XML 29 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Collaborative Arrangements and Licensing Agreements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Collaborative Arrangements and Licensing Agreements 
Collaborative Arrangements and Licensing Agreements

6.                                    Collaborative Arrangements and Licensing Agreements

 

Traditional Pharmaceutical Alliances and Licensing

 

GlaxoSmithKline

 

In March 2010, we entered into a strategic alliance with GSK, which covers up to six programs, in which we use our antisense drug discovery platform to seek out and develop new drugs against targets for rare and serious diseases, including infectious diseases and some conditions causing blindness.  This alliance allows us to control and facilitate rapid development of drugs while still being eligible to receive milestone payments as we advance these drugs in clinical development.

 

As of September 30, 2011, we have received $48 million from GSK, which includes the $35 million upfront payment and the $3 million payment we received in May 2011 when GSK expanded the collaboration by initiating a sixth program, both of which we are amortizing over the five year period of our performance.  To date we have earned $15 million in milestone payments, including a $5 million milestone that we will recognize in the fourth quarter of 2011 for designation of ISIS-AATRx as the second development candidate in our collaboration with GSK.

 

We are also eligible to receive on average up to $20 million in milestone payments per program up to Phase 2 proof-of-concept. GSK has the option to license drugs from these programs at Phase 2 proof-of-concept, and will be responsible for all further development and commercialization.  If all six programs are successfully developed for one or more indications and commercialized through pre-agreed sales targets we could receive license fees and substantive milestone payments of more than $1.4 billion, including up to $358.5 million for the achievement of development milestones, up to $506.5 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones and up to $570 million for the achievement of commercialization milestones.  The development milestones exclude the $5 million milestone payment we earned in October 2011.  We will earn the next milestone payment of $2 million upon demonstrating in-vivo efficacy for the next drug discovery target.  In addition, we will receive up to double-digit royalties on sales from any product that GSK successfully commercializes under this alliance.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized revenue of $2 million and $10.7 million, respectively, from our relationship with GSK which represented 10 percent and 16 percent, respectively, of our total revenue for those periods compared to $6.8 million and $8.5 million for the same periods in 2010. Our balance sheet at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 included deferred revenue of $27.2 million and $29.8 million, respectively, related to the upfront and expansion payments.

 

Genzyme Corporation, a Sanofi company

 

In January 2008, we entered into a strategic alliance with Genzyme focused on the licensing and co-development of mipomersen and a research relationship. The license and co-development agreement provides Genzyme with exclusive worldwide rights for all therapeutic purposes to our patents and know-how related to mipomersen, including the key product related patents described in the “Patent and Proprietary Rights” section under “ApoB and Mipomersen”  on page 28 of  our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and their foreign equivalents pending world-wide in various countries, including in the European Union via the European Patent Convention, Japan, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and India.   In addition, we agreed that we would not develop or commercialize another oligonucleotide-based compound designed to modulate apolipoprotein B-100 by binding to the mRNA encoding apolipoprotein B-100, throughout the world.

 

The transaction, which closed in June 2008, included a $175 million licensing fee, a $150 million equity investment in our stock in which we issued Genzyme five million shares of our common stock at $30 per share and a share of worldwide profits on mipomersen and follow-on drugs ranging from 30 percent to 50 percent of all commercial sales.  We may also receive over $1.5 billion in substantive milestone payments upon the achievement of pre-specified events, including up to $750 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones and up to $825 million for the achievement of commercialization milestones.  The next milestone payment we could potentially earn under our agreement with Genzyme is $25 million when the FDA accepts the NDA for mipomersen.

 

Under this alliance, Genzyme is responsible for the continued development and commercialization of mipomersen.  We agreed to supply the active pharmaceutical ingredient for mipomersen for the Phase 3 clinical trials and initial commercial launch.  Genzyme is responsible for manufacturing the finished drug product for mipomersen, including the initial commercial launch supply, and, if approved, Genzyme will be responsible for the long term supply of mipomersen drug substance and finished drug product.  In addition, we will contribute up to the first $125 million in funding for the development costs of mipomersen, which we expect to meet in 2011. Thereafter, we and Genzyme will share external development costs equally.  Our initial development funding commitment and the shared funding will end when the program is profitable.  As part of our alliance, Genzyme has a first right of negotiation for ISIS-SOD1Rx.

