XML 87 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2024
Dec. 31, 2023
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
Disclosure - Pay vs Performance Disclosure
          Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
   
      Average     NASDAQ    
      Summary Average   Computer    
  Summary   Compensation Compensation PRGS Index   Non-GAAP
  Compensation Compensation Table Total Actually Paid Total Total Net Operating
Fiscal Table Total Actually Paid for non-PEO to non-PEO Stockholder Stockholder Income Income
Year for PEO($)(1)(2) to PEO($)(3) NEOs($)(1)(2) NEOs($)(3) Return($)(4) Return($)(4)(5) ($M) ($M)(6)
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i)
2024 10,374,886 9,791,311 2,605,189 2,524,468 172.27 206.32 219.0 298.5
2023 8,635,534 9,246,854 2,380,214 2,526,879 134.31 148.35 194.2 270.6
2022 6,900,213 12,820,362 1,928,895 3,424,464 132.97 102.36 182.8 242.1
2021 6,019,029 13,091,651 2,440,870 4,036,210 120.82 142.39 172.9 229.2
     
Company Selected Measure Name Non-GAAP Operating Income      
Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block] 2023 and 2024: Mr. Gupta served as the PEO for the entirety of 2023 and 2024. The Company’s other NEOs for 2023 and 2024 were: Anthony Folger, John Ainsworth, Loren Jarrett and Sundar Subramanian.      
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block] The TSR Peer Group consists of the NASDAQ Computer Index, an independently prepared index (and which is used for the Company’s stock performance chart in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2024).      
SCT Total [1],[2] $ 10,374,886 $ 8,635,534 $ 6,900,213 $ 6,019,029
Compensation Actually Paid [3] $ 9,791,311 9,246,854 12,820,362 13,091,651
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block]
         
  PEO
Fiscal Year 2021 2022 2023 2024
SCT Total $6,019,029 $6,900,213 $8,635,534 $10,374,886
- Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year ($4,557,407) ($5,642,964) ($7,184,594) ($8,695,919)
+ Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year $5,272,547 $7,164,080 $6,944,482 $6,150,287
+ Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years $5,407,403 $4,351,106 $26,379 $398,911
+ Fair Value at Vesting of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year $452,241 $419,596 $553,066 $761,983
+ Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year $497,837 ($371,669) $271,987 $801,163
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year
Compensation Actually Paid $13,091,651 $12,820,362 $9,246,854 $9,791,311
     
SCT Total [1],[2] $ 2,605,189 2,380,214 1,928,895 2,440,870
Compensation Actually Paid [3] $ 2,524,468 2,526,879 3,424,464 4,036,210
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block]
         
  NEO
Fiscal Year 2021 2022 2023 2024
SCT Total $2,440,870 $1,928,895 $2,380,214 $2,605,189
- Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year ($1,688,435) ($1,282,551) ($1,590,901) ($1,764,843)
+ Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year $1,922,508 $1,628,288 $1,537,748 $1,248,194
+ Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years $1,142,112 $1,115,953 $7,467 $100,546
+ Fair Value at Vesting of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year $105,531 $95,362 $122,452 $154,630
+ Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year $113,625 ($61,483) $69,899 $180,751
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year
Compensation Actually Paid $4,036,210 $3,424,464 $2,526,879 $2,524,468
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return

The following charts provide a description of the relationship between the “Compensation Actually Paid” to the PEO and average of non-PEO NEOs and respective metrics. 

 

 

     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income

 

 

     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure

 

 

     
Tabular List, Table

Tabular List of Financial Performance Measures

 

The following is a list of financial performance measures, which in our assessment represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the NEOs for 2024. Please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a further description of the metrics used in the Company’s executive compensation program.

