XML 42 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments And Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments And Contingencies

Note 17—Commitments and Contingencies

We lease buildings, machinery and equipment, computer hardware and furniture and fixtures. All contractual increases and rent free periods included in the lease contract are taken into account when calculating the minimum lease payment and recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Certain leases have renewal periods and contingent rentals, which are not included in the table below. The minimum annual payments under operating leases are as follows:

 

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

      

2012

   $ 19.1   

2013

     15.1   

2014

     14.0   

2015

     12.2   

2016

     9.7   

Thereafter

     20.5   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 90.6   
  

 

 

 

Operating lease expenses were:

 

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

      

Year ended December 31, 2011

   $ 25.9   

Year ended January 1, 2011

   $ 20.3   

Year ended January 2, 2010

     19.9   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 66.1   
  

 

 

 

Operating lease expenses are shown net of sublease income of $0.3 million for 2011. As of December 31, 2011, we had commitments for capital expenditures of approximately $20.5 million and commitments for inventory of approximately $271.5 million.

In 2007, we entered into a $39.7 million purchase obligation for new equipment to support our bottled water business. Of the $39.7 million, payments of $16.5 million were made as of December 29, 2007. We funded $32.5 million of water bottling equipment purchases through a finance lease arrangement in 2008. The quarterly payments under the lease obligation totaled approximately $8.8 million per annum for the first two years, $5.3 million per annum for the subsequent two years, then $1.7 million per annum for the final four years.

 

In January 2005, we were named as one of many defendants in a class action suit alleging the unauthorized use by the defendants of container deposits and the imposition of recycling fees on consumers. On June 2, 2006, the British Columbia Supreme Court granted the summary trial application, which resulted in the dismissal of the plaintiffs' action against us and the other defendants. On June 26, 2006, the plaintiffs appealed the dismissal of the action to the British Columbia Court of Appeals which was denied, and an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was rejected on December 20, 2007. In February 2005, similar class action claims were filed in a number of other Canadian provinces. Claims filed in Quebec have since been discontinued, but is unclear how the dismissal of the British Columbia case will impact the other cases.

As of December 31, 2011, our accrued liability for litigation contingencies with a probable likelihood of loss was $2.9 million related to a single contingency. Subsequent to December 31, 2011, we settled this legal matter for an amount not materially different than our accrued liability.

On August 17, 2010, we completed the Cliffstar Acquisition. The first $15.0 million of the contingent consideration was based upon the achievement of milestones in certain expansion projects in 2010, which were achieved in 2010. The remainder of the contingent consideration was based on the achievement of certain performance measures during the fiscal year ending January 1, 2011.

We were notified on May 9, 2011 by the seller of Cliffstar of certain objections to the performance measures used to calculate the contingent consideration, and the seller asserted a claim for amounts in excess of the amounts accrued as contingent consideration at July 2, 2011. The seller's remaining objections to the calculation of the contingent consideration are subject to an ongoing binding arbitration process under the terms of the asset purchase agreement. The seller is seeking up to $12.1 million in additional contingent consideration. The final resolution of these matters may result in amounts payable to the seller that vary materially from our current estimated fair value. We are currently unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this action. Any changes in the fair value of contingent consideration will be recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We are subject to various claims and legal proceedings with respect to matters such as governmental regulations, and other actions arising out of the normal course of business. Management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.

In addition, we are involved in legal matters where the likelihood of loss has been judged to be reasonably possible, but for which a range of the potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated.

We had $9.7 million in standby letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2011 ($12.6 million—January 1, 2011; $9.9 million—January 2).

We have future purchase obligations of $271.5 million that consist of commitments for the purchase of inventory, energy transactions, and payments related to information technology outsourcing agreements. These obligations represent the minimum contractual obligations expected under the normal course of business.