 

The license and co-development agreement for mipomersen will continue in perpetuity unless earlier terminated by us or Genzyme under the following situations:

 

·                  Genzyme may terminate the license and co-development agreement at any time by providing written notice to Isis;

·                  We may terminate the license and co-development agreement on a country-by-country basis or in its entirety upon Genzyme’s uncured failure to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize mipomersen in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan and Canada; and

·                  Either we or Genzyme may terminate the license and co-development agreement upon the other party’s uncured failure to perform a material obligation under the agreement.

 

Upon termination of the license and co-development agreement, the license we granted to Genzyme for mipomersen will terminate and Genzyme will stop selling the product.  In addition, if Genzyme voluntarily terminates the agreement or we terminate the agreement in a country or countries for Genzyme’s failure to develop and commercialize mipomersen, then the rights to mipomersen will revert back to us and we may develop and commercialize mipomersen in the countries that are the subject of the termination, subject to a royalty payable to Genzyme.

 

If we are the subject of an acquisition, then within 180 days following the acquisition, Genzyme may elect to purchase all of our rights to receive payments under the mipomersen license and co-development agreement for a purchase price to be mutually agreed to by us and Genzyme, or, if we cannot agree, a fair market value price determined by an independent investment banking firm.

 

Genzyme has agreed that it will not sell the Isis stock that it purchased in February 2008 until the earlier of four years from the date of our mipomersen license and co-development agreement, the first commercial sale of mipomersen or the termination of our mipomersen license and co-development Agreement. Thereafter, Genzyme will be subject to monthly limits on the number of shares it can sell. In addition, Genzyme has agreed that until the earlier of the 10 year anniversary of the mipomersen license and co-development agreement or the date Genzyme holds less than two percent of our issued and outstanding common stock, Genzyme will not acquire any additional shares of our common stock without our consent.

 

The price Genzyme paid for our common stock represented a significant premium over the fair value of our common stock.  We are amortizing this $100 million premium along with the $175 million licensing fee that we received in the second quarter of 2008 ratably into revenue until June 2012, which represents the end of our performance obligation based on the current research and development plan.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized revenue of $16.6 million and $49.9 million, respectively, primarily related to the upfront payments we received from Genzyme, which represented 80 percent and 75 percent, respectively, of our total revenue for those periods compared to $16.8 million and $50.2 million for the same periods in 2010.  Our balance sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 included deferred revenue of $44.3 million and $94.1 million, respectively.

 

Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly Ortho-McNeil, Inc.

 

In September 2007, we entered into a collaboration with OMJP to discover, develop and commercialize antisense drugs to treat metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes. As part of the collaboration, we granted OMJP worldwide development and commercialization rights to two of our diabetes programs, our glucagon receptor, or GCGR, and glucocorticoid  receptor, or GCCR, programs. The collaboration ended and we regained the rights to drugs from both of these programs.  We intend to move forward a more potent inhibitor for our GCGR program, which we identified as part of our collaboration with OMJP.  We also intend to move forward the GCCR program.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with OMJP.

 

Bristol-Myers Squibb

 

In May 2007, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb to discover, develop and commercialize novel antisense drugs targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, or PCSK9. Under the terms of the agreement, we received a $15 million upfront licensing fee and Bristol-Myers Squibb agreed to provide us with at least $9 million in research funding over an initial period of three years.  We finished amortizing the $15 million upfront fee into revenue when our period of performance under the original agreement ended in April 2010.

 

In April 2008, Bristol-Myers Squibb designated the first development candidate resulting from the collaboration for which we earned a $2 million milestone payment.  In March 2010, we earned a $6 million milestone payment from the initiation of clinical studies.  In 2010, Bristol-Myers Squibb stopped the Phase 1 study of the first development candidate and discontinued development of the drug.  In July 2010, we and Bristol-Myers Squibb extended our collaboration and license agreement by two years to work together to discover a more potent PCSK9 antisense drug to move into development.

 

Under the agreement, we may receive up to $245 million for the achievement of substantive pre-specified development and regulatory milestones, including up to $50 million for the achievement of development milestones and up to $195 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones.  We will earn the next milestone payment of $2 million if Bristol-Myers Squibb selects a more potent PCSK9 antisense drug development candidate.  Bristol-Myers Squibb will also pay us royalties on sales of products resulting from the collaboration.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized revenue of $575,000 and $2 million, respectively, related to the upfront licensing fee, milestone payments and the research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb compared to $700,000 and $11.4 million for the same periods in 2010.   Revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 represented three percent of our total revenue for each of those periods.

