XML 52 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Loss Reserves
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Loss Reserves [Abstract]  
Loss Reserves
Note 12 – Loss Reserves

We establish reserves to recognize the estimated liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) related to defaults on insured mortgage loans. Loss reserves are established by estimating the number of loans in our inventory of delinquent loans that will result in a claim payment, which is referred to as the claim rate, and further estimating the amount of the claim payment, which is referred to as claim severity.

Estimation of losses is inherently judgmental. The conditions that affect the claim rate and claim severity include the current and future state of the domestic economy, including unemployment, and the current and future strength of local housing markets. Current conditions in the housing and mortgage industries make these assumptions more volatile than they would otherwise be. The actual amount of the claim payments may be substantially different than our loss reserve estimates. Our estimates could be adversely affected by several factors, including a deterioration of regional or national economic conditions, including unemployment, leading to a reduction in borrowers’ income and thus their ability to make mortgage payments, and a drop in housing values that could result in, among other things, greater losses on loans that have pool insurance, and may affect borrower willingness to continue to make mortgage payments when the value of the home is below the mortgage balance. Changes to our estimates could result in a material impact to our results of operations and capital position, even in a stable economic environment.

The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending loss reserves for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
 
 
2014
  
2013
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
 
  
 
Reserve at beginning of period
 
$
3,061,401
  
$
4,056,843
 
Less reinsurance recoverable
  
64,085
   
104,848
 
Net reserve at beginning of period
  
2,997,316
   
3,951,995
 
 
        
Losses incurred:
        
Losses and LAE incurred in respect of default notices related to:
        
Current year
  
155,982
   
268,793
 
Prior years (1)
  
(33,374
)
  
(2,585
)
Subtotal
  
122,608
   
266,208
 
 
        
Losses paid:
        
Losses and LAE paid in respect of default notices related to:
        
Current year
  
314
   
246
 
Prior years
  
342,669
   
468,933
 
Reinsurance terminations (2)
  
-
   
(3,145
)
Subtotal
  
342,983
   
466,034
 
 
        
Net reserve at end of period (3)
  
2,776,941
   
3,752,169
 
Plus reinsurance recoverables
  
57,618
   
96,179
 
 
        
Reserve at end of period
 
$
2,834,559
  
$
3,848,348
 

(1)A negative number for prior year losses incurred indicates a redundancy of prior year loss reserves and a positive number for prior year losses incurred indicates a deficiency of prior year loss reserves.
(2)In a termination, the reinsurance agreement is cancelled, with no future premium ceded and funds for any incurred but unpaid losses transferred to us. The transferred funds result in an increase in our investment portfolio (including cash and cash equivalents) and a decrease in net losses paid (reduction to losses incurred). In addition, there is an offsetting decrease in the reinsurance recoverable (increase in losses incurred), and thus there is no net impact to losses incurred.
(3)At March 31, 2014 and 2013, the estimated reduction in loss reserves related to rescissions approximated $70 million and $0.2 billion, respectively.

The “Losses incurred” section of the table above shows losses incurred on default notices received in the current year and in prior years.  The amount of losses incurred relating to default notices received in the current year represents the estimated amount to be ultimately paid on such default notices.  The amount of losses incurred relating to default notices received in prior years represents the actual claim rate and severity associated with those defaults notices resolved in the current year differing from the estimated liability at the prior year-end, as well as a re-estimation of amounts to be ultimately paid on defaults remaining in inventory from the end of the prior year.  This re-estimation of the estimated claim rate and estimated severity is the result of our review of current trends in the default inventory, such as percentages of defaults that have resulted in a claim, the amount of the claims, changes in the relative level of defaults by geography and changes in average loan exposure.
 
Losses incurred on default notices received in the current year decreased in the first three months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, primarily due to a decrease in the number of new default notices received, net of cures, as well as a decrease in the estimated claim rate on new and previously received delinquencies.

The prior year development of the reserves in the first three months of 2014 and 2013 is reflected in the table below.

 
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
 
 
2014
  
2013
 
 
 
(In millions)
 
Prior year loss development (1):
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
Decrease in estimated claim rate on primary defaults
 
$
(30
)
 
$
(15
)
Increase in estimated severity on primary defaults
  
5
   
20
 
Change in estimates related to pool reserves, LAE reserves and reinsurance
  
(8
)
  
(8
)
Total prior year loss development
 
$
(33
)
 
$
(3
)

(1) A negative number for prior year loss development indicates a redundancy of prior year loss reserves, and a positive number indicates a deficiency of prior year loss reserves.

The prior year loss development was based on the resolution of approximately 25% and 23% for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively of the prior year default inventory, as well as a re-estimation of amounts to be ultimately paid on defaults remaining in inventory from the end of the prior year and estimated incurred but not reported items from the end of the prior year. In the first three months of 2014 and 2013, we recognized favorable development on our estimated claim rate as we experienced a better cure rate on previously received delinquencies.

The “Losses paid” section of the table above shows the breakdown between claims paid on default notices received in the current year, claims paid on default notices received in prior years and the decrease in losses paid related to terminated reinsurance agreements as noted in footnote (2) of that table. Until a few years ago, it took, on average, approximately twelve months for a default that is not cured to develop into a paid claim. Over the past several years, the average time it takes to receive a claim associated with a default has increased. This is, in part, due to new loss mitigation protocols established by servicers and to changes in some state foreclosure laws that may include, for example, a requirement for additional review and/or mediation processes. It is difficult to estimate how long it may take for current and future defaults that do not cure to develop into paid claims.

