XML 42 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Valassis Communications, Inc. (referred to herein as “Valassis,” “we,” and “our”) and domestic and non-U.S. subsidiaries in which we hold a controlling financial interest. Our share of the earnings or losses of non-controlled affiliates over which we exercise significant influence (generally a 20% to 50% ownership interest) is included in Other income, net in the consolidated statements of income using the equity method of accounting. All intercompany balances and transactions between consolidated entities have been eliminated.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue recognition policies vary by product and are summarized as follows:

 

   

Revenues for newspaper-delivered promotions are recognized in the period the product is distributed in the newspaper. In accordance with industry practice, we generally bill clients in advance of the related distribution date. However, these billings are reflected as a progress billings liability until the distribution date.

 

   

Products and services not distributed via newspapers are recognized as revenues when the product is shipped, accepted by the USPS or the service is performed.

 

   

Coupon processing fee revenues are recognized on completion of coupon processing, and do not include the face value of the coupon or the retailer handling fee.

 

   

Taxes collected from clients are reported on a net basis and, as such, excluded from revenues.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Generally, matters subject to estimation and judgment include amounts related to accounts receivable realization, useful lives of intangible and fixed assets, fair value of reporting units for goodwill impairment testing and income taxes. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents

All highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivables are stated at amounts estimated by management to be the net realizable value. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded when it is probable amounts will not be collected based on specific identification of customer circumstances or the age of the receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $6.9 million and $12.1 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Accounts receivable are written off when it becomes apparent such amounts will not be collected. Generally, we do not require collateral or other security to support client receivables.

Inventories

Inventories are accounted for at the lower of cost, determined on a first in, first out (“FIFO”) basis, or market. Inventories included on the consolidated balance sheets consist of:

 

     December 31,  

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

   2011      2010  

Raw materials

   $ 28,075       $ 27,035   

Work in progress

     13,045         14,952   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Inventories

   $ 41,120       $ 41,987   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Client Contract Incentives

We occasionally provide upfront cash incentives to key clients to secure the value of a long-term contract. The cost of such incentives is capitalized and amortized as a reduction to revenues using the straight-line method over the life of the client contract.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Improvements that add significantly to the productive capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated life of the related asset or the lease-term using the straight-line method. We review the carrying amounts of our plant, property and equipment when facts and circumstances suggest the cash flows emanating from those assets may be diminished. The following table summarizes the cost and ranges of useful lives of the major classes of property, plant and equipment and the total accumulated depreciation related to the Property, plant and equipment, net included on the consolidated balance sheets:

 

          December 31,  
     Useful Lives            2011                     2010          
     (in years)    (in thousands of U.S. dollars)  

Land, at cost

   N/A    $ 7,167      $ 7,195   

Buildings, at cost

   10 – 30      37,511        37,657   

Machinery and equipment, at cost

     3 – 20      217,764        225,762   

Office furniture and equipment, at cost

     3 – 10      236,994        221,804   

Leasehold improvements, at cost

     5 – 10      28,563        28,174   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 
        527,999        520,592   

Less accumulated depreciation

        (379,094     (345,025
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

      $ 148,905      $ 175,567   
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation expense was $48.1 million, $48.8 million and $55.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Our intangible assets consist primarily of mailing lists, customer relationships, trade names and goodwill. An intangible asset with a finite useful life is amortized on a straight-line basis over its expected useful life, which approximates the manner in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed. We review the carrying amounts of our finite-lived assets when facts and circumstances suggest the cash flows emanating from those assets may be diminished. An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized but is evaluated at least annually as of December 31st for impairment and more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Reaching a determination on useful life requires significant judgments and assumptions regarding the future effects of obsolescence, competition and other economic factors. We have determined that our trade names have indefinite useful lives; therefore, we do not amortize them. The identification of units of accounting and the allocation of intangible assets by unit of accounting during 2011 were consistent with prior periods.

For goodwill, our annual impairment evaluation compares the fair value of each of our reporting units to its respective carrying amount and consists of two steps. First, we determine the fair values of each of our reporting units, as described below, and compare them to the corresponding carrying amounts. Second, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of the goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner equivalent to a purchase price allocation. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill.

We estimate the fair values of our reporting units based on projected future debt-free cash flows that are discounted to present value using factors that consider the timing and risk of the future cash flows. We believe this approach is appropriate because it provides a fair value estimate based upon the expected long-term operations and cash flow performance of each reporting unit. We estimate future cash flows for each of our reporting units based on our operating result projections for the respective operating unit. These projected cash flows are discounted to present value using a weighted average cost of capital thought to be indicative of market participants.

Consistent with the prior year, we tested the value assigned to our trade names utilizing an estimated market royalty rate representing the percentage of revenues a market participant would be willing to pay as a royalty for their use.

Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the consolidated financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Derivatives and Hedging Transactions

We use derivative financial instruments, including forward foreign exchange and interest rate swap contracts, to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. The use of these financial instruments mitigates exposure to these risks with the intent of reducing the variability of our operating results. We are not a party to leveraged derivatives and do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All derivatives are recorded at fair value and the changes in fair value are immediately included in earnings if the derivatives are not designated and do not qualify as effective hedges. If a derivative is a fair value hedge, then changes in the fair value of the derivative are offset against the changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged item. If a derivative is a cash flow hedge, then changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income until the underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income included the following:

 

     December 31,  

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

   2011     2010  

Unrealized changes in fair value of cash flow hedges

   $ (2,863   $ (2,787

Unrealized changes in fair value of available for sale securities

     —          117   

Foreign currency translation

     5,638        5,969   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax of $1,768 and $1,764 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively

   $ 2,775      $ 3,299   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars. All balance sheet accounts have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income statement amounts have been translated using the average exchange rate for the year. The gains and losses resulting from the changes in exchange rates from year-to-year have been reported as a component of stockholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash investments and accounts receivable. We place our cash in short-term high credit quality securities. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of clients comprising our client base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. No single client accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated accounts receivable or revenues as of or for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 or 2009.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which provides companies with the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. ASU 2011-08 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. When adopted, ASU 2011-08 will have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as a part of the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, ASU 2011-05 requires all non-owner transactions that affect an entity’s equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present the components of other comprehensive income, total other comprehensive income and the total of comprehensive income. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, which defers certain aspects of ASU 2011-05 related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. We have adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-05 that were not deferred by ASU 2011-12 and retrospectively applied herein the two-statement approach described above.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. The adoption of ASU 2009-13, applied prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning on or after January 1, 2011, did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.