XML 27 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Apr. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

NOTE 9 — Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized using defined hierarchical levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair value measurements, as follows:

 

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value of the asset or liability.

 

Assets that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

 

The following tables provide information by level for the Company's available-for-sale securities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

As of April 30, 2016:

 

 

 

 

Using Inputs Considered as

 

 

    

Fair Value

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

 

Short-term investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

1,001

 

 

 —

 

 

1,001

 

 

 —

 

Total assets

 

$

1,001

 

$

 —

 

$

1,001

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

As of January 30, 2016:

 

 

 

 

Using Inputs Considered as

 

 

    

Fair Value

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

 

Short-term investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

2,810

 

 

 —

 

 

2,810

 

 

 —

 

Municipal bonds

 

 

205

 

 

 —

 

 

205

 

 

 —

 

Total assets

 

$

3,015

 

$

 —

 

$

3,015

 

$

 —

 

 

As of April 30, 2016, the Company’s available-for-sale securities were valued based on quoted prices for similar assets in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets in which there were fewer transactions. There were no transfers of assets between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy during the thirteen week periods ended April 30, 2016, and May 2, 2015. Consistent with Company policy, transfers into levels and transfers out of levels are recognized on the date of the event or when a change in circumstances causes a transfer.

 

Assets that are Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis:

 

The following table summarizes certain information for non-financial assets for the thirteen weeks ended April 30, 2016 and the fiscal year ended January 30, 2016, that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in periods subsequent to an initial recognition period.  The Company places amounts into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thirteen Weeks Ended

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

Long-Lived Assets Held and Used (in thousands):

    

April 30, 2016

    

January 30, 2016

 

Carrying value

 

$

168

 

$

356

 

Fair value measured using Level 3 inputs

 

$

0

 

$

75

 

Impairment charge

 

$

168

 

$

281

 

 

All of the fair value measurements included in the table above were based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Company determines fair value for measuring assets on a non-recurring basis using a discounted cash flow approach as discussed in Note 1, Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies in our Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2016. In determining future cash flows, the Company uses its best estimate of future operating results, which requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including estimated sales, merchandise margin and expense levels, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate; therefore, differences in the estimates or assumptions could produce significantly different results. General economic uncertainty impacting the retail industry and continuation of recent trends in company performance makes it reasonably possible that additional long-lived asset impairments could be identified and recorded in future periods.

 

The fair value measurement of the long-lived assets encompasses the following significant unobservable inputs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Range

 

Unobservable Inputs

   

Fiscal 2016

   

Fiscal 2015

 

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

    

15%

    

15%

 

Annual sales growth

 

0% to 11.4%

 

0% to 3.5%

 

 

n