XML 62 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Derivative Instruments [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments

9. Derivative Instruments

The following tables summarize the location and fair values of individual derivative instruments reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Amounts are presented gross of the effect of offsetting balances even where a legal right of offset exists.

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments

 

                         
    Derivative Asset     Derivative Liability  
    Balance Sheet Location   Fair Value     Balance Sheet Location   Fair value  

June 30, 2012

                       

Derivatives held for trading

                       

Credit derivatives

  Derivative assets   $ —       Derivative liabilities   $ 211,617  

Interest rate swaps

  Derivative assets     392,766     Derivative liabilities     180,713  
    Derivative liabilities     582     Derivative assets     259,852  

Currency swaps

  Derivative assets     —       Derivative liabilities     570  

Futures contracts

  Derivative assets     —       Derivative liabilities     1,541  

Other contracts

  Derivative assets     —       Derivative liabilities     180  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total derivatives held for trading

        393,348           654,473  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Call options on long-term debt

  Derivative assets     —       Derivative liabilities     —    

Total non-VIE derivatives

      $ 393,348         $ 654,473  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Variable Interest Entities

                       

Currency swaps

  VIE—Derivative liabilities     —       VIE—Derivative liabilities     85,072  

Interest rate swaps

  VIE—Derivative liabilities     —       VIE—Derivative liabilities     1,978,737  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total VIE derivatives

      $ —           $ 2,063,809  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

December 31, 2011:

                       

Derivatives held for trading

                       

Credit derivatives

  Derivative assets   $ —       Derivative liabilities   $ 190,653  

Interest rate swaps

  Derivative assets     411,652     Derivative liabilities     251,303  
    Derivative liabilities     30,859     Derivative assets     242,500  

Currency swaps

  Derivative assets     —       Derivative liabilities     2,423  

Futures contracts

  Derivative assets     —       Derivative liabilities     627  

Other contracts

  Derivative assets     —       Derivative liabilities     361  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total derivatives held for trading

        442,511           687,867  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Call options on long-term debt

  Derivative assets     6,055     Derivative liabilities     —    
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total non-VIE derivatives

      $ 448,566         $ 687,867  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Variable Interest Entities

                       

Currency swaps

  VIE—Derivative liabilities     27,779     VIE—Derivative liabilities     90,857  

Interest rate swaps

  VIE—Derivative liabilities     —       VIE—Derivative liabilities     2,023,974  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Total VIE derivatives

      $ 27,779         $ 2,114,831  
       

 

 

       

 

 

 

Amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral are not offset against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amounts representing the right to reclaim cash collateral and posted margin, recorded in “Other assets” were $28,455 and $47,421 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The amounts representing the obligation to return cash collateral, recorded in “Other liabilities” were $0 and $0 as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

 

The following tables summarize the location and amount of gains and losses of derivative contracts in the Consolidated Statements of Total Comprehensive Income for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

 

                     
   

Location of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in Consolidated Statements of

Total Comprehensive Income

  Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Consolidated Statements of
Total Comprehensive Income
 
        Three months ended
June 30, 2012
    Three months ended
June 30, 2011
 

Financial Guarantee:

                   

Credit derivatives

 

Net change in fair value of credit derivatives

  $ (7,415   $ 24,287  

Financial Services derivatives products:

                   

Interest rate swaps

  Derivative products     (108,175     (57,952

Currency swaps

  Derivative products     81       (354

Futures contracts

  Derivative products     (16,070     (7,307

Other derivatives

  Derivative products     73       19  
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Financial Services derivative products

        (124,091     (65,594
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Call options on long-term debt

  Other income     39,030       4,045  
       

Variable Interest Entities:

                   

Credit derivatives

 

Income (loss) on variable interest entities

    —         —    

Currency swaps

 

Income (loss) on variable interest entities

    (10,787     (9,970

Interest rate swaps

 

Income (loss) on variable interest entities

    (48,478     (147,350
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Variable Interest Entities

        (59,265     (157,320
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total derivative contracts

      $ (151,741   $ (194,582
       

 

 

   

 

 

 
     
   

Location of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in Consolidated Statements of

Total Comprehensive Income

  Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Consolidated Statements of
Total Comprehensive Income
 
        Six months ended
June 30, 2012
    Six months ended
June 30, 2011
 

Financial Guarantee:

                   

Credit derivatives

 

Net change in fair value of credit derivatives

  $ (14,637   $ 15,384  

Financial Services derivatives products:

                   

Interest rate swaps

  Derivative products     (65,990     (34,260

Currency swaps

  Derivative products     237       (556

Futures contracts

  Derivative products     (11,762     (9,875

Other derivatives

  Derivative products     381       100  
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Financial Services derivative products

        (77,134     (44,591
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Call options on long-term debt

