485BPOS 1 main.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-1A

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT (No. 033-42890)

 

UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

[X]

 

Pre-Effective Amendment No.

[ ]

 

Post-Effective Amendment No. 36

[X]

and

REGISTRATION STATEMENT (No. 811-06397)

 

UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

[X]

 

Amendment No. 36

[X]

 

Fidelity California Municipal Trust II

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

82 Devonshire St., Boston, Massachusetts 02109

(Address Of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant's Telephone Number: 617-563-7000

 

Scott C. Goebel, Secretary

82 Devonshire Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02109

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

It is proposed that this filing will become effective

 

( )

immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b).

 

(X)

on (April 29, 2010) pursuant to paragraph (b) at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

 

( )

60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

 

( )

on ( ) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of Rule 485 at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

 

( )

75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

 

( )

on ( ) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485 at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

 

If appropriate, check the following box:

 

( )

this post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment.

Fidelity's California Municipal Money Market Funds

Fund

Ticker

Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund
Class
/Ticker Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

FSPXX

Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

FCFXX

<R>In this prospectus, the term "shares" (as it relates to a fund) means the class of shares offered through this prospectus.</R>

Prospectus

April 29, 2010


fid120565


Contents

Fund Summary

<Click Here>

Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

 

<Click Here>

Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

Fund Basics

<Click Here>

Investment Details

 

<Click Here>

Valuing Shares

Shareholder Information

<Click Here>

Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares

 

<Click Here>

Converting Shares

 

<Click Here>

Exchanging Shares

 

<Click Here>

Features and Policies

 

<Click Here>

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

 

<Click Here>

Tax Consequences

Fund Services

<Click Here>

Fund Management

 

<Click Here>

Fund Distribution

Appendix

<Click Here>

Financial Highlights

Prospectus


Fund Summary

<R>Fund/Class:
Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund/Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund</R>

Investment Objective

The fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

Fee Table

The following table describes the fees and expenses that may be incurred when you buy and hold shares of the fund.

Shareholder fees (fees paid directly from your investment)

None

<R>Annual class operating expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your investment)</R>

<R>Management fee

0.20%</R>

<R>Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

None</R>

<R>Other expenses

0.14%</R>

<R>Total annual operating expenses

0.34%</R>

This example helps compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.

Let's say, hypothetically, that the annual return for shares of the fund is 5% and that your shareholder fees and the annual operating expenses for shares of the fund are exactly as described in the fee table. This example illustrates the effect of fees and expenses, but is not meant to suggest actual or expected fees and expenses or returns, all of which may vary. For every $10,000 you invested, here's how much you would pay in total expenses if you sell all of your shares at the end of each time period indicated:

<R>1 year

$ 35</R>

<R>3 years

$ 109</R>

<R>5 years

$ 191</R>

<R>10 years

$ 431</R>

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in municipal money market securities.
  • Normally investing at least 80% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes.

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

  • Potentially investing up to 20% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to California personal income tax.
  • Normally not investing in municipal securities whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.
  • Potentially investing more than 25% of total assets in municipal securities that finance similar types of projects.
  • Investing in compliance with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds for the quality, maturity, and diversification of investments.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Municipal Market Volatility. The municipal market is volatile and can be significantly affected by adverse tax, legislative, or political changes and the financial condition of the issuers of municipal securities.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure that are located in foreign countries can be affected by adverse political, regulatory, market, or economic developments in those countries.
  • Geographic Concentration. Unfavorable political or economic conditions within California can affect the credit quality of issuers located in that state.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or a provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease.

An investment in the fund is not a deposit of a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

Performance

The following information is intended to help you understand the risks of investing in the fund. The information illustrates the changes in the performance of the fund's shares from year to year. Past performance is not necessarily an indication of future performance.

Visit www.fidelity.com for updated return information.

Prospectus

<R>Year-by-Year Returns</R>

<R>Calendar Years

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009</R>

<R>

3.37%

2.20%

1.19%

0.79%

0.90%

2.13%

3.16%

3.39%

1.86%

0.15%</R>

<R>fid120580</R>

<R>During the periods shown in the chart:

Returns

Quarter ended</R>

<R>Highest Quarter Return

0.90%

December 31, 2000</R>

<R>Lowest Quarter Return

0.00%

December 31, 2009</R>

<R>Year-to-Date Return

0.00%

March 31, 2010</R>

<R>Average Annual Returns</R>

<R>For the periods ended
December 31, 2009

Past 1
year

Past 5
years

Past 10
years
</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

0.15%

2.13%

1.91%</R>

Investment Advisers

Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) is the fund's manager. Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) and other affiliates of FMR serve as sub-advisers for the fund.

Purchase and Sale of Shares

You may buy or sell shares of the fund through a Fidelity brokerage or mutual fund account, or through an investment professional. You may buy or sell shares in various ways:

Internet

www.fidelity.com

Phone

Fidelity Automated Service Telephone (FAST®) 1-800-544-5555

To reach a Fidelity representative 1-800-544-6666

Mail

Additional purchases:

Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003

Redemptions:

Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035

TDD - Service for the Deaf and Hearing Impaired

1-800-544-0118

The price to buy one share of the fund is its net asset value per share (NAV). Your shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after your investment is received in proper form.

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

The price to sell one share of the fund is its NAV. Your shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form.

The fund is open for business each day the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is open. Even if the NYSE is closed, the fund will be open for business on those days on which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (New York Fed) is open, the primary trading markets for the fund's portfolio instruments are open, and the fund's management believes there is an adequate market to meet purchase and redemption requests.

The fund has a minimum initial investment of $25,000. The fund may waive or lower purchase minimums.

Tax Information

The fund seeks to earn income and pay dividends exempt from federal income tax and California personal income tax. A portion of the dividends you receive may be subject to federal, state, or local income tax. You may also receive taxable distributions attributable to the fund's sale of municipal bonds.

Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries

<R>The fund, FMR, Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC), and/or their affiliates may pay intermediaries, including a bank, broker-dealer, retirement plan sponsor, administrator, or service-provider (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), for the sale of fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing your intermediary and your investment professional to recommend the fund over another investment. Ask your investment professional or visit your intermediary's web site for more information.</R>

Prospectus


Fund Summary

Fund:
Fidelity
California Municipal Money Market Fund

Investment Objective

The fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

Fee Table

The following table describes the fees and expenses that may be incurred when you buy and hold shares of the fund.

Shareholder fees (fees paid directly from your investment)

None

<R>Annual fund operating expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your investment)</R>

<R>Management fee

0.37%</R>

<R>Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

None</R>

<R>Other expenses

0.18%</R>

<R>Total annual fund operating expenses

0.55%</R>

This example helps compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.

Let's say, hypothetically, that the annual return for shares of the fund is 5% and that your shareholder fees and the annual operating expenses for shares of the fund are exactly as described in the fee table. This example illustrates the effect of fees and expenses, but is not meant to suggest actual or expected fees and expenses or returns, all of which may vary. For every $10,000 you invested, here's how much you would pay in total expenses if you sell all of your shares at the end of each time period indicated:

<R>1 year

$ 56</R>

<R>3 years

$ 176</R>

<R>5 years

$ 307</R>

<R>10 years

$ 689</R>

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in municipal money market securities.
  • Normally investing at least 80% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes.
  • Potentially investing up to 20% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to California personal income tax.

Prospectus

  • Potentially investing more than 25% of total assets in municipal securities that finance similar types of projects.
  • Investing in compliance with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds for the quality, maturity, and diversification of investments.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Municipal Market Volatility. The municipal market is volatile and can be significantly affected by adverse tax, legislative, or political changes and the financial condition of the issuers of municipal securities.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure that are located in foreign countries can be affected by adverse political, regulatory, market, or economic developments in those countries.
  • Geographic Concentration. Unfavorable political or economic conditions within California can affect the credit quality of issuers located in that state.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or a provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease.

An investment in the fund is not a deposit of a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

Performance

The following information is intended to help you understand the risks of investing in the fund. The information illustrates the changes in the performance of the fund's shares from year to year. Past performance is not necessarily an indication of future performance.

Visit www.fidelity.com for updated return information.

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

<R>Year-by-Year Returns</R>

<R>Calendar Years

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009</R>

<R>

3.31%

2.13%

1.03%

0.61%

0.73%

1.98%

3.00%

3.20%

1.67%

0.05%</R>

<R>fid120582</R>

<R>During the periods shown in the chart:

Returns

Quarter ended</R>

<R>Highest Quarter Return

0.88%

December 31, 2000</R>

<R>Lowest Quarter Return

0.00%

September 30, 2009</R>

<R>Year-to-Date Return

0.00%

March 31, 2010</R>

<R>Average Annual Returns</R>

<R>For the periods ended
December 31, 2009

Past 1
year

Past 5
years

Past 10
years
</R>

<R>Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

0.05%

1.98%

1.77%</R>

Investment Advisers

Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) is the fund's manager. Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) and other affiliates of FMR serve as sub-advisers for the fund.

Purchase and Sale of Shares

You may buy or sell shares of the fund through a Fidelity brokerage or mutual fund account, or through an investment professional. You may buy or sell shares in various ways:

Internet

www.fidelity.com

Phone

Fidelity Automated Service Telephone (FAST®) 1-800-544-5555

To reach a Fidelity representative 1-800-544-6666

Mail

Additional purchases:

Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003

Redemptions:

Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035

TDD - Service for the Deaf and Hearing Impaired

1-800-544-0118

The price to buy one share of the fund is its net asset value per share (NAV). Your shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after your investment is received in proper form.

Prospectus

The price to sell one share of the fund is its NAV. Your shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form.

The fund is open for business each day the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is open. Even if the NYSE is closed, the fund will be open for business on those days on which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (New York Fed) is open, the primary trading markets for the fund's portfolio instruments are open, and the fund's management believes there is an adequate market to meet purchase and redemption requests.

The fund has a minimum initial investment of $5,000. The fund may waive or lower purchase minimums.

Tax Information

The fund seeks to earn income and pay dividends exempt from federal income tax and California personal income tax. A portion of the dividends you receive may be subject to federal, state, or local income tax or may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. You may also receive taxable distributions attributable to the fund's sale of municipal bonds.

Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries

<R>The fund, FMR, Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC), and/or their affiliates may pay intermediaries, including a bank, broker-dealer, retirement plan sponsor, administrator, or service-provider (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), for the sale of fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing your intermediary and your investment professional to recommend the fund over another investment. Ask your investment professional or visit your intermediary's web site for more information.</R>

Prospectus


Fund Basics

Investment Details

Investment Objective

Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

Principal Investment Strategies

FMR normally invests the fund's assets in municipal money market securities.

FMR normally invests at least 80% of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes. Municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes include securities issued by U.S. territories and possessions, such as Guam, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico, and their political subdivisions and public corporations.

FMR may invest up to 20% of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to California personal income tax under normal circumstances. FMR does not currently intend to invest the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

The supply of and demand for municipal money market securities can vary from time to time. When FMR believes that suitable municipal money market securities are not available, or during other unusual market conditions, FMR may leave a significant portion of the fund's assets uninvested, or may invest up to 20% of the fund's assets in securities subject to state and/or federal income tax.

FMR may invest more than 25% of the fund's total assets in municipal securities that finance similar projects, such as those relating to education, health care, housing, transportation, and utilities.

In buying and selling securities for the fund, FMR complies with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds regarding the quality, maturity, and diversification of the fund's investments. FMR may invest the fund's assets in municipal money market securities by investing in other funds. FMR stresses maintaining a stable $1.00 share price, liquidity, and income.

Investment Objective

Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

Principal Investment Strategies

FMR normally invests the fund's assets in municipal money market securities.

FMR normally invests at least 80% of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes. Municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes include securities issued by U.S. territories and possessions, such as Guam, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico, and their political subdivisions and public corporations.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

FMR may invest up to 20% of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to California personal income tax under normal circumstances. FMR may invest all of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

The supply of and demand for municipal money market securities can vary from time to time. When FMR believes that suitable municipal money market securities are not available, or during other unusual market conditions, FMR may leave a significant portion of the fund's assets uninvested, or may invest up to 20% of the fund's assets in securities subject to state and/or federal income tax.

FMR may invest more than 25% of the fund's total assets in municipal securities that finance similar projects, such as those relating to education, health care, housing, transportation, and utilities.

In buying and selling securities for the fund, FMR complies with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds regarding the quality, maturity, and diversification of the fund's investments. FMR may invest the fund's assets in municipal money market securities by investing in other funds. FMR stresses maintaining a stable $1.00 share price, liquidity, and income.

Description of Principal Security Types

Money market securities are high-quality, short-term securities that pay a fixed, variable, or floating interest rate. Securities are often specifically structured so that they are eligible investments for a money market fund. For example, in order to satisfy the maturity restrictions for a money market fund, some money market securities have demand or put features, which have the effect of shortening the security's maturity. Municipal money market securities include variable rate demand notes, commercial paper, and municipal notes.

Municipal securities are issued to raise money for a variety of public and private purposes, including general financing for state and local governments, or financing for a specific project or public facility. Municipal securities may be fully or partially backed by the local government, by the credit of a private issuer, by the current or anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets, or by domestic or foreign entities providing credit support such as letters of credit, guarantees, or insurance.

Principal Investment Risks

Many factors affect each fund's performance. Because FMR concentrates each fund's investments in California, the fund's performance is expected to be closely tied to economic and political conditions within that state and to be more volatile than the performance of a more geographically diversified fund.

The funds' yields will change daily based on changes in interest rates and other market conditions. Although each fund is managed to maintain a stable $1.00 share price, there is no guarantee that the fund will be able to do so. For example, a major increase in interest rates or a decrease in the credit quality of the issuer of one of a fund's investments could cause the fund's share price to decrease.

Prospectus

The following factors can significantly affect a fund's performance:

Municipal Market Volatility. Municipal securities can be significantly affected by political changes as well as uncertainties in the municipal market related to taxation, legislative changes, or the rights of municipal security holders. Because many municipal securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care, transportation, and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect the overall municipal market. In addition, changes in the financial condition of an individual municipal insurer can affect the overall municipal market, and market conditions may directly impact the liquidity and valuation of municipal securities.

Interest Rate Changes. Money market securities have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. In general, the price of a money market security can fall when interest rates rise and can rise when interest rates fall. Securities with longer maturities can be more sensitive to interest rate changes. Short-term securities tend to react to changes in short-term interest rates.

Foreign Exposure. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure that are located in foreign countries can involve increased risks. Extensive public information about the provider may not be available and unfavorable political, economic, or governmental developments could affect the value of the security.

<R>Geographic Concentration. California is continuing to experience financial difficulties due to the ongoing economic crisis. The deterioration of California's fiscal situation increases the risk of investing in California municipal securities, including the risk of greater volatility and potential issuer default. Several rating agencies have recently downgraded California's general obligation bond rating. Further downgrades could result in a reduction in the market value of California municipal securities.</R>

Issuer-Specific Changes. Changes in the financial condition of an issuer or counterparty, changes in specific economic or political conditions that affect a particular type of issuer, and changes in general economic or political conditions can increase the risk of default by an issuer or counterparty, which can affect a security's or instrument's credit quality or value. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure also can be affected by these types of changes. Municipal securities backed by current or anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the project or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determines an issuer of a municipal security has not complied with applicable tax requirements, interest from the security could become taxable and the security could decline significantly in value. In addition, if the structure of a security fails to function as intended, interest from the security could become taxable or the security could decline in value.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Generally, each fund purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the opinion of bond counsel, is free from federal income tax and, for Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund, from the federal alternative minimum tax. Neither FMR nor the funds guarantee that this opinion is correct, and there is no assurance that the IRS will agree with bond counsel's opinion. Issuers or other parties generally enter into covenants requiring continuing compliance with federal tax requirements to preserve the tax-free status of interest payments over the life of the security. If at any time the covenants are not complied with, or if the IRS otherwise determines that the issuer did not comply with relevant tax requirements, interest payments from a security could become federally taxable, possibly retroactively to the date the security was issued. For certain types of structured securities, the tax status of the pass-through of tax-free income may also be based on the federal and state tax treatment of the structure.

In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, FMR may temporarily use a different investment strategy (including leaving a significant portion of a fund's assets uninvested) for defensive purposes. Uninvested assets do not earn income for a fund, which may have a significant negative impact on the fund's yield and may prevent the fund from achieving its investment objective. In addition, different factors could affect a fund's performance, and a fund could distribute income subject to federal or California personal income tax.

Fundamental Investment Policies

The following policies are fundamental, that is, subject to change only by shareholder approval:

Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal income tax. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from California personal income tax.

Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal income tax. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from California personal income tax.

Valuing Shares

<R>Each fund is open for business each day the NYSE is open. Even if the NYSE is closed, each fund will be open for business on those days on which the New York Fed is open, the primary trading markets for each fund's portfolio instruments are open, and each fund's management believes there is an adequate market to meet purchase and redemption requests.</R>

Prospectus

Each fund's NAV is the value of a single share. Fidelity normally calculates each fund's NAV as of the close of business of the NYSE, normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. Each fund's assets normally are valued as of this time for the purpose of computing the fund's NAV. Fidelity calculates net asset value separately for each class of shares of a multiple class fund.

NAV is not calculated and a fund will not process purchase and redemption requests submitted on days when the fund is not open for business. The time at which shares are priced and until which purchase and redemption orders are accepted may be changed as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

To the extent that a fund's assets are traded in other markets on days when the fund is not open for business, the value of the fund's assets may be affected on those days. In addition, trading in some of a fund's assets may not occur on days when the fund is open for business.

Each fund's assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost.

Prospectus


Shareholder Information

Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares

General Information

Fidelity Investments was established in 1946 to manage one of America's first mutual funds. Today, Fidelity is the largest mutual fund company in the country, and is known as an innovative provider of high-quality financial services to individuals and institutions.

In addition to its mutual fund business, the company operates one of America's leading brokerage firms, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC. Fidelity is also a leader in providing tax-advantaged retirement plans for individuals investing on their own or through their employer.

You may buy or sell shares of a fund through a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account. If you buy or sell shares of a fund (other than by exchange) through a Fidelity brokerage account, your transactions generally involve your Fidelity brokerage core (a settlement vehicle included as part of your Fidelity brokerage account).

If you do not currently have a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account and would like to invest in a fund, you may need to complete an application. For more information about a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account, please visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com, call 1-800-FIDELITY, or visit a Fidelity Investor Center (call 1-800-544-9797 for the center nearest you).

You may also buy or sell shares of the funds through an investment professional. If you buy or sell shares of a fund through an investment professional, the procedures for buying, selling, and exchanging shares of the fund and the account features and policies may differ from those discussed in this prospectus. Fees in addition to those discussed in this prospectus may also apply. For example, you may be charged a transaction fee if you buy or sell shares of a fund through a non-Fidelity broker or other investment professional.

If the fund is your Fidelity brokerage core, you will pay fees charged in connection with certain activity in your Fidelity brokerage account directly from your fund investment. Please see your Fidelity brokerage account materials for additional information.

You should include the following information with any order to buy, sell, convert, or exchange shares:

  • Your name;
  • Your account number;
  • Name of fund whose shares you want to buy, sell, or convert; and
  • Dollar amount or number of shares you want to buy, sell, or convert.

Certain methods of contacting Fidelity, such as by telephone or electronically, may be unavailable or delayed (for example, during periods of unusual market activity). In addition, the level and type of service available may be restricted based on criteria established by Fidelity.

Prospectus

A fund may reject for any reason, or cancel as permitted or required by law, any purchase or exchange, including transactions deemed to represent excessive trading, at any time.

Excessive trading of fund shares can harm shareholders in various ways, including reducing the returns to long-term shareholders by increasing costs to a fund (such as spreads paid to dealers who sell money market instruments to a fund) and disrupting portfolio management strategies.

FMR anticipates that shareholders will purchase and sell shares of each fund frequently because a money market fund is designed to offer investors a liquid cash option. Accordingly, the Board of Trustees has not adopted policies and procedures designed to discourage excessive trading of money market fund shares and each fund accommodates frequent trading.

A fund may in its discretion restrict, reject, or cancel any purchases or exchanges that, in FMR's opinion, may be disruptive to the management of that fund or otherwise not be in the fund's interests.

Each fund has no limit on purchase or exchange transactions. Each fund reserves the right at any time to restrict purchases or exchanges or impose conditions that are more restrictive on excessive or disruptive trading than those stated in this prospectus.

Buying Shares

The price to buy one share of each fund is its NAV. Each fund's shares are sold without a sales charge.

Your shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after your investment is received in proper form.

Each fund has authorized certain intermediaries to accept orders to buy shares on its behalf. When authorized intermediaries receive an order in proper form, the order is considered as being placed with the fund, and shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after the order is received by the authorized intermediary. Orders by funds of funds for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment manager will be treated as received by the fund at the same time that the corresponding orders are received in proper form by the funds of funds.

There is no minimum balance or purchase minimum for (i) investments through Portfolio Advisory Services, (ii) investments through a mutual fund or a qualified tuition program for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment manager, or (iii) fund positions opened with the proceeds of distributions from a Fidelity systematic withdrawal service. In addition, each fund may waive or lower purchase minimums in other circumstances.

Each fund may stop offering shares completely or may offer shares only on a limited basis, for a period of time or permanently.

If your payment is not received and collected, your purchase may be canceled and you could be liable for any losses or fees a fund or Fidelity has incurred.

Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, purchase orders may be suspended, restricted, or canceled and the monies may be withheld.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

Selling Shares

The price to sell one share of each fund is its NAV.

Your shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form. Normally, redemptions will be processed by the next business day, but it may take up to seven days to pay the redemption proceeds if making immediate payment would adversely affect a fund.

Each fund has authorized certain intermediaries to accept orders to sell shares on its behalf. When authorized intermediaries receive an order in proper form, the order is considered as being placed with the fund, and shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after the order is received by the authorized intermediary. Orders by funds of funds for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment manager will be treated as received by the fund at the same time that the corresponding orders are received in proper form by the funds of funds.

A signature guarantee is designed to protect you and Fidelity from fraud. If you submit your request to Fidelity by mail, Fidelity may require that your request be made in writing and include a signature guarantee in certain circumstances, such as:

  • When you wish to sell more than $100,000 worth of shares;
  • When the address on your account (record address) has changed within the last 15 days or you are requesting that a check be mailed to an address different than the record address;
  • When you are requesting that redemption proceeds be paid to someone other than the account owner; or
  • In certain situations when the redemption proceeds are being transferred to a Fidelity account with a different registration.

You should be able to obtain a signature guarantee from a bank, broker (including Fidelity Investor Centers), dealer, credit union (if authorized under state law), securities exchange or association, clearing agency, or savings association. A notary public cannot provide a signature guarantee.

When you place an order to sell shares, note the following:

  • If you are selling some but not all of your shares, keep your fund balance above the required minimum to keep your fund position open, except fund positions not subject to balance minimums.
  • Redemption proceeds (other than exchanges) may be delayed until money from prior purchases sufficient to cover your redemption has been received and collected. This can take up to seven business days after a purchase.
  • Redemptions may be suspended or payment dates postponed when the NYSE is closed (other than weekends or holidays), when trading on the NYSE is restricted, or as permitted by the SEC.
  • Redemption proceeds may be paid in securities or other property rather than in cash if FMR determines it is in the best interests of a fund.

Prospectus

  • If you hold your shares in a Fidelity mutual fund account and you sell shares by writing a check, if available, and the amount of the check is greater than the value of your fund position, your check will be returned to you and you may be subject to additional charges.
  • You will not receive interest on amounts represented by uncashed redemption checks.
  • If you hold your shares in a Fidelity mutual fund account and your redemption check remains uncashed for more than one year, the check may be invested in additional shares of the fund at the NAV next calculated on the day of the investment.
  • Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, redemption requests may be suspended, restricted, canceled, or processed and the proceeds may be withheld.

To sell shares issued with certificates, call Fidelity for instructions. Each fund no longer issues share certificates.

Converting Shares

You may convert Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares to Institutional Class shares at any time, provided that you meet the eligibility requirements for Institutional Class. You may contact Fidelity by telephone or by mail to request a conversion.

Conversions to Institutional Class shares may not be available if your account is held through an investment professional or other financial intermediary, such as a bank, broker-dealer, insurance company, third-party administrator, or registered investment adviser. Please contact your investment professional or financial intermediary to determine if Institutional Class shares are available and to learn about other rules that may apply.

The fund may conduct periodic reviews of account balances and may convert your Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares to Institutional Class shares if you meet the eligibility requirements for Institutional Class. Automatic conversions between Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares and Institutional Class shares generally are not available to accounts held through investment professionals or other financial intermediaries.

If you no longer meet the minimum balance requirements for Institutional Class, for any reason, the fund may convert your Institutional Class shares to Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares. Investors will be notified in writing before any such conversion to Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares.

A conversion will be based on the respective NAVs of the two classes, without the imposition of any fees, on the trade date of the conversion. A conversion between share classes of the same fund is a non-taxable event.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

Exchanging Shares

An exchange involves the redemption of all or a portion of the shares of one fund and the purchase of shares of another fund.

As a shareholder, you have the privilege of exchanging shares of a fund for shares of other Fidelity funds.

However, you should note the following policies and restrictions governing exchanges:

  • Each fund may refuse any exchange purchase for any reason. For example, each fund may refuse exchange purchases by any person or group if, in FMR's judgment, the fund would be unable to invest the money effectively in accordance with its investment objective and policies, or would otherwise potentially be adversely affected.
  • Before exchanging into a fund, read its prospectus.
  • The fund you are exchanging into must be available for sale in your state.
  • Exchanges may have tax consequences for you.
  • If you are exchanging between accounts that are not registered in the same name, address, and taxpayer identification number (TIN), there may be additional requirements.
  • Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, exchange requests may be suspended, restricted, canceled, or processed and the proceeds may be withheld.

The funds may terminate or modify exchange privileges in the future.

Other funds may have different exchange restrictions and minimums, and may impose redemption fees of up to 2.00% of the amount exchanged. Check each fund's prospectus for details.

Features and Policies

Features

The following features may be available to buy and sell shares of a fund or to move money to and from your account, depending on whether you are investing through a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account. Please visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com or call 1-800-544-6666 for more information.

Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House

  • To transfer money between a bank account and a Fidelity brokerage account or Fidelity mutual fund account.
  • You can use electronic funds transfer to:
- Make periodic (automatic) purchases of Fidelity fund shares or payments to your Fidelity brokerage account.
- Make periodic (automatic) redemptions of Fidelity fund shares or withdrawals from your Fidelity brokerage account.

Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system

  • To transfer money between a bank account and a Fidelity brokerage account or Fidelity mutual fund account.

Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions

  • To directly deposit all or a portion of your compensation from your employer (or the U.S. Government, in the case of Social Security) into a Fidelity brokerage account or Fidelity mutual fund account.
  • To make contributions from a Fidelity mutual fund account to a Fidelity mutual fund IRA.
  • To sell shares of a Fidelity money market fund and simultaneously to buy shares of another Fidelity fund in a Fidelity mutual fund account.

Checkwriting

  • To sell Fidelity fund shares from your Fidelity mutual fund account or withdraw money from your Fidelity brokerage account.

Policies

The following policies apply to you as a shareholder.

Statements that Fidelity sends to you include the following:

  • Confirmation statements (after transactions affecting your fund balance except reinvestment of distributions in the fund or another fund, certain transactions through automatic investment or withdrawal programs, certain transactions that are followed by a monthly account statement, and other transactions in your Fidelity brokerage core).
  • Monthly or quarterly account statements (detailing fund balances and all transactions completed during the prior month or quarter).

To reduce expenses, only one copy of most financial reports and prospectuses may be mailed to households, even if more than one person in a household holds shares of a fund. Call Fidelity at 1-800-544-8544 if you need additional copies of financial reports or prospectuses. If you do not want the mailing of these documents to be combined with those for other members of your household, contact Fidelity in writing at P.O. Box 770001, Cincinnati, Ohio 45277-0002.

Electronic copies of most financial reports and prospectuses are available at Fidelity's web site. To participate in Fidelity's electronic delivery program, call Fidelity or visit Fidelity's web site for more information.

You may initiate many transactions by telephone or electronically. Fidelity will not be responsible for any loss, cost, expense, or other liability resulting from unauthorized transactions if it follows reasonable security procedures designed to verify the identity of the investor. Fidelity will request personalized security codes or other information, and may also record calls. For transactions conducted through the Internet, Fidelity recommends the use of an Internet browser with 128-bit encryption. You should verify the accuracy of your confirmation statements upon receipt and notify Fidelity immediately of any discrepancies in your account activity. If you do not want the ability to sell and exchange by telephone, call Fidelity for instructions.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

You may also be asked to provide additional information in order for Fidelity to verify your identity in accordance with requirements under anti-money laundering regulations. Accounts may be restricted and/or closed, and the monies withheld, pending verification of this information or as otherwise required under these and other federal regulations.

Fidelity may deduct a small balance maintenance fee of $12.00 from a fund balance with a value of less than $2,000 in shares. It is expected that fund balances will be valued after November 1 but prior to December 31 of each calendar year. Fund positions opened after September 30 will not be subject to the fee for that calendar year. The fee, which is payable to Fidelity, is designed to offset in part the relatively higher costs of servicing smaller fund positions. This fee will not be deducted from fund positions opened after January 1 of that calendar year if those positions use regular investment plans.

If your fund balance falls below $2,000 worth of shares for Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund or $10,000 worth of shares for Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund, for any reason and you do not increase your balance, Fidelity may sell all of your shares and send the proceeds to you after providing you with at least 30 days' notice to reestablish the minimum balance. Your shares will be sold at the NAV on the day Fidelity closes your fund position. Certain fund positions are not subject to these balance requirements and will not be closed for failure to maintain a minimum balance.

Fidelity may charge a fee for certain services, such as providing historical account documents.

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

Each fund earns interest, dividends, and other income from its investments, and distributes this income (less expenses) to shareholders as dividends. Each fund may also realize capital gains from its investments, and distributes these gains (less losses), if any, to shareholders as capital gain distributions.

Distributions you receive from each fund consist primarily of dividends. Each fund normally declares dividends daily and pays them monthly.

Earning Dividends

A fund processes purchase and redemption requests only on days it is open for business.

Shares generally begin to earn dividends on the first business day following the day of purchase.

Shares generally earn dividends until, but not including, the next business day following the day of redemption.

Prospectus

Exchange requests will be processed only when both funds are open for business.

Distribution Options

When you open an account, specify on your application how you want to receive your distributions. The following distribution options are available for shares of each fund:

1. Reinvestment Option. Your dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of the fund. If you do not indicate a choice on your application, you will be assigned this option.

2. Cash Option. Your dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, will be paid in cash.

3. Directed Dividends® Option. Your dividends will be automatically invested in shares of another identically registered Fidelity fund. Your capital gain distributions, if any, will be automatically invested in shares of another identically registered Fidelity fund, automatically reinvested in additional shares of the fund, or paid in cash.

If the distribution option you prefer is not listed on your account application, or if you want to change your current distribution option, visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com or call 1-800-544-6666 for more information.

If you elect to receive distributions paid in cash by check and the U.S. Postal Service does not deliver your checks, your distribution option may be converted to the Reinvestment Option. You will not receive interest on amounts represented by uncashed distribution checks.

If your dividend check(s) remains uncashed for more than six months, your check(s) may be invested in additional shares of the fund at the NAV next calculated on the day of the investment.

Tax Consequences

As with any investment, your investment in a fund could have tax consequences for you.

Each fund seeks to earn income and pay dividends exempt from federal income tax and California personal income tax.

A portion of the dividends you receive may be subject to federal, state, or local income tax or, if applicable, may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. You may also receive taxable distributions attributable to a fund's sale of municipal bonds.

For federal tax purposes, certain of each fund's distributions, including distributions of short-term capital gains and gains on the sale of bonds characterized as market discount, are taxable to you as ordinary income, while each fund's distributions of long-term capital gains, if any, are taxable to you generally as capital gains.

For California personal income tax purposes, distributions derived from interest on municipal securities of California issuers and from interest on qualifying securities issued by U.S. territories and possessions are generally exempt from tax. Distributions that are federally taxable as ordinary income or capital gains are generally subject to California personal income tax.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

Any taxable distributions you receive from a fund will normally be taxable to you when you receive them, regardless of your distribution option. If you elect to receive distributions in cash or to invest distributions automatically in shares of another Fidelity fund, you will receive certain December distributions in January, but those distributions will be taxable as if you received them on December 31.

Prospectus


Fund Services

Fund Management

Each fund is a mutual fund, an investment that pools shareholders' money and invests it toward a specified goal.

FMR is each fund's manager. The address of FMR and its affiliates, unless otherwise indicated below, is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

<R>As of December 31, 2009, FMR had approximately $1.3 billion in discretionary assets under management.</R>

As the manager, FMR has overall responsibility for directing each fund's investments and handling its business affairs.

FIMM serves as a sub-adviser for each fund. FIMM has day-to-day responsibility for choosing investments for each fund.

<R>FIMM is an affiliate of FMR. As of December 31, 2009, FIMM had approximately $639.1 billion in discretionary assets under management.</R>

Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC), an affiliate of FMR, was organized in 1986. FRAC serves as a sub-adviser for each fund and may provide investment research and advice for each fund.

Affiliates assist FMR with foreign investments:

  • <R>Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (FMR U.K.), at 10 Paternoster Square, 4th Floor, London, EC4M 7DY, England, serves as a sub-adviser for each fund. As of December 31, 2009, FMR U.K. had approximately $11.3 billion in discretionary assets under management. FMR U.K. may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for each fund.</R>
  • <R>Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.), at Floor 19, 41 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong, serves as a sub-adviser for each fund. As of December 31, 2009, FMR H.K. had approximately $1.8 billion in discretionary assets under management. FMR H.K. may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for each fund.</R>
  • <R>Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc. (FMR Japan), at Kamiyacho Prime Place, 1-17, Toranomon-4-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan, serves as a sub-adviser for each fund. FMR Japan was organized in 2008 to provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States. FMR Japan may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for each fund.</R>
  • <R>FIL Investment Advisors (FIIA), at Pembroke Hall, 42 Crow Lane, Pembroke HM19, Bermuda, serves as a sub-adviser for each fund. As of June 30, 2009, FIIA had approximately $12.8 billion in discretionary assets under management. For each fund, FIIA may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and, in particular, will make minimal credit risk and comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S. dollar-denominated securities.</R>

Prospectus

  • <R>FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd. (FIIA(U.K.)L), at Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, TN11 9DZ, United Kingdom, serves as a sub-adviser for each fund. As of June 30, 2009, FIIA(U.K.)L had approximately $5.3 billion in discretionary assets under management. For each fund, FIIA(U.K.)L may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and, in particular, will make minimal credit risk and comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S. dollar-denominated securities.</R>

From time to time a manager, analyst, or other Fidelity employee may express views regarding a particular company, security, industry, or market sector. The views expressed by any such person are the views of only that individual as of the time expressed and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.

Each fund pays a management fee to FMR. The management fee is calculated and paid to FMR every month. FMR pays all of the other expenses of Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund with limited exceptions.

Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund's annual management fee rate is 0.20% of its average net assets.

For Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund, the fee is calculated by adding a group fee rate to an individual fund fee rate, dividing by twelve, and multiplying the result by the fund's average net assets throughout the month.

The group fee rate is based on the average net assets of all the mutual funds advised by FMR. This rate cannot rise above 0.37%, and it drops as total assets under management increase.

<R>For February 2010, the group fee rate was 0.12% for Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund. The individual fund fee rate is 0.25% for Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund.</R>

<R>The total management fee for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, was 0.37% of the fund's average net assets for Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund. Because Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund's management fee rate may fluctuate, the fund's management fee may be higher or lower in the future.</R>

FMR pays FIMM, FMR U.K., FMR H.K., and FMR Japan for providing sub-advisory services. FMR and its affiliates pay FRAC for providing sub-advisory services. FIMM pays FIIA for providing sub-advisory services, and FIIA in turn pays FIIA(U.K.)L.

The basis for the Board of Trustees approving the management contract and sub-advisory agreements for each fund is available in each fund's annual report for the fiscal period ended February 28, 2010.

Prospectus

Fund Services - continued

FMR may, from time to time, agree to reimburse a fund, or a class of shares of a multiple class fund, as applicable, for management fees and other expenses above a specified limit. FMR retains the ability to be repaid by a fund or class, as applicable, if expenses fall below the specified limit prior to the end of the fiscal year. Reimbursement arrangements, which may be discontinued by FMR at any time, can decrease a fund's or class's expenses and boost its performance.

Effective October 25, 2001, FMR has voluntarily agreed to reimburse Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund to the extent that total operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses, if any), as a percentage of its average net assets, exceed 0.53%. This arrangement may be discontinued by FMR at any time.

Fund Distribution

Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund is composed of multiple classes of shares. All classes of a multiple class fund have a common investment objective and investment portfolio.

FDC distributes each fund's shares.

Intermediaries, including banks, broker-dealers, retirement plan sponsors, administrators, and service-providers (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), may receive from FMR, FDC, and/or their affiliates compensation for providing recordkeeping and administrative services, as well as other retirement plan expenses, and compensation for services intended to result in the sale of fund shares. This compensation may take the form of payments for additional distribution-related activities and/or shareholder services and payments for educational seminars and training, including seminars sponsored by FMR or an affiliate, or by an intermediary. These payments are described in more detail in this section and in the statement of additional information (SAI).

Each fund has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) that recognizes that FMR may use its management fee revenues, as well as its past profits or its resources from any other source, to pay FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of fund shares and/or shareholder support services. FMR, directly or through FDC, may pay significant amounts to intermediaries, such as banks, broker-dealers, retirement plan sponsors, service-providers, and other administrators, that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees of each fund has authorized such payments. Please speak with your investment professional to learn more about any payments his or her firm may receive from FMR, FDC, and/or their affiliates, as well as fees and/or commissions the investment professional charges. You should also consult disclosures made by your investment professional at the time of purchase.

Prospectus

If payments made by FMR to FDC or to intermediaries under a Distribution and Service Plan were considered to be paid out of a fund's or class's assets on an ongoing basis, they might increase the cost of your investment and might cost you more than paying other types of sales charges.

From time to time, FDC may offer special promotional programs to investors who purchase shares of Fidelity funds. For example, FDC may offer merchandise, discounts, vouchers, or similar items to investors who purchase shares of certain Fidelity funds during certain periods. To determine if you qualify for any such programs, contact Fidelity or visit our web site at www.fidelity.com.

No dealer, sales representative, or any other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations, other than those contained in this prospectus and in the related SAI, in connection with the offer contained in this prospectus. If given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the funds or FDC. This prospectus and the related SAI do not constitute an offer by the funds or by FDC to sell shares of the funds to or to buy shares of the funds from any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer.

Prospectus


Appendix

Financial Highlights

<R>The financial highlights tables are intended to help you understand the financial history of each fund's shares for the past 5 years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single share of a fund. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in shares of a fund (assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions). This information has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, whose reports, along with each fund's financial highlights and financial statements, are included in each fund's annual report. A free copy of each annual report is available upon request.</R>

Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

<R>Years ended February 28,

2010

2009

2008 D

2007

2006</R>

<R>Selected Per-Share Data

 

 

 

 

</R>

<R>Net asset value, beginning of period

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00</R>

<R>Income from Investment Operations

 

 

 

 

</R>

<R>Net investment income

.001

.015

.032

.032

.023</R>

<R>Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) E

-

-

-

-

-</R>

<R>Total from investment operations

.001

.015

.032

.032

.023</R>

<R>Distributions from net investment income

(.001)

(.015)

(.032)

(.032)

(.023)</R>

<R>Distributions from net realized gain

-

- E

- E

- E

-</R>

<R>Total distributions

(.001)

(.015)

(.032)

(.032)

(.023)</R>

<R>Net asset value, end of period

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00</R>

<R>Total Return A

.11%

1.50%

3.27%

3.24%

2.34%</R>

<R>Ratios to Average Net Assets B, C

 

 

 

 

</R>

<R>Expenses before reductions

.34%

.32%

.32%

.43%

.43%</R>

<R>Expenses net of fee waivers, if any

.33%

.32%

.31%

.35%

.35%</R>

<R>Expenses net of all reductions

.33%

.29%

.24%

.27%

.27%</R>

<R>Net investment income

.12%

1.55%

3.21%

3.19%

2.34%</R>

<R>Supplemental Data

 

 

 

 

</R>

<R>Net assets, end of period (in millions)

$ 808

$ 1,306

$ 2,022

$ 3,212

$ 2,206</R>

<R>A Total returns would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced during the periods shown.</R>

<R>B Fees and expenses of the underlying Fidelity Central Funds are not included in the Fund's expense ratio. The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of any underlying Fidelity Central Funds.</R>

<R>C Expense ratios reflect operating expenses of the class. Expenses before reductions do not reflect amounts reimbursed or waived or reductions from expense offset arrangements and do not represent the amount paid by the class during periods when reimbursements, waivers or reductions occur. Expenses net of fee waivers reflect expenses after reimbursement and waivers but prior to reductions from expense offset arrangements. Expenses net of all reductions represent the net expenses paid by the class.</R>

<R>D For the year ended February 29.</R>

<R>E Amount represents less than $.001 per share.</R>

Prospectus

Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

<R>Years ended February 28,

2010

2009

2008D

2007

2006</R>

<R>Selected Per-Share Data

 

 

 

 

</R>

<R>Net asset value, beginning of period

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00</R>

<R>Income from Investment Operations

 

 

 

 

</R>

<R>Net investment income

- E

.013

.030

.030

.022</R>

<R>Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) E

-

-

-

-

-</R>

<R>Total from investment operations

- E

.013

.030

.030

.022</R>

<R>Distributions from net investment income

- E

(.013)

(.030)

(.030)

(.022)</R>

<R>Distributions from net realized gain

-

- E

- E

-

-</R>

<R>Total distributions

- E

(.013)

(.030)

(.030)

(.022)</R>

<R>Net asset value, end of period

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00</R>

<R>Total Return A

.04%

1.32%

3.06%

3.09%

2.19%</R>

<R>Ratios to Average Net Assets B, C

 

 

 

 

</R>

<R>Expenses before reductions

.55%

.53%

.51%

.52%

.52%</R>

<R>Expenses net of fee waivers, if any

.44%

.53%

.51%

.52%

.52%</R>

<R>Expenses net of all reductions

.44%

.50%

.41%

.38%

.41%</R>

<R>Net investment income

.04%

1.30%

2.98%

3.05%

2.18%</R>

<R>Supplemental Data

 

 

 

 

</R>

<R>Net assets, end of period (in millions)

$ 5,044

$ 5,761

$ 6,051

$ 4,762

$ 4,096</R>

<R>A Total returns would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced during the periods shown.</R>

<R>B Fees and expenses of the underlying Fidelity Central Funds are not included in the Fund's expense ratio. The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of any underlying Fidelity Central Funds.</R>

<R>C Expense ratios reflect operating expenses of the Fund. Expenses before reductions do not reflect amounts reimbursed or waived or reductions from expense offset arrangements and do not represent the amount paid by the Fund during periods when reimbursements, waivers or reductions occur. Expenses net of fee waivers reflect expenses after reimbursement and waivers but prior to reductions from expense offset arrangements. Expenses net of all reductions represent the net expenses paid by the Fund.</R>

<R>D For the year ended February 29.</R>

<R>E Amount represents less than $.001 per share.</R>

Prospectus

Notes

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT

To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.

For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license.

For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN) and may be requested to provide information on persons with authority or control over the account such as name, residential address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity.

You can obtain additional information about the funds. A description of each fund's policies and procedures for disclosing its holdings is available in the funds' SAI and on Fidelity's web sites. The SAI also includes more detailed information about each fund and its investments. The SAI is incorporated herein by reference (legally forms a part of the prospectus). Each fund's annual and semi-annual reports also include additional information.

For a free copy of any of these documents or to request other information or ask questions about a fund, call Fidelity at 1-800-544-8544. In addition, you may visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com for a free copy of a prospectus, SAI, or annual or semi-annual report or to request other information.

The SAI, the funds' annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the funds, including the funds' SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.

Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number, 811-06397

FDC is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). You may obtain information about SIPC, including the SIPC brochure, by visiting www.sipc.org or calling SIPC at 202-371-8300.

Fidelity, Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design, FAST, and Directed Dividends are registered trademarks of FMR LLC.

The third party marks appearing above are the marks of their respective owners.

<R>1.701535.113 CMS-pro-0410</R>

Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund (FSPXX) and Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund (FCFXX)

Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund is a Class of shares of Fidelity AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

Funds of Fidelity California Municipal Trust II

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

April 29, 2010

This statement of additional information (SAI) is not a prospectus. Portions of each fund's annual reports are incorporated herein. The annual reports are supplied with this SAI.

To obtain a free additional copy of the prospectus or SAI, dated April 29, 2010, or an annual report, please call Fidelity at 1-800-544-8544 or visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com.

(fidelity_logo_graphic)
82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109

<R>CMS-ptb-0410
1.472453.112</R>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PAGE

Investment Policies and Limitations

<Click Here>

Special Considerations Regarding California

<Click Here>

Special Considerations Regarding Puerto Rico

<Click Here>

Portfolio Transactions

<Click Here>

Valuation

<Click Here>

Buying, Selling, and Exchanging Information

<Click Here>

Distributions and Taxes

<Click Here>

Trustees and Officers

<Click Here>

Control of Investment Advisers

<Click Here>

Management Contracts

<Click Here>

Proxy Voting Guidelines

<Click Here>

Distribution Services

<Click Here>

Transfer and Service Agent Agreements

<Click Here>

Description of the Trust

<Click Here>

Financial Statements

<Click Here>

Fund Holdings Information

<Click Here>

Appendix

<Click Here>

INVESTMENT POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS

The following policies and limitations supplement those set forth in the prospectus. Unless otherwise noted, whenever an investment policy or limitation states a maximum percentage of a fund's assets that may be invested in any security or other asset, or sets forth a policy regarding quality standards, such standard or percentage limitation will be determined immediately after and as a result of the fund's acquisition of such security or other asset. Accordingly, any subsequent change in values, net assets, or other circumstances will not be considered when determining whether the investment complies with the fund's investment policies and limitations.

A fund's fundamental investment policies and limitations cannot be changed without approval by a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act)) of the fund. However, except for the fundamental investment limitations listed below, the investment policies and limitations described in this SAI are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

The following are each fund's fundamental investment limitations set forth in their entirety.

Diversification

For each fund:

The fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer, if, as a result, the fund would not comply with any applicable diversification requirements for a money market fund under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules thereunder, as such may be amended from time to time.

Senior Securities

For each fund:

The fund may not issue senior securities, except in connection with the insurance program established by the fund pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission or as otherwise permitted under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Short Sales

For Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund:

The fund may not make short sales of securities (unless it owns or by virtue of its ownership of other securities has the right to obtain securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold).

Margin Purchases

For Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund:

The fund may not purchase any securities on margin.

Borrowing

For each fund:

The fund may not borrow money, except that the fund may borrow money for temporary or emergency purposes (not for leveraging or investment) in an amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings). Any borrowings that come to exceed this amount will be reduced within three days (not including Sundays and holidays) to the extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation.

Underwriting

For each fund:

The fund may not underwrite securities issued by others, except to the extent that the fund may be considered an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in the disposition of restricted securities or in connection with investments in other investment companies.

Concentration

For each fund:

The fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or tax-exempt obligations issued or guaranteed by a U.S. territory or possession or a state or local government, or a political subdivision of any of the foregoing) if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be invested in securities of companies whose principal business activities are in the same industry.

For purposes of each of Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund's and Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund's concentration limitation discussed above, Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) identifies the issuer of a security depending on its terms and conditions. In identifying the issuer, FMR will consider the entity or entities responsible for payment of interest and repayment of principal and the source of such payments; the way in which assets and revenues of an issuing political subdivision are separated from those of other political entities; and whether a governmental body is guaranteeing the security.

For purposes of each of Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund's and Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund's concentration limitation discussed above, FMR may analyze the characteristics of a particular issuer and security and assign an industry or sector classification consistent with those characteristics in the event that the third party classification provider used by FMR does not assign a classification.

Real Estate

For Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund:

The fund may not purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the fund from investing in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or securities of companies engaged in the real estate business).

For Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund:

The fund may not purchase or sell real estate, but this shall not prevent the fund from investing in municipal bonds or other obligations secured by real estate or interests therein.

Commodities

For Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund:

The fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities.

For Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund:

The fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments.

Loans

For each fund:

The fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets would be lent to other parties, but this limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities or to repurchase agreements, or to acquisitions of loans, loan participations or other forms of debt instruments.

Oil, Gas, and Mineral Exploration Programs

For Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund:

The fund may not invest in oil, gas, or other mineral exploration or development programs.

Pooled Funds

For Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund:

The fund may, notwithstanding any other fundamental investment policy or limitation, invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company with substantially the same fundamental investment objective, policies, and limitations as the fund.

For Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund:

The fund may, notwithstanding any other fundamental investment policy or limitation, invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company managed by Fidelity Management & Research Company or an affiliate or successor with substantially the same fundamental investment objective, policies, and limitations as the fund.

The following investment limitations are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

Diversification

For each fund:

With respect to 75% of its total assets, the fund does not currently intend to purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or securities of other money market funds) if, as a result, more than 5% of the fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of that issuer.

For purposes of each fund's diversification limitation discussed above, FMR identifies the issuer of a security depending on its terms and conditions. In identifying the issuer FMR will consider the entity or entities responsible for payment of interest and repayment of principal and the source of such payments; the way in which assets and revenues of an issuing political subdivision are separated from those of other political entities; and whether a governmental body is guaranteeing the security.

For purposes of each fund's diversification limitation discussed above, certain securities subject to guarantees (including insurance, letters of credit and demand features) are not considered securities of their issuer, but are subject to separate diversification requirements, in accordance with industry standard requirements for money market funds.

Short Sales

For Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund:

The fund does not currently intend to sell securities short, unless it owns or has the right to obtain securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold short, and provided that transactions in futures contracts and options are not deemed to constitute selling securities short.

Margin Purchases

For Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund:

The fund does not currently intend to purchase securities on margin, except that the fund may obtain such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of transactions, and provided that margin payments in connection with futures contracts and options on futures contracts shall not constitute purchasing securities on margin.

Borrowing

For each fund:

The fund may borrow money only (a) from a bank or from a registered investment company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment adviser or (b) by engaging in reverse repurchase agreements with any party (reverse repurchase agreements are treated as borrowings for purposes of the fundamental borrowing investment limitation).

Illiquid Securities

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to purchase any security if, as a result, more than 10% of its net assets would be invested in securities that are deemed to be illiquid because they are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale or because they cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued.

For purposes of each fund's illiquid securities limitation discussed above, if through a change in values, net assets, or other circumstances, the fund were in a position where more than 10% of its net assets were invested in illiquid securities, it would consider appropriate steps to protect liquidity.

Loans

For each fund:

The fund does not currently intend to engage in repurchase agreements or make loans, but this limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities.

Pooled Funds

For Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund:

The fund does not currently intend to invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company with substantially the same fundamental investment objective, policies, and limitations as the fund.

For Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund:

The fund does not currently intend to invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company managed by Fidelity Management & Research Company or an affiliate or successor with substantially the same fundamental investment objective, policies, and limitations as the fund.

The following pages contain more detailed information about types of instruments in which a fund may invest, strategies FMR may employ in pursuit of a fund's investment objective, and a summary of related risks. FMR may not buy all of these instruments or use all of these techniques unless it believes that doing so will help a fund achieve its goal.

Affiliated Bank Transactions. A fund may engage in transactions with financial institutions that are, or may be considered to be, "affiliated persons" of the fund under the 1940 Act. These transactions may involve repurchase agreements with custodian banks; short-term obligations of, and repurchase agreements with, the 50 largest U.S. banks (measured by deposits); municipal securities; U.S. Government securities with affiliated financial institutions that are primary dealers in these securities; short-term currency transactions; and short-term borrowings. In accordance with exemptive orders issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Board of Trustees has established and periodically reviews procedures applicable to transactions involving affiliated financial institutions.

Borrowing. Each fund may borrow from banks or from other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates, or through reverse repurchase agreements, and may make additional investments while borrowings are outstanding.

Cash Management. A fund can hold uninvested cash. A municipal fund's uninvested cash may earn credits that reduce fund expenses.

Central Funds are special types of investment vehicles created by Fidelity for use by the Fidelity funds and other advisory clients. FMR uses central funds to invest in particular security types or investment disciplines, or for cash management. Central funds incur certain costs related to their investment activity (such as custodial fees and expenses), but do not pay additional management fees to Fidelity. The investment results of the portions of the fund's assets invested in the central funds will be based upon the investment results of those funds.

Illiquid Securities cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or may be costly to a fund. Under the supervision of the Board of Trustees, FMR determines the liquidity of a fund's investments and, through reports from FMR, the Board monitors investments in illiquid securities. In determining the liquidity of a fund's investments, various factors may be considered, including (1) the frequency and volume of trades and quotations, (2) the number of dealers and prospective purchasers in the marketplace, (3) dealer undertakings to make a market, and (4) the nature of the security and the market in which it trades (including any demand, put or tender features, the mechanics and other requirements for transfer, any letters of credit or other credit enhancement features, any ratings, the number of holders, the method of soliciting offers, the time required to dispose of the security, and the ability to assign or offset the rights and obligations of the security).

Interfund Borrowing and Lending Program. Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC, a fund may lend money to, and borrow money from, other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates; however, municipal funds currently intend to participate in this program only as borrowers. A fund will borrow through the program only when the costs are equal to or lower than the costs of bank loans. Interfund borrowings normally extend overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. Loans may be called on one day's notice. A fund may have to borrow from a bank at a higher interest rate if an interfund loan is called or not renewed.

Inverse Floaters have variable interest rates that typically move in the opposite direction from movements in prevailing short-term interest rate levels - rising when prevailing short-term interest rates fall, and falling when short-term interest rates rise. The prices of inverse floaters can be considerably more volatile than the prices of other investments with comparable maturities and/or credit quality.

Money Market Securities are high-quality, short-term obligations. Money market securities may be structured to be, or may employ a trust or other form so that they are, eligible investments for money market funds. For example, put features can be used to modify the maturity of a security or interest rate adjustment features can be used to enhance price stability. If a structure fails to function as intended, adverse tax or investment consequences may result. Neither the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) nor any other regulatory authority has ruled definitively on certain legal issues presented by certain structured securities. Future tax or other regulatory determinations could adversely affect the value, liquidity, or tax treatment of the income received from these securities or the nature and timing of distributions made by the funds.

Municipal Insurance. A municipal bond may be covered by insurance that guarantees the bond's scheduled payment of interest and repayment of principal. This type of insurance may be obtained by either (i) the issuer at the time the bond is issued (primary market insurance), or (ii) another party after the bond has been issued (secondary market insurance).

Both primary and secondary market insurance guarantee timely and scheduled repayment of all principal and payment of all interest on a municipal bond in the event of default by the issuer, and cover a municipal bond to its maturity, typically enhancing its credit quality and value.

Municipal bond insurance does not insure against market fluctuations or fluctuations in a fund's share price. In addition, a municipal bond insurance policy will not cover: (i) repayment of a municipal bond before maturity (redemption), (ii) prepayment or payment of an acceleration premium (except for a mandatory sinking fund redemption) or any other provision of a bond indenture that advances the maturity of the bond, or (iii) nonpayment of principal or interest caused by negligence or bankruptcy of the paying agent. A mandatory sinking fund redemption may be a provision of a municipal bond issue whereby part of the municipal bond issue may be retired before maturity.

Because a significant portion of the municipal securities issued and outstanding is insured by a small number of insurance companies, not all of which have the highest credit rating, an event involving one or more of these insurance companies could have a significant adverse effect on the value of the securities insured by that insurance company and on the municipal markets as a whole. Ratings of insured bonds reflect the credit rating of the insurer, based on the rating agency's assessment of the creditworthiness of the insurer and its ability to pay claims on its insurance policies at the time of the assessment. While the obligation of a municipal bond insurance company to pay a claim extends over the life of an insured bond, there is no assurance that municipal bond insurers will meet their claims. A higher-than-anticipated default rate on municipal bonds or in connection with other insurance the insurer provides could strain the insurer's loss reserves and adversely affect its ability to pay claims to bondholders.

FMR may decide to retain an insured municipal bond that is in default, or, in FMR's view, in significant risk of default. While a fund holds a defaulted, insured municipal bond, the fund collects interest payments from the insurer and retains the right to collect principal from the insurer when the municipal bond matures, or in connection with a mandatory sinking fund redemption.

Municipal Leases and participation interests therein may take the form of a lease, an installment purchase, or a conditional sale contract and are issued by state and local governments and authorities to acquire land or a wide variety of equipment and facilities. Generally, a fund will not hold these obligations directly as a lessor of the property, but will purchase a participation interest in a municipal obligation from a bank or other third party. A participation interest gives the purchaser a specified, undivided interest in the obligation in proportion to its purchased interest in the total amount of the issue.

Municipal leases frequently have risks distinct from those associated with general obligation or revenue bonds. State constitutions and statutes set forth requirements that states or municipalities must meet to incur debt. These may include voter referenda, interest rate limits, or public sale requirements. Leases, installment purchases, or conditional sale contracts (which normally provide for title to the leased asset to pass to the governmental issuer) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property and equipment without meeting their constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt. Many leases and contracts include "non-appropriation clauses" providing that the governmental issuer has no obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for such purposes by the appropriate legislative body on a yearly or other periodic basis. Non-appropriation clauses free the issuer from debt issuance limitations. If a municipality stops making payments or transfers its obligations to a private entity, the obligation could lose value or become taxable.

Municipal Market Disruption Risk. The value of municipal securities may be affected by uncertainties in the municipal market related to legislation or litigation involving the taxation of municipal securities or the rights of municipal securities holders in the event of a bankruptcy. Proposals to restrict or eliminate the federal income tax exemption for interest on municipal securities are introduced before Congress from time to time. Proposals also may be introduced before the California legislature that would affect the state tax treatment of a municipal fund's distributions. If such proposals were enacted, the availability of municipal securities and the value of a municipal fund's holdings would be affected, and the Trustees would reevaluate the fund's investment objectives and policies. Municipal bankruptcies are relatively rare, and certain provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code governing such bankruptcies are unclear and remain untested. Further, the application of state law to municipal issuers could produce varying results among the states or among municipal securities issuers within a state. These legal uncertainties could affect the municipal securities market generally, certain specific segments of the market, or the relative credit quality of particular securities. Any of these effects could have a significant impact on the prices of some or all of the municipal securities held by a fund, making it more difficult for a fund to maintain a stable net asset value per share (NAV).

Education. In general, there are two types of education-related bonds: those issued to finance projects for public and private colleges and universities, and those representing pooled interests in student loans. Bonds issued to supply educational institutions with funds are subject to the risk of unanticipated revenue decline, primarily the result of decreasing student enrollment or decreasing state and federal funding. Among the factors that may lead to declining or insufficient revenues are restrictions on students' ability to pay tuition, availability of state and federal funding, and general economic conditions. Student loan revenue bonds are generally offered by state (or substate) authorities or commissions and are backed by pools of student loans. Underlying student loans may be guaranteed by state guarantee agencies and may be subject to reimbursement by the United States Department of Education through its guaranteed student loan program. Others may be private, uninsured loans made to parents or students which are supported by reserves or other forms of credit enhancement. Recoveries of principal due to loan defaults may be applied to redemption of bonds or may be used to re-lend, depending on program latitude and demand for loans. Cash flows supporting student loan revenue bonds are impacted by numerous factors, including the rate of student loan defaults, seasoning of the loan portfolio, and student repayment deferral periods of forbearance. Other risks associated with student loan revenue bonds include potential changes in federal legislation regarding student loan revenue bonds, state guarantee agency reimbursement and continued federal interest and other program subsidies currently in effect.

Electric Utilities. The electric utilities industry has been experiencing, and will continue to experience, increased competitive pressures. Federal legislation in the last two years will open transmission access to any electricity supplier, although it is not presently known to what extent competition will evolve. Other risks include: (a) the availability and cost of fuel, (b) the availability and cost of capital, (c) the effects of conservation on energy demand, (d) the effects of rapidly changing environmental, safety, and licensing requirements, and other federal, state, and local regulations, (e) timely and sufficient rate increases, and (f) opposition to nuclear power.

Health Care. The health care industry is subject to regulatory action by a number of private and governmental agencies, including federal, state, and local governmental agencies. A major source of revenues for the health care industry is payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. As a result, the industry is sensitive to legislative changes and reductions in governmental spending for such programs. Numerous other factors may affect the industry, such as general and local economic conditions; demand for services; expenses (including malpractice insurance premiums); and competition among health care providers. In the future, the following elements may adversely affect health care facility operations: adoption of legislation proposing a national health insurance program; other state or local health care reform measures; medical and technological advances which dramatically alter the need for health services or the way in which such services are delivered; changes in medical coverage which alter the traditional fee-for-service revenue stream; and efforts by employers, insurers, and governmental agencies to reduce the costs of health insurance and health care services.

Housing. Housing revenue bonds are generally issued by a state, county, city, local housing authority, or other public agency. They generally are secured by the revenues derived from mortgages purchased with the proceeds of the bond issue. It is extremely difficult to predict the supply of available mortgages to be purchased with the proceeds of an issue or the future cash flow from the underlying mortgages. Consequently, there are risks that proceeds will exceed supply, resulting in early retirement of bonds, or that homeowner repayments will create an irregular cash flow. Many factors may affect the financing of multi-family housing projects, including acceptable completion of construction, proper management, occupancy and rent levels, economic conditions, and changes to current laws and regulations.

Transportation. Transportation debt may be issued to finance the construction of airports, toll roads, highways, or other transit facilities. Airport bonds are dependent on the general stability of the airline industry and on the stability of a specific carrier who uses the airport as a hub. Air traffic generally follows broader economic trends and is also affected by the price and availability of fuel. Toll road bonds are also affected by the cost and availability of fuel as well as toll levels, the presence of competing roads and the general economic health of an area. Fuel costs and availability also affect other transportation-related securities, as do the presence of alternate forms of transportation, such as public transportation.

Water and Sewer. Water and sewer revenue bonds are often considered to have relatively secure credit as a result of their issuer's importance, monopoly status, and generally unimpeded ability to raise rates. Despite this, lack of water supply due to insufficient rain, run-off, or snow pack is a concern that has led to past defaults. Further, public resistance to rate increases, costly environmental litigation, and Federal environmental mandates are challenges faced by issuers of water and sewer bonds.

Put Features entitle the holder to sell a security back to the issuer or a third party at any time or at specified intervals. In exchange for this benefit, a fund may accept a lower interest rate. Securities with put features are subject to the risk that the put provider is unable to honor the put feature (purchase the security). Put providers often support their ability to buy securities on demand by obtaining letters of credit or other guarantees from other entities. Demand features, standby commitments, and tender options are types of put features.

