XML 33 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Oct. 01, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 14—Fair Value Measurements

ASC No. 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized based on a three-level hierarchy. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 

    Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

    Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

    Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

We have certain assets and liabilities, such as our derivative instruments that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with GAAP.

Our derivative assets and liabilities represent Level 2 instruments. Level 2 instruments are valued based on observable inputs for quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets. The fair value for the derivative assets was $4.7 million and $0.6 million as of October 1, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively. The fair value for the derivative liabilities was $1.2 million and $8.0 million as of October 1, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively.

Transfers into and out of the fair value hierarchy levels are assumed to be as of the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred. Other than the transfer of the contingent consideration liability from Level 3 to Level 1 during the nine months ended October 1, 2016, no transfers between levels occurred during the three and nine months ended October 1, 2016 and October 3, 2015.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, short-term borrowings and long-term debt approximate their respective fair values, except as otherwise indicated. The carrying values and estimated fair values of our significant outstanding debt as of October 1, 2016 and January 2, 2016 were as follows:

 

     October 1, 2016      January 2, 2016  
     Carrying      Fair      Carrying      Fair  

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

   Value      Value      Value      Value  

6.750% senior notes due in 2020 1, 3

     614.9         651.6         613.0         641.4   

10.000% senior notes due in 2021 1, 2

     385.7         390.3         390.1         397.3   

5.375% senior notes due in 2022 1, 3

     517.6         540.8         516.8         522.4   

5.500% senior notes due in 2024 1, 3

     494.4         531.6         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,012.6       $ 2,114.3       $ 1,519.9       $ 1,561.1   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

1. The fair values were based on the trading levels and bid/offer prices observed by a market participant and are considered Level 1 financial instruments.
2. The outstanding aggregate principal amount of $350.0 million of our DSS Notes was assumed by Cott at a fair value of $406.0 million in connection with Cott’s acquisition of DSS. The premium of $56.0 million is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense using the effective interest method over the remaining contractual term of the DSS Notes. The remaining unamortized premium is $35.7 million and $40.1 million at October 1, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively.
3. The carrying value of our significant outstanding debt is net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $27.8 million and $20.6 million as of October 1, 2016 and January 2, 2016, respectively.