XML 66 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Income Taxes
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
INCOME TAXES
INCOME TAXES
The Company’s net unrecognized tax benefits totaled approximately $61.3 million and $63.8 million as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. All amounts included in the balance at September 30, 2014 for tax positions would affect the annual effective tax rate. The Company has $0.6 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties as of September 30, 2014.
The Company and one or more of its subsidiaries is subject to federal income taxes in the United States, as well as income taxes of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2011.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) concluded its field examination of the Company's 2009 and 2010 tax years and issued proposed adjustments primarily related to transfer pricing and the research and development tax credit. In June 2014, the Company finalized its tax deficiency calculations and formally closed the audit with the IRS for the 2009 and 2010 tax years. As a result, the Company recognized a net tax benefit related to the settlement of all tax issues with the IRS for the 2009 and 2010 tax years, the impact on subsequent years and the reduction of the Company’s uncertain tax positions for the closed tax years of $9.3 million during the second quarter of 2014.
In the ordinary course of global business, there are transactions for which the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain; thus, judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes. The Company provides for income taxes on transactions based on its estimate of the probable liability. The Company adjusts its provision as appropriate for changes that impact its underlying judgments. Changes that impact provision estimates include such items as jurisdictional interpretations on tax filing positions based on the results of tax audits and general tax authority rulings. Due to the evolving nature of tax rules combined with the large number of jurisdictions in which the Company operates, it is possible that the Company’s estimates of its tax liability and the realizability of its deferred tax assets could change in the future, which may result in additional tax liabilities and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The Company is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates as part of the process of preparing its condensed consolidated financial statements. At September 30, 2014, the Company had approximately $140.4 million in net deferred tax assets. The authoritative guidance requires a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company reviews deferred tax assets periodically for recoverability and makes estimates and judgments regarding the expected geographic sources of taxable income and gains from investments, as well as tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.

The Company maintains certain strategic management and operational activities in overseas subsidiaries and its foreign earnings are taxed at rates that are generally lower than in the United States. The Company does not expect to remit earnings from its foreign subsidiaries. The Company’s effective tax rate was approximately 1.4% and 15.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively and 6.9% and 11.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate when comparing the three months ended September 30, 2014 to the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to the change in the combination of income between the Company's U.S. and foreign operations. The decrease in the effective tax rate when comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to the impact of the IRS settlement for the tax years 2009 and 2010 that closed during the three months ended June 30, 2014.
In July 2013, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that provides explicit guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. Under the new standard, the Company's unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2014, and as of September 30, 2014 the Company is offsetting unrecognized tax benefits of $1.7 million against short-term deferred tax assets and $28.7 million against long-term deferred tax assets.
The Company’s effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to lower tax rates on earnings generated by the Company’s foreign operations that are taxed primarily in Switzerland. The Company has not provided for U.S. taxes for those earnings because it plans to reinvest all of those earnings indefinitely outside the United States.