Repurchase Agreements involve an agreement to purchase a security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price. The resale price reflects the purchase price plus an agreed-upon incremental amount which is unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased security. As protection against the risk that the original seller will not fulfill its obligation, the securities are held in a separate account at a bank, marked-to-market daily, and maintained at a value at least equal to the sale price plus the accrued incremental amount. The value of the security purchased may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to purchase the security. In addition, delays or losses could result if the other party to the agreement defaults or becomes insolvent. The funds will engage in repurchase agreement transactions with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR.

Restricted Securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to a fund. Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 Act), or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required, the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a fund sells a security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. The funds will enter into reverse repurchase agreements with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR. Such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of fund assets and a fund's yield and may be viewed as a form of leverage.

Securities of Other Investment Companies, including shares of closed-end investment companies, unit investment trusts, and open-end investment companies, represent interests in professionally managed portfolios that may invest in any type of instrument. Investing in other investment companies involves substantially the same risks as investing directly in the underlying instruments, but may involve additional expenses at the investment company-level, such as portfolio management fees and operating expenses. Certain types of investment companies, such as closed-end investment companies, issue a fixed number of shares that trade on a stock exchange or over-the-counter at a premium or a discount to their NAV. Others are continuously offered at NAV, but may also be traded in the secondary market.

The extent to which a fund can invest in securities of other investment companies may be limited by federal securities laws.

Sources of Liquidity or Credit Support. Issuers may employ various forms of credit and liquidity enhancements, including letters of credit, guarantees, swaps, puts, and demand features, and insurance provided by domestic or foreign entities such as banks and other financial institutions. For purposes of making initial and ongoing minimal credit risk determinations, FMR and its affiliates may rely on their evaluation of the credit of the issuer or the credit of the liquidity or credit enhancement provider. In evaluating the credit of a foreign bank or other foreign entities, factors considered may include whether adequate public information about the entity is available and whether the entity may be subject to unfavorable political or economic developments, currency controls, or other government restrictions that might affect its ability to honor its commitment. Changes in the credit quality of the issuer and/or entity providing the enhancement could affect the value of the security or a fund's share price.

Temporary Defensive Policies. Each fund reserves the right to hold a substantial amount of uninvested cash for temporary, defensive purposes. In addition, Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund reserves the right to invest more than normally permitted in taxable obligations for temporary, defensive purposes.

Tender Option Bonds are created by depositing intermediate- or long-term, fixed-rate or variable rate, municipal bonds into a trust and issuing two classes of trust interests (or "certificates") with varying economic interests to investors. Holders of the first class of trust interests, or floating rate certificates, receive tax-exempt interest based on short-term rates and may tender the certificate to the trust at par. As consideration for providing the tender option, the trust sponsor (typically a bank, broker-dealer, or other financial institution) receives periodic fees. The trust pays the holders of the floating rate certificates from proceeds of a remarketing of the certificates or from a draw on a liquidity facility provided by the sponsor. A fund investing in a floating rate certificate effectively holds a demand obligation that bears interest at the prevailing short-term tax-exempt rate. The floating rate certificate is typically an eligible security for money market funds. Holders of the second class of interests, sometimes called the residual income certificates, are entitled to any tax-exempt interest received by the trust that is not payable to floating rate certificate holders, and bear the risk that the underlying municipal bonds decline in value. In selecting tender option bonds, FMR will consider the creditworthiness of the issuer of the underlying bond deposited in the trust, the experience of the custodian, and the quality of the sponsor providing the tender option. In certain instances, the tender option may be terminated if, for example, the issuer of the underlying bond defaults on interest payments.

Transfer Agent Bank Accounts. Proceeds from shareholder purchases of a fund pass through a series of demand deposit bank accounts before being held at the fund's custodian. Redemption proceeds will pass from the custodian to the shareholder through a similar series of bank accounts.

The bank accounts are registered to the transfer agent or an affiliate, who acts as an agent for the funds when opening, closing and conducting business in the bank accounts. The transfer agent or an affiliate may invest overnight balances in the accounts in repurchase agreements. Any balances that are not invested in repurchase agreements remain in the bank accounts overnight. Any risks associated with these accounts are investment risks of the funds. A fund faces the risk of loss of these balances if the bank becomes insolvent.

Variable and Floating Rate Securities provide for periodic adjustments in the interest rate paid on the security. Variable rate securities provide for a specified periodic adjustment in the interest rate, while floating rate securities have interest rates that change whenever there is a change in a designated benchmark rate or the issuer's credit quality. Some variable or floating rate securities are structured with put features that permit holders to demand payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest from the issuers or certain financial intermediaries.

When-Issued and Forward Purchase or Sale Transactions involve a commitment to purchase or sell specific securities at a predetermined price or yield in which payment and delivery take place after the customary settlement period for that type of security. Typically, no interest accrues to the purchaser until the security is delivered.

When purchasing securities pursuant to one of these transactions, the purchaser assumes the rights and risks of ownership, including the risks of price and yield fluctuations and the risk that the security will not be issued as anticipated. Because payment for the securities is not required until the delivery date, these risks are in addition to the risks associated with a fund's investments. If a fund remains substantially fully invested at a time when a purchase is outstanding, the purchases may result in a form of leverage. When a fund has sold a security pursuant to one of these transactions, the fund does not participate in further gains or losses with respect to the security. If the other party to a delayed-delivery transaction fails to deliver or pay for the securities, a fund could miss a favorable price or yield opportunity or suffer a loss.

A fund may renegotiate a when-issued or forward transaction and may sell the underlying securities before delivery, which may result in capital gains or losses for the fund.

<R>SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA</R>

<R>The following section provides only a summary of (and does not purport to explain, predict, or fully describe) the complex factors, including both economic and political conditions, affecting the financial situation in the State of California (as used in this section, the "State") and is based on information in publicly available documents. This information has not been independently verified. The information provided below is subject to change rapidly, substantially, and without notice, and the inclusion of such information herein shall not under any circumstances create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the State or its issuers since the date of its preparation. Any such change(s) may adversely affect the State's and applicable issuer's cash flows, expenditures, or revenues, or otherwise negatively impact the current or projected State financial situation, which in turn could hamper fund performance.</R>

<R>Further, the marketability, valuation or liquidity of State municipal securities may be negatively affected in the event that State localities or authorities default on their debt obligations or other market events arise, which in turn may negatively affect fund performance, sometimes substantially. Economic and other conditions within the State may affect the credit risk of those localities or authorities to the extent that such localities and authorities are reliant upon State appropriations. In addition, the difficulties encountered by bond insurers in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis and other credit and overall market events may continue to impact municipal securities negatively, and the full effects of these events remain uncertain.</R>

<R>Overview of State Economy. California's economy, the largest among the 50 states, has major components in high technology, trade, entertainment, agriculture, manufacturing, government, tourism, construction, and services. The relative proportion of the various components of the California economy closely resembles the make-up of the national economy, and as a result events which negatively affect such industries may have a similar impact on the State and national economies. </R>

<R>In the Governor's proposed budget for the 2010-11 fiscal year, released on January 8, 2010 (2010-11 Governor's Budget), the California Department of Finance (Department of Finance) projected that the State's economy started to recover from the recession in the latter part of calendar year 2009, but that the State would suffer continued job losses in calendar year 2010. As of December 2009, the State's unemployment rate was 12.4%, compared to 10% for the nation as a whole for the same period. </R>

<R>Current Economic Conditions. Since the start of calendar year 2008, the State has experienced the most significant economic downturn and financial pressure since the Great Depression of the 1930s. As a result of continuing weakness in the State economy, State tax revenues have declined precipitously, resulting in large budget gaps and cash shortfalls. The California Legislature and the California Governor adopted three major budget plans, covering both the 2008-09 and 2009-10 fiscal years, in less than 11 months, utilizing approximately $60 billion in budget solutions, in response to continuing deterioration in the State's fiscal condition. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget estimated a new budget gap of $19.9 billion, of which $6.6 billion is estimated to be attributable to the 2009-10 fiscal year. The major reasons for the new budget gap included continued deterioration of revenues, certain federal and state court decisions, and failure to achieve all the budget solutions and savings expected from previously-enacted budgets. The Governor proposed a large number of steps to close this gap, consisting principally of expenditure reductions, seeking additional aid from the Federal government, various shifts in funding responsibilities and new revenue sources. The Governor declared a fiscal emergency and called a special session of the Legislature beginning January 8, 2010, to address budget solutions. The special session is described in more detail below under "March 2010 Special Session."</R>

<R>The sharp drop in revenues in fiscal years 2008-09 and 2009-10 also resulted in a significant depletion of cash resources to pay the State's obligations. For a period of one month beginning in February 2009, the State deferred making certain payments from the State's General Fund (General Fund) in order to conserve cash resources for high priority obligations, such as education and debt service. As new budget gaps were identified, the State's cash resources became so depleted that, commencing July 2, 2009, the State Controller (Controller) began to issue registered warrants (IOUs) for certain lower priority obligations in lieu of checks which could be immediately cashed. In late August 2009, the state called all $2.6 billion of its outstanding IOUs for redemption on September 4, 2009. This was only the second issuance of IOUs by the State since the 1930s. </R>

<R>The 2010-11 Governor's Budget and the Controller projected continuing cash pressures during fiscal year 2010-11. Legislation enacted during the fiscal emergency special session in early March 2010 may provide the State with authority to defer certain payments to help the State avoid cash flow difficulties during the 2010-11 fiscal year. However, absent further corrective action by the Legislature and timely adoption of a fiscal year 2010-11 budget, a cash flow shortage in fiscal year 2010-11 may require the issuance of IOUs. </R>

<R>There can be no assurances that the fiscal stress and cash pressures currently facing the state will not continue or become more difficult, or that continuing declines in State tax receipts or other impacts of the current economic situation will not further materially adversely affect the financial condition of the State. The Department of Finance projects that multi-billion dollar budget gaps will occur annually though at least fiscal year 2013-14 without further corrective action.</R>

<R>In addition, the pension funds managed by the State's principal retirement systems, the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the California State Teachers' Retirement System, have sustained significant investment losses during the economic downturn and face unfunded actuarial liabilities which will require increased contributions from the General Fund in future years. The State also has an unfunded liability relating to retirees' post-employment healthcare benefits which is estimated to be $51.8 billion as of June 30, 2009.</R>

<R>The expenditure reductions and extraordinary pressures on the State budget in recent years have resulted in continuing fiscal pressures on local governments throughout the State. Several years of budget borrowing from transportation funds have left many State and local transportation construction projects without adequate funds. The current economic slowdown and projected reductions in State aid have left many local governments with substantial budget deficits, resulting in reductions in payroll and services.</R>

<R>There is no assurance that any California issuer will make full or timely payments of principal or interest or remain solvent. It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local California issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the State, and there is no obligation on the part of the State to make payment on such local obligations in the event of default.</R>

<R>The economic forecasts of the Department of Finance, the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO), and the Controller are prepared using national economic activity forecasts; major national and California economic indicators; revenue estimates; legislative, judicial and administrative changes; and recent cash results.</R>

<R>General Risks. Many complex political, social, and economic factors influence the State's economy and finances. Such factors may affect the State's budget unpredictably from year to year. Such factors include, but are not limited to: (i) the performance of the national and State economies; (ii) the receipt of revenues below projections; (iii) a delay in or an inability of the State to implement budget solutions as a result of current or future litigation; (iv) an inability to implement all planned expenditure reductions; and (v) actions taken by the Federal government, including audits, disallowances, and changes in aid levels.</R>

<R>These factors are continually changing, and no assurances can be given with respect to how these factors or other factors will materialize in the future or what impact they will have on the State's fiscal and economic condition. Such factors could have an adverse impact on the State budget in the current year and could result in declines, possibly severe, in the value of the State's and municipal issuers' outstanding obligations, increases in their future borrowing costs, and impairment of their ability to pay debt service on their obligations.</R>

<R>Recent Events in the Municipal Bond Market. A significant number of auction rate municipal bonds have failed to attract buyers, resulting in "failed auctions" and a resetting of the periodic rates to rates in excess of those which would otherwise prevail in the short-term market. The failed auctions have affected municipal issuers throughout the United States and its territories and reflect concerns relating to bond insurers that have insured those bonds as well as changes in the operation of the auction rate itself. As a result of these failed auctions, governmental issuers are experiencing significantly higher debt service costs on auction rate bonds and bondholders are experiencing less liquidity than had been anticipated. The duration of the disruption in the auction rate securities market cannot be predicted at this time. In addition, the value of municipal securities may be difficult to measure in the current or a future market environment, as current valuation, significantly affected by external forces, may not reflect the intrinsic, underlying value of State municipal securities. Should the State or municipalities fail to sell bonds when and at the rates projected, the State could experience significantly increased costs in the General Fund and a weakened overall cash position in the current fiscal year.</R>

<R>Constitutional Limitations on Taxes, Other Charges and Appropriations.</R>

<R>Limitation on Property Taxes. Certain California debt obligations may be obligations of issuers which rely in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, on ad valorem property taxes as a source of revenue. The taxing powers of California local governments and districts are limited by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1978 and commonly known as "Proposition 13." Briefly, Article XIIIA limits the rate of ad valorem property taxes to 1% of full cash value of real property and generally restricts the reassessment of property to 2% per year, except upon new construction or change of ownership (subject to a number of exemptions). Taxing entities may, however, raise ad valorem taxes above the 1% limit to pay debt service on voter-approved bonded indebtedness.</R>

<R>Under Article XIIIA, the basic 1% ad valorem tax levy is applied against the assessed value of property as of the owner's date of acquisition (or as of March 1, 1975, if acquired earlier), subject to certain adjustments. This system has resulted in widely varying amounts of tax on similarly situated properties. Several lawsuits were filed challenging the acquisition-based assessment system of Proposition 13, but it was upheld by the United States Supreme Court in 1992.</R>

<R>Article XIIIA prohibits local governments from raising revenues through ad valorem taxes above the 1% limit; it also requires voters of any governmental unit to give two-thirds approval to levy any "special tax" (a tax devoted to a specific purpose). </R>

<R>Limitations on Other Taxes, Fees and Charges. On November 5, 1996, the voters of the State approved Proposition 218, called the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act." Proposition 218 added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the State Constitution, which contain a number of provisions affecting the ability of local agencies to levy and collect both existing and future taxes, assessments, fees and charges.</R>

<R>Article XIIIC requires that all new or increased local taxes be submitted to the voters before they become effective. Taxes for general governmental purposes require a majority vote and taxes for specific purposes require a two-thirds vote.</R>

<R>Article XIIID contains several provisions which make it generally more difficult for local agencies to levy and maintain "assessments" for municipal services and programs. Article XIIID also contains several provisions affecting "fees" and "charges", defined for purposes of Article XIIID to mean "any levy other than an ad valorem tax, a special tax, or an assessment, imposed by a local government upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including a user fee or charge for a property related service." All new and existing property related fees and charges must conform to requirements prohibiting, among other things, fees and charges which generate revenues exceeding the funds required to provide the property related service or are used for unrelated purposes. Article XIIID contains notice, hearing and protest procedures for levying or increasing property related fees and charges, and, except for fees or charges for sewer, water and refuse collection services (or fees for electrical and gas service, which are not treated as "property related" for purposes of Article XIIID), no property related fee or charge may be imposed or increased without majority approval by the property owners subject to the fee or charge or, at the option of the local agency, two-thirds voter approval by the electorate residing in the affected area.</R>

<R>In addition to the provisions described above, Article XIIIC removes limitations on the initiative power in matters of local taxes, assessments, fees and charges. Consequently, local voters could, by future initiative, repeal, reduce or prohibit the future imposition or increase of any local tax, assessment, fee or charge. It is unclear how this right of local initiative may be used in cases where taxes or charges have been or will be specifically pledged to secure debt issues.</R>

<R>The interpretation and application of Proposition 218 will ultimately be determined by the courts with respect to a number of matters, and it is not possible at this time to predict with certainty the outcome of such cases.</R>

<R>Appropriations Limits. The State and its local governments are subject to an annual "appropriations limit" imposed by Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1979 and significantly amended by Propositions 98 and 111 in 1988 and 1990, respectively. Article XIIIB prohibits the State or any covered local government from spending "appropriations subject to limitation" in excess of the appropriations limit imposed. "Appropriations subject to limitation" are authorizations to spend "proceeds of taxes," which consist of tax revenues and certain other funds, including proceeds from regulatory licenses, user charges or other fees, to the extent that such proceeds exceed the cost of providing the product or service, but "proceeds of taxes" exclude most State subventions to local governments. No limit is imposed on appropriations of funds which are not "proceeds of taxes," such as reasonable user charges or fees, and certain other non-tax funds, including bond proceeds.</R>

<R>Among the expenditures not included in the Article XIIIB appropriations limit are: (i) the debt service cost of bonds issued or authorized prior to January 1, 1979, or subsequently authorized by the voters, (ii) appropriations to comply with mandates of courts or the federal government, (iii) appropriations for certain capital outlay projects, (iv) appropriations by the State of post-1989 increases in gasoline taxes and vehicle weight fees, and (v) appropriations made in certain cases of emergency.</R>

<R>The appropriations limit for each year is adjusted annually to reflect changes in cost of living and population, and any transfers of service responsibilities between government units. The definitions for such adjustments were liberalized in 1990 to follow more closely growth in the State's economy.</R>

<R>"Excess" revenues are measured over a two year cycle. Local governments must return any excess to taxpayers by rate reductions. The State must refund 50% of any excess, with the other 50% paid to schools and community colleges. Local governments may by voter approval exceed their spending limits for up to four years.</R>

<R>According to the Department of Finance, the State was approximately $16.9 billion and $31.6 billion below the appropriations limit in fiscal years 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively. The Department of Finance estimates that the State will be approximately $23.1 billion and $20.8 billion below its appropriations limit in fiscal years 2009-10 and 2010-11, respectively.</R>

<R>Because of the complex nature of Articles XIIIA, XIIIB, XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution, the ambiguities and possible inconsistencies in their terms, and the impossibility of predicting future appropriations or changes in population and cost of living, and the probability of continuing legal challenges, it is not currently possible to determine fully the impact of these Articles on California debt obligations or on the ability of the State or local governments to pay debt service on such California debt obligations. It is not possible, at the present time, to predict the outcome of any pending litigation with respect to the ultimate scope, impact or constitutionality of these Articles or the impact of any such determinations upon State agencies or local governments, or upon their ability to pay debt service on their obligations. Further initiatives or legislative changes in laws or the California Constitution may also affect the ability of the State or local issuers to repay their obligations.</R>

<R>Obligations of the State. The State Treasurer (Treasurer) is responsible for the sale of most debt obligations of the State and its various authorities. </R>

<R>General Obligation Bonds. General obligation bonds are typically authorized for infrastructure and other capital improvements at the State and local level. Under the California Constitution, debt service on outstanding general obligation bonds is the second charge to the General Fund after support of the public school system and public institutions of higher education. </R>

<R>As of February 1, 2010, the State had outstanding approximately $72.9 billion aggregate principal amount of long-term general obligation bonds, of which approximately $63.4 billion were payable primarily from the General Fund, and approximately $9.5 billion were self-liquidating bonds payable first from other special revenue funds. As of February 1, 2010, there were unused voter authorizations for the future issuance of approximately $48.8 billion of long-term general obligation bonds, some of which may be first issued as commercial paper notes. Of this unissued amount, approximately $1.3 billion is for general obligation bonds payable first from other revenue sources.</R>

<R>General Fund Debt Ratio. Between November 2006 and August 2009, voters and the legislature authorized more than $60 billion of new general obligation bonds and lease revenue bonds, which are paid solely from the General Fund. This new authorization substantially increased the current amount of such General Fund-supported debt outstanding to more than $72 billion, while still leaving authorized and unissued approximately $58 billion of such bonds as of February 1, 2010. In order to address the expenditure needs for these new authorizations, along with those which existed prior to 2006, the State increased the volume of issuance of both of these categories of bonds substantially, compared to previous years, starting in fiscal year 2007-08. </R>

<R>Disruptions in the financial markets and uncertainties about the State's budget condition caused significant disruptions in the State's bond issuance program during fiscal year 2008-09. Because of these factors, the State did not issue any new general obligation bonds between July 2008 and March 2009. In March 2009, the State issued $6.54 billion of new tax-exempt bonds, the largest new money general obligation bond issue in the State's history (excluding Economic Recovery Bonds (ERBs)). A few weeks later, the State issued $6.86 billion of federally taxable general obligation bonds in reliance on new federal rules. A significant part of the revenue raised from these offerings was used to retire internal borrowings that had been used to fund construction projects. An additional $6.546 billion of tax exempt and taxable general obligation bonds were issued in the fall of 2009, together with $1.549 billion of lease revenue bonds. </R>

<R>Although a record of approximately $20 billion of general obligation bonds was offered during calendar year 2009, the scale of issuances is projected to be much lower in calendar year 2010. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget projects issuance of approximately $13.2 billion of general obligation and lease revenue bonds in fiscal year 2010-11. </R>

<R>In light of the drop in General Fund revenues since fiscal year 2007-08, and the projections of new bond sales in the future, the ratio of debt service on general obligation, lease revenue, and Proposition 1A bonds supported by the General Fund to annual General Fund revenues and transfers (General Fund Debt Ratio) is expected to increase in future years. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget estimates that in fiscal year 2009-10, the General Fund Debt Ratio is estimated to equal approximately 6.91%. Through fiscal year 2013-14, the State's General Fund Debt Ratio is projected to peak at 10.47% in fiscal year 2012-2013, the year that the Proposition 1A bonds mature. </R>

<R>The deterioration of the State's fiscal situation increases the risk of investing in California municipal securities, including the risk of potential issuer default, and also heightens the risk that the prices of California municipal securities held by a fund will experience greater volatility. </R>

<R>Non-Recourse Obligations. Certain State agencies and authorities issue obligations secured or payable from specified revenue streams, including transportation projects, various public works projects, and public and private educational facilities. These obligations are not payable from the General Fund and carry different ratings than the State's general obligation bonds. State agencies and authorities had approximately $56 billion aggregate principal amount of revenue bonds and notes which are non-recourse to the General Fund outstanding as of December 31, 2009. None of these revenue bonds is backed by the State's faith and credit or taxing power.</R>

<R>Obligations of Other Issuers.</R>

<R>Other Issuers of California Debt Obligations. There are a number of State agencies, instrumentalities and political subdivisions of the State that issue municipal obligations, some of which may be conduit revenue obligations payable from payments from private borrowers. These entities are subject to various economic risks and uncertainties, and the credit quality of the securities issued by them may vary considerably from the credit quality of obligations backed by the full faith and credit of the State.</R>

<R>State Assistance. Property tax revenues received by local governments declined more than 50% following passage of Proposition 13. Subsequently, the Legislature enacted measures to provide for the redistribution of the General Fund's surplus to local agencies, the reallocation of certain State revenues to local agencies and the assumption of certain governmental functions by the State to assist municipal issuers to raise revenues. Total local assistance from the General Fund has been budgeted at approximately 75% of General Fund expenditures in recent years, including the effect of implementing reductions in certain aid programs. To reduce State General Fund support for school districts, the 1992-93 and 1993-94 Budget Acts caused local governments to transfer $3.9 billion of property tax revenues to school districts, representing loss of the post-Proposition 13 "bailout" aid. Local governments have in return received greater revenues and greater flexibility to operate health and welfare programs. </R>

<R>The enactment of Proposition 1A in November 2004 substantially changed the ability of the State to use local government taxing sources to aid the State budget. See "State-Local Fiscal Relations" below. </R>

<R>In 1997, a new program provided for the State to substantially take over funding for local trial courts (saving cities and counties some $400 million annually). In recent years, the State has provided over $350 million to support local law enforcement costs.</R>

<R>To the extent the State should be constrained by its Article XIIIB appropriations limit, or its obligation to conform to Proposition 98, or other fiscal considerations, the absolute level, or the rate of growth, of State assistance to local governments may continue to be reduced. Any such reductions in State aid could compound the serious fiscal constraints already experienced by many local governments, particularly counties. The recent economic slowdown in the State, with its corresponding reduction in State and local revenues, will put additional pressure on local government finances in the coming years.</R>

<R>Counties and cities may face further budgetary pressures as a result of changes in welfare and public assistance programs, which were enacted in August, 1997 in order to comply with the federal welfare reform law. Generally, counties play a large role in the new system, and are given substantial flexibility to develop and administer programs to bring aid recipients into the workforce. Counties are also given financial incentives if either at the county or Statewide level, the "Welfare-to-Work" programs exceed minimum targets; counties are also subject to financial penalties for failure to meet such targets. Counties remain responsible to provide "general assistance" for able-bodied indigents who are ineligible for other welfare programs.</R>

<R>Local governments are facing substantial increases in future pension liabilities and health care costs for retirees, and increases in current contribution rates, as a result of (a) generous new retirements benefits granted to employees during recent economic boom times, and (b) reduced earnings resulting from stock market declines.</R>

<R>Assessment Bonds. California assessment bonds may be adversely affected by a general decline in real estate values or a slowdown in real estate sales activity. In many cases, such bonds are secured by land which is undeveloped at the time of issuance but anticipated to be developed within a few years after issuance. In the event of such reduction or slowdown, such development may not occur or may be delayed, thereby increasing the risk of a default on the bonds. Because the special assessments or taxes securing these bonds are not the personal liability of the owners of the property assessed, the lien on the property is the only security for the bonds. Moreover, in most cases the issuer of these bonds is not required to make payments on the bonds in the event of delinquency in the payment of assessments or taxes, except from amounts, if any, in a reserve fund established for the bonds.</R>

<R>California Long-Term Lease Obligations. Based on a series of court decisions, certain long-term lease obligations, though typically payable from the general fund of the State or a municipality, are not considered "indebtedness" requiring voter approval. Such leases, however, are subject to "abatement" in the event the facility being leased is unavailable for beneficial use and occupancy by the municipality during the term of the lease. Abatement is not a default, and there may be no remedies available to the holders of the certificates evidencing the lease obligation in the event abatement occurs. The most common cases of abatement are failure to complete construction of the facility before the end of the period during which lease payments have been capitalized and uninsured casualty losses to the facility (e.g., due to earthquake). In the event abatement occurs with respect to a lease obligation, lease payments may be interrupted (if all available insurance proceeds and reserves are exhausted) and the certificates may not be paid when due. Although litigation is brought from time to time which challenges the constitutionality of such lease arrangements, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling in August, 1998 which reconfirmed the legality of these financing methods.</R>

<R>2009-10 Budget.</R>

<R>Background. The State's budget for fiscal year 2009-10 was enacted in an unusual sequence. The Budget Act for the 2008-09 fiscal year (2008 Budget Act) was one of the latest ever enacted, having been delayed until mid-September 2008 as the result of the difficulty balancing the budget with reduced revenues, as declining economic conditions were already evident. The 2008 Budget Act, however, was based on revenue assumptions made in the spring of 2008, which proved to be overstated by the time the actual revenue results for September 2008 and October 2008 were received. With the financial market deterioration in September 2008, which resulted in massive federal assistance and caused large drops in stock market and other asset values and reductions in consumer spending, projections of tax revenues, which are heavily dependent on capital gains taxes and sales taxes, had to be dramatically reduced. In November 2008, the Governor announced that the 2008-09 fiscal year budget would be billions of dollars out of balance, and called several special sessions of the Legislature to enact corrective actions. </R>

<R>A compromise was not reached until February 2009. At that time, the February 2009 Budget Package was enacted, which included modifications to the 2008 Budget Act and the enactment, more than four months early, of a full budget act for fiscal year 2009-10. </R>

<R>Initial 2009 Budget Act. The Initial 2009 Budget Act was adopted by the Legislature on February 19, 2009, along with a number of implementing measures, and signed by the Governor on February 20, 2009. The Initial 2009 Budget Act enacted $36 billion in solutions to what was then estimated to be a $42 billion General Fund budget gap. It also provided for five budget-related measures that would have provided an estimated $6 billion in additional budget solutions. However, these measures were all rejected by voters at a May 19, 2009 special election.</R>

<R>After adoption of the Initial 2009 Budget Act, the State continued to experience significant declines in revenues and other financial pressures. On May 14, 2009, the Governor released a revision to the Initial 2009 Budget Act. Together with subsequent revisions, the 2009-10 May Revision identified further budget shortfalls through the 2009-10 fiscal year of approximately $24 billion. </R>

<R>Amended 2009 Budget Act. On July 24, 2009, the Legislature approved amendments to the Initial 2009 Budget Act and the Governor signed the Amended 2009 Budget Act on July 28, 2009. The Amended 2009 Budget Act included another $24 billion in solutions designed to address the further deterioration of the State's fiscal situation identified in the 2009-10 May Revision. </R>

<R>Under the Amended 2009 Budget Act, General Fund revenues and transfers were projected to increase 6.4%, from a revised $84.1 billion in fiscal year 2008-09 to $89.5 billion in fiscal year 2009-10. A significant element of this increase was projected to come from certain new revenue sources implemented in February 2008. The Amended 2009 Budget Act contained General Fund appropriations of $84.6 billion in fiscal year 2009-10, compared to $91.5 billion in fiscal year 2008-09, a 7.5% decrease. The June 30, 2010 total reserve was projected to be $500 million as compared to the revised June 30, 2009 reserve of negative $4.5 billion. </R>

<R>2010-11 Proposed Governor's Budget. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget, released on January 8, 2010, revises various revenue and expenditure estimates for fiscal year 2009-10 and proposes to solve the estimated $19.9 billion budget gap by the end of fiscal year 2010-11 with a combination of spending reductions, alternative funding, fund shifts, and additional federal funds. </R>

<R>Fiscal Year 2009-10 Revised Estimates in the 2010-11 Governor's Budget. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget revised various revenue and expenditures estimates for fiscal year 2009-10. It projects that the State will end fiscal year 2009-10 with a negative reserve of $5.4 billion, compared to the estimate of $500 million reserve at the time of the Amended 2009 Budget Act. </R>

<R>The 2010-11 Governor's Budget reflects a net decrease of $2.476 billion in revenues available from prior years at the start of fiscal year 2009-10. As of the 2010-11 Governor's Budget, General Fund revenues and transfers for fiscal year 2009-10 are projected to be $88.1 billion, a decrease of $1.457 billion compared with Amended 2009 Budget Act estimates. Also under the 2010-11 Governor's Budget, General Fund expenditures for fiscal year 2009-10 are projected at $86.1 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion compared with the Amended Budget Act estimates. This increase in expenditures (which is net of a decrease in Proposition 98 expenditures) is primarily attributable to increases in health and human service expenditures of $266.8 million; increases in prison expenditures of $906.6 million; and elimination of General Fund reimbursement of $81.6 million for transportation-related costs as a result of an adverse court decision which invalidated the use of Proposition 42 moneys for that purpose. </R>

<R>The 2010-11 Governor's Budget projects to end fiscal year 2010-11 with a $1.0 billion reserve. General Fund revenues and transfers for fiscal year 2010-11 are projected at $89.3 billion, and General Fund expenditures for fiscal year 2010-11 are projected at $82.9 billion. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget proposes a combined total of $19.9 billion of budget solutions for fiscal years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The solutions consist of $8.5 billion in expenditure restrictions (approximately 42.7% of the total solutions), $6.9 billion in federal funds solutions (approximately 34.7% of the total solutions), $3.9 billion in alternative funding solutions (approximately 19.6% of the total solutions), and $572 million in fund shifts and other revenues (approximately 2.8% of the total solutions). </R>

<R>Expenditure restrictions include $1.07 billion of reductions relating to Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid program); $1.0 billion in reductions relating to in-home supportive services; $1.63 billion in salary reductions; $2.43 billion reduction in Proposition 98 funding and $1.1 billion in reductions relating to prison and corrections expenditures. Alternative funding sources include $986 million relating to a gas tax shift; the use of $550 million in Proposition 10 moneys to offset General Fund expenditures for children's programs; and the use of $452 million of Proposition 63 moneys to offset General Fund expenditures for mental health programs. The use of Proposition 10 and Proposition 63 moneys described above require voter approval at the June 2010 primary election or November 2010 general election. </R>

<R>LAO Report. On January 12, 2010, the LAO released its analysis of the 2010-11 Governor's Budget (LAO Report). In reaching its conclusions, the LAO performs an independent assessment of the outlook for California's economy, demographics, revenues, and expenditures. The LAO Report states that the reasons for the State's current budget gap are similar to prior budget shortfalls: the inability of the State to achieve proposed budget solutions; the effects of adverse court decisions, and, for fiscal year 2010-11, the expiration of various one-time and temporary budget solutions approved in 2009. </R>

<R>The LAO Report expresses caution regarding the 2010-11 Governor's Budget due to certain risks, including the improbability of the United States Legislature agreeing to all of the Governor's requests for federal funds, and states that the California Legislature needs to operate on the assumption that federal government relief will total billions of dollars less than what the 2010-11 Governor's Budget assumes. </R>

<R>March 2010 Special Session. On January 8, 2010, concurrently with the submission of the 2010-11 Governor's Budget, the Governor declared a fiscal emergency and called the Legislature into a fiscal emergency special session. The nature of the fiscal emergency was the projected budget imbalance for fiscal year 2009-10 and the projected insufficient cash reserves and budgetary and cash deficits in fiscal year 2010-11. The purpose of the special session was for the Legislature to consider and act upon legislation included in the 2010-11 Governor's Budget that would close $8.9 billion of the budget gap. Delays in the adoption of the gap-closing proposals contained in the 2010-11 Governor's Budget until the enactment of the fiscal year 2010-11 budget would result in the loss of a portion of the proposed budgetary solutions and thereby necessitate more cuts in fiscal year 2010-11. </R>

<R>As of March 5, 2010, the Legislature had passed legislation intended to reduce the budget gap by about $3.2 billion. About $2.1 billion of the savings was intended to be obtained through expenditure reductions accomplished through appropriations targeted in fiscal year 2010-11. These intended reductions principally involved prison healthcare costs and employee compensation savings. On March 8, 2010, the Governor vetoed this $2.1 billion in savings. The remaining $1.1 billion of proposed solutions may be achieved through legislation intended to reduce the sales tax on gasoline and replace it with a higher excise tax, a portion of which would be applied to offset General Fund costs for certain transportation expenses. As of March 12, 2010, this legislation is still under consideration by the Governor, who has not indicated whether he will sign the bill. The special session ended on March 11, 2010.</R>

<R>As required by State law, the Governor will update the 2010-11 Governor's Budget by May 14, 2010. This updated budget (May Revision) will be the basis for the final negotiations between the governor and the Legislature to reach agreement on the fiscal year 2010-11 budget. </R>

<R>Balanced Budget Amendment. On March 2, 2004, voters approved Proposition 58, a constitutional amendment called the "Balanced Budget Amendment," which affects future State budgeting procedures. This amendment was linked to Proposition 57, also approved by the voters, which authorized issuance of $15 billion of long-term general obligation bonds, additionally secured by a 1/4 cent increment of the State's sales tax, which can be used to eliminate the accumulated budget deficits through June 30, 2004 and certain additional obligations incurred by the State.</R>

<R>The Balanced Budget Amendment requires the Legislature to enact a budget bill in which General Fund expenditures do not exceed estimated General Fund revenues and available reserves. After passage of the budget act, if the Governor determines that the State is facing substantial revenue shortfalls or spending deficiencies, the Governor may declare a fiscal emergency and propose legislation to address the emergency. The Legislature would be called in to special session to address this proposal. If the Legislature fails to send legislation to the Governor to address the fiscal emergency within 45 days, it will be prohibited from acting on any other bills or adjourning until fiscal legislation is passed. The Governor declared several such fiscal emergencies in 2008 and called the Legislature into various special sessions to address the recent current budget shortfall.</R>

<R>The Amendment also created a "rainy day" reserve called the Budget Stabilization Account ("BSA") in the State General Fund. Beginning in the 2006-07 fiscal year, a portion of estimated annual General Fund revenues are transferred by the Controller into the BSA not later than September 30 of each year. The transfer begins at 1% of revenues, and increases annually to reach a level of 3%. The initial transfers of $944 million and $2.045 billion took place in September 2006 and September 2007. The transfers are expected to continue until the BSA reaches a balance of the greater of $8 billion or 5% of General Fund revenue. Moneys in the BSA may be used to make up for unexpected budget imbalances, but will then have to be replenished with future transfers until the target level is reached. The annual transfer can be suspended by the Governor by an executive order issued not later than June 1 of the preceding fiscal year. The Amendment requires that one half of the BSA deposits, up to an aggregate of $5 billion, shall be transferred to the State Treasurer to provide for early redemption of the economic recovery bonds approved by Proposition 57. A total of $1.495 billion was transferred to retire economic recovery bonds in fiscal year 2006-07 ($472 million) and 2007-08 ($1.023 billion). The Governor suspended both the fiscal years 2008-09 and 2009-10 BSA transfers due to the condition of the General Fund, and the 2010-11 Governor's Budget assumes another suspension for fiscal year 2010-11.</R>

<R>A final provision of the Amendment prohibits future long-term bond issuances for the purpose of funding budget deficits once the bonds authorized by Proposition 57 are issued. Short term borrowing for cash flow management will continue to be authorized.</R>

<R>State-Local Fiscal Relations. In November, 2004, voters approved Proposition 1A, which made significant changes to the fiscal relationship between the State and local governments. In return for a $2.6 billion contribution to State budgets in the 2004-05 and 2005-06 fiscal years, Proposition 1A prohibits the State from accessing local governments' property tax, sales tax and vehicle license fee revenues except under limited circumstances. Starting in the 2008-09 fiscal year the State can borrow up to 8% of local property tax revenues but only if the Governor declares a fiscal hardship and with 2/3 approval of each house of the Legislature. This amount must be repaid within three years, and such borrowing can only be made twice in any ten-year period. In addition, the State cannot reduce the local sales tax rate or restrict authority of local governments to impose or change the distribution of the statewide local sales tax. Proposition 1A also strengthens requirements for the State to reimburse local governments if it enacts certain kinds of laws which mandate increased local spending. Proposition 1A is intended to produce greater certainty for local governments, but will reduce the State's options for dealing with budget shortfalls in the future.</R>

<R>The Amended 2009 Budget Act authorized the State to exercise its Proposition 1A borrowing authority. This borrowing generated $1.998 billion that will be used to offset General Fund costs for a variety of court, health, corrections, and K-12 programs. The enabling legislation also created a securitization mechanism for local governments to sell their right to receive the State's payment obligations to local government-operated joint powers agency (JPA). This JPA sold bonds in an aggregate amount of $1.895 billion in November 2009 to pay the local agencies their property tax allocations when they otherwise would receive them. Pursuant to Proposition 1A, the State is required to repay the local government borrowing (which in turn will be used to prepay the bonds of the JPA) no later than June 30, 2013. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget includes $90.8 million for the interest payments that will be incurred in fiscal year 2010-11 to be paid from the General Fund.</R>

<R>Strategic Growth Plan. In January 2006, the Governor proposed a comprehensive Strategic Growth Plan, which was to be the first installment of a 20-year investment in the State's infrastructure in the following five areas: transportation and air quality, education, flood control and water supply, public safety, and court and other public service infrastructure. Specifically, the plan laid out more than $222 billion in infrastructure investments over the first ten years, of which $68 billion would be financed with general obligation bonds, and the remainder would come from a mixture of existing and new funding sources.</R>

<R>In May 2006, the Legislature adopted a package of bills providing part of the infrastructure financing plan requested by the Governor. The main components of this package included four proposed bond measures on the November, 2006 ballot, containing the following elements: (i) $19.9 billion for transportation, air quality, port security and related projects; (ii) $10.4 billion for K-12 school construction and rehabilitation and higher education facilities; (iii) $4.1 billion for levee repair, flood control and related projects, and (iv) $2.9 billion for various housing programs. In addition, there was a constitutional amendment on the ballot to limit future diversions of sales taxes on gasoline from transportation purposes (Proposition 42). All four of these measures were approved by the voters at the November 7, 2006 election, at which time the Governor was also re-elected to a second term in office.</R>

<R>In the November 2008 general election, California voters approved new general obligation bond measures authorizing $9.95 billion for a high-speed train service linking Southern California and the San Francisco Bay Area, $980 million for construction and renovation of children's hospitals and $900 million for mortgage loans to California veterans. The creation of a Strategic Growth Council will be proposed in the next statewide election following the November 2008 general election to coordinate activities and investment of funds in State-owned and State-funded infrastructure. Legislation enacted on November 4, 2009 authorizes submission to the voters at the statewide election on November 2, 2010 of a ballot measure to approve the issuance of $11.14 billion in general obligation bonds for a wide variety of purposes relating to the improvement of California's water supply systems, drought relief, and groundwater protection. Additional bond measures may be included on the November 2, 2010 election ballot, but there are no bond measures on the June 8, 2010 ballot.</R>

<R>Litigation. The State is a party to numerous legal proceedings, many of which normally occur in government operations. In addition, the State is involved in certain other legal proceedings (described in the State's recent financial statements) that, if decided against the State, might require the State to make significant future expenditures or substantially impair future revenue sources. Because of the prospective nature of these proceedings, it is not presently possible to predict the outcome of such litigation, estimate the potential impact on the ability of the State to pay debt service costs on its obligations, or determine what impact, if any, such proceedings may have on a fund's investments.</R>

<R>Municipal Downgrades and Bankruptcies. Municipal bonds may be more susceptible to being downgraded, defaulting, and filing for and entering into bankruptcy during recessions or similar periods of economic stress. Factors contributing to the economic stress on municipalities may include lower property tax collections as a result of lower home values, lower sales tax revenue as a result of consumers cutting back from spending, and lower income tax revenue as a result of a high unemployment rate. In addition, as certain municipal obligations may be secured or guaranteed by banks and other institutions, the risk to a fund could increase if the banking or financial sector suffers an economic downturn and/or if the credit ratings of the institutions issuing the guarantee are downgraded or at risk of being downgraded by a national rating organization. Such a downward revision or risk of being downgraded may have an adverse effect on the market prices of the bonds and thus the value of a fund's investments. Further, an insolvent municipality may file for bankruptcy. For example, Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a financially distressed municipality protection from its creditors while it develops and negotiates a plan for reorganizing its debts. "Municipality" is defined broadly by the Bankruptcy Code as a "political subdivision or public agency or instrumentality of a state" and may include various issuers of securities in which the fund invests. The reorganization of a municipality's debts may be accomplished by extending debt maturities, reducing the amount of principal or interest, refinancing the debt or other measures which may significantly affect the rights of creditors and the value of the securities issued by the municipality and the value of a fund's investments.</R>

<R>In addition, many municipal issuers recently either have been unable to issue bonds or access the market to sell their issues or, if able to access the market, have issued bonds at much higher rates. Should the State or municipalities fail to sell bonds when and at the rates projected, the State could experience significantly increased costs in the General Fund and a weakened overall cash position in the current fiscal year.</R>

<R>Bond Ratings. As of March 22, 2010, the State's general obligation bonds were rated Baa1, A- and BBB by Moody's, Standard & Poor's Rating Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P®) and Fitch Inc. (Fitch), respectively, with each rating representing a downgrade since July 2009. In January, 2010, S&P lowered the State's general obligation bond offering rating to A- from A, indicating that the State's fiscal imbalance and impending recurrence of a cash deficiency as factors in its decision. In July 2009, Fitch lowered the State's general obligation bond rating from A- to BBB citing the State's continued inability to achieve timely agreement on budgetary and cash flow solutions to its severe financial crisis. In the same month, Moody's lowered the State's general obligation bond rating to Baa1 from A2, citing the State's use of IOUs for non-priority payments, the deadlock on the budget gap, and the risk to priority payments. </R>

<R>Each such rating reflects only the views of the respective rating agency and an explanation of the significance of such rating may be obtained from such rating agency. There is no assurance that such ratings will continue for any given period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by such rating agency if in the judgment of such rating agency circumstances so warrant. Lower credit ratings make it more expensive for the State to raise revenue, and in some cases, could prevent the State from issuing general obligation bonds in the quantity otherwise desired. A downward revision or withdrawal of any such rating may have an adverse effect on the marketability and market prices of the bonds held by a fund. </R>

<R>Other Considerations. The repayment of industrial development securities or single family mortgage revenue bonds secured by real property may be affected by California laws limiting foreclosure rights of creditors. Under California law, mortgage loans secured by single family homes can be prepaid at any time without penalty, except in the first five years of the loan, and subject to limits on the size of the penalty. Such prepayments may affect the ability of the issuer of single family mortgage bonds to repay the bonds. Securities backed by health care and hospital revenues may be affected by changes in State regulations governing cost reimbursements to health care providers under Medi-Cal (the State's Medicaid program), including risks related to the policy of awarding exclusive contracts to certain hospitals.</R>

<R>Limitations on ad valorem property taxes may particularly affect "tax allocation" bonds issued by California redevelopment agencies. Such bonds are secured solely by the increase in assessed valuation of a redevelopment project area after the start of redevelopment activity. In the event that assessed values in the redevelopment project decline (e.g., because of a major natural disaster such as an earthquake), the tax increment revenue may be insufficient to make principal and interest payments on these bonds. Both Moody's and S&P suspended ratings on California tax allocation bonds after the enactment of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB, and only resumed such ratings on a selective basis.</R>

<R>Proposition 87, approved by California voters in 1988, requires that all revenues produced by a tax rate increase go directly to the taxing entity which increased such tax rate to repay that entity's general obligation indebtedness. As a result, redevelopment agencies (which, typically, are the issuers of tax allocation securities) no longer receive an increase in tax increment when taxes on property in the project area are increased to repay voter-approved bonded indebtedness.</R>

<R>The effect of these various constitutional and statutory changes upon the ability of California municipal securities issuers to pay interest and principal on their obligations remains unclear. Furthermore, other measures affecting the taxing or spending authority of California or its political subdivisions may be approved or enacted in the future. Legislation has been or may be introduced which would modify existing taxes or other revenue-raising measures or which either would further limit or, alternatively, would increase the abilities of State and local governments to impose new taxes or increase existing taxes. It is not possible, at present, to predict the extent to which any such legislation will be enacted. Nor is it possible, at present, to determine the impact of any such legislation on securities held in a fund, future allocations of State revenues to local governments or the abilities of State or local governments to pay the interest on, or repay the principal of, such securities.</R>

<R>Substantially all of California is within an active geologic region subject to major seismic activity. Northern California in 1989 and Southern California in 1994 experienced major earthquakes causing billions of dollars in damages. The federal government provided more than $13 billion in aid for both earthquakes, and neither event has had any long-term negative economic impact. Any obligation in a fund could be affected by an interruption of revenues because of damaged facilities, or, consequently, income tax deductions for casualty losses or property tax assessment reductions due to earthquakes. Compensatory financial assistance could be constrained by the inability of (i) an issuer to have obtained earthquake insurance coverage rates; (ii) an insurer to perform on its contracts of insurance in the event of widespread losses; or (iii) the federal or State government to appropriate sufficient funds within their respective budget limitations.</R>

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING PUERTO RICO

<R>The following section provides only a summary of (and does not purport to explain, predict, or fully describe) the complex factors, including both economic and political conditions, affecting the financial situation in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (as used in this section, the "Commonwealth" or "Puerto Rico") and is based on information in publicly available documents. This information has not been independently verified. The information provided below is subject to change rapidly, substantially, and without notice, and the inclusion of such information herein shall not under any circumstances create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Commonwealth or its issuers since the date of its preparation. Any such change(s) may adversely affect the Commonwealth's and applicable issuer's cash flows, expenditures, or revenues, or otherwise negatively impact the current or projected Commonwealth financial situation, which in turn could hamper fund performance.</R>

Further, the marketability, valuation or liquidity of Commonwealth municipal securities may be negatively affected in the event that Commonwealth localities or authorities default on their debt obligations or other market events arise, which in turn may negatively affect fund performance, sometimes substantially. Economic and other conditions within the Commonwealth may affect the credit risk of those localities or authorities to the extent that such localities and authorities are reliant upon Commonwealth appropriations. In addition, the difficulties encountered by bond insurers in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis and other credit and overall market events may continue to impact municipal securities negatively, and the full effects of these events remain uncertain.

Relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States. Puerto Rico's constitutional status is that of a territory of the United States (U.S.), and, pursuant to the territorial clause of the U.S. Constitution, the ultimate source of power over Puerto Rico is the U.S. Congress. The Commonwealth exercises virtually the same control over its internal affairs as do each of the 50 U.S. states over their own affairs. The Commonwealth differs from the states, however, in its relationship with the U.S. federal government. The people of Puerto Rico are citizens of the U.S. but do not vote in U.S. national elections. They are represented in Congress by a Resident Commissioner that has a voice in the House of Representatives but no vote (except in House committees and sub-committees to which he belongs). Most U.S. federal taxes, except those such as Social Security taxes, are not levied in Puerto Rico. No U.S. federal income tax is collected from Puerto Rico residents on income earned in Puerto Rico, except for certain federal employees who are subject to taxes on their salaries. Income earned by Puerto Rico residents from sources outside of Puerto Rico, however, is subject to federal income tax.

The Economy of Puerto Rico. The economy of Puerto Rico is closely linked to the U.S. economy, as most of the external factors that affect the Puerto Rico economy (other than oil prices) are determined by the policies and performance of the U.S. economy. These external factors include exports, direct investment, the amount of federal transfer payments, the level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, and tourist expenditures.

The Commonwealth in the past has established policies and programs directed principally at developing the manufacturing sector and expanding and modernizing the Commonwealth's infrastructure. Domestic and foreign investments have historically been stimulated by selective tax exemptions, development loans, and other financial and tax incentives. Infrastructure expansion and modernization have been to a large extent financed by bonds and notes issued by the Commonwealth, its public corporations, and municipalities. Economic progress has been aided by significant increases in the levels of education and occupational skills of the population.

Puerto Rico's economy has experienced a considerable transformation during the past 65 years, shifting from an agriculture economy to an industrial one. Virtually every sector of the economy participated in this expansion. Factors contributing to this expansion include government-sponsored economic development programs, increases in the level of federal transfer payments, and the relatively low cost of borrowing. In some years, these factors were aided by a significant rise in construction investment driven by infrastructure projects, private investment, primarily in housing, and relatively low oil prices. Nevertheless, the significant oil price increases during the past few years, the continuous contraction of the manufacturing sector, and the budgetary pressures on government finances triggered a general contraction in the economy.

The Commonwealth's economy entered a recession beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. For fiscal years 2007 and 2008, the real gross national product (GNP) contracted by 1.9% and 2.5%, respectively. This contraction continued into fiscal year 2009, for which the Puerto Rico Planning Board (the Planning Board) expected a reduction of 3.4% in real GNP. While the trend was expected to continue in fiscal year 2010, the Planning Board announced on April 29, 2009, that the expected positive impact of certain U.S. federal and local economic stimulus measures should outweigh the expected negative impact of the Commonwealth's Fiscal Stabilization Plan (Fiscal Stabilization Plan) and revised its projections for fiscal year 2010 to reflect an increase of 0.1% in real GNP.

Puerto Rico has a diversified economy. Manufacturing and services are among its principal sectors. The manufacturing sector has undergone fundamental changes over the years as a result of increased emphasis on higher-wage, high-technology industries, such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, computers, microprocessors, professional and scientific instruments, and certain high technology machinery and equipment. Manufacturing employment had been declining during the past decade, and the decline accelerated during fiscal years 2002 and 2003, falling 10.6% and 4.8%, respectively. Thereafter, manufacturing employment seemed to stabilize around 118,000 jobs, but the acceleration in job losses reappeared in fiscal year 2006 with the sector experiencing another significant drop of 4.0%. For fiscal years 2007 and 2008, manufacturing employment decreased by 4.2% and 3.4%, respectively. For the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, the sector lost an average of 5,600 jobs, or 5.3% compared to the same period of the previous year. Given that this sector used to pay the highest wages, on average, in Puerto Rico, its general downturn has represented a major difficulty for restoring growth for the whole economy. There are several reasons that explain this sector's job shrinkage: the end of the phase-out of Section 936 of the Internal Revenue Code, the net loss of patents on certain pharmaceutical products, the escalation of manufacturing production costs (particularly labor and electricity), the increased use of job outsourcing, and, the effects of the global economic decline. Puerto Rico's manufacturing sector is also facing increased international competition.

The service sector, which includes finance, insurance, real estate, wholesale and retail trade, transportation, communications and public utilities, and other services, also plays a major role in the Commonwealth's economy. The sector has expanded in terms of both income and employment over the past decade. During the period between fiscal years 2004 and 2008, the gross domestic product in this sector, in nominal terms, increased at an average annual rate of 5.0%, while payroll employment in this sector increased at an average annual rate of 0.8%. In the Puerto Rico labor market, self-employment, which is not accounted for in the Payroll Survey, represents approximately 15% of total employment. Most of the self-employment is concentrated in the service and construction sectors. The development of the service sector has been positively affected by demand generated by other sectors of the economy, such as manufacturing and construction. The service sector ranks second to manufacturing in its contribution to gross domestic product, and it is the sector with the greatest employment. For the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, the average service-sector employment was 546,108, a decrease of 2.6% compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year.

One factor that has promoted the development of the manufacturing and service sectors in Puerto Rico is the various local and federal tax incentives available, particularly those under Puerto Rico's Industrial Incentives Program.

General Risks. Many complex political, social, and economic factors influence the Commonwealth's economy and finances. Such factors may affect the Commonwealth's budget unpredictably from year to year. Such factors include, but are not limited to: (i) developments with respect to the national economy as a whole; (ii) developments with respect to the manufacturing and service sectors of the economy; (iii) developments in the world economy, and in particular commodity prices such as oil; (iv) U.S. fiscal and economic policies, including fiscal stimulus efforts in general and the amount of federal aid to the Commonwealth; (v) and the extent to which the federal stimulus legislation, and in particular the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), as enacted and implemented, provides less federal aid to the Commonwealth than anticipated in the Commonwealth's budget, and the resulting need to implement other revenue enhancements or expenditure reductions.

These factors are continually changing, and no assurances can be given with respect to how these factors or other factors will materialize in the future or what impact they will have on the Commonwealth's fiscal and economic condition. Such factors could have an adverse impact on the Commonwealth budget in the current year and could result in declines, possibly severe, in the value of the Commonwealth's and municipal issuers' outstanding obligations, increases in their future borrowing costs, and impairment of their ability to pay debt service on their obligations.

Recent Events in the Municipal Bond Market. A significant number of auction rate municipal bonds have failed to attract buyers, resulting in "failed auctions" and a resetting of the periodic rates to rates in excess of those which would otherwise prevail in the short-term market. The failed auctions have affected municipal issuers throughout the U.S. and its territories and reflect concerns relating to bond insurers that have insured those bonds as well as changes in the operation of the auction rate itself. As an outcome of these failed auctions, governmental issuers are experiencing significantly higher debt service costs on auction rate bonds and bondholders are experiencing less liquidity than had been anticipated. The duration of the disruption in the auction rate securities market cannot be predicted at this time. In addition, the value of municipal securities may be difficult to measure in the current or a future market environment, as current valuation, significantly affected by external forces, may not reflect the intrinsic, underlying value of Commonwealth municipal securities. These events may adversely impact a fund's NAV.

Fiscal Year 2007. The Planning Board's reports on the performance of the Puerto Rico economy during fiscal year 2007 indicate that the real GNP fell by 1.9%. Nominal GNP was $58.6 billion ($44.2 billion in 2000 prices), compared with $56.7 billion in fiscal year 2006 ($45.0 billion in 2000 prices). This represents an increase in nominal (GNP) of 3.2%. Aggregate personal income was $52.3 billion in fiscal year 2007 ($43.3 billion in 2000 prices), as compared to $50.8 billion in fiscal year 2006 ($43.4 billion in 2000 prices), and personal income per capita was $13,269 in fiscal year 2007 ($11,012 in 2000 prices), as compared to $12,944 in fiscal year 2006 ($11,052 in 2000 prices). (Note: Different price deflators are used for GNP and personal income statistics. The year 2000 is used as a basis for comparison because that is the year used by the U.S. Department of Commerce.)

Total employment for fiscal year 2007 averaged 1,262,900, an increase of 0.8% compared to 1,253,400 for fiscal year 2006. The driving force behind total employment was self-employment. The unemployment rate for fiscal year 2007 was 10.4%, a decrease from 11.7% for fiscal year 2006.

Fiscal Year 2008. The Planning Board's preliminary reports on the performance of the Puerto Rico economy for fiscal year 2008 indicate that real (GNP) decreased 2.5% (3.8% in current dollars) over fiscal year 2007. Nominal (GNP) was $60.8 billion in fiscal year 2008 ($43.0 billion in 2000 prices), compared to $58.6 billion in fiscal year 2007 ($44.2 billion in 2000 prices). Aggregate personal income increased from $52.3 billion in fiscal year 2007 ($43.4 billion in 2000 prices) to $56.2 billion in fiscal year 2008 ($44.8 billion in 2000 prices), and personal income per capita increased from $13,269 in fiscal year 2007 ($11,012 in 2000 prices) to $14,237 in fiscal year 2008 ($11,341 in 2000 prices). The increase in personal income in fiscal year 2008 was due in part to the tax rebate program implemented during such year.

Total employment for fiscal year 2008 averaged 1,217,500, a decrease of 3.6% compared to 1,262,900 for fiscal year 2007. At the same time, the unemployment rate for fiscal year 2008 was 11.0%, an increase from 10.4% for fiscal year 2007.

Among the variables contributing to the decrease in (GNP) were the continuous contraction of the manufacturing and construction sectors, as well as the current contraction of U.S. economic activity. Furthermore, the decline in Puerto Rico's GNP was not offset by the federal tax rebates due to the high levels of oil prices during fiscal year 2008. The persistent high price of oil and its derivatives (such as gasoline) during that period served to reduce the income available for other purchases and thereby negatively affected domestic demand. Due to the Commonwealth's dependence on oil for power generation and gasoline (in spite of its recent improvements in power-production diversification), the high level of oil prices accounted for an increased outflow of local income in fiscal year 2008. The current difficulties associated with the financial crisis resulted in lower short-term interest rates, but this did not translate into an improvement in the construction sector.

Forecast for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010. The Planning Board's GNP forecast for fiscal year 2009, released in February of the same year, projected a decline of 3.4% in constant dollars, or an increase of 1.5% in current dollars. Personal income is expected to decline by 1.5% in real terms, or to increase by 2.3% in nominal terms. While a prolongation of the economic contraction through fiscal year 2010 had been expected, the Planning Board announced on April 29, 2009 that the expected positive impact of the U.S. federal and local economic stimulus measures discussed below should outweigh the expected negative impact of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan also described below, leading it to adjust its projections for fiscal year 2010.

The Planning Board projected a slight increase in GNP of 0.1% in constant dollars or 3.4% in current dollars. The major factors affecting the economy at this point are, among others, the current contraction of U.S. economic activity; the difficulties of the U.S. and local financial systems, which affect the local economy directly; the increase in federal transfers associated to the economic stimulus enacted by the U.S. government; and the local difficulties associated with the Commonwealth's prolonged fiscal crisis, including the cost reduction initiatives to be implemented as part of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan discussed below.

The number of persons employed in Puerto Rico during the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 (from July 2008 to March 2009), averaged 1,179,900, a decrease of 3.1% from the same period of the previous year. Moreover, for the first nine months of the current fiscal year, the unemployment rate was 13.0%, an increase from 11.0% for the first nine months of fiscal year 2008.

Revised Economic Data for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010. In August 2009, the Planning Board revised its GNP forecast for fiscal year 2009 by projecting a base-case scenario decline of 4.8% in constant dollars, a further decline of 1.4% from the projection released in February 2009. The Planning Board, however, made an upward revision to its GNP forecast for fiscal year 2010 by projecting an increase of 0.7% in constant dollars. The Planning Board's revised forecast for fiscal year 2010 takes into account the estimated effect on the Puerto Rico economy of a multi-year Fiscal Stabilization Plan and of the activity expected to be generated by $1.73 billion from ARRA and $280.3 million from the Puerto Rico government's local stimulus package. The revised forecast also considers the effect on the Puerto Rico economy of general global economic conditions, the U.S. economy, the volatility of oil prices, interest rates and the behavior of local exports, including expenditures by visitors.

Based upon 2009 forecasts, Puerto Rico expects to receive approximately $6 billion in stimulus funds from ARRA, of which approximately $3.3 billion will be used to provide consumer and tax payer relief. As of August 2009, the Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, which is responsible for the administration of ARRA in Puerto Rico, reported that approximately $609 million in ARRA funds for use in health, housing, and education related projects, among others, had been disbursed.

The government has also begun disbursing funds under the local stimulus program. Most municipalities have received disbursements earmarked to pay outstanding debts and fund local projects. The government has also disbursed funds allocated towards job training programs, a strategic water distribution project in a southern municipality and the revamping of the Puerto Rico permits system.

Total employment for fiscal year 2009 averaged 1,168,200, a decrease of 4.1% from the previous fiscal year. The unemployment rate for fiscal year 2009 was 13.4%, an increase from 11% for fiscal year 2008. For the month of October 2009, the unemployment rate was 15.7%, compared with 10.2 % for the U.S. as a whole.

Results for Fiscal Year 2009. Total preliminary Puerto Rico General Fund (General Fund) revenues for fiscal year 2009 are $7.76 billion, representing a decrease of $598.6 million, or 7.2%, from preliminary fiscal year 2008 revenues. The major changes from fiscal year 2008 were: (i) decreases in income taxes from individuals of $145.4 million and in corporate income taxes of $201.2 million; (ii) a decrease of $51.9 million in motor vehicle excise taxes; (iii) a decrease of $60.1 million in miscellaneous non-tax revenues; and (iv) a decrease of $16.1 million in sales and use tax revenues. In fiscal year 2008, General Fund revenues also included $145 million of nonrecurring revenues from the sale of certain properties owned by the Commonwealth. The continued decline in General Fund tax revenues reflects primarily the impact of the ongoing economic recession and the effect of tax benefits and incentives granted to certain individual and corporate taxpayers pursuant to previous legislation designed to stimulate economic development.

Total preliminary General Fund revenues for fiscal year 2009 of $7.76 billion exceeded the revised estimate, made in February 2009 of $7.60 billion by approximately $160 million, or 2.1%. The major changes from the revised estimate for fiscal year 2009 were: (i) an increase of $190.4 million in income taxes withheld from non-residents pursuant to certain closing agreements with the Department of the Treasury; and (ii) an increase of $59 million in income taxes from individuals.

Approved Budget for Fiscal Year 2010. On July 1, 2009, the Commonwealth's governor signed a General Fund budget for fiscal year 2010 of $7.670 billion. The approved budget is approximately 19% lower than the $9.48 billion budget approved for fiscal year 2009. The approved budget is lower than the preliminary General Fund net revenues for fiscal year 2009 by $90 million, or 1.2%, and creates a payment schedule for certain Commonwealth debts or other obligations, such as borrowings from Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (GDB) that did not have a dedicated source of repayment, and accounts payable to public corporations. The General Fund budget excludes a $2.5 billion Puerto Rico Stabilization Fund (Stabilization Fund) that will facilitate the orderly implementation of certain expense reduction measures adopted by the Government of the Commonwealth pursuant to Act No. 7 of March 9, 2009, (Act No. 7). The Stabilization Fund will provide (i) $1 billion to finance the cost of transitioning public employees to non-governmental sectors and providing vouchers for re-training, self-employment, relocation and salary subsidy alternatives, and (ii) $1.5 billion to cover payroll and operating expenses that are expected to be reduced through fiscal year 2010, but whose savings will not be realized in such fiscal year. The Stabilization Fund will be funded with proceeds from the bonds issued by the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation ("COFINA" by its Spanish-language acronym).

