presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued affecting current consolidation guidance. The guidance changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods and will be effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs. The guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by these amendments. Additionally, in August 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the presentation of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. The amendments continue to allow an entity to present debt issuance costs as an asset with subsequent amortization over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. This guidance should be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements, with the exception of reclassifying debt issuance costs from Other assets to be reflected as a reduction of our current and long-term liabilities.

6

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to provide a practical expedient for the measurement date of an employer's defined benefit obligation and plan assets. The guidance provides a practical expedient for entities with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end and for contributions or significant events that occur between the month-end date and an entity's fiscal year end. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify a customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The amendments provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license or if the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. This guidance will impact the accounting of software licenses but will not change a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The guidance will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments either prospectively or retrospectively. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the measurement of inventory for all entities. The amendments apply to all inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out or average cost. The guidance requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The guidance must be applied prospectively and will be effective for our interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the accounting for measurement-period adjustments related to business combinations. The amendments require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined and eliminates the requirement to retroactively adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Other

Revenues and expenses include port costs that vary with guest head counts. The amounts of such port costs included in Passenger ticket revenues on a gross basis were $156.8 million and $155.0 million for the third quarters of 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $425.6 million and $416.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Reclassifications

On January 1, 2015, we adopted ASC 853, Service Concession Arrangements ("ASC 853"), using the modified retrospective approach. Due to the adoption of ASC 853, $41.9 million has been reclassified in the consolidated balance sheet, as of December 31, 2014, from Property and equipment, net to Other assets in order to conform to the current year presentation. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended September 30,2014, $1.2 million has been reclassified in the consolidated statements of cash flows from Other, net to Net deferred income tax (benefit) expense within Net cash provided by operating activities in order to conform to the current year presentation.

Note 3. Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets

Pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the Spanish and Latin American markets. These markets have experienced significant volatility and the brand has adopted various changes to its operating strategy as a result. Most recently, in response to favorable economic expectations in Latin America, especially Brazil, management undertook a positioning of the brand to increase sourcing of guests and to deliver deployment for Latin American consumers; transferring newer and more efficient capacity to the brand; and selling Pullmantur’s non-cruise businesses to allow the brand to focus on the core cruise business.

7

However, the Latin American resurgence was short lived and the core Latin American economies, including Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Venezuela, have regressed and their currencies have materially depreciated versus the US dollar.  During the second quarter of 2015, as a result of the weakness in Latin America, we decided to defer the scheduled transfer of Royal Caribbean International’s Majesty of the Seas to the Pullmantur fleet. During our most recently completed quarter, the negative economic trends significantly deteriorated. Most notably, the Brazilian Real devalued by approximately 22% relative to the US dollar during the third quarter of 2015.

In light of the increased challenges facing Pullmantur’s Latin American strategy, we recently made a decision to significantly change that strategy from growing the brand through vessel transfers to a right-sizing strategy. This right-sizing strategy includes reducing our exposure to Latin America, refocusing on the brand’s core market of Spain and, consequently, reducing the size of Pullmantur’s fleet. This strategic change includes a decision to redeploy Pullmantur’s Empress to the Royal Caribbean International brand as well as a decision to cancel the intended transfer of the Majesty of the Seas to Pullmantur. As we previously disclosed, the planned growth of the Pullmantur fleet through the transfer of vessels into the brand has been the most significant assumption within Pullmantur's projected cash flows supporting the recoverability of the Pullmantur reporting unit’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names. Our decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur’s fleet significantly decreases the cash flow projections which have been the basis of our impairment analysis.

As a result of these developments, we performed an interim impairment evaluation of Pullmantur’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The estimation of future cash flows requires our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues, operating costs, marketing, selling and administrative expenses, interest rates, ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry’s competitive environment and general and economic business conditions, among other factors.

Due to the previously described market conditions and our recent decision to reduce our exposure to Latin America, refocus on the brand’s core Spanish market and reduce the brand's overall capacity, we reviewed the two-step goodwill impairment test based on the updated cash flow projections. As a result of this analysis, we determined that the carrying value of the Pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its fair value. Similarly, we determined that the carrying value of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names exceeded their fair value as well. Accordingly, upon the completion of the two-step impairment test, we recognized an impairment charge of $123.8 million and $174.3 million for goodwill and trademark and trade names, respectively, during the quarter ended September 30, 2015. These charges reflect the full carrying amounts of the goodwill and trademark and trade names leaving Pullmantur with no intangible assets on its books.

Additionally, in conjunction with performing the two-step goodwill impairment test, we identified that the estimated fair value of certain long-lived assets, consisting of two ships and three aircraft were less than their carrying values. As a result of this determination, we evaluated these assets pursuant to our long-lived asset impairment test. The decision to significantly reduce our exposure to the Latin American market negatively impacted the expected undiscounted cash flows of these vessels and aircraft and resulted in an impairment charge of $113.2 million to write down these assets to their estimated fair values during the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The remaining assets for the Pullmantur reporting unit have fair values greater than or equal to their carrying amounts.

The carrying amounts of goodwill and intangible assets attributable to our Pullmantur reporting unit were as follows (in thousands):

	Goodwill			Intangibles
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	133,583		$	188,037
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	(123,814		)	(174,285		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(9,769		)	(13,752		)
Balance at September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—

Intangible assets are reported within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.

Pullmantur had recognized a deferred tax liability of $43.4 million, which represented the tax effect of the basis difference between the tax and book values of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names. In addition, Pullmantur had recognized a net deferred tax asset relating to net operating losses with an unlimited carryforward period. The benefit of the deferred tax asset was previously assumed through the future realization of the deferred tax liability. A partial valuation allowance was previously established against the deferred tax asset since the utilization of the net operating losses is subject to a 70% annual limitation. As a result of the

8

impairment of the trademarks and trade names, we reversed the deferred tax liability of $43.4 million and increased the valuation allowance by $31.4 million, or to 100% of the deferred tax asset balance, resulting in a $12.0 million deferred tax benefit recognized during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

The combined impairment charge of $411.3 million related to Pullmantur’s goodwill, trademarks and trade names, vessels and aircraft was reported within Impairment of Pullmantur related assets and the net $12.0 million deferred tax benefit was reported within Other income (expense) in our statement of comprehensive income (loss), resulting in a net impairment loss of $399.3 million.

Note 4. Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Net income for basic and diluted earnings per share	$	228,787	$	490,248	$	458,984	$	654,378
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	219,963		222,523		219,835		222,007
Dilutive effect of stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock awards	1,174		1,336		1,144		1,344
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding	221,137		223,859		220,979		223,351
Basic earnings per share	$	1.04	$	2.20	$	2.09	$	2.95
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.03	$	2.19	$	2.08	$	2.93

There were no antidilutive shares for thequarters and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015and September 30, 2014, respectively.

Note 5. Other Assets

A Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) is an entity in which the equity investors have not provided enough equity to finance the entity’s activities or the equity investors: (1) cannot directly or indirectly make decisions about the entity’s activities through their voting rights or similar rights; (2) do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity; (3) do not have the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (4) have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the entity’s activities involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.

We have determined that TUI Cruises GmbH, our 50%-owned joint venture, which operates the brand TUI Cruises, is a VIE. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our investment, including equity and loans, in TUI Cruises was approximately $338.4 million and $370.1 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, this amount was included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we and TUI AG, our joint venture partner, have each guaranteed the repayment of 50% of a bank loan originally borrowed by TUI Cruises in 2011 and refinanced in May 2015. In connection with the refinancing, the principal amount of the loan was increased by €40.0 million. As of September 30, 2015, the outstanding principal amount of the loan was €142.7 million, or approximately $159.3 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015. In addition the maturity date was extended from May 2016 to May 2022. Notwithstanding this, the lenders have agreed to release each shareholder's guarantee in 2018. The loan continues to amortize quarterly and to be secured by first mortgages on the Mein Schiff 1 and Mein Schiff 2 vessels. Based on current facts and circumstances, we do not believe potential obligations under our guarantee of this bank loan are probable.

The €40.0 million of additional proceeds received by TUI Cruises in connection with the refinancing of the bank loan discussed above were used during the second quarter of 2015 to repay in full the outstanding balance of the debt facility we originally provided to TUI Cruises in 2011 in connection with our sale of Celebrity Mercury.

Our investment amount and the potential obligations under this guarantee are substantially our maximum exposure to loss. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of TUI Cruises. We believe that the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact TUI Cruises’ economic performance are shared between ourselves and TUI AG. All the significant operating and financial decisions of TUI Cruises require the consent of both parties, which we believe creates shared power over TUI Cruises. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and account for this investment under the equity method of accounting.

9

As of September 30, 2015, TUI Cruises has four newbuild ships on order with Meyer Turku scheduled to be delivered in each of 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. TUI Cruises has in place commitments for the financing of up to 80% of the contract price of each ship on order. The remaining portion of the contract price of the ships will be funded with a €150.0 million bank facility and TUI Cruises’ cash flows from operations. The various ship construction and credit agreements include certain restrictions on each of our and TUI AG’s ability to reduce our current ownership interest in TUI Cruises below 37.55% through 2021.

In March 2015, we announced the pending sale of Splendour of the Seas to TUI Cruises. The sale for €188.0 million is scheduled to be completed in April 2016 in order to retain the future revenues to be generated for sailings through that date. After the sale, TUI Cruises will lease the ship to Thomson Cruises, which will operate the ship. The purchase price will be financed by us under a secured credit agreement to be repaid over 10 years. The resulting term loan will be 50% guaranteed by TUI AG and will be secured by a first mortgage on the ship. Interest will accrue at the rate of 6.25% per annum. We executed certain forward contracts to lock in the sales price of the ship at approximately $213 million. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our consolidated financial statements.

We have determined that Grand Bahama Shipyard Ltd. (“Grand Bahama”), a ship repair and maintenance facility in which we have a 40% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE. The facility serves cruise and cargo ships, oil and gas tankers and offshore units.  We utilize this facility, among other ship repair facilities, for our regularly scheduled drydocks and certain emergency repairs as may be required. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of this facility as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the facility’s economic performance. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, 2015, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately $52.7 million, consisting of $12.5 million in equity and $40.2 million in loans. As of December 31, 2014, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately $53.8 million, consisting of $7.7 million in equity and $46.1 million in loans. These amounts represent our maximum exposure to loss. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, we received approximately $3.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in principal and interest payments related to a loan that is in accrual status from Grand Bahama, which was paid in full during the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The remaining amount of our loan to Grand Bahama is in non-accrual status and is included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets for which we received payments of approximately $2.8 million during the quarter ended September 30 , 2015. We monitor credit risk associated with this loan through our participation on Grand Bahama’s board of directors along with our review of Grand Bahama’s financial statements and projected cash flows. Based on this review, we believe the risk of loss associated with the outstanding loan is not probable as of September 30, 2015.

We have determined that Skysea Holding, in which we have a 35% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE for which we are not the primary beneficiary, as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. In addition, we and Ctrip.com International Ltd, which also owns 35% of Skysea Holding, each provided a debt facility to a wholly owned subsidiary of Skysea Holding in the amount of $80.0 million. Interest under these facilities, which mature in January 2030, initially accrues at a rate of 3.0% per annum with an increase of at least 0.5% every two years through maturity. The facilities, which are pari passu to each other, are each 100% guaranteed by Skysea Holding and are secured by a first priority mortgage on the ship, Golden Era, formerly known as Celebrity Century, which we sold to a wholly owned subsidiary of Skysea Holding in September 2014. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our investment in Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries, including equity and loans, was approximately $101.6 million and $106.3 million, respectively. This amount was included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. Our investment amount is substantially our maximum exposure to loss. During the quarter ended June 30, 2015, Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries commenced operations through the brand SkySea Cruises.

Our share of income from investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, including the entities discussed above, was $38.4 million and $25.7 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, and $62.2 million and $34.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, and was recorded within Other income.

Note 6. Long-Term Debt

In April 2015, we took delivery of Anthem of the Seas. To finance the purchase, we borrowed $742.1 million under a previously committed unsecured term loan which is 95% guaranteed by Euler Hermes Deutschland AG ("Hermes"), the official export credit agency of Germany. The loan amortizes semi-annually over 12 years and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 1.30%, totaling 1.71% as of September 30, 2015. Refer to Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for information regarding interest rate swap agreements related to this loan.

10

In June 2015, we amended and restated our $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due July 2016. The amendment reduced the applicable margin and facility fee and extended the termination date to June 2020. The applicable margin and facility fee vary with our debt rating and were 1.50% and 0.25%, respectively, as of September 30, 2015. We have the right to request an increase in the capacity of the amended facility by an additional $300 million, subject to the receipt of additional or increased lender commitments, and to extend the termination date by up to two years, subject to lender consent. Additionally, in July 2015, we amended our $1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due August 2018 to reduce pricing in line with the amended pricing of the $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility. These amendments did not result in the extinguishment of debt.

In July 2015, we also amended our $380.0 million, €365.0 million, $290.0 million and $65.0 million unsecured term loans due at various dates from 2016 through 2019 to reduce the applicable margins. The margins are currently 1.75% for each loan based on our debt rating as of September 30, 2015. The termination date of the $290 million unsecured term loan was extended from February 2016 to February 2018. None of these amendments resulted in the extinguishment of debt.

In October 2015, we received increased lender commitments for our unsecured revolving credit facility due June 2020 in the amount of $300 million, bringing our total capacity under this facility to $1.4 billion.

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

In January 2015, we entered into a financing arrangement for the US dollar financing of the fourth Oasis-class ship. Through the financing arrangement, we have the right, but not the obligation, to satisfy the obligations to be incurred upon delivery and acceptance of the vessel under the shipbuilding contract by assuming, at delivery and acceptance, the debt indirectly incurred by the shipbuilder during the construction of the ship. The amount assumed under this arrangement is not to exceed the US dollar equivalent of €931.2 million, or approximately $1.0 billion, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015. The loan, if we were to elect assumption at the date of actual delivery, will amortize semi-annually and will mature 12 years following delivery of the ship. At our election, interest on the loan will accrue either (1) at a fixed rate of 3.82% (inclusive of the applicable margin) or (2) at a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.10%.

In June 2015, we entered into an agreement with Meyer Werft to build the fourth Quantum-class ship for Royal Caribbean International. We have also received a commitment for the unsecured financing of up to 80% of the ship’s contract price. Hermes has agreed to guarantee to the lenders payment of 95% of the financing. The ship will have a capacity of approximately 4,150 berths and is expected to enter service in the second quarter of 2019.

In October 2015, our conditional agreements with STX France to build two ships of a new generation of Celebrity Cruises ships, known as "Project Edge" became effective. We received commitments for the unsecured financing of the ships for up to 80% of the ship’s contract price through a facility to be guaranteed 100% by COFACE. The ships will each have a capacity of approximately 2,900 berths and are expected to enter service in the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first half of 2020, respectively.

As of September 30, 2015, the aggregate cost of our ships on order, not including the "Project Edge" ships and the TUI Cruises' ships on order, was approximately $5.0 billion, of which we had deposited $449.8 million as of such date. Approximately 43.7% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2015. Refer to Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for further information.

Litigation

As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, a class action complaint was filed in June 2011 against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants employed onboard Royal Caribbean International cruise vessels. The complaint alleged that the stateroom attendants were required to pay other crew members to help with their duties and that certain stateroom attendants were required to work back of house assignments without the ability to earn gratuities, in each case in violation of the U.S. Seaman’s Wage Act. In May 2012, the district court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis that the applicable collective bargaining agreement requires any such claims to be arbitrated. The United States Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, affirmed the district court’s dismissal and denied the plaintiffs’ petition for re-hearing and re-hearing en banc. In October 2014, the United States Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ request to review the order compelling arbitration. Subsequently, approximately 575 crew members submitted demands for arbitration. The demands make substantially the same allegations as in the federal court complaint and are similarly seeking damages, wage penalties and interest in an indeterminate amount. Unlike the federal court complaint, the demands for arbitration are being brought individually by each of the crew members and not on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants. At this time, we are unable to estimate the possible impact of this matter on us. However, we believe the underlying claims made against us are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them.

11

In April 2015, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation issued Notices of Violation to Royal Caribbean International and Celebrity Cruises seeking monetary penalties for alleged violations of the Alaska Marine Visible Emission Standards that occurred over the past five years on certain of our vessels. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the allegations and we are cooperating with the state of Alaska. We do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

We are routinely involved in other claims typical within the cruise vacation industry. The majority of these claims are covered by insurance. We believe the outcome of such claims, net of expected insurance recoveries, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

Other

If (i) any person other than A. Wilhelmsen AS. and Cruise Associates and their respective affiliates (the “Applicable Group”) acquires ownership of more than 33% of our common stock and the Applicable Group owns less of our common stock than such person, or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, during any 24-month period, a majority of the Board is no longer comprised of individuals who were members of the Board on the first day of such period, we may be obligated to prepay indebtedness outstanding under our ship financing facilities, which we may be unable to replace on similar terms. Our other debt agreements also contain change of control provisions that would be triggered by the acquisition of greater than 50% of our common stock by (i) any person or (ii) in the case of our public debt securities, by a person other than a member of the Applicable Group coupled with a ratings downgrade. If this were to occur, it would have an adverse impact on our liquidity and operations.

Note 8. Shareholders’ Equity

In September 2015, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.375 per share which was paid in the fourth quarter of 2015. During the first and second quarters of 2015, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share. During the first quarter of 2015, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2014.

During the third quarter of 2014, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share which was paid in the fourth quarter of 2014. During the first and second quarters of 2014, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.25 per share. During the first quarter of 2014, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.25 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2013.

In October 2015, our board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program for up to $500 million. The timing and number of shares purchased will depend on a variety of factors including price and market conditions.  Repurchases under the program are expected to be funded from available cash or borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. On October 23, 2015, we executed an agreement with an investment bank to purchase a total of $200 million, of the $500 million authorized amount, of our common stock under an accelerated stock repurchase (ASR) transaction. Under the terms of the ASR agreement, we will receive upfront the majority of the shares of our common stock to be repurchased based on current market prices in exchange for a prepayment of $200 million. The final number of shares to be repurchased will be determined upon settlement based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock during the term of the transaction, less a discount (the "Final Repurchase Price"). Upon final settlement, which is expected no later than the end of January 2016, and depending on the Final Repurchase Price, the investment bank may be required to deliver additional shares of common stock to us or we may be required to deliver shares of common stock or to make a cash payment, at our election, to the investment bank. The initial shares received upon prepayment and incremental shares received at maturity, if any, will be recorded in Shareholders’ equity upon delivery, based on the current market price of our common stock. Future stock repurchase transactions could include open market purchases or additional accelerated share repurchases. We expect to complete the program by the end of 2016.

Note 9. Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
	Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income at beginning of the year	$	(826,026	)	$	(31,207	)	$	(39,761	)	$	(896,994	)	$	43,324		$	(23,994	)	$	(13,659	)	$	5,671
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	(483,946		)	4,213			(23,994		)	(503,727		)	(339,415		)	(6,829		)	(19,842		)	(366,086		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	202,978			1,354			—			204,332			16,236			1,293			1,997			19,526
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income	(280,968		)	5,567			(23,994		)	(299,395		)	(323,179		)	(5,536		)	(17,845		)	(346,560		)
Ending balance	$	(1,106,994	)	$	(25,640	)	$	(63,755	)	$	(1,196,389	)	$	(279,855	)	$	(29,530	)	$	(31,504	)	$	(340,889	)

The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive  Income (Loss) into Income
Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014			Affected Line Item in  Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges:
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(261	)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Interest rate swaps	(10,276		)	(3,106		)	(27,024		)	(9,312		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Foreign currency forward contracts	(752		)	(450		)	(2,153		)	(1,348		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses
Foreign currency forward contracts	(239		)	(238		)	(715		)	(4,052		)	Other income
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			(57		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Foreign currency collar options	(568		)	—			(1,003		)	—			Depreciation and amortization expenses
Fuel swaps	(65,975		)	(1,996		)	(172,083		)	(1,206		)	Fuel
	(77,810		)	(5,790		)	(202,978		)	(16,236		)
Amortization of defined benefit plans:
Actuarial loss	(354		)	(222		)	(1,061		)	(666		)	Payroll and related
Prior service costs	—			(209		)	(293		)	(627		)	Payroll and related
	(354		)	(431		)	(1,354		)	(1,293		)
Release of foreign cumulative translation due to sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses:
Foreign cumulative translation	—			—			—			(1,997		)	Other operating
Total reclassifications for the period	$	(78,164	)	$	(6,221	)	$	(204,332	)	$	(19,526	)

12

Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using										Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents(4)	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	—	$	—	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—
Total Assets	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	—	$	—	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)(5)	$	8,438,804	$	8,732,461	$	1,556,756	$	7,175,705	$	—	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	8,438,804	$	8,732,461	$	1,556,756	$	7,175,705	$	—	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—

(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company.

(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(4) Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.

(5) Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations.

Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses approximate fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using
Description	Total		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)		Total		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments(4)	$	113,279	$	—	$	113,279	$	—	$	63,981	$	—	$	63,981	$	—
Investments(5)	$	3,884	3,884		—		—		$	5,531	5,531		—		—
Total Assets	$	117,163	$	3,884	$	113,279	$	—	$	69,512	$	5,531	$	63,981	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments(6)	$	925,202	$	—	$	925,202	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	925,202	$	—	$	925,202	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—

13

(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity, as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options’ contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.

(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(4) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

(5) Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds.

(6) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency collar options, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

The reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014, or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement.

