XML 58 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Feb. 28, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our financial assets and liabilities at February 28, 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total Fair
Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
42,878

 
$
42,878

 
$

 
$

State and municipal bond obligations
24,129

 

 
24,129

 

Foreign exchange derivatives
(1,798
)
 

 
(1,798
)
 

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
(1,615
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(1,615
)

The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our financial assets and liabilities at November 30, 2014 (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total Fair
Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
67,893

 
$
67,893

 
$

 
$

State and municipal bond obligations
20,186

 

 
20,186

 

Foreign exchange derivatives
(102
)
 

 
(102
)
 

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
(1,717
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(1,717
)


When developing fair value estimates, we maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When available, we use quoted market prices to measure fair value. The valuation technique used to measure fair value for our Level 1 and Level 2 assets is a market approach, using prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets. If market prices are not available, the fair value measurement is based on models that use primarily market based parameters including yield curves, volatilities, credit ratings and currency rates. In certain cases where market rate assumptions are not available, we are required to make judgments about assumptions market participants would use to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument.

We have also classified contingent consideration related to the Rollbase, Inc. (Rollbase) and Modulus LLC (Modulus) acquisitions, which occurred in the second quarter of fiscal years 2013 and 2014, respectively, within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the fair values are derived using significant unobservable inputs, which include discount rates and probability-weighted cash flows. We determined the fair value of our contingent consideration obligations based on a probability-weighted income approach derived from probability assessments of the attainment of certain milestones. We establish discount rates to be utilized in our valuation models based on the cost to borrow that would be required by a market participant for similar instruments. In determining the probability of attaining certain milestones, we utilize data regarding similar milestone events from our own experience. On a quarterly basis, we reassess the probability factors associated with the milestones for our contingent consideration obligations. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these key assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period.

The key assumptions as of February 28, 2015 related to the contingent consideration for the acquisition of Rollbase used in the model are probabilities in excess of 95% that the milestones associated with the contingent consideration will be achieved and a discount rate of 4.8%. The key assumptions as of February 28, 2015 related to the contingent consideration for the acquisition of Modulus used in the model are probabilities in excess of 70% that the milestones associated with the contingent consideration will be achieved and a discount rate of 33.0%. A decrease in the probabilities of achievement could result in a decrease to the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities.

The following table reflects the activity for our liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs for each period presented (in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended
 
February 28,
2015
 
February 28,
2014
Balance, beginning of period
$
1,717

 
$
388

Changes in fair value of contingent consideration obligation
(102
)
 
5

Balance, end of period
$
1,615

 
$
393



We did not have any nonrecurring fair value measurements as of February 28, 2015 and November 30, 2014.