XML 93 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Benefit Plans
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Benefit Plans [Abstract]  
Benefit Plans
13.  
Benefit Plans
 
We have a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all domestic employees, as well as a supplemental executive retirement plan. We also offer both medical and dental benefits for retired domestic employees and their spouses under a postretirement benefit plan. The following tables provide the components of aggregate annual net periodic benefit cost, changes in the benefit obligation and the funded status of the pension, supplemental executive retirement and other postretirement benefit plans as recognized in the consolidated balance sheet:
 
   
Pension and Supplemental
  
Other Postretirement
 
   
Executive Retirement Plans
  
Benefits
 
 Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost for fiscal year ending 
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2010
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2010
 
   
(In thousands)
 
1.Company Service Cost $9,662  $8,917  $8,531  $1,226  $1,090  $1,126 
2.Interest Cost  16,481   16,098   15,535   1,144   1,350   1,183 
3.Expected Return on Assets  (18,211)  (17,373)  (14,502)  (3,162)  (3,299)  (2,891)
4.Other Adjustments  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Subtotal  7,932   7,642   9,564   (792)  (859)  (582)
5.Amortization of :                        
a. Net Transition Obligation/(Asset)  -   -   -   -   -   - 
b. Net Prior Service Cost/(Credit)  665   661   650   (6,217)  (6,217)  (6,138)
c. Net Losses/(Gains)  5,829   4,010   5,924   797   632   764 
Total Amortization  6,494   4,671   6,574   (5,420)  (5,585)  (5,374)
6.Net Periodic Benefit Cost  14,426   12,313   16,138   (6,212)  (6,445)  (5,956)
7.Cost of settlements or curtailments  -   -   -   -   -   - 
8.Total Expense for Year $14,426   $12,313   $16,138   $(6,212 ) $(6,445 ) $(5,956 )
 
 
Development of Funded Status
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
   
Pension and Supplemental
  
Other Postretirement
 
   
Executive Retirement Plans
  
Benefits
 
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
 
   
(In thousands)
 
              
Actuarial Value of Benefit Obligations
            
1.Measurement Date 
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
 
2.Accumulated Benefit Obligation $331,985  $297,145  $16,284  $25,007 
                  
Funded Status/Asset (Liability) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
             
                 
1.Projected Benefit Obligation $(362,657) $(318,048) $(16,284) $(25,007)
2.Plan Assets at Fair Value  340,335   305,748   49,391   42,578 
3.Funded Status - Overfunded/Asset  N/A   N/A  $33,107  $17,571 
4.Funded Status - Underfunded/Liability $(22,322) $(12,300)  N/A   N/A 
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
      
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
 
   
(In thousands)
 
1.Net Actuarial (Gain)/Loss $106,661  $95,298  $1,985  $14,109 
2.Net Prior Service Cost/(Credit)  1,775   2,278   (38,587)  (41,072)
3.Net Transition Obligation/(Asset)  -   -   -   - 
4.Total at Year End $108,436  $97,576  $(36,602) $(26,964)
 
Under Statement of Statutory Accounting Principles ("SSAP") No. 92 and No. 102, which became effective January 1, 2013, the measurement of pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities will begin to include non-vested employees. This measurement, referred to as the projected benefit obligation, is the measurement currently used under GAAP, as disclosed in the tables above. The new SSAPs will increase our statutory benefit obligations. We have evaluated the provisions of this guidance, and we do not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on our statutory benefit obligations.
 
