Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Fair Value Measurements

4. Fair Value Measurements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance related to disclosures of fair value measurements. The guidance requires gross presentation of activity within the Level 3 measurement roll-forward and details of transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 measurements. It also clarifies two existing disclosure requirements on the level of disaggregation of fair value measurements and disclosures on inputs and valuation techniques. A change in the hierarchy of an investment from its current level will be reflected in the period during which the pricing methodology of such investment changes. Disclosure of the transfer of securities from Level 1 to Level 2 or Level 3 will be made in the event that the related security is significant to total cash and investments. The Company did not have any transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy during the three months ended December 31, 2013.

A valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value has been established. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 -	Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 -	Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 -	Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

A financial asset’s or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table provides the assets carried at fair value, measured as of December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2013 (in thousands):

	Total		Quoted Prices in		Significant Other		Significant
	Carrying		Active Markets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
December 31, 2013:
Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	12,671	$	12,671	$	-	$	-
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Warrants		2,587		-		-		2,587

	Total			Quoted Prices in			Significant Other			Significant
	Carrying			Active Markets			Observable Inputs			Unobservable Inputs
	Value			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
March 31, 2013:
Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	18,649	$		18,649	$		-	$		-
Liabilities:
Derivative liability	$	529	$		-	$		-	$		529
Warrants		3,633			-			-			3,633

The table below reflects the activity for the Company’s major classes of liabilities measured at fair value (in thousands):

	Derivative
	Liability			Warrants
April  1, 2012
Valuation of original derivative liability	$	3,779		$	-
Warrant issuance with Senior Convertible Note		-			7,018
Warrant issuance with Senior Secured Term Loan		-			380
Valuation of derivative liability attributable to modification		542			-
Mark to market adjustment		(3,297	)		(2,817	)
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	1,024		$	4,581
Mark to market adjustment		(495	)		(948	)
Balance at March 31, 2013	$	529		$	3,633

	Derivative
	Liability			Warrants
April  1, 2013	$	529		$	3,633
Warrant issuance with Senior Secured Term Loan		-			315
Mark to market adjustment		(529	)		(1,361	)
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	-		$	2,587

Valuation Techniques

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less that are regarded as high quality, low risk investments and are measured using such inputs as quoted prices, and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Cash equivalents consist principally of certificates of deposits and money market accounts.

Derivative Liability

The Company has identified all of the derivatives (“Derivative Liability”) associated with the Exchanged Note which include put rights to require the investor to acquire an additional $15.0 million convertible note and additional warrants, holder change of control redemption rights, issuer optional redemption rights, sale redemption rights and a right to make payment in the form of stock rather than cash if certain equity conditions are met. The Derivative Liability is subject to revaluation at each balance sheet date, and any change in fair value will be recorded as a change in fair value of derivatives and warrants until the earlier of its exercise or expiration. The Company relies on assumptions in a lattice model to determine the fair value of the Derivative Liability. The Company has appropriately valued the Derivative Liability within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. (See Note 10, “Debt”, for discussion on the Exchanged Note, Derivative Liability and valuation assumptions used.)

Warrants

Warrants were issued in conjunction with the Initial Note and the Term Loans. (See Note 10, “Debt”, for additional information on warrants.) These warrants are subject to revaluation at each balance sheet date, and any change in fair value will be recorded as a change in fair value of derivatives and warrants until the earlier of their exercise or expiration.

The Company relies on assumptions used in a lattice model to determine the fair value of warrants. The Company has appropriately valued the warrants within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. (See Note 11, “Warrants and Derivative Liabilities”, for a discussion of the warrants and the valuation assumptions used.)