Fair Value of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company provides disclosure of financial assets and financial liabilities that are carried at fair value based on the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements may be classified based on the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities using the following three levels:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.) and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine such fair value:

	December 31, 2012
In thousands	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Marketable securities	$	45,035	$	—	$	45,035	$	—

	December 31, 2011
In thousands	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Warrant liability	$	58,639	$	—	$	58,639	$	—

The Company’s marketable securities are carried at fair value. The marketable securities all consist of U.S. government or government backed securities with maturities of less than one year. Marketable securities are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as their prices are based on observable inputs but not for identical securities. Therefore their fair value is based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1.

The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The increase in the fair value of the warrants was recognized in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. The changes in the fair value of the warrant liability for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

In thousands	2012			2011			2010
Balance, beginning of year	$	58,639		$	28,815		$	11,363
Issuance of warrants		—			—			—
Revaluation of warrants		15,924			46,715			19,532
Exercise of warrants		(74,563	)		(16,891	)		(2,080	)
Balance, end of year	$	—		$	58,639		$	28,815

The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. The carrying amount of the Company’s bank term loan approximates fair value due to its variable interest rate and other terms. All such measurements are Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s obligation under its executive compensation plan is based in part on the current fair market value of specified mutual funds, which is therefore stated at its estimated fair value.