The following table presents information about the Company’s goodwill, indefinite-life intangible assets and long-lived assets for our Pullmantur reporting unit recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount	Total Fair Value	Level 3	Total Impairment
Pullmantur Goodwill (1)	—	—	—	123,814
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names (2)	—	—	—	174,285
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels (3)	147,900	147,900	147,900	113,168
Total	147,900	147,900	147,900	411,267

(1) We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions was the decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur's fleet. The discounted cash flow model used our 2016 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years’ cash flows through 2020 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur’s reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur’s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 11%.

(2) We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asset using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. These trademarks and trade names relate to Pullmantur and we have used a discount rate of 11.5%, comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit.

(3) We estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using the market approach for the aircraft and a blended indication from the cost and market approaches for the vessels. A significant input in performing the fair value assessments for these assets was comparable market transactions.

We have master International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreements in place with our derivative instrument counterparties. These ISDA agreements provide for final close out netting with our counterparties for all positions in the case of default or termination of the ISDA agreement. We have determined that our ISDA agreements provide us with rights of setoff on the fair value of derivative instruments in a gain position and those in a loss position with the same counterparty. We have elected not to offset such derivative instrument fair values in our consolidated balance sheets.

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, no cash collateral was received or pledged under our ISDA agreements. See Credit Related Contingent Features for further discussion on contingent collateral requirements for our derivative instruments.

14

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial assets under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:

	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015									As of December 31, 2014
	Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	113,279	$	(112,567	)	$	—	$	712	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—
Total	$	113,279	$	(112,567	)	$	—	$	712	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial liabilities under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:

	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015										As of December 31, 2014
	Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	(925,202	)	$	112,567	$	—	$	(812,635	)	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)
Total	$	(925,202	)	$	112,567	$	—	$	(812,635	)	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)

Concentrations of Credit Risk

We monitor our credit risk associated with financial and other institutions with which we conduct significant business and, to minimize these risks, we select counterparties with credit risks acceptable to us and we seek to limit our exposure to an individual counterparty. Credit risk, including but not limited to counterparty nonperformance under derivative instruments, our credit facilities and new ship progress payment guarantees, is not considered significant, as we primarily conduct business with large, well-established financial institutions, insurance companies and export credit agencies many of which we have long-term relationships with and which have credit risks acceptable to us or where the credit risk is spread out among a large number of counterparties. As of September 30, 2015, our exposure under our derivative instruments was approximately $0.7 million. As of December 31, 2014, we did not have any exposure under our derivative instruments. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any of our significant counterparties. In addition, we have established guidelines we follow regarding credit ratings and instrument maturities to maintain safety and liquidity. We do not normally require collateral or other security to support credit relationships; however, in certain circumstances this option is available to us.

Derivative Instruments

We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. We manage these risks through a combination of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our

15

hedging practices and policies. The financial impact of these hedging instruments is primarily offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. We achieve this by closely matching the notional amount, term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged. Although certain of our derivative financial instruments do not qualify or are not accounted for under hedge accounting, we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. We monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses.

We enter into various forward, swap and option contracts to manage our interest rate exposure and to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. These instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and the vast majority are designated as hedges. We also have non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in our foreign operations and investments.

At inception of the hedge relationship, a derivative instrument that hedges the exposure to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or a recognized asset or liability is designated as a fair value hedge. A derivative instrument that hedges a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments. Gains and losses on derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss of our non-derivative financial instruments and the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign operations and investments are recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss along with the associated foreign currency translation adjustment of the foreign operation.

On an ongoing basis, we assess whether derivatives used in hedging transactions are “highly effective” in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flow of hedged items. We use the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis for each hedge relationship under our interest rate, foreign currency and fuel hedging programs. We apply the same methodology on a consistent basis for assessing hedge effectiveness to all hedges within each hedging program (i.e. interest rate, foreign currency and fuel). We perform regression analyses over an observation period of up to three years, utilizing market data relevant to the hedge horizon of each hedge relationship. High effectiveness is achieved when a statistically valid relationship reflects a high degree of offset and correlation between the changes in the fair values of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. The determination of ineffectiveness is based on the amount of dollar offset between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item at the end of the reporting period. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or hedge accounting is discontinued, any change in fair value of the derivative since the last date at which it was determined to be effective is recognized in earnings. In addition, the ineffective portion of our highly effective hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and reported in Other income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Cash flows from derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. In the event that hedge accounting is discontinued, cash flows subsequent to the date of discontinuance are classified within investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are classified as investing activities.

We consider the classification of the underlying hedged item’s cash flows in determining the classification for the designated derivative instrument’s cash flows. We classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of benchmark interest rate or hedges of fuel expense as operating activities due to the nature of the hedged item. Likewise, we classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on our newbuild ship payments as investing activities and derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on debt payments as financing activities.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our long-term debt obligations including future interest payments. At September 30, 2015, approximately 33.0% of our long-term debt was effectively fixed as compared to 28.5% as of December 31, 2014. We use interest rate swap agreements to modify our exposure to interest rate movements and to manage our interest expense.

Market risk associated with our long-term fixed rate debt is the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating-rate basis to manage this risk. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the $420.0 million fixed rate portion of our Oasis of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan and on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes due 2022. The interest rate swap agreements on Oasis of the Seas debt effectively changed the interest rate on the balance of the unsecured term loan, which was $227.5 million as of September 30, 2015, from a fixed rate of 5.41% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.87%, currently approximately 4.28%. The interest rate swap agreements on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes effectively changed the interest rate of the unsecured senior notes from a fixed rate of

16

5.25% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.63%, currently approximately 3.95%. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges.

Market risk associated with our long-term floating rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis to manage this risk. In May 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements that hedge the anticipated unsecured amortizing term loan that will finance a portion of our purchase of Harmony of the Seas. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging the Harmony of the Seas loan will effectively convert the interest rate for €693.4 million, or approximately $774.2 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015, of the anticipated loan balance from EURIBOR plus 1.15% to a fixed rate of 2.26% (inclusive of margin) beginning in May 2016. In September 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements that hedge the anticipated unsecured amortizing term loan that will finance our purchase of Ovation of the Seas. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging the Ovation of the Seas loan will effectively convert the interest rate for $830.0 million of the anticipated loan balance from LIBOR plus 1.00% to a fixed rate of 3.16% (inclusive of margin) beginning in April 2016. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

In addition, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our Celebrity Reflection term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the Celebrity Reflection unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $518.1 million from LIBOR plus 0.40% to a fixed rate (including applicable margin) of 2.85% through the term of the loan. Additionally, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our Quantum of the Seas term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the Quantum of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $704.4 million from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.74% (inclusive of margin) through the term of the loan. Furthermore, at September 30, 2015, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our Anthem of the Seas term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the Anthem of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $725.0 million from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.86% (inclusive of margin) through the term of the loan. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements related to outstanding debt and on our current unfunded financing arrangements as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $4.4 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Derivative Instruments

Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to our ship construction contracts denominated in Euros, our foreign currency denominated debt and our international business operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements to manage portions of the exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As of September 30, 2015, the aggregate cost of our ships on order, not including the "Project Edge" ships and the TUI Cruises' ships on order, was approximately $5.0 billion, of which we had deposited $449.8 million as of such date. Approximately 43.7% and 28.8% of the aggregate cost of the ships under construction was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow, fair value or net investment hedges depending on the designation of the related hedge.

On a regular basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and, from time to time, we utilize cross-currency swap agreements to minimize the volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than our functional currency or the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries. During the third quarter of 2015, we maintained an average of approximately $517.2 million of these foreign currency forward contracts. These instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts resulted in a loss, of approximately $32.7 million and $35.1 million, respectively, during the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, and approximately $49.6 million and $24.2 million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, that were recognized in earnings within Other income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

We consider our investments in our foreign operations to be denominated in relatively stable currencies and of a long-term nature. As of September 30, 2015, we maintained foreign currency forward contracts of €415.6 million, or approximately $464.0 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015, and designated them as hedges of a portion of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises. These forward currency contracts mature in April 2016.

The notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts including our forward contracts and collar options as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $2.5 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively.

17

Non-Derivative Instruments

We also address the exposure of our investments in foreign operations by denominating a portion of our debt in our subsidiaries’ and investments’ functional currencies and designating it as a hedge of these subsidiaries and investments. We had designated debt as a hedge of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises of approximately €185.9 million and €139.4 million, or approximately $207.6 million and $168.7 million, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Fuel Price Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates primarily to the consumption of fuel on our ships. We use fuel swap agreements to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices.

Our fuel swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At September 30, 2015, we have hedged the variability in future cash flows for certain forecasted fuel transactions occurring through 2019. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements:

	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015	As of December 31, 2014
	(metric tons)
2015	197,000	806,000
2016	930,000	802,000
2017	854,000	525,000
2018	583,000	226,000
2019	153,000	—

	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
	(% hedged)
Projected fuel purchases:
2015	57	%	58	%
2016	65	%	55	%
2017	59	%	35	%
2018	40	%	15	%
2019	10	%	—

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $252.0 million and $223.1 million, respectively, of estimated unrealized net loss associated with our cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements were expected to be reclassified to earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive loss within the next twelve months. Reclassification is expected to occur as the result of fuel consumption associated with our hedged forecasted fuel purchases.

18

The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
	Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014		Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
		Fair Value		Fair Value			Fair Value		Fair Value
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20(1)
Interest rate swaps	Other assets	$	1,691	$	—	Other long-term liabilities	$	93,807	$	65,768
Foreign currency forward contracts	Derivative financial instruments	107,668		—		Derivative financial instruments	292,372		17,619
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other assets	—		63,981		Other long-term liabilities	—		164,627
Foreign currency collar options	Derivative financial instruments	—		—		Derivative financial instruments	—		21,855
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments	—		—		Derivative financial instruments	239,715		227,512
Fuel swaps	Other assets	—		—		Other long-term liabilities	277,158		270,254
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under 815-20		109,359		63,981			903,052		767,635
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments	3,079		—		Derivative financial instruments	17,437		—
Fuel swaps	Other Assets	841		—		Other long-term liabilities	4,713		—
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under 815-20		3,920		—			22,150		—
Total derivatives		$	113,279	$	63,981		$	925,202	$	767,635

(1)Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

		Carrying Value
Non-derivative instrument designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815-20	Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign currency debt	Long-term debt	$	207,585	$	168,718
		$	207,585	$	168,718

19

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:

Derivatives and Related Hedged Items under ASC 815-20 Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative									Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015		Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	2,793	$	3,063		$	8,640	$	9,199	$	3,968		$	3,968	$	11,775		$	13,435
Interest rate swaps	Other income	22,341		(3,010		)	21,780		24,431		(20,252		)	3,934		(18,245		)	(19,122		)
		$	25,134	$	53		$	30,420	$	33,630	$	(16,284	)	$	7,902	$	(6,470	)	$	(5,687	)

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

Derivatives under  ASC  815-20  Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative  (Effective Portion)												Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income  (Effective Portion)
	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014				Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(261	)
Interest rate swaps	(68,956		)	1,331			(75,104		)	(71,621		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(10,276		)	(3,106		)	(27,024		)	(9,312		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	(619		)	(163,387		)	(131,211		)	(172,629		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(752		)	(450		)	(2,153		)	(1,348		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Other income	(239		)	(238		)	(715		)	(4,052		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	—			—			—			(57		)
Foreign currency collar options	34			(21,904		)	(64,559		)	(30,638		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(568		)	—			(1,003		)	—
Fuel swaps	(230,761		)	(71,456		)	(213,072		)	(64,527		)	Fuel	(65,975		)	(1,996		)	(172,083		)	(1,206		)
	$	(300,302	)	$	(255,416	)	$	(483,946	)	$	(339,415	)		$	(77,810	)	$	(5,790	)	$	(202,978	)	$	(16,236	)

20

Derivatives under ASC 815- 20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Other income	(617		)	17			(395		)	(78		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	—			15			—			(12		)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(2,353		)	(8,069		)	(2,771		)	(7,607		)
		$	(2,970	)	$	(8,037	)	$	(3,166	)	$	(7,697	)

The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  (Effective Portion)
Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20 Net Investment Hedging Relationships	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign Currency Debt	$	(436	)	$	13,408	$	8,955	$	18,038
	$	(436	)	$	13,408	$	8,955	$	18,038

There was no amount recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) for thequarters and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015and September 30, 2014, respectively.

The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

		Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815-20	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	$	(32,705	)	$	(35,175	)	$	(49,607	)	$	(24,405	)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(76		)	(220		)	(191		)	(1,157		)
		$	(32,781	)	$	(35,395	)	$	(49,798	)	$	(25,562	)

Credit Related Contingent Features

Our current interest rate derivative instruments may require us to post collateral if our Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s credit ratings remain below specified levels. Specifically, if on the fifth anniversary of entering into a derivative transaction or on any succeeding fifth-year anniversary our credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt were to be rated below BBB- by Standard & Poor’s and Baa3 by Moody’s, then each counterparty to such derivative transaction with whom we are in a net liability position that exceeds the applicable minimum call amount may demand that we post collateral in an amount equal to the net liability position. The amount of collateral required to be posted following such event will change each time our net liability position increases or decreases by more than the applicable minimum call amount. If our credit rating for our senior unsecured debt is subsequently equal to or above BBB- by Standard & Poor’s or Baa3 by Moody’s, then any collateral posted at such time will be released to us and we will no longer be required to post collateral unless we meet the collateral trigger requirement at the next fifth-year anniversary. Currently, our senior unsecured debt credit rating is BB+ with a stable outlook by Standard & Poor’s and Ba1 with a stable outlook by Moody’s. We currently have seven interest rate derivative hedges that have a term of at least five years.  The aggregate fair values of all derivative instruments with such credit-related contingent features in net liability positions as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $93.8 million and $65.8 million, respectively, which do not include the impact of any such derivatives in net asset positions. The earliest that any of the seven interest rate derivative hedges will reach their fifth anniversary is November 2016. Therefore, as of September 30, 2015, we were not required to post collateral for any of our derivative transactions.

21

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

The discussion under this caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and elsewhere in this document includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding guidance (including our expectations for the fourth quarter and full year of 2015 and our earnings and yield estimates for 2015 set forth under the heading "Outlook" below, expectations regarding the timing and results of our Double-Double Program and our plans with respect to share repurchases), business and industry prospects or future results of operations or financial position, made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking. Words such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "goal," "intend," "may," "plan," "project," "seek," "should," "will" and similar expressions are intended to further identify any of these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management's current expectations but they are based on judgments and are inherently uncertain. Furthermore, they are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied in those forward-looking statements. Examples of these risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and, in particular, the risks discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of that report.

All forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of this document.  Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations has been organized to present the following:

• a review of our financial presentation, including discussion of certain operational and financial metrics we utilize to assist us in managing our business;

• a discussion of our results of operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same periods in 2014;

• a discussion of our business outlook, including our expectations for selected financial items for the fourth quarter and full year of 2015; and

• a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources, including our future capital and contractual commitments and potential funding sources.

Critical Accounting Policies

Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets

Pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the Spanish and Latin American markets. These markets have experienced significant volatility and the brand has adopted various changes to its operating strategy as a result. Most recently, in response to favorable economic expectations in Latin America, especially Brazil, management undertook a positioning of the brand to increase sourcing of guests and to deliver deployment for Latin American consumers; transferring newer and more efficient capacity to the brand; and selling Pullmantur’s non-cruise businesses to allow the brand to focus on the core cruise business.

However, the Latin American resurgence was short lived and the core Latin American economies, including Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Venezuela, have regressed and their currencies have materially depreciated versus the US dollar.  During the second quarter of 2015, as a result of the weakness in Latin America, we decided to defer the scheduled transfer of Royal Caribbean International’s Majesty of the Seas to the Pullmantur fleet. During our most recently completed quarter, the negative economic trends significantly deteriorated. Most notably, the Brazilian Real devalued by approximately 22% relative to the US dollar during the third quarter of 2015.

In light of the increased challenges facing Pullmantur’s Latin American strategy, we recently made a decision to significantly change that strategy from growing the brand through vessel transfers to a right-sizing strategy. This right-sizing strategy includes

22

reducing our exposure to Latin America, refocusing on the brand’s core market of Spain and, consequently, reducing the size of Pullmantur’s fleet. This strategic change includes a decision to redeploy Pullmantur’s Empress to the Royal Caribbean International brand as well as a decision to cancel the intended transfer of the Majesty of the Seas to Pullmantur. As we previously disclosed, the planned growth of the Pullmantur fleet through the transfer of vessels into the brand has been the most significant assumption within Pullmantur's projected cash flows supporting the recoverability of the Pullmantur reporting unit’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names. Our decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur’s fleet significantly decreases the cash flow projections which have been the basis of our impairment analysis.

As a result of these developments, we performed an interim impairment evaluation of Pullmantur’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The estimation of future cash flows requires our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues, operating costs, marketing, selling and administrative expenses, interest rates, ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry’s competitive environment and general and economic business conditions, among other factors.

Due to the previously described market conditions and our recent decision to reduce our exposure to Latin America, refocus on the brand’s core Spanish market and reduce the brand's overall capacity, we reviewed the two-step goodwill impairment test based on the updated cash flow projections. As a result of this analysis, we determined that the carrying value of the Pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its fair value. Similarly, we determined that the carrying value of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names exceeded their fair value as well. Accordingly, upon the completion of the two-step impairment test, we recognized an impairment charge of $123.8 million and $174.3 million for goodwill and trademark and trade names, respectively, during the quarter ended September 30, 2015. These charges reflect the full carrying amounts of the goodwill and trademark and trade names leaving Pullmantur with no intangible assets on its books.

Additionally, in conjunction with performing the two-step goodwill impairment test, we identified that the estimated fair value of certain long-lived assets, consisting of two ships and three aircraft were less than their carrying values. As a result of this determination, we evaluated these assets pursuant to our long-lived asset impairment test. The decision to significantly reduce our exposure to the Latin American market negatively impacted the expected undiscounted cash flows of these vessels and aircraft and resulted in an impairment charge of $113.2 million to write down these assets to their estimated fair values during the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The remaining assets for the Pullmantur reporting unit have fair values greater than or equal to their carrying amounts.

The combined impairment charge of $411.3 million related to Pullmantur’s goodwill, trademarks and trade names, vessels and aircraft was recognized in earnings during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and is reported within Impairment of Pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). For further information on the fair value measurements used to estimate the fair value of these assets, refer to Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Seasonality

Our revenues are seasonal based on demand for cruises. Demand is strongest for cruises during the Northern Hemisphere’s summer months and holidays. In order to mitigate the impact of the winter weather in the Northern Hemisphere and to capitalize on the summer season in the Southern Hemisphere, our brands have focused on deployment to Australia, Latin America and Asia during that period.

Financial Presentation

Description of Certain Line Items

Revenues

Our revenues are comprised of the following:

• Passenger ticket revenues, which consist of revenue recognized from the sale of passenger tickets and the sale of airtransportation to and from our ships; and

23

• Onboard and other revenues, which consist primarily of revenues from the sale of goods and/or services onboard ourships not included in passenger ticket prices, cancellation fees, sales of vacation protection insurance and pre- and post-cruise tours. Additionally, revenue related to Pullmantur’s travel agency network, land-based tours and air charter business to third parties are included in Onboard and other revenues through March 31, 2014, the date of the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses. Onboard and other revenues also includes revenues we receive from independent third party concessionaires that pay us apercentage of their revenues in exchange for the right to provide selected goods and/or services onboard our ships as well as revenues received for procurement and management related services we perform on behalf of our unconsolidated affiliates.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Our cruise operating expenses are comprised of the following:

• Commissions, transportation and other expenses, which consist of those costs directly associated with passenger ticketrevenues, including travel agent commissions, air and other transportation expenses, port costs that vary with passenger head counts and related credit card fees;

• Onboard and other expenses, which consist of the direct costs associated with onboard and other revenues, includingthe costs of products sold onboard our ships, vacation protection insurance premiums, costs associated with pre- and post-cruise tours and related credit card fees as well as the minimal costs associated with concession revenues, as the costs are mostly incurred by third-party concessionaires and costs incurred for the procurement and management related services we perform on behalf of our unconsolidated affiliates;

• Payroll and related expenses, which consist of costs for shipboard personnel (costs associated with our shoreside personnel are included in Marketing, selling and administrative expenses);

•Food expenses, which include food costs for both guests and crew;

• Fuel expenses, which include fuel and related delivery and storage costs, including the financial impact of fuel swapagreements; and

• Other operating expenses, which consist primarily of operating costs such as repairs and maintenance, port costs that do not vary with passenger head counts, vessel related insurance and entertainment. Additionally, costs associated with Pullmantur’s travel agency network, land-based tours and air charter business to third parties are included in Other operating expenses through March 31, 2014, the date of the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses.

We do not allocate payroll and related expenses, food expenses, fuel expenses or other operating expenses to the expense categories attributable to passenger ticket revenues or onboard and other revenues since they are incurred to provide the total cruise vacation experience.

Selected Operational and Financial Metrics

We utilize a variety of operational and financial metrics which are defined below to evaluate our performance and financial condition. As discussed in more detail herein, certain of these metrics are non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe provide useful information to investors as a supplement to our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. The presentation of non-GAAP financial information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

Adjusted Earnings per Share represents Adjusted Net Income divided by weighted average shares outstanding or by diluted weighted average shares outstanding, as applicable. We believe that this non-GAAP measure is meaningful when assessing our performance on a comparative basis.

Adjusted Net Income represents net income excluding certain items that we believe adjusting for is meaningful when assessing our performance on a comparative basis. For the periods presented, these items included the impairment of the Pullmantur related assets, restructuring charges, other costs related to our profitability initiatives, the estimated impact of the divested Pullmantur non-core businesses for periods prior to the sales transaction, the loss recognized on the sale of Celebrity Century and the impact of the change in our voyage proration. The estimated impact of the divested Pullmantur non-core businesses was arrived at by adjusting the net income (loss) of these businesses for the ownership percentage we retained, as well as for intercompany transactions that are no longer eliminated in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) subsequent to the sales transaction.