The changes in the projected benefit obligation are as follows:
 
   
Pension and Supplemental
  
Other Postretirement
 
   
Executive Retirement Plans
  
Benefits
 
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
 
   
(In thousands)
 
1.Benefit Obligation at Beginning of Year $318,048  $291,456  $25,007  $26,200 
2.Company Service Cost  9,662   8,917   1,226   1,090 
3.Interest Cost  16,481   16,098   1,144   1,350 
4.Plan Participants' Contributions  -   -   356   261 
5.Net Actuarial (Gain)/Loss due to Assumption Changes  37,418   23,037   (6,517)  397 
6.Net Actuarial (Gain)/Loss due to Plan Experience  634   (6,544)  (497)  (3,643)
7.Benefit Payments from Fund (1)  (19,483)  (14,692)  (661)  (560)
8.Benefit Payments Directly by Company  (265)  (316)  (42)  (87)
9.Plan Amendments  162   92   (3,732)  - 
10.Other Adjustment  -   -   -   - 
11.Benefit Obligation at End of Year $362,657  $318,048  $16,284  $25,007 
 
(1) In 2012, includes lump sum payments of $12.0 million from our pension plan to eligible participants, which were former employees with vested benefits of $100 thousand or less. Additional former employees may elect this option in 2013. In 2011, includes lump sum payments of $8.2 million from our pension plan to eligible participants, which were former employees with vested benefits of $50 thousand or less.
 
The changes in the fair value of the net assets available for plan benefits are as follows:
 
Change in Plan Assets
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
 
   
(In thousands)
 
1.Fair Value of Plan Assets at Beginning of Year $305,748  $284,080  $42,578  $44,362 
2.Company Contributions  15,265   20,316   -   - 
3.Plan Participants' Contributions  -   -   356   261 
4.Benefit Payments from Fund  (19,483)  (14,692)  (661)  (560)
5.Benefit Payments paid directly by Company  (265)  (316)  (42)  (87)
6.Actual Return on Assets  39,070   16,360   7,474   (1,224)
7.Other Adjustment  -   -   (314)  (173)
8.Fair Value of Plan Assets at End of Year $340,335  $305,748  $49,391  $42,578 
 
 
   
Pension and Supplemental
  
Other Postretirement
 
 
 
Executive Retirement Plans
  
Benefits
 
Change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)
 
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
 
   
(In thousands)
 
1.AOCI in Prior Year $97,576  $84,649  $(26,964) $(33,827)
2.Increase/(Decrease) in AOCI                
a. Recognized during year - Prior Service (Cost)/Credit  (665)  (661)  6,217   6,217 
b. Recognized during year - Net Actuarial (Losses)/Gains  (5,829)  (4,010)  (797)  (632)
c. Occurring during year - Prior Service Cost  162   92   (3,732)  - 
d. Occurring during year - Net Actuarial Losses/(Gains)  17,192   17,507   (11,326)  1,278 
3.AOCI in Current Year $108,436  $97,576  $(36,602) $(26,964)

 
Amortizations Expected to be Recognized During Next Fiscal Year Ending
 
 
 
 
  12/31/2013     12/31/2013 
   (In thousands) 
1.Amortization of Net Transition Obligation/(Asset)$
-
     $
-
 
2.Amortization of Prior Service Cost/(Credit) 500      
(6,649)
 
3.Amortization of Net Losses/(Gains) 6,063      
-
 
 
The projected benefit obligations, net periodic benefit costs and accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the plans were determined using the following weighted average assumptions.
 
   
Pension and Supplemental
  
Other Postretirement
 
   
Executive Retirement Plans
  
Benefits
 
Actuarial Assumptions
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
 
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine
            
Benefit Obligations at year end            
1.Discount Rate  4.25%  5.25%  3.85%  4.75%
2.Rate of Compensation Increase  3.00%  3.00%  N/A   N/A 
                  
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine
                
Net Periodic Benefit Cost for Year                
1.Discount Rate  5.25%  5.75%  4.75%  5.50%
2.Expected Long-term Return on Plan Assets  6.00%  6.00%  7.50%  7.50%
3.Rate of Compensation Increase  3.00%  3.00%  N/A   N/A 
                  