  Other income     100,710       20,770  
       

Variable Interest Entities:

                   

Credit derivatives

 

Income (loss) on variable interest entities

    —         (4,511

Currency swaps

 

Income (loss) on variable interest entities

    (21,994     (22,669

Interest rate swaps

 

Income (loss) on variable interest entities

    45,237       (88,521
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Variable Interest Entities

        23,243       (115,701
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total derivative contracts

      $ 32,182     $ (124,138
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial Guarantee Credit Derivatives:

Credit derivatives, which are privately negotiated contracts, provide the counterparty with credit protection against the occurrence of a specific event such as a payment default or bankruptcy relating to an underlying obligation. Upon a credit event, Ambac is generally required to make payments equal to the difference between the scheduled debt service payment and the actual payment made by the issuer. The majority of our credit derivatives are written on a “pay-as-you-go” basis. Similar to an insurance policy execution, pay-as-you-go provides that Ambac pays interest shortfalls on the referenced transaction as they are incurred on each scheduled payment date, but only pays principal shortfalls upon the earlier of (i) the date on which the assets designated to fund the referenced obligation have been disposed of and (ii) the legal final maturity date of the referenced obligation.

In a small number of transactions, Ambac is required to (i) make a payment equal to the difference between the par value and market value of the underlying obligation or (ii) purchase the underlying obligation at its par value and a loss is realized for the difference between the par and market value of the underlying obligation. There are six transactions, which are not “pay-as-you-go”, with a combined notional of approximately $148,273 and a net liability fair value of $252 as of June 30, 2012. These transactions are primarily in the form of CLOs written between 2002 and 2005. Substantially all of Ambac’s credit derivative contracts relate to structured finance transactions. Credit derivatives issued are insured by Ambac Assurance. None of our outstanding credit derivative transactions at June 30, 2012, include ratings based collateral-posting triggers or otherwise require Ambac to post collateral regardless of Ambac’s ratings or the size of the mark to market exposure to Ambac.

Ambac maintains internal credit ratings on its guaranteed obligations, including credit derivative contracts, solely to indicate management’s view of the underlying credit quality of the guaranteed obligations. Independent rating agencies may have assigned different ratings on the credits in Ambac’s portfolio than Ambac’s internal ratings. The following tables summarize the net par outstanding for CDS contracts, by Ambac rating, for each major category as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

                         

June 30, 2012

Ambac Rating

  CLO     Other     Total  

AAA

  $ 127,730     $ 920,142     $ 1,047,872  

AA

    5,756,517       846,291       6,602,808  

A

    1,702,167       2,755,418       4,457,585  

BBB(1)

    —         485,965       485,965  

Below investment grade (2)

    —         290,186       290,186  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 7,586,414     $ 5,298,002     $ 12,884,416  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
       

December 31, 2011

Ambac Rating

  CLO     Other     Total  

AAA

  $ 297,741     $ 913,857     $ 1,211,598  

AA

    6,193,522       1,248,584       7,442,106  

A

    1,737,314       2,967,445       4,704,759  

BBB(1)

    —         518,142       518,142  

Below investment grade (2)

    —         290,007       290,007  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 8,228,577     $ 5,938,035     $ 14,166,612  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) BBB internal rating reflects bonds which are of medium grade credit quality with adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Certain protective elements and margins may weaken under adverse economic conditions and changing circumstances. These bonds are more likely than higher rated bonds to exhibit unreliable protection levels over all cycles.
(2) Below investment grade (“BIG”) internal ratings reflect bonds which are of speculative grade credit quality with the adequacy of future margin levels for payment of interest and repayment of principal potentially adversely affected by major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse conditions.

 

The tables below summarize information by major category as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

                         
    CLO     Other     Total  
June 30, 2012                  

Number of CDS transactions

    38       22       60  

Remaining expected weighted-average life of obligations (in years)

    2.3       5.8       3.7  

Gross principal notional outstanding

  $ 7,586,414     $ 5,298,002     $ 12,884,416  

Net derivative liabilities at fair value

  $ (51,166   $ (160,451   $ (211,617
       
     CLO     Other     Total  
December 31, 2011                  

Number of CDS transactions

    44       24       68  

Remaining expected weighted-average life of obligations (in years)

    2.7       6.0       4.1  

Gross principal notional outstanding

  $ 8,228,577     $ 5,938,035     $ 14,166,612  

Net derivative liabilities at fair value

  $ (54,320   $ (136,333   $ (190,653

The maximum potential amount of future payments under Ambac’s credit derivative contracts written on a “pay-as-you-go” basis is generally the gross principal notional outstanding amount included in the above table plus future interest payments payable by the derivative reference obligations. For contracts that are not written with pay-as-you-go terms, the maximum potential future payment is represented by the principal notional only. Since Ambac’s credit derivatives typically reference obligations of or assets held by SPEs that meet the definition of a VIE, the amount of maximum potential future payments for credit derivatives is included in the table in Note 5, Special Purpose Entities Including Variable Interest Entities.