 

Eli Lilly and Company

 

In August 2001, we formed a broad strategic relationship with Eli Lilly and Company, which included a joint research collaboration.  As part of the collaboration, Eli Lilly and Company licensed LY2181308, an antisense inhibitor of survivin, and LY2275796, an antisense inhibitor of eIF-4E, or eukaryotic initiation factor-4E.  Eli Lilly and Company is responsible for the preclinical and clinical development of LY2181308.

 

As of September 30, 2011, we had earned $4.1 million in license fees and milestone payments related to the continued development of LY2181308. We may receive additional substantive milestone payments aggregating up to $25 million, including up to $5 million for the achievement of development milestones, up to $8 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones and up to $12 million for the achievement of commercialization milestones and royalties.  We will earn the next milestone of $5 million if Eli Lilly and Company initiates a Phase 3 study of LY2181308.

 

In December 2009, we reacquired LY2275796, renamed ISIS-EIF4ERx, and we are continuing to develop the drug.  Eli Lilly and Company has the right to reacquire ISIS-EIF4ERx on predefined terms prior to the initiation of Phase 3 development.  However, if we publicly disclose the results from a Phase 2 clinical study of ISIS-EIF4ERx:

 

·      Eli Lilly and Company may license ISIS-EIF4ERx on the predefined terms;

·      Eli Lilly and Company may tell us it is not interested in licensing ISIS-EIF4ERx, in which case we may license ISIS-EIF4ERx to another partner; or

·      Eli Lilly and Company may offer to license ISIS-EIF4ERx on terms that are lower than the predefined terms, in which case we may license ISIS-EIF4ERx to another partner so long as the licensing terms we reach with the new partner are better than terms offered by Eli Lilly and Company and we have not publicly disclosed any results from a new clinical study of ISIS-EIF4ERx prior to reaching the agreement with the new partner.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Eli Lilly and Company.

 

Drug Discovery and Development Satellite Company Collaborations

 

Altair Therapeutics Inc.

 

In October 2007, we licensed AIR645 to Altair, a biotechnology company that was focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapeutics to treat human respiratory diseases. We granted an exclusive worldwide license to Altair for the development and commercialization of AIR645, an antisense drug for the treatment of asthma.  Altair evaluated AIR645 in patients with asthma in a Phase 2 study.  In this study, treatment with AIR645 reduced its intended target and patients tolerated the drug well.  However, reducing the target did not produce enough therapeutic benefit to warrant continued development and Altair discontinued the program.  In December 2010, we and Altair terminated our collaboration and license agreement and we reacquired AIR645 as well as Altair’s assets related to AIR645.  Altair distributed cash to its preferred shareholders in December 2010, and we received $408,000 from that distribution.  Our ownership of Altair was less than 10 percent at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Altair.  Also, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Altair compared to $17,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

 

Antisense Therapeutics Limited

 

In December 2001, we licensed ATL1102 to ATL, an Australian company publicly traded on the Australian Stock Exchange and in February 2008, ATL licensed ATL1102 to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.  When Teva decided to continue the development of ATL1102, we earned $1.4 million of sublicense revenue, which we included in revenue in 2008.  In 2009, we earned $2 million from Teva for manufacturing ATL1102 drug product.  In March 2010, Teva terminated the licensing agreement for ATL1102 and returned to ATL rights to ATL1102.

 

In addition to ATL1102, ATL is currently developing ATL1103 for growth and sight disorders. ATL1103 is a product of our joint antisense drug discovery and development collaboration.  In December 2010, ATL completed a successful offering and raised approximately $2.4 million that it will use to advance ATL1103.  ATL pays us for access to our antisense expertise and for research and manufacturing services we may provide to ATL.  In October 2009 we agreed to manufacture ATL1103 drug product for ATL in return for 18.5 million shares of ATL’s common stock.  Additionally, ATL will pay royalties to us on sales of ATL1102 and ATL1103. We may also receive a portion of the fees ATL receives if it licenses ATL1102 or ATL1103.

 

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned less than 10 percent of ATL’s equity.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized revenue of $210,000.  For the three months ended September 30, 2011, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we did not recognize any revenue related to this collaboration.  Our balance sheet at December 31, 2010 included deferred revenue of $210,000 related to our agreements with ATL.