24

Available Passenger Cruise Days (“APCD”) is our measurement of capacity and represents double occupancy per cabin multiplied by the number of cruise days for the period. We use this measure to perform capacity and rate analysis to identify our main non-capacity drivers that cause our cruise revenue and expenses to vary.

Gross Cruise Costs represent the sum of total cruise operating expenses plus marketing, selling and administrative expenses.

Gross Yields represent total revenues per APCD.

Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel represent Gross Cruise Costs excluding commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses and, in the case of Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel, fuel expenses (each of which is described above under the Description of Certain Line Items heading). In measuring our ability to control costs in a manner that positively impacts net income, we believe changes in Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel to be the most relevant indicators of our performance. A reconciliation of historical Gross Cruise Costs to Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel is provided below under Results of Operations. We have not provided a quantitative reconciliation of projected Gross Cruise Costs to projected Net Cruise Costs and projected Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel due to the significant uncertainty in projecting the costs deducted to arrive at these measures. Accordingly, we do not believe that reconciling information for such projected figures would be meaningful. For the periods prior to the sale of the Pullmantur non-core businesses, Net Cruise Costs excludes the estimated impact of these divested businesses. Net Cruise Costs also excludes initiative costs reported within Cruise operating expenses and Marketing, selling and administrative expenses, as well as the loss recognized on the sale of Celebrity Century included within Other Operating Expenses.

Net Revenues represent total revenues less commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses (each of which is described above under the Description of Certain Line Items heading). For the periods prior to the sale of the Pullmantur non-core businesses, we have presented Net Revenues excluding the estimated impact of these divested businesses.

Net Yields represent Net Revenues per APCD. We utilize Net Revenues and Net Yields to manage our business on a day-to-day basis as we believe that it is the most relevant measure of our pricing performance because it reflects the cruise revenues earned by us net of our most significant variable costs, which are commissions, transportation and other expenses and onboard and other expenses. A reconciliation of historical Gross Yields to Net Yields is provided below under Results of Operations. We have not provided a quantitative reconciliation of projected Gross Yields to projected Net Yields due to the significant uncertainty in projecting the costs deducted to arrive at this measure. Accordingly, we do not believe that reconciling information for such projected figures would be meaningful. For the periods prior to the sale of the Pullmantur non-core businesses, Net Yields excludes the estimated impact of these divested businesses.

Occupancy, in accordance with cruise vacation industry practice, is calculated by dividing Passenger Cruise Days by APCD.  A percentage in excess of 100% indicates that three or more passengers occupied some cabins.

Passenger Cruise Days represent the number of passengers carried for the period multiplied by the number of days of their respective cruises.

We believe Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel are our most relevant non-GAAP financial measures. However, a significant portion of our revenue and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar. Because our reporting currency is the United States dollar, the value of these revenues and expenses can be affected by changes in currency exchange rates. Although such changes in local currency prices is just one of many elements impacting our revenues and expenses, it can be an important element. For this reason, we also monitor Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel as if the current periods’ currency exchange rates had remained constant with the comparable prior periods’ rates, or on a “Constant Currency” basis.

It should be emphasized that Constant Currency is primarily used for comparing short-term changes and/or projections. Changes in guest sourcing and shifting the amount of purchases between currencies can change the impact of the purely currency-based fluctuations.

The use of certain significant non-GAAP measures, such as Net Yields, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel, allows us to perform capacity and rate analysis to separate the impact of known capacity changes from other less predictable changes which affect our business. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide expanded insight to measure revenue and cost performance in addition to the standard United States GAAP based financial measures. There are no specific rules or regulations for determining non-GAAP and Constant Currency measures, and as such, there exists the possibility that they may not be comparable to other companies within the industry.

25

Results of Operations

Summary

Our net income and Adjusted Net Income for the third quarter of 2015 was $228.8 million and $628.1 million, or $1.03 and $2.84 per share on a diluted basis, as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $490.2 million and $492.9 million, or $2.19 and $2.20 per share on a diluted basis, respectively, for the third quarter of 2014.

Our net income and Adjusted Net Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $459.0 million and $858.3 million, or $2.08 and $3.88 per share on a diluted basis, as compared to net income and Adjusted Net Income of $654.4 million and $685.7 million, or $2.93 and $3.07 per share on a diluted basis, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Significant items for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 include:

• In September 2015, we recognized an impairment charge of $399.3 million, net of a $12.0 million deferred tax benefit, to write down Pullmantur's goodwill to its implied fair value and to write down trademarks and trade names and certain long-lived assets to their fair value. Refer to Note 3. Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets for further discussion.

• The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket and onboard and other revenue transactions and cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar, resulted in a decrease to total revenues of $126.5 million and $302.7 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2014 and a decrease to cruise operating expenses of $50.7 million and $131.5 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2014;

• A decrease of $37.2 million and $37.9 million to total revenues and cruises operating expenses, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 due to Pullmantur's non-core businesses that were sold in 2014;

• Total revenues, excluding the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the decrease in revenues from the sale of Pullmantur’s non-core businesses discussed above, increased 10.9% and 7.7% for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2014. The increase was primarily due to a 6.7% and 5.2% increase in capacity for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration;

• Total Cruise operating expenses, excluding the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the decrease in cruise operating expenses from the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses discussed above, remained consistent for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to the corresponding periods in 2014.

• As of September 30, 2014, we changed our voyage recognition methodology and recognize passenger ticket revenues, revenues from onboard and other goods and services and all associated cruise operating costs for all of our uncompleted voyages on a pro-rata basis. The effect of the change is a decrease to net income of $31.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and a decrease to net income of $53.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same periods in 2014.

Other Items

• In March 2015, we announced the pending sale of Splendour of the Seas to TUI Cruises GmbH, our 50%-owned joint venture. The sale for €188 million is scheduled to be completed in April 2016 in order to retain the future revenues to be generated for sailings through that date. After the sale, TUI Cruises will lease the ship to Thomson Cruises, which will operate the ship. The purchase price will be financed by us under a secured credit agreement to be repaid over 10 years. The resulting term loan will be 50% guaranteed by TUI AG, our joint venture partner, and will be secured by a first mortgage on the ship. Interest will accrue at the rate of 6.25% per annum. We executed certain forward contracts to lock in the sales price of the ship at approximately $213 million. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our consolidated financial statements.

26

• In April 2015, we took delivery of Anthem of the Seas. To finance the purchase, we borrowed $742.1 million under a previously committed 12-year unsecured term loan, which is 95% guaranteed by Hermes. Refer to Note 6. Long-Term Debt for further information.

• In May 2015, TUI Cruises, our 50% joint venture, took delivery of Mein Schiff 4.

• In June 2015, we entered into an agreement with Meyer Werft to build the fourth Quantum-class ship for Royal Caribbean International. We have also received a commitment for the unsecured financing of up to 80% of the ship’s contract price. Hermes has agreed to guarantee to the lenders payment of 95% of the financing. Refer to Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies for further information.

• In June 2015, TUI Cruises placed orders with Meyer Turku to build two new ships. The ships will each have a capacity of approximately 2,850 berths and are expected to enter service each of 2018 and 2019. Refer to Note 5. Other Assets for further information.

• In June 2015, we amended and restated our $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due July 2016. The amendment reduced the applicable margin and facility fee and extended the termination date to June 2020. Refer to Note 6. Long-term Debt to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

• In July 2015, we amended our $380.0 million, €365.0 million, $290.0 million and $65.0 million unsecured term loans due at various dates from 2016 through 2019 to reduce the applicable margins. Additionally, the termination date of the $290 million unsecured term loan was extended from February 2016 to February 2018. We also amended our $1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due August 2018 to reduce pricing in line with the amended pricing of the $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility. Refer to Note 6. Long-term Debt to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

Operating results for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the same periods in 2014 are shown in the following table (in thousands, except per share data):

27

	Quarter Ended September 30,										Nine months ended September 30,
	2015					2014					2015					2014
				% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues					% of Total Revenues
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,873,942		74.3	%	$	1,786,746		74.8	%	$	4,688,189		73.3	%	$	4,590,048		73.4	%
Onboard and other revenues	649,158			25.7	%	602,016			25.2	%	1,708,832			26.7	%	1,665,981			26.6	%
Total revenues	2,523,100			100.0	%	2,388,762			100.0	%	6,397,021			100.0	%	6,256,029			100.0	%
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	413,156			16.4	%	396,916			16.6	%	1,093,409			17.1	%	1,068,961			17.1	%
Onboard and other	175,214			6.9	%	182,658			7.6	%	438,558			6.9	%	456,296			7.3	%
Payroll and related	217,627			8.6	%	214,260			9.0	%	647,788			10.1	%	634,232			10.1	%
Food	122,124			4.8	%	120,908			5.1	%	361,317			5.6	%	358,172			5.7	%
Fuel	199,848			7.9	%	230,818			9.7	%	607,689			9.5	%	718,081			11.5	%
Other operating	259,057			10.3	%	281,322			11.8	%	777,291			12.2	%	825,794			13.2	%
Total cruise operating expenses	1,387,026			55.0	%	1,426,882			59.7	%	3,926,052			61.4	%	4,061,536			64.9	%
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	256,060			10.1	%	239,662			10.0	%	817,040			12.8	%	790,957			12.6	%
Depreciation and amortization expenses	210,742			8.4	%	192,448			8.1	%	617,678			9.7	%	579,063			9.3	%
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267			16.3	%	—			—	%	411,267			6.4	%	—			—	%
Restructuring charges	—			—		308			—	%	—			—		1,958			—	%
Operating Income	258,005			10.2	%	529,462			22.2	%	624,984			9.8	%	822,515			13.1	%
Other income (expense):
Interest income	1,735			0.1	%	2,117			0.1	%	8,244			0.1	%	8,023			0.1	%
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(66,819		)	(2.6	)%	(60,100		)	(2.5	)%	(213,598		)	(3.3	)%	(193,931		)	(3.1	)%
Other income	35,866			1.4	%	18,769			0.8	%	39,354			0.6	%	17,771			0.3	%
	(29,218		)	(1.2	)%	(39,214		)	(1.6	)%	(166,000		)	(2.6	)%	(168,137		)	(2.7	)%
Net Income	$	228,787		9.1	%	$	490,248		20.5	%	$	458,984		7.2	%	$	654,378		10.5	%
Diluted Earnings per Share	$	1.03				$	2.19				$	2.08				$	2.93

28

Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Share were calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Quarter Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014			2015		2014
Adjusted Net Income	$	628,070	$	492,853		$	858,267	$	685,681
Net income	228,787		490,248			458,984		654,378
Net Adjustments to Net Income- Increase	$	399,283	$	2,605		$	399,283	$	31,303
Adjustments to Net Income:
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets(1)	$	399,283	$	—		$	399,283	$	—
Restructuring charges	—		308			—		1,958
Other initiative costs	—		1,240			—		17,275
Estimated impact of divested businesses prior to sales transaction	—		—			—		11,013
Loss on sale of ship included within other operating expenses	—		17,401			—		17,401
Impact of voyage proration change	—		(16,344		)	—		(16,344		)
Net Adjustments to Net Income- Increase	$	399,283	$	2,605		$	399,283	$	31,303
Basic:
Earnings per Share	$	1.04	$	2.20		$	2.09	$	2.95
Adjusted Earnings per Share	$	2.86	$	2.21		$	3.90	$	3.09
Diluted:
Earnings per Share	$	1.03	$	2.19		$	2.08	$	2.93
Adjusted Earnings per Share	$	2.84	$	2.20		$	3.88	$	3.07
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic	219,963		222,523			219,835		222,007
Diluted	221,137		223,859			220,979		223,351

⁽¹⁾ Includes a net income tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment.

Selected statistical information is shown in the following table:

	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Passengers Carried	1,403,650		1,324,993		4,053,451		3,886,823
Passenger Cruise Days	10,176,750		9,603,329		28,856,742		27,489,584
APCD	9,465,368		8,867,375		27,284,750		25,948,292
Occupancy	107.5	%	108.3	%	105.8	%	105.9	%

29

Gross Yields and Net Yields were calculated as follows (in thousands, except APCD and Yields):

	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2015 On a Constant Currency Basis		2014		2015		2015 On a Constant Currency Basis		2014
Passenger ticket revenues	$	1,873,942	$	1,981,570	$	1,786,746	$	4,688,189	$	4,948,954	$	4,590,048
Onboard and other revenues	649,158		668,056		602,016		1,708,832		1,750,784		1,665,981
Total revenues	2,523,100		2,649,626		2,388,762		6,397,021		6,699,738		6,256,029
Less:
Commissions, transportation and other	413,156		435,432		396,916		1,093,409		1,150,556		1,068,961
Onboard and other	175,214		185,411		182,658		438,558		457,838		456,296
Net Revenues including divested businesses	1,934,730		2,028,783		1,809,188		4,865,054		5,091,344		4,730,772
Less:
Net Revenues related to divested businesses prior to sales transaction	—		—		—		—		—		35,656
Net Revenues	$	1,934,730	$	2,028,783	$	1,809,188	$	4,865,054	$	5,091,344	$	4,695,116
APCD	9,465,368		9,465,368		8,867,375		27,284,750		27,284,750		25,948,292
Gross Yields	$	266.56	$	279.93	$	269.39	$	234.45	$	245.55	$	241.10
Net Yields	$	204.40	$	214.34	$	204.03	$	178.31	$	186.60	$	180.94

30

Gross Cruise Costs, Net Cruise Costs and Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel were calculated as follows (in thousands, except APCD and costs per APCD):

	Quarter Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2015 On a Constant Currency Basis		2014		2015		2015 On a Constant Currency Basis		2014
Total cruise operating expenses	$	1,387,026	$	1,437,727	$	1,426,882	$	3,926,052	$	4,057,559	$	4,061,536
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	256,060		264,558		239,662		817,040		846,229		790,957
Gross Cruise Costs	1,643,086		1,702,285		1,666,544		4,743,092		4,903,788		4,852,493
Less:
Commissions, transportation and other	413,156		435,432		396,916		1,093,409		1,150,556		1,068,961
Onboard and other	175,214		185,411		182,658		438,558		457,838		456,296
Net Cruise Costs including divested businesses	1,054,716		1,081,442		1,086,970		3,211,125		3,295,394		3,327,236
Less:
Net Cruise Costs related to divested businesses prior to sales transaction	—		—		—		—		—		47,854
Other initiative costs included within cruise operating expenses and marketing, selling and administrative expenses	—		—		1,240		—		—		15,036
Loss on sale of ship included within other operating expenses	—		—		17,401		—		—		17,401
Net Cruise Costs	1,054,716		1,081,442		1,068,329		3,211,125		3,295,394		3,246,945
Less:
Fuel	199,848		203,145		230,818		607,689		615,035		718,081
Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel	$	854,868	$	878,297	$	837,511	$	2,603,436	$	2,680,359	$	2,528,864
APCD	9,465,368		9,465,368		8,867,375		27,284,750		27,284,750		25,948,292
Gross Cruise Costs per APCD	$	173.59	$	179.84	$	187.94	$	173.84	$	179.73	$	187.01
Net Cruise Cost per APCD	$	111.43	$	114.25	$	120.48	$	117.69	$	120.78	$	125.13
Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD	$	90.32	$	92.79	$	94.45	$	95.42	$	98.24	$	97.46

31

2015 Outlook

On October 23, 2015, we announced the following full year and fourth quarter 2015 guidance based on fuel pricing, interest rates and currency exchange rates at that time:

Full Year 2015

	As Reported	Constant Currency
Net Yields	Approx. (1.0%)	Approx. 3.5%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD	Approx. (6.5%)	Approx. (4.5%)
Net Cruise Costs per APCD, Excluding Fuel	(3.5%) to (2.5%)	Flat to down 1.0%
Capacity Increase	5.4%
Depreciation and Amortization	$827 to $831 million
Interest Expense, net	$264 to $268 million
Fuel Consumption (metric tons)	1,363,000
Fuel Expenses	$800 million
Percent Hedged (fwd consumption)	57%
Impact of 10% change in fuel prices	$5.0 million
Adjusted Earnings per Share-Diluted	Approx. $4.80

Fourth Quarter 2015

	As Reported	Constant Currency
Net Yields	1.3% to 1.8%	4.5% to 5.0%
Net Cruise Costs per APCD	Approx. (8.5%)	Approx. (7.5%)
Net Cruise Costs per APCD, Excluding Fuel	Approx. (5.0%)	Approx. (4.0%)
Capacity Increase	6.1%
Depreciation and Amortization	$210 to $214 million
Interest Expense, net	$59 to $63 million
Fuel Consumption (metric tons)	342,000
Fuel Expenses	$193 million
Percent Hedged (fwd consumption)	57%
Impact of 10% change in fuel prices	$5.0 million
Adjusted Earnings per Share-Diluted	Approx. $0.90

Volatility in foreign currency exchange rates affects the US dollar value of our earnings. Based on our highest net exposure for each quarter and the full year 2015, the top five foreign currencies are ranked below. For example, the British Pound is the most impactful in all quarters, except in the first quarter of 2015 where it is the fourth most impactful. The first, second and third quarters of 2015 rankings are based on actual results. Rankings for the remaining quarter and full year are based on estimated net exposures.

Ranking	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	FY 2015
1	CAD	GBP	GBP	GBP	GBP
2	AUD	AUD	EUR	AUD	CAD
3	BRL	CAD	CNY	CAD	AUD
4	GBP	EUR	CAD	EUR	BRL
5	MXN	BRL	AUD	MXN	CNY

32

The currency abbreviations above are defined as follows:

Currency Abbreviation	Currency
AUD	Australian Dollar
BRL	Brazilian Real
CAD	Canadian Dollar
CNY	Chinese Yuan
EUR	Euro
GBP	British Dollar
MXN	Mexican Peso

Quarter Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Quarter Ended September 30, 2014

In this section, references to 2015 refer to the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and references to 2014 refer to the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

Revenues

Total revenues for 2015 increased $134.3 million, or 5.6%, to $2.5 billion in 2015 from $2.4 billion in 2014.

Passenger ticket revenues comprised 74.3% of our 2015 total revenues. Passenger ticket revenues for 2015 increased by $87.2 million, or 4.9%, from 2014. The increase was primarily due to:

• a 6.7% increase in capacity, which increased passenger ticket revenues by$120.5 million, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration; and

• an increase in ticket prices across most of our core itineraries that contributed to a $74.3 million aggregate increase in passenger ticket revenues.

The increase was partially offset by an approximate $107.6 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.

The remaining 25.7% of 2015 total revenues was comprised of onboard and other revenues, which increased $47.1 million, or 7.8%, to $649.2 million in 2015 from $602.0 million in 2014. The increase in onboard and other revenues was primarily due to:

• a $39.4 million increase attributable to the 6.7% increase in capacity noted above, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration; and

• a $27.7 million increase in onboard revenue attributable to higher spending on a per passenger basis primarily due to our revenue enhancing initiatives, including various beverage initiatives, and the increased revenue associated with internet and other telecommunication services.

The increase was partially offset by an approximate $18.9 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our onboard and other revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.

Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $98.9 million in 2015 and $84.1 million in 2014.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Total cruise operating expenses for 2015 decreased $39.9 million, or 2.8%, from 2014. The decrease was primarily due to:

• a $43.2 million decrease in fuel expense, excluding the impact of the increase in capacity. The price of fuel (net of the financial impact of fuel swap agreements) for 2015 decreased 14.2% per metric ton compared to 2014;

33

• an approximate $50.7 million favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar;

• a $17.4 million loss incurred in 2014 due to the sale of Celebrity Century that did not recur in 2015;

• an $11.3 million decrease in port activities expense mainly due to itinerary changes; and

• an $8.2 million decrease in air expense mainly due to itinerary changes.

The decrease was partially offset by a $95.1 million increase attributable to the 6.7% increase in capacity noted above, net of the favorable impact of the change in our voyage proration.

Marketing, Selling and Administrative Expenses

Marketing, selling and administrative expenses for 2015 increased $16.4 million, or 6.8%, to $256.1 million in 2015 from $239.7 million for the same period in 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in advertising spending mainly relating to our initiatives in the North American market, an increase in payroll and benefits primarily due to an increase in our stock price over the past year related to our performance share awards and higher IT labor costs resulting from the addition of projects and initiatives in 2015. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in administrative expenses mainly driven by the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses in 2014 and savings realized from our cost containment initiatives.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for 2015 increased $18.3 million, or 9.5%, to $210.7 million from $192.4 million in 2014. The increase was primarily due to the addition of Quantum of the Seas and Anthem of the Seas into our fleet, new shipboard additions associated with our ship upgrade projects and, to a lesser extent, the acquisition of Brilliance of the Seas, which was previously under lease, partially offset by the sale of Celebrity Century in September 2014.

Impairment of Pullmantur related assets

During 2015, we recognized an impairment charge of $411.3 million to write down Pullmantur's goodwill to its implied fair value and to write down trademarks and trade names and certain long-lived assets, consisting of three aircraft owned and operated by Pullmantur Air and two ships owned and operated by Pullmantur, to their fair value.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized for 2015increased $6.7 million, or 11.2%, to $66.8 million from $60.1 million in 2014. The increase was primarily due to a higher average debt level attributable to the financing of Quantum of the Seas and Anthem of the Seas.

Other income in 2015 was $35.9 million compared to $18.8 million in 2014. The increase of $17.1 million was primarily due to income of $38.4 million from our equity method investments in 2015 compared to income of $25.7 million in 2014, a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million resulting from the impairment of the Pullmantur related assets and an ineffectiveness gain of $0.2 million in 2015 compared to an ineffectiveness loss of $7.1 million in 2014 on our interest rate and fuel swaps. The increase in other income was partially offset by $5.8 million in foreign exchange losses from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency in 2015 compared to a gain of $3.3 million in 2014.