Changes in fair value of Ambac’s credit derivative contracts are accounted for at fair value since they do not qualify for the financial guarantee scope exception under ASC Topic 815. Changes in fair value are recorded in “Net change in fair value of credit derivatives” on the Consolidated Statements of Total Comprehensive Income. Although CDS contracts are accounted for at fair value, they are surveilled similar to non-derivative financial guarantee contracts. As with financial guarantee insurance policies, Ambac’s surveillance group tracks credit migration of CDS contracts’ reference obligations from period to period. Adversely classified credits are assigned risk classifications by the surveillance group. As of June 30, 2012, there are four CDS contracts on Ambac’s adversely classified credit listing, with a net derivative liability fair value of $59,423 and total notional principal outstanding of $290,186. As of December 31, 2011 there were four CDS contracts on Ambac’s adversely classified credit listing, with a net derivative liability fair value of $46,056 and a total notional principal outstanding of $290,007.

Financial Services Derivative Products:

Ambac, through its subsidiary Ambac Financial Services (“AFS”), provided interest rate and currency swaps to states, municipalities and their authorities, asset-backed issuers and other entities in connection with their financings. AFS manages its interest rate swaps business with the goal of being market neutral to changes in benchmark interest rates while retaining some basis risk and excess interest rate sensitivity as an economic hedge against the effects of rising interest rates elsewhere in the Company, including on Ambac’s financial guarantee exposures. Basis risk in the portfolio arises primarily from (i) variability in the ratio of benchmark tax-exempt to taxable interest rates, (ii) potential changes in the counterparty bond issuers’ bond-specific variable rates relative to taxable interest rates, and (iii) variability between Treasury and swap rates. The derivative portfolio also includes an unhedged Sterling-denominated exposure to Consumer Price Inflation in the United Kingdom. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the notional amounts of AFS’s trading derivative products are as follows:

 

                 

Type of derivative

  Notional
June 30, 2012
    Notional
December 31, 2011
 

Interest rate swaps—receive-fixed/pay-variable

  $ 978,781     $ 1,370,995  

Interest rate swaps—pay-fixed/receive-variable

    2,094,301       3,798,305  

Interest rate swaps—basis swaps

    175,835       175,835  

Currency swaps

    3,549       13,559  

Futures contracts

    295,000       53,500  

Other contracts

    118,450       118,930  

 

Derivatives of Consolidated Variable Interest Entities

Certain VIEs consolidated under ASC Topic 810 entered into derivative contracts to meet specified purposes within the securitization structure. The notional for VIE derivatives outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

                 
    Notional     Notional  

Type of VIE derivative

  June 30, 2012     December 31, 2011  

Interest rate swaps—receive-fixed/pay-variable

  $ 1,721,100     $ 1,702,113  

Interest rate swaps—pay-fixed/receive-variable

    4,586,220       4,535,626  

Currency swaps

    729,213       721,168  

Credit derivatives

    20,605       20,934  

Call Options on Long-Term Debt

Ambac Assurance had certain contractual options to repurchase $500,000 of its surplus notes at a discount to their par value which were considered stand-alone derivatives. Surplus notes are classified under Long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These call options were exercised in June 2012. The fair value of the options was $6,055 as of December 31,2011 Gains from the change in fair value of the call options were recognized within Other income in the Consolidated Statements of Total Comprehensive Income in the amount of $39,030 and $4,045 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively; and $100,710 and $20,770 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Contingent Features in Derivatives Related to Ambac Credit Risk

Ambac’s interest rate swaps with professional swap-dealer counterparties and certain front-end counterparties are generally executed under standardized derivative documents including collateral support and master netting agreements. Under these agreements, Ambac is required to post collateral in the event net unrealized losses exceed predetermined threshold levels. Additionally, given that Ambac Assurance is no longer rated by an independent rating agency, counterparties have the right to terminate the swap positions.

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with contingent features linked to Ambac’s own credit risk that are in a net liability position after considering legal rights of offset was $238,203 and $266,626, respectively, related to which Ambac had posted assets as collateral with a fair value of $286,660 and $263,530, respectively. All such ratings-based contingent features have been triggered as requiring maximum collateral levels to be posted by Ambac while preserving counterparties’ rights to terminate the contracts. Assuming all contracts terminated on June 30, 2012, settlement of collateral balances and net derivative liabilities would result in a net receipt of cash and/or securities by Ambac. If counterparties elect to exercise their right to terminate, the actual termination payment amounts will be determined in accordance with derivative contract terms, which may result in amounts that differ from market values as reported in Ambac’s financial statements.