Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jul. 30, 2011
Contingencies [Abstract]
CONTINGENCIES	11. CONTINGENCIES In October 2010, the Company became aware that a third-party it had contracted with as its agent to receive, monitor and pay utility bills for the Company’s properties was delinquent in its payment of the Company’s utility bills, despite timely receipt of funds from the Company. On November 3, 2010, the Company filed suit against this third-party agent, Utility Account Billing Services, Inc., and its affiliate Synergy Energy Holdings, LLC, in Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Erie. In June 2011, summary judgment was granted in favor of the Company for the full amount of the claim of $3,117, and the Company has initiated efforts to collect on that judgment. Additionally, the Company filed a claim with one of its insurance carriers, and in July 2011 entered into a settlement agreement with the insurance carrier, payment for which has been received. Per the settlement agreement, the insurance carrier will be reimbursed by the Company for collections from the judgment that exceed the difference between the full amount of the claim under the lawsuit and the insurance payment received. The Company is party to legal proceedings and claims that arise during the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate outcome of any such litigation and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jul. 30, 2011

11. CONTINGENCIES

In October 2010, the Company became aware that a third-party it had contracted with as its agent to receive, monitor and pay utility bills for the Company’s properties was delinquent in its payment of the Company’s utility bills, despite timely receipt of funds from the Company. On November 3, 2010, the Company filed suit against this third-party agent, Utility Account Billing Services, Inc., and its affiliate Synergy Energy Holdings, LLC, in Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Erie. In June 2011, summary judgment was granted in favor of the Company for the full amount of the claim of $3,117, and the Company has initiated efforts to collect on that judgment. Additionally, the Company filed a claim with one of its insurance carriers, and in July 2011 entered into a settlement agreement with the insurance carrier, payment for which has been received. Per the settlement agreement, the insurance carrier will be reimbursed by the Company for collections from the judgment that exceed the difference between the full amount of the claim under the lawsuit and the insurance payment received.

The Company is party to legal proceedings and claims that arise during the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate outcome of any such litigation and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.