Net Yields

Net Yields remained consistent compared to 2014. Net Yields increased 5.1% in 2015 compared to 2014 on a Constant Currency basis primarily due to the increase in passenger ticket and onboard and other revenues discussed above.

Net Cruise Costs

Net Cruise Costs decreased 1.3% compared to 2014. Net Cruise Costs per APCD decreased 7.5% in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the decrease in fuel expense and the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar. Net Cruise Costs per APCD on a Constant Currency basis decreased 5.2% in 2015 compared to 2014.

34

Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel

Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD decreased 4.4% compared to 2014. Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD on a Constant Currency basis decreased 1.8% due to a decrease in cruise operating expenses as discussed above.

Other Comprehensive Income (loss)

Other comprehensive loss decreased by $46.2 million in 2015 compared to 2014 due to a $27.1 million decrease in losses mostly on our cash flow derivative hedges resulting from the settlement of fuel cash flow hedges in a loss position during 2015 and a $14.3 million decrease in foreign currency translation losses.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

In this section, references to 2015 refer to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and references to 2014 refer to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Revenues

Total revenues for 2015 increased $141.0 million, or 2.3%, from 2014.

Passenger ticket revenues comprised 73.3% of our 2015 total revenues. Passenger ticket revenues for 2015 increased by $98.1 million, or 2.1%, from 2014. The increase was primarily due to:

• a 5.2% increase in capacity, which increased passenger ticket revenues by $236.4 million, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration; and

• an increase of $122.5 million in ticket prices primarily driven by Quantum of the Seas and Anthem of the Seas as well as higher pricing on Europe, Alaska and Bermuda sailings.

The increase was partially offset by an approximate $260.8 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.

The remaining 26.7% of 2015 total revenues was comprised of onboard and other revenues, which increased $42.9 million, or 2.6%, in 2015 from 2014. The increase in onboard and other revenues was primarily due to:

• an $81.5 million increase attributable to the 5.2% increase in capacity noted above, net of the unfavorable impact of the change in our voyage proration; and

• a $33.0 million increase in onboard revenue attributable to higher spending on a per passenger basis primarily due to our revenue enhancing initiatives, including various beverage initiatives, and the increased revenue associated with internet and other telecommunication services.

The increase was partially offset by:

• an approximate $41.9 million unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our onboard and other revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the US dollar; and

• a $37.2 million decrease in revenues related to Pullmantur's non-core businesses that were sold in 2014.

Onboard and other revenues included concession revenues of $245.4 million in 2015 and $238.8 million in 2014.

Cruise Operating Expenses

Total cruise operating expenses decreased $135.5 million, or 3.3%, to $3.9 billion in 2015 from $4.1 billion in 2014. The decrease was primarily due to:

• a $140.0 million decrease in fuel expense, excluding the impact of the increase in capacity. The price of fuel (net of the financial impact of fuel swap agreements) for 2015 decreased 15.5% per metric ton compared to 2014;

35

• an approximate $131.5 million favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar;

• a $37.9 million decrease in expenses related to Pullmantur's non-core businesses that were sold in 2014; and

• a $17.4 million loss incurred in 2014 due to the sale of Celebrity Century that did not recur in 2015.

The decrease was partially offset by a $205.6 million increase attributable to a 5.2% increase in capacity noted above, net of the favorable impact of the change in our voyage proration.

Marketing, Selling and Administrative Expenses

Marketing, selling and administrative expenses increased $26.1 million, or 3.3%, to $817.0 million from $791.0 million in 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in advertising spending mainly relating to our initiatives in the North American, Australian and Asian markets, an increase in payroll and benefits primarily due to an increase in our stock price over the past year related to our performance share awards and higher IT labor costs resulting from the addition of projects and initiatives in 2015. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in administrative expenses mainly driven by the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses in 2014 and savings realized from our cost containment initiatives.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for 2015 increased $38.6 million, or 6.7%, to $617.7 million from $579.1 million in 2014. The increase was primarily due to the addition of Quantum of the Seas and Anthem of the Seas into our fleet, new shipboard additions associated with our ship upgrade projects and the acquisition of the Brilliance of the Seas, which was previously under lease, partially offset by the sale of Celebrity Century in September 2014.

Impairment of Pullmantur related assets

During 2015, we recognized an impairment charge of $411.3 million to write down Pullmantur's goodwill to its implied fair value and to write down trademarks and trade names and certain long-lived assets, consisting of three aircraft owned and operated by Pullmantur Air and two ships owned and operated by Pullmantur, to their fair value.

Restructuring Charges

We incurred restructuring charges of approximately $2.0 million in 2014, which did not recur in 2015.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense, net of interest capitalized for 2015increased $19.7 million, or 10.1%, to $213.6 million from $193.9 million in 2014. The increase was primarily due to a higher average debt level attributable to the financing of Quantum of the Seas and Anthem of the Seas, partially offset by lower pricing on debt refinanced in 2014.

Other income in 2015 was $39.4 million compared to $17.8 million in 2014. The increase in income of $21.6 million was primarily due to income of $62.2 million from our equity method investments in 2015 compared to income of $34.7 million in 2014 and a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million resulting from the impairment of the Pullmantur related assets. The increase in other income was partially offset by $17.9 million in foreign exchange losses from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency in 2015 compared to $3.6 million in gains in 2014.

Net Yields

Net Yields decreased 1.5% in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our passenger ticket revenue transactions denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar noted above. Net Yields increased 3.1% in 2015 compared to 2014 on a Constant Currency basis primarily due to the increase in passenger ticket and onboard and other revenues discussed above.

Net Cruise Costs

Net Cruise Costs decreased 1.1% in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to our cruise operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar and the

36

decrease in fuel, partially offset by an increase in capacity. Net Cruise Costs per APCD decreased 5.9% in 2015 compared to 2014. Net Cruise Costs per APCD on a Constant Currency basis decreased 3.5% in 2015 compared to 2014.

Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel

Net Cruise Costs Excluding Fuel per APCD decreased 2.1% in 2015 compared to 2014 and remained consistent in 2015 compared to 2014 on a Constant Currency basis.

Other Comprehensive Loss

Other comprehensive loss decreased by $47.2 million in 2015 compared to 2014 due to a $42.2 million decrease in losses mostly on cash flow derivative hedges resulting from the settlement of fuel cash flow hedges in a loss position during 2015. The decrease in losses was partially offset by a $6.1 million increase in foreign currency translation losses resulting from the strengthening of the US dollar compared to the functional currencies of our foreign investments.

Future Application of Accounting Standards

Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements for further information on Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Cash flow generated from operations provides us with a significant source of liquidity. Net cash provided by operating activities increased $0.1 billion to $1.6 billion for the first nine months in 2015 compared to $1.5 billion for the same period in 2014. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to an increase in cash receipts from customer deposits and a decrease in fuel costs and interest paid for the first nine months in 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.

Net cash used in investing activities was $1.5 billion for the first nine months in 2015 compared to $0.3 billion for the same period in 2014. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in capital expenditures of $801.6 million for the first nine months in 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 primarily due to the delivery of Anthem of the Seas and $220.0 million of proceeds received from the sale of Celebrity Century in 2014 that did not recur in 2015. In addition, during the first nine months of 2015, we paid $158.9 million on settlements on our foreign currency forward contracts compared to $14.8 million during the same period in 2014. The increase was partially offset by an increase in cash received on loans to unconsolidated affiliates of $46.5 million for the first nine months in 2015 compared to the same period in 2014.

Net cash used in financing activities was $0.2 billion for the first nine months in 2015 compared to$1.1 billion for the same period in 2014. This change was primarily due to an increase in debt proceeds of $1.0 billion, a decrease in repayment of debt of $71.2 million, partially offset by an increase in dividends paid of $65.9 million. The increase in debt proceeds was primarily due to the $742.1 million unsecured term loan borrowed in April 2015 to finance the purchase of Anthem of the Seas and higher drawings on our revolving credit facilities during the first nine months of 2015 compared to proceeds received on our $380.0 million unsecured term loan facility during the first nine months of 2014. The decrease in repayment of debt was primarily due to the payment at maturity of our €745.0 million 5.625% unsecured senior notes during the first nine months of 2014 that did not recur in 2015, mostly offset by higher payments on our revolving credit facilities and a bond maturity payment during the first nine months of 2015.

37

Future Capital Commitments

Capital Expenditures

As of September 30, 2015, our brands, including our 50% joint venture, TUI Cruises, had ten ships on order. The expected dates that our ships on order will enter service and their approximate berths are as follows:

Ship	Expected to Enter Service	Approximate Berths
Royal Caribbean International —
Quantum-class:
Ovation of the Seas	2nd Quarter 2016	4,150
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2019	4,150
Oasis-class:
Harmony of the Seas	2nd Quarter 2016	5,450
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2018	5,450
Celebrity Cruises — Project Edge
Unnamed	4th Quarter 2018	2,900
Unnamed	1st Half 2020	2,900
TUI Cruises (50% joint venture)
Mein Schiff 5	2nd Quarter 2016	2,500
Mein Schiff 6	2nd Quarter 2017	2,500
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2018	2,850
Unnamed	2nd Quarter 2019	2,850
	Total Berths	35,700

Our future capital commitments consist primarily of new ship orders. As of September 30, 2015, we had two Quantum-class ships and two Oasis-class ships on order for our Royal Caribbean International brand with an aggregate capacity of approximately 19,200 berths. In October 2015, our conditional agreements with STX France to build two ships of a new generation of Celebrity Cruises ships, known as "Project Edge" became effective. The ships will each have a capacity of approximately 2,900 berths. Refer to Note 6. Long-Term Debt for further information.

As of September 30, 2015, the aggregate cost of our ships on order, not including the "Project Edge" ships and the TUI Cruises' ships on order was approximately $5.0 billion, of which we had deposited $449.8 million as of such date. Approximately 43.7% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2015. Refer to Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies and Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments to our consolidated financial statements under Item 1. Financial Statements.

As of September 30, 2015, we anticipate overall full year capital expenditures will be approximately $1.6 billion for 2015, $2.3 billion for 2016, $0.5 billion for 2017, $2.4 billion for 2018 and $1.3 billion for 2019.

38

Contractual Obligations

As of September 30, 2015, our contractual obligations were as follows (in thousands):

	Payments due by period
			Less than		1-3		3-5		More than
	Total		1 year		years		years		5 years
Operating Activities:
Operating lease obligations(1)	$	235,514	$	22,758	$	37,342	$	24,222	$	151,192
Interest on long-term debt(2)	1,181,354		232,578		368,996		242,826		336,954
Other(3)	811,077		163,196		337,298		192,460		118,123
Investing Activities:	0
Ship purchase obligations(4)	3,510,290		1,648,338		1,112,780		749,172		—
Financing Activities:	0
Long-term debt obligations(5)	8,438,804		896,440		3,021,637		1,830,372		2,690,355
Capital lease obligations(6)	51,132		8,688		11,690		7,209		23,545
Other(7)	79,057		21,483		35,001		18,607		3,966
Total	$	14,307,228	$	2,993,481	$	4,924,744	$	3,064,868	$	3,324,135

(1) We are obligated under noncancelable operating leases primarily for offices, warehouses and motor vehicles. Amounts represent contractual obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.

(2) Long-term debt obligations mature at various dates through fiscal year 2027 and bear interest at fixed and variable rates. Interest on variable-rate debt is calculated based on forecasted debt balances, including interest swapped using the applicable rate at September 30, 2015. Debt denominated in other currencies is calculated based on the applicable exchange rate at September 30, 2015.

(3) Amounts primarily represent future commitments with remaining terms in excess of one year to pay for our usage of certain port facilities, marine consumables, services and maintenance contracts.

(4) Amounts do not include potential obligations which remain subject to cancellation at our sole discretion and

our conditional agreements with STX France for the "Project Edge" ships that became effective in October 2015.

(5) Amounts represent debt obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.

(6) Amounts represent capital lease obligations with initial terms in excess of one year.

(7) Amounts represent fees payable to sovereign guarantors in connection with certain of our export credit debt facilities and facility fees on our revolving credit facilities.

As a normal part of our business, depending on market conditions, pricing and our overall growth strategy, we continuously consider opportunities to enter into contracts for the building of additional ships. We may also consider the sale of ships or the purchase of existing ships. We continuously consider potential acquisitions and strategic alliances. If any of these were to occur, they would be financed through the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the issuance of additional shares of equity securities or through cash flows from operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We and TUI AG have each guaranteed repayment of 50% of a bank loan provided to TUI Cruises which is due 2022. Notwithstanding this, the lenders have agreed to release each shareholder’s guarantee in 2018. As of September 30, 2015, €142.7 million, or approximately $159.3 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015, remains outstanding. Based on current facts and circumstances, we do not believe potential obligations under this guarantee are probable.

TUI Cruises entered into various ship construction and credit agreements that include certain restrictions on each of our and TUI AG’s ability to reduce our current ownership interest in TUI Cruises below 37.55% through 2021.

Some of the contracts that we enter into include indemnification provisions that obligate us to make payments to the counterparty if certain events occur. These contingencies generally relate to changes in taxes, increased lender capital costs and other similar costs. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and are entered into in the normal course of business.  There are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and we are not able to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments, if any, under these indemnification clauses. We have not been required to make

39

any payments under such indemnification clauses in the past and, under current circumstances, we do not believe an indemnification obligation is probable.

Other than the items described above, we are not party to any other off-balance sheet arrangements, including guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interest, certain derivative instruments and variable interest entities, that either have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial position.

Funding Needs and Sources

We have significant contractual obligations of which our debt service obligations and the capital expenditures associated with our ship purchases represent our largest funding needs. As of September 30, 2015, we had approximately $3.0 billion in contractual obligations due through September 30, 2016, of which approximately $0.9 billion relates to debt maturities, $1.6 billion relates to the acquisition of Harmony of the Seas and Ovation of the Seas along with progress payments on our other ship purchases and $232.6 million relates to interest on long-term debt. We have historically relied on a combination of cash flows provided by operations, drawdowns under our available credit facilities, the incurrence of additional debt and/or the refinancing of our existing debt and the issuance of additional shares of equity securities to fund these obligations.

As of September 30, 2015, we had on order two Quantum-class ships and two Oasis-class ships each of which has committed unsecured bank financing arrangements which include sovereign financing guarantees. Refer to Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements for further information.

We had a working capital deficit of $3.5 billion as of September 30, 2015 as compared to a working capital deficit of $3.0 billion as of December 31, 2014. Included within our working capital deficit is $0.9 billion and $0.8 billion of current portion of long-term debt, including capital leases, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The increase in working capital deficit was primarily due to the increase in current liabilities of our foreign currency forward contracts and long-term debt. Similar to others in our industry, we operate with a substantial working capital deficit. This deficit is mainly attributable to the fact that, under our business model, a vast majority of our passenger ticket receipts are collected in advance of the applicable sailing date. These advance passenger receipts remain a current liability until the sailing date. The cash generated from these advance receipts is used interchangeably with cash on hand from other sources, such as our revolving credit facilities and other cash from operations. The cash received as advanced receipts can be used to fund operating expenses for the applicable future sailing or otherwise, pay down our revolving credit facilities, invest in long term investments or any other use of cash. In addition, we have a relatively low-level of accounts receivable and rapid turnover results in a limited investment in inventories. We generate substantial cash flows from operations and our business model, along with our unsecured revolving credit facilities, has historically allowed us to maintain this working capital deficit and still meet our operating, investing and financing needs. We expect that we will continue to have working capital deficits in the future.

In June 2015, we amended and restated our $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due July 2016. The amendment reduced the applicable margin and facility fee and extended the termination date to June 2020.

In July 2015, we amended our $1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due August 2018 to reduce pricing in line with the pricing of the $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility amended in June 2015. At the same time, we also amended our $380.0 million, €365.0 million, $290.0 million and $65.0 million unsecured term loans due at various dates from 2016 through 2019 to reduce the applicable margins, now each 1.75% based on our current debt rating. We also extended the termination date of the $290 million unsecured term loan from February 2016 to February 2018. Refer to Note 6. Long-Term Debt to our consolidated financial statementsfor further information.

As of September 30, 2015, we had liquidity of $1.0 billion, consisting of approximately $147.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $858.0 million available under our unsecured credit facilities. Additionally, in October 2015, we received increased lender commitments for our unsecured revolving credit facility due June 2020 in the amount of $300 million, bringing our total capacity under this facility to $1.4 billion.

We anticipate that our cash flows from operations and our current financing arrangements, as described above, will be adequate to meet our capital expenditures and debt repayments over the next twelve-month period.

In October 2015, our board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program for up to $500 million. On October 23, 2015, we executed an agreement with an investment bank to purchase a total of $200 million, of the $500 million authorized amount, of our common stock under an accelerated stock repurchase (ASR) transaction. Repurchases under the program are expected to be funded from available cash or borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. Under the terms of the ASR agreement, we will receive upfront the majority of the shares of our common stock to be repurchased based on current market prices in

40

exchange for a prepayment of $200 million. The final number of shares to be repurchased will be determined upon settlement based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock during the term of the transaction, less a discount (the "Final Repurchase Price"). Upon final settlement, which is expected no later than the end of January 2016, and depending on the Final Repurchase Price, the investment bank may be required to deliver additional shares of common stock to us or we may be required to deliver shares of common stock or to make a cash payment, at our election, to the investment bank. Future stock repurchase transactions could include open market purchases or additional accelerated share repurchases. We expect to complete the program by the end of 2016. Refer to Note 8. Shareholders' Equity to our consolidated financial statementsfor further information.

If (i) any person other than A. Wilhelmsen AS. and Cruise Associates and their respective affiliates (the “Applicable Group”) acquires ownership of more than 33% of our common stock and the Applicable Group owns less of our common stock than such person, or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, during any 24-month period, a majority of the Board is no longer comprised of individuals who were members of the Board on the first day of such period, we may be obligated to prepay indebtedness outstanding under our ship financing facilities, which we may be unable to replace on similar terms. Our other debt agreements also contain change of control provisions that would be triggered by the acquisition of greater than 50% of our common stock by (i) any person or (ii) in the case of our public debt securities, by a person other than a member of the Applicable Group coupled with a ratings downgrade. If this were to occur, it would have an adverse impact on our liquidity and operations.

Debt Covenants

Certain of our financing agreements contain covenants that require us, among other things, to maintain minimum net worth of at least $6.5 billion, a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.25x and limit our net debt-to-capital ratio to no more than 62.5%.  The fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated by dividing net cash from operations for the past four quarters by the sum of dividend payments plus scheduled principal debt payments in excess of any new financings for the past four quarters. Our minimum net worth and maximum net debt-to-capital calculations exclude the impact of Accumulated other comprehensive loss on Total shareholders’ equity. We were well in excess of all debt covenant requirements as of September 30, 2015. The specific covenants and related definitions can be found in the applicable debt agreements, the majority of which have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For a discussion of our market risks, refer to Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. There have been no significant developments or material changes since the date of our Annual Report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that those controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Readers are cautioned that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that our controls will succeed in achieving their goals under all potential future conditions.

41

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, a class action complaint was filed in June 2011 against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants employed onboard Royal Caribbean International cruise vessels. The complaint alleged that the stateroom attendants were required to pay other crew members to help with their duties and that certain stateroom attendants were required to work back of house assignments without the ability to earn gratuities, in each case in violation of the U.S. Seaman’s Wage Act. In May 2012, the district court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis that the applicable collective bargaining agreement requires any such claims to be arbitrated. The United States Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, affirmed the district court’s dismissal and denied the plaintiffs’ petition for re-hearing and re-hearing en banc. In October 2014, the United States Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ request to review the order compelling arbitration. Subsequently, approximately 575 crew members submitted demands for arbitration. The demands make substantially the same allegations as in the federal court complaint and are similarly seeking damages, wage penalties and interest in an indeterminate amount. Unlike the federal court complaint, the demands for arbitration are being brought individually by each of the crew members and not on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants. At this time, we are unable to estimate the possible impact of this matter on us. However, we believe the underlying claims made against us are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them.

In April 2015, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation issued Notices of Violation to Royal Caribbean International and Celebrity Cruises seeking monetary penalties for alleged violations of the Alaska Marine Visible Emission Standards that occurred over the past five years on certain of our vessels. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the allegations and we are cooperating with the state of Alaska. We do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

We are routinely involved in other claims typical within the cruise vacation industry. The majority of these claims are covered by insurance. We believe the outcome of such claims, net of expected insurance recoveries, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The risk factors that affect our business and financial results are discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K and there has been no material change to these risk factors since previously disclosed. We wish to caution the reader that the risk factors discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and those described elsewhere in this report or other SEC filings, could cause future results to differ materially from those stated in any forward-looking statements.

42

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Certification of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934*
32.1	Certifications of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

*	Filed herewith
**	Furnished herewith

Interactive Data File

101 The following financial statements from Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the SEC on October 23, 2015, formatted in XBRL, as follows:

(i)the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and 2014;

(ii)the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014;

(iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014;

(iv)the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014; and

(v)the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in summary and detail.

43

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
	(Registrant)
	/s/ JASON T. LIBERTY
	Jason T. Liberty
	Chief Financial Officer
October 23, 2015	(Principal Financial Officer and duly authorized signatory)

44

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Richard D. Fain, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 23, 2015
	/s/	RICHARD D. FAIN
		Richard D. Fain
		Chairman and
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

1

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jason T. Liberty, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 23, 2015
	/s/	JASON T. LIBERTY
		Jason T. Liberty
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

1

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015 as filed by Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Richard D. Fain, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jason T. Liberty, Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.