Amendments to Act No. 7. The Commonwealth's Legislative Assembly approved a series of amendments to Act No. 7, which declared a state of fiscal emergency in Puerto Rico and adopted a comprehensive plan for fiscal and economic stabilization. The amendments do not alter the forecast of General Fund revenues for fiscal year 2010, nor do they affect the adoption of on-going expense reduction measures. Act No. 7 was amended to, among other things: (i) restore the tax-exemption enjoyed by certain securities that were affected by recent changes under the Alternative Minimum Tax; and (ii) introduce, with certain exceptions, a total cap of $40 million for granting tax credits related to Act No. 212 of 2002 (Urban Renewal projects) and establish specific limitations on the claim of such credits. These amendments also re-introduced the Sales and Use Tax Resale Exemption Certificate to retailers with a proven sales volume higher than $500,000. Retailers with a lower sales volume may enjoy the exemption subject to approval from the Secretary. The Secretary retains the right to revoke any Exemption Certificate for the period of a year if a retailer fails to comply with filing requirements related to the Sales and Use Tax. Finally, the amendments extended the temporary Commonwealth property tax to commercial real estate. The applicable Commonwealth property tax will be 0.591%. This temporary tax will be levied for three years or until an aggregated amount of $690 million is collected from this tax, whichever event occurs first.

On August 5, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico denied the preliminary injunction requested by a group of government employees and labor organizations in a complaint filed on April 13, 2009, challenging the constitutionality of Act No. 7 and seeking to enjoin its enforcement. The District Court's decision allows the Government to continue with the implementation of Act No. 7. The Government has moved to dismiss the complaint and will continue to vigorously defend the constitutionality of Act No. 7.

Fiscal Stabilization Plan. The Commonwealth's current administration, which commenced on January 2, 2009, and controls the Executive and Legislative branches of government, has developed and commenced implementing a multi-year Fiscal Stabilization and Economic Reconstruction Plan that seeks to achieve fiscal balance and restore economic growth. The Fiscal Stabilization and Economic Reconstruction Plan is composed of two main elements: the Fiscal Stabilization Plan and the Economic Reconstruction Plan. The Fiscal Stabilization Plan seeks to achieve budgetary balance on or before fiscal year 2013, while addressing expected fiscal deficits in the intervening years through the implementation of a number of initiatives, including the following: (i) a $2 billion operating expense-reduction plan during fiscal year 2010, through government reorganization and reduction of operating expenses, including payroll which is the main component of government expenditures; (ii) a combination of temporary and permanent tax increases, coupled with additional tax enforcement measures; and (iii) a bond issuance program through COFINA. Before the temporary measures expire in 2013, the administration intends to design and adopt a comprehensive reform of the tax system and a long-term economic development plan to complement the economic reconstruction and supplemental stimulus initiatives described below. The proceeds expected to be obtained from the COFINA bond issuance program will be used to repay existing government debt (including debts with the GDB), finance operating expenses of the Commonwealth for fiscal years 2009 through 2011 (and for fiscal year 2012, to the extent included in the government's annual budget for such fiscal year), including costs related to the implementation of a workforce reduction plan, the funding of an economic stimulus plan, as described below, and for other purposes to address the fiscal imbalance while the Fiscal Stabilization Plan is being implemented. The Fiscal Stabilization Plan seeks to safeguard the investment grade ratings of the Commonwealth's general obligation debt and lay the foundation for sustainable economic growth. Legislation has already been enacted authorizing the implementation of all the measures in the Fiscal Stabilization Plan and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has certified projected savings of $237 million for fiscal year 2010 from implemented measures to date.

As discussed above, in order to achieve fiscal balance, the Fiscal Stabilization Plan established a government-wide operating expense-reduction program aimed at reducing annual payroll and other operating expenses by $2 billion by the end of fiscal year 2010. The Fiscal Board estimates that the annual savings from all cost reduction measures implemented or identified by the Commonwealth as of September 30, 2009, will amount to approximately $1.2 billion, which is approximately 60% of the $2 billion target. The Fiscal Board continues to seek and implement various initiatives to obtain additional savings necessary in order to achieve the $2 billion target. The additional savings are expected to come from both cost reduction and revenue generating initiatives, which include, among others, improvements in government procurement processes, reorganization and increased fiscal oversight of government agencies and improvements in tax collection and enforcement measures.

Economic Reconstruction Plan

The Commonwealth's current administration has also developed and commenced implementing a short-term economic reconstruction plan that seeks to stimulate growth in the short-term and lay the foundation for long-term economic development. The cornerstone of this plan is the implementation of U.S. federal and local economic stimulus programs. Puerto Rico will benefit from ARRA enacted by the U.S. government to stimulate the U.S. economy in the wake of the global economic downturn. Puerto Rico expects to receive approximately $5.0 billion from ARRA during the next two fiscal years, which includes tax relief, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, among other measures. The administration will seek to complement the U.S. federal stimulus with additional short- and medium-term supplemental stimulus measures seeking to address specific local challenges and providing investment in strategic areas. These measures include a local $500 million economic stimulus plan to supplement the federal plan. In addition, to further stimulate economic development and cope with the fiscal crisis, the administration is in the process of establishing a legal framework to authorize and promote the use of public-private partnerships to finance and develop infrastructure projects and operate and manage certain public assets.

Economic Development Program. The Department of Economic Development and Commerce (DEDC), in coordination with other government agencies, has been in the process of formulating and implementing a series of economic development initiatives with the goal of laying the groundwork for sustainable economic growth. These initiatives are centered on the dual mission of fostering multi-sector growth while reducing costs and barriers to business and investment, and are a medium-to-long-term counterpart to the Economic Reconstruction Plan and the Supplemental Stimulus Plan described above. The economic development initiatives are aimed at improving Puerto Rico's overall global relevance, competitiveness, and business environment and seek to increase private-sector capital formation and participation in the Puerto Rico economy. The administration will emphasize three main initiatives to enhance Puerto Rico's competitive position: (i) overhauling the permitting process; (ii) reforming the labor market; and (iii) reducing energy costs.

Puerto Rico Tax Incentives. Corporations operating in Puerto Rico (other than corporations organized in the U.S. with a local branch) and individuals residing in Puerto Rico generally are not subject to federal income taxes on income derived in Puerto Rico.

The Commonwealth has enacted legislation providing tax exemptions and tax incentives for businesses operating within certain sectors of the economy. Tax incentives laws have existed in Puerto Rico for over 50 years. The most recent tax incentives act, the Economic Incentives Act enacted on May 28, 2008, covers companies dedicated to manufacturing and the export of services. All eligible businesses operating under previous tax incentives laws may apply for the benefits provided by the Economic Incentives Act.

The Economic Incentives Act streamlines the process for obtaining tax incentives and provides recipients with certainty as to the amount of benefits they will receive over time. The Economic Incentives Act expands the definition of manufacturing to include cluster and supply chain concepts, addresses issues of cost competitiveness, and simplifies the applicable rules. The tax structure established by the Economic Incentives Act generally has a 4% income tax rate and a 12% withholding tax rate for royalties. An alternative structure has an 8% income tax rate and a 2% withholding tax on royalties. For existing businesses with tax rates between 2% and 4%, the Secretary of the DEDC has the discretion to grant the same tax benefits if doing so is considered to be in the best interests of Puerto Rico's economy. Income tax rates may be reduced by an additional 0.5% for projects located in low- or mid-economic development areas. Additional exceptions to the general tax structure exist for pioneering activities, local firms and small businesses. Pioneering activities may have a 1% income tax rate, or no income taxes if the research and development activity is located completely within Puerto Rico. Local firms may enjoy a tax rate as low as 3%, and for small- and medium-sized businesses the tax rate may be as low as 1%, provided such activities are eligible for certain credits provided by the Economic Incentives Act.

A variety of tax credits are available under the Economic Incentives Act, including: for the purchase of products manufactured in Puerto Rico; for job creation; for investment in research and development; for investment in energy-generation equipment; to reduce the cost of energy; to transfer technology; and for investors who acquire exempt operations in the process of shutting down. There are also investment credits for projects classified as strategic projects. Some of these credits can be carried forward and others can be sold.

Public Sector Debt

The Constitution of Puerto Rico limits the amount of general obligation debt that the Commonwealth can issue. Section 2 of Article VI of the Constitution of the Commonwealth provides that direct obligations of the Commonwealth evidenced by full faith and credit bonds or notes shall not be issued if the amount of the principal of and interest on such bonds and notes and on all such bonds and notes theretofore issued that is payable in any fiscal year, together with any amount paid by the Commonwealth in the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year of such proposed issuance on account of bonds or notes guaranteed by the Commonwealth, exceed 15% of the average annual revenues raised under the provisions of Commonwealth legislation and deposited into the Treasury in the two fiscal years preceding the fiscal year of such proposed issuance. Section 2 of Article VI does not limit the amount of debt that the Commonwealth may guarantee so long as the 15% limitation is not exceeded through payments by the Commonwealth on such guaranteed debt. Annual debt service payments on bonds guaranteed by the Commonwealth are not included in the calculation of the 15% debt limitation. In the event any of the public corporations issuers of guaranteed bonds are unable to make any portion of the future debt service payments on their guaranteed bonds, the Commonwealth would be required to make such payments under its guarantee from the General Fund, and such debt service would be included in the calculation of the 15% debt limitation. The Commonwealth's policy has been to be to maintain the level of such debt below the constitutional limitation. Debt of municipalities, other than bond anticipation notes, is supported by real and personal property taxes and municipal license taxes. Debt of public corporations, other than bond anticipation notes, is generally supported by the revenues of such corporations from rates charged for services or products.

Commonwealth Guaranteed Debt. As of December 31, 2008, $3.05 billion of Commonwealth guaranteed bonds of the Public Buildings Authority were outstanding. Maximum annual debt service on these bonds is $236.2 million in fiscal year 2011, with their final maturity being July 1, 2037. No payments under the Commonwealth guaranty have been required to date for these bonds.

As of December 31, 2008, $267 million of Commonwealth guaranteed bonds of GDB were outstanding. No payments under the Commonwealth guaranty have been required for these bonds. As of December 31, 2008, GDB held approximately $154.8 million of the Port of the Americas Authority's outstanding bonds, which are guaranteed by the Commonwealth. The Port of the Americas Authority is authorized to issue and GDB is authorized to purchase its bonds guaranteed by the Commonwealth in a maximum aggregate principal amount of $250 million. The proceeds from these bonds will be used to continue the development of the Port of the Americas. No payments under the Commonwealth guaranty have been required for these bonds.

As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of obligations of the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA) guaranteed by the Commonwealth was $902.0 million. This amount consisted of $284.7 million in revenue bonds sold to the public, $312.4 million in bonds issued to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, and $304.9 million of loans by the State Revolving (Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water Act) Funds for the benefit of PRASA. From January 1997 through fiscal year 2005, the Commonwealth made debt service payments under its guaranty. Beginning with the debt service payment due January 1, 2006, the Commonwealth stopped making guarantee payments on these obligations and PRASA resumed making payments on this debt. In the event PRASA is unable to make any portion of the future debt service payments on its guaranteed obligations, the Commonwealth would be required to make such payments from the General Fund under its guarantee.

Retirement Systems

Public employees of the Commonwealth and its instrumentalities are covered by five retirement systems: the Employees Retirement System, the Puerto Rico System of Annuities and Pensions for Teachers (the Teachers Retirement System), the Commonwealth Judiciary Retirement System (the Judiciary Retirement System), the Retirement System of the University of Puerto Rico (the University Retirement System), and the Employees Retirement System of Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (the Electric Power Authority Retirement System).

The University Retirement System and the Electric Power Authority Retirement System apply to employees of the University of Puerto Rico and Electric Power Authority, respectively. The Commonwealth is not required to contribute directly to those two systems, although a large portion of University revenues is derived from legislative appropriations.

As of June 30, 2008, the total numbers of participants, including active participants and retirees, in the other three systems were as follows: Employees Retirement System, 278,732; Teachers Retirement System, 77,840; and Judiciary Retirement System, 695. The three systems are financed by contributions made by employers (the Commonwealth, public corporations, and municipalities) and employees, and investment income. The central government is responsible for approximately 64% of total employer contributions to the Employees Retirement System and for 100% and 99% of total employer contributions to the Judiciary and Teachers Retirement Systems, respectively.

According to the most recent independent actuarial valuation of the Employees Retirement System, as of June 30, 2007, the preliminary figures for actuarial accrued liability was $16.770 billion and the actuarial value of assets was $2.892 billion, representing a funding ratio of 17.2% and the resulting unfunded actuarial accrued liability was $13.878 billion. The actuarial valuation assumed an investment return of 8.5% per year and a salary increase of 5% per year. During fiscal year 2009, the Employees Retirement System had a cash shortfall of approximately $385 million. This cash shortfall was covered from the sale of certain investments. The Employees Retirement System's projected cash flow shortfall for fiscal year 2010 is approximately $400 million, which is expected to be covered from resources available to the Employees Retirement System, including the sale of certain investments. This negative trend is expected to continue partly due to possible future increases in the cost of living adjustments, changes in demographics of retirees and beneficiaries, and possible higher pension payments due to higher salaries of future retirees. The Employees Retirement System's cash flow shortfall for fiscal year 2010 could also be affected by the implementation of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan. The Employees Retirement System continues to evaluate measures to improve the System's cash flow and funding ratio, as well as the potential impact of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan. The Employees Retirement System's disbursements of benefits during fiscal years 2004 through 2007 exceeded contributions and investment income for those years. The cash shortfall for fiscal year 2004 was covered with a loan received from the Department of the Treasury. Balances owed to the Department of the Treasury and other pending working capital needs through fiscal year 2005 were refinanced through a repurchase agreement with a financial institution in an amount of $138 million collateralized with the assets of the Employees Retirement System. The cash shortfall for fiscal year 2006 was approximately $70 million. This shortfall was covered with a line of credit provided by a private financial institution and collateralized with the assets of the Employees Retirement System. There was no cash shortfall for fiscal year 2007 on account of the receipt of the proceeds from the sale of the Puerto Rico Telephone Company stock that the Puerto Rico Telephone Authority held for the benefit of the Trust. Also with these proceeds the Employees Retirement System paid off the balances of the 2005 repurchase agreement and the 2006 line of credit used to cover the respective year's cash shortfalls. For fiscal year 2008, the Employees Retirement System experienced a positive cash flow due to various nonrecurring sources of income and a series of financings to increase the Employees Retirement System's funding ratio and reduce its unfunded pension benefit obligation. The financings involved the issuance by the Employees Retirement System of debt secured by a pledge of future employer contributions over the next 50 years. All net cash generated by these financings was deposited into the Employees Retirement System trust and invested along with its other assets. As of June 30, 2008, the Employees Retirement System had issued three series totaling approximately $2.9 billion of its Senior Pension Funding Bonds.

According to the most recent actuarial valuation of the Teachers Retirement System submitted by a firm of independent consulting actuaries, as of June 30, 2007, the accrued actuarial liability was $7.756 billion and the value of its assets amounted to $3.163 billion, representing a funding ratio of 41%, and the resulting unfunded accrued liability was $4.593 billion. The actuarial valuation assumed an investment return of 8%, yearly salary increases of 3.5%, employee and employer contributions of 9% and 8.5%, respectively, an inflation rate of 2.5%, and a remaining amortization period of 30 years for the unfunded accrued liability. With respect to the Teachers Retirement System, the cash shortfalls for fiscal years 2006, 2007, and 2008 were $65 million, $40 million, and $75 million, respectively. Investments were liquidated to cover these shortfalls. For fiscal year 2009, the Teachers Retirement System expects to have a cash shortfall of approximately $67 million. Based on the Teachers Retirement System's estimates, it could have an $81 million cash flow deficit for fiscal year 2010. This negative trend is expected to continue given that Puerto Rico Teachers Retirement System is in a relatively mature stage. Based on the current statutory funding requirements, the annual benefit payments and administrative expenses paid by the Teachers Retirement System are significantly larger than the member and employer contributions made to the Teachers Retirement System. Thus, according to the 2007 actuarial valuation, investment income must be used to cover this negative cash flow. The Teachers Retirement System is seeking reimbursement from the Commonwealth's General Fund in the amount of $119 million for special benefits paid by the Teachers Retirement System to its beneficiaries through June 30, 2004, pursuant to special benefit laws enacted by the Legislative Assembly. The Teachers Retirement System's interpretation of these special benefit laws, to the effect that the Commonwealth is required to reimburse the Teachers Retirement System for such special benefits paid, is being disputed by the Office of Management and Budget. In March 2009 the Department of Education paid to the Teachers Retirement System the amount of $12 million as partial payment. The dispute for the pending amount of $107 million continues under inter-agency arbitration proceedings. The Employees Retirement System is also seeking reimbursement from the Commonwealth (in connection with other special benefits laws applicable to its beneficiaries) in the amount of $73.9 million, representing cumulative benefits paid to beneficiaries through June 30, 2005.

The market value of the investment portfolios (which excludes loans to plan members) held by the retirement plans has been materially adversely affected by the global decline in value of equity securities. This decline has had an adverse effect on the unfunded actuarial accrued liability of the retirement systems.

Litigation. The Commonwealth and its officers and employees are parties to numerous legal proceedings, many of which normally occur in government operations. In addition, the Commonwealth is involved in certain other legal proceedings (described in the Commonwealth's recent Official Statements) that, if decided against the Commonwealth, might require the Commonwealth to make significant future expenditures or substantially impair future revenue sources. Because of the prospective nature of these proceedings, it is not presently possible to predict the outcome of such litigation, estimate the potential impact on the ability of the Commonwealth to pay debt service costs on its obligations, or determine what impact, if any, such proceedings may have on a fund's investments.

Bond Ratings. As of December 24, 2009, the Commonwealth's General Obligation Bonds were rated Baa3 and BBB- by Moody's and S&P, respectively.

Each such rating reflects only the views of the respective rating agency and an explanation of the significance of such rating may be obtained from such rating agency. There is no assurance that such ratings will continue for any given period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by such rating agency if in the judgment of such rating agency circumstances so warrant. A downward revision or withdrawal of any such rating may have an adverse effect on the market prices of the bonds.

PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS

All orders for the purchase or sale of portfolio securities are placed on behalf of each fund by FMR pursuant to authority contained in the management contract. FMR may also be responsible for the placement of portfolio transactions for other investment companies and investment accounts for which it has or its affiliates have investment discretion. If FMR grants investment management authority to a sub-adviser (see the section entitled "Management Contracts"), that sub-adviser is authorized to provide the services described in the sub-advisory agreement, and in accordance with the policies described in this section.

Purchases and sales of equity securities on a securities exchange or over-the-counter (OTC) are effected through brokers who receive compensation for their services. Generally, compensation relating to securities traded on foreign exchanges will be higher than compensation relating to securities traded on U.S. exchanges and may not be subject to negotiation. Compensation may also be paid in connection with principal transactions (in both OTC securities and securities listed on an exchange) and agency OTC transactions executed with an electronic communications network (ECN) or an alternative trading system. Equity securities may be purchased from underwriters at prices that include underwriting fees.

Purchases and sales of fixed-income securities are generally made with an issuer or a primary market-maker acting as principal. Although there is no stated brokerage commission paid by the fund for any fixed-income security, the price paid by the fund to an underwriter includes the disclosed underwriting fee and prices in secondary trades usually include an undisclosed dealer commission or markup reflecting the spread between the bid and ask prices of the fixed-income security.

The Trustees of each fund periodically review FMR's performance of its responsibilities in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund. The Trustees also review the compensation paid by the fund over representative periods of time to determine if it was reasonable in relation to the benefits to the fund.

The Selection of Brokers

In selecting brokers or dealers (including affiliates of FMR) to execute each fund's portfolio transactions, FMR considers factors deemed relevant in the context of a particular trade and in regard to FMR's overall responsibilities with respect to each fund and other investment accounts, including any instructions from each fund's portfolio manager, which may emphasize, for example, speed of execution over other factors. The factors considered will influence whether it is appropriate to execute an order using ECNs, electronic channels including algorithmic trading, or by actively working an order. Other factors deemed relevant may include, but are not limited to: price; the size and type of the transaction; the reasonableness of compensation to be paid, including spreads and commission rates; the speed and certainty of trade executions, including broker willingness to commit capital; the nature and characteristics of the markets for the security to be purchased or sold, including the degree of specialization of the broker in such markets or securities; the availability of liquidity in the security, including the liquidity and depth afforded by a market center or market-maker; the reliability of a market center or broker; the broker's overall trading relationship with FMR; the trader's assessment of whether and how closely the broker likely will follow the trader's instructions to the broker; the degree of anonymity that a particular broker or market can provide; the potential for avoiding market impact; the execution services rendered on a continuing basis; the execution efficiency, settlement capability, and financial condition of the firm; arrangements for payment of fund expenses, if applicable; and the provision of additional brokerage and research products and services, if applicable. In seeking best qualitative execution, FMR may select a broker using a trading method for which the broker may charge a higher commission than its lowest available commission rate. FMR also may select a broker that charges more than the lowest available commission rate available from another broker. For futures transactions, the selection of a futures commission merchant (FCM) is generally based on the overall quality of execution and other services provided by the FCM.

The Acquisition of Brokerage and Research Products and Services

Brokers (who are not affiliates of FMR) that execute transactions for each fund may receive higher compensation from each fund than other brokers might have charged each fund, in recognition of the value of the brokerage or research products and services they provide to FMR or its affiliates.

Research Products and Services. These products and services may include: economic, industry, company, municipal, sovereign (U.S. and non-U.S.), legal, or political research reports; market color; company meeting facilitation; compilation of securities prices, earnings, dividends and similar data; quotation services, data, information and other services; analytical computer software and services; and investment recommendations. FMR may request that a broker provide a specific proprietary or third-party product or service. Some of these products and services supplement FMR's own research activities in providing investment advice to the funds.

Execution Services. In addition, products and services may include those that assist in the execution, clearing, and settlement of securities transactions, as well as other incidental functions (including but not limited to communication services related to trade execution, order routing and algorithmic trading, post-trade matching, exchange of messages among brokers or dealers, custodians and institutions, and the use of electronic confirmation and affirmation of institutional trades).

Mixed-Use Products and Services. In addition to receiving brokerage and research products and services via written reports and computer-delivered services, such reports may also be provided by telephone and in personal meetings with securities analysts, corporate and industry spokespersons, economists, academicians and government representatives and others with relevant professional expertise. FMR and its affiliates may use commission dollars to obtain certain products or services that are not used exclusively in FMR's or its affiliates' investment decision-making process (mixed-use products or services). In those circumstances, FMR or its affiliates will make a good faith judgment to evaluate the various benefits and uses to which they intend to put the mixed-use product or service, and will pay for that portion of the mixed-use product or service that does not qualify as brokerage and research products and services with their own resources (referred to as "hard dollars").

Benefit to FMR. FMR's expenses would likely be increased if it attempted to generate these additional products and services through its own efforts, or if it paid for these products or services itself. Certain of the brokerage and research products and services FMR receives from brokers are furnished by brokers on their own initiative, either in connection with a particular transaction or as part of their overall services. Some of these products or services may not have an explicit cost associated with such product or service.

FMR's Decision-Making Process. Before causing a fund to pay a particular level of compensation, FMR will make a good faith determination that the compensation is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and/or research products and services provided to FMR, viewed in terms of the particular transaction for a fund or FMR's overall responsibilities to a fund or other investment companies and investment accounts. While FMR may take into account the brokerage and/or research products and services provided by a broker in determining whether compensation paid is reasonable, neither FMR nor the funds incur an obligation to any broker, dealer, or third party to pay for any product or service (or portion thereof) by generating a specific amount of compensation or otherwise. Typically, these products and services assist FMR and its affiliates in terms of its overall investment responsibilities to a fund and other investment companies and investment accounts; however, each product or service received may not benefit the fund. Certain funds or investment accounts may use brokerage commissions to acquire brokerage and research products and services that may also benefit other funds or accounts managed by FMR or its affiliates.

Research Contracts. FMR has arrangements with certain third-party research providers and brokers through whom FMR effects fund trades, whereby FMR may pay with fund commissions or hard dollars for all or a portion of the cost of research products and services purchased from such research providers or brokers. If hard dollar payments are used, FMR may still cause a fund to pay more for execution than the lowest commission rate available from the broker providing research products and services to FMR, or that may be available from another broker. FMR views hard dollar payments for research products and services as likely to reduce a fund's total commission costs even though it is expected that in such hard dollar arrangements the commissions available for recapture and to pay fund expenses, as described below, will decrease. FMR's determination to pay for research products and services separately, rather than bundled with fund commissions, is wholly voluntary on FMR's part and may be extended to additional brokers or discontinued with any broker participating in this arrangement.

Commission Recapture

FMR may allocate brokerage transactions to brokers (who are not affiliates of FMR) who have entered into arrangements with FMR under which the broker, using a predetermined methodology, rebates a portion of the compensation paid by a fund to offset that fund's expenses, which may be paid to FMR or its affiliates. Not all brokers with whom a fund trades have agreed to participate in brokerage commission recapture.

Affiliated Transactions

FMR may place trades with certain brokers, including National Financial Services LLC (NFS), with whom it is under common control provided FMR determines that these affiliates' trade execution abilities and costs are comparable to those of non-affiliated, qualified brokerage firms.

The Trustees of each fund have approved procedures whereby a fund may purchase securities that are offered in underwritings in which an affiliate of FMR participates. In addition, for underwritings where an FMR affiliate participates as a principal underwriter, certain restrictions may apply that could, among other things, limit the amount of securities that the funds could purchase in the underwritings.

Trade Allocation

Although the Trustees and officers of each fund are substantially the same as those of other funds managed by FMR or its affiliates, investment decisions for each fund are made independently from those of other funds or investment accounts (including proprietary accounts) managed by FMR or its affiliates. The same security is often held in the portfolio of more than one of these funds or investment accounts. Simultaneous transactions are inevitable when several funds and investment accounts are managed by the same investment adviser, particularly when the same security is suitable for the investment objective of more than one fund or investment account.

When two or more funds or investment accounts are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, including a futures contract, the prices and amounts are allocated in accordance with procedures believed by FMR to be appropriate and equitable to each fund or investment account. In some cases adherence to these procedures could have a detrimental effect on the price or value of the security as far as each fund is concerned. In other cases, however, the ability of the funds to participate in volume transactions will produce better executions and prices for the funds.

Commissions Paid

A fund may pay compensation including both commissions and spreads in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions. The amount of brokerage commissions paid by a fund may change from year to year because of, among other things, changing asset levels, shareholder activity, and/or portfolio turnover.

<R> </R>

<R>For the fiscal years ended February 28, 2010, and 2009, and February 29, 2008, each fund paid no brokerage commissions.</R>

<R>During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, each fund paid no brokerage commissions to firms for providing research or brokerage services.</R>

<R>During the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2009, each fund did not allocate brokerage commissions to firms for providing research or brokerage services.</R>

VALUATION

For the non-multiple class fund, the fund's NAV is the value of a single share. The NAV of each fund is computed by adding the value of the fund's investments, cash, and other assets, subtracting its liabilities, and dividing the result by the number of shares outstanding.

For the multiple class fund, each class's NAV is the value of a single share. The NAV of each class is computed by adding the class's pro rata share of the value of the applicable fund's investments, cash, and other assets, subtracting the class's pro rata share of the applicable fund's liabilities, subtracting the liabilities allocated to the class, and dividing the result by the number of shares of that class that are outstanding.

Portfolio securities and other assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost. This technique involves initially valuing an instrument at its cost as adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount rather than its current market value. The amortized cost value of an instrument may be higher or lower than the price a fund would receive if it sold the instrument.

Securities of other open-end investment companies are valued at their respective NAVs.

At such intervals as they deem appropriate, the Trustees consider the extent to which NAV calculated by using market valuations would deviate from the $1.00 per share calculated using amortized cost valuation. If the Trustees believe that a deviation from a fund's amortized cost per share may result in material dilution or other unfair results to shareholders, the Trustees have agreed to take such corrective action, if any, as they deem appropriate to eliminate or reduce, to the extent reasonably practicable, the dilution or unfair results. Such corrective action could include selling portfolio instruments prior to maturity to realize capital gains or losses or to shorten average portfolio maturity; withholding dividends; redeeming shares in kind; establishing NAV by using available market quotations; and such other measures as the Trustees may deem appropriate.

BUYING, SELLING, AND EXCHANGING INFORMATION

A fund may make redemption payments in whole or in part in readily marketable securities or other property pursuant to procedures approved by the Trustees if FMR determines it is in the best interests of the fund. Such securities or other property will be valued for this purpose as they are valued in computing the NAV of a fund or class, as applicable. Shareholders that receive securities or other property will realize, upon receipt, a gain or loss for tax purposes, and will incur additional costs and be exposed to market risk prior to and upon sale of such securities or other property.

DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES

Dividends. To the extent that each fund's income is designated as federally tax-exempt interest, the dividends declared by the fund will be federally tax-exempt, provided that the fund qualifies to pay tax-exempt dividends. In order to qualify to pay tax-exempt dividends, at least 50% of the value of the fund's total assets (including uninvested assets) must consist of tax-exempt municipal securities at the close of each quarter of the fund's taxable year. Short-term capital gains are taxable at ordinary income tax rates.

Generally, each fund purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the opinion of bond counsel, is free from federal income tax and for Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund from the federal AMT. Neither FMR nor the funds guarantee that this opinion is correct, and there is no assurance that the IRS will agree with bond counsel's opinion. Issuers or other parties generally enter into covenants requiring continuing compliance with federal tax requirements to preserve the tax-free status of interest payments over the life of the security. If at any time the covenants are not complied with, or if the IRS otherwise determines that the issuer did not comply with relevant tax requirements, interest payments from a security could become federally taxable, possibly retroactively to the date the security was issued and you may need to file an amended income tax return. For certain types of structured securities, the tax status of the pass-through of tax-free income may also be based on the federal and state tax treatment of the structure.

Interest on certain "private activity" securities is subject to the federal AMT, although the interest continues to be excludable from gross income for other tax purposes. Interest from private activity securities is a tax preference item for the purposes of determining whether a taxpayer is subject to the AMT and the amount of AMT to be paid, if any.

A portion of the gain on municipal bonds purchased at market discount after April 30, 1993 is taxable to shareholders as ordinary income, not as capital gains.

<R>California Tax Matters. As long as the fund continues to qualify as a regulated investment company under the federal Internal Revenue Code, it will incur no California income or franchise tax liability on income and capital gains distributed to shareholders. California personal income tax law provides that exempt-interest dividends paid by a regulated investment company, or series thereof, from interest on obligations that are exempt from California personal income tax are excludable from gross income. For a fund to qualify to pay exempt-interest dividends under California law, at least 50% of the value of its assets must consist of such obligations at the close of each quarter of its fiscal year. For purposes of California personal income taxation, distributions to individual shareholders derived from interest on other types of obligations and short-term capital gains will be taxed as dividends, and long-term capital gain distributions will be taxed as capital gains. California has an alternative minimum tax similar to the federal AMT described above. However, the California AMT does not include interest from private activity municipal obligations as an item of tax preference. Interest on indebtedness incurred or continued by a shareholder in connection with the purchase of shares of a fund will not be deductible for California personal income tax purposes. Corporate taxpayers should note that dividends will not be exempt from California corporate income or franchise tax.</R>

Capital Gain Distributions. Each fund may distribute any net realized capital gains once a year or more often, as necessary.

<R> </R>

Tax Status of the Funds. Each fund intends to qualify each year as a "regulated investment company" under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code so that it will not be liable for federal tax on income and capital gains distributed to shareholders. In order to qualify as a regulated investment company, and avoid being subject to federal income or excise taxes at the fund level, each fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized capital gains within each calendar year as well as on a fiscal year basis, and intends to comply with other tax rules applicable to regulated investment companies.

Other Tax Information. The information above is only a summary of some of the tax consequences generally affecting each fund and its shareholders, and no attempt has been made to discuss individual tax consequences. It is up to you or your tax preparer to determine whether the sale of shares of a fund resulted in a capital gain or loss or other tax consequence to you. In addition to federal income taxes, shareholders may be subject to state and local taxes on fund distributions, and shares may be subject to state and local personal property taxes. Investors should consult their tax advisers to determine whether a fund is suitable to their particular tax situation.

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

<R>The Trustees and executive officers of the trust, as applicable, are listed below. The Board of Trustees governs each fund and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders. The Trustees are experienced executives who meet periodically throughout the year to oversee each fund's activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that provide services to each fund, oversee management of the risks associated with such activities and contractual arrangements, and review each fund's performance. Except for James C. Curvey, each of the Trustees oversees 188 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate. Mr. Curvey oversees 410 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate.</R>

<R>The Trustees hold office without limit in time except that (a) any Trustee may resign; (b) any Trustee may be removed by written instrument, signed by at least two-thirds of the number of Trustees prior to such removal; (c) any Trustee who requests to be retired or who has become incapacitated by illness or injury may be retired by written instrument signed by a majority of the other Trustees; and (d) any Trustee may be removed at any special meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds vote of the outstanding voting securities of the trust. Each Trustee who is not an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) (Independent Trustee), shall retire not later than the last day of the calendar year in which his or her 72nd birthday occurs. The Independent Trustees may waive this mandatory retirement age policy with respect to individual Trustees. The executive officers hold office without limit in time, except that any officer may resign or may be removed by a vote of a majority of the Trustees at any regular meeting or any special meeting of the Trustees. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the past five years.</R>

<R>Experience, Skills, Attributes, and Qualifications of the Funds' Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has adopted a statement of policy that describes the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that are necessary and desirable for potential Independent Trustee candidates ("Statement of Policy"). The Board believes that each Trustee satisfied at the time he or she was initially elected or appointed a Trustee, and continues to satisfy, the standards contemplated by the Statement of Policy. The Governance and Nominating Committee also engages professional search firms to help identify potential Independent Trustee candidates who have the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills consistent with the Statement of Policy. From time to time, additional criteria based on the composition and skills of the current Independent Trustees, as well as experience or skills that may be appropriate in light of future changes to board composition, business conditions, and regulatory or other developments, have also been considered by the professional search firms and the Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition, the Board takes into account the Trustees' commitment and participation in Board and committee meetings, as well as their leadership of standing and ad hoc committees throughout their tenure.</R>

<R>In determining that a particular Trustee was and continues to be qualified to serve as a Trustee, the Board has considered a variety of criteria, none of which, in isolation, was controlling. The Board believes that, collectively, the Trustees have balanced and diverse experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills, which allow the Board to operate effectively in governing each fund and protecting the interests of shareholders. Information about the specific experience, skills, attributes, and qualifications of each Trustee, which in each case led to the Board's conclusion that the Trustee should serve (or continue to serve) as a trustee of the funds, is provided below.</R>

<R>Board Structure and Oversight Function. Abigail P. Johnson is an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) and currently serves as Chairman. The Trustees have determined that an interested Chairman is appropriate and benefits shareholders because an interested Chairman has a personal and professional stake in the quality and continuity of services provided to the funds. Independent Trustees exercise their informed business judgment to appoint an individual of their choosing to serve as Chairman, regardless of whether the Trustee happens to be independent or a member of management. The Independent Trustees have determined that they can act independently and effectively without having an Independent Trustee serve as Chairman and that a key structural component for assuring that they are in a position to do so is for the Independent Trustees to constitute a substantial majority for the Board. The Independent Trustees also regularly meet in executive session. Kenneth L. Wolfe serves as Chairman of the Independent Trustees and as such (i) acts as a liaison between the Independent Trustees and management with respect to matters important to the Independent Trustees and (ii) with management prepares agendas for Board meetings.</R>

<R>Fidelity funds are overseen by different Boards of Trustees. The funds' Board oversees Fidelity's investment-grade bond, money market, and asset allocation funds and another Board oversees Fidelity's equity and high income funds. The asset allocation funds may invest in Fidelity funds that are overseen by such other Board. The use of separate Boards, each with its own committee structure, allows the Trustees of each group of Fidelity funds to focus on the unique issues of the funds they oversee, including common research, investment, and operational issues. On occasion, the separate Boards establish joint committees to address issues of overlapping consequences for the Fidelity funds overseen by each Board.</R>

<R>The Trustees operate using a system of committees to facilitate the timely and efficient consideration of all matters of importance to the Trustees, each fund, and fund shareholders and to facilitate compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and oversight of the funds' activities and associated risks. The Board, acting through its committees, has charged FMR and its affiliates with (i) identifying events or circumstances the occurrence of which could have demonstrably adverse effects on the funds' business and/or reputation; (ii) implementing processes and controls to lessen the possibility that such events or circumstances occur or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur; and (iii) creating and maintaining a system designed to evaluate continuously business and market conditions in order to facilitate the identification and implementation processes described in (i) and (ii) above. Because the day-to-day operations and activities of the funds are carried out by or through FMR, its affiliates and other service providers, the funds' exposure to risks is mitigated but not eliminated by the processes overseen by the Trustees. While each of the Board's committees has responsibility for overseeing different aspects of the funds' activities, oversight is exercised primarily through the Operations and Audit Committees. Appropriate personnel, including but not limited to the funds' Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO"), FMR's internal auditor, the independent accountants, the funds' Treasurer and portfolio management personnel, make periodic reports to the Board's committees, as appropriate. The responsibilities of each committee, including their oversight responsibilities, are described further under "Standing Committees of the Funds' Trustees."</R>

<R>Interested Trustees*:</R>

<R>Correspondence intended for each Trustee who is an interested person may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.</R>

<R>Name, Age; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+</R>

<R>Abigail P. Johnson (48)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009</R>

Ms. Johnson is Trustee and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of certain Trusts. Ms. Johnson serves as President of Personal and Workplace Investing (2005-present). Ms. Johnson is a Director of FMR LLC. Previously, Ms. Johnson served as President and a Director of FMR (2001-2005), a Trustee of other investment companies advised by FMR, Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc., and FMR Co., Inc. (2001-2005), Senior Vice President of the Fidelity funds (2001-2005), and managed a number of Fidelity funds. Ms. Abigail P. Johnson and Mr. Arthur E. Johnson are not related.

<R>James C. Curvey (74)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2007</R>

Mr. Curvey also serves as Trustee (2007-present) of other investment companies advised by FMR. Mr. Curvey is a Director of FMR and FMR Co., Inc. (2007-present). Mr. Curvey is also Vice Chairman (2006-present) and Director of FMR LLC. In addition, Mr. Curvey serves as an Overseer for the Boston Symphony Orchestra and a member of the Trustees of Villanova University.

<R>* Trustees have been determined to be "Interested Trustees" by virtue of, among other things, their affiliation with the trust or various entities under common control with.</R>

<R>+ The information above includes each Trustee's principal occupation during the last five years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills relevant to each Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the conclusion that each Trustee should serve as a Trustee for each fund.</R>

<R>Independent Trustees:</R>

<R>Correspondence intended for each Independent Trustee (that is, the Trustees other than the Interested Trustees) may be sent to Fidelity Investments, P.O. Box 55235, Boston, Massachusetts 02205-5235.</R>

<R>Name, Age; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+</R>

<R>Albert R. Gamper, Jr. (67)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006</R>

Prior to his retirement in December 2004, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman of the Board of CIT Group Inc. (commercial finance). During his tenure with CIT Group Inc. Mr. Gamper served in numerous senior management positions, including Chairman (1987-1989; 1999-2001; 2002-2004), Chief Executive Officer (1987-2004), and President (2002-2003). He also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Tyco Capital Corporation (2001-2002). Mr. Gamper currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Public Service Enterprise Group (utilities, 2000-present), a member of the Board of Trustees, Rutgers University (2004-present), and Chairman of the Board of Saint Barnabas Health Care System. Previously, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman of the Board of Governors, Rutgers University (2004-2007).

<R>Robert F. Gartland (58)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010</R>

Mr. Gartland is a partner and investor of Vietnam Partners LLC (investments and consulting, 2008-present) and is Chairman and an investor in Gartland and Mellina Group Corp. (consulting, 2009-present). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Gartland held a variety of positions at Morgan Stanley (financial services, 1979-2007) including Managing Director (1987-2007).

<R>Arthur E. Johnson (62)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

Mr. Johnson serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Eaton Corporation (diversified power management, 2009-present) and AGL Resources, Inc. (holding company). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Johnson served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategic Development of Lockheed Martin Corporation (defense contractor, 1999-2009). He previously served on the Board of Directors of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (1999-2008) and Delta Airlines (2005-2007). Mr. Arthur E. Johnson and Ms. Abigail P. Johnson are not related.

<R>Michael E. Kenneally (55)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009</R>

Prior to his retirement, Mr. Kenneally served as a Member of the Advisory Board for certain Fidelity Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds (2008-2009). Mr. Kenneally served as Chairman and Global Chief Executive Officer of Credit Suisse Asset Management (2003-2005). Mr. Kenneally was a Director of the Credit Suisse Funds (U.S. mutual funds, 2004-2008) and certain other closed-end funds (2004-2005) and was awarded the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation in 1991.

<R>James H. Keyes (69)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2007</R>

Mr. Keyes serves as a member of the Boards of Navistar International Corporation (manufacture and sale of trucks, buses, and diesel engines, since 2002) and Pitney Bowes, Inc. (integrated mail, messaging, and document management solutions, since 1998). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Keyes served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Johnson Controls (automotive, building, and energy, 1998-2002) and as a member of the Board of LSI Logic Corporation (semiconductor technologies, 1984-2008).

<R>Marie L. Knowles (63)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2001</R>

Prior to Ms. Knowles' retirement in June 2000, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) (diversified energy, 1996-2000). From 1993 to 1996, she was a Senior Vice President of ARCO and President of ARCO Transportation Company. She served as a Director of ARCO from 1996 to 1998. Ms. Knowles currently serves as a Director of McKesson Corporation (healthcare service, since 2002). Ms. Knowles is an Honorary Trustee of the Brookings Institution and a member of the Board of the Catalina Island Conservancy and of the Santa Catalina Island Company (2009-present). She also serves as a member of the Advisory Board for the School of Engineering of the University of Southern California and the Foundation Board of the School of Architecture at the University of Virginia (2007-present). Previously, Ms. Knowles served as a Director of Phelps Dodge Corporation (copper mining and manufacturing, 1994-2007).

<R>Kenneth L. Wolfe (70)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005</R>

Mr. Wolfe is Chairman of the Independent Trustees of the Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds (2008-present). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Wolfe served as Chairman and a Director (2007-2009) and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hershey Foods Corporation. He also served as a member of the Boards of Adelphia Communications Corporation (telecommunications, 2003-2006), Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (medical/pharmaceutical, 1993-2007), and Revlon, Inc. (personal care products, 2004-2009).

<R>+ The information above includes each Trustee's principal occupation during the last five years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills relevant to each Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the conclusion that each Trustee should serve as a Trustee for each fund.</R>

<R>Correspondence intended for each executive officer may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.</R>

<R>Name, Age; Principal Occupation</R>

<R>John R. Hebble (51)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

President and Treasurer of Fidelity's Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds. Mr. Hebble also serves as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of The North Carolina Capital Management Trust: Cash and Term Portfolio (2008-present), Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2009-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments.

<R>Boyce I. Greer (53)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005 or 2006</R>

Vice President of Fidelity's Fixed Income Funds (2006) and Asset Allocation Funds (2005). Mr. Greer is also a Trustee of other investment companies advised by FMR. Mr. Greer is President of the Asset Allocation Division (2008-present), President and a Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2008-present), President and a Director of Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (2007-present), and an Executive Vice President of FMR (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Greer served as Executive Vice President of FMR Co., Inc. (2005-2009), and as a Director and Managing Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2002-2005).

<R>Robert P. Brown (46)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010</R>

Vice President of Fidelity's Money Market Funds. Mr. Brown also serves as President, Money Market Group of FMR (2010-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments.

<R>Scott C. Goebel (42)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (CLO) of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Goebel also serves as General Counsel, Secretary, and Senior Vice President of FMR (2008-present) and FMR Co., Inc. (2008-present); Deputy General Counsel of FMR LLC; Chief Legal Officer of Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (2008-present) and Assistant Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc. (2008-present), Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (2008-present), Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (2008-present), and Fidelity Research and Analysis Company (2008-present). Previously, Mr. Goebel served as Assistant Secretary of the Funds (2007-2008) and as Vice President and Secretary of Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) (2005-2007).

<R>Holly C. Laurent (55)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Officer of the Fidelity funds. Ms. Laurent is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Ms. Laurent was Senior Vice President and Head of Legal for Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd. (2006-2008), and Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Group Head for FMR LLC (2005-2006).

<R>Christine Reynolds (51)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

Chief Financial Officer of the Fidelity funds. Ms. Reynolds became President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) in August 2008. Ms. Reynolds served as Chief Operating Officer of FPCMS (2007-2008). Previously, Ms. Reynolds served as President, Treasurer, and Anti-Money Laundering officer of the Fidelity funds (2004-2007).

<R>Michael H. Whitaker (42)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity's Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds. Mr. Whitaker is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2007-present). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Whitaker worked at MFS Investment Management where he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer (2004-2006), and Assistant General Counsel.

<R>Jeffrey S. Christian (48)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009</R>

Deputy Treasurer of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Christian is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Christian served as Chief Financial Officer (2008-2009) of certain Fidelity funds and Senior Vice President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) (2004-2009).

<R>Bryan A. Mehrmann (48)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005</R>

Deputy Treasurer of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Mehrmann is an employee of Fidelity Investments.

<R>Stephanie J. Dorsey (40)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

Deputy Treasurer of Fidelity's Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds. Ms. Dorsey is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2008-present). Previously, Ms. Dorsey served as Treasurer (2004-2008) of the JPMorgan Mutual Funds and Vice President (2004-2008) of JPMorgan Chase Bank.

<R>Paul M. Murphy (62)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2007</R>

Assistant Treasurer of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Murphy is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Murphy served as Chief Financial Officer of the Fidelity funds (2005-2006), Vice President and Associate General Counsel of FMR (2007), and Senior Vice President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) (1994-2007).

<R>Kenneth B. Robins (40)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009</R>

Assistant Treasurer of the Fidelity Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds. Mr. Robins also serves as President and Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2008-present; 2010-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2004-present). Previously, Mr. Robins served as Deputy Treasurer of the Fidelity funds (2005-2008) and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of The North Carolina Capital Management Trust: Cash and Term Portfolios (2006-2008).

<R>Gary W. Ryan (51)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005</R>

Assistant Treasurer of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Ryan is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Ryan served as Vice President of Fund Reporting in Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) (1999-2005).

<R>Standing Committees of the Funds' Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established various committees to support the Independent Trustees in acting independently in pursuing the best interests of the funds and their shareholders. Currently, the Board of Trustees has three standing committees. The members of each committee are Independent Trustees.</R>

<R>The Operations Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Mr. Wolfe currently serving as Chair. The committee normally meets at least six times a year, or more frequently as called by the Chair, and serves as a forum for consideration of issues of importance to, or calling for particular determinations by, the Independent Trustees. The committee considers matters involving potential conflicts of interest between the funds and FMR and its affiliates and reviews proposed contracts and the proposed continuation of contracts between the funds and FMR and its affiliates, and annually reviews and makes recommendations regarding contracts with third parties unaffiliated with FMR, including insurance coverage and custody agreements. The committee has oversight of compliance issues not specifically within the scope of any other committee. These matters include, but are not limited to, significant non-conformance with contract requirements and other significant regulatory matters and recommending to the Board of Trustees the designation of a person to serve as the funds' CCO. The committee (i) serves as the primary point of contact for the CCO with regard to Board-related functions; (ii) oversees the annual performance review of the CCO; (iii) makes recommendations concerning the CCO's compensation; and (iv) makes recommendations as needed in respect of the removal of the CCO. The committee is also responsible for definitive action on all compliance matters involving the potential for significant reimbursement by FMR. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, the committee held 22 meetings.</R>

<R>The Audit Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Ms. Knowles currently serving as Chair. All committee members must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company's balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. At least one committee member will be an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by the SEC. The committee normally meets four times a year, or more frequently as called by the Chair. The committee meets separately at least annually with the funds' Treasurer, with the funds' Chief Financial Officer (CFO), with personnel responsible for the internal audit function of FMR LLC, and with the funds' outside auditors. The committee has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the outside auditors employed by the funds. The committee assists the Trustees in overseeing and monitoring: (i) the systems of internal accounting and financial controls of the funds and the funds' service providers (to the extent such controls impact the funds' financial statements); (ii) the funds' auditors and the annual audits of the funds' financial statements; (iii) the financial reporting processes of the funds; (iv) whistleblower reports; and (v) the accounting policies and disclosures of the funds. The committee considers and acts upon (i) the provision by any outside auditor of any non-audit services for any fund, and (ii) the provision by any outside auditor of certain non-audit services to fund service providers and their affiliates to the extent that such approval (in the case of this clause (ii)) is required under applicable regulations of the SEC. In furtherance of the foregoing, the committee has adopted (and may from time to time amend or supplement) and provides oversight of policies and procedures for non-audit engagements by outside auditors of the funds. It is responsible for approving all audit engagement fees and terms for the funds and for resolving disagreements between a fund and any outside auditor regarding any fund's financial reporting. Auditors of the funds report directly to the committee. The committee will obtain assurance of independence and objectivity from the outside auditors, including a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the auditor and the funds and any service providers consistent with the rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The committee will receive reports of compliance with provisions of the Auditor Independence Regulations relating to the hiring of employees or former employees of the outside auditors. It oversees and receives reports on the funds' service providers' internal controls and reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of the service providers' accounting and financial controls, including: (i) any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the funds' ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data; (ii) any change in the fund's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the fund's internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) any fraud, whether material or not, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the funds' or service providers internal controls over financial reporting. The committee will also review any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies or published reports that raise material issues regarding the funds' financial statements or accounting policies. These matters may also be reviewed by the Operations Committee. The committee reviews at least annually a report from each outside auditor describing any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control, peer review, or Public Company Accounting Oversight Board examination of the auditing firm and any material issues raised by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities of the auditing firm and in each case any steps taken to deal with such issues. The committee will oversee and receive reports on the funds' financial reporting process, will discuss with FMR, the funds' Treasurer, outside auditors and, if appropriate, internal audit personnel of FMR LLC their qualitative judgments about the appropriateness and acceptability of accounting principles and financial disclosure practices used or proposed for adoption by the funds. The committee will review with FMR, the funds' outside auditor, internal audit personnel of FMR LLC and, as appropriate, legal counsel the results of audits of the funds' financial statements. The committee will review periodically the funds' major internal controls exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and control such exposures. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, the committee held five meetings.</R>

<R>The Governance and Nominating Committee is composed of Messrs. Wolfe (Chair) and Gamper, and Ms. Knowles. The committee meets as called by the Chair. With respect to fund governance and board administration matters, the committee periodically reviews procedures of the Board of Trustees and its committees (including committee charters) and periodically reviews compensation of Independent Trustees. The committee monitors corporate governance matters and makes recommendations to the Board of Trustees on the frequency and structure of the Board of Trustee meetings and on any other aspect of Board procedures. It acts as the administrative committee under the retirement plan for Independent Trustees who retired prior to December 30, 1996 and under the fee deferral plan for Independent Trustees. It reviews the performance of legal counsel employed by the funds and the Independent Trustees. On behalf of the Independent Trustees, the committee will make such findings and determinations as to the independence of counsel for the Independent Trustees as may be necessary or appropriate under applicable regulations or otherwise. The committee is also responsible for Board administrative matters applicable to Independent Trustees, such as expense reimbursement policies and compensation for attendance at meetings, conferences and other events. The committee monitors compliance with, acts as the administrator of, and makes determinations in respect of, the provisions of the code of ethics and any supplemental policies regarding personal securities transactions applicable to the Independent Trustees. The committee monitors the functioning of each Board committee and makes recommendations for any changes, including the creation or elimination of standing or ad hoc Board committees. The committee monitors regulatory and other developments to determine whether to recommend modifications to the committee's responsibilities or other Trustee policies and procedures in light of rule changes, reports concerning "best practices" in corporate governance and other developments in mutual fund governance. The committee meets with Independent Trustees at least once a year to discuss matters relating to fund governance. The committee recommends that the Board establish such special or ad hoc Board committees as may be desirable or necessary from time to time in order to address ethical, legal, or other matters that may arise. The committee also oversees the annual self-evaluation of the Board of Trustees and establishes procedures to allow it to exercise this oversight function. In conducting this oversight, the committee shall address all matters that it considers relevant to the performance of the Board of Trustees and shall report the results of its evaluation to the Board of Trustees, including any recommended amendments to the principles of governance, and any recommended changes to the funds' or the Board of Trustees' policies, procedures, and structures. The committee reviews periodically the size and composition of the Board of Trustees as a whole and recommends, if necessary, measures to be taken so that the Board of Trustees reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity required for the Board as a whole and contains at least the minimum number of Independent Trustees required by law. The committee makes nominations for the election or appointment of Independent Trustees and non-management Members of any Advisory Board, and for membership on committees. The committee shall have authority to retain and terminate any third-party advisers, including authority to approve fees and other retention terms. Such advisers may include search firms to identify Independent Trustee candidates and board compensation consultants. The committee may conduct or authorize investigations into or studies of matters within the committee's scope of responsibilities, and may retain, at the funds' expense, such independent counsel or other advisers as it deems necessary. The committee will consider nominees to the Board of Trustees recommended by shareholders based upon the criteria applied to candidates presented to the committee by a search firm or other source. Recommendations, along with appropriate background material concerning the candidate that demonstrates his or her ability to serve as an Independent Trustee of the funds, should be submitted to the Chair of the committee at the address maintained for communications with Independent Trustees. If the committee retains a search firm, the Chair will generally forward all such submissions to the search firm for evaluation. With respect to the criteria for selecting Independent Trustees, it is expected that all candidates will possess the following minimum qualifications: (i) unquestioned personal integrity; (ii) not an interested person of FMR or its affiliates within the meaning of the 1940 Act; (iii) does not have a material relationship (e.g., commercial, banking, consulting, legal, or accounting) that could create an appearance of lack of independence in respect of FMR and its affiliates; (iv) has the disposition to act independently in respect of FMR and its affiliates and others in order to protect the interests of the funds and all shareholders; (v) ability to attend regularly scheduled Board meetings during the year; (vi) demonstrates sound business judgment gained through broad experience in significant positions where the candidate has dealt with management, technical, financial, or regulatory issues; (vii) sufficient financial or accounting knowledge to add value in the complex financial environment of the funds; (viii) experience on corporate or other institutional oversight bodies having similar responsibilities, but which board memberships or other relationships could not result in business or regulatory conflicts with the funds; and (ix) capacity for the hard work and attention to detail that is required to be an effective Independent Trustee in light of the funds' complex regulatory, operational, and marketing setting. The Governance and Nominating Committee may determine that a candidate who does not have the type of previous experience or knowledge referred to above should nevertheless be considered as a nominee if the Governance and Nominating Committee finds that the candidate has additional qualifications such that his or her qualifications, taken as a whole, demonstrate the same level of fitness to serve as an Independent Trustee. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, the committee held six meetings.</R>

<R>The following table sets forth information describing the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each Trustee in each fund and in all funds in the aggregate within the same fund family overseen by the Trustee for the calendar year ended December 31, 2009.</R>

<R>Interested Trustees</R>

<R>DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Abigail P. Johnson

James C. Curvey</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

none

none</R>

<R>Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

none

none</R>

<R>AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000</R>

<R>Independent Trustees</R>

<R>DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Albert R. Gamper, Jr.

Robert F. Gartland

Arthur E. Johnson

Michael E. Kenneally</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

none

none

none

none</R>

<R>Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

none

none

none

none</R>

<R>AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

none

over $100,000

over $100,000</R>

<R>DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

James H. Keyes

Marie L. Knowles

Kenneth L. Wolfe</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

none

none

none</R>

<R>Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

$10,001 - $50,000

none

none</R>

<R>AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000</R>

<R>The following table sets forth information describing the compensation of each Trustee for his or her services for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, or calendar year ended December 31, 2009, as applicable.</R>

<R>Compensation Table1</R>

<R>AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND

Albert R.
Gamper, Jr.

Robert F.
Gartland2

Arthur E.
Johnson

Michael E.
Kenneally3

James H.
Keyes

Marie L.
Knowles

Kenneth L.
Wolfe

</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

$ 1,345

$ 0

$ 1,337

$ 1,337

$ 1,340

$ 1,431

$ 1,608

</R>

<R>Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

$ 2,542

$ 0

$ 2,528

$ 2,527

$ 2,534

$ 2,707

$ 3,039

</R>

<R>TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEX
A

$ 374,500

$ 0

$ 372,500

$ 372,000

$ 373,500

$ 397,500

$ 447,000

</R>

<R>1 Abigail P. Johnson and James C. Curvey are interested persons and are compensated by FMR.</R>

<R>2 Effective March 1, 2010, Mr. Gartland serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.</R>

<R>3 For the period November 20, 2008 through July 14, 2009, Mr. Kenneally served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective July 15, 2009, Mr. Kenneally serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.</R>

<R>A Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2009 for 188 funds of 29 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash, amounts required to be deferred, and may include amounts deferred at the election of Trustees. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2009, the Trustees accrued required deferred compensation from the funds as follows: Albert R. Gamper, Jr., $162,500; Arthur E. Johnson, $162,500; Michael E. Kenneally, $127,138; James H. Keyes, $162,500; Marie L. Knowles, $175,000; and Kenneth L. Wolfe, $200,000.</R>

<R>As of February 28, 2010, the Trustees and officers of each fund owned, in the aggregate, less than 1% of each fund's total outstanding shares.</R>

<R>As of February 28, 2010, the following owned of record and/or beneficially 5% or more of the outstanding shares of a class or a fund, as applicable:</R>

<R>Fund or Class Name

Owner Name

City

State

Ownership %</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Mancini

San Juan Capo

CA

32.80%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Breen

San Jose

CA

19.74%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Cartotto

Valencia

CA

12.02%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Buettner

Walnut Creek

CA

9.99%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

JP Morgan Chase

Columbus

OH

8.54%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Armanious Trust

Rancho Santa Margarita

CA

8.53%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Pirrone

Torrance

CA

7.18%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Madison Investors LP

Coto De Caza

CA

5.61%</R>

CONTROL OF INVESTMENT ADVISERS

FMR LLC, as successor by merger to FMR Corp., is the ultimate parent company of FMR, Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM), Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (FMR U.K.), Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc. (FMR Japan), and Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC). The voting common shares of FMR LLC are divided into two series. Series B is held predominantly by members of the Edward C. Johnson 3d and Abigail P. Johnson family, directly or through trust and limited liability companies, and is entitled to 49% of the vote on any matter acted upon by the voting common shares. Series A is held predominantly by non-Johnson family member employees of FMR LLC and its affiliates and is entitled to 51% of the vote on any such matter. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders' voting agreement under which all Series B shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B shares. Under the 1940 Act, control of a company is presumed where one individual or group of individuals owns more than 25% of the voting securities of that company. Therefore, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders' voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the 1940 Act, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC.

At present, the primary business activities of FMR LLC and its subsidiaries are: (i) the provision of investment advisory, management, shareholder, investment information and assistance and certain fiduciary services for individual and institutional investors; (ii) the provision of securities brokerage services; (iii) the management and development of real estate; and (iv) the investment in and operation of a number of emerging businesses.

FIL Limited, a Bermuda company formed in 1968, is the ultimate parent company of FIL Investment Advisors (FIIA) and FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd. (FIIA(U.K.)L). Edward C. Johnson 3d, Abigail P. Johnson, other Johnson family members, and various trusts for the benefit of the Johnson family own, directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the voting common stock of FIL Limited. At present, the primary business activities of FIL Limited and its subsidiaries are the provision of investment advisory services to non-U.S. investment companies and private accounts investing in securities throughout the world.

FMR, FIMM, FMR U.K., FMR H.K., FMR Japan, FRAC, FIIA, FIIA(U.K.)L (the Investment Advisers), FDC, and the funds have adopted codes of ethics under Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act that set forth employees' fiduciary responsibilities regarding the funds, establish procedures for personal investing, and restrict certain transactions. Employees subject to the codes of ethics, including Fidelity investment personnel, may invest in securities for their own investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by the funds.

MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS

Each fund has entered into a management contract with FMR, pursuant to which FMR furnishes investment advisory and other services.

Management Services. Under the terms of its management contract with each fund, FMR acts as investment adviser and, subject to the supervision of the Board of Trustees, has overall responsibility for directing the investments of the fund in accordance with its investment objective, policies and limitations. FMR also provides each fund with all necessary office facilities and personnel for servicing the fund's investments, compensates all officers of each fund and all Trustees who are interested persons of the trust or of FMR, and all personnel of each fund or FMR performing services relating to research, statistical and investment activities.

In addition, FMR or its affiliates, subject to the supervision of the Board of Trustees, provide the management and administrative services necessary for the operation of each fund. These services include providing facilities for maintaining each fund's organization; supervising relations with custodians, transfer and pricing agents, accountants, underwriters and other persons dealing with each fund; preparing all general shareholder communications and conducting shareholder relations; maintaining each fund's records and the registration of each fund's shares under federal securities laws and making necessary filings under state securities laws; developing management and shareholder services for each fund; and furnishing reports, evaluations and analyses on a variety of subjects to the Trustees.

Management-Related Expenses (Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund). In addition to the management fee payable to FMR and the fees payable to the transfer agent and pricing and bookkeeping agent, the fund, or each class thereof, as applicable, pays all of its expenses that are not assumed by those parties. The fund pays for the typesetting, printing, and mailing of its proxy materials to shareholders, legal expenses, and the fees of the custodian, auditor, and Independent Trustees. The fund's management contract further provides that the fund will pay for typesetting, printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements of additional information, notices, and reports to shareholders; however, under the terms of the fund's transfer agent agreement, the transfer agent bears these costs. Other expenses paid by the fund include interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, the fund's proportionate share of insurance premiums and Investment Company Institute dues, and the costs of registering shares under federal securities laws and making necessary filings under state securities laws. The fund is also liable for such non-recurring expenses as may arise, including costs of any litigation to which the fund may be a party, and any obligation it may have to indemnify its officers and Trustees with respect to litigation.

Management-Related Expenses (Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund). Under the terms of the fund's management contract, FMR is responsible for payment of all operating expenses of the fund with the exception of the following: interest, taxes, brokerage commissions and other costs with the connection with the purchase or sale of securities and other investment instruments, fees and expenses of the independent trustees, transfer agent fees, Rule 12b-1 fees and other expenses allocable at the class level, and such non-recurring expenses as may arise, including costs of any litigation to which the fund may be a party, and any obligation it may have to indemnify its officers and Trustees with respect to litigation.

