4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2022

4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, which has defined the fair value of financial instruments as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs.

The accounting guidance also expands the disclosure requirements around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels, which is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are described below:

Level 1 Inputs that are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets

Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly

Level 3 Prices or valuation that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

In valuing assets and liabilities, the Company is required to maximize the use of quoted market prices and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company calculated the fair value of its Level 1 and 2 instruments based on the exchange traded price of similar or identical instruments where available or based on other observable instruments. These calculations take into consideration the credit risk of both the Company and its counterparties. The Company has not changed its valuation techniques in measuring the fair value of any financial assets and liabilities during the period.

The fair value of the contingent consideration obligations was based on a probability weighted approach derived from the estimates of earn-out criteria and the probability assessment with respect to the likelihood of achieving those criteria. The measurement was based on significant inputs that were not observable in the market, therefore, the Company classified this liability as Level 3 in the following tables.

The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2022 and 2021 according to the valuation techniques the Company used to determine their fair values:

	Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2022
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,971,100	$	-	$	-	$	2,971,100
Investment securities		5,276,600		1,115,000		-		6,391,600
Total	$	8,247,700	$	1,115,000	$	-	$	9,362,700
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

	Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2021
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,675,200	$	-	$	-	$	9,675,200
Investment securities		2,920,600		824,000		-		3,744,600
Total	$	12,595,800	$	824,000	$	-	$	13,419,800
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration	$	-	$	-	$	160,000	$	160,000

Investments in marketable securities by security type as of June 30, 2022 and 2021 consisted of the following:

As of June 30, 2022:	Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Holding Gain (Loss)
Equity securities	$	118,800	$	151,000	$	32,200
Mutual funds		5,299,500		5,125,600		(173,900	)
Debt Securities		1,114,100		1,115,000		900
Total	$	6,532,400	$	6,391,600	$	(140,800	)

As of June 30, 2021:	Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Holding Gain (Loss)
Equity securities	$	102,200	$	154,100	$	51,900
Mutual funds		2,752,400		2,766,500		14,100
Debt Securities		832,700		824,000		(8,700	)
Total	$	3,687,300		3,744,600	$	57,300

The following table sets forth an analysis of changes during the years ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, in Level 3 financial liabilities of the Company’s contingent obligation which require cash payments to the sellers of certain acquired operations based on royalty payments received. As of June 30, 2022, the contingent consideration obligation was finalized to $117,500, of which $98,800 was paid to the sellers and $18,700 remains unpaid and reclassified into accounts payable.

	As of June 30,
	2022			2021
Beginning balance	$	160,000		$	358,000
Decrease in fair value of contingent consideration liability		(42,500	)		(30,000	)
Payments		(117,500	)		(168,000	)
Ending balance	$	-		$	160,000