XML 22 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.26.1
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2026
Intangible Asset, Goodwill and Other [Abstract]  
INTANGIBLE ASSETS INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consisted of the following as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
June 30, 2026December 31, 2025
GrossAccumulated
Amortization
NetGrossAccumulated
Amortization
Net
Goodwill(1)
$— $— $— $— $— $— 
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Licenses15,847 (13,173)2,674 15,847 (13,021)2,826 
Trade names104,580 (38,666)65,914 104,617 (35,376)69,241 
Customer relationships143,158 (88,264)54,894 143,159 (83,347)59,812 
Other5,888 (5,081)807 5,894 (4,851)1,043 
Total$269,473 $(145,184)$124,289 $269,517 $(136,595)$132,922 
(1) The net value at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 reflect a reduction of $113.0 million impairment charges within U.S. segment and $11.9 million impairment charges within International segment.
Goodwill impairment test
In the second quarter of 2025, the Company observed a sustained decline in the market valuation of the Companys common stock. Additionally, the Companys near term forecasts for the U.S. reporting unit were revised downward due to changes in retailer and consumer buying patterns, which were impacted by the recent changes in the U.S. tariff policies. Based on these factors the Company concluded that impairment indicators for the U.S. reporting unit were present as of June 30, 2025.
The Company performed an interim impairment test of the goodwill in the U.S. reporting unit as of June 30, 2025 by comparing its fair value with its carrying value. The analysis was performed by using a discounted cash flow and market multiple method. Accordingly, this fair value measurement is classified as Level 3 since it is based primarily on unobservable inputs. Based upon the analysis performed, the Company’s U.S. reporting unit goodwill was fully impaired and a $33.2 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge was recognized. The goodwill impairment charge was the result of the decline in the Company’s near term forecasts that were revised downward due to the changes in retailer and consumer buying patterns and an increase to the company-specific risk premium, which is an input to the cost of capital assumption, to address the potential risks in the long-term forecast.