FMR and Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund, on behalf of the retail class of the fund, have entered into a 35 Basis Point Expense Contract, which obliges FMR to pay all class-level expenses of the retail class of the fund to limit the total annual operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, securities lending costs, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses) of the retail class to 0.35%. This Expense Contract may not be amended to increase the fees or expenses payable by the retail class except by a vote of a majority of the Board and by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the retail class.

Management Fees. For the services of FMR under the management contract, Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund pays FMR a monthly management fee at the annual rate of 0.20% of the fund's average net assets throughout the month.

The management fee paid to FMR by Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund is reduced by an amount equal to the fees and expenses paid by the fund to the Independent Trustees.

For the services of FMR under the management contract, Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund pays FMR a monthly management fee which has two components: a group fee rate and an individual fund fee rate.

The group fee rate is based on the monthly average net assets of all of the registered investment companies with which FMR has management contracts.

GROUP FEE RATE SCHEDULE

EFFECTIVE ANNUAL FEE RATES

Average Group
Assets

Annualized
Rate

Group Net
Assets

Effective Annual Fee
Rate

0

-

$3 billion

.3700%

$ 1 billion

.3700%

3

-

6

.3400

50

.2188

6

-

9

.3100

100

.1869

9

-

12

.2800

150

.1736

12

-

15

.2500

200

.1652

15

-

18

.2200

250

.1587

18

-

21

.2000

300

.1536

21

-

24

.1900

350

.1494

24

-

30

.1800

400

.1459

30

-

36

.1750

450

.1427

36

-

42

.1700

500

.1399

42

-

48

.1650

550

.1372

48

-

66

.1600

600

.1349

66

-

84

.1550

650

.1328

84

-

120

.1500

700

.1309

120

-

156

.1450

750

.1291

156

-

192

.1400

800

.1275

192

-

228

.1350

850

.1260

228

-

264

.1300

900

.1246

264

-

300

.1275

950

.1233

300

-

336

.1250

1,000

.1220

336

-

372

.1225

1,050

.1209

372

-

408

.1200

1,100

.1197

408

-

444

.1175

1,150

.1187

444

-

480

.1150

1,200

.1177

480

-

516

.1125

1,250

.1167

516

-

587

.1100

1,300

.1158

587

-

646

.1080

1,350

.1149

646

-

711

.1060

1,400

.1141

711

-

782

.1040

1,450

.1132

782

-

860

.1020

1,500

.1125

860

-

946

.1000

1,550

.1117

946

-

1,041

.0980

1,600

.1110

1,041

-

1,145

.0960

1,650

.1103

1,145

-

1,260

.0940

1,700

.1096

1,260

-

1,386

.0920

1,750

.1089

1,386

-

1,525

.0900

1,800

.1083

1,525

-

1,677

.0880

1,850

.1077

1,677

-

1,845

.0860

1,900

.1070

Over

 

1,845

.0840

1,950

.1065

 

 

 

 

2,000

.1059

<R>The group fee rate is calculated on a cumulative basis pursuant to the graduated fee rate schedule shown above on the left. The schedule above on the right shows the effective annual group fee rate at various asset levels, which is the result of cumulatively applying the annualized rates on the left. For example, the effective annual fee rate at $1,271 billion of group net assets - the approximate level for February 2010 - was 0.1163%, which is the weighted average of the respective fee rates for each level of group net assets up to $1,271 billion.</R>

The individual fund fee rate for Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund is 0.25%. Based on the average group net assets of the funds advised by FMR for February 2010, the fund's annual management fee rate would be calculated as follows:

Fund

Group Fee Rate

 

Individual Fund Fee Rate

 

Management Fee Rate

<R>Fidelity California Municipal Money Market

0.1163%

+

0.2500%

=

0.3663%</R>

One-twelfth of the management fee rate is applied to the fund's average net assets for the month, giving a dollar amount which is the fee for that month.

The following table shows the amount of management fees paid by each fund to FMR for the past three fiscal years, and the amount of credits reducing management fees for Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund.

Fund

Fiscal Years
Ended

Amount of
Credits Reducing
Management Fees

Management Fees
Paid to
FMR

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

February 28, 2010

$ 4,605

$ 5,363,108*</R>

<R>

February 28, 2009

$ 384,147

$ 9,561,205*</R>

<R>

February 29, 2008

$ 452,584

$ 9,483,746*</R>

<R>Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

February 28, 2010

--

$ 19,317,814</R>

<R>

February 28, 2009

--

$ 23,011,728</R>

<R>

February 29, 2008

--

$ 19,208,305</R>

* After reduction of fees and expenses paid by the fund to the Independent Trustees.

On April 1, 2007, FMR reduced the management fee rate paid by Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund from 0.43% to 0.20%.

FMR may, from time to time, voluntarily reimburse all or a portion of a fund's or, in the case of a multiple class fund, a class's operating expenses (exclusive of interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses), which is subject to revision or discontinuance. FMR retains the ability to be repaid for these expense reimbursements in the amount that expenses fall below the limit prior to the end of the fiscal year.

Expense reimbursements by FMR will increase a fund's or class's returns and yield, and repayment of the reimbursement by a fund or class will lower its returns and yield.

Sub-Adviser - FIMM. On behalf of each fund, FMR has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with FIMM pursuant to which FIMM has day-to-day responsibility for choosing investments for each fund. Under the terms of the sub-advisory agreements, FMR, and not the funds, pays FIMM's fees.

Sub-Advisers - FIIA and FIIA(U.K.)L. On behalf of each fund, FIMM has entered into a master international fixed-income research agreement with FIIA. On behalf of each fund, FIIA, in turn, has entered into a fixed-income sub-research agreement with FIIA(U.K.)L. Pursuant to the fixed-income research agreements, FIMM may receive investment advice and research services concerning issuers and countries outside the United States. In particular, FIIA and FIIA(U.K.)L will make minimal credit risk and comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S. dollar-denominated securities. Under the terms of the master international fixed-income research agreement, FIMM, and not the funds, pays FIIA. Under the terms of the fixed-income sub-research agreement, FIIA, and not the funds, pays FIIA(U.K.)L.

Sub-Adviser - FRAC. On behalf of each fund, FMR, FIMM, and FRAC have entered into a research agreement. Pursuant to the research agreement, FRAC provides investment advice and research services on domestic issuers. Under the terms of the research agreement, FMR and FIMM, and not the funds, agree, in the aggregate, to pay FRAC.

Sub-Advisers - FMR U.K., FMR H.K., and FMR Japan. On behalf of each fund, FMR has entered into sub-advisory agreements with FMR U.K., FMR H.K., and FMR Japan. Pursuant to the sub-advisory agreements, FMR may receive from the sub-advisers investment research and advice on issuers outside the United States (non-discretionary services) and FMR may grant the sub-advisers investment management authority and the authority to buy and sell securities if FMR believes it would be beneficial to the funds (discretionary services). FMR, and not the funds, pay the sub-advisers.

<R>PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES</R>

<R>The following Proxy Voting Guidelines were established by the Board of Trustees of the funds, after consultation with Fidelity. (The guidelines are reviewed periodically by Fidelity and by the Independent Trustees of the Fidelity funds, and, accordingly, are subject to change.)</R>

<R>I. General Principles</R>

<R> A. Voting of shares will be conducted in a manner consistent with the best interests of Fidelity Fund shareholders as follows: (i) securities of a portfolio company will generally be voted in a manner consistent with the Guidelines; and (ii) voting will be done without regard to any other Fidelity companies' relationship, business or otherwise, with that portfolio company.</R>

<R> B. FMR Investment Proxy Research votes proxies. In the event an Investment Proxy Research employee has a personal conflict with a portfolio company or an employee or director of a portfolio company, that employee will withdraw from making any proxy voting decisions with respect to that portfolio company. A conflict of interest arises when there are factors that may prompt one to question whether a Fidelity employee is acting solely in the best interests of Fidelity and its customers. Employees are expected to avoid situations that could present even the appearance of a conflict between their interests and the interests of Fidelity and its customers.</R>

C. Except as set forth herein, FMR will generally vote in favor of routine management proposals.

<R> D. Non-routine proposals will generally be voted in accordance with the Guidelines.</R>

<R> E. Non-routine proposals not covered by the Guidelines or involving other special circumstances will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from the appropriate FMR analyst or portfolio manager, as applicable, subject to review by an attorney within FMR's General Counsel's office and a member of senior management within FMR Investment Proxy Research. A significant pattern of such proposals or other special circumstances will be referred to the appropriate Fidelity Fund Board Committee or its designee.</R>

<R> F. FMR will vote on shareholder proposals not specifically addressed by the Guidelines based on an evaluation of a proposal's likelihood to enhance the economic returns or profitability of the portfolio company or to maximize shareholder value. Where information is not readily available to analyze the economic impact of the proposal, FMR will generally abstain.</R>

<R> G. Many Fidelity Funds invest in voting securities issued by companies that are domiciled outside the United States and are not listed on a U.S. securities exchange. Corporate governance standards, legal or regulatory requirements and disclosure practices in foreign countries can differ from those in the United States. When voting proxies relating to non-U.S. securities, FMR will generally evaluate proposals in the context of the Guidelines, but FMR may, where applicable and feasible, take into consideration differing laws and regulations in the relevant foreign market in determining how to vote shares.</R>

<R> H. In certain non-U.S. jurisdictions, shareholders voting shares of a portfolio company may be restricted from trading the shares for a period of time around the shareholder meeting date. Because such trading restrictions can hinder portfolio management and could result in a loss of liquidity for a fund, FMR will generally not vote proxies in circumstances where such restrictions apply. In addition, certain non-U.S. jurisdictions require voting shareholders to disclose current share ownership on a fund-by-fund basis. When such disclosure requirements apply, FMR will generally not vote proxies in order to safeguard fund holdings information.</R>

<R> I. Where a management-sponsored proposal is inconsistent with the Guidelines, FMR may receive a company's commitment to modify the proposal or its practice to conform to the Guidelines, and FMR will generally support management based on this commitment. If a company subsequently does not abide by its commitment, FMR will generally withhold authority for the election of directors at the next election.</R>

<R>II. Definitions (as used in this document)</R>

<R> A. Anti-Takeover Provision - includes fair price amendments; classified boards; "blank check" preferred stock; Golden Parachutes; supermajority provisions; Poison Pills; restricting the right to call special meetings; and any other provision that eliminates or limits shareholder rights.</R>

<R> B. Golden Parachute - Employment contracts, agreements, or policies that include an excise tax gross-up provision; single trigger for cash incentives; or may result in a lump sum payment of cash and acceleration of equity that may total more than three times annual compensation (salary and bonus) in the event of a termination following a change in control.</R>

<R> C. Greenmail - payment of a premium to repurchase shares from a shareholder seeking to take over a company through a proxy contest or other means.</R>

<R> D. Sunset Provision - a condition in a charter or plan that specifies an expiration date.</R>

<R> E. Permitted Bid Feature - a provision suspending the application of a Poison Pill, by shareholder referendum, in the event a potential acquirer announces a bona fide offer for all outstanding shares.</R>

<R> F. Poison Pill - a strategy employed by a potential take-over/target company to make its stock less attractive to an acquirer. Poison Pills are generally designed to dilute the acquirer's ownership and value in the event of a take-over.</R>

<R> G. Large-Capitalization Company - a company included in the Russell 1000 stock index.</R>

<R> H. Small-Capitalization Company - a company not included in the Russell 1000 stock index that is not a Micro-Capitalization Company.</R>

<R> I. Micro-Capitalization Company - a company with a market capitalization under US $300 million.</R>

<R> J. Evergreen Provision - a feature which provides for an automatic increase in the shares available for grant under an equity award plan on a regular basis.</R>

<R>III. Directors</R>

<R> A. Incumbent Directors</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of incumbent and nominee directors except where one or more such directors clearly appear to have failed to exercise reasonable judgment.</R>

<R> FMR will also generally withhold authority for the election of all directors or directors on responsible committees if:</R>

<R> 1. An Anti-Takeover Provision was introduced, an Anti-Takeover Provision was extended, or a new Anti-Takeover Provision was adopted upon the expiration of an existing Anti-Takeover Provision, without shareholder approval except as set forth below.</R>

<R> With respect to Poison Pills, however, FMR will consider not withholding authority on the election of directors if all of the following conditions are met when a Poison Pill is introduced, extended, or adopted:</R>

<R> a. The Poison Pill includes a Sunset Provision of less than five years;</R>

<R> b. The Poison Pill includes a Permitted Bid Feature;</R>

<R> c. The Poison Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; and</R>

<R> d. Shareholder approval is required to reinstate the Poison Pill upon expiration.</R>

<R> FMR will also consider not withholding authority on the election of directors when one or more of the conditions above are not met if a board is willing to strongly consider seeking shareholder ratification of, or adding above conditions noted a. and b. to an existing Poison Pill. In such a case, if the company does not take appropriate action prior to the next annual shareholder meeting, FMR will withhold authority on the election of directors.</R>

<R> 2. The company refuses, upon request by FMR, to amend the Poison Pill to allow Fidelity to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a company's total voting securities and of any class of voting securities.</R>

<R> 3. Within the last year and without shareholder approval, a company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options, exchanged outstanding options for equity, or tendered cash for outstanding options.</R>

<R> 4. The company failed to act in the best interests of shareholders when approving executive compensation, taking into account such factors as: (i) whether the company used an independent compensation committee; (ii) whether the compensation committee engaged independent compensation consultants; (iii) whether the company has admitted to or settled a regulatory proceeding relating to options backdating; (iv) whether the compensation committee has lapsed or waived equity vesting restrictions; and (v) whether the company has adopted or extended a Golden Parachute without shareholder approval.</R>

<R> 5. To gain FMR's support on a proposal, the company made a commitment to modify a proposal or practice to conform to the Guidelines and the company has failed to act on that commitment.</R>

<R> 6. The director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the board or its committees on which the director served during the company's prior fiscal year, absent extenuating circumstances.</R>

<R> 7. The board is not composed of a majority of independent directors.</R>

<R> B. Indemnification</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of charter and by-law amendments expanding the indemnification of directors and/or limiting their liability for breaches of care unless FMR is otherwise dissatisfied with the performance of management or the proposal is accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions.</R>

<R> C. Independent Chairperson</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending the appointment of a non-executive or independent chairperson. However, FMR will consider voting for such proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, appointment of a non-executive or independent chairperson appears likely to further the interests of shareholders and to promote effective oversight of management by the board of directors.</R>

<R> D. Majority Director Elections</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals calling for directors to be elected by an affirmative majority of votes cast in a board election, provided that the proposal allows for plurality voting standard in the case of contested elections (i.e., where there are more nominees than board seats). FMR may consider voting against such shareholder proposals where a company's board has adopted an alternative measure, such as a director resignation policy, that provides a meaningful alternative to the majority voting standard and appropriately addresses situations where an incumbent director fails to receive the support of a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election.</R>

<R>IV. Compensation</R>

<R> A. Equity award plans (including stock options, restricted stock awards, and other stock awards).</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote against equity award plans or amendments to authorize additional shares under such plans if:</R>

<R> 1. (a) The dilution effect of the shares outstanding and available for issuance pursuant to all plans, plus any new share requests is greater than 10% for a Large-Capitalization Company, 15% for a Small-Capitalization Company or 20% for a Micro-Capitalization Company; and (b) there were no circumstances specific to the company or the plans that lead FMR to conclude that the level of dilution in the plan or the amendments is acceptable.</R>

<R> 2. In the case of stock option plans, (a) the offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus; (b) the plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options; or (c) the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval.</R>

<R> 3. In the case of stock awards, the restriction period is less than three years for non-performance-based awards, and less than one year for performance-based awards.</R>

<R> 4. The plan includes an Evergreen Provision.</R>

<R> 5. The plan provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.</R>

<R> FMR will consider approving an equity award plan or an amendment to authorize additional shares under such plan if, without complying with the guidelines immediately above, the following two conditions are met:</R>

<R> 1. The shares are granted by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors; and</R>

<R> 2. The shares are limited to 5% (Large-Capitalization Company) and 10% (Small- or Micro-Capitalization Company) of the shares authorized for grant under the plan.</R>

<R> B. Equity Exchanges and Repricing</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of a management proposal to exchange, reprice or tender for cash, outstanding options if the proposed exchange, repricing, or tender offer is consistent with the interests of shareholders, taking into account such factors as:</R>

<R> 1. Whether the proposal excludes senior management and directors;</R>

<R> 2. Whether the exchange or repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable pricing model;</R>

<R> 3. The company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries;</R>

<R> 4. Economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and</R>

<R> 5. Any other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether an exchange or repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.</R>

<R> C. Employee Stock Purchase Plans</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of employee stock purchase plans if the minimum stock purchase price is equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value and the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity. In the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, FMR may permit a lower minimum stock purchase price equal to the prevailing "best practices" in the relevant non-U.S. market, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.</R>

<R> D. Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of non-leveraged ESOPs. For leveraged ESOPs, FMR may examine the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. FMR may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. FMR will generally vote against leveraged ESOPs if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon change in control.</R>

<R> E. Executive Compensation</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote against management proposals on stock-based compensation plans or other compensation plans if such proposals are inconsistent with the interests of shareholders, taking into account such factors as: (i) whether the company has an independent compensation committee; and (ii) whether the compensation committee has authority to engage independent compensation consultants.</R>

<R> F. Bonus Plans and Tax Deductibility Proposals</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of cash and stock incentive plans that are submitted for shareholder approval in order to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, provided that the plan includes well defined and appropriate performance criteria, and with respect to any cash component, that the maximum award per participant is clearly stated and is not unreasonable or excessive.</R>

<R>V. Anti-Takeover Provisions</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote against a proposal to adopt or approve the adoption of an Anti-Takeover Provision unless:</R>

<R> A. The Poison Pill includes the following features:</R>

<R> 1. A Sunset Provision of no greater than five years;</R>

<R> 2. Linked to a business strategy that is expected to result in greater value for the shareholders;</R>

<R> 3. Requires shareholder approval to be reinstated upon expiration or if amended;</R>

<R> 4. Contains a Permitted Bid Feature; and</R>

<R> 5. Allows the Fidelity Funds to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a company's total voting securities and of any class of voting securities.</R>

<R> B. An Anti-Greenmail proposal that does not include other Anti-Takeover Provisions; or</R>

<R> C. It is a fair price amendment that considers a two-year price history or less.</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals to eliminate Anti-Takeover Provisions. In the case of proposals to declassify a board of directors, FMR will generally vote against such a proposal if the issuer's Articles of Incorporation or applicable statutes include a provision whereby a majority of directors may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by written consent, or other reasonable procedures, by a majority of shareholders entitled to vote for the election of directors.</R>

<R>VI. Capital Structure/Incorporation</R>

<R> A. Increases in Common Stock</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote against a provision to increase a company's common stock if such increase will result in a total number of authorized shares greater than three times the current number of outstanding and scheduled to be issued shares, including stock options, except in the case of real estate investment trusts, where an increase that will result in a total number of authorized shares up to five times the current number of outstanding and scheduled to be issued shares is generally acceptable.</R>

<R> B. New Classes of Shares</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote against the introduction of new classes of stock with differential voting rights.</R>

<R> C. Cumulative Voting Rights</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote against the introduction and in favor of the elimination of cumulative voting rights.</R>

<R> D. Acquisition or Business Combination Statutes</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to opt out of the control shares acquisition or business combination statutes.</R>

<R> E. Incorporation or Reincorporation in Another State or Country</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending that a portfolio company reincorporate in the United States and vote in favor of management proposals to reincorporate in a jurisdiction outside the United States if (i) it is lawful under United States, state and other applicable law for the company to be incorporated under the laws of the relevant foreign jurisdiction and to conduct its business and (ii) reincorporating or maintaining a domicile in the United States would likely give rise to adverse tax or other economic consequences detrimental to the interests of the company and its shareholders. However, FMR will consider supporting such shareholder proposals and opposing such management proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, reincorporating in or maintaining a domicile in the relevant foreign jurisdiction gives rise to significant risks or other potential adverse consequences that appear reasonably likely to be detrimental to the interests of the company or its shareholders.</R>

<R>VII. Shares of Investment Companies</R>

<R> A. When a Fidelity Fund invests in an underlying Fidelity Fund with public shareholders, an exchange traded fund (ETF), or non-affiliated fund, FMR will vote in the same proportion as all other voting shareholders of such underlying fund or class ("echo voting"). FMR may choose not to vote if "echo voting" is not operationally feasible.</R>

<R> B. Certain Fidelity Funds may invest in shares of underlying Fidelity Funds which are held exclusively by Fidelity Funds or accounts managed by an FMR or an affiliate. FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees.</R>

<R>VIII. Other</R>

<R> A. Voting Process</R>

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals to adopt confidential voting and independent vote tabulation practices.</R>

<R> B. Regulated Industries</R>

<R> Voting of shares in securities of any regulated industry (e.g. U.S. banking) organization shall be conducted in a manner consistent with conditions that may be specified by the industry's regulator (e.g. the Federal Reserve Board) for a determination under applicable law (e.g. federal banking law) that no fund or group of funds has acquired control of such organization.</R>

<R>To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.</R>

DISTRIBUTION SERVICES

For purposes of the following "Distribution Services" discussion, the term "shares" (as it relates to the funds) means, as applicable, the shares of the non-multiple class fund offered through the prospectus to which this SAI relates or one class of shares of the multiple class fund offered through the prospectus to which this SAI relates.

Each fund has entered into a distribution agreement with FDC, an affiliate of FMR. The principal business address of FDC is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. FDC is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. The distribution agreements call for FDC to use all reasonable efforts, consistent with its other business, to secure purchasers for shares of the funds, which are continuously offered at NAV. Promotional and administrative expenses in connection with the offer and sale of shares are paid by FMR.

The Trustees have approved Distribution and Service Plans with respect to shares of each fund (the Plans) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (the Rule). The Rule provides in substance that a mutual fund may not engage directly or indirectly in financing any activity that is primarily intended to result in the sale of shares of the fund except pursuant to a plan approved on behalf of the fund under the Rule. The Plans, as approved by the Trustees, allow shares of the funds and FMR to incur certain expenses that might be considered to constitute indirect payment by the funds of distribution expenses.

Under each Plan, if the payment of management fees by the fund to FMR is deemed to be indirect financing by the fund of the distribution of its shares, such payment is authorized by the Plan. Each Plan specifically recognizes that FMR may use its management fee revenue, as well as its past profits or its other resources, to pay FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of shares of the fund and/or shareholder support services. In addition, each Plan provides that FMR, directly or through FDC, may pay significant amounts to intermediaries, including retirement plan sponsors, administrators, and service-providers (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees has authorized such payments for shares of the fund.

Prior to approving each Plan, the Trustees carefully considered all pertinent factors relating to the implementation of the Plan, and determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plan will benefit the fund or class, as applicable, and its shareholders. In particular, the Trustees noted that each Plan does not authorize payments by shares of the fund other than those made to FMR under its management contract with the fund. To the extent that each Plan gives FMR and FDC greater flexibility in connection with the distribution of shares of the fund, additional sales of shares of the fund or stabilization of cash flows may result. Furthermore, certain shareholder support services may be provided more effectively under the Plans by local entities with whom shareholders have other relationships.

FDC or an affiliate may compensate, or upon direction make payments for certain retirement plan expenses to, intermediaries, including banks, broker-dealers, retirement plan sponsors, administrators, and service-providers (including affiliates of FDC). A number of factors are considered in determining whether to pay these additional amounts. Such factors may include, without limitation, the level or type of services provided by the intermediary, the level or expected level of assets or sales of shares, the placing of the funds on a preferred or recommended fund list, access to an intermediary's personnel, and other factors. In addition to such payments, FDC or an affiliate may offer other incentives such as sponsorship of educational or client seminars relating to current products and issues, assistance in training and educating the intermediaries' personnel, payments or reimbursements for travel and related expenses associated with due diligence trips that an intermediary may undertake in order to explore possible business relationships with affiliates of FDC, and/or payments of costs and expenses associated with attendance at seminars, including travel, lodging, entertainment, and meals. FDC anticipates that payments will be made to over a hundred intermediaries, including some of the largest broker-dealers and other financial firms, and certain of the payments described above may be significant to an intermediary. As permitted by SEC and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules and other applicable laws and regulations, FDC or an affiliate may pay or allow other incentives or payments to intermediaries.

A fund's transfer agent or an affiliate may also make payments and reimbursements from its own resources to certain intermediaries (who may be affiliated with the transfer agent) for providing recordkeeping and administrative services to plan participants or for providing other services to retirement plans. Please see "Transfer and Service Agent Agreements" in this SAI for more information.

If you have purchased shares of a fund through an investment professional, please speak with your investment professional to learn more about any payments his or her firm may receive from FMR, FDC, and/or their affiliates, as well as fees and/or commissions the investment professional charges. You should also consult disclosures made by your investment professional at the time of purchase.

Any of the payments described in this section may represent a premium over payments made by other fund families. Investment professionals may have an added incentive to sell or recommend a fund or a share class over others offered by competing fund families, or retirement plan sponsors may take these payments into account when deciding whether to include a fund as a plan investment option.

TRANSFER AND SERVICE AGENT AGREEMENTS

For purposes of the following "Transfer and Service Agent Agreements" discussion, the term "shares" (as it relates to the funds) means, as applicable, the shares of the non-multiple class fund offered through the prospectus to which this SAI relates or the one class of shares of the multiple class fund offered through the prospectus to which this SAI relates.

Each class has entered into a transfer agent agreement with Citibank, N.A. (Citibank), which is located at 111 Wall Street, New York, New York. Under the terms of the agreements, Citibank provides transfer agency services for each class. Citibank in turn has entered into sub-transfer agent agreements with FIIOC, an affiliate of FMR, which is located at 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. Under the terms of the sub-agreements, FIIOC performs all processing activities associated with providing these services for each class and receives all related transfer agency fees paid to Citibank.

For providing transfer agency services for Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund, FIIOC receives a position fee and an asset-based fee with respect to each position in the fund. For retail accounts, these fees are based on fund type. For certain institutional accounts, these fees are based on size of position and fund type. For institutional retirement accounts, these fees are based on account type and fund type. The position fee is billed monthly on a pro rata basis at one-twelfth of the applicable annual rate as of the end of each calendar month. The asset-based fee is calculated and paid monthly on the basis of average daily net assets. The position fees are subject to increase based on postage rate changes.

For providing transfer agency services for Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund, FIIOC receives an asset-based fee, calculated and paid monthly on the basis of Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund's average daily net assets, with respect to each account in the fund.

FIIOC also may collect fees charged in connection with providing certain types of services such as exchanges, closing out fund balances, maintaining fund positions with low balances, checkwriting, wire transactions, and providing historical account research.

In addition, Citibank receives the pro rata portion of the transfer agency fees applicable to shareholder accounts in a qualified tuition program (QTP), as defined under the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, managed by FMR or an affiliate and in certain funds of funds managed by an FMR affiliate, according to the percentage of the QTP's, or a fund of funds' assets that is invested in a fund.

FIIOC bears the expense of typesetting, printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements of additional information, and all other reports, notices, and statements to existing shareholders, with the exception of proxy statements.

Many fund shares are owned by intermediaries for the benefit of their customers. Since a fund often does not maintain an account for shareholders in those instances, some or all of the recordkeeping services for these accounts may be performed by third parties. FIIOC or an affiliate may make payments to intermediaries (including affiliates of FIIOC) for recordkeeping and other services.

Retirement plans may also hold fund shares in the name of the plan or its trustee, rather than the plan participant. In situations where FIIOC or an affiliate does not provide recordkeeping services, plan recordkeepers, who may have affiliated financial intermediaries who sell shares of the funds, may, upon direction, be paid for providing recordkeeping services to plan participants. Payments may also be made, upon direction, for other plan expenses. FIIOC may also pay an affiliate for providing services that otherwise would have been performed by FIIOC.

In certain situations where FIIOC or an affiliate provides recordkeeping services to a retirement plan, payments may be made to pay for plan expenses. The amount of such payments may be based on investments in particular Fidelity funds, or may be fixed for a given period of time. Upon direction, payments may be made to plan sponsors, or at the direction of plan sponsors, third parties, for expenses incurred in connection with the plan. FIIOC may also pay an affiliate for providing services that otherwise would have been performed by FIIOC.

Each fund has also entered into a service agent agreement with Citibank. Under the terms of the agreements, Citibank provides pricing and bookkeeping services for each fund. Citibank in turn has entered into sub-service agent agreements with Fidelity Service Company, Inc. (FSC), an affiliate of FMR. Under the terms of the sub-agreements, FSC performs all processing activities associated with providing these services, including calculating the NAV and dividends for shares of each fund and maintaining each fund's portfolio and general accounting records, and receives all related pricing and bookkeeping fees paid to Citibank.

For providing pricing and bookkeeping services, FSC receives a monthly fee based on each fund's average daily net assets throughout the month.

The annual rates for pricing and bookkeeping services for Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund are 0.0156% of the first $500 million of average net assets, 0.0078% of average net assets between $500 million and $10 billion, 0.0041% of average net assets between $10 billion and $25 billion, and 0.0019% of average net assets in excess of $25 billion.

Pricing and bookkeeping fees paid by Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund to FSC for the past three fiscal years are shown in the following table.

Fund

2010

2009

2008

<R>Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund

$ 448,263

$ 527,778

$ 448,912</R>

For Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund, FMR bears the cost of pricing and bookkeeping services under the terms of its management contract with the fund.

DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUST

<R>Trust Organization. Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund and Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund are funds of Fidelity California Municipal Trust II: Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund and Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund, an open-end management investment company created under an initial trust instrument dated June 20, 1991. On August 15, 2005, Spartan® California Municipal Money Market Fund changed its name from Spartan California Municipal Money Market Fund to Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund. Currently, there are two funds offered in Fidelity California Municipal Trust II: Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund and Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund The Trustees are permitted to create additional funds in the trust and to create additional classes of the funds.</R>

The assets of the trust received for the issue or sale of shares of each fund and all income, earnings, profits, and proceeds thereof, subject to the rights of creditors, are allocated to such fund, and constitute the underlying assets of such fund. The underlying assets of each fund in the trust shall be charged with the liabilities and expenses attributable to such fund, except that liabilities and expenses may be allocated to a particular class. Any general expenses of the trust shall be allocated between or among any one or more of the funds or classes.

Shareholder Liability. The trust is a statutory trust organized under Delaware law. Delaware law provides that, except to the extent otherwise provided in the Trust Instrument, shareholders shall be entitled to the same limitations of personal liability extended to stockholders of private corporations for profit organized under the general corporation law of Delaware. The courts of some states, however, may decline to apply Delaware law on this point. The Trust Instrument contains an express disclaimer of shareholder liability for the debts, liabilities, obligations, and expenses of the trust. The Trust Instrument provides that the trust shall not have any claim against shareholders except for the payment of the purchase price of shares and requires that each agreement, obligation, or instrument entered into or executed by the trust or the Trustees relating to the trust or to a fund shall include a provision limiting the obligations created thereby to the trust or to one or more funds and its or their assets. The Trust Instrument further provides that shareholders of a fund shall not have a claim on or right to any assets belonging to any other fund.

The Trust Instrument provides for indemnification out of each fund's property of any shareholder or former shareholder held personally liable for the obligations of the fund solely by reason of his or her being or having been a shareholder and not because of his or her acts or omissions or for some other reason. The Trust Instrument also provides that each fund shall, upon request, assume the defense of any claim made against any shareholder for any act or obligation of the fund and satisfy any judgment thereon. Thus, the risk of a shareholder incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to circumstances in which Delaware law does not apply, no contractual limitation of liability was in effect, and a fund is unable to meet its obligations. FMR believes that, in view of the above, the risk of personal liability to shareholders is extremely remote. Claims asserted against one class of shares may subject holders of another class of shares to certain liabilities.

Voting Rights. Each fund's capital consists of shares of beneficial interest. As a shareholder, you are entitled to one vote for each dollar of net asset value you own. The voting rights of shareholders can be changed only by a shareholder vote. Shares may be voted in the aggregate, by fund, and by class.

The shares have no preemptive or conversion rights. Shares are fully paid and nonassessable, except as set forth under the heading "Shareholder Liability" above.

The trust or a fund or a class may be terminated upon the sale of its assets to, or merger with, another open-end management investment company, series, or class thereof, or upon liquidation and distribution of its assets. The Trustees may reorganize, terminate, merge, or sell all or a portion of the assets of the trust or a fund or a class without prior shareholder approval. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of the trust, shareholders of each of its funds are entitled to receive the underlying assets of such fund available for distribution. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of a fund or a class, shareholders of that fund or that class are entitled to receive the underlying assets of the fund or class available for distribution.

Custodian. Citibank, N.A., 111 Wall Street, New York, New York, is custodian of the assets of the funds. The custodian is responsible for the safekeeping of a fund's assets and the appointment of any subcustodian banks and clearing agencies.

FMR, its officers and directors, its affiliated companies, and Members of the Board of Trustees may, from time to time, conduct transactions with various banks, including banks serving as custodians for certain funds advised by FMR. Transactions that have occurred to date include mortgages and personal and general business loans. In the judgment of FMR, the terms and conditions of those transactions were not influenced by existing or potential custodial or other fund relationships.

<R>Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 125 High Street, Boston, Massachusetts, independent registered public accounting firm, examines financial statements for each fund and provides other audit, tax, and related services.</R>

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Each fund's financial statements and financial highlights for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, and report of the independent registered public accounting firm, are included in the fund's annual report and are incorporated herein by reference. Total annual operating expenses as shown in the prospectus fee table may differ from the ratios of expenses to average net assets in the financial highlights because total annual operating expenses as shown in the prospectus fee table include any acquired fund fees and expenses, whereas the ratios of expenses in the financial highlights do not. Acquired funds include other investment companies (such as central funds or other underlying funds) in which a fund has invested, if and to the extent it is permitted to do so. Total annual operating expenses in the prospectus fee table and the financial highlights do not include any expenses associated with investments in certain structured or synthetic products that may rely on the exception from the definition of "investment company" provided by section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act.

FUND HOLDINGS INFORMATION

Each fund views holdings information as sensitive and limits its dissemination. The Board authorized FMR to establish and administer guidelines for the dissemination of fund holdings information, which may be amended at any time without prior notice. FMR's Disclosure Policy Committee (comprising executive officers of FMR) evaluates disclosure policy with the goal of serving a fund's best interests by striking an appropriate balance between providing information about a fund's portfolio and protecting a fund from potentially harmful disclosure. The Board reviews the administration and modification of these guidelines and receives reports from the fund's chief compliance officer periodically.

Each fund will provide a full list of holdings as of the end of the fund's fiscal quarter on www.fidelity.com 60 days after its fiscal quarter-end. Each fund's full holdings are also available monthly, 15 or more days after month-end by calling Fidelity at 1-800-544-8544.

This information will be available on the web site until updated for the next applicable period.

Each fund may from time to time make full holdings available more frequently, including daily, if such disclosure is determined by FMR to be in the interest of fund shareholders. A fund may also from time to time provide or make available to third parties upon request specific fund level performance attribution information and statistics, or holdings information with respect to a specific security or company. Third parties may include fund shareholders or prospective fund shareholders, members of the press, consultants, and ratings and ranking organizations.

The Use of Holdings In Connection With Fund Operations. Material non-public holdings information may be provided as part of the investment activities of each fund to: entities which, by explicit agreement or by virtue of their respective duties to the fund, are required to maintain the confidentiality of the information disclosed; other parties if legally required; or persons FMR believes will not misuse the disclosed information. These entities, parties, and persons include: a fund's trustees; a fund's manager, its sub-advisers and their affiliates whose access persons are subject to a code of ethics; contractors who are subject to a confidentiality agreement; a fund's auditors; a fund's custodians; proxy voting service providers; financial printers; pricing service vendors; broker-dealers in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or requests for price quotations or bids on one or more securities; securities lending agents; counsel to a fund or their Independent Trustees; regulatory authorities; stock exchanges and other listing organizations; parties to litigation; and third-parties in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding relating to a fund holding. Non-public holdings information may also be provided to an issuer regarding the number or percentage of its shares that are owned by a fund and in connection with redemptions in kind.

Other Uses Of Holdings Information. In addition, each fund may provide material non-public holdings information to (i) third-parties that calculate information derived from holdings for use by FMR or its affiliates, (ii) third parties that supply their analyses of holdings (but not the holdings themselves) to their clients (including sponsors of retirement plans or their consultants), (iii) ratings and rankings organizations, and (iv) an investment adviser, trustee, or their agents to whom holdings are disclosed for due diligence purposes or in anticipation of a merger involving a fund. Each individual request is reviewed by the Disclosure Policy Committee which must find, in its sole discretion that, based on the specific facts and circumstances, the disclosure appears unlikely to be harmful to a fund. Entities receiving this information must have in place control mechanisms to reasonably ensure or otherwise agree that, (a) the holdings information will be kept confidential, (b) no employee shall use the information to effect trading or for their personal benefit, and (c) the nature and type of information that they, in turn, may disclose to third-parties is limited. FMR relies primarily on the existence of non-disclosure agreements and/or control mechanisms when determining that disclosure is not likely to be harmful to a fund.

At this time, the entities receiving information described in the preceding paragraph are: Factset Research Systems Inc. (full or partial fund holdings daily, on the next business day); Thomson Vestek (full holdings, as of the end of the calendar quarter, 15 calendar days after the calendar quarter-end); Standard & Poor's Rating Services (full holdings weekly (generally as of the previous Friday), generally 5 business days thereafter); Moody's Investors Service (full holdings monthly, (generally as of the last Friday of each month), generally the first Friday of the following month); Anacomp Inc. (full or partial holdings daily, on the next business day); and MSCI Inc. and certain affiliates (full or partial fund holdings daily, on the next business day).

FMR, its affiliates, or the funds will not enter into any arrangements with third-parties from which they derive consideration for the disclosure of material non-public holdings information. If, in the future, FMR desired to make such an arrangement, it would seek prior Board approval and any such arrangements would be disclosed in the funds' SAI.

There can be no assurance that the funds' policies and procedures with respect to disclosure of fund portfolio holdings will prevent the misuse of such information by individuals and firms that receive such information.

APPENDIX

Fidelity, Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design, and Spartan are registered trademarks of FMR LLC.

The third party marks appearing above are the marks of their respective owners.

Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

Class/Ticker

Institutional/FSBXX

Prospectus

April 29, 2010


fid120565


Contents

Fund Summary

<Click Here>

 

Fund Basics

<Click Here>

Investment Details

 

<Click Here>

Valuing Shares

Shareholder Information

<Click Here>

Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares

 

<Click Here>

Converting Shares

 

<Click Here>

Exchanging Shares

 

<Click Here>

Account Features and Policies

 

<Click Here>

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

 

<Click Here>

Tax Consequences

Fund Services

<Click Here>

Fund Management

 

<Click Here>

Fund Distribution

Appendix

<Click Here>

Financial Highlights

Prospectus


Fund Summary

Fund/Class:
Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund/Institutional

Investment Objective

The fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

Fee Table

The following table describes the fees and expenses that may be incurred when you buy and hold shares of the fund.

Shareholder fees (fees paid directly from your investment)

None

Annual class operating expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your investment)

<R>Management fee

0.20%</R>

<R>Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

None</R>

<R>Other expenses

0.09%</R>

<R>Total annual operating expenses

0.29%</R>

<R>Expense reimbursement

0.05%</R>

<R>Total annual operating expenses after expense reimbursementA

0.24%</R>

<R>A Effective April 17, 2007, Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) has contractually agreed to reimburse Institutional Class of the fund to the extent that total operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses, if any), as a percentage of its average net assets, exceed 0.20%. FMR may not discontinue or modify this arrangement without the approval of the Board of Trustees. This arrangement will remain in effect for at least one year from the effective date of the prospectus, and will remain in effect thereafter unless discontinued with the approval of the Board of Trustees.</R>

This example helps compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.

Let's say, hypothetically, that the annual return for shares of the fund is 5% and that your shareholder fees and the annual operating expenses for shares of the fund are exactly as described in the fee table. This example illustrates the effect of fees and expenses, but is not meant to suggest actual or expected fees and expenses or returns, all of which may vary. For every $10,000 you invested, here's how much you would pay in total expenses if you sell all of your shares at the end of each time period indicated:

<R>1 year

$ 25</R>

<R>3 years

$ 77</R>

<R>5 years

$ 135</R>

<R>10 years

$ 306</R>

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in municipal money market securities.
  • Normally investing at least 80% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes.
  • Potentially investing up to 20% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to California personal income tax.
  • Normally not investing in municipal securities whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.
  • Potentially investing more than 25% of total assets in municipal securities that finance similar types of projects.
  • Investing in compliance with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds for the quality, maturity, and diversification of investments.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Municipal Market Volatility. The municipal market is volatile and can be significantly affected by adverse tax, legislative, or political changes and the financial condition of the issuers of municipal securities.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure that are located in foreign countries can be affected by adverse political, regulatory, market, or economic developments in those countries.
  • Geographic Concentration. Unfavorable political or economic conditions within California can affect the credit quality of issuers located in that state.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or a provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease.

An investment in the fund is not a deposit of a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

Performance

The following information is intended to help you understand the risks of investing in the fund. The information illustrates the changes in the performance of the fund's shares from year to year. Past performance is not necessarily an indication of future performance.

Visit www.fidelity.com or www.advisor.fidelity.com for updated return information.

Prospectus

Year-by-Year Returns

<R>Calendar Years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

2009</R>

<R>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.96%

0.25%</R>

<R>fid120614</R>

<R>During the periods shown in the chart:

Returns

Quarter ended</R>

<R>Highest Quarter Return

0.62%

March 31, 2008</R>

<R>Lowest Quarter Return

0.03%

December 31, 2009</R>

<R>Year-to-Date Return

0.02%

March 31, 2010</R>

Average Annual Returns

<R>For the periods ended
December 31, 2009

Past 1
year

Life of
class
A </R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

 

</R>

  <R>Institutional Class

0.25%

1.73%</R>

<R>A From April 18, 2007.</R>

Investment Advisers

Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) is the fund's manager. Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) and other affiliates of FMR serve as sub-advisers for the fund.

Purchase and Sale of Shares

You may buy or sell Institutional Class shares of the fund through a Fidelity brokerage or mutual fund account, or through an investment professional. You may buy or sell shares in various ways:

Internet

www.fidelity.com or www.advisor.fidelity.com

Phone

Fidelity Automated Service Telephone (FAST®) 1-800-544-5555

To reach a Fidelity representative 1-800-544-6666

Mail

Additional purchases:

Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003

Redemptions:

Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035

TDD - Service for the Deaf and Hearing Impaired

1-800-544-0118

The price to buy one share of Institutional Class is its net asset value per share (NAV). Your shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form.

The price to sell one share of Institutional Class is its NAV. Your shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form.

The fund is open for business each day the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is open. Even if the NYSE is closed, the fund will be open for business on those days on which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (New York Fed) is open, the primary trading markets for the fund's portfolio instruments are open, and the fund's management believes there is an adequate market to meet purchase and redemption requests.

The fund has a minimum initial investment of $1,000,000.

Tax Information

The fund seeks to earn income and pay dividends exempt from federal income tax and California personal income tax. A portion of the dividends you receive may be subject to federal, state, or local income tax. You may also receive taxable distributions attributable to the fund's sale of municipal bonds.

Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries

<R>The fund, FMR, Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC), and/or their affiliates may pay intermediaries, including a bank, broker-dealer, or other service-provider (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), for the sale of fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing your intermediary and your investment professional to recommend the fund over another investment. Ask your investment professional or visit your intermediary's web site for more information.</R>

Prospectus


Fund Basics

Investment Details

Investment Objective

The fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

Principal Investment Strategies

FMR normally invests the fund's assets in municipal money market securities.

FMR normally invests at least 80% of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes. Municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes include securities issued by U.S. territories and possessions, such as Guam, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico, and their political subdivisions and public corporations.

FMR may invest up to 20% of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to California personal income tax under normal circumstances. FMR does not currently intend to invest the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

The supply of and demand for municipal money market securities can vary from time to time. When FMR believes that suitable municipal money market securities are not available, or during other unusual market conditions, FMR may leave a significant portion of the fund's assets uninvested, or may invest up to 20% of the fund's assets in securities subject to state and/or federal income tax.

FMR may invest more than 25% of the fund's total assets in municipal securities that finance similar projects, such as those relating to education, health care, housing, transportation, and utilities.

In buying and selling securities for the fund, FMR complies with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds regarding the quality, maturity, and diversification of the fund's investments. FMR may invest the fund's assets in municipal money market securities by investing in other funds. FMR stresses maintaining a stable $1.00 share price, liquidity, and income.

Description of Principal Security Types

Money market securities are high-quality, short-term securities that pay a fixed, variable, or floating interest rate. Securities are often specifically structured so that they are eligible investments for a money market fund. For example, in order to satisfy the maturity restrictions for a money market fund, some money market securities have demand or put features, which have the effect of shortening the security's maturity. Municipal money market securities include variable rate demand notes, commercial paper, and municipal notes.

Municipal securities are issued to raise money for a variety of public and private purposes, including general financing for state and local governments, or financing for a specific project or public facility. Municipal securities may be fully or partially backed by the local government, by the credit of a private issuer, by the current or anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets, or by domestic or foreign entities providing credit support such as letters of credit, guarantees, or insurance.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Principal Investment Risks

Many factors affect the fund's performance. Because FMR concentrates the fund's investments in California, the fund's performance is expected to be closely tied to economic and political conditions within that state and to be more volatile than the performance of a more geographically diversified fund.

The fund's yield will change daily based on changes in interest rates and other market conditions. Although the fund is managed to maintain a stable $1.00 share price, there is no guarantee that the fund will be able to do so. For example, a major increase in interest rates or a decrease in the credit quality of the issuer of one of the fund's investments could cause the fund's share price to decrease.

The following factors can significantly affect the fund's performance:

Municipal Market Volatility. Municipal securities can be significantly affected by political changes as well as uncertainties in the municipal market related to taxation, legislative changes, or the rights of municipal security holders. Because many municipal securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care, transportation, and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect the overall municipal market. In addition, changes in the financial condition of an individual municipal insurer can affect the overall municipal market, and market conditions may directly impact the liquidity and valuation of municipal securities.

Interest Rate Changes. Money market securities have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. In general, the price of a money market security can fall when interest rates rise and can rise when interest rates fall. Securities with longer maturities can be more sensitive to interest rate changes. Short-term securities tend to react to changes in short-term interest rates.

Foreign Exposure. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure that are located in foreign countries can involve increased risks. Extensive public information about the provider may not be available and unfavorable political, economic, or governmental developments could affect the value of the security.

<R>Geographic Concentration. California is continuing to experience financial difficulties due to the ongoing economic crisis. The deterioration of California's fiscal situation increases the risk of investing in California municipal securities, including the risk of greater volatility and potential issuer default. Several rating agencies have recently downgraded California's general obligation bond rating. Further downgrades could result in a reduction in the market value of California municipal securities.</R>

Issuer-Specific Changes. Changes in the financial condition of an issuer or counterparty, changes in specific economic or political conditions that affect a particular type of issuer, and changes in general economic or political conditions can increase the risk of default by an issuer or counterparty, which can affect a security's or instrument's credit quality or value. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure also can be affected by these types of changes. Municipal securities backed by current or anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the project or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determines an issuer of a municipal security has not complied with applicable tax requirements, interest from the security could become taxable and the security could decline significantly in value. In addition, if the structure of a security fails to function as intended, interest from the security could become taxable or the security could decline in value.

Prospectus

Generally, the fund purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the opinion of bond counsel, is free from federal income tax and from the federal alternative minimum tax. Neither FMR nor the fund guarantees that this opinion is correct, and there is no assurance that the IRS will agree with bond counsel's opinion. Issuers or other parties generally enter into covenants requiring continuing compliance with federal tax requirements to preserve the tax-free status of interest payments over the life of the security. If at any time the covenants are not complied with, or if the IRS otherwise determines that the issuer did not comply with relevant tax requirements, interest payments from a security could become federally taxable, possibly retroactively to the date the security was issued. For certain types of structured securities, the tax status of the pass-through of tax-free income may also be based on the federal and state tax treatment of the structure.

In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, FMR may temporarily use a different investment strategy (including leaving a significant portion of a fund's assets uninvested) for defensive purposes. Uninvested assets do not earn income for a fund, which may have a significant negative impact on the fund's yield and may prevent the fund from achieving its investment objective. In addition, different factors could affect the fund's performance, and the fund could distribute income subject to federal or California personal income tax.

Fundamental Investment Policies

The following policies are fundamental, that is, subject to change only by shareholder approval:

The fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal income tax. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from California personal income tax.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Valuing Shares

The fund is open for business each day the NYSE is open. Even if the NYSE is closed, the fund will be open for business on those days on which the New York Fed is open, the primary trading markets for the fund's portfolio instruments are open, and the fund's management believes there is an adequate market to meet purchase and redemption requests.

A class's NAV is the value of a single share. Fidelity normally calculates the class's NAV as of the close of business of the NYSE, normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. The fund's assets normally are valued as of this time for the purpose of computing the class's NAV.

NAV is not calculated and the fund will not process purchase and redemption requests submitted on days when the fund is not open for business. The time at which shares are priced and until which purchase and redemption orders are accepted may be changed as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

To the extent that the fund's assets are traded in other markets on days when the fund is not open for business, the value of the fund's assets may be affected on those days. In addition, trading in some of the fund's assets may not occur on days when the fund is open for business.

The fund's assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost.

Prospectus


Shareholder Information

Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares

General Information

Fidelity Investments was established in 1946 to manage one of America's first mutual funds. Today, Fidelity is the largest mutual fund company in the country, and is known as an innovative provider of high-quality financial services to individuals and institutions.

In addition to its mutual fund business, the company operates one of America's leading brokerage firms, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC. Fidelity is also a leader in providing tax-advantaged retirement plans for individuals investing on their own or through their employer.

You may buy or sell shares of a fund through a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account. If you buy or sell shares of a fund (other than by exchange) through a Fidelity brokerage account, your transactions generally involve your Fidelity brokerage core (a settlement vehicle included as part of your Fidelity brokerage account).

If you do not currently have a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account and would like to invest in a fund, you may need to complete an application. For more information about a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account, please visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com, call 1-800-FIDELITY, or visit a Fidelity Investor Center (call 1-800-544-9797 for the center nearest you).

You may also buy or sell shares of Institutional Class through an investment professional. If you buy or sell shares of Institutional Class through an investment professional, the procedures for buying, selling, and exchanging shares of Institutional Class and the account features and policies may differ from those discussed in this prospectus. Fees in addition to those discussed in this prospectus may also apply. For example, you may be charged a transaction fee if you buy or sell shares of Institutional Class through a non-Fidelity broker or other investment professional.

You should include the following information with any order to buy, sell, convert, or exchange shares:

  • Your name;
  • Your account number;
  • Name of fund and class whose shares you want to buy, sell, or convert; and
  • Dollar amount or number of shares you want to buy, sell, or convert.

Certain methods of contacting Fidelity, such as by telephone or electronically, may be unavailable or delayed (for example, during periods of unusual market activity). In addition, the level and type of service available may be restricted based on criteria established by Fidelity.

The fund may reject for any reason, or cancel as permitted or required by law, any purchase or exchange, including transactions deemed to represent excessive trading, at any time.

Excessive trading of fund shares can harm shareholders in various ways, including reducing the returns to long-term shareholders by increasing costs to the fund (such as spreads paid to dealers who sell money market instruments to a fund) and disrupting portfolio management strategies.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

FMR anticipates that shareholders will purchase and sell shares of the fund frequently because a money market fund is designed to offer investors a liquid cash option. Accordingly, the Board of Trustees has not adopted policies and procedures designed to discourage excessive trading of money market fund shares and the fund accommodates frequent trading.

The fund may in its discretion restrict, reject, or cancel any purchases or exchanges that, in FMR's opinion, may be disruptive to the management of the fund or otherwise not be in the fund's interests.

The fund has no limit on purchase or exchange transactions. The fund reserves the right at any time to restrict purchases or exchanges or impose conditions that are more restrictive on excessive or disruptive trading than those stated in this prospectus.

Buying Shares

The price to buy one share of Institutional Class is its NAV. Institutional Class shares are sold without a sales charge.

Your shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form.

The fund has authorized certain intermediaries to accept orders to buy shares on its behalf. When authorized intermediaries receive an order in proper form, the order is considered as being placed with the fund, and shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after the order is received by the authorized intermediary. Orders by funds of funds for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment manager will be treated as received by the fund at the same time that the corresponding orders are received in proper form by the funds of funds.

The fund may stop offering shares completely or may offer shares only on a limited basis, for a period of time or permanently.

If your payment is not received and collected, your purchase may be canceled and you could be liable for any losses or fees the fund or Fidelity has incurred.

If when you place your wire purchase order you indicate that Fidelity will receive your wire that day, your wire must be received in proper form by Fidelity at the applicable fund's designated wire bank before the close of the Federal Reserve Wire System on the day of purchase.

Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, purchase orders may be suspended, restricted, or canceled and the monies may be withheld.

Selling Shares

The price to sell one share of Institutional Class is its NAV.

Your shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form. Normally, redemptions will be processed by the next business day, but it may take up to seven days to pay the redemption proceeds if making immediate payment would adversely affect the fund.

Prospectus

The fund has authorized certain intermediaries to accept orders to sell shares on its behalf. When authorized intermediaries receive an order in proper form, the order is considered as being placed with the fund, and shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after the order is received by the authorized intermediary. Orders by funds of funds for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment manager will be treated as received by the fund at the same time that the corresponding orders are received in proper form by the funds of funds.

A signature guarantee is designed to protect you and Fidelity from fraud. If you submit your request to Fidelity by mail, Fidelity may require that your request be made in writing and include a signature guarantee in certain circumstances, such as:

  • When the address on your account (record address) has changed within the last 15 days or you are requesting that a check be mailed to an address different than the record address;
  • When you are requesting that redemption proceeds be paid to someone other than the account owner; or
  • In certain situations when the redemption proceeds are being transferred to a Fidelity account with a different registration.

You should be able to obtain a signature guarantee from a bank, broker (including Fidelity Investor Centers), dealer, credit union (if authorized under state law), securities exchange or association, clearing agency, or savings association. A notary public cannot provide a signature guarantee.

When you place an order to sell shares, note the following:

  • If you are selling some but not all of your shares, keep your fund balance above the required minimum to keep your fund position open, except fund positions not subject to balance minimums.
  • You are advised to place your trades as early in the day as possible and to provide Fidelity with advance notice of large redemptions.
  • Redemption proceeds (other than exchanges) may be delayed until money from prior purchases sufficient to cover your redemption has been received and collected. This can take up to seven business days after a purchase.
  • Redemptions may be suspended or payment dates postponed when the NYSE is closed (other than weekends or holidays), when trading on the NYSE is restricted, or as permitted by the SEC.
  • Redemption proceeds may be paid in securities or other property rather than in cash if FMR determines it is in the best interests of the fund.
  • If you sell shares of Institutional Class by writing a check, if available, and the amount of the check is greater than the value of your fund position, your check will be returned to you and you may be subject to additional charges.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

  • You will not receive interest on amounts represented by uncashed redemption checks.
  • If you hold your shares in a Fidelity mutual fund account and your redemption check remains uncashed for more than one year, the check may be invested in additional shares of the fund at the NAV next calculated on the day of the investment.
  • Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, redemption requests may be suspended, restricted, canceled, or processed and the proceeds may be withheld.

Converting Shares

You may convert Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares, a class of shares of the fund that is not offered through this prospectus, to Institutional Class shares at any time, provided that you meet the eligibility requirements for Institutional Class. You may contact Fidelity by telephone or by mail to request a conversion.

A conversion will be based on the respective NAVs of the two classes, without the imposition of any fees, on the trade date of the conversion. A conversion between share classes of the same fund is a non-taxable event.

Conversions to Institutional Class shares may not be available if your account is held through an investment professional or other financial intermediary, such as a bank, broker-dealer, insurance company, third-party administrator, or registered investment adviser. Please contact your investment professional or financial intermediary to determine if Institutional Class shares are available and to learn about other rules that may apply.

The fund may conduct periodic reviews of account balances and may convert your Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares to Institutional Class shares if you meet the eligibility requirements for Institutional Class. Automatic conversions between Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares and Institutional Class shares generally are not available to accounts held through investment professionals or other financial intermediaries.

If you no longer meet the minimum balance requirements for Institutional Class, for any reason, the fund may convert your Institutional Class shares to Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares. Investors will be notified in writing before any such conversion to Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund shares.

<R>A conversion will be based on the respective NAVs of the two classes, without the imposition of any fees, on the trade date of the conversion. A conversion between share classes of the same fund is a non-taxable event.</R>

Exchanging Shares

An exchange involves the redemption of all or a portion of the shares of one fund and the purchase of shares of another fund.

Prospectus

As an Institutional Class shareholder, you have the privilege of exchanging Institutional Class shares of a fund for any class of a Fidelity money market fund or for shares of other Fidelity funds.

However, you should note the following policies and restrictions governing exchanges:

  • The fund may refuse any exchange purchase for any reason. For example, the fund may refuse exchange purchases by any person or group if, in FMR's judgment, the fund would be unable to invest the money effectively in accordance with its investment objective and policies, or would otherwise potentially be adversely affected.
  • Before exchanging into a fund or class, read its prospectus.
  • The fund or class you are exchanging into must be available for sale in your state.
  • Exchanges may have tax consequences for you.
  • If you are exchanging between accounts that are not registered in the same name, address, and taxpayer identification number (TIN), there may be additional requirements.
  • Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, exchange requests may be suspended, restricted, canceled, or processed and the proceeds may be withheld.

The fund may terminate or modify exchange privileges in the future.

Other funds may have different exchange restrictions and minimums, and may impose redemption fees of up to 2.00% of the amount exchanged. Check each fund's prospectus for details.

Account Features and Policies

Features

The following features may be available to buy and sell shares of the fund. Visit www.fidelity.com or www.advisor.fidelity.com, or contact your investment professional for more information.

Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House

  • To transfer money between a bank account and a Fidelity brokerage account or Fidelity mutual fund account.
  • You can use electronic funds transfer to:
- Make periodic (automatic) purchases of Fidelity fund shares or payments to your Fidelity brokerage account.
- Make periodic (automatic) redemptions of Fidelity fund shares or withdrawals from your Fidelity brokerage account.

Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system

  • To transfer money between a bank account and your fund account.

Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions

  • To directly deposit all or a portion of your compensation from your employer (or the U.S. Government, in the case of Social Security) into a Fidelity brokerage account or Fidelity mutual fund account.
  • To sell shares of a Fidelity money market fund and simultaneously to buy shares of another Fidelity fund in a Fidelity mutual fund account.

Checkwriting

  • To sell Fidelity fund shares from your Fidelity mutual fund account or withdraw money from your Fidelity brokerage account.

Policies

The following policies apply to you as a shareholder.

Statements that Fidelity sends to you include the following:

  • Confirmation statements (after transactions affecting your fund balance except reinvestment of distributions in the fund).
  • Monthly or quarterly account statements (detailing fund balances and all transactions completed during the prior month or quarter).

To reduce expenses, only one copy of most financial reports and prospectuses may be mailed, even if more than one person in a household holds shares of the fund. Call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098 if you need additional copies of financial reports or prospectuses. If you do not want the mailing of these documents to be combined with those for other members of your household, call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098.

Electronic copies of most financial reports and prospectuses are available at Fidelity's web site. To participate in Fidelity's electronic delivery program, call Fidelity or visit Fidelity's web site for more information.

You may initiate many transactions by telephone or electronically. Fidelity will not be responsible for any loss, cost, expense, or other liability resulting from unauthorized transactions if it follows reasonable security procedures designed to verify the identity of the investor. Fidelity will request personalized security codes or other information, and may also record calls. For transactions conducted through the Internet, Fidelity recommends the use of an Internet browser with 128-bit encryption. You should verify the accuracy of your confirmation statements upon receipt and notify Fidelity immediately of any discrepancies in your account activity. If you do not want the ability to sell and exchange by telephone, call Fidelity for instructions. Additional documentation may be required from corporations, associations, and certain fiduciaries.

Prospectus

When you sign your account application, you will be asked to certify that your social security or taxpayer identification number (TIN) is correct and that you are not subject to backup withholding for failing to report income to the IRS. If you violate IRS regulations, the IRS can require the fund to withhold an amount subject to the applicable backup withholding rate from your taxable distributions and redemptions.

You may also be asked to provide additional information in order for Fidelity to verify your identity in accordance with requirements under anti-money laundering regulations. Accounts may be restricted and/or closed, and the monies withheld, pending verification of this information or as otherwise required under these and other federal regulations.

If your fund balance falls below $1,000,000 worth of shares for any reason and you do not increase your balance, Fidelity may sell all of your shares and send the proceeds to you after providing you with at least 30 days' notice to reestablish the minimum balance. Your shares will be sold at the NAV on the day Fidelity closes your fund position. Certain fund positions are not subject to these balance requirements and will not be closed for failure to maintain a minimum balance.

Fidelity may charge a fee for certain services, such as providing historical account documents.

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

The fund earns interest, dividends, and other income from its investments, and distributes this income (less expenses) to shareholders as dividends. The fund may also realize capital gains from its investments, and distributes these gains (less losses), if any, to shareholders as capital gain distributions.

Distributions you receive from the fund consist primarily of dividends. The fund normally declares dividends daily and pays them monthly.

You may request to have dividends relating to Institutional Class shares redeemed from an account closed during the month paid when the account is closed. The fund reserves the right to limit this service.

Earning Dividends

Institutional Class shares purchased by a wire order prior to 12:00 noon Eastern time, with receipt of the wire in proper form before the close of the Federal Reserve Wire System on that day, generally begin to earn dividends on the day of purchase.

Institutional Class shares purchased by all other orders generally begin to earn dividends on the first business day following the day of purchase.

Institutional Class shares redeemed by a wire order prior to 12:00 noon Eastern time, generally earn dividends through the day prior to the day of redemption.

Institutional Class shares redeemed by all other orders generally earn dividends until, but not including, the next business day following the day of redemption.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

Exchange requests will be processed only when both funds are open for business.

Distribution Options

When you open an account, specify on your application how you want to receive your distributions. The following distribution options are available for Institutional Class:

1. Reinvestment Option. Your dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, will be automatically reinvested in additional Institutional Class shares of the fund. If you do not indicate a choice on your application, you will be assigned this option.

2. Cash Option. Your dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, will be paid in cash.

3. Directed Dividends® Option. Your dividends will be automatically invested in shares of another identically registered Fidelity fund. Your capital gain distributions, if any, will be automatically invested in shares of another identically registered Fidelity fund, automatically reinvested in additional Institutional Class shares, or paid in cash.

Not all distribution options are available for every account. If the option you prefer is not listed on your account application, or if you want to change your current option, contact your investment professional directly or call Fidelity.