Date: October 23, 2015
	By:	/s/	RICHARD D. FAIN
			Richard D. Fain
			Chairman and
			Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)
	By:	/s/	JASON T. LIBERTY
			Jason T. Liberty
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer)

1

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Fuel Price Risk (Details) - Fuel Price Risk $ in Millions	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) T	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($) T
Derivative Instruments
Estimated unrealized net gains associated with cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements expected to be reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income loss | $	$ 252.0	$ 223.1
Swaps 2015
Derivative Instruments
Fuel Swap Agreements (metric tons)	197,000	806,000
Percentage of projected requirements	57.00%	58.00%
Swaps 2016
Derivative Instruments
Fuel Swap Agreements (metric tons)	930,000	802,000
Percentage of projected requirements	65.00%	55.00%
Swaps 2017
Derivative Instruments
Fuel Swap Agreements (metric tons)	854,000	525,000
Percentage of projected requirements	59.00%	35.00%
Swaps 2018
Derivative Instruments
Fuel Swap Agreements (metric tons)	583,000	226,000
Percentage of projected requirements	40.00%	15.00%
Swaps 2019
Derivative Instruments
Fuel Swap Agreements (metric tons)	153,000	0
Percentage of projected requirements	10.00%	0.00%

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Credit Features (Details) $ in Thousands		9 Months Ended
		Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) hedge	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)
Derivative Instruments
Liability Derivatives		$ 925,202	$ 767,635
Moody's, Baa3 Rating
Derivative Instruments
Credit ratings for senior debt		Baa3
Moody's, Ba1 Rating
Derivative Instruments
Credit ratings for senior debt		Ba1
Standard & Poor's, BBB- Rating | Minimum
Derivative Instruments
Credit ratings for senior debt		BBB-
Standard & Poor's, BB Rating
Derivative Instruments
Credit ratings for senior debt		BB+
Interest rate contracts
Derivative Instruments
Number of derivative instruments | hedge		7
Designated as Hedging Instrument
Derivative Instruments
Liability Derivatives	[1]	$ 903,052	767,635
Other long-term Liabilities | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Interest rate swaps
Derivative Instruments
Liability Derivatives	[1]	$ 93,807	$ 65,768
Derivative Maturity More than Five Years | Minimum
Derivative Instruments
Maturity of interest rate instrument		5 years

[1] Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

XML

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income - Reclassifications (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$ (66,819)	$ (60,100)	$ (213,598)	$ (193,931)
Depreciation and amortization expenses	(210,742)	(192,448)	(617,678)	(579,063)
Other income	29,218	39,214	166,000	168,137
Fuel	(199,848)	(230,818)	(607,689)	(718,081)
Net income	228,787	490,248	458,984	654,378
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Net income	(78,164)	(6,221)	(204,332)	(19,526)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges: | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Net income	(77,810)	(5,790)	(202,978)	(16,236)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges: | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income | Cross currency swaps
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	0	0	0	(261)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges: | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income | Interest rate swaps
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(10,276)	(3,106)	(27,024)	(9,312)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges: | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income | Foreign currency forward contracts
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	0	0	0	(57)
Depreciation and amortization expenses	(752)	(450)	(2,153)	(1,348)
Other income	(239)	(238)	(715)	(4,052)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges: | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income | Foreign currency collar options
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Depreciation and amortization expenses	(568)	0	(1,003)	0
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges: | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income | Fuel swaps
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Fuel	(65,975)	(1,996)	(172,083)	(1,206)
Amortization of defined benefit plans: | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Actuarial loss	(354)	(222)	(1,061)	(666)
Prior service costs	0	(209)	(293)	(627)
Net income	(354)	(431)	(1,354)	(1,293)
Accumulated Translation Adjustment | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
Other income	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ (1,997)

XML

Earnings Per Share (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Net income for basic and diluted earnings per share	$ 228,787	$ 490,248	$ 458,984	$ 654,378
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (shares)	219,963	222,523	219,835	222,007
Dilutive effect of stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock awards (shares)	1,174	1,336	1,144	1,344
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding (shares)	221,137	223,859	220,979	223,351
Basic earnings per share (in dollars per share)	$ 1.04	$ 2.20	$ 2.09	$ 2.95
Diluted earnings per share (in dollars per share)	$ 1.03	$ 2.19	$ 2.08	$ 2.93

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Income Statement Hedging Instruments (Details) - Fair Value Hedging - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	$ 25,134	$ 53	$ 30,420	$ 33,630
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item	(16,284)	7,902	(6,470)	(5,687)
Interest rate swaps | Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	2,793	3,063	8,640	9,199
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item	3,968	3,968	11,775	13,435
Interest rate swaps | Other income (expense)
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	22,341	(3,010)	21,780	24,431
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item	$ (20,252)	$ 3,934	$ (18,245)	$ (19,122)

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Non-Derivative Instruments (Details)	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 EUR (€)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2014 EUR (€)	Sep. 30, 2015 EUR (€)
Derivative Instruments
Fair Value, Concentration of Risk, Derivative Instruments, Assets	$ 700,000
Derivative instrument, observation period	3 years	3 years
Percentage of debt bearing fixed interest	33.00%		28.50%		33.00%
Interest rate swaps
Derivative Instruments
Notional amount	$ 4,400,000,000		$ 2,900,000,000
Interest rate swaps | Fair Value Hedging | Oasis of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Derivative Instruments
Unsecured term loan	420,000,000.0		420,000,000
Debt amount	$ 227,500,000
Interest rate on hedged debt (as a percent)	5.41%				5.41%
Interest rate swaps | Fair Value Hedging | 5.25% Fixed rate debt
Derivative Instruments
Unsecured term loan	$ 650,000,000.0		650,000,000
Interest rate on hedged debt (as a percent)	5.25%				5.25%
Interest rate swaps | Cash flow hedge | Harmony of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Derivative Instruments
Anticipated loan balance	$ 774,200,000.0				€ 693,400,000.0
Fixed rate on converted debt	2.26%				2.26%
Interest rate swaps | Cash flow hedge | Ovation of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Derivative Instruments
Anticipated loan balance	$ 830,000,000.0
Additional interest above LIBOR rate	1.00%	1.00%
Fixed rate on converted debt	3.16%				3.16%
Interest rate swaps | Cash flow hedge | Celebrity Reflection floating rate debt
Derivative Instruments
Unsecured term loan			$ 518,100,000.0
Additional interest above LIBOR rate	0.40%	0.40%	0.40%	0.40%
Fixed rate on converted debt	2.85%		2.85%		2.85%
Unsecured term loan, maximum borrowing commitment per ship	$ 518,100,000
Interest rate swaps | Cash flow hedge | Quantum of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Derivative Instruments
Unsecured term loan			$ 704,400,000.0
Additional interest above LIBOR rate	1.30%	1.30%	1.30%	1.30%
Fixed rate on converted debt	3.74%		3.74%		3.74%
Unsecured term loan, maximum borrowing commitment per ship	$ 704,400,000
Interest rate swaps | Cash flow hedge | Anthem of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Derivative Instruments
Additional interest above LIBOR rate	1.30%	1.30%
Fixed rate on converted debt	3.86%				3.86%
Unsecured term loan, maximum borrowing commitment per ship	$ 725,000,000
Foreign exchange contracts
Derivative Instruments
Notional amount	2,500,000,000		$ 3,000,000,000
Pullmantur and TUI Cruises | Net Investment Hedging
Derivative Instruments
Debt amount	207,585,000		168,718,000
Carrying value of non-derivative instrument designated as hedging instrument	$ 207,600,000	€ 185,900,000	$ 168,700,000	€ 139,400,000
LIBOR | Anthem of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Derivative Instruments
Additional interest above LIBOR rate	1.30%	1.30%
LIBOR | Interest rate swaps | Fair Value Hedging | Oasis of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Derivative Instruments
Additional interest above LIBOR rate (as a percent)	3.87%				3.87%
Derivative, Variable rate of interest (as a percent)	4.28%				4.28%
LIBOR | Interest rate swaps | Fair Value Hedging | 5.25% Fixed rate debt
Derivative Instruments
Additional interest above LIBOR rate (as a percent)	3.63%				3.63%
Derivative, Variable rate of interest (as a percent)	3.95%				3.95%
EURIBOR | Interest rate swaps | Cash flow hedge | Harmony of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Derivative Instruments
Additional interest above LIBOR rate	1.15%	1.15%

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Pullmantur Goodwill, Intangible Assets, and Long-lived Assets (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
		Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014
Asset Impairment Charges [Abstract]
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels, Total Impairment				$ 113,200
Total, Total Impairment		$ 411,267	$ 0	411,267	$ 0
Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring | Level 3
Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
Total Assets		0		0		$ 0
Total Carrying Amount | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring
Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
Total Assets		147,419		147,419		189,241
Total Fair Value | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring
Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
Total Assets		147,419		147,419		$ 189,241
Pullmantur
Asset Impairment Charges [Abstract]
Pullmantur Goodwill, Total Impairment	[1]			123,814
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names, Total Impairment	[2]			174,285
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels, Total Impairment	[3]			113,168
Total, Total Impairment				$ 411,267
Pullmantur | Goodwill
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]
Discount rate				11.00%
Pullmantur | Intangible Assets
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]
Discount rate				11.50%
Pullmantur | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring | Level 3
Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
Pullmantur Goodwill	[1]	0		$ 0
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names	[2]	0		0
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels	[3]	147,900		147,900
Total Assets		147,900		147,900
Pullmantur | Total Carrying Amount | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring
Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
Pullmantur Goodwill	[1]	0		0
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names	[2]	0		0
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels	[3]	147,900		147,900
Total Assets		147,900		147,900
Pullmantur | Total Fair Value | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring
Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
Pullmantur Goodwill	[1]	0		0
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names	[2]	0		0
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels	[3]	147,900		147,900
Total Assets		$ 147,900		$ 147,900

[1] We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions was the decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur's fleet. The discounted cash flow model used our 2016 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years’ cash flows through 2020 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur’s reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur’s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 11%. (2) We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asse

[2] We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asset using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. These trademarks and trade names relate to Pullmantur and we have used a discount rate of 11.5%, comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit.

[3] We estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using the market approach for the aircraft and a blended indication from the cost and market approaches for the vessels. A significant input in performing the fair value assessments for these assets was comparable market transactions.

XML

Earnings Per Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share

Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Net income for basic and diluted earnings per share	$	228,787	$	490,248	$	458,984	$	654,378
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	219,963		222,523		219,835		222,007
Dilutive effect of stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock awards	1,174		1,336		1,144		1,344
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding	221,137		223,859		220,979		223,351
Basic earnings per share	$	1.04	$	2.20	$	2.09	$	2.95
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.03	$	2.19	$	2.08	$	2.93

There were no antidilutive shares for thequarters and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015and September 30, 2014, respectively.

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Designated Cash Flow Hedges (Details) - Cash flow hedge - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion)	$ (300,302)	$ (255,416)	$ (483,946)	$ (339,415)
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Effective Portion)	(77,810)	(5,790)	(202,978)	(16,236)
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Ineffective Portion)	(2,970)	(8,037)	(3,166)	(7,697)
Cross currency swaps | Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Effective Portion)	0	0	0	(261)
Interest rate swaps | Other income (expense)
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Ineffective Portion)	(617)	17	(395)	(78)
Interest rate swaps | Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion)	(68,956)	1,331	(75,104)	(71,621)
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Effective Portion)	(10,276)	(3,106)	(27,024)	(9,312)
Foreign currency forward contracts | Other income (expense)
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Effective Portion)	(239)	(238)	(715)	(4,052)
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Ineffective Portion)	0	15	0	(12)
Foreign currency forward contracts | Depreciation and amortization expenses
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion)	(619)	(163,387)	(131,211)	(172,629)
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Effective Portion)	(752)	(450)	(2,153)	(1,348)
Foreign currency forward contracts | Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Effective Portion)	0	0	0	(57)
Foreign currency collar options | Depreciation and amortization expenses
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion)	34	(21,904)	(64,559)	(30,638)
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Effective Portion)	(568)	0	(1,003)	0
Fuel swaps | Swaps | Other income (expense)
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Ineffective Portion)	(2,353)	(8,069)	(2,771)	(7,607)
Fuel swaps | Swaps | Fuel cost
Effect of derivative instruments involved in hedging on the consolidated financial statements
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion)	(230,761)	(71,456)	(213,072)	(64,527)
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income (Effective Portion)	$ (65,975)	$ (1,996)	$ (172,083)	$ (1,206)

XML

Commitments and Contingencies - Debt (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Change of control provisions in debt covenants
Number of months considered to determine requirement of prepayment of debts	24 months
Line of Credit | Minimum
Change of control provisions in debt covenants
Debt instrument covenant, minimum percentage of ownership by a person	33.00%
Debt Securities | Minimum
Change of control provisions in debt covenants
Debt instrument covenant, minimum percentage of ownership by a person	50.00%

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) € in Millions, $ in Millions	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 23, 2015 ship berth	Jun. 30, 2015 berth	Dec. 31, 2014 crew_member	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 EUR (€)
Commitments and Contingencies
Percentage of aggregate cost exposed to fluctuations in the euro exchange rate			28.80%	43.70%	43.70%
Cruise ships on order
Commitments and Contingencies
Aggregate cost of ships on order, not including TUI cruises and Project Edge ships on order				$ 5,000.0
Deposit for the purchase of ships expected to enter service				449.8
Unsecured term loan maturing 12 years after ship delivery | Oasis class fourth ship
Commitments and Contingencies
Anticipated loan balance				$ 1,000.0	€ 931.2
Oasis Class Ship Term Loans | Oasis class fourth ship
Commitments and Contingencies
Long term debt, term				12 years
Long term debt, interest rate				3.82%	3.82%
Quantum of the Seas Term Loan | Quantum Class Ship
Commitments and Contingencies
Percentage of bank committed financing		80.00%
Guarantee Percent		95.00%
LIBOR | Oasis Class Ship Term Loans | Oasis class fourth ship
Commitments and Contingencies
Margin on floating rate base				1.10%
Royal Caribbean International Cruise Ships | Quantum Class Ship
Commitments and Contingencies
Approximate Berths | berth		4,150
Class Action Complaint
Commitments and Contingencies
Number of crew members submitting demands for arbitration (in excess) | crew_member			575
Subsequent Event [Member] | Project Edge Class Ship Term Loans | Project Edge Class Ship
Commitments and Contingencies
Percentage of bank committed financing	80.00%
Guarantee Percent	100.00%
Subsequent Event [Member] | Celebrity Cruise Ships | Project Edge Class Ship
Commitments and Contingencies
Number of ships on order | ship	2
Approximate Berths | berth	2,900

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Non-Derivative Net Investment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Foreign currency debt
Net investment hedge
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)	$ (436)	$ 13,408	$ 8,955	$ 18,038

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Details) - $ / shares	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Shareholders' Equity
Dividend declared (in dollars per share)		$ 0.375	$ 0.30	$ 0.30	$ 0.30	$ 0.30	$ 0.25	$ 0.25	$ 0.25
Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Cash Paid			$ 0.30	0.30			$ 0.25	0.25
Common Stock, Dividend Declared Prior Quarter Paid Current Quarter				$ 0.30	$ 0.30			$ 0.25
Subsequent Event [Member]
Shareholders' Equity
Common Stock, Dividend Declared Prior Quarter Paid Current Quarter	$ 0.375

XML

Shareholders' Equity - Stock Repurchase (Details) - Subsequent Event [Member] - October 2015 Stock Repurchase Program [Member] $ in Millions	Oct. 23, 2015 USD ($)
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Stock Repurchase Program, Authorized Amount	$ 500
Accelerated stock repurchase agreement October 23, 2015
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Stock Repurchase Program, Authorized Amount	$ 200

XML

Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure

Note 3. Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets

Pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the Spanish and Latin American markets. These markets have experienced significant volatility and the brand has adopted various changes to its operating strategy as a result. Most recently, in response to favorable economic expectations in Latin America, especially Brazil, management undertook a positioning of the brand to increase sourcing of guests and to deliver deployment for Latin American consumers; transferring newer and more efficient capacity to the brand; and selling Pullmantur’s non-cruise businesses to allow the brand to focus on the core cruise business.

However, the Latin American resurgence was short lived and the core Latin American economies, including Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Venezuela, have regressed and their currencies have materially depreciated versus the US dollar.  During the second quarter of 2015, as a result of the weakness in Latin America, we decided to defer the scheduled transfer of Royal Caribbean International’s Majesty of the Seas to the Pullmantur fleet. During our most recently completed quarter, the negative economic trends significantly deteriorated. Most notably, the Brazilian Real devalued by approximately 22% relative to the US dollar during the third quarter of 2015.

In light of the increased challenges facing Pullmantur’s Latin American strategy, we recently made a decision to significantly change that strategy from growing the brand through vessel transfers to a right-sizing strategy. This right-sizing strategy includes reducing our exposure to Latin America, refocusing on the brand’s core market of Spain and, consequently, reducing the size of Pullmantur’s fleet. This strategic change includes a decision to redeploy Pullmantur’s Empress to the Royal Caribbean International brand as well as a decision to cancel the intended transfer of the Majesty of the Seas to Pullmantur. As we previously disclosed, the planned growth of the Pullmantur fleet through the transfer of vessels into the brand has been the most significant assumption within Pullmantur's projected cash flows supporting the recoverability of the Pullmantur reporting unit’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names. Our decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur’s fleet significantly decreases the cash flow projections which have been the basis of our impairment analysis.

As a result of these developments, we performed an interim impairment evaluation of Pullmantur’s goodwill and trademarks and trade names in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The estimation of future cash flows requires our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues, operating costs, marketing, selling and administrative expenses, interest rates, ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry’s competitive environment and general and economic business conditions, among other factors.

Due to the previously described market conditions and our recent decision to reduce our exposure to Latin America, refocus on the brand’s core Spanish market and reduce the brand's overall capacity, we reviewed the two-step goodwill impairment test based on the updated cash flow projections. As a result of this analysis, we determined that the carrying value of the Pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its fair value. Similarly, we determined that the carrying value of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names exceeded their fair value as well. Accordingly, upon the completion of the two-step impairment test, we recognized an impairment charge of $123.8 million and $174.3 million for goodwill and trademark and trade names, respectively, during the quarter ended September 30, 2015. These charges reflect the full carrying amounts of the goodwill and trademark and trade names leaving Pullmantur with no intangible assets on its books.

Additionally, in conjunction with performing the two-step goodwill impairment test, we identified that the estimated fair value of certain long-lived assets, consisting of two ships and three aircraft were less than their carrying values. As a result of this determination, we evaluated these assets pursuant to our long-lived asset impairment test. The decision to significantly reduce our exposure to the Latin American market negatively impacted the expected undiscounted cash flows of these vessels and aircraft and resulted in an impairment charge of $113.2 million to write down these assets to their estimated fair values during the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The remaining assets for the Pullmantur reporting unit have fair values greater than or equal to their carrying amounts.

The carrying amounts of goodwill and intangible assets attributable to our Pullmantur reporting unit were as follows (in thousands):

	Goodwill			Intangibles
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	133,583		$	188,037
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	(123,814		)	(174,285		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(9,769		)	(13,752		)
Balance at September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—

Intangible assets are reported within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.

Pullmantur had recognized a deferred tax liability of $43.4 million, which represented the tax effect of the basis difference between the tax and book values of Pullmantur’s trademarks and trade names. In addition, Pullmantur had recognized a net deferred tax asset relating to net operating losses with an unlimited carryforward period. The benefit of the deferred tax asset was previously assumed through the future realization of the deferred tax liability. A partial valuation allowance was previously established against the deferred tax asset since the utilization of the net operating losses is subject to a 70% annual limitation. As a result of the impairment of the trademarks and trade names, we reversed the deferred tax liability of $43.4 million and increased the valuation allowance by $31.4 million, or to 100% of the deferred tax asset balance, resulting in a $12.0 million deferred tax benefit recognized during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

The combined impairment charge of $411.3 million related to Pullmantur’s goodwill, trademarks and trade names, vessels and aircraft was reported within Impairment of Pullmantur related assets and the net $12.0 million deferred tax benefit was reported within Other income (expense) in our statement of comprehensive income (loss), resulting in a net impairment loss of $399.3 million.

