XML 78 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
The fair value amounts for cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, net, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt and capital lease obligations at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was based on expected future payments discounted using current interest rates offered to us on debt of the same remaining maturity and characteristics, including credit quality, and did not vary materially from carrying value.
 
Fair value is defined as an exit price representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability at the measurement date in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy as a basis for such assumptions which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
 
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability in which there is little or no market data.



Recurring Fair Value Measurement
 
During 2013, our investment in a privately-held conferencing company changed from a historical cost investment to an available-for-sale asset when that company’s shares began trading publicly on a foreign stock exchange. The fair value of this investment was based on the quoted price of our shares on that foreign exchange at the measurement date of December 31, 2013; therefore, the fair value of this investment was based on Level 1 inputs. As of December 31, 2013, the balance of this investment is included as a component of “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” on our consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2012, we had no assets or liabilities that were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. 

As further discussed in Note 12, we recorded a contingent consideration liability in connection with our Powwownow acquisition. The fair value of the liability was estimated using internal forecasts with inputs that are not observable in the market, and thus represents a Level 3 fair value measurement. The inputs in the Level 3 measurement are not supported by market activity, as they are probability assessments of expected future sales related to our acquisition of Powwownow during the earn-out period.

We have segregated all financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the table below (in thousands):

 
 
December 31, 2013
 
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Current Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities
$
3,537

 
$
3,537

 
$

 
$

Total
$
3,537

 
$
3,537

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Long-term Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earn-out liability
$
3,841

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,841

Total
$
3,841

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,841



Non-recurring Fair Value Measurement
 
We are required to record certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Generally, assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis are the result of impairment charges.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we measured certain non-financial assets at fair value due to impairment made by market conditions. The following table depicts the non-recurring fair value measurements discussed below by asset category and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the related assumptions were derived (in thousands):

 
December 31, 2013
 
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total Losses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land, building and improvements
$
786

 
$

 
$
786

 
$

 
$
964

Total
$
786

 
$

 
$
786

 
$

 
$
964



During the year ended December 31, 2013, we wrote down one of our facilities in Europe with a carrying amount of $1.8 million, including land, building and improvements, to its fair value of $0.8 million, based on quoted prices for similar assets in the market.