If you elect to receive distributions paid in cash by check and the U.S. Postal Service does not deliver your checks, your distribution option may be converted to the Reinvestment Option. You will not receive interest on amounts represented by uncashed distribution checks.

Tax Consequences

As with any investment, your investment in the fund could have tax consequences for you.

The fund seeks to earn income and pay dividends exempt from federal income tax and California personal income tax.

A portion of the dividends you receive may be subject to federal, state, or local income tax. You may also receive taxable distributions attributable to the fund's sale of municipal bonds.

For federal tax purposes, certain of the fund's distributions, including distributions of short-term capital gains and gains on the sale of bonds characterized as market discount, are taxable to you as ordinary income, while the fund's distributions of long-term capital gains, if any, are taxable to you generally as capital gains.

For California personal income tax purposes, distributions derived from interest on municipal securities of California issuers and from interest on qualifying securities issued by U.S. territories and possessions are generally exempt from tax. Distributions that are federally taxable as ordinary income or capital gains are generally subject to California personal income tax.

Any taxable distributions you receive from the fund will normally be taxable to you when you receive them, regardless of your distribution option. If you elect to receive distributions in cash or to invest distributions automatically in shares of another Fidelity fund, you will receive certain December distributions in January, but those distributions will be taxable as if you received them on December 31.

Prospectus


Fund Services

Fund Management

The fund is a mutual fund, an investment that pools shareholders' money and invests it toward a specified goal.

FMR is the fund's manager. The address of FMR and its affiliates, unless otherwise indicated below, is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

<R>As of December 31, 2009, FMR had approximately $1.3 billion in discretionary assets under management.</R>

As the manager, FMR has overall responsibility for directing the fund's investments and handling its business affairs.

FIMM serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. FIMM has day-to-day responsibility for choosing investments for the fund.

<R>FIMM is an affiliate of FMR. As of December 31, 2009, FIMM had approximately $639.1 billion in discretionary assets under management.</R>

Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC), an affiliate of FMR, was organized in 1986. FRAC serves as a sub-adviser for the fund and may provide investment research and advice for the fund.

Affiliates assist FMR with foreign investments:

  • <R>Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (FMR U.K.), at 10 Paternoster Square, 4th Floor, London, EC4M 7DY, England, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. As of December 31, 2009, FMR U.K. had approximately $11.3 billion in discretionary assets under management. FMR U.K. may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for the fund.</R>
  • <R>Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.), at Floor 19, 41 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. As of December 31, 2009, FMR H.K. had approximately $1.8 billion in discretionary assets under management. FMR H.K. may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for the fund.</R>
  • Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc. (FMR Japan), at Kamiyacho Prime Place, 1-17, Toranomon-4-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. FMR Japan was organized in 2008 to provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States. FMR Japan may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for the fund.
  • <R>FIL Investment Advisors (FIIA), at Pembroke Hall, 42 Crow Lane, Pembroke HM19, Bermuda, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. As of June 30, 2009, FIIA had approximately $12.8 billion in discretionary assets under management. For the fund, FIIA may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and, in particular, will make minimal credit risk and comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S. dollar-denominated securities.</R>

Prospectus

  • <R>FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd. (FIIA(U.K.)L), at Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, TN11 9DZ, United Kingdom, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. As of June 30, 2009, FIIA(U.K.)L had approximately $5.3 billion in discretionary assets under management. For the fund, FIIA(U.K.)L may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and, in particular, will make minimal credit risk and comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S. dollar-denominated securities.</R>

From time to time a manager, analyst, or other Fidelity employee may express views regarding a particular company, security, industry, or market sector. The views expressed by any such person are the views of only that individual as of the time expressed and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.

The fund pays a management fee to FMR. The management fee is calculated and paid to FMR every month. FMR pays all of the other expenses of the fund with limited exceptions.

The fund's annual management fee rate is 0.20% of its average net assets.

FMR pays FIMM, FMR U.K., FMR H.K., and FMR Japan for providing sub-advisory services. FMR and its affiliates pay FRAC for providing sub-advisory services. FIMM pays FIIA for providing sub-advisory services, and FIIA in turn pays FIIA(U.K.)L.

The basis for the Board of Trustees approving the management contract and sub-advisory agreements for the fund is available in the fund's annual report for the fiscal period ended February 28, 2010.

FMR may, from time to time, agree to reimburse a class for management fees above a specified limit. FMR retains the ability to be repaid by a class if expenses fall below the specified limit prior to the end of the fiscal year. Reimbursement arrangements can decrease a class's expenses and boost its performance.

<R> </R>

Fund Distribution

The fund is composed of multiple classes of shares. All classes of the fund have a common investment objective and investment portfolio.

FDC distributes Institutional Class's shares.

Intermediaries, including banks, broker-dealers, and other service-providers (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), may receive from FMR, FDC, and/or their affiliates compensation for their services intended to result in the sale of Institutional Class shares. This compensation may take the form of payments for additional distribution-related activities and/or shareholder services and payments for educational seminars and training, including seminars sponsored by FMR or an affiliate, or by an intermediary. These payments are described in more detail in this section and in the statement of additional information (SAI).

Prospectus

Fund Services - continued

Please speak with your investment professional to learn more about any payments his or her firm may receive from FMR, FDC, and/or their affiliates, as well as fees and/or commissions the investment professional charges. You should also consult disclosures made by your investment professional at the time of purchase.

Institutional Class has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) that recognizes that FMR may use its management fee revenues, as well as its past profits or its resources from any other source, to pay FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of Institutional Class shares and/or shareholder support services. FMR, directly or through FDC, may pay significant amounts to intermediaries, such as banks, broker-dealers, and other service-providers, that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees of the fund has authorized such payments for Institutional Class.

If payments made by FMR to FDC or to intermediaries under the Distribution and Service Plan were considered to be paid out of Institutional Class's assets on an ongoing basis, they might increase the cost of your investment and might cost you more than paying other types of sales charges.

No dealer, sales representative, or any other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations, other than those contained in this prospectus and in the related SAI, in connection with the offer contained in this prospectus. If given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the fund or FDC. This prospectus and the related SAI do not constitute an offer by the fund or by FDC to sell shares of the fund to or to buy shares of the fund from any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer.

Prospectus


Appendix

Financial Highlights

<R>The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand Institutional Class's financial history for the period of the class's operations. Certain information reflects financial results for a single class share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the class (assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions). This information has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, whose report, along with the fund's financial highlights and financial statements, is included in the fund's annual report. A free copy of the annual report is available upon request.</R>

Selected Per-Share Data and Ratios

<R>Years ended February 28,

2010

2009

2008 E</R>

<R>Selected Per-Share Data

 

 

</R>

<R>Net asset value, beginning of period

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00</R>

<R>Income from Investment Operations

 

 

</R>

<R>Net investment income

.002

.016

.029</R>

<R>Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) G

-

-

-</R>

<R>Total from investment operations

.002

.016

.029</R>

<R>Distributions from net investment income

(.002)

(.016)

(.029)</R>

<R>Distributions from net realized gain

-

- G

- G</R>

<R>Total distributions

(.002)

(.016)

(.029)</R>

<R>Net asset value, end of period

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00</R>

<R>Total Return B, C

.19%

1.60%

2.90%</R>

<R>Ratios to Average Net Assets D, F

 

 

</R>

<R>Expenses before reductions

.29%

.27%

.25% A</R>

<R>Expenses net of fee waivers, if any

.24%

.22%

.20% A</R>

<R>Expenses net of all reductions

.24%

.19%

.13% A</R>

<R>Net investment income

.21%

1.65%

3.22% A</R>

<R>Supplemental Data

 

 

</R>

<R>Net assets, end of period (in millions)

$ 1,291

$ 2,076

$ 3,116 </R>

<R>A Annualized</R>

<R>B Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.</R>

<R>C Total returns would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced during the periods shown.</R>

<R>D Fees and expenses of the underlying Fidelity Central Funds are not included in the Fund's expense ratio. The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of any underlying Fidelity Central Funds.</R>

<R>E For the period April 18, 2007 (commencement of sale of shares) to February 29, 2008.</R>

<R>F Expense ratios reflect operating expenses of the class. Expenses before reductions do not reflect amounts reimbursed or waived or reductions from expense offset arrangements and do not represent the amount paid by the class during periods when reimbursements, waivers or reductions occur. Expense ratios before reductions for start-up periods may not be representative of longer-term operating periods. Expenses net of fee waivers reflect expenses after reimbursement and waivers but prior to reductions from expense offset arrangements. Expenses net of all reductions represent the net expenses paid by the class.</R>

<R>G Amount represents less than $.001 per share.</R>

Prospectus

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT

To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.

For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license.

For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN) and may be requested to provide information on persons with authority or control over the account such as name, residential address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity.

You can obtain additional information about the fund. A description of the fund's policies and procedures for disclosing its holdings is available in its SAI and on Fidelity's web sites. The SAI also includes more detailed information about the fund and its investments. The SAI is incorporated herein by reference (legally forms a part of the prospectus). The fund's annual and semi-annual reports also include additional information.

For a free copy of any of these documents or to request other information or ask questions about the fund, call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098. In addition, you may visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com or www.advisor.fidelity.com for a free copy of a prospectus, SAI, or annual or semi-annual report or to request other information.

The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.

Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number, 811-06397

FDC is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). You may obtain information about SIPC, including the SIPC brochure, by visiting www.sipc.org or calling SIPC at 202-371-8300.

Fidelity, Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design, FAST, and Directed Dividends are registered trademarks of FMR LLC.

The third party marks appearing above are the marks of their respective owners.

<R>1.844282.105 CAM-pro-0410</R>

Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

Class/Ticker

Service/FSSXX

Prospectus

April 29, 2010


fid120565


Contents

Fund Summary

<Click Here>

 

Fund Basics

<Click Here>

Investment Details

 

<Click Here>

Valuing Shares

Shareholder Information

<Click Here>

Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares

 

<Click Here>

Exchanging Shares

 

<Click Here>

Account Features and Policies

 

<Click Here>

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

 

<Click Here>

Tax Consequences

Fund Services

<Click Here>

Fund Management

 

<Click Here>

Fund Distribution

Appendix

<Click Here>

Financial Highlights

Prospectus


Fund Summary

Fund/Class:
Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund/Service

Investment Objective

The fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

Fee Table

The following table describes the fees and expenses that may be incurred when you buy and hold shares of the fund.

Shareholder fees (fees paid directly from your investment)

None

Annual class operating expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a % of the value of your investment)

<R>Management fee

0.20%</R>

<R>Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) fees

0.25%</R>

<R>Other expenses

0.09%</R>

<R>Total annual operating expenses

0.54%</R>

<R>Expense reimbursement

0.05%</R>

<R>Total annual operating expenses after expense reimbursementA

0.49%</R>

<R>A Effective April 17, 2007, Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) has contractually agreed to reimburse Service Class of the fund to the extent that total operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, extraordinary expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses, if any), as a percentage of its average net assets, exceed 0.45%. FMR may not discontinue or modify this arrangement without the approval of the Board of Trustees. This arrangement will remain in effect for at least one year from the effective date of the prospectus, and will remain in effect thereafter unless discontinued with the approval of the Board of Trustees.</R>

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

This example helps compare the cost of investing in the fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.

Let's say, hypothetically, that the annual return for shares of the fund is 5% and that your shareholder fees and the annual operating expenses for shares of the fund are exactly as described in the fee table. This example illustrates the effect of fees and expenses, but is not meant to suggest actual or expected fees and expenses or returns, all of which may vary. For every $10,000 you invested, here's how much you would pay in total expenses if you sell all of your shares at the end of each time period indicated:

<R>1 year

$ 50</R>

<R>3 years

$ 157</R>

<R>5 years

$ 274</R>

<R>10 years

$ 616</R>

Principal Investment Strategies

  • Normally investing in municipal money market securities.
  • Normally investing at least 80% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes.
  • Potentially investing up to 20% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to California personal income tax.
  • Normally not investing in municipal securities whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.
  • Potentially investing more than 25% of total assets in municipal securities that finance similar types of projects.
  • Investing in compliance with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds for the quality, maturity, and diversification of investments.

Principal Investment Risks

  • Municipal Market Volatility. The municipal market is volatile and can be significantly affected by adverse tax, legislative, or political changes and the financial condition of the issuers of municipal securities.
  • Interest Rate Changes. Interest rate increases can cause the price of a money market security to decrease.
  • Foreign Exposure. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure that are located in foreign countries can be affected by adverse political, regulatory, market, or economic developments in those countries.
  • Geographic Concentration. Unfavorable political or economic conditions within California can affect the credit quality of issuers located in that state.
  • Issuer-Specific Changes. A decline in the credit quality of an issuer or a provider of credit support or a maturity-shortening structure for a security can cause the price of a money market security to decrease.

Prospectus

An investment in the fund is not a deposit of a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.

Performance

The following information is intended to help you understand the risks of investing in the fund. The information illustrates the changes in the performance of the fund's shares from year to year. Past performance is not necessarily an indication of future performance.

Visit www.advisor.fidelity.com for updated return information.

Year-by-Year Returns

<R>Calendar Years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

2009</R>

<R>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.70%

0.07%</R>

<R>fid120628</R>

<R>During the periods shown in the chart:

Returns

Quarter ended</R>

<R>Highest Quarter Return

0.56%

March 31, 2008</R>

<R>Lowest Quarter Return

0.00%

September 30, 2009</R>

<R>Year-to-Date Return

0.00%

March 31, 2010</R>

Average Annual Returns

<R>For the periods ended
December 31, 2009

Past 1
year

Life of
class
A</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

 

</R>

  <R>Service Class

0.07%

1.50%</R>

<R>A From April 18, 2007.</R>

Investment Advisers

Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) is the fund's manager. Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) and other affiliates of FMR serve as sub-advisers for the fund.

Prospectus

Fund Summary - continued

Purchase and Sale of Shares

You may buy or sell Service Class shares of the fund through a Fidelity brokerage or mutual fund account, or through an investment professional. You may buy or sell shares in various ways:

Internet

www.advisor.fidelity.com

Phone

Fidelity Automated Service Telephone (FAST®) 1-800-544-5555

To reach a Fidelity representative 1-800-544-6666

Mail

Additional purchases:

Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0003

Redemptions:

Fidelity Investments
P.O. Box 770001
Cincinnati, OH 45277-0035

TDD - Service for the Deaf and Hearing Impaired

1-800-544-0118

The price to buy one share of Service Class is its net asset value per share (NAV). Your shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form.

The price to sell one share of Service Class is its NAV. Your shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form.

The fund is open for business each day the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is open. Even if the NYSE is closed, the fund will be open for business on those days on which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (New York Fed) is open, the primary trading markets for the fund's portfolio instruments are open, and the fund's management believes there is an adequate market to meet purchase and redemption requests.

The fund has a minimum initial investment of $1,000,000.

Tax Information

The fund seeks to earn income and pay dividends exempt from federal income tax and California personal income tax. A portion of the dividends you receive may be subject to federal, state, or local income tax. You may also receive taxable distributions attributable to the fund's sale of municipal bonds.

Payments to Broker-Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries

<R>The fund, FMR, Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC), and/or their affiliates may pay intermediaries, including a bank, broker-dealer, or other service-provider (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), for the sale of fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing your intermediary and your investment professional to recommend the fund over another investment. Ask your investment professional or visit your intermediary's web site for more information.</R>

Prospectus


Fund Basics

Investment Details

Investment Objective

The fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital.

Principal Investment Strategies

FMR normally invests the fund's assets in municipal money market securities.

FMR normally invests at least 80% of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes. Municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal and California personal income taxes include securities issued by U.S. territories and possessions, such as Guam, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico, and their political subdivisions and public corporations.

FMR may invest up to 20% of the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to California personal income tax under normal circumstances. FMR does not currently intend to invest the fund's assets in municipal securities whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

The supply of and demand for municipal money market securities can vary from time to time. When FMR believes that suitable municipal money market securities are not available, or during other unusual market conditions, FMR may leave a significant portion of the fund's assets uninvested, or may invest up to 20% of the fund's assets in securities subject to state and/or federal income tax.

FMR may invest more than 25% of the fund's total assets in municipal securities that finance similar projects, such as those relating to education, health care, housing, transportation, and utilities.

In buying and selling securities for the fund, FMR complies with industry-standard regulatory requirements for money market funds regarding the quality, maturity, and diversification of the fund's investments. FMR may invest the fund's assets in municipal money market securities by investing in other funds. FMR stresses maintaining a stable $1.00 share price, liquidity, and income.

Description of Principal Security Types

Money market securities are high-quality, short-term securities that pay a fixed, variable, or floating interest rate. Securities are often specifically structured so that they are eligible investments for a money market fund. For example, in order to satisfy the maturity restrictions for a money market fund, some money market securities have demand or put features, which have the effect of shortening the security's maturity. Municipal money market securities include variable rate demand notes, commercial paper, and municipal notes.

Municipal securities are issued to raise money for a variety of public and private purposes, including general financing for state and local governments, or financing for a specific project or public facility. Municipal securities may be fully or partially backed by the local government, by the credit of a private issuer, by the current or anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets, or by domestic or foreign entities providing credit support such as letters of credit, guarantees, or insurance.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Principal Investment Risks

Many factors affect the fund's performance. Because FMR concentrates the fund's investments in California, the fund's performance is expected to be closely tied to economic and political conditions within that state and to be more volatile than the performance of a more geographically diversified fund.

The fund's yield will change daily based on changes in interest rates and other market conditions. Although the fund is managed to maintain a stable $1.00 share price, there is no guarantee that the fund will be able to do so. For example, a major increase in interest rates or a decrease in the credit quality of the issuer of one of the fund's investments could cause the fund's share price to decrease.

The following factors can significantly affect the fund's performance:

Municipal Market Volatility. Municipal securities can be significantly affected by political changes as well as uncertainties in the municipal market related to taxation, legislative changes, or the rights of municipal security holders. Because many municipal securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care, transportation, and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect the overall municipal market. In addition, changes in the financial condition of an individual municipal insurer can affect the overall municipal market, and market conditions may directly impact the liquidity and valuation of municipal securities.

Interest Rate Changes. Money market securities have varying levels of sensitivity to changes in interest rates. In general, the price of a money market security can fall when interest rates rise and can rise when interest rates fall. Securities with longer maturities can be more sensitive to interest rate changes. Short-term securities tend to react to changes in short-term interest rates.

Foreign Exposure. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure that are located in foreign countries can involve increased risks. Extensive public information about the provider may not be available and unfavorable political, economic, or governmental developments could affect the value of the security.

<R>Geographic Concentration. California is continuing to experience financial difficulties due to the ongoing economic crisis. The deterioration of California's fiscal situation increases the risk of investing in California municipal securities, including the risk of greater volatility and potential issuer default. Several rating agencies have recently downgraded California's general obligation bond rating. Further downgrades could result in a reduction in the market value of California municipal securities.</R>

Issuer-Specific Changes. Changes in the financial condition of an issuer or counterparty, changes in specific economic or political conditions that affect a particular type of issuer, and changes in general economic or political conditions can increase the risk of default by an issuer or counterparty, which can affect a security's or instrument's credit quality or value. Entities providing credit support or a maturity-shortening structure also can be affected by these types of changes. Municipal securities backed by current or anticipated revenues from a specific project or specific assets can be negatively affected by the discontinuance of the taxation supporting the project or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. If the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determines an issuer of a municipal security has not complied with applicable tax requirements, interest from the security could become taxable and the security could decline significantly in value. In addition, if the structure of a security fails to function as intended, interest from the security could become taxable or the security could decline in value.

Prospectus

Generally, the fund purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the opinion of bond counsel, is free from federal income tax and from the federal alternative minimum tax. Neither FMR nor the fund guarantees that this opinion is correct, and there is no assurance that the IRS will agree with bond counsel's opinion. Issuers or other parties generally enter into covenants requiring continuing compliance with federal tax requirements to preserve the tax-free status of interest payments over the life of the security. If at any time the covenants are not complied with, or if the IRS otherwise determines that the issuer did not comply with relevant tax requirements, interest payments from a security could become federally taxable, possibly retroactively to the date the security was issued. For certain types of structured securities, the tax status of the pass-through of tax-free income may also be based on the federal and state tax treatment of the structure.

In response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, FMR may temporarily use a different investment strategy (including leaving a significant portion of a fund's assets uninvested) for defensive purposes. Uninvested assets do not earn income for a fund, which may have a significant negative impact on the fund's yield and may prevent the fund from achieving its investment objective. In addition, different factors could affect the fund's performance, and the fund could distribute income subject to federal or California personal income tax.

Fundamental Investment Policies

The following policies are fundamental, that is, subject to change only by shareholder approval:

The fund seeks as high a level of current income, exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income tax, as is consistent with the preservation of capital. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from federal income tax. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal securities whose interest is exempt from California personal income tax.

Prospectus

Fund Basics - continued

Valuing Shares

The fund is open for business each day the NYSE is open. Even if the NYSE is closed, the fund will be open for business on those days on which the New York Fed is open, the primary trading markets for the fund's portfolio instruments are open, and the fund's management believes there is an adequate market to meet purchase and redemption requests.

A class's NAV is the value of a single share. Fidelity normally calculates the class's NAV as of the close of business of the NYSE, normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. The fund's assets normally are valued as of this time for the purpose of computing the class's NAV.

NAV is not calculated and the fund will not process purchase and redemption requests submitted on days when the fund is not open for business. The time at which shares are priced and until which purchase and redemption orders are accepted may be changed as permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

To the extent that the fund's assets are traded in other markets on days when the fund is not open for business, the value of the fund's assets may be affected on those days. In addition, trading in some of the fund's assets may not occur on days when the fund is open for business.

The fund's assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost.

Prospectus


Shareholder Information

Additional Information about the Purchase and Sale of Shares

General Information

Fidelity Investments was established in 1946 to manage one of America's first mutual funds. Today, Fidelity is the largest mutual fund company in the country, and is known as an innovative provider of high-quality financial services to individuals and institutions.

In addition to its mutual fund business, the company operates one of America's leading brokerage firms, Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC. Fidelity is also a leader in providing tax-advantaged retirement plans for individuals investing on their own or through their employer.

You may buy or sell shares of a fund through a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account. If you buy or sell shares of a fund (other than by exchange) through a Fidelity brokerage account, your transactions generally involve your Fidelity brokerage core (a settlement vehicle included as part of your Fidelity brokerage account).

If you do not currently have a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account and would like to invest in a fund, you may need to complete an application. For more information about a Fidelity brokerage account or a Fidelity mutual fund account, please visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com, call 1-800-FIDELITY, or visit a Fidelity Investor Center (call 1-800-544-9797 for the center nearest you).

You may also buy or sell shares of Service Class through an investment professional. If you buy or sell shares of Service Class through an investment professional, the procedures for buying, selling, and exchanging shares of Service Class and the account features and policies may differ from those discussed in this prospectus. Fees in addition to those discussed in this prospectus may also apply. For example, you may be charged a transaction fee if you buy or sell shares of Service Class through a non-Fidelity broker or other investment professional.

You should include the following information with any order to buy, sell, or exchange shares:

  • Your name;
  • Your account number;
  • Name of fund whose shares you want to buy or sell; and
  • Dollar amount or number of shares you want to buy or sell.

Certain methods of contacting Fidelity, such as by telephone or electronically, may be unavailable or delayed (for example, during periods of unusual market activity). In addition, the level and type of service available may be restricted based on criteria established by Fidelity.

The fund may reject for any reason, or cancel as permitted or required by law, any purchase or exchange, including transactions deemed to represent excessive trading, at any time.

Excessive trading of fund shares can harm shareholders in various ways, including reducing the returns to long-term shareholders by increasing costs to the fund (such as spreads paid to dealers who sell money market instruments to a fund) and disrupting portfolio management strategies.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

FMR anticipates that shareholders will purchase and sell shares of the fund frequently because a money market fund is designed to offer investors a liquid cash option. Accordingly, the Board of Trustees has not adopted policies and procedures designed to discourage excessive trading of money market fund shares and the fund accommodates frequent trading.

The fund may in its discretion restrict, reject, or cancel any purchases or exchanges that, in FMR's opinion, may be disruptive to the management of the fund or otherwise not be in the fund's interests.

The fund has no limit on purchase or exchange transactions. The fund reserves the right at any time to restrict purchases or exchanges or impose conditions that are more restrictive on excessive or disruptive trading than those stated in this prospectus.

Buying Shares

The price to buy one share of Service Class is its NAV. Service Class shares are sold without a sales charge.

Your shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form.

The fund has authorized certain intermediaries to accept orders to buy shares on its behalf. When authorized intermediaries receive an order in proper form, the order is considered as being placed with the fund, and shares will be bought at the NAV next calculated after the order is received by the authorized intermediary. Orders by funds of funds for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment manager will be treated as received by the fund at the same time that the corresponding orders are received in proper form by the funds of funds.

The fund may stop offering shares completely or may offer shares only on a limited basis, for a period of time or permanently.

If your payment is not received and collected, your purchase may be canceled and you could be liable for any losses or fees the fund or Fidelity has incurred.

If when you place your wire purchase order you indicate that Fidelity will receive your wire that day, your wire must be received in proper form by Fidelity at the applicable fund's designated wire bank before the close of the Federal Reserve Wire System on the day of purchase.

Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, purchase orders may be suspended, restricted, or canceled and the monies may be withheld.

Selling Shares

The price to sell one share of Service Class is its NAV.

Your shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after your order is received in proper form. Normally, redemptions will be processed by the next business day, but it may take up to seven days to pay the redemption proceeds if making immediate payment would adversely affect the fund.

Prospectus

The fund has authorized certain intermediaries to accept orders to sell shares on its behalf. When authorized intermediaries receive an order in proper form, the order is considered as being placed with the fund, and shares will be sold at the NAV next calculated after the order is received by the authorized intermediary. Orders by funds of funds for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment manager will be treated as received by the fund at the same time that the corresponding orders are received in proper form by the funds of funds.

A signature guarantee is designed to protect you and Fidelity from fraud. If you submit your request to Fidelity by mail, Fidelity may require that your request be made in writing and include a signature guarantee in certain circumstances, such as:

  • When the address on your account (record address) has changed within the last 15 days or you are requesting that a check be mailed to an address different than the record address;
  • When you are requesting that redemption proceeds be paid to someone other than the account owner; or
  • In certain situations when the redemption proceeds are being transferred to a Fidelity account with a different registration.

You should be able to obtain a signature guarantee from a bank, broker (including Fidelity Investor Centers), dealer, credit union (if authorized under state law), securities exchange or association, clearing agency, or savings association. A notary public cannot provide a signature guarantee.

When you place an order to sell shares, note the following:

  • If you are selling some but not all of your shares, keep your fund balance above the required minimum to keep your fund position open, except fund positions not subject to balance minimums.
  • You are advised to place your trades as early in the day as possible and to provide Fidelity with advance notice of large redemptions.
  • Redemption proceeds (other than exchanges) may be delayed until money from prior purchases sufficient to cover your redemption has been received and collected. This can take up to seven business days after a purchase.
  • Redemptions may be suspended or payment dates postponed when the NYSE is closed (other than weekends or holidays), when trading on the NYSE is restricted, or as permitted by the SEC.
  • Redemption proceeds may be paid in securities or other property rather than in cash if FMR determines it is in the best interests of the fund.
  • If you sell shares by writing a check, if available, and the amount of the check is greater than the value of your fund position, your check will be returned to you and you may be subject to additional charges.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

  • You will not receive interest on amounts represented by uncashed redemption checks.
  • If you hold your shares in a Fidelity mutual fund account and your redemption check remains uncashed for more than one year, the check may be invested in additional shares of the fund at the NAV next calculated on the day of the investment.
  • Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, redemption requests may be suspended, restricted, canceled, or processed and the proceeds may be withheld.

Exchanging Shares

An exchange involves the redemption of all or a portion of the shares of one fund and the purchase of shares of another fund.

As a Service Class shareholder, you have the privilege of exchanging Service Class shares of a fund for any class of a Fidelity money market fund or for shares of other Fidelity funds.

However, you should note the following policies and restrictions governing exchanges:

  • The fund may refuse any exchange purchase for any reason. For example, the fund may refuse exchange purchases by any person or group if, in FMR's judgment, the fund would be unable to invest the money effectively in accordance with its investment objective and policies, or would otherwise potentially be adversely affected.
  • Before exchanging into a fund or class, read its prospectus.
  • The fund or class you are exchanging into must be available for sale in your state.
  • Exchanges may have tax consequences for you.
  • If you are exchanging between accounts that are not registered in the same name, address, and taxpayer identification number (TIN), there may be additional requirements.
  • Under applicable anti-money laundering regulations and other federal regulations, exchange requests may be suspended, restricted, canceled, or processed and the proceeds may be withheld.

The fund may terminate or modify exchange privileges in the future.

Other funds may have different exchange restrictions and minimums, and may impose redemption fees of up to 2.00% of the amount exchanged. Check each fund's prospectus for details.

Account Features and Policies

Features

The following features may be available to buy and sell shares of the fund. Visit www.advisor.fidelity.com or contact your investment professional for more information.

Prospectus

Electronic Funds Transfer: electronic money movement through the Automated Clearing House

  • To transfer money between a bank account and a Fidelity brokerage account or Fidelity mutual fund account.
  • You can use electronic funds transfer to:
- Make periodic (automatic) purchases of Fidelity fund shares or payments to your Fidelity brokerage account.
- Make periodic (automatic) redemptions of Fidelity fund shares or withdrawals from your Fidelity brokerage account.

Wire: electronic money movement through the Federal Reserve wire system

  • To transfer money between a bank account and your fund account.

Automatic Transactions: periodic (automatic) transactions

  • To directly deposit all or a portion of your compensation from your employer (or the U.S. Government, in the case of Social Security) into a Fidelity brokerage account or Fidelity mutual fund account.
  • To sell shares of a Fidelity money market fund and simultaneously to buy shares of another Fidelity fund in a Fidelity mutual fund account.

Checkwriting

  • To sell Fidelity fund shares from your Fidelity mutual fund account or withdraw money from your Fidelity brokerage account.

Policies

The following policies apply to you as a shareholder.

Statements that Fidelity sends to you include the following:

  • Confirmation statements (after transactions affecting your fund balance except reinvestment of distributions in the fund).
  • Monthly or quarterly account statements (detailing fund balances and all transactions completed during the prior month or quarter).

To reduce expenses, only one copy of most financial reports and prospectuses may be mailed, even if more than one person in a household holds shares of the fund. Call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098 if you need additional copies of financial reports or prospectuses. If you do not want the mailing of these documents to be combined with those for other members of your household, call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098.

Electronic copies of most financial reports and prospectuses are available at Fidelity's web site. To participate in Fidelity's electronic delivery program, call Fidelity or visit Fidelity's web site for more information.

You may initiate many transactions by telephone or electronically. Fidelity will not be responsible for any loss, cost, expense, or other liability resulting from unauthorized transactions if it follows reasonable security procedures designed to verify the identity of the investor. Fidelity will request personalized security codes or other information, and may also record calls. For transactions conducted through the Internet, Fidelity recommends the use of an Internet browser with 128-bit encryption. You should verify the accuracy of your confirmation statements upon receipt and notify Fidelity immediately of any discrepancies in your account activity. If you do not want the ability to sell and exchange by telephone, call Fidelity for instructions. Additional documentation may be required from corporations, associations, and certain fiduciaries.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

When you sign your account application, you will be asked to certify that your social security or taxpayer identification number (TIN) is correct and that you are not subject to backup withholding for failing to report income to the IRS. If you violate IRS regulations, the IRS can require the fund to withhold an amount subject to the applicable backup withholding rate from your taxable distributions and redemptions.

You may also be asked to provide additional information in order for Fidelity to verify your identity in accordance with requirements under anti-money laundering regulations. Accounts may be restricted and/or closed, and the monies withheld, pending verification of this information or as otherwise required under these and other federal regulations.

If your fund balance falls below $1,000,000 worth of shares for any reason and you do not increase your balance, Fidelity may sell all of your shares and send the proceeds to you after providing you with at least 30 days' notice to reestablish the minimum balance. Your shares will be sold at the NAV on the day Fidelity closes your fund position. Certain fund positions are not subject to these balance requirements and will not be closed for failure to maintain a minimum balance.

Fidelity may charge a fee for certain services, such as providing historical account documents.

Dividends and Capital Gain Distributions

The fund earns interest, dividends, and other income from its investments, and distributes this income (less expenses) to shareholders as dividends. The fund may also realize capital gains from its investments, and distributes these gains (less losses), if any, to shareholders as capital gain distributions.

Distributions you receive from the fund consist primarily of dividends. The fund normally declares dividends daily and pays them monthly.

You may request to have dividends relating to Service Class shares redeemed from an account closed during the month paid when the account is closed. The fund reserves the right to limit this service.

Prospectus

Earning Dividends

Service Class shares purchased by a wire order prior to 12:00 noon Eastern time, with receipt of the wire in proper form before the close of the Federal Reserve Wire System on that day, generally begin to earn dividends on the day of purchase.

Service Class shares purchased by all other orders generally begin to earn dividends on the first business day following the day of purchase.

Service Class shares redeemed by a wire order prior to 12:00 noon Eastern time, generally earn dividends through the day prior to the day of redemption.

Service Class shares redeemed by all other orders generally earn dividends until, but not including, the next business day following the day of redemption.

Exchange requests will be processed only when both funds are open for business.

Distribution Options

When you open an account, specify on your application how you want to receive your distributions. The following distribution options are available for Service Class:

1. Reinvestment Option. Your dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, will be automatically reinvested in additional Service Class shares of the fund. If you do not indicate a choice on your application, you will be assigned this option.

2. Cash Option. Your dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, will be paid in cash.

3. Directed Dividends® Option. Your dividends will be automatically invested in shares of another identically registered Fidelity fund. Your capital gain distributions, if any, will be automatically invested in shares of another identically registered Fidelity fund, automatically reinvested in additional Service Class shares, or paid in cash.

Not all distribution options are available for every account. If the option you prefer is not listed on your account application, or if you want to change your current option, contact your investment professional directly or call Fidelity.

If you elect to receive distributions paid in cash by check and the U.S. Postal Service does not deliver your checks, your distribution option may be converted to the Reinvestment Option. You will not receive interest on amounts represented by uncashed distribution checks.

Tax Consequences

As with any investment, your investment in the fund could have tax consequences for you.

The fund seeks to earn income and pay dividends exempt from federal income tax and California personal income tax.

A portion of the dividends you receive may be subject to federal, state, or local income tax. You may also receive taxable distributions attributable to the fund's sale of municipal bonds.

For federal tax purposes, certain of the fund's distributions, including distributions of short-term capital gains and gains on the sale of bonds characterized as market discount, are taxable to you as ordinary income, while the fund's distributions of long-term capital gains, if any, are taxable to you generally as capital gains.

Prospectus

Shareholder Information - continued

For California personal income tax purposes, distributions derived from interest on municipal securities of California issuers and from interest on qualifying securities issued by U.S. territories and possessions are generally exempt from tax. Distributions that are federally taxable as ordinary income or capital gains are generally subject to California personal income tax.

Any taxable distributions you receive from the fund will normally be taxable to you when you receive them, regardless of your distribution option. If you elect to receive distributions in cash or to invest distributions automatically in shares of another Fidelity fund, you will receive certain December distributions in January, but those distributions will be taxable as if you received them on December 31.

Prospectus


Fund Services

Fund Management

The fund is a mutual fund, an investment that pools shareholders' money and invests it toward a specified goal.

FMR is the fund's manager. The address of FMR and its affiliates, unless otherwise indicated below, is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

<R>As of December 31, 2009, FMR had approximately $1.3 billion in discretionary assets under management.</R>

As the manager, FMR has overall responsibility for directing the fund's investments and handling its business affairs.

FIMM serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. FIMM has day-to-day responsibility for choosing investments for the fund.

<R>FIMM is an affiliate of FMR. As of December 31, 2009, FIMM had approximately $639.1 billion in discretionary assets under management.</R>

Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC), an affiliate of FMR, was organized in 1986. FRAC serves as a sub-adviser for the fund and may provide investment research and advice for the fund.

Affiliates assist FMR with foreign investments:

  • <R>Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (FMR U.K.), at 10 Paternoster Square, 4th Floor, London, EC4M 7DY, England, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. As of December 31, 2009, FMR U.K. had approximately $11.3 billion in discretionary assets under management. FMR U.K. may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for the fund.</R>
  • <R>Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.), at Floor 19, 41 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. As of December 31, 2009, FMR H.K. had approximately $1.8 billion in discretionary assets under management. FMR H.K. may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for the fund.</R>
  • Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc. (FMR Japan), at Kamiyacho Prime Place, 1-17, Toranomon-4-Chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. FMR Japan was organized in 2008 to provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States. FMR Japan may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and may also provide investment advisory services for the fund.
  • <R>FIL Investment Advisors (FIIA), at Pembroke Hall, 42 Crow Lane, Pembroke HM19, Bermuda, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. As of June 30, 2009, FIIA had approximately $12.8 billion in discretionary assets under management. For the fund, FIIA may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and, in particular, will make minimal credit risk and comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S. dollar-denominated securities.</R>

Prospectus

  • <R>FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd. (FIIA(U.K.)L), at Oakhill House, 130 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, TN11 9DZ, United Kingdom, serves as a sub-adviser for the fund. As of June 30, 2009, FIIA(U.K.)L had approximately $5.3 billion in discretionary assets under management. For the fund, FIIA(U.K.)L may provide investment research and advice on issuers based outside the United States and, in particular, will make minimal credit risk and comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S. dollar-denominated securities.</R>

From time to time a manager, analyst, or other Fidelity employee may express views regarding a particular company, security, industry, or market sector. The views expressed by any such person are the views of only that individual as of the time expressed and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.

The fund pays a management fee to FMR. The management fee is calculated and paid to FMR every month. FMR pays all of the other expenses of the fund with limited exceptions.

The fund's annual management fee rate is 0.20% of its average net assets.

FMR pays FIMM, FMR U.K., FMR H.K., and FMR Japan for providing sub-advisory services. FMR and its affiliates pay FRAC for providing sub-advisory services. FIMM pays FIIA for providing sub-advisory services, and FIIA in turn pays FIIA(U.K.)L.

The basis for the Board of Trustees approving the management contract and sub-advisory agreements for the fund is available in the fund's annual report for the fiscal period ended February 28, 2010.

FMR may, from time to time, agree to reimburse a class for management fees above a specified limit. FMR retains the ability to be repaid by a class if expenses fall below the specified limit prior to the end of the fiscal year. Reimbursement arrangements can decrease a class's expenses and boost its performance.

<R> </R>

Fund Distribution

The fund is composed of multiple classes of shares. All classes of the fund have a common investment objective and investment portfolio.

FDC distributes Service Class's shares.

Intermediaries, including banks, broker-dealers, and other service-providers (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), may receive from FMR, FDC, and/or their affiliates compensation for their services intended to result in the sale of class shares. This compensation may take the form of:

Prospectus

Fund Services - continued

  • distribution and/or service (12b-1) fees
  • payments for additional distribution-related activities and/or shareholder services
  • payments for educational seminars and training, including seminars sponsored by FMR or an affiliate, or by an intermediary

These payments are described in more detail in this section and in the statement of additional information (SAI).

Service Class has adopted a Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act). Under the plan, Service Class is authorized to pay FDC a monthly 12b-1 (service) fee as compensation for providing shareholder support services. Service Class currently pays FDC a monthly 12b-1 (service) fee at an annual rate of 0.25% of its average net assets throughout the month.

Any fees paid out of Service Class's assets on an ongoing basis pursuant to the Distribution and Service Plan will increase the cost of your investment and may cost you more than paying other types of sales charges.

In addition, the Service Class plan specifically recognizes that FMR may make payments from its management fee revenue, past profits, or other resources to FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of Service Class shares and/or shareholder support services, including payments of significant amounts made to intermediaries that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees of the fund has authorized such payments for Service Class. Please speak with your investment professional to learn more about any payments his or her firm may receive from FMR, FDC, and/or their affiliates, as well as fees and/or commissions the investment professional charges. You should also consult disclosures made by your investment professional at the time of purchase.

No dealer, sales representative, or any other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations, other than those contained in this prospectus and in the related SAI, in connection with the offer contained in this prospectus. If given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the fund or FDC. This prospectus and the related SAI do not constitute an offer by the fund or by FDC to sell shares of the fund to or to buy shares of the fund from any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer.

Prospectus


Appendix

Financial Highlights

<R>The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand Service Class's financial history for the period of the class's operations. Certain information reflects financial results for a single class share. The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the class (assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions). This information has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, whose report, along with the fund's financial highlights and financial statements, is included in the fund's annual report. A free copy of the annual report is available upon request.</R>

Selected Per-Share Data and Ratios

<R>Years ended February 28,

2010

2009

2008 E</R>

<R>Selected Per-Share Data

 

 

</R>

<R>Net asset value, beginning of period

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00</R>

<R>Income from Investment Operations

 

 

</R>

<R>Net investment income

- G

.013

.026</R>

<R>Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) G

-

-

-</R>

<R>Total from investment operations

- G

.013

.026</R>

<R>Distributions from net investment income

- G

(.013)

(.026)</R>

<R>Distributions from net realized gain

-

- G

- G</R>

<R>Total distributions

- G

(.013)

(.026)</R>

<R>Net asset value, end of period

$ 1.00

$ 1.00

$ 1.00</R>

<R>Total Return B, C

.05%

1.35%

2.67%</R>

<R>Ratios to Average Net Assets D, F

 

 

</R>

<R>Expenses before reductions

.54%

.52%

.50% A</R>

<R>Expenses net of fee waivers, if any

.43%

.47%

.45% A</R>

<R>Expenses net of all reductions

.43%

.44%

.38% A</R>

<R>Net investment income

.02%

1.40%

2.84% A</R>

<R>Supplemental Data

 

 

</R>

<R>Net assets, end of period (in millions)

$ 1

$ 9

$ 16 </R>

<R>A Annualized</R>

<R>B Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.</R>

<R>C Total returns would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced during the periods shown.</R>

<R>D Fees and expenses of the underlying Fidelity Central Funds are not included in the Fund's expense ratio. The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of any underlying Fidelity Central Funds.</R>

<R>E For the period April 18, 2007 (commencement of sale of shares) to February 29, 2008.</R>

<R>F Expense ratios reflect operating expenses of the class. Expenses before reductions do not reflect amounts reimbursed or waived or reductions from expense offset arrangements and do not represent the amount paid by the class during periods when reimbursements, waivers or reductions occur. Expense ratios before reductions for start-up periods may not be representative of longer-term operating periods. Expenses net of fee waivers reflect expenses after reimbursement and waivers but prior to reductions from expense offset arrangements. Expenses net of all reductions represent the net expenses paid by the class.</R>

<R>G Amount represents less than $.001 per share.</R>

Prospectus

Notes

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT

To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT), requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify, and record information that identifies each person or entity that opens an account.

For individual investors opening an account: When you open an account, you will be asked for your name, address, date of birth, and other information that will allow Fidelity to identify you. You may also be asked to provide documents that may help to establish your identity, such as your driver's license.

For investors other than individuals: When you open an account, you will be asked for the name of the entity, its principal place of business and taxpayer identification number (TIN) and may be requested to provide information on persons with authority or control over the account such as name, residential address, date of birth and social security number. You may also be asked to provide documents, such as drivers' licenses, articles of incorporation, trust instruments or partnership agreements and other information that will help Fidelity identify the entity.

You can obtain additional information about the fund. A description of the fund's policies and procedures for disclosing its holdings is available in its SAI and on Fidelity's web sites. The SAI also includes more detailed information about the fund and its investments. The SAI is incorporated herein by reference (legally forms a part of the prospectus). The fund's annual and semi-annual reports also include additional information.

For a free copy of any of these documents or to request other information or ask questions about the fund, call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098. In addition, you may visit Fidelity's web site at www.advisor.fidelity.com for a free copy of a prospectus, SAI, or annual or semi-annual report or to request other information.

The SAI, the fund's annual and semi-annual reports and other related materials are available from the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) Database on the SEC's web site (http://www.sec.gov). You can obtain copies of this information, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a request by e-mail to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section of the SEC, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520. You can also review and copy information about the fund, including the fund's SAI, at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call 1-202-551-8090 for information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room.

Investment Company Act of 1940, File Number, 811-06397

FDC is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). You may obtain information about SIPC, including the SIPC brochure, by visiting www.sipc.org or calling SIPC at 202-371-8300.

Fidelity, Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design, FAST, and Directed Dividends are registered trademarks of FMR LLC.

The third party marks appearing above are the marks of their respective owners.

<R>1.844289.105 CAMS-pro-0410</R>

Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund

Institutional Class (FSBXX) and Service Class (FSSXX)

A Fund of Fidelity California Municipal Trust II

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

April 29, 2010

This statement of additional information (SAI) is not a prospectus. Portions of the fund's annual report are incorporated herein. The annual report is supplied with this SAI.

To obtain a free additional copy of a prospectus or SAI, dated April 29, 2010, or an annual report, please call Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098 or visit Fidelity's web site at www.fidelity.com or www.advisor.fidelity.com.

(fidelity_logo_graphic)
82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109

<R>CAM/CAMS-ptb-0410
1.844296.104</R>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PAGE

Investment Policies and Limitations

<Click Here>

Special Considerations Regarding California

<Click Here>

Special Considerations Regarding Puerto Rico

<Click Here>

Portfolio Transactions

<Click Here>

Valuation

<Click Here>

Buying, Selling, and Exchanging Information

<Click Here>

Distributions and Taxes

<Click Here>

Trustees and Officers

<Click Here>

Control of Investment Advisers

<Click Here>

Management Contract

<Click Here>

Proxy Voting Guidelines

<Click Here>

Distribution Services

<Click Here>

Transfer and Service Agent Agreements

<Click Here>

Description of the Trust

<Click Here>

Financial Statements

<Click Here>

Fund Holdings Information

<Click Here>

Appendix

<Click Here>

INVESTMENT POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS

The following policies and limitations supplement those set forth in the prospectus. Unless otherwise noted, whenever an investment policy or limitation states a maximum percentage of Fidelity® California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund (the fund)'s assets that may be invested in any security or other asset, or sets forth a policy regarding quality standards, such standard or percentage limitation will be determined immediately after and as a result of the fund's acquisition of such security or other asset. Accordingly, any subsequent change in values, net assets, or other circumstances will not be considered when determining whether the investment complies with the fund's investment policies and limitations.

The fund's fundamental investment policies and limitations cannot be changed without approval by a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act)) of the fund. However, except for the fundamental investment limitations listed below, the investment policies and limitations described in this SAI are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

The following are the fund's fundamental investment limitations set forth in their entirety.

Diversification

The fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer, if, as a result, the fund would not comply with any applicable diversification requirements for a money market fund under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules thereunder, as such may be amended from time to time.

Senior Securities

The fund may not issue senior securities, except in connection with the insurance program established by the fund pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission or as otherwise permitted under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Borrowing

The fund may not borrow money, except that the fund may borrow money for temporary or emergency purposes (not for leveraging or investment) in an amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings). Any borrowings that come to exceed this amount will be reduced within three days (not including Sundays and holidays) to the extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation.

Underwriting

The fund may not underwrite securities issued by others, except to the extent that the fund may be considered an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in the disposition of restricted securities or in connection with investments in other investment companies.

Concentration

The fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or tax-exempt obligations issued or guaranteed by a U.S. territory or possession or a state or local government, or a political subdivision of any of the foregoing) if, as a result, more than 25% of the fund's total assets would be invested in securities of companies whose principal business activities are in the same industry.

For purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) identifies the issuer of a security depending on its terms and conditions. In identifying the issuer, FMR will consider the entity or entities responsible for payment of interest and repayment of principal and the source of such payments; the way in which assets and revenues of an issuing political subdivision are separated from those of other political entities; and whether a governmental body is guaranteeing the security.

For purposes of the fund's concentration limitation discussed above, FMR may analyze the characteristics of a particular issuer and security and assign an industry or sector classification consistent with those characteristics in the event that the third party classification provider used by FMR does not assign a classification.

Real Estate

The fund may not purchase or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments (but this shall not prevent the fund from investing in securities or other instruments backed by real estate or securities of companies engaged in the real estate business).

Commodities

The fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities.

Loans

The fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets would be lent to other parties, but this limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities or to repurchase agreements, or to acquisitions of loans, loan participations or other forms of debt instruments.

Pooled Funds

The fund may, notwithstanding any other fundamental investment policy or limitation, invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company with substantially the same fundamental investment objective, policies, and limitations as the fund.

The following investment limitations are not fundamental and may be changed without shareholder approval.

Diversification

With respect to 75% of its total assets, the fund does not currently intend to purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, or securities of other money market funds) if, as a result, more than 5% of the fund's total assets would be invested in the securities of that issuer.

For purposes of the fund's diversification limitation discussed above, FMR identifies the issuer of a security depending on its terms and conditions. In identifying the issuer, FMR will consider the entity or entities responsible for payment of interest and repayment of principal and source of such payments; the way in which assets and revenues of an issuing political subdivision are separated from those of other political entities; and whether a governmental body is guaranteeing the security.

For purposes of the fund's diversification limitation discussed above, certain securities subject to guarantees (including insurance, letters of credit and demand features) are not considered securities of their issuer, but are subject to separate diversification requirements, in accordance with industry standard requirements for money market funds.

Short Sales

The fund does not currently intend to sell securities short, unless it owns or has the right to obtain securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold short, and provided that transactions in futures contracts and options are not deemed to constitute selling securities short.

Margin Purchases

The fund does not currently intend to purchase securities on margin, except that the fund may obtain such short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of transactions, and provided that margin payments in connection with futures contracts and options on futures contracts shall not constitute purchasing securities on margin.

Borrowing

The fund may borrow money only (a) from a bank or from a registered investment company or portfolio for which FMR or an affiliate serves as investment adviser or (b) by engaging in reverse repurchase agreements with any party (reverse repurchase agreements are treated as borrowings for purposes of the fundamental borrowing investment limitation).

Illiquid Securities

The fund does not currently intend to purchase any security if, as a result, more than 10% of its net assets would be invested in securities that are deemed to be illiquid because they are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale or because they cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued.

For purposes of the fund's illiquid securities limitation discussed above, if through a change in values, net assets, or other circumstances, the fund were in a position where more than 10% of its net assets were invested in illiquid securities, it would consider appropriate steps to protect liquidity.

Loans

The fund does not currently intend to engage in repurchase agreements or make loans, but this limitation does not apply to purchases of debt securities.

Pooled Funds

The fund does not currently intend to invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company with substantially the same fundamental investment objective, policies, and limitations as the fund.

The following pages contain more detailed information about types of instruments in which the fund may invest, strategies FMR may employ in pursuit of the fund's investment objective, and a summary of related risks. FMR may not buy all of these instruments or use all of these techniques unless it believes that doing so will help the fund achieve its goal.

Affiliated Bank Transactions. A fund may engage in transactions with financial institutions that are, or may be considered to be, "affiliated persons" of the fund under the 1940 Act. These transactions may involve repurchase agreements with custodian banks; short-term obligations of, and repurchase agreements with, the 50 largest U.S. banks (measured by deposits); municipal securities; U.S. Government securities with affiliated financial institutions that are primary dealers in these securities; short-term currency transactions; and short-term borrowings. In accordance with exemptive orders issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Board of Trustees has established and periodically reviews procedures applicable to transactions involving affiliated financial institutions.

Borrowing. The fund may borrow from banks or from other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates, or through reverse repurchase agreements, and may make additional investments while borrowings are outstanding.

Cash Management. A fund can hold uninvested cash. A municipal fund's uninvested cash may earn credits that reduce fund expenses.

Central Funds are special types of investment vehicles created by Fidelity for use by the Fidelity funds and other advisory clients. FMR uses central funds to invest in particular security types or investment disciplines, or for cash management. Central funds incur certain costs related to their investment activity (such as custodial fees and expenses), but do not pay additional management fees to Fidelity. The investment results of the portions of the fund's assets invested in the central funds will be based upon the investment results of those funds.

Illiquid Securities cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or may be costly to a fund. Under the supervision of the Board of Trustees, FMR determines the liquidity of a fund's investments and, through reports from FMR, the Board monitors investments in illiquid securities. In determining the liquidity of a fund's investments, various factors may be considered, including (1) the frequency and volume of trades and quotations, (2) the number of dealers and prospective purchasers in the marketplace, (3) dealer undertakings to make a market, and (4) the nature of the security and the market in which it trades (including any demand, put or tender features, the mechanics and other requirements for transfer, any letters of credit or other credit enhancement features, any ratings, the number of holders, the method of soliciting offers, the time required to dispose of the security, and the ability to assign or offset the rights and obligations of the security).

Interfund Borrowing and Lending Program. Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC, a fund may lend money to, and borrow money from, other funds advised by FMR or its affiliates; however, municipal funds currently intend to participate in this program only as borrowers. A fund will borrow through the program only when the costs are equal to or lower than the costs of bank loans. Interfund borrowings normally extend overnight, but can have a maximum duration of seven days. Loans may be called on one day's notice. A fund may have to borrow from a bank at a higher interest rate if an interfund loan is called or not renewed.

Inverse Floaters have variable interest rates that typically move in the opposite direction from movements in prevailing short-term interest rate levels - rising when prevailing short-term interest rates fall, and falling when short-term interest rates rise. The prices of inverse floaters can be considerably more volatile than the prices of other investments with comparable maturities and/or credit quality.

Money Market Securities are high-quality, short-term obligations. Money market securities may be structured to be, or may employ a trust or other form so that they are, eligible investments for money market funds. For example, put features can be used to modify the maturity of a security or interest rate adjustment features can be used to enhance price stability. If a structure fails to function as intended, adverse tax or investment consequences may result. Neither the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) nor any other regulatory authority has ruled definitively on certain legal issues presented by certain structured securities. Future tax or other regulatory determinations could adversely affect the value, liquidity, or tax treatment of the income received from these securities or the nature and timing of distributions made by the fund.

Municipal Insurance. A municipal bond may be covered by insurance that guarantees the bond's scheduled payment of interest and repayment of principal. This type of insurance may be obtained by either (i) the issuer at the time the bond is issued (primary market insurance), or (ii) another party after the bond has been issued (secondary market insurance).

Both primary and secondary market insurance guarantee timely and scheduled repayment of all principal and payment of all interest on a municipal bond in the event of default by the issuer, and cover a municipal bond to its maturity, typically enhancing its credit quality and value.

Municipal bond insurance does not insure against market fluctuations or fluctuations in a fund's share price. In addition, a municipal bond insurance policy will not cover: (i) repayment of a municipal bond before maturity (redemption), (ii) prepayment or payment of an acceleration premium (except for a mandatory sinking fund redemption) or any other provision of a bond indenture that advances the maturity of the bond, or (iii) nonpayment of principal or interest caused by negligence or bankruptcy of the paying agent. A mandatory sinking fund redemption may be a provision of a municipal bond issue whereby part of the municipal bond issue may be retired before maturity.

Because a significant portion of the municipal securities issued and outstanding is insured by a small number of insurance companies, not all of which have the highest credit rating, an event involving one or more of these insurance companies could have a significant adverse effect on the value of the securities insured by that insurance company and on the municipal markets as a whole. Ratings of insured bonds reflect the credit rating of the insurer, based on the rating agency's assessment of the creditworthiness of the insurer and its ability to pay claims on its insurance policies at the time of the assessment. While the obligation of a municipal bond insurance company to pay a claim extends over the life of an insured bond, there is no assurance that municipal bond insurers will meet their claims. A higher-than-anticipated default rate on municipal bonds or in connection with other insurance the insurer provides could strain the insurer's loss reserves and adversely affect its ability to pay claims to bondholders.

FMR may decide to retain an insured municipal bond that is in default, or, in FMR's view, in significant risk of default. While a fund holds a defaulted, insured municipal bond, the fund collects interest payments from the insurer and retains the right to collect principal from the insurer when the municipal bond matures, or in connection with a mandatory sinking fund redemption.

Municipal Leases and participation interests therein may take the form of a lease, an installment purchase, or a conditional sale contract and are issued by state and local governments and authorities to acquire land or a wide variety of equipment and facilities. Generally, a fund will not hold these obligations directly as a lessor of the property, but will purchase a participation interest in a municipal obligation from a bank or other third party. A participation interest gives the purchaser a specified, undivided interest in the obligation in proportion to its purchased interest in the total amount of the issue.

Municipal leases frequently have risks distinct from those associated with general obligation or revenue bonds. State constitutions and statutes set forth requirements that states or municipalities must meet to incur debt. These may include voter referenda, interest rate limits, or public sale requirements. Leases, installment purchases, or conditional sale contracts (which normally provide for title to the leased asset to pass to the governmental issuer) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property and equipment without meeting their constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt. Many leases and contracts include "non-appropriation clauses" providing that the governmental issuer has no obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for such purposes by the appropriate legislative body on a yearly or other periodic basis. Non-appropriation clauses free the issuer from debt issuance limitations. If a municipality stops making payments or transfers its obligations to a private entity, the obligation could lose value or become taxable.

Municipal Market Disruption Risk. The value of municipal securities may be affected by uncertainties in the municipal market related to legislation or litigation involving the taxation of municipal securities or the rights of municipal securities holders in the event of a bankruptcy. Proposals to restrict or eliminate the federal income tax exemption for interest on municipal securities are introduced before Congress from time to time. Proposals also may be introduced before the California legislature that would affect the state tax treatment of a municipal fund's distributions. If such proposals were enacted, the availability of municipal securities and the value of a municipal fund's holdings would be affected, and the Trustees would reevaluate the fund's investment objectives and policies. Municipal bankruptcies are relatively rare, and certain provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code governing such bankruptcies are unclear and remain untested. Further, the application of state law to municipal issuers could produce varying results among the states or among municipal securities issuers within a state. These legal uncertainties could affect the municipal securities market generally, certain specific segments of the market, or the relative credit quality of particular securities. Any of these effects could have a significant impact on the prices of some or all of the municipal securities held by a fund, making it more difficult for a money market fund to maintain a stable net asset value per share (NAV).

Education. In general, there are two types of education-related bonds: those issued to finance projects for public and private colleges and universities, and those representing pooled interests in student loans. Bonds issued to supply educational institutions with funds are subject to the risk of unanticipated revenue decline, primarily the result of decreasing student enrollment or decreasing state and federal funding. Among the factors that may lead to declining or insufficient revenues are restrictions on students' ability to pay tuition, availability of state and federal funding, and general economic conditions. Student loan revenue bonds are generally offered by state (or substate) authorities or commissions and are backed by pools of student loans. Underlying student loans may be guaranteed by state guarantee agencies and may be subject to reimbursement by the United States Department of Education through its guaranteed student loan program. Others may be private, uninsured loans made to parents or students which are supported by reserves or other forms of credit enhancement. Recoveries of principal due to loan defaults may be applied to redemption of bonds or may be used to re-lend, depending on program latitude and demand for loans. Cash flows supporting student loan revenue bonds are impacted by numerous factors, including the rate of student loan defaults, seasoning of the loan portfolio, and student repayment deferral periods of forbearance. Other risks associated with student loan revenue bonds include potential changes in federal legislation regarding student loan revenue bonds, state guarantee agency reimbursement and continued federal interest and other program subsidies currently in effect.

Electric Utilities. The electric utilities industry has been experiencing, and will continue to experience, increased competitive pressures. Federal legislation in the last two years will open transmission access to any electricity supplier, although it is not presently known to what extent competition will evolve. Other risks include: (a) the availability and cost of fuel, (b) the availability and cost of capital, (c) the effects of conservation on energy demand, (d) the effects of rapidly changing environmental, safety, and licensing requirements, and other federal, state, and local regulations, (e) timely and sufficient rate increases, and (f) opposition to nuclear power.

Health Care. The health care industry is subject to regulatory action by a number of private and governmental agencies, including federal, state, and local governmental agencies. A major source of revenues for the health care industry is payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs. As a result, the industry is sensitive to legislative changes and reductions in governmental spending for such programs. Numerous other factors may affect the industry, such as general and local economic conditions; demand for services; expenses (including malpractice insurance premiums); and competition among health care providers. In the future, the following elements may adversely affect health care facility operations: adoption of legislation proposing a national health insurance program; other state or local health care reform measures; medical and technological advances which dramatically alter the need for health services or the way in which such services are delivered; changes in medical coverage which alter the traditional fee-for-service revenue stream; and efforts by employers, insurers, and governmental agencies to reduce the costs of health insurance and health care services.

Housing. Housing revenue bonds are generally issued by a state, county, city, local housing authority, or other public agency. They generally are secured by the revenues derived from mortgages purchased with the proceeds of the bond issue. It is extremely difficult to predict the supply of available mortgages to be purchased with the proceeds of an issue or the future cash flow from the underlying mortgages. Consequently, there are risks that proceeds will exceed supply, resulting in early retirement of bonds, or that homeowner repayments will create an irregular cash flow. Many factors may affect the financing of multi-family housing projects, including acceptable completion of construction, proper management, occupancy and rent levels, economic conditions, and changes to current laws and regulations.

Transportation. Transportation debt may be issued to finance the construction of airports, toll roads, highways, or other transit facilities. Airport bonds are dependent on the general stability of the airline industry and on the stability of a specific carrier who uses the airport as a hub. Air traffic generally follows broader economic trends and is also affected by the price and availability of fuel. Toll road bonds are also affected by the cost and availability of fuel as well as toll levels, the presence of competing roads and the general economic health of an area. Fuel costs and availability also affect other transportation-related securities, as do the presence of alternate forms of transportation, such as public transportation.

Water and Sewer. Water and sewer revenue bonds are often considered to have relatively secure credit as a result of their issuer's importance, monopoly status, and generally unimpeded ability to raise rates. Despite this, lack of water supply due to insufficient rain, run-off, or snow pack is a concern that has led to past defaults. Further, public resistance to rate increases, costly environmental litigation, and Federal environmental mandates are challenges faced by issuers of water and sewer bonds.

Put Features entitle the holder to sell a security back to the issuer or a third party at any time or at specified intervals. In exchange for this benefit, a fund may accept a lower interest rate. Securities with put features are subject to the risk that the put provider is unable to honor the put feature (purchase the security). Put providers often support their ability to buy securities on demand by obtaining letters of credit or other guarantees from other entities. Demand features, standby commitments, and tender options are types of put features.

Repurchase Agreements involve an agreement to purchase a security and to sell that security back to the original seller at an agreed-upon price. The resale price reflects the purchase price plus an agreed-upon incremental amount which is unrelated to the coupon rate or maturity of the purchased security. As protection against the risk that the original seller will not fulfill its obligation, the securities are held in a separate account at a bank, marked-to-market daily, and maintained at a value at least equal to the sale price plus the accrued incremental amount. The value of the security purchased may be more or less than the price at which the counterparty has agreed to purchase the security. In addition, delays or losses could result if the other party to the agreement defaults or becomes insolvent. The fund will engage in repurchase agreement transactions with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR.