XML

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income at beginning of the year			$ (896,994)	$ 5,671
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications			(503,727)	(366,086)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income			204,332	19,526
Total other comprehensive loss	$ (223,365)	$ (269,559)	(299,395)	(346,560)
Ending balance	(1,196,389)	(340,889)	(1,196,389)	(340,889)
Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income at beginning of the year			(826,026)	43,324
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications			(483,946)	(339,415)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income			202,978	16,236
Total other comprehensive loss			(280,968)	(323,179)
Ending balance	(1,106,994)	(279,855)	(1,106,994)	(279,855)
Changes in defined benefit plans
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income at beginning of the year			(31,207)	(23,994)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications			4,213	(6,829)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income			1,354	1,293
Total other comprehensive loss			5,567	(5,536)
Ending balance	(25,640)	(29,530)	(25,640)	(29,530)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income at beginning of the year			(39,761)	(13,659)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications			(23,994)	(19,842)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income			0	1,997
Total other comprehensive loss			(23,994)	(17,845)
Ending balance	$ (63,755)	$ (31,504)	$ (63,755)	$ (31,504)

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Balance Sheet (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives		$ 113,279	$ 63,981
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives		925,202	767,635
Designated as Hedging Instrument
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives	[1]	109,359	63,981
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives	[1]	903,052	767,635
Designated as Hedging Instrument | Foreign currency collar options | Other assets
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives	[1]	0	0
Designated as Hedging Instrument | Foreign currency collar options | Derivative financial instruments
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives	[1]	0	21,855
Not Designated as Hedging Instrument
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives		3,920	0
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives		22,150	0
Interest rate swaps | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Other assets
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives	[1]	1,691	0
Interest rate swaps | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Other long-term Liabilities
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives	[1]	93,807	65,768
Foreign currency forward contracts | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Other assets
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives	[1]	0	63,981
Foreign currency forward contracts | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Derivative financial instruments
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives	[1]	107,668	0
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives	[1]	292,372	17,619
Foreign currency forward contracts | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Other long-term Liabilities
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives	[1]	0	164,627
Fuel swaps | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Swaps | Other assets
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives	[1]	0	0
Fuel swaps | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Swaps | Derivative financial instruments
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives	[1]	0	0
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives	[1]	239,715	227,512
Fuel swaps | Designated as Hedging Instrument | Swaps | Other long-term Liabilities
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives	[1]	277,158	270,254
Fuel swaps | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument | Swaps | Other assets
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives		841	0
Fuel swaps | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument | Swaps | Derivative financial instruments
Asset Derivatives
Asset Derivatives		3,079	0
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives		17,437	0
Fuel swaps | Not Designated as Hedging Instrument | Swaps | Other long-term Liabilities
Liability Derivatives
Liability Derivatives		$ 4,713	$ 0

[1] Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Income Statement [Abstract]
Passenger ticket revenues	$ 1,873,942	$ 1,786,746	$ 4,688,189	$ 4,590,048
Onboard and other revenues	649,158	602,016	1,708,832	1,665,981
Total revenues	2,523,100	2,388,762	6,397,021	6,256,029
Cruise operating expenses:
Commissions, transportation and other	413,156	396,916	1,093,409	1,068,961
Onboard and other	175,214	182,658	438,558	456,296
Payroll and related	217,627	214,260	647,788	634,232
Food	122,124	120,908	361,317	358,172
Fuel	199,848	230,818	607,689	718,081
Other operating	259,057	281,322	777,291	825,794
Total cruise operating expenses	1,387,026	1,426,882	3,926,052	4,061,536
Marketing, selling and administrative expenses	256,060	239,662	817,040	790,957
Depreciation and amortization expenses	210,742	192,448	617,678	579,063
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267	0	411,267	0
Restructuring charges	0	308	0	1,958
Operating Income	258,005	529,462	624,984	822,515
Other income (expense):
Interest income	1,735	2,117	8,244	8,023
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(66,819)	(60,100)	(213,598)	(193,931)
Other income (including in 2015 a net deferred tax benefit of $12.0 million related to the Pullmantur impairment)	35,866	18,769	39,354	17,771
Total other income (expense)	(29,218)	(39,214)	(166,000)	(168,137)
Net Income	$ 228,787	$ 490,248	$ 458,984	$ 654,378
Earnings per Share:
Basic (in dollars per share)	$ 1.04	$ 2.20	$ 2.09	$ 2.95
Diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 1.03	$ 2.19	$ 2.08	$ 2.93
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:
Basic (in shares)	219,963	222,523	219,835	222,007
Diluted (in shares)	221,137	223,859	220,979	223,351
Comprehensive Income
Net Income	$ 228,787	$ 490,248	$ 458,984	$ 654,378
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(4,191)	(18,482)	(23,994)	(17,845)
Change in defined benefit plans	3,318	(1,451)	5,567	(5,536)
Loss on cash flow derivative hedges	(222,492)	(249,626)	(280,968)	(323,179)
Total other comprehensive loss	(223,365)	(269,559)	(299,395)	(346,560)
Comprehensive Income	$ 5,422	$ 220,689	$ 159,589	$ 307,818

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Derivative Instruments
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives			$ (49,607)	$ (24,234)
Other income (expense)
Derivative Instruments
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	$ (32,781)	$ (35,395)	(49,798)	(25,562)
Foreign exchange contracts | Other income (expense)
Derivative Instruments
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	(32,705)	(35,175)	(49,607)	(24,405)
Fuel swaps | Fuel swaps | Other income (expense)
Derivative Instruments
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	$ (76)	$ (220)	$ (191)	$ (1,157)

XML

General

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

General

General

Description of Business

We are a global cruise company.  We own Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises, Pullmantur, Azamara Club Cruises, CDF Croisières de France and a 50% joint venture interest in TUI Cruises.

Basis for Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Estimates are required for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with these principles. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. We consolidate entities over which we have control, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest of greater than 50%, and variable interest entities where we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Refer to Note 5. Other Assets for further information regarding our variable interest entities. For affiliates we do not control but over which we have significant influence on financial and operating policies, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest from 20% to 50%, the investment is accounted for using the equity method. We consolidate the operating results of Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France on a two-month lag to allow for more timely preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Except for the impairment of Pullmantur related assets, as described in Note 3. Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets, no material events or transactions affecting Pullmantur or CDF Croisières de France have occurred during the two-month lag period of August and September 2015 that would require further disclosure or adjustment to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

We believe the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation. Our revenues are seasonal and results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Recurring (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments		$ 712	$ 0
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments		812,635	703,654
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring | Level 1
Assets:
Investments	[1],[2]	3,884	5,531
Total Assets	[2]	3,884	5,531
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring | Level 2
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments	[3],[4]	113,279	63,981
Total Assets	[4]	113,279	63,981
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments	[4],[5]	925,202	767,635
Total Liabilities	[4]	925,202	767,635
Total | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments	[3]	113,279	63,981
Investments	[1]	3,884	5,531
Total Assets		117,163	69,512
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments	[5]	925,202	767,635
Total Liabilities		$ 925,202	$ 767,635

[1] Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds.

[2] Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

[3] Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

[4] Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity, as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options’ contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.

[5] Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency collar options, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Significant Accounting Policies
Gross amount of port costs included in passenger ticket revenues		$ 156.8	$ 155.0	$ 425.6	$ 416.8
Balance sheet reclass from Property, plant and equipment to Other assets
Significant Accounting Policies
Prior Period Reclassification Adjustment	$ 41.9
Cash flows reclass from Other, net to Net deferred income tax (benefit) expense
Significant Accounting Policies
Prior Period Reclassification Adjustment					$ 1.2

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Offsetting of Derivative Instruments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Offsetting of Financial Assets under Master Netting Agreements [Abstract]
Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet	$ 113,279	$ 63,981
Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities	(112,567)	(63,981)
Net Amount of Derivative Assets	712	0
Offsetting of Financial Liabilities under Master Netting Agreements [Abstract]
Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet	(925,202)	(767,635)
Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets	112,567	63,981
Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities	$ (812,635)	$ (703,654)

XML

Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets - Narrative (Details) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
		Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) ship aircraft	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) ship aircraft	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)
Goodwill [Line Items]
Deferred Tax Liabilities, Intangible Assets		$ 43,400		$ 43,400
Annual percentage limitation of taxable income for NOL carryforward				70.00%
Long-lived assets—Impairment of Pullmantur aircraft and vessels				$ 113,200
Valuation Allowance, Deferred Tax Asset, Increase (Decrease), Amount				$ 31,400
Percentage Of Valuation Allowance Required As Per Projections				100.00%
Deferred Income Tax Expense (Benefit)				$ 12,000
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets		$ 411,267	$ 0	411,267	$ 0
Asset Impairment Charges, Net of Tax				399,300
Pullmantur
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill, Impairment Loss	[1]			123,814
Impairment of Intangible Assets (Excluding Goodwill)				$ 174,285
Number of Ships Impaired | ship		2		2
Number of Aircrafts Impaired | aircraft		3		3
Long-lived assets—Impairment of Pullmantur aircraft and vessels	[2]			$ 113,168
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets				$ 411,267
Brazil, Brazil Real
Goodwill [Line Items]
Currency Devaluation		22.00%

[1] We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions was the decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur's fleet. The discounted cash flow model used our 2016 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years’ cash flows through 2020 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur’s reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur’s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 11%. (2) We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asse

[2] We estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using the market approach for the aircraft and a blended indication from the cost and market approaches for the vessels. A significant input in performing the fair value assessments for these assets was comparable market transactions.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenues and Expenses

We recognize passenger ticket revenues, revenues from onboard and other goods and services and all associated cruise operating costs for all of our uncompleted voyages on a pro-rata basis. Prior to September 30, 2014, we recognized revenues and cruise operating costs for our shorter voyages (voyages of ten days or less) upon voyage completion while we recognized revenues and cruise operating costs for voyages in excess of ten days on a pro-rata basis.

The change to prorate all voyages as of September 30, 2014 forward was not retrospectively applied to prior periods, as the impact of prorating all voyages was immaterial to the respective periods presented.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the principles used to recognize revenue for all entities. The guidance is based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not comprehensively addressed in the prior accounting guidance. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods. In August 2015, the effective date of this guidance was deferred by one year and will now be effective for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of this newly issued guidance to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, GAAP guidance was issued requiring management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and provide related disclosures. This guidance will be effective for our annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2016 and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued changing the requirements for reporting extraordinary and unusual items in the income statement. The update eliminates the concept of extraordinary items. The presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued affecting current consolidation guidance. The guidance changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods and will be effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs. The guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by these amendments. Additionally, in August 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the presentation of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. The amendments continue to allow an entity to present debt issuance costs as an asset with subsequent amortization over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. This guidance should be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements, with the exception of reclassifying debt issuance costs from Other assets to be reflected as a reduction of our current and long-term liabilities.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to provide a practical expedient for the measurement date of an employer's defined benefit obligation and plan assets. The guidance provides a practical expedient for entities with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end and for contributions or significant events that occur between the month-end date and an entity's fiscal year end. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify a customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The amendments provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license or if the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. This guidance will impact the accounting of software licenses but will not change a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The guidance will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments either prospectively or retrospectively. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the measurement of inventory for all entities. The amendments apply to all inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out or average cost. The guidance requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The guidance must be applied prospectively and will be effective for our interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the accounting for measurement-period adjustments related to business combinations. The amendments require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined and eliminates the requirement to retroactively adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Other

Revenues and expenses include port costs that vary with guest head counts. The amounts of such port costs included in Passenger ticket revenues on a gross basis were $156.8 million and $155.0 million for the third quarters of 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $425.6 million and $416.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Reclassifications

On January 1, 2015, we adopted ASC 853, Service Concession Arrangements ("ASC 853"), using the modified retrospective approach. Due to the adoption of ASC 853, $41.9 million has been reclassified in the consolidated balance sheet, as of December 31, 2014, from Property and equipment, net to Other assets in order to conform to the current year presentation. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended September 30,2014, $1.2 million has been reclassified in the consolidated statements of cash flows from Other, net to Net deferred income tax (benefit) expense within Net cash provided by operating activities in order to conform to the current year presentation.

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 147,419	$ 189,241
Trade and other receivables, net	241,638	261,392
Inventories	131,108	123,490
Prepaid expenses and other assets	269,914	226,960
Derivative financial instruments	110,747	0
Total current assets	900,826	801,083
Property and equipment, net	18,776,782	18,193,627
Goodwill	286,707	420,542
Other assets	994,533	1,297,938
Total assets	20,958,848	20,713,190
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	905,128	799,630
Accounts payable	305,747	331,505
Accrued interest	83,281	49,074
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	630,455	635,138
Derivative financial instruments	549,524	266,986
Customer deposits	1,886,356	1,766,914
Total current liabilities	4,360,491	3,849,247
Long-term debt	7,584,808	7,644,318
Other long-term liabilities	$ 757,763	$ 935,266
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding)	$ 0	$ 0
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 233,796,056 and 233,106,019 shares issued, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively)	2,338	2,331
Paid-in capital	3,279,806	3,253,552
Retained earnings	6,819,809	6,575,248
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,196,389)	(896,994)
Treasury stock (13,808,683 common shares at cost, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014)	(649,778)	(649,778)
Total shareholders’ equity	8,255,786	8,284,359
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$ 20,958,848	$ 20,713,190

XML

Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Intangible Assets and Goodwill [Table Text Block]

The carrying amounts of goodwill and intangible assets attributable to our Pullmantur reporting unit were as follows (in thousands):

	Goodwill			Intangibles
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	133,583		$	188,037
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	(123,814		)	(174,285		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(9,769		)	(13,752		)
Balance at September 30, 2015	$	—		$	—

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Oct. 16, 2015
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD
Entity Central Index Key	0000884887
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2015
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		219,995,391
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2015
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3

XML

Earnings Per Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Reconciliation Between Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

A reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Quarter Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Net income for basic and diluted earnings per share	$	228,787	$	490,248	$	458,984	$	654,378
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	219,963		222,523		219,835		222,007
Dilutive effect of stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock awards	1,174		1,336		1,144		1,344
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding	221,137		223,859		220,979		223,351
Basic earnings per share	$	1.04	$	2.20	$	2.09	$	2.95
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.03	$	2.19	$	2.08	$	2.93

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	20,000,000	20,000,000
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	500,000,000	500,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	233,796,056	233,106,019
Treasury stock, common shares	13,808,683	13,808,683

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

In January 2015, we entered into a financing arrangement for the US dollar financing of the fourth Oasis-class ship. Through the financing arrangement, we have the right, but not the obligation, to satisfy the obligations to be incurred upon delivery and acceptance of the vessel under the shipbuilding contract by assuming, at delivery and acceptance, the debt indirectly incurred by the shipbuilder during the construction of the ship. The amount assumed under this arrangement is not to exceed the US dollar equivalent of €931.2 million, or approximately $1.0 billion, based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015. The loan, if we were to elect assumption at the date of actual delivery, will amortize semi-annually and will mature 12 years following delivery of the ship. At our election, interest on the loan will accrue either (1) at a fixed rate of 3.82% (inclusive of the applicable margin) or (2) at a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.10%.

In June 2015, we entered into an agreement with Meyer Werft to build the fourth Quantum-class ship for Royal Caribbean International. We have also received a commitment for the unsecured financing of up to 80% of the ship’s contract price. Hermes has agreed to guarantee to the lenders payment of 95% of the financing. The ship will have a capacity of approximately 4,150 berths and is expected to enter service in the second quarter of 2019.

In October 2015, our conditional agreements with STX France to build two ships of a new generation of Celebrity Cruises ships, known as "Project Edge" became effective. We received commitments for the unsecured financing of the ships for up to 80% of the ship’s contract price through a facility to be guaranteed 100% by COFACE. The ships will each have a capacity of approximately 2,900 berths and are expected to enter service in the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first half of 2020, respectively.

As of September 30, 2015, the aggregate cost of our ships on order, not including the "Project Edge" ships and the TUI Cruises' ships on order, was approximately $5.0 billion, of which we had deposited $449.8 million as of such date. Approximately 43.7% of the aggregate cost was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2015. Refer to Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for further information.

Litigation

As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, a class action complaint was filed in June 2011 against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants employed onboard Royal Caribbean International cruise vessels. The complaint alleged that the stateroom attendants were required to pay other crew members to help with their duties and that certain stateroom attendants were required to work back of house assignments without the ability to earn gratuities, in each case in violation of the U.S. Seaman’s Wage Act. In May 2012, the district court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis that the applicable collective bargaining agreement requires any such claims to be arbitrated. The United States Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, affirmed the district court’s dismissal and denied the plaintiffs’ petition for re-hearing and re-hearing en banc. In October 2014, the United States Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ request to review the order compelling arbitration. Subsequently, approximately 575 crew members submitted demands for arbitration. The demands make substantially the same allegations as in the federal court complaint and are similarly seeking damages, wage penalties and interest in an indeterminate amount. Unlike the federal court complaint, the demands for arbitration are being brought individually by each of the crew members and not on behalf of a purported class of stateroom attendants. At this time, we are unable to estimate the possible impact of this matter on us. However, we believe the underlying claims made against us are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against them.

In April 2015, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation issued Notices of Violation to Royal Caribbean International and Celebrity Cruises seeking monetary penalties for alleged violations of the Alaska Marine Visible Emission Standards that occurred over the past five years on certain of our vessels. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the allegations and we are cooperating with the state of Alaska. We do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

We are routinely involved in other claims typical within the cruise vacation industry. The majority of these claims are covered by insurance. We believe the outcome of such claims, net of expected insurance recoveries, will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

Other

If (i) any person other than A. Wilhelmsen AS. and Cruise Associates and their respective affiliates (the “Applicable Group”) acquires ownership of more than 33% of our common stock and the Applicable Group owns less of our common stock than such person, or (ii) subject to certain exceptions, during any 24-month period, a majority of the Board is no longer comprised of individuals who were members of the Board on the first day of such period, we may be obligated to prepay indebtedness outstanding under our ship financing facilities, which we may be unable to replace on similar terms. Our other debt agreements also contain change of control provisions that would be triggered by the acquisition of greater than 50% of our common stock by (i) any person or (ii) in the case of our public debt securities, by a person other than a member of the Applicable Group coupled with a ratings downgrade. If this were to occur, it would have an adverse impact on our liquidity and operations.

XML

Long-Term Debt

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Long-Term Debt

Long-Term Debt

In April 2015, we took delivery of Anthem of the Seas. To finance the purchase, we borrowed $742.1 million under a previously committed unsecured term loan which is 95% guaranteed by Euler Hermes Deutschland AG ("Hermes"), the official export credit agency of Germany. The loan amortizes semi-annually over 12 years and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 1.30%, totaling 1.71% as of September 30, 2015. Refer to Note 10. Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for information regarding interest rate swap agreements related to this loan.

In June 2015, we amended and restated our $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due July 2016. The amendment reduced the applicable margin and facility fee and extended the termination date to June 2020. The applicable margin and facility fee vary with our debt rating and were 1.50% and 0.25%, respectively, as of September 30, 2015. We have the right to request an increase in the capacity of the amended facility by an additional $300 million, subject to the receipt of additional or increased lender commitments, and to extend the termination date by up to two years, subject to lender consent. Additionally, in July 2015, we amended our $1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility due August 2018 to reduce pricing in line with the amended pricing of the $1.1 billion unsecured revolving credit facility. These amendments did not result in the extinguishment of debt.

In July 2015, we also amended our $380.0 million, €365.0 million, $290.0 million and $65.0 million unsecured term loans due at various dates from 2016 through 2019 to reduce the applicable margins. The margins are currently 1.75% for each loan based on our debt rating as of September 30, 2015. The termination date of the $290 million unsecured term loan was extended from February 2016 to February 2018. None of these amendments resulted in the extinguishment of debt.

In October 2015, we received increased lender commitments for our unsecured revolving credit facility due June 2020 in the amount of $300 million, bringing our total capacity under this facility to $1.4 billion.

XML

Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets (Details) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	$ 420,542
Ending balance, Goodwill	286,707
Pullmantur
Goodwill [Roll Forward]
Beginning balance, Goodwill	133,583
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets, Goodwill	(123,814)	[1]
Foreign currency translation adjustment, Goodwill	(9,769)
Ending balance, Goodwill	0
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets [Roll Forward]
Beginning balance, Intangibles	188,037
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets, Intangibles	(174,285)	[2]
Foreign currency translation adjustment, Intangibles	(13,752)
Ending balance, Intangibles	$ 0

[1] We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions was the decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur's fleet. The discounted cash flow model used our 2016 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years’ cash flows through 2020 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur’s reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur’s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 11%. (2) We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asse

[2] We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asset using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. These trademarks and trade names relate to Pullmantur and we have used a discount rate of 11.5%, comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit.

XML

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Attributable to Parent [Abstract]

Schedule of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
	Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income at beginning of the year	$	(826,026	)	$	(31,207	)	$	(39,761	)	$	(896,994	)	$	43,324		$	(23,994	)	$	(13,659	)	$	5,671
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	(483,946		)	4,213			(23,994		)	(503,727		)	(339,415		)	(6,829		)	(19,842		)	(366,086		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	202,978			1,354			—			204,332			16,236			1,293			1,997			19,526
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income	(280,968		)	5,567			(23,994		)	(299,395		)	(323,179		)	(5,536		)	(17,845		)	(346,560		)
Ending balance	$	(1,106,994	)	$	(25,640	)	$	(63,755	)	$	(1,196,389	)	$	(279,855	)	$	(29,530	)	$	(31,504	)	$	(340,889	)

Schedule of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive  Income (Loss) into Income
Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014			Affected Line Item in  Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges:
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(261	)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Interest rate swaps	(10,276		)	(3,106		)	(27,024		)	(9,312		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Foreign currency forward contracts	(752		)	(450		)	(2,153		)	(1,348		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses
Foreign currency forward contracts	(239		)	(238		)	(715		)	(4,052		)	Other income
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			(57		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Foreign currency collar options	(568		)	—			(1,003		)	—			Depreciation and amortization expenses
Fuel swaps	(65,975		)	(1,996		)	(172,083		)	(1,206		)	Fuel
	(77,810		)	(5,790		)	(202,978		)	(16,236		)
Amortization of defined benefit plans:
Actuarial loss	(354		)	(222		)	(1,061		)	(666		)	Payroll and related
Prior service costs	—			(209		)	(293		)	(627		)	Payroll and related
	(354		)	(431		)	(1,354		)	(1,293		)
Release of foreign cumulative translation due to sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses:
Foreign cumulative translation	—			—			—			(1,997		)	Other operating
Total reclassifications for the period	$	(78,164	)	$	(6,221	)	$	(204,332	)	$	(19,526	)

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using										Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents(4)	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	—	$	—	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—
Total Assets	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	—	$	—	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)(5)	$	8,438,804	$	8,732,461	$	1,556,756	$	7,175,705	$	—	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	8,438,804	$	8,732,461	$	1,556,756	$	7,175,705	$	—	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—

(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company.

(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(4) Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.

(5) Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations.

Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses approximate fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using
Description	Total		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)		Total		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments(4)	$	113,279	$	—	$	113,279	$	—	$	63,981	$	—	$	63,981	$	—
Investments(5)	$	3,884	3,884		—		—		$	5,531	5,531		—		—
Total Assets	$	117,163	$	3,884	$	113,279	$	—	$	69,512	$	5,531	$	63,981	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments(6)	$	925,202	$	—	$	925,202	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	925,202	$	—	$	925,202	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—

(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity, as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options’ contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.

(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(4) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

(5) Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds.

(6) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency collar options, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

The reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014, or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement.

The following table presents information about the Company’s goodwill, indefinite-life intangible assets and long-lived assets for our Pullmantur reporting unit recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount	Total Fair Value	Level 3	Total Impairment
Pullmantur Goodwill (1)	—	—	—	123,814
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names (2)	—	—	—	174,285
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels (3)	147,900	147,900	147,900	113,168
Total	147,900	147,900	147,900	411,267

(1) We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions was the decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur's fleet. The discounted cash flow model used our 2016 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years’ cash flows through 2020 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur’s reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur’s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 11%.

(2) We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asset using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. These trademarks and trade names relate to Pullmantur and we have used a discount rate of 11.5%, comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit.

(3) We estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using the market approach for the aircraft and a blended indication from the cost and market approaches for the vessels. A significant input in performing the fair value assessments for these assets was comparable market transactions.

We have master International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreements in place with our derivative instrument counterparties. These ISDA agreements provide for final close out netting with our counterparties for all positions in the case of default or termination of the ISDA agreement. We have determined that our ISDA agreements provide us with rights of setoff on the fair value of derivative instruments in a gain position and those in a loss position with the same counterparty. We have elected not to offset such derivative instrument fair values in our consolidated balance sheets.

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, no cash collateral was received or pledged under our ISDA agreements. See Credit Related Contingent Features for further discussion on contingent collateral requirements for our derivative instruments.

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial assets under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:

	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015									As of December 31, 2014
	Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	113,279	$	(112,567	)	$	—	$	712	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—
Total	$	113,279	$	(112,567	)	$	—	$	712	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial liabilities under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:

	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015										As of December 31, 2014
	Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	(925,202	)	$	112,567	$	—	$	(812,635	)	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)
Total	$	(925,202	)	$	112,567	$	—	$	(812,635	)	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)

Concentrations of Credit Risk

We monitor our credit risk associated with financial and other institutions with which we conduct significant business and, to minimize these risks, we select counterparties with credit risks acceptable to us and we seek to limit our exposure to an individual counterparty. Credit risk, including but not limited to counterparty nonperformance under derivative instruments, our credit facilities and new ship progress payment guarantees, is not considered significant, as we primarily conduct business with large, well-established financial institutions, insurance companies and export credit agencies many of which we have long-term relationships with and which have credit risks acceptable to us or where the credit risk is spread out among a large number of counterparties. As of September 30, 2015, our exposure under our derivative instruments was approximately $0.7 million. As of December 31, 2014, we did not have any exposure under our derivative instruments. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any of our significant counterparties. In addition, we have established guidelines we follow regarding credit ratings and instrument maturities to maintain safety and liquidity. We do not normally require collateral or other security to support credit relationships; however, in certain circumstances this option is available to us.

Derivative Instruments

We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. We manage these risks through a combination of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies. The financial impact of these hedging instruments is primarily offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. We achieve this by closely matching the notional amount, term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged. Although certain of our derivative financial instruments do not qualify or are not accounted for under hedge accounting, we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. We monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses.

We enter into various forward, swap and option contracts to manage our interest rate exposure and to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. These instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and the vast majority are designated as hedges. We also have non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in our foreign operations and investments.

At inception of the hedge relationship, a derivative instrument that hedges the exposure to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or a recognized asset or liability is designated as a fair value hedge. A derivative instrument that hedges a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments. Gains and losses on derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss of our non-derivative financial instruments and the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign operations and investments are recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss along with the associated foreign currency translation adjustment of the foreign operation.

On an ongoing basis, we assess whether derivatives used in hedging transactions are “highly effective” in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flow of hedged items. We use the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis for each hedge relationship under our interest rate, foreign currency and fuel hedging programs. We apply the same methodology on a consistent basis for assessing hedge effectiveness to all hedges within each hedging program (i.e. interest rate, foreign currency and fuel). We perform regression analyses over an observation period of up to three years, utilizing market data relevant to the hedge horizon of each hedge relationship. High effectiveness is achieved when a statistically valid relationship reflects a high degree of offset and correlation between the changes in the fair values of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. The determination of ineffectiveness is based on the amount of dollar offset between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item at the end of the reporting period. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or hedge accounting is discontinued, any change in fair value of the derivative since the last date at which it was determined to be effective is recognized in earnings. In addition, the ineffective portion of our highly effective hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and reported in Other income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Cash flows from derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. In the event that hedge accounting is discontinued, cash flows subsequent to the date of discontinuance are classified within investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are classified as investing activities.

We consider the classification of the underlying hedged item’s cash flows in determining the classification for the designated derivative instrument’s cash flows. We classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of benchmark interest rate or hedges of fuel expense as operating activities due to the nature of the hedged item. Likewise, we classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on our newbuild ship payments as investing activities and derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on debt payments as financing activities.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our long-term debt obligations including future interest payments. At September 30, 2015, approximately 33.0% of our long-term debt was effectively fixed as compared to 28.5% as of December 31, 2014. We use interest rate swap agreements to modify our exposure to interest rate movements and to manage our interest expense.

Market risk associated with our long-term fixed rate debt is the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating-rate basis to manage this risk. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the $420.0 million fixed rate portion of our Oasis of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan and on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes due 2022. The interest rate swap agreements on Oasis of the Seas debt effectively changed the interest rate on the balance of the unsecured term loan, which was $227.5 million as of September 30, 2015, from a fixed rate of 5.41% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.87%, currently approximately 4.28%. The interest rate swap agreements on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes effectively changed the interest rate of the unsecured senior notes from a fixed rate of 5.25% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.63%, currently approximately 3.95%. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges.

Market risk associated with our long-term floating rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis to manage this risk. In May 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements that hedge the anticipated unsecured amortizing term loan that will finance a portion of our purchase of Harmony of the Seas. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging the Harmony of the Seas loan will effectively convert the interest rate for €693.4 million, or approximately $774.2 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015, of the anticipated loan balance from EURIBOR plus 1.15% to a fixed rate of 2.26% (inclusive of margin) beginning in May 2016. In September 2015, we entered into forward-starting interest rate swap agreements that hedge the anticipated unsecured amortizing term loan that will finance our purchase of Ovation of the Seas. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging the Ovation of the Seas loan will effectively convert the interest rate for $830.0 million of the anticipated loan balance from LIBOR plus 1.00% to a fixed rate of 3.16% (inclusive of margin) beginning in April 2016. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

In addition, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our Celebrity Reflection term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the Celebrity Reflection unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $518.1 million from LIBOR plus 0.40% to a fixed rate (including applicable margin) of 2.85% through the term of the loan. Additionally, at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our Quantum of the Seas term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the Quantum of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $704.4 million from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.74% (inclusive of margin) through the term of the loan. Furthermore, at September 30, 2015, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our Anthem of the Seas term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the Anthem of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $725.0 million from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.86% (inclusive of margin) through the term of the loan. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements related to outstanding debt and on our current unfunded financing arrangements as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $4.4 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Derivative Instruments

Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to our ship construction contracts denominated in Euros, our foreign currency denominated debt and our international business operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements to manage portions of the exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As of September 30, 2015, the aggregate cost of our ships on order, not including the "Project Edge" ships and the TUI Cruises' ships on order, was approximately $5.0 billion, of which we had deposited $449.8 million as of such date. Approximately 43.7% and 28.8% of the aggregate cost of the ships under construction was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow, fair value or net investment hedges depending on the designation of the related hedge.

On a regular basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and, from time to time, we utilize cross-currency swap agreements to minimize the volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than our functional currency or the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries. During the third quarter of 2015, we maintained an average of approximately $517.2 million of these foreign currency forward contracts. These instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts resulted in a loss, of approximately $32.7 million and $35.1 million, respectively, during the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, and approximately $49.6 million and $24.2 million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, that were recognized in earnings within Other income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

We consider our investments in our foreign operations to be denominated in relatively stable currencies and of a long-term nature. As of September 30, 2015, we maintained foreign currency forward contracts of €415.6 million, or approximately $464.0 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015, and designated them as hedges of a portion of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises. These forward currency contracts mature in April 2016.

The notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts including our forward contracts and collar options as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $2.5 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively.

Non-Derivative Instruments

We also address the exposure of our investments in foreign operations by denominating a portion of our debt in our subsidiaries’ and investments’ functional currencies and designating it as a hedge of these subsidiaries and investments. We had designated debt as a hedge of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises of approximately €185.9 million and €139.4 million, or approximately $207.6 million and $168.7 million, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Fuel Price Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates primarily to the consumption of fuel on our ships. We use fuel swap agreements to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices.

Our fuel swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At September 30, 2015, we have hedged the variability in future cash flows for certain forecasted fuel transactions occurring through 2019. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements:

	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015	As of December 31, 2014
	(metric tons)
2015	197,000	806,000
2016	930,000	802,000
2017	854,000	525,000
2018	583,000	226,000
2019	153,000	—

	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
	(% hedged)
Projected fuel purchases:
2015	57	%	58	%
2016	65	%	55	%
2017	59	%	35	%
2018	40	%	15	%
2019	10	%	—

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $252.0 million and $223.1 million, respectively, of estimated unrealized net loss associated with our cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements were expected to be reclassified to earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive loss within the next twelve months. Reclassification is expected to occur as the result of fuel consumption associated with our hedged forecasted fuel purchases.

The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
	Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014		Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
		Fair Value		Fair Value			Fair Value		Fair Value
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20(1)
Interest rate swaps	Other assets	$	1,691	$	—	Other long-term liabilities	$	93,807	$	65,768
Foreign currency forward contracts	Derivative financial instruments	107,668		—		Derivative financial instruments	292,372		17,619
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other assets	—		63,981		Other long-term liabilities	—		164,627
Foreign currency collar options	Derivative financial instruments	—		—		Derivative financial instruments	—		21,855
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments	—		—		Derivative financial instruments	239,715		227,512
Fuel swaps	Other assets	—		—		Other long-term liabilities	277,158		270,254
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under 815-20		109,359		63,981			903,052		767,635
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments	3,079		—		Derivative financial instruments	17,437		—
Fuel swaps	Other Assets	841		—		Other long-term liabilities	4,713		—
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under 815-20		3,920		—			22,150		—
Total derivatives		$	113,279	$	63,981		$	925,202	$	767,635

(1)Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

		Carrying Value
Non-derivative instrument designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815-20	Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign currency debt	Long-term debt	$	207,585	$	168,718
		$	207,585	$	168,718

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:

Derivatives and Related Hedged Items under ASC 815-20 Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative									Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015		Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	2,793	$	3,063		$	8,640	$	9,199	$	3,968		$	3,968	$	11,775		$	13,435
Interest rate swaps	Other income	22,341		(3,010		)	21,780		24,431		(20,252		)	3,934		(18,245		)	(19,122		)
		$	25,134	$	53		$	30,420	$	33,630	$	(16,284	)	$	7,902	$	(6,470	)	$	(5,687	)

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

Derivatives under  ASC  815-20  Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative  (Effective Portion)												Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income  (Effective Portion)
	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014				Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(261	)
Interest rate swaps	(68,956		)	1,331			(75,104		)	(71,621		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(10,276		)	(3,106		)	(27,024		)	(9,312		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	(619		)	(163,387		)	(131,211		)	(172,629		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(752		)	(450		)	(2,153		)	(1,348		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Other income	(239		)	(238		)	(715		)	(4,052		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	—			—			—			(57		)
Foreign currency collar options	34			(21,904		)	(64,559		)	(30,638		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(568		)	—			(1,003		)	—
Fuel swaps	(230,761		)	(71,456		)	(213,072		)	(64,527		)	Fuel	(65,975		)	(1,996		)	(172,083		)	(1,206		)
	$	(300,302	)	$	(255,416	)	$	(483,946	)	$	(339,415	)		$	(77,810	)	$	(5,790	)	$	(202,978	)	$	(16,236	)

Derivatives under ASC 815- 20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Other income	(617		)	17			(395		)	(78		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	—			15			—			(12		)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(2,353		)	(8,069		)	(2,771		)	(7,607		)
		$	(2,970	)	$	(8,037	)	$	(3,166	)	$	(7,697	)

The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  (Effective Portion)
Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20 Net Investment Hedging Relationships	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign Currency Debt	$	(436	)	$	13,408	$	8,955	$	18,038
	$	(436	)	$	13,408	$	8,955	$	18,038

There was no amount recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) for thequarters and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015and September 30, 2014, respectively.

The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

		Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815-20	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	$	(32,705	)	$	(35,175	)	$	(49,607	)	$	(24,405	)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(76		)	(220		)	(191		)	(1,157		)
		$	(32,781	)	$	(35,395	)	$	(49,798	)	$	(25,562	)

Credit Related Contingent Features

Our current interest rate derivative instruments may require us to post collateral if our Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s credit ratings remain below specified levels. Specifically, if on the fifth anniversary of entering into a derivative transaction or on any succeeding fifth-year anniversary our credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt were to be rated below BBB- by Standard & Poor’s and Baa3 by Moody’s, then each counterparty to such derivative transaction with whom we are in a net liability position that exceeds the applicable minimum call amount may demand that we post collateral in an amount equal to the net liability position. The amount of collateral required to be posted following such event will change each time our net liability position increases or decreases by more than the applicable minimum call amount. If our credit rating for our senior unsecured debt is subsequently equal to or above BBB- by Standard & Poor’s or Baa3 by Moody’s, then any collateral posted at such time will be released to us and we will no longer be required to post collateral unless we meet the collateral trigger requirement at the next fifth-year anniversary. Currently, our senior unsecured debt credit rating is BB+ with a stable outlook by Standard & Poor’s and Ba1 with a stable outlook by Moody’s. We currently have seven interest rate derivative hedges that have a term of at least five years.  The aggregate fair values of all derivative instruments with such credit-related contingent features in net liability positions as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $93.8 million and $65.8 million, respectively, which do not include the impact of any such derivatives in net asset positions. The earliest that any of the seven interest rate derivative hedges will reach their fifth anniversary is November 2016. Therefore, as of September 30, 2015, we were not required to post collateral for any of our derivative transactions.

XML

Shareholders' Equity

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Equity [Abstract]

Shareholders' Equity

Shareholders’ Equity

In September 2015, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.375 per share which was paid in the fourth quarter of 2015. During the first and second quarters of 2015, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share. During the first quarter of 2015, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2014.

During the third quarter of 2014, we declared a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.30 per share which was paid in the fourth quarter of 2014. During the first and second quarters of 2014, we declared and paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.25 per share. During the first quarter of 2014, we also paid a cash dividend on our common stock of $0.25 per share which was declared during the fourth quarter of 2013.

In October 2015, our board of directors authorized a common stock repurchase program for up to $500 million. The timing and number of shares purchased will depend on a variety of factors including price and market conditions.  Repurchases under the program are expected to be funded from available cash or borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. On October 23, 2015, we executed an agreement with an investment bank to purchase a total of $200 million, of the $500 million authorized amount, of our common stock under an accelerated stock repurchase (ASR) transaction. Under the terms of the ASR agreement, we will receive upfront the majority of the shares of our common stock to be repurchased based on current market prices in exchange for a prepayment of $200 million. The final number of shares to be repurchased will be determined upon settlement based on the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of our common stock during the term of the transaction, less a discount (the "Final Repurchase Price"). Upon final settlement, which is expected no later than the end of January 2016, and depending on the Final Repurchase Price, the investment bank may be required to deliver additional shares of common stock to us or we may be required to deliver shares of common stock or to make a cash payment, at our election, to the investment bank. The initial shares received upon prepayment and incremental shares received at maturity, if any, will be recorded in Shareholders’ equity upon delivery, based on the current market price of our common stock. Future stock repurchase transactions could include open market purchases or additional accelerated share repurchases. We expect to complete the program by the end of 2016.

XML

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax, Attributable to Parent [Abstract]

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015												Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
	Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Changes related to cash flow derivative hedges			Changes in defined benefit plans			Foreign currency translation adjustments			Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income at beginning of the year	$	(826,026	)	$	(31,207	)	$	(39,761	)	$	(896,994	)	$	43,324		$	(23,994	)	$	(13,659	)	$	5,671
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	(483,946		)	4,213			(23,994		)	(503,727		)	(339,415		)	(6,829		)	(19,842		)	(366,086		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	202,978			1,354			—			204,332			16,236			1,293			1,997			19,526
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income	(280,968		)	5,567			(23,994		)	(299,395		)	(323,179		)	(5,536		)	(17,845		)	(346,560		)
Ending balance	$	(1,106,994	)	$	(25,640	)	$	(63,755	)	$	(1,196,389	)	$	(279,855	)	$	(29,530	)	$	(31,504	)	$	(340,889	)

The following table presents reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive  Income (Loss) into Income
Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014			Affected Line Item in  Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Loss) gain on cash flow derivative hedges:
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(261	)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Interest rate swaps	(10,276		)	(3,106		)	(27,024		)	(9,312		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Foreign currency forward contracts	(752		)	(450		)	(2,153		)	(1,348		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses
Foreign currency forward contracts	(239		)	(238		)	(715		)	(4,052		)	Other income
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			(57		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
Foreign currency collar options	(568		)	—			(1,003		)	—			Depreciation and amortization expenses
Fuel swaps	(65,975		)	(1,996		)	(172,083		)	(1,206		)	Fuel
	(77,810		)	(5,790		)	(202,978		)	(16,236		)
Amortization of defined benefit plans:
Actuarial loss	(354		)	(222		)	(1,061		)	(666		)	Payroll and related
Prior service costs	—			(209		)	(293		)	(627		)	Payroll and related
	(354		)	(431		)	(1,354		)	(1,293		)
Release of foreign cumulative translation due to sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses:
Foreign cumulative translation	—			—			—			(1,997		)	Other operating
Total reclassifications for the period	$	(78,164	)	$	(6,221	)	$	(204,332	)	$	(19,526	)

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Accounting

Basis for Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Estimates are required for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with these principles. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Refer to Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.

Basis of Consolidation

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. We consolidate entities over which we have control, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest of greater than 50%, and variable interest entities where we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Refer to Note 5. Other Assets for further information regarding our variable interest entities. For affiliates we do not control but over which we have significant influence on financial and operating policies, usually evidenced by a direct ownership interest from 20% to 50%, the investment is accounted for using the equity method. We consolidate the operating results of Pullmantur and CDF Croisières de France on a two-month lag to allow for more timely preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Except for the impairment of Pullmantur related assets, as described in Note 3. Impairment of Pullmantur Related Assets, no material events or transactions affecting Pullmantur or CDF Croisières de France have occurred during the two-month lag period of August and September 2015 that would require further disclosure or adjustment to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2015

Revenue and Expense Recognition

Revenues and Expenses

We recognize passenger ticket revenues, revenues from onboard and other goods and services and all associated cruise operating costs for all of our uncompleted voyages on a pro-rata basis. Prior to September 30, 2014, we recognized revenues and cruise operating costs for our shorter voyages (voyages of ten days or less) upon voyage completion while we recognized revenues and cruise operating costs for voyages in excess of ten days on a pro-rata basis.

The change to prorate all voyages as of September 30, 2014 forward was not retrospectively applied to prior periods, as the impact of prorating all voyages was immaterial to the respective periods presented.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the principles used to recognize revenue for all entities. The guidance is based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not comprehensively addressed in the prior accounting guidance. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods. In August 2015, the effective date of this guidance was deferred by one year and will now be effective for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for our annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of this newly issued guidance to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, GAAP guidance was issued requiring management to evaluate, at each annual and interim reporting period, whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued and provide related disclosures. This guidance will be effective for our annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2016 and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued changing the requirements for reporting extraordinary and unusual items in the income statement. The update eliminates the concept of extraordinary items. The presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued affecting current consolidation guidance. The guidance changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. This guidance must be applied using one of two retrospective application methods and will be effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs. The guidance requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by these amendments. Additionally, in August 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify the presentation of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. The amendments continue to allow an entity to present debt issuance costs as an asset with subsequent amortization over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. This guidance should be applied on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements, with the exception of reclassifying debt issuance costs from Other assets to be reflected as a reduction of our current and long-term liabilities.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to provide a practical expedient for the measurement date of an employer's defined benefit obligation and plan assets. The guidance provides a practical expedient for entities with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end and for contributions or significant events that occur between the month-end date and an entity's fiscal year end. The guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to clarify a customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The amendments provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license or if the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. This guidance will impact the accounting of software licenses but will not change a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The guidance will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments either prospectively or retrospectively. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the measurement of inventory for all entities. The amendments apply to all inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out or average cost. The guidance requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The guidance must be applied prospectively and will be effective for our interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, amended GAAP guidance was issued to simplify the accounting for measurement-period adjustments related to business combinations. The amendments require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined and eliminates the requirement to retroactively adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The adoption of this newly issued guidance is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Other

Other

Revenues and expenses include port costs that vary with guest head counts. The amounts of such port costs included in Passenger ticket revenues on a gross basis were $156.8 million and $155.0 million for the third quarters of 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $425.6 million and $416.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Reclassification

Reclassifications

On January 1, 2015, we adopted ASC 853, Service Concession Arrangements ("ASC 853"), using the modified retrospective approach. Due to the adoption of ASC 853, $41.9 million has been reclassified in the consolidated balance sheet, as of December 31, 2014, from Property and equipment, net to Other assets in order to conform to the current year presentation. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended September 30,2014, $1.2 million has been reclassified in the consolidated statements of cash flows from Other, net to Net deferred income tax (benefit) expense within Net cash provided by operating activities in order to conform to the current year presentation.