The liability associated with our estimate of premiums to be refunded on expected claim payments is accrued for separately at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and approximated $126 million and $131 million, respectively. Separate components of this liability are included in “Other liabilities” and “Premium deficiency reserve” on our consolidated balance sheet. Changes in the liability affect premiums written and earned and change in premium deficiency reserve.

A rollforward of our primary default inventory for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 appears in the table below. The information concerning new notices and cures is compiled from monthly reports received from loan servicers. The level of new notice and cure activity reported in a particular month can be influenced by, among other things, the date on which a servicer generates its report, the number of business days in a month and by transfers of servicing between loan servicers.
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
 
 
2014
  
2013
 
 
 
  
 
Default inventory at beginning of period
  
103,328
   
139,845
 
New Notices
  
23,346
   
27,864
 
Cures
  
(27,318
)
  
(31,122
)
Paids (including those charged to a  deductible or captive)
  
(7,064
)
  
(9,445
)
Rescissions and denials
  
(450
)
  
(532
)
Default inventory at end of period
  
91,842
   
126,610
 

Pool insurance notice inventory decreased from 6,563 at December 31, 2013 to 5,646 at March 31, 2014. The pool insurance notice inventory was 7,890 at March 31, 2013.

The decrease in the primary default inventory experienced during 2014 and 2013 was generally across all markets and all book years. However, the percentage of loans in the inventory that have been in default for 12 or more consecutive months has increased in the first quarter of 2014, as shown in the table below. Historically as a default ages it becomes more likely to result in a claim. The percentage of loans that have been in default for 12 or more consecutive months and the number of loans in our primary claims received inventory have been affected by our suspended rescissions and the resolution of certain of those rescissions discussed below and in Note 5 – “Litigation and Contingencies.”

Aging of the Primary Default Inventory
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
March 31,
  
December 31,
  
March 31,
 
 
 
2014
  
2013
  
2013
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
Consecutive months in default
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
3 months or less
  
14,313
   
16
%
  
18,941
   
18
%
  
17,973
   
14
%
4 - 11 months
  
23,305
   
25
%
  
24,514
   
24
%
  
32,662
   
26
%
12 months or more
  
54,224
   
59
%
  
59,873
   
58
%
  
75,975
   
60
%
 
                        
Total primary default inventory
  
91,842
   
100
%
  
103,328
   
100
%
  
126,610
   
100
%
 
                        
Primary claims received inventory included in ending default inventory (1)
  
 
5,990
   
 
7
 
%
  
 
6,948
   
 
7
 
%
  
 
10,924
   
 
9
 
%

 (1) Our claims received inventory includes suspended rescissions, as we have voluntarily suspended rescissions of coverage related to certain loans that we believed would be included in a potential resolution. As of March 31, 2014, rescissions of coverage on approximately 1,525 loans had been voluntarily suspended.
 
The number of months a loan is in the default inventory can differ from the number of payments that the borrower has not made or is considered delinquent. These differences typically result from a borrower making monthly payments that do not result in the loan becoming fully current. The number of payments that a borrower is delinquent is shown in the table below.

Number of Payments Delinquent

 
 
March 31,
  
December 31,
  
March 31,
 
 
 
2014
  
2013
  
2013
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
3 payments or less
  
23,035
   
25
%
  
28,095
   
27
%
  
28,376
   
23
%
4 - 11 payments
  
22,766
   
25
%
  
24,605
   
24
%
  
32,253
   
25
%
12 payments or more
  
46,041
   
50
%
  
50,628
   
49
%
  
65,981
   
52
%
 
                        
Total primary default inventory
  
91,842
   
100
%
  
103,328
   
100
%
  
126,610
   
100
%

Claims paying practices

We estimate rescissions mitigated our incurred losses by approximately $2.5 billion in 2009 and $0.2 billion in 2010. All of these figures include the benefit of claims not paid in the period as well as the impact of changes in our estimated expected rescission activity on our loss reserves in the period. In 2012, we estimate that our rescission benefit in loss reserves was reduced by $0.2 billion due to probable rescission settlement agreements. We estimate that other rescissions had no significant impact on our losses incurred in 2011 through the first quarter of 2014. At March 31, 2014, we estimate that our total loss reserves were benefited from anticipated rescissions by approximately $70 million. Our loss reserving methodology incorporates our estimates of future rescissions and reversals of rescissions. Historically, reversals of rescissions have been immaterial. A variance between ultimate actual rescission and reversal rates and our estimates, as a result of the outcome of litigation, settlements or other factors, could materially affect our losses.

We do not utilize an explicit rescission rate in our reserving methodology, but rather our reserving methodology incorporates the effects rescission activity has had on our historical claim rate and claim severities. Our estimation process does not include a direct correlation between claim rates and severities to projected rescission activity or other economic conditions such as changes in unemployment rates, interest rates or housing values. Our experience is that analysis of that nature would not produce reliable results, as the change in one condition cannot be isolated to determine its sole effect on our ultimate paid losses as our ultimate paid losses are also influenced at the same time by other economic conditions. The estimation of the impact of rescissions on incurred losses must be considered together with the various other factors impacting incurred losses and not in isolation.

The liability associated with our estimate of premiums to be refunded on expected future rescissions is accrued for separately. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 the estimate of this liability totaled $14 million and $15 million, respectively. Separate components of this liability are included in “Other liabilities” and “Premium deficiency reserve” on our consolidated balance sheet. Changes in the liability affect premiums written and earned and change in premium deficiency reserve.

For information about discussions and legal proceedings with customers with respect to our claims paying practices, including settlements that we believe are probable, as defined in ASC 450-20, see Note 5 – “Litigation and Contingencies.”