Restricted Securities are subject to legal restrictions on their sale. Difficulty in selling securities may result in a loss or be costly to a fund. Restricted securities generally can be sold in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 Act), or in a registered public offering. Where registration is required, the holder of a registered security may be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expense and a considerable period may elapse between the time it decides to seek registration and the time it may be permitted to sell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, the holder might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to seek registration of the security.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, a fund sells a security to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash and agrees to repurchase that security at an agreed-upon price and time. The fund will enter into reverse repurchase agreements with parties whose creditworthiness has been reviewed and found satisfactory by FMR. Such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of fund assets and a fund's yield and may be viewed as a form of leverage.

Securities of Other Investment Companies, including shares of closed-end investment companies, unit investment trusts, and open-end investment companies, represent interests in professionally managed portfolios that may invest in any type of instrument. Investing in other investment companies involves substantially the same risks as investing directly in the underlying instruments, but may involve additional expenses at the investment company-level, such as portfolio management fees and operating expenses. Certain types of investment companies, such as closed-end investment companies, issue a fixed number of shares that trade on a stock exchange or over-the-counter at a premium or a discount to their NAV. Others are continuously offered at NAV, but may also be traded in the secondary market.

The extent to which a fund can invest in securities of other investment companies may be limited by federal securities laws.

Sources of Liquidity or Credit Support. Issuers may employ various forms of credit and liquidity enhancements, including letters of credit, guarantees, swaps, puts, and demand features, and insurance provided by domestic or foreign entities such as banks and other financial institutions. For purposes of making initial and ongoing minimal credit risk determinations, FMR and its affiliates may rely on their evaluation of the credit of the issuer or the credit of the liquidity or credit enhancement provider. In evaluating the credit of a foreign bank or other foreign entities, factors considered may include whether adequate public information about the entity is available and whether the entity may be subject to unfavorable political or economic developments, currency controls, or other government restrictions that might affect its ability to honor its commitment. Changes in the credit quality of the issuer and/or entity providing the enhancement could affect the value of the security or a fund's share price.

Temporary Defensive Policies. The fund reserves the right to hold a substantial amount of uninvested cash for temporary, defensive purposes. In addition, the fund reserves the right to invest more than normally permitted in taxable obligations for temporary, defensive purposes.

Tender Option Bonds are created by depositing intermediate- or long-term, fixed-rate or variable rate, municipal bonds into a trust and issuing two classes of trust interests (or "certificates") with varying economic interests to investors. Holders of the first class of trust interests, or floating rate certificates, receive tax-exempt interest based on short-term rates and may tender the certificate to the trust at par. As consideration for providing the tender option, the trust sponsor (typically a bank, broker-dealer, or other financial institution) receives periodic fees. The trust pays the holders of the floating rate certificates from proceeds of a remarketing of the certificates or from a draw on a liquidity facility provided by the sponsor. A fund investing in a floating rate certificate effectively holds a demand obligation that bears interest at the prevailing short-term tax-exempt rate. The floating rate certificate is typically an eligible security for money market funds. Holders of the second class of interests, sometimes called the residual income certificates, are entitled to any tax-exempt interest received by the trust that is not payable to floating rate certificate holders, and bear the risk that the underlying municipal bonds decline in value. In selecting tender option bonds, FMR will consider the creditworthiness of the issuer of the underlying bond deposited in the trust, the experience of the custodian, and the quality of the sponsor providing the tender option. In certain instances, the tender option may be terminated if, for example, the issuer of the underlying bond defaults on interest payments.

Transfer Agent Bank Accounts. Proceeds from shareholder purchases of a fund pass through a series of demand deposit bank accounts before being held at the fund's custodian. Redemption proceeds will pass from the custodian to the shareholder through a similar series of bank accounts.

The bank accounts are registered to the transfer agent or an affiliate, who acts as an agent for the fund when opening, closing and conducting business in the bank accounts. The transfer agent or an affiliate may invest overnight balances in the accounts in repurchase agreements. Any balances that are not invested in repurchase agreements remain in the bank accounts overnight. Any risks associated with these accounts are investment risks of the fund. The fund faces the risk of loss of these balances if the bank becomes insolvent.

Variable and Floating Rate Securities provide for periodic adjustments in the interest rate paid on the security. Variable rate securities provide for a specified periodic adjustment in the interest rate, while floating rate securities have interest rates that change whenever there is a change in a designated benchmark rate or the issuer's credit quality. Some variable or floating rate securities are structured with put features that permit holders to demand payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest from the issuers or certain financial intermediaries.

When-Issued and Forward Purchase or Sale Transactions involve a commitment to purchase or sell specific securities at a predetermined price or yield in which payment and delivery take place after the customary settlement period for that type of security. Typically, no interest accrues to the purchaser until the security is delivered.

When purchasing securities pursuant to one of these transactions, the purchaser assumes the rights and risks of ownership, including the risks of price and yield fluctuations and the risk that the security will not be issued as anticipated. Because payment for the securities is not required until the delivery date, these risks are in addition to the risks associated with a fund's investments. If a fund remains substantially fully invested at a time when a purchase is outstanding, the purchases may result in a form of leverage. When a fund has sold a security pursuant to one of these transactions, the fund does not participate in further gains or losses with respect to the security. If the other party to a delayed-delivery transaction fails to deliver or pay for the securities, a fund could miss a favorable price or yield opportunity or suffer a loss.

A fund may renegotiate a when-issued or forward transaction and may sell the underlying securities before delivery, which may result in capital gains or losses for the fund.

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING CALIFORNIA

<R>The following section provides only a summary of (and does not purport to explain, predict, or fully describe) the complex factors, including both economic and political conditions, affecting the financial situation in the State of California (as used in this section, the "State") and is based on information in publicly available documents. This information has not been independently verified. The information provided below is subject to change rapidly, substantially, and without notice, and the inclusion of such information herein shall not under any circumstances create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the State or its issuers since the date of its preparation. Any such change(s) may adversely affect the State's and applicable issuer's cash flows, expenditures, or revenues, or otherwise negatively impact the current or projected State financial situation, which in turn could hamper fund performance.</R>

<R>Further, the marketability, valuation or liquidity of State municipal securities may be negatively affected in the event that State localities or authorities default on their debt obligations or other market events arise, which in turn may negatively affect fund performance, sometimes substantially. Economic and other conditions within the State may affect the credit risk of those localities or authorities to the extent that such localities and authorities are reliant upon State appropriations. In addition, the difficulties encountered by bond insurers in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis and other credit and overall market events may continue to impact municipal securities negatively, and the full effects of these events remain uncertain.</R>

<R>Overview of State Economy. California's economy, the largest among the 50 states, has major components in high technology, trade, entertainment, agriculture, manufacturing, government, tourism, construction, and services. The relative proportion of the various components of the California economy closely resembles the make-up of the national economy, and as a result events which negatively affect such industries may have a similar impact on the State and national economies. </R>

<R>In the Governor's proposed budget for the 2010-11 fiscal year, released on January 8, 2010 (2010-11 Governor's Budget), the California Department of Finance (Department of Finance) projected that the State's economy started to recover from the recession in the latter part of calendar year 2009, but that the State would suffer continued job losses in calendar year 2010. As of December 2009, the State's unemployment rate was 12.4%, compared to 10% for the nation as a whole for the same period.</R>

<R>Current Economic Conditions. Since the start of calendar year 2008, the State has experienced the most significant economic downturn and financial pressure since the Great Depression of the 1930s. As a result of continuing weakness in the State economy, State tax revenues have declined precipitously, resulting in large budget gaps and cash shortfalls. The California Legislature and the California Governor adopted three major budget plans, covering both the 2008-09 and 2009-10 fiscal years, in less than 11 months, utilizing approximately $60 billion in budget solutions, in response to continuing deterioration in the State's fiscal condition. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget estimated a new budget gap of $19.9 billion, of which $6.6 billion is estimated to be attributable to the 2009-10 fiscal year. The major reasons for the new budget gap included continued deterioration of revenues, certain federal and state court decisions, and failure to achieve all the budget solutions and savings expected from previously-enacted budgets. The Governor proposed a large number of steps to close this gap, consisting principally of expenditure reductions, seeking additional aid from the Federal government, various shifts in funding responsibilities and new revenue sources. The Governor declared a fiscal emergency and called a special session of the Legislature beginning January 8, 2010, to address budget solutions. The special session is described in more detail below under "March 2010 Special Session."</R>

<R>The sharp drop in revenues in fiscal years 2008-09 and 2009-10 also resulted in a significant depletion of cash resources to pay the State's obligations. For a period of one month beginning in February 2009, the State deferred making certain payments from the State's General Fund (General Fund) in order to conserve cash resources for high priority obligations, such as education and debt service. As new budget gaps were identified, the State's cash resources became so depleted that, commencing July 2, 2009, the State Controller (Controller) began to issue registered warrants (IOUs) for certain lower priority obligations in lieu of checks which could be immediately cashed. In late August 2009, the state called all $2.6 billion of its outstanding IOUs for redemption on September 4, 2009. This was only the second issuance of IOUs by the State since the 1930s.</R>

<R>The 2010-11 Governor's Budget and the Controller projected continuing cash pressures during fiscal year 2010-11. Legislation enacted during the fiscal emergency special session in early March 2010 may provide the State with authority to defer certain payments to help the State avoid cash flow difficulties during the 2010-11 fiscal year. However, absent further corrective action by the Legislature and timely adoption of a fiscal year 2010-11 budget, a cash flow shortage in fiscal year 2010-11 may require the issuance of IOUs. </R>

<R>There can be no assurances that the fiscal stress and cash pressures currently facing the state will not continue or become more difficult, or that continuing declines in State tax receipts or other impacts of the current economic situation will not further materially adversely affect the financial condition of the State. The Department of Finance projects that multi-billion dollar budget gaps will occur annually though at least fiscal year 2013-14 without further corrective action.</R>

<R>In addition, the pension funds managed by the State's principal retirement systems, the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the California State Teachers' Retirement System, have sustained significant investment losses during the economic downturn and face unfunded actuarial liabilities which will require increased contributions from the General Fund in future years. The State also has an unfunded liability relating to retirees' post-employment healthcare benefits which is estimated to be $51.8 billion as of June 30, 2009.</R>

<R>The expenditure reductions and extraordinary pressures on the State budget in recent years have resulted in continuing fiscal pressures on local governments throughout the State. Several years of budget borrowing from transportation funds have left many State and local transportation construction projects without adequate funds. The current economic slowdown and projected reductions in State aid have left many local governments with substantial budget deficits, resulting in reductions in payroll and services.</R>

<R>There is no assurance that any California issuer will make full or timely payments of principal or interest or remain solvent. It should be noted that the creditworthiness of obligations issued by local California issuers may be unrelated to the creditworthiness of obligations issued by the State, and there is no obligation on the part of the State to make payment on such local obligations in the event of default.</R>

<R>The economic forecasts of the Department of Finance, the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO), and the Controller are prepared using national economic activity forecasts; major national and California economic indicators; revenue estimates; legislative, judicial and administrative changes; and recent cash results.</R>

<R>General Risks. Many complex political, social, and economic factors influence the State's economy and finances. Such factors may affect the State's budget unpredictably from year to year. Such factors include, but are not limited to: (i) the performance of the national and State economies; (ii) the receipt of revenues below projections; (iii) a delay in or an inability of the State to implement budget solutions as a result of current or future litigation; (iv) an inability to implement all planned expenditure reductions; and (v) actions taken by the Federal government, including audits, disallowances, and changes in aid levels. </R>

<R>These factors are continually changing, and no assurances can be given with respect to how these factors or other factors will materialize in the future or what impact they will have on the State's fiscal and economic condition. Such factors could have an adverse impact on the State budget in the current year and could result in declines, possibly severe, in the value of the State's and municipal issuers' outstanding obligations, increases in their future borrowing costs, and impairment of their ability to pay debt service on their obligations. </R>

<R>Recent Events in the Municipal Bond Market. A significant number of auction rate municipal bonds have failed to attract buyers, resulting in "failed auctions" and a resetting of the periodic rates to rates in excess of those which would otherwise prevail in the short-term market. The failed auctions have affected municipal issuers throughout the United States and its territories and reflect concerns relating to bond insurers that have insured those bonds as well as changes in the operation of the auction rate itself. As a result of these failed auctions, governmental issuers are experiencing significantly higher debt service costs on auction rate bonds and bondholders are experiencing less liquidity than had been anticipated. The duration of the disruption in the auction rate securities market cannot be predicted at this time. In addition, the value of municipal securities may be difficult to measure in the current or a future market environment, as current valuation, significantly affected by external forces, may not reflect the intrinsic, underlying value of State municipal securities. Should the State or municipalities fail to sell bonds when and at the rates projected, the State could experience significantly increased costs in the General Fund and a weakened overall cash position in the current fiscal year.</R>

<R>Constitutional Limitations on Taxes, Other Charges and Appropriations.</R>

<R>Limitation on Property Taxes. Certain California debt obligations may be obligations of issuers which rely in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, on ad valorem property taxes as a source of revenue. The taxing powers of California local governments and districts are limited by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1978 and commonly known as "Proposition 13." Briefly, Article XIIIA limits the rate of ad valorem property taxes to 1% of full cash value of real property and generally restricts the reassessment of property to 2% per year, except upon new construction or change of ownership (subject to a number of exemptions). Taxing entities may, however, raise ad valorem taxes above the 1% limit to pay debt service on voter-approved bonded indebtedness.</R>

<R>Under Article XIIIA, the basic 1% ad valorem tax levy is applied against the assessed value of property as of the owner's date of acquisition (or as of March 1, 1975, if acquired earlier), subject to certain adjustments. This system has resulted in widely varying amounts of tax on similarly situated properties. Several lawsuits were filed challenging the acquisition-based assessment system of Proposition 13, but it was upheld by the United States Supreme Court in 1992.</R>

<R>Article XIIIA prohibits local governments from raising revenues through ad valorem taxes above the 1% limit; it also requires voters of any governmental unit to give two-thirds approval to levy any "special tax" (a tax devoted to a specific purpose). </R>

<R>Limitations on Other Taxes, Fees and Charges. On November 5, 1996, the voters of the State approved Proposition 218, called the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act." Proposition 218 added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the State Constitution, which contain a number of provisions affecting the ability of local agencies to levy and collect both existing and future taxes, assessments, fees and charges.</R>

<R>Article XIIIC requires that all new or increased local taxes be submitted to the voters before they become effective. Taxes for general governmental purposes require a majority vote and taxes for specific purposes require a two-thirds vote.</R>

<R>Article XIIID contains several provisions which make it generally more difficult for local agencies to levy and maintain "assessments" for municipal services and programs. Article XIIID also contains several provisions affecting "fees" and "charges", defined for purposes of Article XIIID to mean "any levy other than an ad valorem tax, a special tax, or an assessment, imposed by a local government upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including a user fee or charge for a property related service." All new and existing property related fees and charges must conform to requirements prohibiting, among other things, fees and charges which generate revenues exceeding the funds required to provide the property related service or are used for unrelated purposes. Article XIIID contains notice, hearing and protest procedures for levying or increasing property related fees and charges, and, except for fees or charges for sewer, water and refuse collection services (or fees for electrical and gas service, which are not treated as "property related" for purposes of Article XIIID), no property related fee or charge may be imposed or increased without majority approval by the property owners subject to the fee or charge or, at the option of the local agency, two-thirds voter approval by the electorate residing in the affected area.</R>

<R>In addition to the provisions described above, Article XIIIC removes limitations on the initiative power in matters of local taxes, assessments, fees and charges. Consequently, local voters could, by future initiative, repeal, reduce or prohibit the future imposition or increase of any local tax, assessment, fee or charge. It is unclear how this right of local initiative may be used in cases where taxes or charges have been or will be specifically pledged to secure debt issues.</R>

<R>The interpretation and application of Proposition 218 will ultimately be determined by the courts with respect to a number of matters, and it is not possible at this time to predict with certainty the outcome of such cases.</R>

<R>Appropriations Limits. The State and its local governments are subject to an annual "appropriations limit" imposed by Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, enacted by the voters in 1979 and significantly amended by Propositions 98 and 111 in 1988 and 1990, respectively. Article XIIIB prohibits the State or any covered local government from spending "appropriations subject to limitation" in excess of the appropriations limit imposed. "Appropriations subject to limitation" are authorizations to spend "proceeds of taxes," which consist of tax revenues and certain other funds, including proceeds from regulatory licenses, user charges or other fees, to the extent that such proceeds exceed the cost of providing the product or service, but "proceeds of taxes" exclude most State subventions to local governments. No limit is imposed on appropriations of funds which are not "proceeds of taxes," such as reasonable user charges or fees, and certain other non-tax funds, including bond proceeds.</R>

<R>Among the expenditures not included in the Article XIIIB appropriations limit are: (i) the debt service cost of bonds issued or authorized prior to January 1, 1979, or subsequently authorized by the voters, (ii) appropriations to comply with mandates of courts or the federal government, (iii) appropriations for certain capital outlay projects, (iv) appropriations by the State of post-1989 increases in gasoline taxes and vehicle weight fees, and (v) appropriations made in certain cases of emergency.</R>

<R>The appropriations limit for each year is adjusted annually to reflect changes in cost of living and population, and any transfers of service responsibilities between government units. The definitions for such adjustments were liberalized in 1990 to follow more closely growth in the State's economy.</R>

<R>"Excess" revenues are measured over a two year cycle. Local governments must return any excess to taxpayers by rate reductions. The State must refund 50% of any excess, with the other 50% paid to schools and community colleges. Local governments may by voter approval exceed their spending limits for up to four years.</R>

<R>According to the Department of Finance, the State was approximately $16.9 billion and $31.6 billion below the appropriations limit in fiscal years 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively. The Department of Finance estimates that the State will be approximately $23.1 billion and $20.8 billion below its appropriations limit in fiscal years 2009-10 and 2010-11, respectively.</R>

<R>Because of the complex nature of Articles XIIIA, XIIIB, XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution, the ambiguities and possible inconsistencies in their terms, and the impossibility of predicting future appropriations or changes in population and cost of living, and the probability of continuing legal challenges, it is not currently possible to determine fully the impact of these Articles on California debt obligations or on the ability of the State or local governments to pay debt service on such California debt obligations. It is not possible, at the present time, to predict the outcome of any pending litigation with respect to the ultimate scope, impact or constitutionality of these Articles or the impact of any such determinations upon State agencies or local governments, or upon their ability to pay debt service on their obligations. Further initiatives or legislative changes in laws or the California Constitution may also affect the ability of the State or local issuers to repay their obligations.</R>

<R>Obligations of the State. The State Treasurer (Treasurer) is responsible for the sale of most debt obligations of the State and its various authorities.</R>

<R>General Obligation Bonds. General obligation bonds are typically authorized for infrastructure and other capital improvements at the State and local level. Under the California Constitution, debt service on outstanding general obligation bonds is the second charge to the General Fund after support of the public school system and public institutions of higher education.</R>

<R>As of February 1, 2010, the State had outstanding approximately $72.9 billion aggregate principal amount of long-term general obligation bonds, of which approximately $63.4 billion were payable primarily from the General Fund, and approximately $9.5 billion were self-liquidating bonds payable first from other special revenue funds. As of February 1, 2010, there were unused voter authorizations for the future issuance of approximately $48.8 billion of long-term general obligation bonds, some of which may be first issued as commercial paper notes. Of this unissued amount, approximately $1.3 billion is for general obligation bonds payable first from other revenue sources. </R>

<R>General Fund Debt Ratio. Between November 2006 and August 2009, voters and the legislature authorized more than $60 billion of new general obligation bonds and lease revenue bonds, which are paid solely from the General Fund. This new authorization substantially increased the current amount of such General Fund-supported debt outstanding to more than $72 billion, while still leaving authorized and unissued approximately $58 billion of such bonds as of February 1, 2010. In order to address the expenditure needs for these new authorizations, along with those which existed prior to 2006, the State increased the volume of issuance of both of these categories of bonds substantially, compared to previous years, starting in fiscal year 2007-08.</R>

<R>Disruptions in the financial markets and uncertainties about the State's budget condition caused significant disruptions in the State's bond issuance program during fiscal year 2008-09. Because of these factors, the State did not issue any new general obligation bonds between July 2008 and March 2009. In March 2009, the State issued $6.54 billion of new tax-exempt bonds, the largest new money general obligation bond issue in the State's history (excluding Economic Recovery Bonds (ERBs)). A few weeks later, the State issued $6.86 billion of federally taxable general obligation bonds in reliance on new federal rules. A significant part of the revenue raised from these offerings was used to retire internal borrowings that had been used to fund construction projects. An additional $6.546 billion of tax exempt and taxable general obligation bonds were issued in the fall of 2009, together with $1.549 billion of lease revenue bonds.</R>

<R>Although a record of approximately $20 billion of general obligation bonds was offered during calendar year 2009, the scale of issuances is projected to be much lower in calendar year 2010. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget projects issuance of approximately $13.2 billion of general obligation and lease revenue bonds in fiscal year 2010-11.</R>

<R>In light of the drop in General Fund revenues since fiscal year 2007-08, and the projections of new bond sales in the future, the ratio of debt service on general obligation, lease revenue, and Proposition 1A bonds supported by the General Fund to annual General Fund revenues and transfers (General Fund Debt Ratio) is expected to increase in future years. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget estimates that in fiscal year 2009-10, the General Fund Debt Ratio is estimated to equal approximately 6.91%. Through fiscal year 2013-14, the State's General Fund Debt Ratio is projected to peak at 10.47% in fiscal year 2012-2013, the year that the Proposition 1A bonds mature. </R>

<R>The deterioration of the State's fiscal situation increases the risk of investing in California municipal securities, including the risk of potential issuer default, and also heightens the risk that the prices of California municipal securities held by a fund will experience greater volatility.</R>

<R>Non-Recourse Obligations. Certain State agencies and authorities issue obligations secured or payable from specified revenue streams, including transportation projects, various public works projects, and public and private educational facilities. These obligations are not payable from the General Fund and carry different ratings than the State's general obligation bonds. State agencies and authorities had approximately $56 billion aggregate principal amount of revenue bonds and notes which are non-recourse to the General Fund outstanding as of December 31, 2009. None of these revenue bonds is backed by the State's faith and credit or taxing power.</R>

<R>Obligations of Other Issuers.</R>

<R>Other Issuers of California Debt Obligations. There are a number of State agencies, instrumentalities and political subdivisions of the State that issue municipal obligations, some of which may be conduit revenue obligations payable from payments from private borrowers. These entities are subject to various economic risks and uncertainties, and the credit quality of the securities issued by them may vary considerably from the credit quality of obligations backed by the full faith and credit of the State.</R>

<R>State Assistance. Property tax revenues received by local governments declined more than 50% following passage of Proposition 13. Subsequently, the Legislature enacted measures to provide for the redistribution of the General Fund's surplus to local agencies, the reallocation of certain State revenues to local agencies and the assumption of certain governmental functions by the State to assist municipal issuers to raise revenues. Total local assistance from the General Fund has been budgeted at approximately 75% of General Fund expenditures in recent years, including the effect of implementing reductions in certain aid programs. To reduce State General Fund support for school districts, the 1992-93 and 1993-94 Budget Acts caused local governments to transfer $3.9 billion of property tax revenues to school districts, representing loss of the post-Proposition 13 "bailout" aid. Local governments have in return received greater revenues and greater flexibility to operate health and welfare programs.</R>

<R> The enactment of Proposition 1A in November 2004 substantially changed the ability of the State to use local government taxing sources to aid the State budget. See "State-Local Fiscal Relations" below. </R>

<R>In 1997, a new program provided for the State to substantially take over funding for local trial courts (saving cities and counties some $400 million annually). In recent years, the State has provided over $350 million to support local law enforcement costs.</R>

<R>To the extent the State should be constrained by its Article XIIIB appropriations limit, or its obligation to conform to Proposition 98, or other fiscal considerations, the absolute level, or the rate of growth, of State assistance to local governments may continue to be reduced. Any such reductions in State aid could compound the serious fiscal constraints already experienced by many local governments, particularly counties. The recent economic slowdown in the State, with its corresponding reduction in State and local revenues, will put additional pressure on local government finances in the coming years.</R>

<R>Counties and cities may face further budgetary pressures as a result of changes in welfare and public assistance programs, which were enacted in August, 1997 in order to comply with the federal welfare reform law. Generally, counties play a large role in the new system, and are given substantial flexibility to develop and administer programs to bring aid recipients into the workforce. Counties are also given financial incentives if either at the county or Statewide level, the "Welfare-to-Work" programs exceed minimum targets; counties are also subject to financial penalties for failure to meet such targets. Counties remain responsible to provide "general assistance" for able-bodied indigents who are ineligible for other welfare programs.</R>

<R>Local governments are facing substantial increases in future pension liabilities and health care costs for retirees, and increases in current contribution rates, as a result of (a) generous new retirements benefits granted to employees during recent economic boom times, and (b) reduced earnings resulting from stock market declines.</R>

<R>Assessment Bonds. California assessment bonds may be adversely affected by a general decline in real estate values or a slowdown in real estate sales activity. In many cases, such bonds are secured by land which is undeveloped at the time of issuance but anticipated to be developed within a few years after issuance. In the event of such reduction or slowdown, such development may not occur or may be delayed, thereby increasing the risk of a default on the bonds. Because the special assessments or taxes securing these bonds are not the personal liability of the owners of the property assessed, the lien on the property is the only security for the bonds. Moreover, in most cases the issuer of these bonds is not required to make payments on the bonds in the event of delinquency in the payment of assessments or taxes, except from amounts, if any, in a reserve fund established for the bonds.</R>

<R>California Long-Term Lease Obligations. Based on a series of court decisions, certain long-term lease obligations, though typically payable from the general fund of the State or a municipality, are not considered "indebtedness" requiring voter approval. Such leases, however, are subject to "abatement" in the event the facility being leased is unavailable for beneficial use and occupancy by the municipality during the term of the lease. Abatement is not a default, and there may be no remedies available to the holders of the certificates evidencing the lease obligation in the event abatement occurs. The most common cases of abatement are failure to complete construction of the facility before the end of the period during which lease payments have been capitalized and uninsured casualty losses to the facility (e.g., due to earthquake). In the event abatement occurs with respect to a lease obligation, lease payments may be interrupted (if all available insurance proceeds and reserves are exhausted) and the certificates may not be paid when due. Although litigation is brought from time to time which challenges the constitutionality of such lease arrangements, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling in August, 1998 which reconfirmed the legality of these financing methods.</R>

<R>2009-10 Budget.</R>

<R>Background. The State's budget for fiscal year 2009-10 was enacted in an unusual sequence. The Budget Act for the 2008-09 fiscal year (2008 Budget Act) was one of the latest ever enacted, having been delayed until mid-September 2008 as the result of the difficulty balancing the budget with reduced revenues, as declining economic conditions were already evident. The 2008 Budget Act, however, was based on revenue assumptions made in the spring of 2008, which proved to be overstated by the time the actual revenue results for September 2008 and October 2008 were received. With the financial market deterioration in September 2008, which resulted in massive federal assistance and caused large drops in stock market and other asset values and reductions in consumer spending, projections of tax revenues, which are heavily dependent on capital gains taxes and sales taxes, had to be dramatically reduced. In November 2008, the Governor announced that the 2008-09 fiscal year budget would be billions of dollars out of balance, and called several special sessions of the Legislature to enact corrective actions. </R>

<R>A compromise was not reached until February 2009. At that time, the February 2009 Budget Package was enacted, which included modifications to the 2008 Budget Act and the enactment, more than four months early, of a full budget act for fiscal year 2009-10.</R>

<R>Initial 2009 Budget Act. The Initial 2009 Budget Act was adopted by the Legislature on February 19, 2009, along with a number of implementing measures, and signed by the Governor on February 20, 2009. The Initial 2009 Budget Act enacted $36 billion in solutions to what was then estimated to be a $42 billion General Fund budget gap. It also provided for five budget-related measures that would have provided an estimated $6 billion in additional budget solutions. However, these measures were all rejected by voters at a May 19, 2009 special election.</R>

<R>After adoption of the Initial 2009 Budget Act, the State continued to experience significant declines in revenues and other financial pressures. On May 14, 2009, the Governor released a revision to the Initial 2009 Budget Act. Together with subsequent revisions, the 2009-10 May Revision identified further budget shortfalls through the 2009-10 fiscal year of approximately $24 billion.</R>

<R>Amended 2009 Budget Act. On July 24, 2009, the Legislature approved amendments to the Initial 2009 Budget Act and the Governor signed the Amended 2009 Budget Act on July 28, 2009. The Amended 2009 Budget Act included another $24 billion in solutions designed to address the further deterioration of the State's fiscal situation identified in the 2009-10 May Revision.</R>

<R>Under the Amended 2009 Budget Act, General Fund revenues and transfers were projected to increase 6.4%, from a revised $84.1 billion in fiscal year 2008-09 to $89.5 billion in fiscal year 2009-10. A significant element of this increase was projected to come from certain new revenue sources implemented in February 2008. The Amended 2009 Budget Act contained General Fund appropriations of $84.6 billion in fiscal year 2009-10, compared to $91.5 billion in fiscal year 2008-09, a 7.5% decrease. The June 30, 2010 total reserve was projected to be $500 million as compared to the revised June 30, 2009 reserve of negative $4.5 billion.</R>

<R>2010-11 Proposed Governor's Budget. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget, released on January 8, 2010, revises various revenue and expenditure estimates for fiscal year 2009-10 and proposes to solve the estimated $19.9 billion budget gap by the end of fiscal year 2010-11 with a combination of spending reductions, alternative funding, fund shifts, and additional federal funds.</R>

<R>Fiscal Year 2009-10 Revised Estimates in the 2010-11 Governor's Budget. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget revised various revenue and expenditures estimates for fiscal year 2009-10. It projects that the State will end fiscal year 2009-10 with a negative reserve of $5.4 billion, compared to the estimate of $500 million reserve at the time of the Amended 2009 Budget Act.</R>

<R>The 2010-11 Governor's Budget reflects a net decrease of $2.476 billion in revenues available from prior years at the start of fiscal year 2009-10. As of the 2010-11 Governor's Budget, General Fund revenues and transfers for fiscal year 2009-10 are projected to be $88.1 billion, a decrease of $1.457 billion compared with Amended 2009 Budget Act estimates. Also under the 2010-11 Governor's Budget, General Fund expenditures for fiscal year 2009-10 are projected at $86.1 billion, an increase of $1.5 billion compared with the Amended Budget Act estimates. This increase in expenditures (which is net of a decrease in Proposition 98 expenditures) is primarily attributable to increases in health and human service expenditures of $266.8 million; increases in prison expenditures of $906.6 million; and elimination of General Fund reimbursement of $81.6 million for transportation-related costs as a result of an adverse court decision which invalidated the use of Proposition 42 moneys for that purpose. </R>

<R>The 2010-11 Governor's Budget projects to end fiscal year 2010-11 with a $1.0 billion reserve. General Fund revenues and transfers for fiscal year 2010-11 are projected at $89.3 billion, and General Fund expenditures for fiscal year 2010-11 are projected at $82.9 billion. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget proposes a combined total of $19.9 billion of budget solutions for fiscal years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The solutions consist of $8.5 billion in expenditure restrictions (approximately 42.7% of the total solutions), $6.9 billion in federal funds solutions (approximately 34.7% of the total solutions), $3.9 billion in alternative funding solutions (approximately 19.6% of the total solutions), and $572 million in fund shifts and other revenues (approximately 2.8% of the total solutions).</R>

<R>Expenditure restrictions include $1.07 billion of reductions relating to Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid program); $1.0 billion in reductions relating to in-home supportive services; $1.63 billion in salary reductions; $2.43 billion reduction in Proposition 98 funding and $1.1 billion in reductions relating to prison and corrections expenditures. Alternative funding sources include $986 million relating to a gas tax shift; the use of $550 million in Proposition 10 moneys to offset General Fund expenditures for children's programs; and the use of $452 million of Proposition 63 moneys to offset General Fund expenditures for mental health programs. The use of Proposition 10 and Proposition 63 moneys described above require voter approval at the June 2010 primary election or November 2010 general election. </R>

<R>LAO Report. On January 12, 2010, the LAO released its analysis of the 2010-11 Governor's Budget (LAO Report). In reaching its conclusions, the LAO performs an independent assessment of the outlook for California's economy, demographics, revenues, and expenditures. The LAO Report states that the reasons for the State's current budget gap are similar to prior budget shortfalls: the inability of the State to achieve proposed budget solutions; the effects of adverse court decisions, and, for fiscal year 2010-11, the expiration of various one-time and temporary budget solutions approved in 2009.</R>

<R>The LAO Report expresses caution regarding the 2010-11 Governor's Budget due to certain risks, including the improbability of the United States Legislature agreeing to all of the Governor's requests for federal funds, and states that the California Legislature needs to operate on the assumption that federal government relief will total billions of dollars less than what the 2010-11 Governor's Budget assumes.</R>

<R>March 2010 Special Session. On January 8, 2010, concurrently with the submission of the 2010-11 Governor's Budget, the Governor declared a fiscal emergency and called the Legislature into a fiscal emergency special session. The nature of the fiscal emergency was the projected budget imbalance for fiscal year 2009-10 and the projected insufficient cash reserves and budgetary and cash deficits in fiscal year 2010-11. The purpose of the special session was for the Legislature to consider and act upon legislation included in the 2010-11 Governor's Budget that would close $8.9 billion of the budget gap. Delays in the adoption of the gap-closing proposals contained in the 2010-11 Governor's Budget until the enactment of the fiscal year 2010-11 budget would result in the loss of a portion of the proposed budgetary solutions and thereby necessitate more cuts in fiscal year 2010-11.</R>

<R>As of March 5, 2010, the Legislature had passed legislation intended to reduce the budget gap by about $3.2 billion. About $2.1 billion of the savings was intended to be obtained through expenditure reductions accomplished through appropriations targeted in fiscal year 2010-11. These intended reductions principally involved prison healthcare costs and employee compensation savings. On March 8, 2010, the Governor vetoed this $2.1 billion in savings. The remaining $1.1 billion of proposed solutions may be achieved through legislation intended to reduce the sales tax on gasoline and replace it with a higher excise tax, a portion of which would be applied to offset General Fund costs for certain transportation expenses. As of March 12, 2010, this legislation is still under consideration by the Governor, who has not indicated whether he will sign the bill. The special session ended on March 11, 2010. </R>

<R>As required by State law, the Governor will update the 2010-11 Governor's Budget by May 14, 2010. This updated budget (May Revision) will be the basis for the final negotiations between the governor and the Legislature to reach agreement on the fiscal year 2010-11 budget. </R>

<R>Balanced Budget Amendment. On March 2, 2004, voters approved Proposition 58, a constitutional amendment called the "Balanced Budget Amendment," which affects future State budgeting procedures. This amendment was linked to Proposition 57, also approved by the voters, which authorized issuance of $15 billion of long-term general obligation bonds, additionally secured by a 1/4 cent increment of the State's sales tax, which can be used to eliminate the accumulated budget deficits through June 30, 2004 and certain additional obligations incurred by the State.</R>

<R>The Balanced Budget Amendment requires the Legislature to enact a budget bill in which General Fund expenditures do not exceed estimated General Fund revenues and available reserves. After passage of the budget act, if the Governor determines that the State is facing substantial revenue shortfalls or spending deficiencies, the Governor may declare a fiscal emergency and propose legislation to address the emergency. The Legislature would be called in to special session to address this proposal. If the Legislature fails to send legislation to the Governor to address the fiscal emergency within 45 days, it will be prohibited from acting on any other bills or adjourning until fiscal legislation is passed. The Governor declared several such fiscal emergencies in 2008 and called the Legislature into various special sessions to address the recent current budget shortfall.</R>

<R>The Amendment also created a "rainy day" reserve called the Budget Stabilization Account ("BSA") in the State General Fund. Beginning in the 2006-07 fiscal year, a portion of estimated annual General Fund revenues are transferred by the Controller into the BSA not later than September 30 of each year. The transfer begins at 1% of revenues, and increases annually to reach a level of 3%. The initial transfers of $944 million and $2.045 billion took place in September 2006 and September 2007. The transfers are expected to continue until the BSA reaches a balance of the greater of $8 billion or 5% of General Fund revenue. Moneys in the BSA may be used to make up for unexpected budget imbalances, but will then have to be replenished with future transfers until the target level is reached. The annual transfer can be suspended by the Governor by an executive order issued not later than June 1 of the preceding fiscal year. The Amendment requires that one half of the BSA deposits, up to an aggregate of $5 billion, shall be transferred to the State Treasurer to provide for early redemption of the economic recovery bonds approved by Proposition 57. A total of $1.495 billion was transferred to retire economic recovery bonds in fiscal year 2006-07 ($472 million) and 2007-08 ($1.023 billion). The Governor suspended both the fiscal years 2008-09 and 2009-10 BSA transfers due to the condition of the General Fund, and the 2010-11 Governor's Budget assumes another suspension for fiscal year 2010-11.</R>

<R>A final provision of the Amendment prohibits future long-term bond issuances for the purpose of funding budget deficits once the bonds authorized by Proposition 57 are issued. Short term borrowing for cash flow management will continue to be authorized.</R>

<R>State-Local Fiscal Relations. In November, 2004, voters approved Proposition 1A, which made significant changes to the fiscal relationship between the State and local governments. In return for a $2.6 billion contribution to State budgets in the 2004-05 and 2005-06 fiscal years, Proposition 1A prohibits the State from accessing local governments' property tax, sales tax and vehicle license fee revenues except under limited circumstances. Starting in the 2008-09 fiscal year the State can borrow up to 8% of local property tax revenues but only if the Governor declares a fiscal hardship and with 2/3 approval of each house of the Legislature. This amount must be repaid within three years, and such borrowing can only be made twice in any ten-year period. In addition, the State cannot reduce the local sales tax rate or restrict authority of local governments to impose or change the distribution of the statewide local sales tax. Proposition 1A also strengthens requirements for the State to reimburse local governments if it enacts certain kinds of laws which mandate increased local spending. Proposition 1A is intended to produce greater certainty for local governments, but will reduce the State's options for dealing with budget shortfalls in the future.</R>

<R>The Amended 2009 Budget Act authorized the State to exercise its Proposition 1A borrowing authority. This borrowing generated $1.998 billion that will be used to offset General Fund costs for a variety of court, health, corrections, and K-12 programs. The enabling legislation also created a securitization mechanism for local governments to sell their right to receive the State's payment obligations to local government-operated joint powers agency (JPA). This JPA sold bonds in an aggregate amount of $1.895 billion in November 2009 to pay the local agencies their property tax allocations when they otherwise would receive them. Pursuant to Proposition 1A, the State is required to repay the local government borrowing (which in turn will be used to prepay the bonds of the JPA) no later than June 30, 2013. The 2010-11 Governor's Budget includes $90.8 million for the interest payments that will be incurred in fiscal year 2010-11 to be paid from the General Fund. </R>

<R>Strategic Growth Plan. In January 2006, the Governor proposed a comprehensive Strategic Growth Plan, which was to be the first installment of a 20-year investment in the State's infrastructure in the following five areas: transportation and air quality, education, flood control and water supply, public safety, and court and other public service infrastructure. Specifically, the plan laid out more than $222 billion in infrastructure investments over the first ten years, of which $68 billion would be financed with general obligation bonds, and the remainder would come from a mixture of existing and new funding sources.</R>

<R>In May 2006, the Legislature adopted a package of bills providing part of the infrastructure financing plan requested by the Governor. The main components of this package included four proposed bond measures on the November, 2006 ballot, containing the following elements: (i) $19.9 billion for transportation, air quality, port security and related projects; (ii) $10.4 billion for K-12 school construction and rehabilitation and higher education facilities; (iii) $4.1 billion for levee repair, flood control and related projects, and (iv) $2.9 billion for various housing programs. In addition, there was a constitutional amendment on the ballot to limit future diversions of sales taxes on gasoline from transportation purposes (Proposition 42). All four of these measures were approved by the voters at the November 7, 2006 election, at which time the Governor was also re-elected to a second term in office.</R>

<R>In the November 2008 general election, California voters approved new general obligation bond measures authorizing $9.95 billion for a high-speed train service linking Southern California and the San Francisco Bay Area, $980 million for construction and renovation of children's hospitals and $900 million for mortgage loans to California veterans. The creation of a Strategic Growth Council will be proposed in the next statewide election following the November 2008 general election to coordinate activities and investment of funds in State-owned and State-funded infrastructure. Legislation enacted on November 4, 2009 authorizes submission to the voters at the statewide election on November 2, 2010 of a ballot measure to approve the issuance of $11.14 billion in general obligation bonds for a wide variety of purposes relating to the improvement of California's water supply systems, drought relief, and groundwater protection. Additional bond measures may be included on the November 2, 2010 election ballot, but there are no bond measures on the June 8, 2010 ballot.</R>

<R>Litigation. The State is a party to numerous legal proceedings, many of which normally occur in government operations. In addition, the State is involved in certain other legal proceedings (described in the State's recent financial statements) that, if decided against the State, might require the State to make significant future expenditures or substantially impair future revenue sources. Because of the prospective nature of these proceedings, it is not presently possible to predict the outcome of such litigation, estimate the potential impact on the ability of the State to pay debt service costs on its obligations, or determine what impact, if any, such proceedings may have on a fund's investments.</R>

<R>Municipal Downgrades and Bankruptcies. Municipal bonds may be more susceptible to being downgraded, defaulting, and filing for and entering into bankruptcy during recessions or similar periods of economic stress. Factors contributing to the economic stress on municipalities may include lower property tax collections as a result of lower home values, lower sales tax revenue as a result of consumers cutting back from spending, and lower income tax revenue as a result of a high unemployment rate. In addition, as certain municipal obligations may be secured or guaranteed by banks and other institutions, the risk to a fund could increase if the banking or financial sector suffers an economic downturn and/or if the credit ratings of the institutions issuing the guarantee are downgraded or at risk of being downgraded by a national rating organization. Such a downward revision or risk of being downgraded may have an adverse effect on the market prices of the bonds and thus the value of a fund's investments. Further, an insolvent municipality may file for bankruptcy. For example, Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a financially distressed municipality protection from its creditors while it develops and negotiates a plan for reorganizing its debts. "Municipality" is defined broadly by the Bankruptcy Code as a "political subdivision or public agency or instrumentality of a state" and may include various issuers of securities in which the fund invests. The reorganization of a municipality's debts may be accomplished by extending debt maturities, reducing the amount of principal or interest, refinancing the debt or other measures which may significantly affect the rights of creditors and the value of the securities issued by the municipality and the value of a fund's investments. </R>

<R>In addition, many municipal issuers recently either have been unable to issue bonds or access the market to sell their issues or, if able to access the market, have issued bonds at much higher rates. Should the State or municipalities fail to sell bonds when and at the rates projected, the State could experience significantly increased costs in the General Fund and a weakened overall cash position in the current fiscal year.</R>

<R>Bond Ratings. As of March 22, 2010, the State's general obligation bonds were rated Baa1, A- and BBB by Moody's®, Standard & Poor's® Rating Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P®) and Fitch Inc. (Fitch), respectively, with each rating representing a downgrade since July 2009. In January, 2010, S&P lowered the State's general obligation bond offering rating to A- from A, indicating that the State's fiscal imbalance and impending recurrence of a cash deficiency as factors in its decision. In July 2009, Fitch lowered the State's general obligation bond rating from A- to BBB citing the State's continued inability to achieve timely agreement on budgetary and cash flow solutions to its severe financial crisis. In the same month, Moody's lowered the State's general obligation bond rating to Baa1 from A2, citing the State's use of IOUs for non-priority payments, the deadlock on the budget gap, and the risk to priority payments.</R>

<R>Each such rating reflects only the views of the respective rating agency and an explanation of the significance of such rating may be obtained from such rating agency. There is no assurance that such ratings will continue for any given period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by such rating agency if in the judgment of such rating agency circumstances so warrant. Lower credit ratings make it more expensive for the State to raise revenue, and in some cases, could prevent the State from issuing general obligation bonds in the quantity otherwise desired. A downward revision or withdrawal of any such rating may have an adverse effect on the marketability and market prices of the bonds held by a fund.</R>

<R>Other Considerations. The repayment of industrial development securities or single family mortgage revenue bonds secured by real property may be affected by California laws limiting foreclosure rights of creditors. Under California law, mortgage loans secured by single family homes can be prepaid at any time without penalty, except in the first five years of the loan, and subject to limits on the size of the penalty. Such prepayments may affect the ability of the issuer of single family mortgage bonds to repay the bonds. Securities backed by health care and hospital revenues may be affected by changes in State regulations governing cost reimbursements to health care providers under Medi-Cal (the State's Medicaid program), including risks related to the policy of awarding exclusive contracts to certain hospitals.</R>

<R>Limitations on ad valorem property taxes may particularly affect "tax allocation" bonds issued by California redevelopment agencies. Such bonds are secured solely by the increase in assessed valuation of a redevelopment project area after the start of redevelopment activity. In the event that assessed values in the redevelopment project decline (e.g., because of a major natural disaster such as an earthquake), the tax increment revenue may be insufficient to make principal and interest payments on these bonds. Both Moody's and S&P suspended ratings on California tax allocation bonds after the enactment of Articles XIIIA and XIIIB, and only resumed such ratings on a selective basis.</R>

<R>Proposition 87, approved by California voters in 1988, requires that all revenues produced by a tax rate increase go directly to the taxing entity which increased such tax rate to repay that entity's general obligation indebtedness. As a result, redevelopment agencies (which, typically, are the issuers of tax allocation securities) no longer receive an increase in tax increment when taxes on property in the project area are increased to repay voter-approved bonded indebtedness.</R>

<R>The effect of these various constitutional and statutory changes upon the ability of California municipal securities issuers to pay interest and principal on their obligations remains unclear. Furthermore, other measures affecting the taxing or spending authority of California or its political subdivisions may be approved or enacted in the future. Legislation has been or may be introduced which would modify existing taxes or other revenue-raising measures or which either would further limit or, alternatively, would increase the abilities of State and local governments to impose new taxes or increase existing taxes. It is not possible, at present, to predict the extent to which any such legislation will be enacted. Nor is it possible, at present, to determine the impact of any such legislation on securities held in a fund, future allocations of State revenues to local governments or the abilities of State or local governments to pay the interest on, or repay the principal of, such securities.</R>

<R>Substantially all of California is within an active geologic region subject to major seismic activity. Northern California in 1989 and Southern California in 1994 experienced major earthquakes causing billions of dollars in damages. The federal government provided more than $13 billion in aid for both earthquakes, and neither event has had any long-term negative economic impact. Any obligation in a fund could be affected by an interruption of revenues because of damaged facilities, or, consequently, income tax deductions for casualty losses or property tax assessment reductions due to earthquakes. Compensatory financial assistance could be constrained by the inability of (i) an issuer to have obtained earthquake insurance coverage rates; (ii) an insurer to perform on its contracts of insurance in the event of widespread losses; or (iii) the federal or State government to appropriate sufficient funds within their respective budget limitations.</R>

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING PUERTO RICO

<R>The following section provides only a summary of (and does not purport to explain, predict, or fully describe) the complex factors, including both economic and political conditions, affecting the financial situation in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (as used in this section, the "Commonwealth" or "Puerto Rico") and is based on information in publicly available documents. This information has not been independently verified. The information provided below is subject to change rapidly, substantially, and without notice, and the inclusion of such information herein shall not under any circumstances create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Commonwealth or its issuers since the date of its preparation. Any such change(s) may adversely affect the Commonwealth's and applicable issuer's cash flows, expenditures, or revenues, or otherwise negatively impact the current or projected Commonwealth financial situation, which in turn could hamper fund performance.</R>

<R>Further, the marketability, valuation or liquidity of Commonwealth municipal securities may be negatively affected in the event that Commonwealth localities or authorities default on their debt obligations or other market events arise, which in turn may negatively affect fund performance, sometimes substantially. Economic and other conditions within the Commonwealth may affect the credit risk of those localities or authorities to the extent that such localities and authorities are reliant upon Commonwealth appropriations. In addition, the difficulties encountered by bond insurers in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis and other credit and overall market events may continue to impact municipal securities negatively, and the full effects of these events remain uncertain.</R>

Relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States. Puerto Rico's constitutional status is that of a territory of the United States (U.S.), and, pursuant to the territorial clause of the U.S. Constitution, the ultimate source of power over Puerto Rico is the U.S. Congress. The Commonwealth exercises virtually the same control over its internal affairs as do each of the 50 U.S. states over their own affairs. The Commonwealth differs from the states, however, in its relationship with the U.S. federal government. The people of Puerto Rico are citizens of the U.S. but do not vote in U.S. national elections. They are represented in Congress by a Resident Commissioner that has a voice in the House of Representatives but no vote (except in House committees and sub-committees to which he belongs). Most U.S. federal taxes, except those such as Social Security taxes, are not levied in Puerto Rico. No U.S. federal income tax is collected from Puerto Rico residents on income earned in Puerto Rico, except for certain federal employees who are subject to taxes on their salaries. Income earned by Puerto Rico residents from sources outside of Puerto Rico, however, is subject to federal income tax.

The Economy of Puerto Rico. The economy of Puerto Rico is closely linked to the U.S. economy, as most of the external factors that affect the Puerto Rico economy (other than oil prices) are determined by the policies and performance of the U.S. economy. These external factors include exports, direct investment, the amount of federal transfer payments, the level of interest rates, the rate of inflation, and tourist expenditures.

The Commonwealth in the past has established policies and programs directed principally at developing the manufacturing sector and expanding and modernizing the Commonwealth's infrastructure. Domestic and foreign investments have historically been stimulated by selective tax exemptions, development loans, and other financial and tax incentives. Infrastructure expansion and modernization have been to a large extent financed by bonds and notes issued by the Commonwealth, its public corporations, and municipalities. Economic progress has been aided by significant increases in the levels of education and occupational skills of the population.

Puerto Rico's economy has experienced a considerable transformation during the past 65 years, shifting from an agriculture economy to an industrial one. Virtually every sector of the economy participated in this expansion. Factors contributing to this expansion include government-sponsored economic development programs, increases in the level of federal transfer payments, and the relatively low cost of borrowing. In some years, these factors were aided by a significant rise in construction investment driven by infrastructure projects, private investment, primarily in housing, and relatively low oil prices. Nevertheless, the significant oil price increases during the past few years, the continuous contraction of the manufacturing sector, and the budgetary pressures on government finances triggered a general contraction in the economy.

The Commonwealth's economy entered a recession beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006. For fiscal years 2007 and 2008, the real gross national product (GNP) contracted by 1.9% and 2.5%, respectively. This contraction continued into fiscal year 2009, for which the Puerto Rico Planning Board (the Planning Board) expected a reduction of 3.4% in real GNP. While the trend was expected to continue in fiscal year 2010, the Planning Board announced on April 29, 2009, that the expected positive impact of certain U.S. federal and local economic stimulus measures should outweigh the expected negative impact of the Commonwealth's Fiscal Stabilization Plan (Fiscal Stabilization Plan) and revised its projections for fiscal year 2010 to reflect an increase of 0.1% in real GNP.

Puerto Rico has a diversified economy. Manufacturing and services are among its principal sectors. The manufacturing sector has undergone fundamental changes over the years as a result of increased emphasis on higher-wage, high-technology industries, such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, computers, microprocessors, professional and scientific instruments, and certain high technology machinery and equipment. Manufacturing employment had been declining during the past decade, and the decline accelerated during fiscal years 2002 and 2003, falling 10.6% and 4.8%, respectively. Thereafter, manufacturing employment seemed to stabilize around 118,000 jobs, but the acceleration in job losses reappeared in fiscal year 2006 with the sector experiencing another significant drop of 4.0%. For fiscal years 2007 and 2008, manufacturing employment decreased by 4.2% and 3.4%, respectively. For the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, the sector lost an average of 5,600 jobs, or 5.3% compared to the same period of the previous year. Given that this sector used to pay the highest wages, on average, in Puerto Rico, its general downturn has represented a major difficulty for restoring growth for the whole economy. There are several reasons that explain this sector's job shrinkage: the end of the phase-out of Section 936 of the Internal Revenue Code, the net loss of patents on certain pharmaceutical products, the escalation of manufacturing production costs (particularly labor and electricity), the increased use of job outsourcing, and, the effects of the global economic decline. Puerto Rico's manufacturing sector is also facing increased international competition.

The service sector, which includes finance, insurance, real estate, wholesale and retail trade, transportation, communications and public utilities, and other services, also plays a major role in the Commonwealth's economy. The sector has expanded in terms of both income and employment over the past decade. During the period between fiscal years 2004 and 2008, the gross domestic product in this sector, in nominal terms, increased at an average annual rate of 5.0%, while payroll employment in this sector increased at an average annual rate of 0.8%. In the Puerto Rico labor market, self-employment, which is not accounted for in the Payroll Survey, represents approximately 15% of total employment. Most of the self-employment is concentrated in the service and construction sectors. The development of the service sector has been positively affected by demand generated by other sectors of the economy, such as manufacturing and construction. The service sector ranks second to manufacturing in its contribution to gross domestic product, and it is the sector with the greatest employment. For the first nine months of fiscal year 2009, the average service-sector employment was 546,108, a decrease of 2.6% compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year.

One factor that has promoted the development of the manufacturing and service sectors in Puerto Rico is the various local and federal tax incentives available, particularly those under Puerto Rico's Industrial Incentives Program.

General Risks. Many complex political, social, and economic factors influence the Commonwealth's economy and finances. Such factors may affect the Commonwealth's budget unpredictably from year to year. Such factors include, but are not limited to: (i) developments with respect to the national economy as a whole; (ii) developments with respect to the manufacturing and service sectors of the economy; (iii) developments in the world economy, and in particular commodity prices such as oil; (iv) U.S. fiscal and economic policies, including fiscal stimulus efforts in general and the amount of federal aid to the Commonwealth; (v) and the extent to which the federal stimulus legislation, and in particular the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), as enacted and implemented, provides less federal aid to the Commonwealth than anticipated in the Commonwealth's budget, and the resulting need to implement other revenue enhancements or expenditure reductions.

These factors are continually changing, and no assurances can be given with respect to how these factors or other factors will materialize in the future or what impact they will have on the Commonwealth's fiscal and economic condition. Such factors could have an adverse impact on the Commonwealth budget in the current year and could result in declines, possibly severe, in the value of the Commonwealth's and municipal issuers' outstanding obligations, increases in their future borrowing costs, and impairment of their ability to pay debt service on their obligations.

<R>Recent Events in the Municipal Bond Market. A significant number of auction rate municipal bonds have failed to attract buyers, resulting in "failed auctions" and a resetting of the periodic rates to rates in excess of those which would otherwise prevail in the short-term market. The failed auctions have affected municipal issuers throughout the U.S. and its territories and reflect concerns relating to bond insurers that have insured those bonds as well as changes in the operation of the auction rate itself. As an outcome of these failed auctions, governmental issuers are experiencing significantly higher debt service costs on auction rate bonds and bondholders are experiencing less liquidity than had been anticipated. The duration of the disruption in the auction rate securities market cannot be predicted at this time. In addition, the value of municipal securities may be difficult to measure in the current or a future market environment, as current valuation, significantly affected by external forces, may not reflect the intrinsic, underlying value of Commonwealth municipal securities. These events may adversely impact a fund's NAV.</R>

Fiscal Year 2007. The Planning Board's reports on the performance of the Puerto Rico economy during fiscal year 2007 indicate that the real GNP fell by 1.9%. Nominal GNP was $58.6 billion ($44.2 billion in 2000 prices), compared with $56.7 billion in fiscal year 2006 ($45.0 billion in 2000 prices). This represents an increase in nominal (GNP) of 3.2%. Aggregate personal income was $52.3 billion in fiscal year 2007 ($43.3 billion in 2000 prices), as compared to $50.8 billion in fiscal year 2006 ($43.4 billion in 2000 prices), and personal income per capita was $13,269 in fiscal year 2007 ($11,012 in 2000 prices), as compared to $12,944 in fiscal year 2006 ($11,052 in 2000 prices). (Note: Different price deflators are used for GNP and personal income statistics. The year 2000 is used as a basis for comparison because that is the year used by the U.S. Department of Commerce.)

Total employment for fiscal year 2007 averaged 1,262,900, an increase of 0.8% compared to 1,253,400 for fiscal year 2006. The driving force behind total employment was self-employment. The unemployment rate for fiscal year 2007 was 10.4%, a decrease from 11.7% for fiscal year 2006.

Fiscal Year 2008. The Planning Board's preliminary reports on the performance of the Puerto Rico economy for fiscal year 2008 indicate that real (GNP) decreased 2.5% (3.8% in current dollars) over fiscal year 2007. Nominal (GNP) was $60.8 billion in fiscal year 2008 ($43.0 billion in 2000 prices), compared to $58.6 billion in fiscal year 2007 ($44.2 billion in 2000 prices). Aggregate personal income increased from $52.3 billion in fiscal year 2007 ($43.4 billion in 2000 prices) to $56.2 billion in fiscal year 2008 ($44.8 billion in 2000 prices), and personal income per capita increased from $13,269 in fiscal year 2007 ($11,012 in 2000 prices) to $14,237 in fiscal year 2008 ($11,341 in 2000 prices). The increase in personal income in fiscal year 2008 was due in part to the tax rebate program implemented during such year.

Total employment for fiscal year 2008 averaged 1,217,500, a decrease of 3.6% compared to 1,262,900 for fiscal year 2007. At the same time, the unemployment rate for fiscal year 2008 was 11.0%, an increase from 10.4% for fiscal year 2007.

Among the variables contributing to the decrease in (GNP) were the continuous contraction of the manufacturing and construction sectors, as well as the current contraction of U.S. economic activity. Furthermore, the decline in Puerto Rico's GNP was not offset by the federal tax rebates due to the high levels of oil prices during fiscal year 2008. The persistent high price of oil and its derivatives (such as gasoline) during that period served to reduce the income available for other purchases and thereby negatively affected domestic demand. Due to the Commonwealth's dependence on oil for power generation and gasoline (in spite of its recent improvements in power-production diversification), the high level of oil prices accounted for an increased outflow of local income in fiscal year 2008. The current difficulties associated with the financial crisis resulted in lower short-term interest rates, but this did not translate into an improvement in the construction sector.

Forecast for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010. The Planning Board's GNP forecast for fiscal year 2009, released in February of the same year, projected a decline of 3.4% in constant dollars, or an increase of 1.5% in current dollars. Personal income is expected to decline by 1.5% in real terms, or to increase by 2.3% in nominal terms. While a prolongation of the economic contraction through fiscal year 2010 had been expected, the Planning Board announced on April 29, 2009 that the expected positive impact of the U.S. federal and local economic stimulus measures discussed below should outweigh the expected negative impact of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan also described below, leading it to adjust its projections for fiscal year 2010.

The Planning Board projected a slight increase in GNP of 0.1% in constant dollars or 3.4% in current dollars. The major factors affecting the economy at this point are, among others, the current contraction of U.S. economic activity; the difficulties of the U.S. and local financial systems, which affect the local economy directly; the increase in federal transfers associated to the economic stimulus enacted by the U.S. government; and the local difficulties associated with the Commonwealth's prolonged fiscal crisis, including the cost reduction initiatives to be implemented as part of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan discussed below.

The number of persons employed in Puerto Rico during the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 (from July 2008 to March 2009), averaged 1,179,900, a decrease of 3.1% from the same period of the previous year. Moreover, for the first nine months of the current fiscal year, the unemployment rate was 13.0%, an increase from 11.0% for the first nine months of fiscal year 2008.

Revised Economic Data for Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010. In August 2009, the Planning Board revised its GNP forecast for fiscal year 2009 by projecting a base-case scenario decline of 4.8% in constant dollars, a further decline of 1.4% from the projection released in February 2009. The Planning Board, however, made an upward revision to its GNP forecast for fiscal year 2010 by projecting an increase of 0.7% in constant dollars. The Planning Board's revised forecast for fiscal year 2010 takes into account the estimated effect on the Puerto Rico economy of a multi-year Fiscal Stabilization Plan and of the activity expected to be generated by $1.73 billion from ARRA and $280.3 million from the Puerto Rico government's local stimulus package. The revised forecast also considers the effect on the Puerto Rico economy of general global economic conditions, the U.S. economy, the volatility of oil prices, interest rates and the behavior of local exports, including expenditures by visitors.

Based upon 2009 forecasts, Puerto Rico expects to receive approximately $6 billion in stimulus funds from ARRA, of which approximately $3.3 billion will be used to provide consumer and tax payer relief. As of August 2009, the Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, which is responsible for the administration of ARRA in Puerto Rico, reported that approximately $609 million in ARRA funds for use in health, housing, and education related projects, among others, had been disbursed.

The government has also begun disbursing funds under the local stimulus program. Most municipalities have received disbursements earmarked to pay outstanding debts and fund local projects. The government has also disbursed funds allocated towards job training programs, a strategic water distribution project in a southern municipality and the revamping of the Puerto Rico permits system.

Total employment for fiscal year 2009 averaged 1,168,200, a decrease of 4.1% from the previous fiscal year. The unemployment rate for fiscal year 2009 was 13.4%, an increase from 11% for fiscal year 2008. For the month of October 2009, the unemployment rate was 15.7%, compared with 10.2 % for the U.S. as a whole.

Results for Fiscal Year 2009. Total preliminary Puerto Rico General Fund (General Fund) revenues for fiscal year 2009 are $7.76 billion, representing a decrease of $598.6 million, or 7.2%, from preliminary fiscal year 2008 revenues. The major changes from fiscal year 2008 were: (i) decreases in income taxes from individuals of $145.4 million and in corporate income taxes of $201.2 million; (ii) a decrease of $51.9 million in motor vehicle excise taxes; (iii) a decrease of $60.1 million in miscellaneous non-tax revenues; and (iv) a decrease of $16.1 million in sales and use tax revenues. In fiscal year 2008, General Fund revenues also included $145 million of nonrecurring revenues from the sale of certain properties owned by the Commonwealth. The continued decline in General Fund tax revenues reflects primarily the impact of the ongoing economic recession and the effect of tax benefits and incentives granted to certain individual and corporate taxpayers pursuant to previous legislation designed to stimulate economic development.

Total preliminary General Fund revenues for fiscal year 2009 of $7.76 billion exceeded the revised estimate, made in February 2009 of $7.60 billion by approximately $160 million, or 2.1%. The major changes from the revised estimate for fiscal year 2009 were: (i) an increase of $190.4 million in income taxes withheld from non-residents pursuant to certain closing agreements with the Department of the Treasury; and (ii) an increase of $59 million in income taxes from individuals.