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates at year end                
1.Health Care Cost Trend Rate Assumed for Next Year  N/A   N/A   7.50%  8.00%
2.Rate to Which the Cost Trend Rate is Assumed to Decline (Ultimate Trend Rate)  N/A   N/A   5.00%  5.00%
3.Year That the Rate Reaches the Ultimate Trend Rate  N/A   N/A   2018   2018 
 
In selecting a discount rate, we performed a hypothetical cash flow bond matching exercise, matching our expected pension plan and postretirement medical plan cash flows, respectively, against a selected portfolio of high quality corporate bonds. The modeling was performed using a bond portfolio of noncallable bonds with at least $50 million outstanding. The average yield of these hypothetical bond portfolios was used as the benchmark for determining the discount rate. In selecting the expected long-term rate of return on assets, we considered the average rate of earnings expected on the classes of funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits of these plans. This included considering the trusts' targeted asset allocation for the year and the expected returns likely to be earned over the next 20 years.
 
The weighted-average asset allocations of the plans are as follows:
 
         
Other Postretirement
 
   
Pension Plan
  
Benefits
 
Plan Assets
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
  
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2011
 
Allocation of Assets at year end            
1.Equity Securities  40%  38%  100%  100%
2.Debt Securities  60%  62%  0%  0%
3.Other  0%  0%  0%  0%
4.Total  100%  100%  100%  100%
 
In accordance with fair value guidance, we applied the following fair value hierarchy in order to measure fair value of our benefit plan assets:
 
Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets that we have the ability to access. Financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include equity securities, mutual funds, money market funds and certain U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies.
 
Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and inputs, other than quoted prices, that are observable in the marketplace for the financial instrument. The observable inputs are used in valuation models to calculate the fair value of the financial instruments. Financial assets utilizing Level 2 inputs include certain municipal, corporate and foreign bonds.
 
Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable. Level 3 inputs reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing an asset or liability. There are no securities that utilize Level 3 inputs.
 
To determine the fair value of securities in Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, independent pricing sources have been utilized. One price is provided per security based on observable market data. To ensure securities are appropriately classified in the fair value hierarchy, we review the pricing techniques and methodologies of the independent pricing sources and believe that their policies adequately consider market activity, either based on specific transactions for the issue valued or based on modeling of securities with similar credit quality, duration, yield and structure that were recently traded. A variety of inputs are utilized by the independent pricing sources including benchmark yields, reported trades, non-binding broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including market research publications. Inputs may be weighted differently for any security, and not all inputs are used for each security evaluation. Market indicators, industry and economic events are also considered. This information is evaluated using a multidimensional pricing model. In addition, on a quarterly basis, we perform quality controls over values received from the pricing source (the "Trustee") which include comparing values to other independent pricing sources. In addition, we review annually the Trustee's auditor's report on internal controls in order to determine that their controls around valuing securities are operating effectively. We have not made any adjustments to the prices obtained from the independent sources.
 
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the pension plan assets at fair value as of December 31, 2012.
 
Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2012
 
              
Pension Plan
 
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Total
 
   
(In thousands)
 
Domestic Mutual Funds
 $45,071  $-  $-  $45,071 
International Mutual Funds
  39,479   -   -   39,479 
Common Stocks
  54,210   -   -   54,210 
Corporate Bonds
  -   130,643   -   130,643 
U.S. Government Securities
  25,859   -   -   25,859 
Municipals
  -   26,595   -   26,595 
Foreign Bonds
  -   17,710   -   17,710 
Foreign Stocks
  768   -   -   768 
Total Assets at fair value
 $165,387  $174,948  $-  $340,335 
 
Our pension plan portfolio is designed to achieve the following objectives over each market cycle and for at least 5 years:
 
Fixed income allocation
 
Protect actuarial benefit payment stream through asset liability matching
Reduce volatility of investment returns compared to actuarial benefit liability
 
Equity allocation
 
Protect long tailed liabilities through the use of equity portfolio
Achieve competitive investment results
 
The primary focus in developing asset allocation ranges for the portfolio is the assessment of the portfolio's investment objectives and the level of risk that is acceptable to obtain those objectives. To achieve these goals the minimum and maximum allocation ranges for fixed income securities and equity securities are:
 
   
Minimum
  
Maximum
 
Fixed income
  40%  100%
Equity
  0%  60%
Cash equivalents
  0%  10%
 
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the postretirement plan assets at fair value as of December 31, 2012.
 