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments (Details) - Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Level 1
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	[1],[2]	$ 147,419	$ 189,241
Total Assets	[2]	147,419	189,241
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)	[2],[3]	1,556,756	1,859,361
Total Liabilities	[2]	1,556,756	1,859,361
Level 2
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	[1]	0	0
Total Assets		0	0
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)	[3]	7,175,705	6,902,053
Total Liabilities		7,175,705	6,902,053
Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	[1]	0	0
Total Assets		0	0
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)	[3]	0	0
Total Liabilities		0	0
Total Carrying Amount
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	[1]	147,419	189,241
Total Assets		147,419	189,241
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)	[3]	8,438,804	8,391,301
Total Liabilities		8,438,804	8,391,301
Total Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	[1]	147,419	189,241
Total Assets		147,419	189,241
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)	[3]	8,732,461	8,761,414
Total Liabilities		$ 8,732,461	$ 8,761,414

[1] Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.

[2] Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

[3] Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations.

XML

General (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015
Maximum
General
Investment in a joint venture, percentage of interest	50.00%
Minimum
General
Investment in a joint venture, percentage of interest	20.00%
TUI Cruises
General
Investment in a joint venture, percentage of interest	50.00%
Pullmantur and CDF Croisieres de France
General
Time lag in consolidation	2 months

XML

Other Assets Other Assets (Details) $ in Thousands, € in Millions	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	May. 31, 2015 EUR (€)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) ship	Jun. 30, 2015 EUR (€)	Mar. 31, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) ship	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 EUR (€) ship	Mar. 31, 2015 EUR (€)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)
Other Assets
Payments received related to loans to affiliates						$ 122,710	$ 76,167
Income from equity method investments		$ 38,400			$ 25,700	$ 62,200	34,700
Grand Bahamas Shipyard Ltd. | Not Primary Beneficiary
Other Assets
Percentage of ownership interest		40.00%				40.00%		40.00%
Investments in entity		$ 52,700				$ 52,700				$ 53,800
Advances to Affiliate		40,200				40,200				46,100
Underlying equity in net assets		12,500				12,500				7,700
Grand Bahamas Shipyard Ltd. | Not Primary Beneficiary | Accrual status of advances to affiliates
Other Assets
Payments received related to loans to affiliates						$ 3,100	$ 3,600
Grand Bahamas Shipyard Ltd. | Not Primary Beneficiary | Non-accrual status of advances to affiliates
Other Assets
Payments received related to loans to affiliates		$ 2,800
TUI Cruises GmbH joint venture
Other Assets
Percentage of ownership interest		50.00%				50.00%		50.00%
Investments in entity		$ 338,400				$ 338,400				370,100
Debt, guaranteed percentage	50.00%
Current borrowing capacity increase | €	€ 40.0		€ 40.0
Number of ships on order | ship		4				4		4
Additional amount outstanding on line of credit provided to TUI Cruises		$ 159,300				$ 159,300		€ 142.7
Percentage of bank committed financing		80.00%				80.00%		80.00%
Unsecured term loan | €								€ 150.0
Reduction of current ownership interest (as a percent)		37.55%				37.55%		37.55%
Skysea Holding
Other Assets
Percentage of ownership interest		35.00%				35.00%		35.00%
Investments in entity		$ 101,600				$ 101,600				$ 106,300
Debt, guaranteed percentage						100.00%
Interest rate on loan provided to related party (as a percent)		3.00%				3.00%		3.00%
Advances to Affiliate		$ 80,000				$ 80,000
Increase in interest rate every two years						0.50%
Splendour of the Seas [Domain] | TUI Cruises GmbH joint venture
Other Assets
Debt, guaranteed percentage				50.00%
Expected sales price of ship | €									€ 188.0
Long term debt, term				10 years
Interest rate on loan provided to related party (as a percent)				6.25%					6.25%
Hedged sales price of ship				$ 213,000

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Balance Sheet Hedging Instruments (Details) - Foreign currency debt - Pullmantur and TUI Cruises - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Net investment hedge
Carrying Value of Non-derivative instrument Designated as hedging instrument	$ 207,585	$ 168,718
Long-term debt
Net investment hedge
Carrying Value of Non-derivative instrument Designated as hedging instrument	$ 207,585	$ 168,718

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Operating Activities
Net income	$ 458,984	$ 654,378
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization	617,678	579,063
Impairment of Pullmantur related assets	411,267	0
Net deferred income tax (benefit) expense	(13,466)	1,177
Loss on derivative instruments not designated as hedges	49,607	24,234
Loss on sale of property and equipment	0	17,401
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in trade and other receivables, net	24,130	69,833
(Increase) decrease in inventories	(8,377)	13,900
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets	(30,649)	(3,596)
Decrease in accounts payable	(22,915)	(33,668)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest	34,207	(36,693)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities	11,558	48,600
Increase in customer deposits	65,511	104,211
Other, net	10,401	20,724
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,607,936	1,459,564
Investing Activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(1,360,637)	(559,018)
Cash paid on settlement of derivative financial instruments	(158,890)	(14,808)
Investments in and loans to unconsolidated affiliates	(54,250)	(69,748)
Cash received on loans to unconsolidated affiliates	122,710	76,167
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment	0	220,000
Other, net	(18,642)	2,592
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,469,709)	(344,815)
Financing Activities
Debt proceeds	2,962,501	1,917,550
Debt issuance costs	(57,146)	(49,641)
Repayments of debt	(2,887,237)	(2,958,427)
Dividends paid	(197,718)	(131,857)
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options	6,902	65,885
Cash received on settlement of derivative financial instruments	0	22,835
Other, net	1,778	1,422
Net cash used in financing activities	(170,920)	(1,132,233)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(9,129)	(4,022)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(41,822)	(21,506)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	189,241	204,687
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	147,419	183,181
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amount capitalized	$ 151,661	$ 208,311

XML

Other Assets Other Assets

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Schedule of Investments [Abstract]

Other Assets Disclosure

Other Assets

A Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) is an entity in which the equity investors have not provided enough equity to finance the entity’s activities or the equity investors: (1) cannot directly or indirectly make decisions about the entity’s activities through their voting rights or similar rights; (2) do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity; (3) do not have the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (4) have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the entity’s activities involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.

We have determined that TUI Cruises GmbH, our 50%-owned joint venture, which operates the brand TUI Cruises, is a VIE. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our investment, including equity and loans, in TUI Cruises was approximately $338.4 million and $370.1 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2015, this amount was included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we and TUI AG, our joint venture partner, have each guaranteed the repayment of 50% of a bank loan originally borrowed by TUI Cruises in 2011 and refinanced in May 2015. In connection with the refinancing, the principal amount of the loan was increased by €40.0 million. As of September 30, 2015, the outstanding principal amount of the loan was €142.7 million, or approximately $159.3 million based on the exchange rate at September 30, 2015. In addition the maturity date was extended from May 2016 to May 2022. Notwithstanding this, the lenders have agreed to release each shareholder's guarantee in 2018. The loan continues to amortize quarterly and to be secured by first mortgages on the Mein Schiff 1 and Mein Schiff 2 vessels. Based on current facts and circumstances, we do not believe potential obligations under our guarantee of this bank loan are probable.

The €40.0 million of additional proceeds received by TUI Cruises in connection with the refinancing of the bank loan discussed above were used during the second quarter of 2015 to repay in full the outstanding balance of the debt facility we originally provided to TUI Cruises in 2011 in connection with our sale of Celebrity Mercury.

Our investment amount and the potential obligations under this guarantee are substantially our maximum exposure to loss. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of TUI Cruises. We believe that the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact TUI Cruises’ economic performance are shared between ourselves and TUI AG. All the significant operating and financial decisions of TUI Cruises require the consent of both parties, which we believe creates shared power over TUI Cruises. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and account for this investment under the equity method of accounting.

As of September 30, 2015, TUI Cruises has four newbuild ships on order with Meyer Turku scheduled to be delivered in each of 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. TUI Cruises has in place commitments for the financing of up to 80% of the contract price of each ship on order. The remaining portion of the contract price of the ships will be funded with a €150.0 million bank facility and TUI Cruises’ cash flows from operations. The various ship construction and credit agreements include certain restrictions on each of our and TUI AG’s ability to reduce our current ownership interest in TUI Cruises below 37.55% through 2021.

In March 2015, we announced the pending sale of Splendour of the Seas to TUI Cruises. The sale for €188.0 million is scheduled to be completed in April 2016 in order to retain the future revenues to be generated for sailings through that date. After the sale, TUI Cruises will lease the ship to Thomson Cruises, which will operate the ship. The purchase price will be financed by us under a secured credit agreement to be repaid over 10 years. The resulting term loan will be 50% guaranteed by TUI AG and will be secured by a first mortgage on the ship. Interest will accrue at the rate of 6.25% per annum. We executed certain forward contracts to lock in the sales price of the ship at approximately $213 million. We expect to recognize a gain on the sale, which we do not expect will have a material effect to our consolidated financial statements.

We have determined that Grand Bahama Shipyard Ltd. (“Grand Bahama”), a ship repair and maintenance facility in which we have a 40% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE. The facility serves cruise and cargo ships, oil and gas tankers and offshore units.  We utilize this facility, among other ship repair facilities, for our regularly scheduled drydocks and certain emergency repairs as may be required. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of this facility as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the facility’s economic performance. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, 2015, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately $52.7 million, consisting of $12.5 million in equity and $40.2 million in loans. As of December 31, 2014, the net book value of our investment in Grand Bahama was approximately $53.8 million, consisting of $7.7 million in equity and $46.1 million in loans. These amounts represent our maximum exposure to loss. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, we received approximately $3.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in principal and interest payments related to a loan that is in accrual status from Grand Bahama, which was paid in full during the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The remaining amount of our loan to Grand Bahama is in non-accrual status and is included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets for which we received payments of approximately $2.8 million during the quarter ended September 30 , 2015. We monitor credit risk associated with this loan through our participation on Grand Bahama’s board of directors along with our review of Grand Bahama’s financial statements and projected cash flows. Based on this review, we believe the risk of loss associated with the outstanding loan is not probable as of September 30, 2015.

We have determined that Skysea Holding, in which we have a 35% noncontrolling interest, is a VIE for which we are not the primary beneficiary, as we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Accordingly, we do not consolidate this entity and we account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. In addition, we and Ctrip.com International Ltd, which also owns 35% of Skysea Holding, each provided a debt facility to a wholly owned subsidiary of Skysea Holding in the amount of $80.0 million. Interest under these facilities, which mature in January 2030, initially accrues at a rate of 3.0% per annum with an increase of at least 0.5% every two years through maturity. The facilities, which are pari passu to each other, are each 100% guaranteed by Skysea Holding and are secured by a first priority mortgage on the ship, Golden Era, formerly known as Celebrity Century, which we sold to a wholly owned subsidiary of Skysea Holding in September 2014. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our investment in Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries, including equity and loans, was approximately $101.6 million and $106.3 million, respectively. This amount was included within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets. Our investment amount is substantially our maximum exposure to loss. During the quarter ended June 30, 2015, Skysea Holding and its subsidiaries commenced operations through the brand SkySea Cruises.

Our share of income from investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting, including the entities discussed above, was $38.4 million and $25.7 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, and $62.2 million and $34.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, and was recorded within Other income.

XML

Long-Term Debt (Details) € in Millions, $ in Millions	1 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2015 USD ($)	Apr. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Oct. 23, 2015 USD ($)	Jul. 31, 2015 EUR (€)	Jun. 30, 2015 USD ($)
Anthem of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan
Long-Term Debt
Guarantee Percent		95.00%
Anthem of the Seas Unsecured Term Loan | LIBOR
Long-Term Debt
Unsecured term loan maximum borrowing capacity		$ 742.1
Long term debt, term			12 years
Margin on floating rate base			1.30%
Effective interest rate			1.71%
Revolving Credit Facility Due in June 2020 | LIBOR
Long-Term Debt
Margin on floating rate base			1.50%
Current borrowing capacity						$ 1,100.0
Credit agency fees percentage of outstanding loan balance			0.25%
Additional amount allowed to increase credit facility						$ 300.0
Revolving Credit Facility Due In August 2018 | LIBOR
Long-Term Debt
Margin on floating rate base	1.50%
Current borrowing capacity	$ 1,200.0
Credit agency fees percentage of outstanding loan balance	0.25%
Additional amount allowed to increase credit facility	$ 300.0
Unsecured Term Loan LIBOR Plus 1 Point 75 Percent Due August 2018 | LIBOR
Long-Term Debt
Unsecured term loan maximum borrowing capacity	$ 380.0
Margin on floating rate base			1.75%
Unsecured Term Loan EURIBOR Plus 1 point 75 Percent Due July 2017 | EURIBOR
Long-Term Debt
Unsecured term loan maximum borrowing capacity | €					€ 365.0
Margin on floating rate base	1.75%
Unsecured Term Loan LIBOR Plus 1 Point 75 Percent Due February 2018 | LIBOR
Long-Term Debt
Unsecured term loan maximum borrowing capacity	$ 290.0
Margin on floating rate base	1.75%
Unsecured Term Loan LIBOR Plus 1 Point 75 Percent Due December 2019 | LIBOR
Long-Term Debt
Unsecured term loan maximum borrowing capacity	$ 65.0
Margin on floating rate base	1.75%
Subsequent Event [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility Due in June 2020 | LIBOR
Long-Term Debt
Current borrowing capacity				$ 1,400.0
Additional amount allowed to increase credit facility				$ 300.0

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments - Derivative Instruments (Details) € in Millions, $ in Millions	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2014 USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015 EUR (€)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)
Gains and losses from derivatives involved in hedging relationships
Percentage of aggregate cost exposed to fluctuations in the euro exchange rate	43.70%		43.70%		43.70%	28.80%
Interest rate swaps
Gains and losses from derivatives involved in hedging relationships
Notional amount	$ 4,400.0		$ 4,400.0			$ 2,900.0
Forward Contracts
Gains and losses from derivatives involved in hedging relationships
Change in fair value of foreign currency forward contracts recognized in earnings	32.7	$ 35.1	49.6	$ 24.2
Forward Contracts | Not Designated
Gains and losses from derivatives involved in hedging relationships
Notional amount	517.2		517.2
Forward Contracts | Designated as Hedging Instrument
Gains and losses from derivatives involved in hedging relationships
Notional amount	464.0		464.0		€ 415.6
Foreign exchange contracts
Gains and losses from derivatives involved in hedging relationships
Notional amount	2,500.0		2,500.0			$ 3,000.0
Cruise ships on order
Gains and losses from derivatives involved in hedging relationships
Aggregate cost of ships on order, not including TUI cruises and Project Edge ships on order			5,000.0
Amount deposited for cost of ships on order, including the conditional agreement for a third Quantum - class ship	$ 449.8		$ 449.8

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Derivative Instruments

Schedule of Derivative Instruments in Statement of Financial Position, Fair Value

The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
	Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014		Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
		Fair Value		Fair Value			Fair Value		Fair Value
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20(1)
Interest rate swaps	Other assets	$	1,691	$	—	Other long-term liabilities	$	93,807	$	65,768
Foreign currency forward contracts	Derivative financial instruments	107,668		—		Derivative financial instruments	292,372		17,619
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other assets	—		63,981		Other long-term liabilities	—		164,627
Foreign currency collar options	Derivative financial instruments	—		—		Derivative financial instruments	—		21,855
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments	—		—		Derivative financial instruments	239,715		227,512
Fuel swaps	Other assets	—		—		Other long-term liabilities	277,158		270,254
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under 815-20		109,359		63,981			903,052		767,635
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments	3,079		—		Derivative financial instruments	17,437		—
Fuel swaps	Other Assets	841		—		Other long-term liabilities	4,713		—
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under 815-20		3,920		—			22,150		—
Total derivatives		$	113,279	$	63,981		$	925,202	$	767,635

(1)Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

Non Derivative Instruments

The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

		Carrying Value
Non-derivative instrument designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815-20	Balance Sheet Location	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign currency debt	Long-term debt	$	207,585	$	168,718
		$	207,585	$	168,718

Schedule of Price Risk Derivatives

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements:

	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015	As of December 31, 2014
	(metric tons)
2015	197,000	806,000
2016	930,000	802,000
2017	854,000	525,000
2018	583,000	226,000
2019	153,000	—

	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015		As of December 31, 2014
	(% hedged)
Projected fuel purchases:
2015	57	%	58	%
2016	65	%	55	%
2017	59	%	35	%
2018	40	%	15	%
2019	10	%	—

Fair Value Measurements, Nonrecurring

The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using										Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents(4)	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	—	$	—	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—
Total Assets	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	147,419	$	—	$	—	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)(5)	$	8,438,804	$	8,732,461	$	1,556,756	$	7,175,705	$	—	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	8,438,804	$	8,732,461	$	1,556,756	$	7,175,705	$	—	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—

(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company.

(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(4) Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.

(5) Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations.

Non Derivative Instruments Qualifying and Designated as Hedging Instruments in Net Investment Hedges

The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  (Effective Portion)
Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20 Net Investment Hedging Relationships	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign Currency Debt	$	(436	)	$	13,408	$	8,955	$	18,038
	$	(436	)	$	13,408	$	8,955	$	18,038

Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using
Description	Total		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)		Total		Level 1(1)		Level 2(2)		Level 3(3)
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments(4)	$	113,279	$	—	$	113,279	$	—	$	63,981	$	—	$	63,981	$	—
Investments(5)	$	3,884	3,884		—		—		$	5,531	5,531		—		—
Total Assets	$	117,163	$	3,884	$	113,279	$	—	$	69,512	$	5,531	$	63,981	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments(6)	$	925,202	$	—	$	925,202	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	925,202	$	—	$	925,202	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—

(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity, as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options’ contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.

(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(4) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

(5) Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds.

(6) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency collar options, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.

Offsetting Assets

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial assets under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:

	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015									As of December 31, 2014
	Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	113,279	$	(112,567	)	$	—	$	712	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—
Total	$	113,279	$	(112,567	)	$	—	$	712	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—

Offsetting Liabilities

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial liabilities under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:

	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of September 30, 2015										As of December 31, 2014
	Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities
(In thousands)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	(925,202	)	$	112,567	$	—	$	(812,635	)	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)
Total	$	(925,202	)	$	112,567	$	—	$	(812,635	)	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)

Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring

The following table presents information about the Company’s goodwill, indefinite-life intangible assets and long-lived assets for our Pullmantur reporting unit recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount	Total Fair Value	Level 3	Total Impairment
Pullmantur Goodwill (1)	—	—	—	123,814
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names (2)	—	—	—	174,285
Long-lived assets—Pullmantur aircraft and vessels (3)	147,900	147,900	147,900	113,168
Total	147,900	147,900	147,900	411,267

(1) We estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions was the decision to reduce the size of Pullmantur's fleet. The discounted cash flow model used our 2016 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years’ cash flows through 2020 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur’s reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur’s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 11%.

(2) We estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asset using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. These trademarks and trade names relate to Pullmantur and we have used a discount rate of 11.5%, comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit.

(3) We estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using the market approach for the aircraft and a blended indication from the cost and market approaches for the vessels. A significant input in performing the fair value assessments for these assets was comparable market transactions.

Not Designated as Hedging Instrument

Derivative Instruments

Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss)

The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

		Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815-20	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	$	(32,705	)	$	(35,175	)	$	(49,607	)	$	(24,405	)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(76		)	(220		)	(191		)	(1,157		)
		$	(32,781	)	$	(35,395	)	$	(49,798	)	$	(25,562	)

Fair Value Hedging

Derivative Instruments

Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss)

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:

Derivatives and Related Hedged Items under ASC 815-20 Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative									Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Hedged Item
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015		Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	2,793	$	3,063		$	8,640	$	9,199	$	3,968		$	3,968	$	11,775		$	13,435
Interest rate swaps	Other income	22,341		(3,010		)	21,780		24,431		(20,252		)	3,934		(18,245		)	(19,122		)
		$	25,134	$	53		$	30,420	$	33,630	$	(16,284	)	$	7,902	$	(6,470	)	$	(5,687	)

Cash flow hedge

Derivative Instruments

Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss)

Derivatives under ASC 815- 20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
		Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Other income	(617		)	17			(395		)	(78		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income	—			15			—			(12		)
Fuel swaps	Other income	(2,353		)	(8,069		)	(2,771		)	(7,607		)
		$	(2,970	)	$	(8,037	)	$	(3,166	)	$	(7,697	)

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

Derivatives under  ASC  815-20  Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative  (Effective Portion)												Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income  (Effective Portion)
	Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014				Quarter Ended September 30, 2015			Quarter Ended September 30, 2014			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(261	)
Interest rate swaps	(68,956		)	1,331			(75,104		)	(71,621		)	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	(10,276		)	(3,106		)	(27,024		)	(9,312		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	(619		)	(163,387		)	(131,211		)	(172,629		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(752		)	(450		)	(2,153		)	(1,348		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Other income	(239		)	(238		)	(715		)	(4,052		)
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—			—			—			Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	—			—			—			(57		)
Foreign currency collar options	34			(21,904		)	(64,559		)	(30,638		)	Depreciation and amortization expenses	(568		)	—			(1,003		)	—
Fuel swaps	(230,761		)	(71,456		)	(213,072		)	(64,527		)	Fuel	(65,975		)	(1,996		)	(172,083		)	(1,206		)
	$	(300,302	)	$	(255,416	)	$	(483,946	)	$	(339,415	)		$	(77,810	)	$	(5,790	)	$	(202,978	)	$	(16,236	)