XML 14 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Loss Reserves (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Loss Reserves [Abstract] 
Loss Reserves
The development of the reserves in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010 is reflected in the “Prior years” line in the table above. The $96 million decrease in losses incurred in the first nine months of 2011 was related to defaults that occurred in prior periods. This decrease in losses incurred primarily related to a decrease in the estimated severity on primary defaults which approximated $105 million as well as a decrease in estimated severity on pool defaults which approximated $50 million. The decrease in losses incurred related to prior years was also related to a decrease in estimated loss adjustment expenses which approximated $121 million.  These decreases were offset by an increase in the estimated claim rate on primary defaults which approximated $180 million. The decrease in the severity was based on the resolution of approximately 49% of the prior year default inventory. The decrease in estimated loss adjustment expense was based on recent historical trends in the costs associated with resolving a claim. The increase in the claim rate was also based on the resolution of the prior year default inventory, as well as a re-estimation of amounts to be ultimately paid on defaults remaining in inventory from the end of the prior year and estimated incurred but not reported items from the end of the prior year.

The $304 million decrease in losses incurred in the first nine months of 2010 was related to defaults that occurred in prior periods. This decrease in losses incurred primarily related to a decrease in the claim rate on primary defaults which approximated $355 million. The decrease in the claim rate was based on the resolution of approximately 46% of the prior year default inventory. The decrease in the claim rate was due to greater cures experienced during the first nine months of 2010, a portion of which resulted from loan modifications. The decrease in the claim rate on prior year defaults was offset by an increase in primary severity which approximated $40 million and pool defaults which approximated $60 million. The increase in severity was based on the re-estimation of amounts to be ultimately paid on defaults remaining in inventory from the end of the prior year. The additional decrease in losses incurred related to prior years of approximately $49 million related to LAE reserves and reinsurance.

The “Losses paid” section of the table above shows the breakdown between claims paid on default notices received in the current year and default notices received in prior years. It has historically taken, on average, approximately twelve months for a default which is not cured to develop into a paid claim, therefore, most losses paid relate to default notices received in prior years. Due to a combination of reasons that have slowed the rate at which claims are received and paid, including foreclosure moratoriums and suspensions, servicing delays, court delays, loan modifications, our fraud investigations and our claim rescissions and denials for misrepresentation, it is difficult to estimate how long it may take for current and future defaults that do not cure to develop into paid claims.

The liability associated with our estimate of premiums to be refunded on expected claim payments is accrued for separately at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and approximated $115 million and $113 million, respectively. Separate components of this liability are included in “Other liabilities” and “Premium deficiency reserve” on our consolidated balance sheet. Changes in the liability affect premiums written and earned and change in premium deficiency reserve.