Assets at Fair Value as of December 31, 2012
 
              
Postretirement Plan
 
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
  
Total
 
   
(In thousands)
 
Domestic Mutual Funds
 $34,720  $-  $-  $34,720 
International Mutual Funds
  14,671   -   -   14,671 
Total Assets at fair value
 $49,391  $-  $-  $49,391 
 
Our postretirement plan portfolio is designed to achieve the following objectives over each market cycle and for at least 5 years:
 
Total return should exceed growth in the Consumer Price Index
Achieve competitive investment results
 
The primary focus in developing asset allocation ranges for the portfolio is the assessment of the portfolio's investment objectives and the level of risk that is acceptable to obtain those objectives. To achieve these goals the minimum and maximum allocation ranges for fixed income securities and equity securities are:
 
   
Minimum
  
Maximum
 
Fixed income
  0%  10%
Equity
  90%  100%
 
Given the long term nature of this portfolio and the lack of any immediate need for significant cash flow, it is anticipated that the equity investments will consist of growth stocks and will typically be at the higher end of the allocation ranges above.
 
Investment in international oriented funds is limited to a maximum of 30% of the equity range. The current international allocation is invested in two mutual funds with 5% of the equity allocation in a fund which has the objective of investments primarily in equity securities of emerging markets countries, and 25% of the equity allocation in a fund investing in securities of companies based outside the United States. It invests in companies primarily based in Europe and the Pacific Basin, and includes common and preferred stocks, convertibles, ADRs, EDRs, bonds and cash. In addition to the foreign mutual funds, separately managed accounts have investments in equity securities of foreign corporations, and fixed income securities issued by foreign entities.
 
The following tables show the estimated future contributions and estimated future benefit payments.
 
  Pension and Supplemental  Other Postretirement 
  Executive Retirement Plans  Benefits 
Company Contributions
 
 
  
 
 
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2012
 
   
(In thousands)
 
Company Contributions for the Year Ending:    
1.Current $15,265  $- 
2.Current + 1  1,278   - 
          
 
Benefit Payments (Total)      
   
12/31/2012
  
12/31/2012
 
   
(In thousands)
 
Actual Benefit Payments for the Year Ending:    
1.Current $19,748  $347 
Expected Benefit Payments for the Year Ending:     
2.Current + 1  10,253   670 
3.Current + 2  12,333   764 
4.Current + 3  13,258   782 
5.Current + 4  14,011   831 
6.Current + 5  15,357   932 
7.Current + 6 - 10  97,759   6,880 
 
Health care sensitivities
For measurement purposes, an 8.0% health care trend rate was used for benefits for retirees before they reach age 65 for 2012. In 2013, the rate is assumed to be 7.5%, decreasing to 5.0% by 2018 and remaining at this level beyond.
 
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A 1% change in the health care trend rate assumption would have the following effects on other postretirement benefits:
 
   
1-Percentage
 
1-Percentage
 
   
Point Increase
 
Point Decrease
 
   
(In thousands)
 
        
Effect on total service and interest cost components
 $506  $(401)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
  2,772   (2,121)
 
We have a profit sharing and 401(k) savings plan for employees. At the discretion of the Board of Directors, we may make a contribution of up to 5% of each participant's eligible compensation. We provide a matching 401(k) savings contribution on employees' before-tax contributions at a rate of 80% of the first $1,000 contributed and 40% of the next $2,000 contributed. We recognized expenses related to these plans of $3.1 million, $3.6 million and $3.7 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.