Approved Budget for Fiscal Year 2010. On July 1, 2009, the Commonwealth's governor signed a General Fund budget for fiscal year 2010 of $7.670 billion. The approved budget is approximately 19% lower than the $9.48 billion budget approved for fiscal year 2009. The approved budget is lower than the preliminary General Fund net revenues for fiscal year 2009 by $90 million, or 1.2%, and creates a payment schedule for certain Commonwealth debts or other obligations, such as borrowings from Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (GDB) that did not have a dedicated source of repayment, and accounts payable to public corporations. The General Fund budget excludes a $2.5 billion Puerto Rico Stabilization Fund (Stabilization Fund) that will facilitate the orderly implementation of certain expense reduction measures adopted by the Government of the Commonwealth pursuant to Act No. 7 of March 9, 2009, (Act No. 7). The Stabilization Fund will provide (i) $1 billion to finance the cost of transitioning public employees to non-governmental sectors and providing vouchers for re-training, self-employment, relocation and salary subsidy alternatives, and (ii) $1.5 billion to cover payroll and operating expenses that are expected to be reduced through fiscal year 2010, but whose savings will not be realized in such fiscal year. The Stabilization Fund will be funded with proceeds from the bonds issued by the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation ("COFINA" by its Spanish-language acronym).

Amendments to Act No. 7. The Commonwealth's Legislative Assembly approved a series of amendments to Act No. 7, which declared a state of fiscal emergency in Puerto Rico and adopted a comprehensive plan for fiscal and economic stabilization. The amendments do not alter the forecast of General Fund revenues for fiscal year 2010, nor do they affect the adoption of on-going expense reduction measures. Act No. 7 was amended to, among other things: (i) restore the tax-exemption enjoyed by certain securities that were affected by recent changes under the Alternative Minimum Tax; and (ii) introduce, with certain exceptions, a total cap of $40 million for granting tax credits related to Act No. 212 of 2002 (Urban Renewal projects) and establish specific limitations on the claim of such credits. These amendments also re-introduced the Sales and Use Tax Resale Exemption Certificate to retailers with a proven sales volume higher than $500,000. Retailers with a lower sales volume may enjoy the exemption subject to approval from the Secretary. The Secretary retains the right to revoke any Exemption Certificate for the period of a year if a retailer fails to comply with filing requirements related to the Sales and Use Tax. Finally, the amendments extended the temporary Commonwealth property tax to commercial real estate. The applicable Commonwealth property tax will be 0.591%. This temporary tax will be levied for three years or until an aggregated amount of $690 million is collected from this tax, whichever event occurs first.

On August 5, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico denied the preliminary injunction requested by a group of government employees and labor organizations in a complaint filed on April 13, 2009, challenging the constitutionality of Act No. 7 and seeking to enjoin its enforcement. The District Court's decision allows the Government to continue with the implementation of Act No. 7. The Government has moved to dismiss the complaint and will continue to vigorously defend the constitutionality of Act No. 7.

Fiscal Stabilization Plan. The Commonwealth's current administration, which commenced on January 2, 2009, and controls the Executive and Legislative branches of government, has developed and commenced implementing a multi-year Fiscal Stabilization and Economic Reconstruction Plan that seeks to achieve fiscal balance and restore economic growth. The Fiscal Stabilization and Economic Reconstruction Plan is composed of two main elements: the Fiscal Stabilization Plan and the Economic Reconstruction Plan. The Fiscal Stabilization Plan seeks to achieve budgetary balance on or before fiscal year 2013, while addressing expected fiscal deficits in the intervening years through the implementation of a number of initiatives, including the following: (i) a $2 billion operating expense-reduction plan during fiscal year 2010, through government reorganization and reduction of operating expenses, including payroll which is the main component of government expenditures; (ii) a combination of temporary and permanent tax increases, coupled with additional tax enforcement measures; and (iii) a bond issuance program through COFINA. Before the temporary measures expire in 2013, the administration intends to design and adopt a comprehensive reform of the tax system and a long-term economic development plan to complement the economic reconstruction and supplemental stimulus initiatives described below. The proceeds expected to be obtained from the COFINA bond issuance program will be used to repay existing government debt (including debts with the GDB), finance operating expenses of the Commonwealth for fiscal years 2009 through 2011 (and for fiscal year 2012, to the extent included in the government's annual budget for such fiscal year), including costs related to the implementation of a workforce reduction plan, the funding of an economic stimulus plan, as described below, and for other purposes to address the fiscal imbalance while the Fiscal Stabilization Plan is being implemented. The Fiscal Stabilization Plan seeks to safeguard the investment grade ratings of the Commonwealth's general obligation debt and lay the foundation for sustainable economic growth. Legislation has already been enacted authorizing the implementation of all the measures in the Fiscal Stabilization Plan and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has certified projected savings of $237 million for fiscal year 2010 from implemented measures to date.

As discussed above, in order to achieve fiscal balance, the Fiscal Stabilization Plan established a government-wide operating expense-reduction program aimed at reducing annual payroll and other operating expenses by $2 billion by the end of fiscal year 2010. The Fiscal Board estimates that the annual savings from all cost reduction measures implemented or identified by the Commonwealth as of September 30, 2009, will amount to approximately $1.2 billion, which is approximately 60% of the $2 billion target. The Fiscal Board continues to seek and implement various initiatives to obtain additional savings necessary in order to achieve the $2 billion target. The additional savings are expected to come from both cost reduction and revenue generating initiatives, which include, among others, improvements in government procurement processes, reorganization and increased fiscal oversight of government agencies and improvements in tax collection and enforcement measures.

Economic Reconstruction Plan

The Commonwealth's current administration has also developed and commenced implementing a short-term economic reconstruction plan that seeks to stimulate growth in the short-term and lay the foundation for long-term economic development. The cornerstone of this plan is the implementation of U.S. federal and local economic stimulus programs. Puerto Rico will benefit from ARRA enacted by the U.S. government to stimulate the U.S. economy in the wake of the global economic downturn. Puerto Rico expects to receive approximately $5.0 billion from ARRA during the next two fiscal years, which includes tax relief, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, among other measures. The administration will seek to complement the U.S. federal stimulus with additional short- and medium-term supplemental stimulus measures seeking to address specific local challenges and providing investment in strategic areas. These measures include a local $500 million economic stimulus plan to supplement the federal plan. In addition, to further stimulate economic development and cope with the fiscal crisis, the administration is in the process of establishing a legal framework to authorize and promote the use of public-private partnerships to finance and develop infrastructure projects and operate and manage certain public assets.

Economic Development Program. The Department of Economic Development and Commerce (DEDC), in coordination with other government agencies, has been in the process of formulating and implementing a series of economic development initiatives with the goal of laying the groundwork for sustainable economic growth. These initiatives are centered on the dual mission of fostering multi-sector growth while reducing costs and barriers to business and investment, and are a medium-to-long-term counterpart to the Economic Reconstruction Plan and the Supplemental Stimulus Plan described above. The economic development initiatives are aimed at improving Puerto Rico's overall global relevance, competitiveness, and business environment and seek to increase private-sector capital formation and participation in the Puerto Rico economy. The administration will emphasize three main initiatives to enhance Puerto Rico's competitive position: (i) overhauling the permitting process; (ii) reforming the labor market; and (iii) reducing energy costs.

Puerto Rico Tax Incentives. Corporations operating in Puerto Rico (other than corporations organized in the U.S. with a local branch) and individuals residing in Puerto Rico generally are not subject to federal income taxes on income derived in Puerto Rico.

The Commonwealth has enacted legislation providing tax exemptions and tax incentives for businesses operating within certain sectors of the economy. Tax incentives laws have existed in Puerto Rico for over 50 years. The most recent tax incentives act, the Economic Incentives Act enacted on May 28, 2008, covers companies dedicated to manufacturing and the export of services. All eligible businesses operating under previous tax incentives laws may apply for the benefits provided by the Economic Incentives Act.

The Economic Incentives Act streamlines the process for obtaining tax incentives and provides recipients with certainty as to the amount of benefits they will receive over time. The Economic Incentives Act expands the definition of manufacturing to include cluster and supply chain concepts, addresses issues of cost competitiveness, and simplifies the applicable rules. The tax structure established by the Economic Incentives Act generally has a 4% income tax rate and a 12% withholding tax rate for royalties. An alternative structure has an 8% income tax rate and a 2% withholding tax on royalties. For existing businesses with tax rates between 2% and 4%, the Secretary of the DEDC has the discretion to grant the same tax benefits if doing so is considered to be in the best interests of Puerto Rico's economy. Income tax rates may be reduced by an additional 0.5% for projects located in low- or mid-economic development areas. Additional exceptions to the general tax structure exist for pioneering activities, local firms and small businesses. Pioneering activities may have a 1% income tax rate, or no income taxes if the research and development activity is located completely within Puerto Rico. Local firms may enjoy a tax rate as low as 3%, and for small- and medium-sized businesses the tax rate may be as low as 1%, provided such activities are eligible for certain credits provided by the Economic Incentives Act.

A variety of tax credits are available under the Economic Incentives Act, including: for the purchase of products manufactured in Puerto Rico; for job creation; for investment in research and development; for investment in energy-generation equipment; to reduce the cost of energy; to transfer technology; and for investors who acquire exempt operations in the process of shutting down. There are also investment credits for projects classified as strategic projects. Some of these credits can be carried forward and others can be sold.

Public Sector Debt

The Constitution of Puerto Rico limits the amount of general obligation debt that the Commonwealth can issue. Section 2 of Article VI of the Constitution of the Commonwealth provides that direct obligations of the Commonwealth evidenced by full faith and credit bonds or notes shall not be issued if the amount of the principal of and interest on such bonds and notes and on all such bonds and notes theretofore issued that is payable in any fiscal year, together with any amount paid by the Commonwealth in the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year of such proposed issuance on account of bonds or notes guaranteed by the Commonwealth, exceed 15% of the average annual revenues raised under the provisions of Commonwealth legislation and deposited into the Treasury in the two fiscal years preceding the fiscal year of such proposed issuance. Section 2 of Article VI does not limit the amount of debt that the Commonwealth may guarantee so long as the 15% limitation is not exceeded through payments by the Commonwealth on such guaranteed debt. Annual debt service payments on bonds guaranteed by the Commonwealth are not included in the calculation of the 15% debt limitation. In the event any of the public corporations issuers of guaranteed bonds are unable to make any portion of the future debt service payments on their guaranteed bonds, the Commonwealth would be required to make such payments under its guarantee from the General Fund, and such debt service would be included in the calculation of the 15% debt limitation. The Commonwealth's policy has been to be to maintain the level of such debt below the constitutional limitation. Debt of municipalities, other than bond anticipation notes, is supported by real and personal property taxes and municipal license taxes. Debt of public corporations, other than bond anticipation notes, is generally supported by the revenues of such corporations from rates charged for services or products.

Commonwealth Guaranteed Debt. As of December 31, 2008, $3.05 billion of Commonwealth guaranteed bonds of the Public Buildings Authority were outstanding. Maximum annual debt service on these bonds is $236.2 million in fiscal year 2011, with their final maturity being July 1, 2037. No payments under the Commonwealth guaranty have been required to date for these bonds.

As of December 31, 2008, $267 million of Commonwealth guaranteed bonds of GDB were outstanding. No payments under the Commonwealth guaranty have been required for these bonds. As of December 31, 2008, GDB held approximately $154.8 million of the Port of the Americas Authority's outstanding bonds, which are guaranteed by the Commonwealth. The Port of the Americas Authority is authorized to issue and GDB is authorized to purchase its bonds guaranteed by the Commonwealth in a maximum aggregate principal amount of $250 million. The proceeds from these bonds will be used to continue the development of the Port of the Americas. No payments under the Commonwealth guaranty have been required for these bonds.

As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of obligations of the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA) guaranteed by the Commonwealth was $902.0 million. This amount consisted of $284.7 million in revenue bonds sold to the public, $312.4 million in bonds issued to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, and $304.9 million of loans by the State Revolving (Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water Act) Funds for the benefit of PRASA. From January 1997 through fiscal year 2005, the Commonwealth made debt service payments under its guaranty. Beginning with the debt service payment due January 1, 2006, the Commonwealth stopped making guarantee payments on these obligations and PRASA resumed making payments on this debt. In the event PRASA is unable to make any portion of the future debt service payments on its guaranteed obligations, the Commonwealth would be required to make such payments from the General Fund under its guarantee.

Retirement Systems

Public employees of the Commonwealth and its instrumentalities are covered by five retirement systems: the Employees Retirement System, the Puerto Rico System of Annuities and Pensions for Teachers (the Teachers Retirement System), the Commonwealth Judiciary Retirement System (the Judiciary Retirement System), the Retirement System of the University of Puerto Rico (the University Retirement System), and the Employees Retirement System of Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (the Electric Power Authority Retirement System).

The University Retirement System and the Electric Power Authority Retirement System apply to employees of the University of Puerto Rico and Electric Power Authority, respectively. The Commonwealth is not required to contribute directly to those two systems, although a large portion of University revenues is derived from legislative appropriations.

As of June 30, 2008, the total numbers of participants, including active participants and retirees, in the other three systems were as follows: Employees Retirement System, 278,732; Teachers Retirement System, 77,840; and Judiciary Retirement System, 695. The three systems are financed by contributions made by employers (the Commonwealth, public corporations, and municipalities) and employees, and investment income. The central government is responsible for approximately 64% of total employer contributions to the Employees Retirement System and for 100% and 99% of total employer contributions to the Judiciary and Teachers Retirement Systems, respectively.

According to the most recent independent actuarial valuation of the Employees Retirement System, as of June 30, 2007, the preliminary figures for actuarial accrued liability was $16.770 billion and the actuarial value of assets was $2.892 billion, representing a funding ratio of 17.2% and the resulting unfunded actuarial accrued liability was $13.878 billion. . The actuarial valuation assumed an investment return of 8.5% per year and a salary increase of 5% per year. During fiscal year 2009, the Employees Retirement System had a cash shortfall of approximately $385 million. This cash shortfall was covered from the sale of certain investments. The Employees Retirement System's projected cash flow shortfall for fiscal year 2010 is approximately $400 million, which is expected to be covered from resources available to the Employees Retirement System, including the sale of certain investments. This negative trend is expected to continue partly due to possible future increases in the cost of living adjustments, changes in demographics of retirees and beneficiaries, and possible higher pension payments due to higher salaries of future retirees. The Employees Retirement System's cash flow shortfall for fiscal year 2010 could also be affected by the implementation of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan. The Employees Retirement System continues to evaluate measures to improve the System's cash flow and funding ratio, as well as the potential impact of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan. The Employees Retirement System's disbursements of benefits during fiscal years 2004 through 2007 exceeded contributions and investment income for those years. The cash shortfall for fiscal year 2004 was covered with a loan received from the Department of the Treasury. Balances owed to the Department of the Treasury and other pending working capital needs through fiscal year 2005 were refinanced through a repurchase agreement with a financial institution in an amount of $138 million collateralized with the assets of the Employees Retirement System. The cash shortfall for fiscal year 2006 was approximately $70 million. This shortfall was covered with a line of credit provided by a private financial institution and collateralized with the assets of the Employees Retirement System. There was no cash shortfall for fiscal year 2007 on account of the receipt of the proceeds from the sale of the Puerto Rico Telephone Company stock that the Puerto Rico Telephone Authority held for the benefit of the Trust. Also with these proceeds the Employees Retirement System paid off the balances of the 2005 repurchase agreement and the 2006 line of credit used to cover the respective year's cash shortfalls. For fiscal year 2008, the Employees Retirement System experienced a positive cash flow due to various nonrecurring sources of income and a series of financings to increase the Employees Retirement System's funding ratio and reduce its unfunded pension benefit obligation. The financings involved the issuance by the Employees Retirement System of debt secured by a pledge of future employer contributions over the next 50 years. All net cash generated by these financings was deposited into the Employees Retirement System trust and invested along with its other assets. As of June 30, 2008, the Employees Retirement System had issued three series totaling approximately $2.9 billion of its Senior Pension Funding Bonds.

According to the most recent actuarial valuation of the Teachers Retirement System submitted by a firm of independent consulting actuaries, as of June 30, 2007, the accrued actuarial liability was $7.756 billion and the value of its assets amounted to $3.163 billion, representing a funding ratio of 41%, and the resulting unfunded accrued liability was $4.593 billion. The actuarial valuation assumed an investment return of 8%, yearly salary increases of 3.5%, employee and employer contributions of 9% and 8.5%, respectively, an inflation rate of 2.5%, and a remaining amortization period of 30 years for the unfunded accrued liability. With respect to the Teachers Retirement System, the cash shortfalls for fiscal years 2006, 2007, and 2008 were $65 million, $40 million, and $75 million, respectively. Investments were liquidated to cover these shortfalls. For fiscal year 2009, the Teachers Retirement System expects to have a cash shortfall of approximately $67 million. Based on the Teachers Retirement System's estimates, it could have an $81 million cash flow deficit for fiscal year 2010. This negative trend is expected to continue given that Puerto Rico Teachers Retirement System is in a relatively mature stage. Based on the current statutory funding requirements, the annual benefit payments and administrative expenses paid by the Teachers Retirement System are significantly larger than the member and employer contributions made to the Teachers Retirement System. Thus, according to the 2007 actuarial valuation, investment income must be used to cover this negative cash flow. The Teachers Retirement System is seeking reimbursement from the Commonwealth's General Fund in the amount of $119 million for special benefits paid by the Teachers Retirement System to its beneficiaries through June 30, 2004, pursuant to special benefit laws enacted by the Legislative Assembly. The Teachers Retirement System's interpretation of these special benefit laws, to the effect that the Commonwealth is required to reimburse the Teachers Retirement System for such special benefits paid, is being disputed by the Office of Management and Budget. In March 2009 the Department of Education paid to the Teachers Retirement System the amount of $12 million as partial payment. The dispute for the pending amount of $107 million continues under inter-agency arbitration proceedings. The Employees Retirement System is also seeking reimbursement from the Commonwealth (in connection with other special benefits laws applicable to its beneficiaries) in the amount of $73.9 million, representing cumulative benefits paid to beneficiaries through June 30, 2005.

The market value of the investment portfolios (which excludes loans to plan members) held by the retirement plans has been materially adversely affected by the global decline in value of equity securities. This decline has had an adverse effect on the unfunded actuarial accrued liability of the retirement systems.

Litigation. The Commonwealth and its officers and employees are parties to numerous legal proceedings, many of which normally occur in government operations. In addition, the Commonwealth is involved in certain other legal proceedings (described in the Commonwealth's recent Official Statements) that, if decided against the Commonwealth, might require the Commonwealth to make significant future expenditures or substantially impair future revenue sources. Because of the prospective nature of these proceedings, it is not presently possible to predict the outcome of such litigation, estimate the potential impact on the ability of the Commonwealth to pay debt service costs on its obligations, or determine what impact, if any, such proceedings may have on a fund's investments.

Bond Ratings. As of December 24, 2009, the Commonwealth's General Obligation Bonds were rated Baa3 and BBB- by Moody's and S&P, respectively.

Each such rating reflects only the views of the respective rating agency and an explanation of the significance of such rating may be obtained from such rating agency. There is no assurance that such ratings will continue for any given period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by such rating agency if in the judgment of such rating agency circumstances so warrant. A downward revision or withdrawal of any such rating may have an adverse effect on the market prices of the bonds.

PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS

All orders for the purchase or sale of portfolio securities are placed on behalf of the fund by FMR pursuant to authority contained in the management contract. FMR may also be responsible for the placement of portfolio transactions for other investment companies and investment accounts for which it has or its affiliates have investment discretion. If FMR grants investment management authority to a sub-adviser (see the section entitled "Management Contract"), that sub-adviser is authorized to provide the services described in the sub-advisory agreement, and in accordance with the policies described in this section.

Purchases and sales of equity securities on a securities exchange or over-the-counter (OTC) are effected through brokers who receive compensation for their services. Generally, compensation relating to securities traded on foreign exchanges will be higher than compensation relating to securities traded on U.S. exchanges and may not be subject to negotiation. Compensation may also be paid in connection with principal transactions (in both OTC securities and securities listed on an exchange) and agency OTC transactions executed with an electronic communications network (ECN) or an alternative trading system. Equity securities may be purchased from underwriters at prices that include underwriting fees.

Purchases and sales of fixed-income securities are generally made with an issuer or a primary market-maker acting as principal. Although there is no stated brokerage commission paid by the fund for any fixed-income security, the price paid by the fund to an underwriter includes the disclosed underwriting fee and prices in secondary trades usually include an undisclosed dealer commission or markup reflecting the spread between the bid and ask prices of the fixed-income security.

The Trustees of the fund periodically review FMR's performance of its responsibilities in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund. The Trustees also review the compensation paid by the fund over representative periods of time to determine if it was reasonable in relation to the benefits to the fund.

The Selection of Brokers

In selecting brokers or dealers (including affiliates of FMR) to execute the fund's portfolio transactions, FMR considers factors deemed relevant in the context of a particular trade and in regard to FMR's overall responsibilities with respect to the fund and other investment accounts, including any instructions from the fund's portfolio manager, which may emphasize, for example, speed of execution over other factors. The factors considered will influence whether it is appropriate to execute an order using ECNs, electronic channels including algorithmic trading, or by actively working an order. Other factors deemed relevant may include, but are not limited to: price; the size and type of the transaction; the reasonableness of compensation to be paid, including spreads and commission rates; the speed and certainty of trade executions, including broker willingness to commit capital; the nature and characteristics of the markets for the security to be purchased or sold, including the degree of specialization of the broker in such markets or securities; the availability of liquidity in the security, including the liquidity and depth afforded by a market center or market-maker; the reliability of a market center or broker; the broker's overall trading relationship with FMR; the trader's assessment of whether and how closely the broker likely will follow the trader's instructions to the broker; the degree of anonymity that a particular broker or market can provide; the potential for avoiding market impact; the execution services rendered on a continuing basis; the execution efficiency, settlement capability, and financial condition of the firm; arrangements for payment of fund expenses, if applicable; and the provision of additional brokerage and research products and services, if applicable. In seeking best qualitative execution, FMR may select a broker using a trading method for which the broker may charge a higher commission than its lowest available commission rate. FMR also may select a broker that charges more than the lowest available commission rate available from another broker. For futures transactions, the selection of a futures commission merchant (FCM) is generally based on the overall quality of execution and other services provided by the FCM.

The Acquisition of Brokerage and Research Products and Services

Brokers (who are not affiliates of FMR) that execute transactions for the fund may receive higher compensation from the fund than other brokers might have charged the fund, in recognition of the value of the brokerage or research products and services they provide to FMR or its affiliates.

Research Products and Services. These products and services may include: economic, industry, company, municipal, sovereign (U.S. and non-U.S.), legal, or political research reports; market color; company meeting facilitation; compilation of securities prices, earnings, dividends and similar data; quotation services, data, information and other services; analytical computer software and services; and investment recommendations. FMR may request that a broker provide a specific proprietary or third-party product or service. Some of these products and services supplement FMR's own research activities in providing investment advice to the fund.

Execution Services. In addition, products and services may include those that assist in the execution, clearing, and settlement of securities transactions, as well as other incidental functions (including but not limited to communication services related to trade execution, order routing and algorithmic trading, post-trade matching, exchange of messages among brokers or dealers, custodians and institutions, and the use of electronic confirmation and affirmation of institutional trades).

Mixed-Use Products and Services. In addition to receiving brokerage and research products and services via written reports and computer-delivered services, such reports may also be provided by telephone and in personal meetings with securities analysts, corporate and industry spokespersons, economists, academicians and government representatives and others with relevant professional expertise. FMR and its affiliates may use commission dollars to obtain certain products or services that are not used exclusively in FMR's or its affiliates' investment decision-making process (mixed-use products or services). In those circumstances, FMR or its affiliates will make a good faith judgment to evaluate the various benefits and uses to which they intend to put the mixed-use product or service, and will pay for that portion of the mixed-use product or service that does not qualify as brokerage and research products and services with their own resources (referred to as "hard dollars").

Benefit to FMR. FMR's expenses would likely be increased if it attempted to generate these additional products and services through its own efforts, or if it paid for these products or services itself. Certain of the brokerage and research products and services FMR receives from brokers are furnished by brokers on their own initiative, either in connection with a particular transaction or as part of their overall services. Some of these products or services may not have an explicit cost associated with such product or service.

FMR's Decision-Making Process. Before causing the fund to pay a particular level of compensation, FMR will make a good faith determination that the compensation is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and/or research products and services provided to FMR, viewed in terms of the particular transaction for the fund or FMR's overall responsibilities to the fund or other investment companies and investment accounts. While FMR may take into account the brokerage and/or research products and services provided by a broker in determining whether compensation paid is reasonable, neither FMR nor the fund incurs an obligation to any broker, dealer, or third party to pay for any product or service (or portion thereof) by generating a specific amount of compensation or otherwise. Typically, these products and services assist FMR and its affiliates in terms of its overall investment responsibilities to the fund and other investment companies and investment accounts; however, each product or service received may not benefit the fund. Certain funds or investment accounts may use brokerage commissions to acquire brokerage and research products and services that may also benefit other funds or accounts managed by FMR or its affiliates.

Research Contracts. FMR has arrangements with certain third-party research providers and brokers through whom FMR effects fund trades, whereby FMR may pay with fund commissions or hard dollars for all or a portion of the cost of research products and services purchased from such research providers or brokers. If hard dollar payments are used, FMR may still cause the fund to pay more for execution than the lowest commission rate available from the broker providing research products and services to FMR, or that may be available from another broker. FMR views hard dollar payments for research products and services as likely to reduce the fund's total commission costs even though it is expected that in such hard dollar arrangements the commissions available for recapture and to pay fund expenses, as described below, will decrease. FMR's determination to pay for research products and services separately, rather than bundled with fund commissions, is wholly voluntary on FMR's part and may be extended to additional brokers or discontinued with any broker participating in this arrangement.

Commission Recapture

FMR may allocate brokerage transactions to brokers (who are not affiliates of FMR) who have entered into arrangements with FMR under which the broker, using a predetermined methodology, rebates a portion of the compensation paid by a fund to offset that fund's expenses, which may be paid to FMR or its affiliates. Not all brokers with whom the fund trades have agreed to participate in brokerage commission recapture.

Affiliated Transactions

FMR may place trades with certain brokers, including National Financial Services LLC (NFS), with whom it is under common control provided FMR determines that these affiliates' trade execution abilities and costs are comparable to those of non-affiliated, qualified brokerage firms.

The Trustees of the fund have approved procedures whereby a fund may purchase securities that are offered in underwritings in which an affiliate of FMR participates. In addition, for underwritings where an FMR affiliate participates as a principal underwriter, certain restrictions may apply that could, among other things, limit the amount of securities that the fund could purchase in the underwritings.

Trade Allocation

Although the Trustees and officers of the fund are substantially the same as those of other funds managed by FMR or its affiliates, investment decisions for the fund are made independently from those of other funds or investment accounts (including proprietary accounts) managed by FMR or its affiliates. The same security is often held in the portfolio of more than one of these funds or investment accounts. Simultaneous transactions are inevitable when several funds and investment accounts are managed by the same investment adviser, particularly when the same security is suitable for the investment objective of more than one fund or investment account.

When two or more funds or investment accounts are simultaneously engaged in the purchase or sale of the same security, including a futures contract, the prices and amounts are allocated in accordance with procedures believed by FMR to be appropriate and equitable to each fund or investment account. In some cases adherence to these procedures could have a detrimental effect on the price or value of the security as far as the fund is concerned. In other cases, however, the ability of the fund to participate in volume transactions will produce better executions and prices for the fund.

Commissions Paid

A fund may pay compensation including both commissions and spreads in connection with the placement of portfolio transactions. The amount of brokerage commissions paid by a fund may change from year to year because of, among other things, changing asset levels, shareholder activity, and/or portfolio turnover.

<R>For the fiscal years ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, and February 29, 2008, the fund paid no brokerage commissions.</R>

<R>During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, the fund paid no brokerage commissions to firms for providing research or brokerage services.</R>

<R>During the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2009, the fund did not allocate brokerage commissions to firms for providing research or brokerage services.</R>

VALUATION

Each class's NAV is the value of a single share. The NAV of each class is computed by adding the class's pro rata share of the value of the fund's investments, cash, and other assets, subtracting the class's pro rata share of the fund's liabilities, subtracting the liabilities allocated to the class, and dividing the result by the number of shares of that class that are outstanding.

Portfolio securities and other assets are valued on the basis of amortized cost. This technique involves initially valuing an instrument at its cost as adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount rather than its current market value. The amortized cost value of an instrument may be higher or lower than the price the fund would receive if it sold the instrument.

Securities of other open-end investment companies are valued at their respective NAVs.

At such intervals as they deem appropriate, the Trustees consider the extent to which NAV calculated by using market valuations would deviate from the $1.00 per share calculated using amortized cost valuation. If the Trustees believe that a deviation from the fund's amortized cost per share may result in material dilution or other unfair results to shareholders, the Trustees have agreed to take such corrective action, if any, as they deem appropriate to eliminate or reduce, to the extent reasonably practicable, the dilution or unfair results. Such corrective action could include selling portfolio instruments prior to maturity to realize capital gains or losses or to shorten average portfolio maturity; withholding dividends; redeeming shares in kind; establishing NAV by using available market quotations; and such other measures as the Trustees may deem appropriate.

BUYING, SELLING, AND EXCHANGING INFORMATION

The fund may make redemption payments in whole or in part in readily marketable securities or other property pursuant to procedures approved by the Trustees if FMR determines it is in the best interests of the fund. Such securities or other property will be valued for this purpose as they are valued in computing each class's NAV. Shareholders that receive securities or other property will realize, upon receipt, a gain or loss for tax purposes, and will incur additional costs and be exposed to market risk prior to and upon sale of such securities or other property.

DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAXES

Dividends. To the extent that the fund's income is designated as federally tax-exempt interest, the dividends declared by the fund will be federally tax-exempt, provided that the fund qualifies to pay tax-exempt dividends. In order to qualify to pay tax-exempt dividends, at least 50% of the value of the fund's total assets (including uninvested assets) must consist of tax-exempt municipal securities at the close of each quarter of the fund's taxable year. Short-term capital gains are taxable at ordinary income tax rates.

Generally, the fund purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the opinion of bond counsel, is free from federal income tax and from the federal AMT. Neither FMR nor the fund guarantees that this opinion is correct, and there is no assurance that the IRS will agree with bond counsel's opinion. Issuers or other parties generally enter into covenants requiring continuing compliance with federal tax requirements to preserve the tax-free status of interest payments over the life of the security. If at any time the covenants are not complied with, or if the IRS otherwise determines that the issuer did not comply with relevant tax requirements, interest payments from a security could become federally taxable, possibly retroactively to the date the security was issued and you may need to file an amended income tax return. For certain types of structured securities, the tax status of the pass-through of tax-free income may also be based on the federal and state tax treatment of the structure.

Interest on certain "private activity" securities is subject to the federal AMT, although the interest continues to be excludable from gross income for other tax purposes. Interest from private activity securities is a tax preference item for the purposes of determining whether a taxpayer is subject to the AMT and the amount of AMT to be paid, if any.

A portion of the gain on municipal bonds purchased at market discount after April 30, 1993 is taxable to shareholders as ordinary income, not as capital gains.

<R>California Tax Matters. As long as a fund continues to qualify as a regulated investment company under the federal Internal Revenue Code, it will incur no California income or franchise tax liability on income and capital gains distributed to shareholders. California personal income tax law provides that exempt-interest dividends paid by a regulated investment company, or series thereof, from interest on obligations that are exempt from California personal income tax are excludable from gross income. For a fund to qualify to pay exempt-interest dividends under California law, at least 50% of the value of its assets must consist of such obligations at the close of each quarter of its fiscal year. For purposes of California personal income taxation, distributions to individual shareholders derived from interest on other types of obligations and short-term capital gains will be taxed as dividends, and any long-term capital gain distributions will be taxed as capital gains. California has an alternative minimum tax similar to the federal AMT described above. However, the California AMT does not include interest from private activity municipal obligations as an item of tax preference. Interest on indebtedness incurred or continued by a shareholder in connection with the purchase of shares of a fund will not be deductible for California personal income tax purposes. Corporate taxpayers should note that dividends will not be exempt from California corporate income or franchise tax.</R>

Capital Gain Distributions. The fund may distribute any net realized capital gains once a year or more often, as necessary.

<R> </R>

Tax Status of the Fund. The fund intends to qualify each year as a "regulated investment company" under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code so that it will not be liable for federal tax on income and capital gains distributed to shareholders. In order to qualify as a regulated investment company, and avoid being subject to federal income or excise taxes at the fund level, the fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized capital gains within each calendar year as well as on a fiscal year basis, and intends to comply with other tax rules applicable to regulated investment companies.

Other Tax Information. The information above is only a summary of some of the tax consequences generally affecting the fund and its shareholders, and no attempt has been made to discuss individual tax consequences. It is up to you or your tax preparer to determine whether the sale of shares of the fund resulted in a capital gain or loss or other tax consequence to you. In addition to federal income taxes, shareholders may be subject to state and local taxes on fund distributions, and shares may be subject to state and local personal property taxes. Investors should consult their tax advisers to determine whether a fund is suitable to their particular tax situation.

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

<R>The Trustees and executive officers of the trust and fund, as applicable, are listed below. The Board of Trustees governs the fund and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders. The Trustees are experienced executives who meet periodically throughout the year to oversee the fund's activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that provide services to the fund, oversee management of the risks associated with such activities and contractual arrangements, and review the fund's performance. Except for James C. Curvey, each of the Trustees oversees 188 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate. Mr. Curvey oversees 410 funds advised by FMR or an affiliate.</R>

<R>The Trustees hold office without limit in time except that (a) any Trustee may resign; (b) any Trustee may be removed by written instrument, signed by at least two-thirds of the number of Trustees prior to such removal; (c) any Trustee who requests to be retired or who has become incapacitated by illness or injury may be retired by written instrument signed by a majority of the other Trustees; and (d) any Trustee may be removed at any special meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds vote of the outstanding voting securities of the trust. Each Trustee who is not an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) (Independent Trustee), shall retire not later than the last day of the calendar year in which his or her 72nd birthday occurs. The Independent Trustees may waive this mandatory retirement age policy with respect to individual Trustees. The executive officers hold office without limit in time, except that any officer may resign or may be removed by a vote of a majority of the Trustees at any regular meeting or any special meeting of the Trustees. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the past five years.</R>

<R>Experience, Skills, Attributes, and Qualifications of the Fund's Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has adopted a statement of policy that describes the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that are necessary and desirable for potential Independent Trustee candidates ("Statement of Policy"). The Board believes that each Trustee satisfied at the time he or she was initially elected or appointed a Trustee, and continues to satisfy, the standards contemplated by the Statement of Policy. The Governance and Nominating Committee also engages professional search firms to help identify potential Independent Trustee candidates who have the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills consistent with the Statement of Policy. From time to time, additional criteria based on the composition and skills of the current Independent Trustees, as well as experience or skills that may be appropriate in light of future changes to board composition, business conditions, and regulatory or other developments, have also been considered by the professional search firms and the Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition, the Board takes into account the Trustees' commitment and participation in Board and committee meetings, as well as their leadership of standing and ad hoc committees throughout their tenure.</R>

<R>In determining that a particular Trustee was and continues to be qualified to serve as a Trustee, the Board has considered a variety of criteria, none of which, in isolation, was controlling. The Board believes that, collectively, the Trustees have balanced and diverse experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills, which allow the Board to operate effectively in governing the fund and protecting the interests of shareholders. Information about the specific experience, skills, attributes, and qualifications of each Trustee, which in each case led to the Board's conclusion that the Trustee should serve (or continue to serve) as a trustee of the fund, is provided below.</R>

<R>Board Structure and Oversight Function. Abigail P. Johnson is an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) and currently serves as Chairman. The Trustees have determined that an interested Chairman is appropriate and benefits shareholders because an interested Chairman has a personal and professional stake in the quality and continuity of services provided to the fund. Independent Trustees exercise their informed business judgment to appoint an individual of their choosing to serve as Chairman, regardless of whether the Trustee happens to be independent or a member of management. The Independent Trustees have determined that they can act independently and effectively without having an Independent Trustee serve as Chairman and that a key structural component for assuring that they are in a position to do so is for the Independent Trustees to constitute a substantial majority for the Board. The Independent Trustees also regularly meet in executive session. Kenneth L. Wolfe serves as Chairman of the Independent Trustees and as such (i) acts as a liaison between the Independent Trustees and management with respect to matters important to the Independent Trustees and (ii) with management prepares agendas for Board meetings.</R>

<R>Fidelity funds are overseen by different Boards of Trustees. The fund's Board oversees Fidelity's investment-grade bond, money market, and asset allocation funds and another Board oversees Fidelity's equity and high income funds. The asset allocation funds may invest in Fidelity funds that are overseen by such other Board. The use of separate Boards, each with its own committee structure, allows the Trustees of each group of Fidelity funds to focus on the unique issues of the funds they oversee, including common research, investment, and operational issues. On occasion, the separate Boards establish joint committees to address issues of overlapping consequences for the Fidelity funds overseen by each Board.</R>

<R>The Trustees operate using a system of committees to facilitate the timely and efficient consideration of all matters of importance to the Trustees, the fund, and fund shareholders and to facilitate compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and oversight of the fund's activities and associated risks. The Board, acting through its committees, has charged FMR and its affiliates with (i) identifying events or circumstances the occurrence of which could have demonstrably adverse effects on the fund's business and/or reputation; (ii) implementing processes and controls to lessen the possibility that such events or circumstances occur or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur; and (iii) creating and maintaining a system designed to evaluate continuously business and market conditions in order to facilitate the identification and implementation processes described in (i) and (ii) above. Because the day-to-day operations and activities of the fund are carried out by or through FMR, its affiliates and other service providers, the fund's exposure to risks is mitigated but not eliminated by the processes overseen by the Trustees. While each of the Board's committees has responsibility for overseeing different aspects of the fund's activities, oversight is exercised primarily through the Operations and Audit Committees. Appropriate personnel, including but not limited to the fund's Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO"), FMR's internal auditor, the independent accountants, the fund's Treasurer and portfolio management personnel, make periodic reports to the Board's committees, as appropriate. The responsibilities of each committee, including their oversight responsibilities, are described further under "Standing Committees of the Fund's Trustees."</R>

Interested Trustees*:

Correspondence intended for each Trustee who is an interested person may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

Name, Age; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+

Abigail P. Johnson (48)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009

Ms. Johnson is Trustee and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of certain Trusts. Ms. Johnson serves as President of Personal and Workplace Investing (2005-present). Ms. Johnson is a Director of FMR LLC. Previously, Ms. Johnson served as President and a Director of FMR (2001-2005), a Trustee of other investment companies advised by FMR, Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc., and FMR Co., Inc. (2001-2005), Senior Vice President of the Fidelity funds (2001-2005), and managed a number of Fidelity funds. Ms. Abigail P. Johnson and Mr. Arthur E. Johnson are not related.

James C. Curvey (74)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2007

Mr. Curvey also serves as Trustee (2007-present) of other investment companies advised by FMR. Mr. Curvey is a Director of FMR and FMR Co., Inc. (2007-present). Mr. Curvey is also Vice Chairman (2006-present) and Director of FMR LLC. In addition, Mr. Curvey serves as an Overseer for the Boston Symphony Orchestra and a member of the Trustees of Villanova University.

* Trustees have been determined to be "Interested Trustees" by virtue of, among other things, their affiliation with the trust or various entities under common control with FMR.

<R>+ The information above includes each Trustee's principal occupation during the last five years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills relevant to each Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the conclusion that each Trustee should serve as a Trustee for the fund.</R>

Independent Trustees:

Correspondence intended for each Independent Trustee (that is, the Trustees other than the Interested Trustees) may be sent to Fidelity Investments, P.O. Box 55235, Boston, Massachusetts 02205-5235.

<R>Name, Age; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+</R>

<R>Albert R. Gamper, Jr. (67)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006</R>

Prior to his retirement in December 2004, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman of the Board of CIT Group Inc. (commercial finance). During his tenure with CIT Group Inc. Mr. Gamper served in numerous senior management positions, including Chairman (1987-1989; 1999-2001; 2002-2004), Chief Executive Officer (1987-2004), and President (2002-2003). He also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Tyco Capital Corporation (2001-2002). Mr. Gamper currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Public Service Enterprise Group (utilities, 2000-present), a member of the Board of Trustees, Rutgers University (2004-present), and Chairman of the Board of Saint Barnabas Health Care System. Previously, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman of the Board of Governors, Rutgers University (2004-2007).

<R>Robert F. Gartland (58)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010</R>

Mr. Gartland is a partner and investor of Vietnam Partners LLC (investments and consulting, 2008-present) and is Chairman and an investor in Gartland and Mellina Group Corp. (consulting, 2009-present). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Gartland held a variety of positions at Morgan Stanley (financial services, 1979-2007) including Managing Director (1987-2007).

<R>Arthur E. Johnson (63)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

Mr. Johnson serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Eaton Corporation (diversified power management, 2009-present) and AGL Resources, Inc. (holding company). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Johnson served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategic Development of Lockheed Martin Corporation (defense contractor, 1999-2009). He previously served on the Board of Directors of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (1999-2008) and Delta Airlines (2005-2007). Mr. Arthur E. Johnson and Ms. Abigail P. Johnson are not related.

<R>Michael E. Kenneally (55)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009</R>

Prior to his retirement, Mr. Kenneally served as a Member of the Advisory Board for certain Fidelity Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds (2008-2009). Mr. Kenneally served as Chairman and Global Chief Executive Officer of Credit Suisse Asset Management (2003-2005). Mr. Kenneally was a Director of the Credit Suisse Funds (U.S. mutual funds, 2004-2008) and certain other closed-end funds (2004-2005) and was awarded the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation in 1991.

<R>James H. Keyes (69)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2007</R>

Mr. Keyes serves as a member of the Boards of Navistar International Corporation (manufacture and sale of trucks, buses, and diesel engines, since 2002) and Pitney Bowes, Inc. (integrated mail, messaging, and document management solutions, since 1998). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Keyes served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Johnson Controls (automotive, building, and energy, 1998-2002) and as a member of the Board of LSI Logic Corporation (semiconductor technologies, 1984-2008).

<R>Marie L. Knowles (63)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2001</R>

Prior to Ms. Knowles' retirement in June 2000, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) (diversified energy, 1996-2000). From 1993 to 1996, she was a Senior Vice President of ARCO and President of ARCO Transportation Company. She served as a Director of ARCO from 1996 to 1998. Ms. Knowles currently serves as a Director of McKesson Corporation (healthcare service, since 2002). Ms. Knowles is an Honorary Trustee of the Brookings Institution and a member of the Board of the Catalina Island Conservancy and of the Santa Catalina Island Company (2009-present). She also serves as a member of the Advisory Board for the School of Engineering of the University of Southern California and the Foundation Board of the School of Architecture at the University of Virginia (2007-present). Previously, Ms. Knowles served as a Director of Phelps Dodge Corporation (copper mining and manufacturing, 1994-2007).

<R>Kenneth L. Wolfe (71)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005</R>

Mr. Wolfe is Chairman of the Independent Trustees of the Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds (2008-present). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Wolfe served as Chairman and a Director (2007-2009) and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hershey Foods Corporation. He also served as a member of the Boards of Adelphia Communications Corporation (telecommunications, 2003-2006), Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (medical/pharmaceutical, 1993-2007), and Revlon, Inc. (personal care products, 2004-2009).

<R>+ The information above includes each Trustee's principal occupation during the last five years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills relevant to each Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the conclusion that each Trustee should serve as a Trustee for the fund.</R>

Executive Officers:

Correspondence intended for each executive officer may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

Name, Age; Principal Occupation

<R>John R. Hebble (51)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008</R>

President and Treasurer of Fidelity's Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds. Mr. Hebble also serves as Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of The North Carolina Capital Management Trust: Cash and Term Portfolio (2008-present), Assistant Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2009-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments.

<R>Boyce I. Greer (54)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005 or 2006</R>

Vice President of Fidelity's Fixed Income Funds (2006) and Asset Allocation Funds (2005). Mr. Greer is also a Trustee of other investment companies advised by FMR. Mr. Greer is President of the Asset Allocation Division (2008-present), President and a Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2008-present), President and a Director of Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (2007-present), and an Executive Vice President of FMR (2005-present). Previously, Mr. Greer served as Executive Vice President of FMR Co., Inc. (2005-2009), and as a Director and Managing Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2002-2005).

<R>Robert P. Brown (46)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010</R>

Vice President of Fidelity's Money Market Funds. Mr. Brown also serves as President, Money Market Group of FMR (2010-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments.

Scott C. Goebel (42)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008

Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (CLO) of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Goebel also serves as General Counsel, Secretary, and Senior Vice President of FMR (2008-present) and FMR Co., Inc. (2008-present); Deputy General Counsel of FMR LLC; Chief Legal Officer of Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (2008-present) and Assistant Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc. (2008-present), Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (2008-present), Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (2008-present), and Fidelity Research and Analysis Company (2008-present). Previously, Mr. Goebel served as Assistant Secretary of the Funds (2007-2008) and as Vice President and Secretary of Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) (2005-2007).

Holly C. Laurent (55)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Officer of the Fidelity funds. Ms. Laurent is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Ms. Laurent was Senior Vice President and Head of Legal for Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd. (2006-2008), and Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Group Head for FMR LLC (2005-2006).

Christine Reynolds (51)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008

Chief Financial Officer of the Fidelity funds. Ms. Reynolds became President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) in August 2008. Ms. Reynolds served as Chief Operating Officer of FPCMS (2007-2008). Previously, Ms. Reynolds served as President, Treasurer, and Anti-Money Laundering officer of the Fidelity funds (2004-2007).

Michael H. Whitaker (42)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008

Chief Compliance Officer of Fidelity's Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds. Mr. Whitaker is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2007-present). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Whitaker worked at MFS Investment Management where he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer (2004-2006), and Assistant General Counsel.

<R>Jeffrey S. Christian (48)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009</R>

Deputy Treasurer of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Christian is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Christian served as Chief Financial Officer (2008-2009) of certain Fidelity funds and Senior Vice President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) (2004-2009).

<R>Bryan A. Mehrmann (48)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005</R>

Deputy Treasurer of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Mehrmann is an employee of Fidelity Investments.

Stephanie J. Dorsey (40)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008

Deputy Treasurer of Fidelity's Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds. Ms. Dorsey is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2008-present). Previously, Ms. Dorsey served as Treasurer (2004-2008) of the JPMorgan Mutual Funds and Vice President (2004-2008) of JPMorgan Chase Bank.

Paul M. Murphy (62)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2007

Assistant Treasurer of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Murphy is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Murphy served as Chief Financial Officer of the Fidelity funds (2005-2006), Vice President and Associate General Counsel of FMR (2007), and Senior Vice President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) (1994-2007).

<R>Kenneth B. Robins (40)</R>

<R>

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009</R>

Assistant Treasurer of the Fidelity Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds. Mr. Robins also serves as President and Treasurer of other Fidelity funds (2008-present; 2010-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2004-present). Previously, Mr. Robins served as Deputy Treasurer of the Fidelity funds (2005-2008) and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of The North Carolina Capital Management Trust: Cash and Term Portfolios (2006-2008).

Gary W. Ryan (51)

 

Year of Election or Appointment: 2005

Assistant Treasurer of the Fidelity funds. Mr. Ryan is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Ryan served as Vice President of Fund Reporting in Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) (1999-2005).

<R>Standing Committees of the Fund's Trustees. The Board of Trustees has established various committees to support the Independent Trustees in acting independently in pursuing the best interests of the funds and their shareholders. Currently, the Board of Trustees has three standing committees. The members of each committee are Independent Trustees.</R>

<R>The Operations Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Mr. Wolfe currently serving as Chair. The committee normally meets at least six times a year, or more frequently as called by the Chair, and serves as a forum for consideration of issues of importance to, or calling for particular determinations by, the Independent Trustees. The committee considers matters involving potential conflicts of interest between the funds and FMR and its affiliates and reviews proposed contracts and the proposed continuation of contracts between the funds and FMR and its affiliates, and annually reviews and makes recommendations regarding contracts with third parties unaffiliated with FMR, including insurance coverage and custody agreements. The committee has oversight of compliance issues not specifically within the scope of any other committee. These matters include, but are not limited to, significant non-conformance with contract requirements and other significant regulatory matters and recommending to the Board of Trustees the designation of a person to serve as the funds' CCO. The committee (i) serves as the primary point of contact for the CCO with regard to Board-related functions; (ii) oversees the annual performance review of the CCO; (iii) makes recommendations concerning the CCO's compensation; and (iv) makes recommendations as needed in respect of the removal of the CCO. The committee is also responsible for definitive action on all compliance matters involving the potential for significant reimbursement by FMR. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, the committee held 22 meetings.</R>

<R>The Audit Committee is composed of all of the Independent Trustees, with Ms. Knowles currently serving as Chair. All committee members must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company's balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. At least one committee member will be an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by the SEC. The committee normally meets four times a year, or more frequently as called by the Chair. The committee meets separately at least annually with the funds' Treasurer, with the funds' Chief Financial Officer (CFO), with personnel responsible for the internal audit function of FMR LLC, and with the funds' outside auditors. The committee has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the outside auditors employed by the funds. The committee assists the Trustees in overseeing and monitoring: (i) the systems of internal accounting and financial controls of the funds and the funds' service providers (to the extent such controls impact the funds' financial statements); (ii) the funds' auditors and the annual audits of the funds' financial statements; (iii) the financial reporting processes of the funds; (iv) whistleblower reports; and (v) the accounting policies and disclosures of the funds. The committee considers and acts upon (i) the provision by any outside auditor of any non-audit services for any fund, and (ii) the provision by any outside auditor of certain non-audit services to fund service providers and their affiliates to the extent that such approval (in the case of this clause (ii)) is required under applicable regulations of the SEC. In furtherance of the foregoing, the committee has adopted (and may from time to time amend or supplement) and provides oversight of policies and procedures for non-audit engagements by outside auditors of the funds. It is responsible for approving all audit engagement fees and terms for the funds and for resolving disagreements between a fund and any outside auditor regarding any fund's financial reporting. Auditors of the funds report directly to the committee. The committee will obtain assurance of independence and objectivity from the outside auditors, including a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the auditor and the funds and any service providers consistent with the rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The committee will receive reports of compliance with provisions of the Auditor Independence Regulations relating to the hiring of employees or former employees of the outside auditors. It oversees and receives reports on the funds' service providers' internal controls and reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of the service providers' accounting and financial controls, including: (i) any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the funds' ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data; (ii) any change in the fund's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the fund's internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) any fraud, whether material or not, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the funds' or service providers internal controls over financial reporting. The committee will also review any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies or published reports that raise material issues regarding the funds' financial statements or accounting policies. These matters may also be reviewed by the Operations Committee. The committee reviews at least annually a report from each outside auditor describing any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control, peer review, or Public Company Accounting Oversight Board examination of the auditing firm and any material issues raised by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities of the auditing firm and in each case any steps taken to deal with such issues. The committee will oversee and receive reports on the funds' financial reporting process, will discuss with FMR, the funds' Treasurer, outside auditors and, if appropriate, internal audit personnel of FMR LLC their qualitative judgments about the appropriateness and acceptability of accounting principles and financial disclosure practices used or proposed for adoption by the funds. The committee will review with FMR, the funds' outside auditor, internal audit personnel of FMR LLC and, as appropriate, legal counsel the results of audits of the funds' financial statements. The committee will review periodically the funds' major internal controls exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and control such exposures. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, the committee held five meetings.</R>

<R>The Governance and Nominating Committee is composed of Messrs. Wolfe (Chair) and Gamper, and Ms. Knowles. The committee meets as called by the Chair. With respect to fund governance and board administration matters, the committee periodically reviews procedures of the Board of Trustees and its committees (including committee charters) and periodically reviews compensation of Independent Trustees. The committee monitors corporate governance matters and makes recommendations to the Board of Trustees on the frequency and structure of the Board of Trustee meetings and on any other aspect of Board procedures. It acts as the administrative committee under the retirement plan for Independent Trustees who retired prior to December 30, 1996 and under the fee deferral plan for Independent Trustees. It reviews the performance of legal counsel employed by the funds and the Independent Trustees. On behalf of the Independent Trustees, the committee will make such findings and determinations as to the independence of counsel for the Independent Trustees as may be necessary or appropriate under applicable regulations or otherwise. The committee is also responsible for Board administrative matters applicable to Independent Trustees, such as expense reimbursement policies and compensation for attendance at meetings, conferences and other events. The committee monitors compliance with, acts as the administrator of, and makes determinations in respect of, the provisions of the code of ethics and any supplemental policies regarding personal securities transactions applicable to the Independent Trustees. The committee monitors the functioning of each Board committee and makes recommendations for any changes, including the creation or elimination of standing or ad hoc Board committees. The committee monitors regulatory and other developments to determine whether to recommend modifications to the committee's responsibilities or other Trustee policies and procedures in light of rule changes, reports concerning "best practices" in corporate governance and other developments in mutual fund governance. The committee meets with Independent Trustees at least once a year to discuss matters relating to fund governance. The committee recommends that the Board establish such special or ad hoc Board committees as may be desirable or necessary from time to time in order to address ethical, legal, or other matters that may arise. The committee also oversees the annual self-evaluation of the Board of Trustees and establishes procedures to allow it to exercise this oversight function. In conducting this oversight, the committee shall address all matters that it considers relevant to the performance of the Board of Trustees and shall report the results of its evaluation to the Board of Trustees, including any recommended amendments to the principles of governance, and any recommended changes to the funds' or the Board of Trustees' policies, procedures, and structures. The committee reviews periodically the size and composition of the Board of Trustees as a whole and recommends, if necessary, measures to be taken so that the Board of Trustees reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity required for the Board as a whole and contains at least the minimum number of Independent Trustees required by law. The committee makes nominations for the election or appointment of Independent Trustees and non-management Members of any Advisory Board, and for membership on committees. The committee shall have authority to retain and terminate any third-party advisers, including authority to approve fees and other retention terms. Such advisers may include search firms to identify Independent Trustee candidates and board compensation consultants. The committee may conduct or authorize investigations into or studies of matters within the committee's scope of responsibilities, and may retain, at the funds' expense, such independent counsel or other advisers as it deems necessary. The committee will consider nominees to the Board of Trustees recommended by shareholders based upon the criteria applied to candidates presented to the committee by a search firm or other source. Recommendations, along with appropriate background material concerning the candidate that demonstrates his or her ability to serve as an Independent Trustee of the funds, should be submitted to the Chair of the committee at the address maintained for communications with Independent Trustees. If the committee retains a search firm, the Chair will generally forward all such submissions to the search firm for evaluation. With respect to the criteria for selecting Independent Trustees, it is expected that all candidates will possess the following minimum qualifications: (i) unquestioned personal integrity; (ii) not an interested person of FMR or its affiliates within the meaning of the 1940 Act; (iii) does not have a material relationship (e.g., commercial, banking, consulting, legal, or accounting) that could create an appearance of lack of independence in respect of FMR and its affiliates; (iv) has the disposition to act independently in respect of FMR and its affiliates and others in order to protect the interests of the funds and all shareholders; (v) ability to attend regularly scheduled Board meetings during the year; (vi) demonstrates sound business judgment gained through broad experience in significant positions where the candidate has dealt with management, technical, financial, or regulatory issues; (vii) sufficient financial or accounting knowledge to add value in the complex financial environment of the funds; (viii) experience on corporate or other institutional oversight bodies having similar responsibilities, but which board memberships or other relationships could not result in business or regulatory conflicts with the funds; and (ix) capacity for the hard work and attention to detail that is required to be an effective Independent Trustee in light of the funds' complex regulatory, operational, and marketing setting. The Governance and Nominating Committee may determine that a candidate who does not have the type of previous experience or knowledge referred to above should nevertheless be considered as a nominee if the Governance and Nominating Committee finds that the candidate has additional qualifications such that his or her qualifications, taken as a whole, demonstrate the same level of fitness to serve as an Independent Trustee. During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, the committee held six meetings.</R>

The following table sets forth information describing the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each Trustee in the fund and in all funds in the aggregate within the same fund family overseen by the Trustee for the calendar year ended December 31, 2009.

<R>Interested Trustees</R>

<R>DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Abigail P. Johnson

James C. Curvey</R>

<R>The fund

none

none</R>

<R>AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000</R>

<R>Independent Trustees</R>

<R>DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

Albert R. Gamper, Jr.

Robert F. Gartland

Arthur E. Johnson

Michael E. Kenneally</R>

<R>The fund

none

none

none

none</R>

<R>AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

none

over $100,000

over $100,000</R>

<R>DOLLAR RANGE OF
FUND SHARES

James H. Keyes

Marie L. Knowles

Kenneth L. Wolfe</R>

<R>The fund

none

none

none</R>

<R>AGGREGATE DOLLAR RANGE OF FUND SHARES IN ALL FUNDS OVERSEEN WITHIN FUND FAMILY

over $100,000

over $100,000

over $100,000</R>

<R>The following table sets forth information describing the compensation of each Trustee for his or her services for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, or calendar year ended December 31, 2009, as applicable.</R>

<R>Compensation Table1</R>

<R>AGGREGATE
COMPENSATION
FROM A FUND

Albert R.
Gamper, Jr.

Robert F.
Gartland
2

Arthur E.
Johnson

Michael E.
Kenneally3

James H.
Keyes

Marie L.
Knowles

Kenneth L.
Wolfe

</R>

<R>The fund

$ 1,345

$ 0

$ 1,337

$ 1,337

$ 1,340

$ 1,431

$ 1,608

</R>

<R>TOTAL COMPENSATION
FROM THE FUND COMPLEXA

$ 374,500

$ 0

$ 372,500

$ 372,000

$ 373,500

$ 397,500

$ 447,000

</R>

<R>1 Abigail P. Johnson and James C. Curvey are interested persons and are compensated by FMR.</R>

<R>2 Effective March 1, 2010, Mr. Gartland serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.</R>

<R>3 For the period November 20, 2008 through July 14, 2009, Mr. Kenneally served as a Member of the Advisory Board. Effective July 15, 2009, Mr. Kenneally serves as a Member of the Board of Trustees.</R>

<R>A Reflects compensation received for the calendar year ended December 31, 2009 for 188 funds of 29 trusts (including Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC). Compensation figures include cash, amounts required to be deferred, and may include amounts deferred at the election of Trustees. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2009, the Trustees accrued required deferred compensation from the funds as follows: Albert R. Gamper, Jr., $162,500; Arthur E. Johnson, $162,500; Michael E. Kenneally, $127,138; James H. Keyes, $162,500; Marie L. Knowles, $175,000; and Kenneth L. Wolfe, $200,000.</R>

<R>As of February 28, 2010, the Trustees and officers of the fund owned, in the aggregate, less than 1% of the fund's total outstanding shares.</R>

<R>As of February 28, 2010, the following owned of record and/or beneficially 5% or more of Service Class's outstanding shares:</R>

<R>Class Name

Owner Name

City

State

Ownership %</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Mancini

San Juan Capo

CA

32.80%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Breen

San Jose

CA

19.74%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Cartotto

Valencia

CA

12.02%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Buettner

Walnut Creek

CA

9.99%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

JP Morgan Chase

Columbus

OH

8.54%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Armanious Trust

Rancho Sta Margarita

CA

8.53%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Pirrone

Torrance

CA

7.18%</R>

<R>Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class

Madison Investors LP

Coto De Caza

CA

5.61%</R>

CONTROL OF INVESTMENT ADVISERS

FMR LLC, as successor by merger to FMR Corp., is the ultimate parent company of FMR, Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM), Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (FMR U.K.), Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.), Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc. (FMR Japan), and Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC). The voting common shares of FMR LLC are divided into two series. Series B is held predominantly by members of the Edward C. Johnson 3d and Abigail P. Johnson family, directly or through trust and limited liability companies, and is entitled to 49% of the vote on any matter acted upon by the voting common shares. Series A is held predominantly by non-Johnson family member employees of FMR LLC and its affiliates and is entitled to 51% of the vote on any such matter. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders' voting agreement under which all Series B shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B shares. Under the 1940 Act, control of a company is presumed where one individual or group of individuals owns more than 25% of the voting securities of that company. Therefore, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders' voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the 1940 Act, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC.

At present, the primary business activities of FMR LLC and its subsidiaries are: (i) the provision of investment advisory, management, shareholder, investment information and assistance and certain fiduciary services for individual and institutional investors; (ii) the provision of securities brokerage services; (iii) the management and development of real estate; and (iv) the investment in and operation of a number of emerging businesses.

FIL Limited, a Bermuda company formed in 1968, is the ultimate parent company of FIL Investment Advisors (FIIA) and FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd. (FIIA(U.K.)L). Edward C. Johnson 3d, Abigail P. Johnson, other Johnson family members, and various trusts for the benefit of the Johnson family own, directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the voting common stock of FIL Limited. At present, the primary business activities of FIL Limited and its subsidiaries are the provision of investment advisory services to non-U.S. investment companies and private accounts investing in securities throughout the world.

FMR, FIMM, FMR U.K., FMR H.K., FMR Japan, FRAC, FIIA, FIIA(U.K.)L (the Investment Advisers), FDC, and the fund have adopted codes of ethics under Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act that set forth employees' fiduciary responsibilities regarding the fund, establish procedures for personal investing, and restrict certain transactions. Employees subject to the codes of ethics, including Fidelity investment personnel, may invest in securities for their own investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by the fund.

MANAGEMENT CONTRACT

The fund has entered into a management contract with FMR, pursuant to which FMR furnishes investment advisory and other services.

Management Services. Under the terms of its management contract with the fund, FMR acts as investment adviser and, subject to the supervision of the Board of Trustees, has overall responsibility for directing the investments of the fund in accordance with its investment objective, policies and limitations. FMR also provides the fund with all necessary office facilities and personnel for servicing the fund's investments, compensates all officers of the fund and all Trustees who are interested persons of the trust or of FMR, and all personnel of the fund or FMR performing services relating to research, statistical and investment activities.

In addition, FMR or its affiliates, subject to the supervision of the Board of Trustees, provide the management and administrative services necessary for the operation of the fund. These services include providing facilities for maintaining the fund's organization; supervising relations with custodians, transfer and pricing agents, accountants, underwriters and other persons dealing with the fund; preparing all general shareholder communications and conducting shareholder relations; maintaining the fund's records and the registration of the fund's shares under federal securities laws and making necessary filings under state securities laws; developing management and shareholder services for the fund; and furnishing reports, evaluations and analyses on a variety of subjects to the Trustees.

<R>Management-Related Expenses. (Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund) Under the terms of the fund's management contract, FMR is responsible for payment of all operating expenses of the fund with the exception of the following: interest, taxes, brokerage commissions and other costs with the connection with the purchase or sale of securities and other investment instruments, fees and expenses of the independent trustees, transfer agent fees, Rule 12b-1 fees and other expenses allocable at the class level, and such non-recurring expenses as may arise, including costs of any litigation to which the fund may be a party, and any obligation it may have to indemnify its officers and Trustees with respect to litigation.</R>

Management Fee. For the services of FMR under the management contract, the fund pays FMR a monthly management fee at the annual rate of 0.20% of the fund's average net assets throughout the month. The management fee paid to FMR by the fund is reduced by an amount equal to the fees and expenses paid by the fund to the Independent Trustees.

