XML 64 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

5.         Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures with respect to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on both a recurring and non-recurring basis. Under this guidance, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The authoritative guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels defined as follows:

 

 

 

 

Level 1 - Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

 

 

 

Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

 

 

 

 

Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability.

 

As part of the consideration for the Prostiva acquisition, (see Note 4), the estimated royalty payments between the minimum and maximum amounts are considered contingent consideration.  The contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date and is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved using Level 3 inputs.  The Level 3 inputs consist of the projected fiscal year of payments based on projected revenues and an estimated discount rate.  The fair value is determined by applying an appropriate discount rate that reflects the risk factors associated with the payment streams.  The changes in fair value that do not relate to the initial recognition of the liability as of the acquisition date are recognized in earnings.  The Company estimates the fair value of the future contingent consideration at $2.5 million at June 30, 2012. As a result, the Company recognized a contingent consideration gain of $172,000 during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012.  The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the contingent consideration liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

(in thousands)

2012

Beginning Balance

$

 2,734

Accretion expense

 

 300

Change in fair value of contingent consideration

 

 (172)

Ending Balance

$

 2,862