 

1.Non-GAAP Operating Income – incentivizes profitability and operation efficiency
2.Non-GAAP Revenue – broad topline financial metric incentivizing business development and growth
3.Adjusted Free Cash Flow – reflects disciplined management of the business to generate cash for investment and capital returns
     
Total Shareholder Return Amount [4] $ 172.27 134.31 132.97 120.82
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount [4],[5] 206.32 148.35 102.36 142.39
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Parent $ 219,000,000.0 $ 194,200,000 $ 182,800,000 $ 172,900,000
Company Selected Measure Amount [6] 298,500,000 270,600,000 242,100,000 229,200,000
PEO Name Mr. Gupta      
Additional 402(v) Disclosure

Relationship Between Pay and Performance

 

We believe the “Compensation Actually Paid” in each of the years reported above and over the four-year cumulative period are reflective of the Compensation Committee’s emphasis on “pay-for-performance.” “Compensation Actually Paid” is higher than our Summary Compensation Total figures in each of the first three years presented due to the increased value of performance-based and equity compensation as a result of strong stock price performance. “Compensation Actually Paid” is lower than our Summary Compensation Total figures for 2024 primarily because equity awards granted in 2024 had a lower value at year end than on the date of grant.

     
Peo Grant Date Fair Value Of Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year $ (8,695,919) $ (7,184,594) $ (5,642,964) $ (4,557,407)
Peo Fair Value At Fiscal Year End Of Outstanding And Unvested Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 6,150,287 6,944,482 7,164,080 5,272,547
Peo Change In Fair Value Of Outstanding And Unvested Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Prior Fiscal Years [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 398,911 26,379 4,351,106 5,407,403
Peo Fair Value At Vesting Of Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 761,983 553,066 419,596 452,241
Peo Change In Fair Value As Of Vesting Date Of Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 801,163 271,987 (371,669) 497,837
Peo Fair Value As Of Prior Fiscal Year End Of Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Prior Fiscal Years That Failed To Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year
Non N E O P E O Grant Date Fair Value Of Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year (1,764,843) (1,590,901) (1,282,551) (1,688,435)
Non N E O P E O Fair Value At Fiscal Year End Of Outstanding And Unvested Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 1,248,194 1,537,748 1,628,288 1,922,508
Non N E O P E O Change In Fair Value Of Outstanding And Unvested Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Prior Fiscal Years [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 100,546 7,467 1,115,953 1,142,112
Non N E O P E O Fair Value At Vesting Of Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 154,630 122,452 95,362 105,531
Non N E O P E O Change In Fair Value As Of Vesting Date Of Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 180,751 69,899 (61,483) 113,625
Non N E O P E O Fair Value As Of Prior Fiscal Year End Of Option Awards And Stock Awards Granted In Prior Fiscal Years That Failed To Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
- Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Option Awards and Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year
Measure [Axis]: 1        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
Measure Name Non-GAAP Operating Income      
Non-GAAP Measure Description [Text Block] As noted in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee selected Non-GAAP Operating Income as a key metric for evaluating and rewarding management’s performance in the 2024 incentive program design. This measure is used to determine the payout of 40% of the 2024 corporate bonus plan, as well as 75% of the LTIP (on a three-year aggregated basis), and is aligned with the earnings we have reported to stockholders on a quarterly basis.      
Measure [Axis]: 2        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
Measure Name Non-GAAP Revenue      
Measure [Axis]: 3        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]        
Measure Name Adjusted Free Cash Flow      
[1] Amounts reported in this column represent (i) the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year in which the NEO served as PEO in the case of Mr. Gupta and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for the Company’s other NEOs reported for the applicable year.
[2] The Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and non-PEO NEOs for the applicable years were as follows:
[3] To calculate the compensation actually paid (“CAP”), adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year. A reconciliation of the adjustments for Mr. Gupta and for the average of the other NEOs is set forth following the footnotes to this table.
[4] Pursuant to rules of the SEC, the comparison assumes $100 was invested on November 30, 2020. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
[5] The TSR Peer Group consists of the NASDAQ Computer Index, an independently prepared index (and which is used for the Company’s stock performance chart in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2024).
[6] As noted in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee selected Non-GAAP Operating Income as a key metric for evaluating and rewarding management’s performance in the 2024 incentive program design. This measure is used to determine the payout of 40% of the 2024 corporate bonus plan, as well as 75% of the LTIP (on a three-year aggregated basis), and is aligned with the earnings we have reported to stockholders on a quarterly basis.