<R>For the fiscal years ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, and February 29, 2008, the fund paid FMR management fees of $5,363,108, $9,561,205, and $9,483,746, respectively, after reduction of fees and expenses paid by the fund to the Independent Trustees. In addition, for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2010 and 2009, and February 29, 2008, credits reducing management fees amounted to $4,605, $384,147, and $452,584, respectively.</R>

<R>On April 1, 2007, FMR reduced the management fee rate paid by the fund from 0.43% to 0.20%.</R>

FMR may, from time to time, voluntarily reimburse all or a portion of a class's operating expenses (exclusive of interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses), which is subject to revision or discontinuance. FMR retains the ability to be repaid for these expense reimbursements in the amount that expenses fall below the limit prior to the end of the fiscal year.

Expense reimbursements by FMR will increase a class's returns and yield, and repayment of the reimbursement by a class will lower its returns and yield.

Sub-Adviser - FIMM. On behalf of the fund, FMR has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with FIMM pursuant to which FIMM has day-to-day responsibility for choosing investments for the fund. Under the terms of the sub-advisory agreement, FMR, and not the fund, pays FIMM's fees.

Sub-Advisers - FIIA and FIIA(U.K.)L. On behalf of the fund, FIMM has entered into a master international fixed-income research agreement with FIIA. On behalf of the fund, FIIA, in turn, has entered into a fixed-income sub-research agreement with FIIA(U.K.)L. Pursuant to the fixed-income research agreements, FIMM may receive investment advice and research services concerning issuers and countries outside the United States. In particular, FIIA and FIIA(U.K.)L will make minimal credit risk and comparable quality determinations for foreign issuers that issue U.S. dollar-denominated securities. Under the terms of the master international fixed-income research agreement, FIMM, and not the fund, pays FIIA. Under the terms of the fixed-income sub-research agreement, FIIA, and not the fund, pays FIIA(U.K.)L.

Sub-Adviser - FRAC. On behalf of the fund, FMR, FIMM, and FRAC have entered into a research agreement. Pursuant to the research agreement, FRAC provides investment advice and research services on domestic issuers. Under the terms of the research agreement, FMR and FIMM, and not the fund, agree, in the aggregate, to pay FRAC.

Sub-Advisers - FMR U.K., FMR H.K., and FMR Japan. On behalf of the fund, FMR has entered into sub-advisory agreements with FMR U.K., FMR H.K., and FMR Japan. Pursuant to the sub-advisory agreements, FMR may receive from the sub-advisers investment research and advice on issuers outside the United States (non-discretionary services) and FMR may grant the sub-advisers investment management authority and the authority to buy and sell securities if FMR believes it would be beneficial to the fund (discretionary services). FMR, and not the fund, pays the sub-advisers.

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

The following Proxy Voting Guidelines were established by the Board of Trustees of the funds, after consultation with Fidelity. (The guidelines are reviewed periodically by Fidelity and by the Independent Trustees of the Fidelity funds, and, accordingly, are subject to change.)

I. General Principles

A. Voting of shares will be conducted in a manner consistent with the best interests of Fidelity Fund shareholders as follows: (i) securities of a portfolio company will generally be voted in a manner consistent with the Guidelines; and (ii) voting will be done without regard to any other Fidelity companies' relationship, business or otherwise, with that portfolio company.

B. FMR Investment Proxy Research votes proxies. In the event an Investment Proxy Research employee has a personal conflict with a portfolio company or an employee or director of a portfolio company, that employee will withdraw from making any proxy voting decisions with respect to that portfolio company. A conflict of interest arises when there are factors that may prompt one to question whether a Fidelity employee is acting solely in the best interests of Fidelity and its customers. Employees are expected to avoid situations that could present even the appearance of a conflict between their interests and the interests of Fidelity and its customers.

C. Except as set forth herein, FMR will generally vote in favor of routine management proposals.

D. Non-routine proposals will generally be voted in accordance with the Guidelines.

<R> E. Non-routine proposals not covered by the Guidelines or involving other special circumstances will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from the appropriate FMR analyst or portfolio manager, as applicable, subject to review by an attorney within FMR's General Counsel's office and a member of senior management within FMR Investment Proxy Research. A significant pattern of such proposals or other special circumstances will be referred to the appropriate Fidelity Fund Board Committee or its designee.</R>

F. FMR will vote on shareholder proposals not specifically addressed by the Guidelines based on an evaluation of a proposal's likelihood to enhance the economic returns or profitability of the portfolio company or to maximize shareholder value. Where information is not readily available to analyze the economic impact of the proposal, FMR will generally abstain.

G. Many Fidelity Funds invest in voting securities issued by companies that are domiciled outside the United States and are not listed on a U.S. securities exchange. Corporate governance standards, legal or regulatory requirements and disclosure practices in foreign countries can differ from those in the United States. When voting proxies relating to non-U.S. securities, FMR will generally evaluate proposals in the context of the Guidelines, but FMR may, where applicable and feasible, take into consideration differing laws and regulations in the relevant foreign market in determining how to vote shares.

H. In certain non-U.S. jurisdictions, shareholders voting shares of a portfolio company may be restricted from trading the shares for a period of time around the shareholder meeting date. Because such trading restrictions can hinder portfolio management and could result in a loss of liquidity for a fund, FMR will generally not vote proxies in circumstances where such restrictions apply. In addition, certain non-U.S. jurisdictions require voting shareholders to disclose current share ownership on a fund-by-fund basis. When such disclosure requirements apply, FMR will generally not vote proxies in order to safeguard fund holdings information.

I. Where a management-sponsored proposal is inconsistent with the Guidelines, FMR may receive a company's commitment to modify the proposal or its practice to conform to the Guidelines, and FMR will generally support management based on this commitment. If a company subsequently does not abide by its commitment, FMR will generally withhold authority for the election of directors at the next election.

II. Definitions (as used in this document)

A. Anti-Takeover Provision - includes fair price amendments; classified boards; "blank check" preferred stock; Golden Parachutes; supermajority provisions; Poison Pills; restricting the right to call special meetings; and any other provision that eliminates or limits shareholder rights.

B. Golden Parachute - Employment contracts, agreements, or policies that include an excise tax gross-up provision; single trigger for cash incentives; or may result in a lump sum payment of cash and acceleration of equity that may total more than three times annual compensation (salary and bonus) in the event of a termination following a change in control.

C. Greenmail - payment of a premium to repurchase shares from a shareholder seeking to take over a company through a proxy contest or other means.

<R> D. Sunset Provision - a condition in a charter or plan that specifies an expiration date.</R>

E. Permitted Bid Feature - a provision suspending the application of a Poison Pill, by shareholder referendum, in the event a potential acquirer announces a bona fide offer for all outstanding shares.

F. Poison Pill - a strategy employed by a potential take-over/target company to make its stock less attractive to an acquirer. Poison Pills are generally designed to dilute the acquirer's ownership and value in the event of a take-over.

G. Large-Capitalization Company - a company included in the Russell 1000 stock index.

H. Small-Capitalization Company - a company not included in the Russell 1000 stock index that is not a Micro-Capitalization Company.

I. Micro-Capitalization Company - a company with a market capitalization under US $300 million.

<R> J. Evergreen Provision - a feature which provides for an automatic increase in the shares available for grant under an equity award plan on a regular basis.</R>

III. Directors

A. Incumbent Directors

FMR will generally vote in favor of incumbent and nominee directors except where one or more such directors clearly appear to have failed to exercise reasonable judgment.

FMR will also generally withhold authority for the election of all directors or directors on responsible committees if:

1. An Anti-Takeover Provision was introduced, an Anti-Takeover Provision was extended, or a new Anti-Takeover Provision was adopted upon the expiration of an existing Anti-Takeover Provision, without shareholder approval except as set forth below.

With respect to Poison Pills, however, FMR will consider not withholding authority on the election of directors if all of the following conditions are met when a Poison Pill is introduced, extended, or adopted:

a. The Poison Pill includes a Sunset Provision of less than five years;

b. The Poison Pill includes a Permitted Bid Feature;

c. The Poison Pill is linked to a business strategy that will result in greater value for the shareholders; and

d. Shareholder approval is required to reinstate the Poison Pill upon expiration.

FMR will also consider not withholding authority on the election of directors when one or more of the conditions above are not met if a board is willing to strongly consider seeking shareholder ratification of, or adding above conditions noted a. and b. to an existing Poison Pill. In such a case, if the company does not take appropriate action prior to the next annual shareholder meeting, FMR will withhold authority on the election of directors.

2. The company refuses, upon request by FMR, to amend the Poison Pill to allow Fidelity to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a company's total voting securities and of any class of voting securities.

3. Within the last year and without shareholder approval, a company's board of directors or compensation committee has repriced outstanding options, exchanged outstanding options for equity, or tendered cash for outstanding options.

4. The company failed to act in the best interests of shareholders when approving executive compensation, taking into account such factors as: (i) whether the company used an independent compensation committee; (ii) whether the compensation committee engaged independent compensation consultants; (iii) whether the company has admitted to or settled a regulatory proceeding relating to options backdating; (iv) whether the compensation committee has lapsed or waived equity vesting restrictions; and (v) whether the company has adopted or extended a Golden Parachute without shareholder approval.

5. To gain FMR's support on a proposal, the company made a commitment to modify a proposal or practice to conform to the Guidelines and the company has failed to act on that commitment.

6. The director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the board or its committees on which the director served during the company's prior fiscal year, absent extenuating circumstances.

7. The board is not composed of a majority of independent directors.

B. Indemnification

FMR will generally vote in favor of charter and by-law amendments expanding the indemnification of directors and/or limiting their liability for breaches of care unless FMR is otherwise dissatisfied with the performance of management or the proposal is accompanied by Anti-Takeover Provisions.

C. Independent Chairperson

FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending the appointment of a non-executive or independent chairperson. However, FMR will consider voting for such proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, appointment of a non-executive or independent chairperson appears likely to further the interests of shareholders and to promote effective oversight of management by the board of directors.

D. Majority Director Elections

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals calling for directors to be elected by an affirmative majority of votes cast in a board election, provided that the proposal allows for plurality voting standard in the case of contested elections (i.e., where there are more nominees than board seats). FMR may consider voting against such shareholder proposals where a company's board has adopted an alternative measure, such as a director resignation policy, that provides a meaningful alternative to the majority voting standard and appropriately addresses situations where an incumbent director fails to receive the support of a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election.

IV. Compensation

A. Equity award plans (including stock options, restricted stock awards, and other stock awards).

FMR will generally vote against equity award plans or amendments to authorize additional shares under such plans if:

1. (a) The dilution effect of the shares outstanding and available for issuance pursuant to all plans, plus any new share requests is greater than 10% for a Large-Capitalization Company, 15% for a Small-Capitalization Company or 20% for a Micro-Capitalization Company; and (b) there were no circumstances specific to the company or the plans that lead FMR to conclude that the level of dilution in the plan or the amendments is acceptable.

<R> 2. In the case of stock option plans, (a) the offering price of options is less than 100% of fair market value on the date of grant, except that the offering price may be as low as 85% of fair market value if the discount is expressly granted in lieu of salary or cash bonus; (b) the plan's terms allow repricing of underwater options; or (c) the board/committee has repriced options outstanding under the plan in the past two years without shareholder approval.</R>

<R> 3. In the case of stock awards, the restriction period is less than three years for non-performance-based awards, and less than one year for performance-based awards.</R>

<R> 4. The plan includes an Evergreen Provision.</R>

<R> 5. The plan provides for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards even though an actual change in control may not occur.</R>

FMR will consider approving an equity award plan or an amendment to authorize additional shares under such plan if, without complying with the guidelines immediately above, the following two conditions are met:

1. The shares are granted by a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors; and

<R> 2. The shares are limited to 5% (Large-Capitalization Company) and 10% (Small- or Micro-Capitalization Company) of the shares authorized for grant under the plan.</R>

B. Equity Exchanges and Repricing

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of a management proposal to exchange, reprice or tender for cash, outstanding options if the proposed exchange, repricing, or tender offer is consistent with the interests of shareholders, taking into account such factors as:</R>

1. Whether the proposal excludes senior management and directors;

2. Whether the exchange or repricing proposal is value neutral to shareholders based upon an acceptable pricing model;

3. The company's relative performance compared to other companies within the relevant industry or industries;

4. Economic and other conditions affecting the relevant industry or industries in which the company competes; and

5. Any other facts or circumstances relevant to determining whether an exchange or repricing proposal is consistent with the interests of shareholders.

C. Employee Stock Purchase Plans

<R> FMR will generally vote in favor of employee stock purchase plans if the minimum stock purchase price is equal to or greater than 85% of the stock's fair market value and the plan constitutes a reasonable effort to encourage broad based participation in the company's equity. In the case of non-U.S. company stock purchase plans, FMR may permit a lower minimum stock purchase price equal to the prevailing "best practices" in the relevant non-U.S. market, provided that the minimum stock purchase price must be at least 75% of the stock's fair market value.</R>

D. Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)

FMR will generally vote in favor of non-leveraged ESOPs. For leveraged ESOPs, FMR may examine the company's state of incorporation, existence of supermajority vote rules in the charter, number of shares authorized for the ESOP, and number of shares held by insiders. FMR may also examine where the ESOP shares are purchased and the dilution effect of the purchase. FMR will generally vote against leveraged ESOPs if all outstanding loans are due immediately upon change in control.

E. Executive Compensation

FMR will generally vote against management proposals on stock-based compensation plans or other compensation plans if such proposals are inconsistent with the interests of shareholders, taking into account such factors as: (i) whether the company has an independent compensation committee; and (ii) whether the compensation committee has authority to engage independent compensation consultants.

F. Bonus Plans and Tax Deductibility Proposals

FMR will generally vote in favor of cash and stock incentive plans that are submitted for shareholder approval in order to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, provided that the plan includes well defined and appropriate performance criteria, and with respect to any cash component, that the maximum award per participant is clearly stated and is not unreasonable or excessive.

V. Anti-Takeover Provisions

FMR will generally vote against a proposal to adopt or approve the adoption of an Anti-Takeover Provision unless:

A. The Poison Pill includes the following features:

1. A Sunset Provision of no greater than five years;

2. Linked to a business strategy that is expected to result in greater value for the shareholders;

3. Requires shareholder approval to be reinstated upon expiration or if amended;

4. Contains a Permitted Bid Feature; and

5. Allows the Fidelity Funds to hold an aggregate position of up to 20% of a company's total voting securities and of any class of voting securities.

B. An Anti-Greenmail proposal that does not include other Anti-Takeover Provisions; or

C. It is a fair price amendment that considers a two-year price history or less.

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals to eliminate Anti-Takeover Provisions. In the case of proposals to declassify a board of directors, FMR will generally vote against such a proposal if the issuer's Articles of Incorporation or applicable statutes include a provision whereby a majority of directors may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by written consent, or other reasonable procedures, by a majority of shareholders entitled to vote for the election of directors.

VI. Capital Structure/Incorporation

A. Increases in Common Stock

FMR will generally vote against a provision to increase a company's common stock if such increase will result in a total number of authorized shares greater than three times the current number of outstanding and scheduled to be issued shares, including stock options, except in the case of real estate investment trusts, where an increase that will result in a total number of authorized shares up to five times the current number of outstanding and scheduled to be issued shares is generally acceptable.

B. New Classes of Shares

FMR will generally vote against the introduction of new classes of stock with differential voting rights.

C. Cumulative Voting Rights

FMR will generally vote against the introduction and in favor of the elimination of cumulative voting rights.

D. Acquisition or Business Combination Statutes

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposed amendments to a company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws that enable the company to opt out of the control shares acquisition or business combination statutes.

E. Incorporation or Reincorporation in Another State or Country

FMR will generally vote against shareholder proposals calling for or recommending that a portfolio company reincorporate in the United States and vote in favor of management proposals to reincorporate in a jurisdiction outside the United States if (i) it is lawful under United States, state and other applicable law for the company to be incorporated under the laws of the relevant foreign jurisdiction and to conduct its business and (ii) reincorporating or maintaining a domicile in the United States would likely give rise to adverse tax or other economic consequences detrimental to the interests of the company and its shareholders. However, FMR will consider supporting such shareholder proposals and opposing such management proposals in limited cases if, based upon particular facts and circumstances, reincorporating in or maintaining a domicile in the relevant foreign jurisdiction gives rise to significant risks or other potential adverse consequences that appear reasonably likely to be detrimental to the interests of the company or its shareholders.

VII. Shares of Investment Companies

<R> A. When a Fidelity Fund invests in an underlying Fidelity Fund with public shareholders, an exchange traded fund (ETF), or non-affiliated fund, FMR will vote in the same proportion as all other voting shareholders of such underlying fund or class ("echo voting"). FMR may choose not to vote if "echo voting" is not operationally feasible.</R>

B. Certain Fidelity Funds may invest in shares of underlying Fidelity Funds which are held exclusively by Fidelity Funds or accounts managed by an FMR or an affiliate. FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals recommended by the underlying funds' Board of Trustees.

VIII. Other

A. Voting Process

FMR will generally vote in favor of proposals to adopt confidential voting and independent vote tabulation practices.

B. Regulated Industries

Voting of shares in securities of any regulated industry (e.g. U.S. banking) organization shall be conducted in a manner consistent with conditions that may be specified by the industry's regulator (e.g. the Federal Reserve Board) for a determination under applicable law (e.g. federal banking law) that no fund or group of funds has acquired control of such organization.

To view a fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, visit www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.

DISTRIBUTION SERVICES

The fund has entered into a distribution agreement with FDC, an affiliate of FMR. The principal business address of FDC is 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. FDC is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. The distribution agreement calls for FDC to use all reasonable efforts, consistent with its other business, to secure purchasers for shares of the fund, which are continuously offered at NAV. Promotional and administrative expenses in connection with the offer and sale of shares are paid by FMR.

The Trustees have approved Distribution and Service Plans on behalf of Institutional Class and Service Class (the Plans) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act (the Rule). The Rule provides in substance that a mutual fund may not engage directly or indirectly in financing any activity that is primarily intended to result in the sale of shares of the fund except pursuant to a plan approved on behalf of the fund under the Rule. The Plans, as approved by the Trustees, allow Institutional Class and Service Class and FMR to incur certain expenses that might be considered to constitute direct or indirect payment by the fund of distribution expenses.

The Rule 12b-1 Plan adopted for Service Class of the fund is described in the prospectus for that class.

The table below shows the service fees paid for Service Class of the fund for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010.

<R>

Service
Fees
Paid to
FDC
Service Fees
Paid by
FDC to
Intermediaries
Service
Fees
Retained by
FDC
</R>

<R>Service Class

$ 7,410

$ 7,368

$ 42*</R>

<R>* Amounts retained by FDC represent fees paid to FDC but not yet reallowed to intermediaries as of the close of the period reported and fees paid to FDC that are not eligible to be reallowed to intermediaries. Amounts not eligible for reallowance are retained by FDC for use in its capacity as distributor.</R>

Under the Institutional Class Plan, if the payment of management fees by the fund to FMR is deemed to be indirect financing by the fund of the distribution of its shares, such payment is authorized by the Plan. The Institutional Class Plan specifically recognizes that FMR may use its management fee revenue, as well as its past profits or its other resources, to pay FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of Institutional Class shares and/or shareholder support services. In addition, the Institutional Class Plan provides that FMR, directly or through FDC, may pay significant amounts to intermediaries, including banks, broker-dealers, and other service-providers (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees has authorized such payments for Institutional Class shares.

Under the Service Class Plan, if the payment of management fees by the fund to FMR is deemed to be indirect financing by the fund of the distribution of its shares, such payment is authorized by the Plan. The Service Class Plan specifically recognizes that FMR may use its management fee revenue, as well as its past profits or its other resources, to pay FDC for expenses incurred in connection with providing services intended to result in the sale of Service Class shares and/or shareholder support services, including payments of significant amounts made to intermediaries, including banks, broker-dealers, and other service-providers (who may be affiliated with FMR or FDC), that provide those services. Currently, the Board of Trustees has authorized such payments for Service Class shares.

Prior to approving each Plan, the Trustees carefully considered all pertinent factors relating to the implementation of the Plan, and determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plan will benefit the applicable class of the fund and its shareholders. In particular, the Trustees noted that the Institutional Class Plan does not authorize payments by Institutional Class of the fund other than those made to FMR under its management contract with the fund. To the extent that each Plan gives FMR and FDC greater flexibility in connection with the distribution of class shares, additional sales of class shares or stabilization of cash flows may result. Furthermore, certain shareholder support services may be provided more effectively under the Plans by local entities with whom shareholders have other relationships.

The Service Class Plan does not provide for specific payments by Service Class of any of the expenses of FDC, or obligate FDC or FMR to perform any specific type or level of distribution activities or incur any specific level of expense in connection with distribution activities.

FDC or an affiliate may compensate, or upon direction make payments for certain retirement plan expenses to, intermediaries, including banks, broker-dealers, retirement plan sponsors, administrators, and service-providers (including affiliates of FDC). A number of factors are considered in determining whether to pay these additional amounts. Such factors may include, without limitation, the level or type of services provided by the intermediary, the level or expected level of assets or sales of shares, the placing of the fund on a preferred or recommended fund list, access to an intermediary's personnel, and other factors. In addition to such payments, FDC or an affiliate may offer other incentives such as sponsorship of educational or client seminars relating to current products and issues, assistance in training and educating the intermediaries' personnel, payments or reimbursements for travel and related expenses associated with due diligence trips that an intermediary may undertake in order to explore possible business relationships with affiliates of FDC, and/or payments of costs and expenses associated with attendance at seminars, including travel, lodging, entertainment, and meals. FDC anticipates that payments will be made to over a hundred intermediaries, including some of the largest broker-dealers and other financial firms, and certain of the payments described above may be significant to an intermediary. As permitted by SEC and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority rules and other applicable laws and regulations, FDC or an affiliate may pay or allow other incentives or payments to intermediaries.

If you have purchased shares of the fund through an investment professional, please speak with your investment professional to learn more about any payments his or her firm may receive from FMR, FDC, and/or their affiliates, as well as fees and/or commissions the investment professional charges. You should also consult disclosures made by your investment professional at the time of purchase.

Any of the payments described in this section may represent a premium over payments made by other fund families. Investment professionals may have an added incentive to sell or recommend a fund or a share class over others offered by competing fund families, or retirement plan sponsors may take these payments into account when deciding whether to include a fund as a plan investment option.

TRANSFER AND SERVICE AGENT AGREEMENTS

The fund has entered into a transfer agent agreement with Citibank, N.A. (Citibank), which is located at 111 Wall Street, New York, New York. Under the terms of the agreement, Citibank provides transfer agency services for each class of the fund. Citibank in turn has entered into a sub-transfer agent agreement with FIIOC, an affiliate of FMR, which is located at 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. Under the terms of the sub-agreement, FIIOC performs all processing activities associated with providing these services for each class of the fund and receives all related transfer agency fees paid to Citibank.

For providing transfer agency services, FIIOC receives an asset-based fee, calculated and paid monthly on the basis of each class's average daily net assets, with respect to each account in the fund.

FIIOC also may collect fees charged in connection with providing certain types of services such as exchanges, closing out fund balances, maintaining fund positions with low balances, checkwriting, wire transactions, and providing historical account research.

FIIOC bears the expense of typesetting, printing, and mailing prospectuses, statements of additional information, and all other reports, notices, and statements to existing shareholders, with the exception of proxy statements.

Retirement plans may also hold fund shares in the name of the plan or its trustee, rather than the plan participant. In situations where FIIOC or an affiliate does not provide recordkeeping services, plan recordkeepers, who may have affiliated financial intermediaries who sell shares of the fund, may, upon direction, be paid for providing recordkeeping services to plan participants. Payments may also be made, upon direction, for other plan expenses. FIIOC may also pay an affiliate for providing services that otherwise would have been performed by FIIOC.

The fund has also entered into a service agent agreement with Citibank. Under the terms of the agreement, Citibank provides pricing and bookkeeping services for the fund. Citibank in turn has entered into a sub-service agent agreement with Fidelity Service Company, Inc. (FSC), an affiliate of FMR. Under the terms of the sub-agreement, FSC performs all processing activities associated with providing these services, including calculating the NAV and dividends for each class of the fund and maintaining the fund's portfolio and general accounting records, and receives all related pricing and bookkeeping fees paid to Citibank.

For providing pricing and bookkeeping services, FSC receives a monthly fee based on the fund's average daily net assets throughout the month.

FMR bears the cost of pricing and bookkeeping services under the terms of its management contract with the fund.

DESCRIPTION OF THE TRUST

Trust Organization. Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund is a fund of Fidelity California Municipal Trust II, an open-end management investment company created under an initial trust instrument dated June 20, 1991. On August 15, 2005, Spartan® California Municipal Money Market Fund changed its name from Spartan California Municipal Money Market Fund to Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund. Currently, there are two funds offered in the trust: Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund and Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund. The Trustees are permitted to create additional funds in the trust and to create additional classes of the fund.

The assets of the trust received for the issue or sale of shares of each fund and all income, earnings, profits, and proceeds thereof, subject to the rights of creditors, are allocated to such fund, and constitute the underlying assets of such fund. The underlying assets of each fund in the trust shall be charged with the liabilities and expenses attributable to such fund, except that liabilities and expenses may be allocated to a particular class. Any general expenses of the trust shall be allocated between or among any one or more of the funds or classes.

Shareholder Liability. The trust is a statutory trust organized under Delaware law. Delaware law provides that, except to the extent otherwise provided in the Trust Instrument, shareholders shall be entitled to the same limitations of personal liability extended to stockholders of private corporations for profit organized under the general corporation law of Delaware. The courts of some states, however, may decline to apply Delaware law on this point. The Trust Instrument contains an express disclaimer of shareholder liability for the debts, liabilities, obligations, and expenses of the trust. The Trust Instrument provides that the trust shall not have any claim against shareholders except for the payment of the purchase price of shares and requires that each agreement, obligation, or instrument entered into or executed by the trust or the Trustees relating to the trust or to a fund shall include a provision limiting the obligations created thereby to the trust or to one or more funds and its or their assets. The Trust Instrument further provides that shareholders of a fund shall not have a claim on or right to any assets belonging to any other fund.

The Trust Instrument provides for indemnification out of each fund's property of any shareholder or former shareholder held personally liable for the obligations of the fund solely by reason of his or her being or having been a shareholder and not because of his or her acts or omissions or for some other reason. The Trust Instrument also provides that each fund shall, upon request, assume the defense of any claim made against any shareholder for any act or obligation of the fund and satisfy any judgment thereon. Thus, the risk of a shareholder incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to circumstances in which Delaware law does not apply, no contractual limitation of liability was in effect, and a fund is unable to meet its obligations. FMR believes that, in view of the above, the risk of personal liability to shareholders is extremely remote. Claims asserted against one class of shares may subject holders of another class of shares to certain liabilities.

Voting Rights. Each fund's capital consists of shares of beneficial interest. As a shareholder, you are entitled to one vote for each dollar of net asset value you own. The voting rights of shareholders can be changed only by a shareholder vote. Shares may be voted in the aggregate, by fund, and by class.

The shares have no preemptive or conversion rights. Shares are fully paid and nonassessable, except as set forth under the heading "Shareholder Liability" above.

The trust or a fund or a class may be terminated upon the sale of its assets to, or merger with, another open-end management investment company, series, or class thereof, or upon liquidation and distribution of its assets. The Trustees may reorganize, terminate, merge, or sell all or a portion of the assets of the trust or a fund or a class without prior shareholder approval. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of the trust, shareholders of each of its funds are entitled to receive the underlying assets of such fund available for distribution. In the event of the dissolution or liquidation of a fund or a class, shareholders of that fund or that class are entitled to receive the underlying assets of the fund or class available for distribution.

Custodian. Citibank, N.A., 111 Wall Street, New York, New York, is custodian of the assets of the fund. The custodian is responsible for the safekeeping of a fund's assets and the appointment of any subcustodian banks and clearing agencies.

FMR, its officers and directors, its affiliated companies, and Members of the Board of Trustees may, from time to time, conduct transactions with various banks, including banks serving as custodians for certain funds advised by FMR. Transactions that have occurred to date include mortgages and personal and general business loans. In the judgment of FMR, the terms and conditions of those transactions were not influenced by existing or potential custodial or other fund relationships.

<R>Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 125 High Street, Boston, Massachusetts, independent registered public accounting firm, examines financial statements for the fund and provides other audit, tax, and related services.</R>

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The fund's financial statements and financial highlights for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010, and report of the independent registered public accounting firm, are included in the fund's annual report and are incorporated herein by reference. Total annual operating expenses as shown in the prospectus fee table may differ from the ratios of expenses to average net assets in the financial highlights because total annual operating expenses as shown in the prospectus fee table include any acquired fund fees and expenses, whereas the ratios of expenses in the financial highlights do not. Acquired funds include other investment companies (such as central funds or other underlying funds) in which the fund has invested, if and to the extent it is permitted to do so. Total annual operating expenses in the prospectus fee table and the financial highlights do not include any expenses associated with investments in certain structured or synthetic products that may rely on the exception from the definition of "investment company" provided by section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act.

FUND HOLDINGS INFORMATION

The fund views holdings information as sensitive and limits its dissemination. The Board authorized FMR to establish and administer guidelines for the dissemination of fund holdings information, which may be amended at any time without prior notice. FMR's Disclosure Policy Committee (comprising executive officers of FMR) evaluates disclosure policy with the goal of serving the fund's best interests by striking an appropriate balance between providing information about the fund's portfolio and protecting the fund from potentially harmful disclosure. The Board reviews the administration and modification of these guidelines and receives reports from the fund's chief compliance officer periodically.

<R>The fund will provide a full list of holdings as of the end of the fund's fiscal quarter on www.advisor.fidelity.com 60 days after its fiscal quarter-end. The fund's full holdings are also available monthly, 15 or more days after month-end by calling Fidelity at 1-877-208-0098.</R>

This information will be available on the web site until updated for the next applicable period.

The fund may from time to time make full holdings available more frequently, including daily, if such disclosure is determined by FMR to be in the interest of fund shareholders. The fund may also from time to time provide or make available to third parties upon request specific fund level performance attribution information and statistics, or holdings information with respect to a specific security or company. Third parties may include fund shareholders or prospective fund shareholders, members of the press, consultants, and ratings and ranking organizations.

The Use of Holdings In Connection With Fund Operations. Material non-public holdings information may be provided as part of the investment activities of the fund to: entities which, by explicit agreement or by virtue of their respective duties to the fund, are required to maintain the confidentiality of the information disclosed; other parties if legally required; or persons FMR believes will not misuse the disclosed information. These entities, parties, and persons include: the fund's trustees; the fund's manager, its sub-advisers and their affiliates whose access persons are subject to a code of ethics; contractors who are subject to a confidentiality agreement; the fund's auditors; the fund's custodians; proxy voting service providers; financial printers; pricing service vendors; broker-dealers in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or requests for price quotations or bids on one or more securities; securities lending agents; counsel to the fund or its Independent Trustees; regulatory authorities; stock exchanges and other listing organizations; parties to litigation; and third-parties in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding relating to a fund holding. Non-public holdings information may also be provided to an issuer regarding the number or percentage of its shares that are owned by a fund and in connection with redemptions in kind.

Other Uses Of Holdings Information. In addition, the fund may provide material non-public holdings information to (i) third-parties that calculate information derived from holdings for use by FMR or its affiliates, (ii) third parties that supply their analyses of holdings (but not the holdings themselves) to their clients (including sponsors of retirement plans or their consultants), (iii) ratings and rankings organizations, and (iv) an investment adviser, trustee, or their agents to whom holdings are disclosed for due diligence purposes or in anticipation of a merger involving the fund. Each individual request is reviewed by the Disclosure Policy Committee which must find, in its sole discretion that, based on the specific facts and circumstances, the disclosure appears unlikely to be harmful to the fund. Entities receiving this information must have in place control mechanisms to reasonably ensure or otherwise agree that, (a) the holdings information will be kept confidential, (b) no employee shall use the information to effect trading or for their personal benefit, and (c) the nature and type of information that they, in turn, may disclose to third-parties is limited. FMR relies primarily on the existence of non-disclosure agreements and/or control mechanisms when determining that disclosure is not likely to be harmful to the fund.

At this time, the entities receiving information described in the preceding paragraph are: Factset Research Systems Inc. (full or partial fund holdings daily, on the next business day); Thomson Vestek (full holdings, as of the end of the calendar quarter, 15 calendar days after the calendar quarter-end); Standard & Poor's Rating Services (full holdings weekly (generally as of the previous Friday), generally 5 business days thereafter); Moody's Investors Service (full holdings monthly, (generally as of the last Friday of each month), generally the first Friday of the following month); Anacomp Inc. (full or partial holdings daily, on the next business day); and MSCI Inc. and certain affiliates (full or partial fund holdings daily, on the next business day).

FMR, its affiliates, or the fund will not enter into any arrangements with third-parties from which they derive consideration for the disclosure of material non-public holdings information. If, in the future, FMR desired to make such an arrangement, it would seek prior Board approval and any such arrangements would be disclosed in the fund's SAI.

There can be no assurance that the fund's policies and procedures with respect to disclosure of fund portfolio holdings will prevent the misuse of such information by individuals and firms that receive such information.

APPENDIX

Fidelity, Fidelity Investments & (Pyramid) Design, and Spartan are registered trademarks of FMR LLC.

The third party marks appearing above are the marks of their respective owners.

Fidelity California Municipal Trust II
Post-Effective Amendment No. 36

PART C. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 28. Exhibits

(a) (1) Amended and Restated Trust Instrument, dated July 18, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (a)(1) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 23.

(2) Certificate of Amendment of the Trust Instrument, dated March 24, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (a)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 25.

(b) Bylaws of the Trust, as amended and dated April 23, 2009, are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (b) of Fidelity Oxford Street Trust's (File No. 002-77909) Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(c) Not applicable.

(d) (1) Management Contract, dated August 1, 2007, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(1) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 32.

(2) Management Contract, dated August 1, 2001, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Spartan California Municipal Money Market Fund (currently known as Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 23.

(3) Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated December 30, 1991, between FMR Texas Inc. (currently known as Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc.) and Fidelity Management & Research Company on behalf of Fidelity California Tax-Free Money Market Portfolio (currently known as Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 5(c) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 11.

(4) Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated April 18, 1994, between FMR Texas Inc. (currently known as Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc.) and Fidelity Management & Research Company on behalf of Spartan California Municipal Money Market Portfolio (currently known as Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 5(d) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 11.

(5) Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated September 9, 2008, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited, on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(34) of Fidelity Income Fund's (File No. 002-92661) Amendment No. 75.

(6) Schedule A, dated April 1, 2010, to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated September 9, 2008, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited, on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(6) of Fidelity California Municipal Trust's (File No. 002-83367) Amendment No. 58.

(7) Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated September 29, 2008, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc., on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(36) of Fidelity Income Fund's (File No. 002-92661) Amendment No. 75.

(8) Schedule A, dated April 1, 2010, to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated September 29, 2008, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc., on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(8) of Fidelity California Municipal Trust's (File No. 002-83367) Amendment No. 58.

(9) Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated June 19, 2008, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc., on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(32) of Fidelity Income Fund's (File No. 002-92661) Post-Effective Amendment No. 74.

(10) Schedule A, dated April 1, 2010, to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, dated June 19, 2008, between Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc., on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(10) of Fidelity California Municipal Trust's (File No. 002-83367) Post-Effective Amendment No. 58.

(11) Amended and Restated Master International Fixed-Income Research Agreement, dated August 1, 2007, between Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (currently known as FIL Investment Advisors), on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(40) of Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust's (File No. 002-41839) Post-Effective Amendment No. 113.

(12) Schedule A, dated September 28, 2009, to the Amended and Restated Master International Fixed-Income Research Agreement, dated August 1, 2007, between Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (currently known as FIL Investment Advisors), on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(55) of Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust's (File No. 002-41839) Post-Effective Amendment No. 128.

(13) Amended and Restated Fixed-Income Sub-Research Agreement, dated August 1, 2007, between Fidelity International Investment Advisors (currently known as FIL Investment Advisors) and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited (currently known as FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd.), on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(42) of Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust's (File No. 002-41839) Post-Effective Amendment No. 113.

(14) Schedule A, dated July 16, 2009, to the Amended and Restated Fixed-Income Sub-Research Agreement, dated August 1, 2007, between Fidelity International Investment Advisors (currently known as FIL Investment Advisors) and Fidelity International Investment Advisors (U.K.) Limited (currently known as FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd.), on behalf of the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(41) of Fidelity Income Fund's (File No. 002-92661) Post-Effective Amendment No. 79.

(15) General Research Services Agreement and Schedule B, each dated January 20, 2006, among Fidelity Management & Research Company, FMR Co., Inc., Fidelity Investments Money Management Inc., and Fidelity Research & Analysis Company, on behalf of the Registrant, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(38) of Variable Insurance Products Fund's (File No. 002-75010) Post-Effective Amendment No. 62.

(16) Schedule A, dated April 1, 2010, to the General Research Services Agreement, dated January 20, 2006, among Fidelity Management & Research Company, FMR Co., Inc., Fidelity Investments Money Management Inc., and Fidelity Research & Analysis Company, on behalf of the Registrant, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d)(16) of Fidelity California Municipal Trust's (File No. 002-83367) Post-Effective Amendment No. 58.

(e) (1) Amended and Restated General Distribution Agreement, dated May 1, 2006, between Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund and Fidelity Distributors Corporation is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(1) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(2) Amended and Restated General Distribution Agreement, dated May 1, 2006, between Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund and Fidelity Distributors Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(3) Form of Selling Dealer Agreement (most recently revised April 2006) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(3) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 29.

(4) Form of Bank Agency Agreement (most recently revised April 2006) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(5) Form of Selling Dealer Agreement for Bank-Related Transactions (most recently revised April 2006) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (e)(5) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(f) Amended and Restated Fee Deferral Plan of the Non-Interested Person Trustees of the Fidelity Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds, effective as of September 15, 1995, as amended and restated through January 1, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (f) of Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust's (File No. 002-41839) Post-Effective Amendment No. 137.

(g) (1) Custodian Agreement and Appendix C, D, and E, dated January 1, 2007, between Citibank, N.A. and the Registrant are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(5) of Fidelity Securities Fund's (File No. 002-93601) Post-Effective Amendment No. 73.

(2) Appendix A, dated May 5, 2009, to the Custodian Agreement dated January 1, 2007, between Citibank, N.A. and the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(5) of Fidelity Summer Street Trust's (File No. 002-58542) Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(3) Appendix B, dated April 15, 2009, to the Custodian Agreement dated January 1, 2007, between Citibank, N.A. and the Registrant is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(6) of Fidelity Summer Street Trust's (File No. 002-58542) Post-Effective Amendment No. 78.

(4) Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among The Bank of New York (currently known as The Bank of New York Mellon), J. P. Morgan Securities, Inc., and the Registrant, dated February 12, 1996, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(d) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (currently known as Fidelity Colchester Street Trust) (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(5) Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between The Bank of New York (currently known as The Bank of New York Mellon) and the Registrant, dated February 12, 1996, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(e) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (currently known as Fidelity Colchester Street Trust) (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(6) Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement among Chemical Bank, Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., and the Registrant, dated November 13, 1995, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(f) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (currently known as Fidelity Colchester Street Trust) (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(7) Schedule 1 to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreement between Chemical Bank and the Registrant, dated November 13, 1995, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(g) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (currently known as Fidelity Colchester Street Trust) (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(8) Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York (currently known as The Bank of New York Mellon) and the Registrant dated May 11, 1995, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(h) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (currently known as Fidelity Colchester Street Trust) (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(9) First Amendment to Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement between The Bank of New York (currently known as The Bank of New York Mellon) and the Registrant, dated July 14, 1995, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(i) of Fidelity Institutional Cash Portfolios' (currently known as Fidelity Colchester Street Trust) (File No. 002-74808) Post-Effective Amendment No. 31.

(10) Schedule A-1, Part I and Part IV, dated December 2008, to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreements, Schedule 1s to the Fidelity Group Repo Custodian Agreements, Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement, and First Amendment to the Joint Trading Account Custody Agreement, between the respective parties and the Registrant, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (g)(10) of Fidelity Trend Fund's (File No. 002-15063) Post-Effective Amendment No. 122.

(h) 35 Basis Point Expense Contract, dated April 1, 2007, between Fidelity California Municipal Trust II on behalf of Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund and Fidelity Management & Research Company is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (h) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 34.

(i) Legal Opinion of Dechert LLP, dated April 26, 2010, is filed herein as Exhibit (i).

(j) Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, dated April 23, 2010, is filed herein as Exhibit (j).

(k) Not applicable.

(l) Not applicable.

(m) (1) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Fidelity California Municipal Money Market Fund is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(1) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 20.

(2) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Spartan California Municipal Money Market Fund (currently known as Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund) is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(2) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 20.

(3) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Institutional Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(3) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 30.

(4) Distribution and Service Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund: Service Class is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (m)(4) of Post-Effective Amendment No. 30.

(n) (1) Multiple Class of Shares Plan pursuant to Rule 18f-3 for Fidelity State-Specific AMT Tax-Free Money Market Funds, dated March 18, 2009,on behalf of Fidelity California Municipal Trust II on behalf of Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (n)(1) of Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust's (File No. 002-41839) Post-Effective Amendment No. 123.

(2) Schedule I (Fixed-Income), dated January 20, 2010, to the Multiple Class of Shares Plan pursuant to Rule 18f-3 for Fidelity State-Specific AMT Tax-Free Money Market Funds, on behalf of Fidelity California Municipal Trust II on behalf of Fidelity California AMT Tax-Free Money Market Fund is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (n)(2) of Fidelity California Municipal Trust's (File No. 002-83367) Post-Effective Amendment No. 57.

(p) (1) Code of Ethics, dated 2010, adopted by each fund and Fidelity Management & Research Company, Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc., FMR Co., Inc., Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited, Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc., Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc., Fidelity Research & Analysis Company, and Fidelity Distributors Corporation pursuant to Rule 17j-1 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (p)(1) of Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust's (File N0o. 033-43529) Post-Effective Amendment No. 112.

(2) Code of Ethics, dated February 2010, adopted by FIL Limited, FIL Investment Advisors, and FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd. pursuant to Rule 17j-1 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (p)(2) of Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust's (File No. 002-41839) Post-Effective Amendment No. 137.

Item 29. Trusts Controlled by or under Common Control with this Trust

The Board of Trustees of the Trust is the same as the board of other Fidelity funds, each of which has Fidelity Management & Research Company, or an affiliate, as its investment adviser. In addition, the officers of the Trust are substantially identical to those of the other Fidelity funds. Nonetheless, the Trust takes the position that it is not under common control with other Fidelity funds because the power residing in the respective boards and officers arises as the result of an official position with the respective trusts.

Item 30. Indemnification

Pursuant to Del. Code Ann. title 12 § 3817, a Delaware statutory trust may provide in its governing instrument for the indemnification of its officers and trustees from and against any and all claims and demands whatsoever. Article X, Section 10.02 of the Trust Instrument sets forth the reasonable and fair means for determining whether indemnification shall be provided to any past or present Trustee or officer. It states that the Trust shall indemnify any present or past trustee or officer to the fullest extent permitted by law against liability, and all expenses reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding in which he or she is involved by virtue of his or her service as a trustee or officer and against any amount incurred in settlement thereof. Indemnification will not be provided to a person adjudged by a court or other adjudicatory body to be liable to the Trust or its shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his or her duties (collectively, "disabling conduct"), or not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her action was in the best interest of the Trust. In the event of a settlement, no indemnification may be provided unless there has been a determination, as specified in the Trust Instrument, that the officer or trustee did not engage in disabling conduct.

Pursuant to Section 11 of the Distribution Agreement, the Trust agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Distributor and each of its directors and officers and each person, if any, who controls the Distributor within the meaning of Section 15 of the 1933 Act against any loss, liability, claim, damages or expense (including the reasonable cost of investigating or defending any alleged loss, liability, claim, damages, or expense and reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) arising by reason of any person acquiring any shares, based upon the ground that the registration statement, Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information, shareholder reports or other information filed or made public by the Trust (as from time to time amended) included an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated or necessary in order to make the statements not misleading under the 1933 Act, or any other statute or the common law. However, the Trust does not agree to indemnify the Distributor or hold it harmless to the extent that the statement or omission was made in reliance upon, and in conformity with, information furnished to the Trust by or on behalf of the Distributor. In no case is the indemnity of the Trust in favor of the Distributor or any person indemnified to be deemed to protect the Distributor or any person against any liability to the Issuer or its security holders to which the Distributor or such person would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under this Agreement.

Pursuant to the agreement by which Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. ("FIIOC") is appointed sub-transfer agent, the Transfer Agent agrees to indemnify FIIOC for FIIOC's losses, claims, damages, liabilities and expenses (including reasonable counsel fees and expenses) (losses) to the extent that the Transfer Agent is entitled to and receives indemnification from the Fund for the same events. Under the Transfer Agency Agreement, the Trust agrees to indemnify and hold the Transfer Agent harmless against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities, or expenses (including reasonable counsel fees and expenses) resulting from:

(1) any claim, demand, action or suit brought by any person other than the Trust, including by a shareholder, which names the Transfer Agent and/or the Trust as a party and is not based on and does not result from the Transfer Agent's willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of duties, and arises out of or in connection with the Transfer Agent's performance under the Transfer Agency Agreement; or

(2) any claim, demand, action or suit (except to the extent contributed to by the Transfer Agent's willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence or reckless disregard of its duties) which results from the negligence of the Trust, or from the Transfer Agent's acting upon any instruction(s) reasonably believed by it to have been executed or communicated by any person duly authorized by the Trust, or as a result of the Transfer Agent's acting in reliance upon advice reasonably believed by the Transfer Agent to have been given by counsel for the Trust, or as a result of the Transfer Agent's acting in reliance upon any instrument or stock certificate reasonably believed by it to have been genuine and signed, countersigned or executed by the proper person.

Item 31. Business and Other Connections of Investment Advisers

(1) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY (FMR)

FMR serves as investment adviser to a number of other investment companies. The directors and officers of the Adviser have held, during the past two fiscal years, the following positions of a substantial nature.

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Chairman of the Board and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR), FMR Co., Inc. (FMRC), Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC), and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM); Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, and Director of FMR LLC; Chairman and Director of FIL Limited. Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Peter S. Lynch

Vice Chairman and Director of FMR and FMRC and a member of the Advisory Board of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Jacques P. Perold

President of FMR (2009); President and Director of FIMM (2009).

 

 

Timothy J. Barrett

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR LLC, FMR U.K., FIMM, FRAC, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

James C. Curvey

Director of FMR, FMRC, FIMM (2009), and FRAC (2009); Director and Vice Chairman of FMR LLC; Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Scott C. Goebel

Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of FMR and FMRC (2008); Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., and FRAC (2008); Chief Legal Officer of Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.) (2008).

 

 

Boyce I. Greer

Executive Vice President of FMR; President and Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2008). Previously served as Executive Vice President of FMRC (2009) and as President and Director of FIMM (2009).

 

 

Joseph A. Hanlon

Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

 

 

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR H.K. (2008) and FMR Japan (2008).

 

 

John J. Remondi

Director of FMR, FMRC, FRAC (2009), and FIMM (2009); Director and Executive Vice President (2008) of FMR LLC; Previously served as Chief Administrative Officer (2009) of FMR LLC.

 

 

Peter D. Stahl

Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers Inc., and FDC (2008).

 

 

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, FMR LLC, and FMR Japan (2008); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR LLC.

 

 

JS Wynant

Senior Vice President and Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FRAC and FIMM (2008); Director and Treasurer of FMR U.K. and FMR Japan (2008); Treasurer of FMR H.K. (2008). Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2008).

(2) FMR CO., INC. (FMRC)

FMRC provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Chairman of the Board and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR), FMR Co., Inc. (FMRC), Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC), and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM); Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, and Director of FMR LLC; Chairman and Director of FIL Limited. Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Brian B. Hogan

President of FMRC (2009).

 

 

Peter S. Lynch

Vice Chairman and Director of FMR and FMRC and member of the Advisory Board of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Timothy J. Barrett

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR LLC, FMR U.K., FIMM, FRAC, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

James C. Curvey

Director of FMR, FMRC, FIMM (2009), and FRAC (2009); Director and Vice Chairman of FMR LLC; Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Scott C. Goebel

Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of FMR and FMRC (2008); Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., and FRAC (2008); Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K. (2008).

 

 

Joseph A. Hanlon

Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR H.K. (2008) and FMR Japan (2008).

 

 

John J. Remondi

Director of FMR, FMRC, FRAC (2009), and FIMM (2009); Director and Executive Vice President (2008) of FMR LLC; Previously served as Chief Administrative Officer (2009) of FMR LLC.

 

 

Peter D. Stahl

Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers Inc., and FDC (2008).

 

 

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, FMR LLC, and FMR Japan (2008); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR LLC.

 

 

JS Wynant

Senior Vice President and Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FRAC and FIMM (2008); Director and Treasurer of FMR U.K. and FMR Japan (2008); Treasurer of FMR H.K. (2008). Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2008).

(3) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (HONG KONG) LIMITED (FMR H.K.)

FMR H.K. provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Mark X. Burns

Director, Executive Director, and Head of Office of FMR H.K. (2008).

 

 

Markus Eichacker

Director (2010) and Managing Director of Research (2009) of FMR H.K.

 

 

Scott C. Goebel

Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of FMR and FMRC (2008); Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., and FRAC (2008); Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K. (2008).

 

 

Joseph A. Hanlon

Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR H.K. (2008) and FMR Japan (2008).

 

 

Matthew C. Torrey

Director and Managing Director of Research of FMR Japan (2008) and FMR U.K.; Director and Managing Director of Research (2008) of FMR H.K.

 

 

JS Wynant

Senior Vice President and Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FRAC and FIMM (2008); Director and Treasurer of FMR U.K. and FMR Japan (2008); Treasurer of FMR H.K. (2008). Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2008).

 

 

Sharon Yau Wong

Director; Director of Investment Services-Asia of FMR H.K. (2008).

 

 

Tricor Corporate Secretary Limited

Secretary of FMR H.K.

(4) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (JAPAN) INC. (FMR JAPAN)

FMR Japan provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Scott C. Goebel

Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of FMR and FMRC (2008); Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., and FRAC (2008); Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K. (2008).

 

 

Joseph A. Hanlon

Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR H.K. (2008) and FMR Japan (2008).

 

 

Peter D. Stahl

Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers Inc., and FDC (2008).

 

 

Takeya Suzuki

Managing Director of Research, Japan of FMR Japan (2009).

 

 

Matthew C. Torrey

Director and Managing Director of Research of FMR Japan (2008) and FMR U.K.; Director and Managing Director of Research (2008) of FMR H.K.

 

 

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, FMR LLC, and FMR Japan (2008); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR LLC.

 

 

JS Wynant

Senior Vice President and Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FRAC and FIMM (2008); Director and Treasurer of FMR U.K. and FMR Japan (2008); Treasurer of FMR H.K. (2008). Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2008).

(5) FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH (U.K.) INC. (FMR U.K.)

FMR U.K. provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Management Trust Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Christopher Sullivan

Executive Vice President of FIMM (2009); Director of FMR U.K. (2010).

 

 

Robert P. Brown

Director and Managing Director of Research of FMR U.K. (2008); Executive Vice President of FIMM (2010).

 

 

Timothy J. Barrett

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR LLC, FMR U.K., FIMM, FRAC, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

Lawrence J. Brindisi

Director, Executive Director and Executive Vice President of FMR U.K.

 

 

Scott C. Goebel

Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of FMR and FMRC (2008); Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., and FRAC (2008); Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K. (2008).

 

 

David Hamlin

Managing Director of Research of FMR U.K. (2008).

 

 

Joseph A. Hanlon

Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

John B. McHale

Managing Director of Research of FMR U.K. (2009).

 

 

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR H.K. (2008) and FMR Japan (2008).

 

 

Peter D. Stahl

Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers Inc., and FDC (2008).

 

 

Matthew C. Torrey

Director and Managing Director of Research of FMR Japan (2008) and FMR U.K.; Director and Managing Director of Research (2008) of FMR H.K.

 

 

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, FMR LLC, and FMR Japan (2008); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR LLC.

 

 

JS Wynant

Senior Vice President and Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FRAC and FIMM (2008); Director and Treasurer of FMR U.K. and FMR Japan (2008); Treasurer of FMR H.K. (2008). Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2008).

(6) FIDELITY RESEARCH & ANALYSIS COMPANY (FRAC)

FRAC provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company, Fidelity Management Trust Company, FMR Co., Inc., and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Chairman of the Board and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR), FMR Co., Inc. (FMRC), Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC), and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM); Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, and Director of FMR LLC; Chairman and Director of FIL Limited. Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

James C. Curvey

Director of FMR, FMRC, FIMM (2009), and FRAC (2009); Director and Vice Chairman of FMR LLC; Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Timothy J. Barrett

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR LLC, FMR U.K., FIMM, FRAC, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

Scott C. Goebel

Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of FMR and FMRC (2008); Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., and FRAC (2008); Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K. (2008).

 

 

Joseph A. Hanlon

Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR H.K. (2008) and FMR Japan (2008).

 

 

John J. Remondi

Director of FMR, FMRC, FRAC (2009), and FIMM (2009); Director and Executive Vice President (2008) of FMR LLC; Previously served as Chief Administrative Officer (2009) of FMR LLC.

 

 

Peter D. Stahl

Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers Inc., and FDC (2008).

 

 

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, FMR LLC, and FMR Japan (2008); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR LLC.

 

 

JS Wynant

Senior Vice President and Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FRAC and FIMM (2008); Director and Treasurer of FMR U.K. and FMR Japan (2008); Treasurer of FMR H.K. (2008). Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2008).

(7) FIDELITY INVESTMENTS MONEY MANAGEMENT, INC. (FIMM)

FIMM provides investment advisory services to Fidelity Management & Research Company. The directors and officers of the Sub-Adviser have held the following positions of a substantial nature during the past two fiscal years.

Edward C. Johnson 3d

Chairman of the Board and Director of Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR), FMR Co., Inc. (FMRC), Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC), and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM); Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, and Director of FMR LLC; Chairman and Director of FIL Limited. Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Jacques P. Perold

President of FMR (2009); President and Director of FIMM (2009).

 

 

Robert P. Brown

Director and Managing Director of Research of FMR U.K. (2008); Executive Vice President of FIMM (2010).

 

 

Timothy J. Barrett

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR LLC, FMR U.K., FIMM, FRAC, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

James C. Curvey

Director of FMR, FMRC, FIMM (2009), and FRAC (2009); Director and Vice Chairman of FMR LLC; Trustee of funds advised by FMR.

 

 

Scott C. Goebel

Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of FMR and FMRC (2008); Assistant Secretary of FIMM, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., and FRAC (2008); Chief Legal Officer of FMR H.K. (2008).

 

 

Joseph A. Hanlon

Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, FMR H.K., FMR Japan, and Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2009).

 

 

Kenneth A. Rathgeber

Chief Compliance Officer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FMR H.K. (2008) and FMR Japan (2008).

 

 

John J. Remondi

Director of FMR, FMRC, FRAC (2009), and FIMM (2009); Director and Executive Vice President (2008) of FMR LLC; Previously served as Chief Administrative Officer (2009) of FMR LLC.

 

 

Peter D. Stahl

Assistant Secretary of FMR, FMRC, FMR Japan, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers Inc., and FDC (2008).

 

 

Christopher Sullivan

Executive Vice President of FIMM (2009); Director of FMR U.K. (2010).

 

 

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FMR U.K., FRAC, FIMM, Strategic Advisers, Inc., FDC, FMR LLC, and FMR Japan (2008); Vice President, Taxation, of FMR LLC.

 

 

JS Wynant

Senior Vice President and Treasurer of FMR, FMRC, FRAC and FIMM (2008); Director and Treasurer of FMR U.K. and FMR Japan (2008); Treasurer of FMR H.K. (2008). Previously served as Vice President of FMR and FMRC (2008).

(8) FIL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (FIIA)

The directors and officers of FIIA have held, during the past two fiscal years, the following positions of a substantial nature.

David J. Saul

President (2009) and Director of FIIA.

 

 

Lori Blackwood

Chief Compliance Officer of FIIA (2008).

 

 

John Ford

Director of FIIA (2009); Executive Officer (2010) and Director of FIJ.

 

 

Frank Mutch

Director of FIIA.

 

 

Allan Pelvang

Director and Vice President of FIIA.

 

 

Rosalie Powell

Company Secretary of FIIA (2009).

 

 

Robert Stewart

Director of FIIA.

 

 

Elizabeth Hickmott

Assistant Secretary of FIIA (2009).

 

 

Natalie Trusler

Assistant Secretary of FIIA.

 

 

Andrew Wells

Director of FIIA.

(9) FIL INVESTMENT ADVISORS (U.K.) LTD. (FIIA(U.K.)L)

The directors and officers of FIIA(U.K.)L have held, during the past two fiscal years, the following positions of a substantial nature.

Andrew Morris

Director (2008) and Chief Compliance Officer of FIIA(U.K.)L.

 

 

Doug Naismith

Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and Director of FIIA(U.K.)L (2008).

 

 

Nicky Richards

Director of FIIA(U.K.)L.

 

 

Andrew Steward

Director of FIIA(U.K.)L (2008). Previously served as Chief Administration Officer of FIIA(U.K.)L (2008).

 

 

FIL Administration Ltd.

Secretary of FIIA(U.K.)L.

Principal business addresses of the investment adviser, sub-advisers and affiliates.

Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

FMR Co., Inc. (FMRC)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (FMR H.K.)
Floor 19, 41 Connaught Road Central
Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Inc. (FMR Japan)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (FMR U.K.)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Research & Analysis Company (FRAC)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

FIL Investment Advisors (FIIA)
Pembroke Hall
42 Crow Lane
Pembroke HM19, Bermuda

FIL Investment Advisors (U.K.) Ltd. (FIIA(U.K.)L)
Oakhill House,
130 Tonbridge Road,
Hildenborough, TN119DZ, United Kingdom

FIL Investments (Japan) Limited (FIJ)
Shiroyama Trust Tower
4-3-1, Toranomon, Minato-ku,
Tokyo, Japan 105-6019

Strategic Advisers, Inc.
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

FMR LLC
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109

Item 32. Principal Underwriters

(a) Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) acts as distributor for all funds advised by FMR or an affiliate.

(b)

 

 

Name and Principal

Positions and Offices

Positions and Offices

Business Address*

with Underwriter

with Fund

Thomas G. Coogan

Director and President (2009)

None

Susan Boudrot

Chief Compliance Officer

None

Jane Greene

Treasurer and Controller

None

Natalie Kavanaugh

Chief Legal Officer (2010)

None

William F. Loehning

Executive Vice President

None

Peter D. Stahl

Assistant Secretary (2008)

None

J. Gregory Wass

Assistant Treasurer

None

* 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA

(c) Not applicable.

Item 33. Location of Accounts and Records

All accounts, books, and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the 1940 Act and the Rules promulgated thereunder are maintained by Fidelity Management & Research Company or Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc., 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, MA 02109, or the funds' custodian, Citibank, N.A., 111 Wall Street, New York, NY.

Item 34. Management Services

Not applicable.

Item 35. Undertakings

Not applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for the effectiveness of this Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this Post-Effective Amendment No. 36 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boston, and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 28th day of April 2010.

 

Fidelity California Municipal Trust II

 

By

/s/John R. Hebble

 

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

 

John R. Hebble, President

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

(Signature)

 

(Title)

(Date)

 

 

 

 

/s/John R. Hebble

 

President and Treasurer

April 28, 2010

John R. Hebble

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Christine Reynolds

 

Chief Financial Officer

April 28, 2010

Christine Reynolds

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Abigail P. Johnson

 

Trustee

April 28, 2010

Abigail P. Johnson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/James C. Curvey

*

Trustee

April 28, 2010

James C. Curvey

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Robert F. Gartland

*

Trustee

April 28, 2010

Robert F. Gartland

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Albert R. Gamper

*

Trustee

April 28, 2010

Albert R. Gamper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Arthur E. Johnson

*

Trustee

April 28, 2010

Arthur E. Johnson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Michael E. Kenneally

*

Trustee

April 28, 2010

Michael E. Kenneally

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/James H. Keyes

*

Trustee

April 28, 2010

James H. Keyes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Marie L. Knowles

*

Trustee

April 28, 2010

Marie L. Knowles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Kenneth L. Wolfe

*

Trustee

April 28, 2010

Kenneth L. Wolfe

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* By: /s/Joseph R. Fleming
Joseph R. Fleming, pursuant to a power of attorney dated March 17, 2010 and filed herewith.

POWER OF ATTORNEY


We, the undersigned Directors or Trustees, as the case may be, of the following investment companies:

 

Fidelity Aberdeen Street Trust

Fidelity Advisor Series II

Fidelity Advisor Series IV

Fidelity Boylston Street Trust

Fidelity California Municipal Trust

Fidelity California Municipal Trust II

Fidelity Central Investment Portfolios II LLC

Fidelity Charles Street Trust

Fidelity Colchester Street Trust

Fidelity Court Street Trust

Fidelity Court Street Trust II

Fidelity Fixed-Income Trust

Fidelity Garrison Street Trust

Fidelity Hereford Street Trust

Fidelity Income Fund

 

Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Trust

Fidelity Money Market Trust

Fidelity Municipal Trust

Fidelity Municipal Trust II

Fidelity Newbury Street Trust

Fidelity New York Municipal Trust

Fidelity New York Municipal Trust II

Fidelity Oxford Street Trust

Fidelity Phillips Street Trust

Fidelity Revere Street Trust

Fidelity School Street Trust

Fidelity Union Street Trust

Fidelity Union Street Trust II

Variable Insurance Products Fund V

in addition to any other investment company for which Fidelity Management & Research Company ("FMR") or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and for which the undersigned individuals serve as Directors or Trustees (collectively, the "Funds"), hereby revoke all previous powers of attorney we have given to sign and otherwise act in our names and behalf in matters involving any investment company for which FMR or an affiliate acts as investment adviser and hereby constitute and appoint Joseph R. Fleming, John V. O'Hanlon, Robert W. Helm and Anthony H. Zacharski, each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, and with full power to each of them, to sign for us and in our names in the appropriate capacities, all Registration Statements of the Funds on Form N-1A, Form N-8A, Form N-14, or any successors thereto, any and all subsequent Amendments, Pre-Effective Amendments, or Post-Effective Amendments to said Registration Statements or any successors thereto, and any supplements or other instruments in connection therewith, and generally to do all such things in our names and behalf in connection therewith as said attorneys-in-fact deem necessary or appropriate, to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, and all related requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys-in-fact or their substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney is effective for all documents filed on or after March 17, 2010.

WITNESS our hands on this 17th day of March 2010.

/s/James C. Curvey

/s/Michael E. Kenneally

James C. Curvey

 

 

 

Michael E. Kenneally

/s/Albert R. Gamper

/s/James H. Keyes

Albert R. Gamper

 

 

 

James H. Keyes

/s/Robert F. Gartland

/s/Marie L. Knowles

Robert F. Gartland

 

 

 

Marie L. Knowles

/s/Arthur E. Johnson

/s/Kenneth L. Wolfe

Arthur E. Johnson

 

 

 

Kenneth L. Wolfe