XML 43 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Legal Proceedings
6 Months Ended
Aug. 01, 2020
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Legal Proceedings Legal Proceedings
 
We are subject, from time to time, to various claims, lawsuits or actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We accrue for loss contingencies associated with outstanding litigation or legal claims for which management has determined it is probable that a loss contingency exists and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If we determine an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable, we do not accrue a potential loss contingency.

On August 14, 2019, Mark Gottlieb, a Company stockholder, filed a purported class action lawsuit against Jonathan Duskin; Seth Johnson; Keri Jones; Kent Kleeberger; William Sharpe, III; Joel Waller and Laura Weil (the "Named Directors"), B. Riley FBR, Inc. and B. Riley Financial Inc., in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware (the "Court of Chancery"), on behalf of himself and all stockholders who held shares as of December 20, 2018. The lawsuit alleges that the Named Directors breached their duty of loyalty in connection with the Company's rejection in December of 2018, of an unsolicited bid to acquire the Company and seeks unspecified damages for shareholders' lost opportunity. The lawsuit further alleges that the B. Riley firms aided and abetted the asserted breach of the duty of loyalty by the Named Directors. The Company believes the Complaint is without merit. The Named Directors, and the Company on their behalf, together with the B. Riley firms, intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously. On September 18, 2019, the Director Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The motion was briefed by Plaintiff and the Defendants and oral argument on the motion were held before the Court of Chancery in February 2020. On May 27, 2020, the court announced a partial decision on the pending motions but asked for further briefing on the potentially dispositive issue of whether the claim is a derivative or direct, i.e. whether it belongs to the Company and cannot be brought by the Plaintiff or whether he may bring it directly. The parties have submitted further briefing on that issue and are awaiting the Court's decision.

The ultimate resolution of legal matters can be inherently uncertain and, for some matters, we may be unable to predict the ultimate outcome, determine whether a liability has been incurred or make an estimate of the reasonably possible liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome because of these uncertainties. We do not, however, currently believe that the resolution of any pending matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.