 

Atlantic Pharmaceuticals Limited, formerly Atlantic Healthcare (UK) Limited

 

In March 2007, we licensed alicaforsen to Atlantic Pharmaceuticals, a UK-based specialty pharmaceutical company founded in 2006, which is developing alicaforsen for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, or UC, and other inflammatory diseases. Atlantic Pharmaceuticals is initially developing alicaforsen for pouchitis, a UC indication, followed by UC and other inflammatory diseases. In exchange for the exclusive, worldwide license to alicaforsen, we received a $2 million upfront payment from Atlantic Pharmaceuticals in the form of equity.  In September 2010, we participated in Atlantic Pharmaceuticals’ financing by agreeing to sell to Atlantic Pharmaceuticals alicaforsen drug substance in return for shares of Atlantic Pharmaceuticals’ common stock.  At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned approximately 12 percent of Atlantic Pharmaceuticals’ equity.

 

Under the agreement, we could receive substantive milestone payments totaling up to $1.4 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones for multiple indications.  Assuming Atlantic Pharmaceuticals successfully develops and commercializes alicaforsen, we will earn the next milestone payment of $600,000 if Atlantic Pharmaceuticals submits a New Drug Application for alicaforsen with the FDA.  We will also receive royalties on future product sales of alicaforsen.  Atlantic Pharmaceuticals is solely responsible for the continued development of alicaforsen.  In 2010, Atlantic Pharmaceuticals announced that in response to requests received from healthcare professionals, it was to supply alicaforsen under international Named Patient Supply regulations for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, or IBD.  Atlantic Pharmaceuticals is currently pursuing opportunities to fund further development of alicaforsen.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Atlantic Pharmaceuticals.

 

Excaliard Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 

In November 2007, we entered into a collaboration with Excaliard to discover and develop antisense drugs for the local treatment of fibrotic diseases, including scarring. We granted Excaliard an exclusive worldwide license for the development and commercialization of certain antisense drugs. Excaliard made an upfront payment to us in the form of equity and paid us $1 million in cash for the licensing of an antisense oligonucleotide drug targeting expression of connective tissue growth factor, or CTGF, that is activated during skin scarring following the wound healing process. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned less than 10 percent of Excaliard’s equity and we have no remaining performance obligations.

 

In 2010 and 2011, we participated in Excaliard’s financings at nominal amounts to maintain our ownership percentage.  In addition, assuming Excaliard successfully develops and commercializes drugs it licenses from us, we may receive substantive milestone payments totaling up to $47.7 million for the achievement of key clinical and regulatory milestones, including up to $7.7 million for the achievement of development milestones and up to $40.0 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones.  We will earn the next milestone payment of $1.2 million if Excaliard initiates a Phase 3 study for EXC001.  We will also receive royalties on antisense drugs that Excaliard develops and commercializes.  We may also receive a portion of the fees Excaliard receives if it licenses drugs from our collaboration.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Excaliard.  Also, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Excaliard compared to $3,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

 

iCo Therapeutics Inc.

 

In August 2005, we granted a license to iCo for the development and commercialization of iCo-007.  iCo is developing iCo-007 for the treatment of various eye diseases caused by the formation and leakage of new blood vessels such as diabetic macular edema and diabetic retinopathy. iCo paid us a $500,000 upfront fee and may pay us substantive milestone payments totaling up to $48.4 million for the achievement of clinical and regulatory milestones for multiple indications, including up to $7.9 million for the achievement of development milestones and up to $40.5 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones.  We will receive the next milestone payment of $4 million if iCo initiates a Phase 3 study for iCo-007.  In addition, we will receive royalties on any product sales of this drug. Under the terms of the agreement, iCo is solely responsible for the clinical development and commercialization of the drug.  In September 2007, iCo initiated Phase 1 clinical trials for iCo-007 and we earned a milestone payment of $1.25 million in the form of 936,875 shares of iCo’s common stock.

 

Over the course of our relationship, iCo has paid us in a combination of cash and equity instruments, which included common stock and convertible notes.  In February 2009, iCo completed a CAD $1.3 million financing to fund the completion of its Phase 1 clinical study of iCo-007.  We participated in the financing at a nominal amount to maintain our ownership percentage.  In January 2010, we exercised the warrants we held to purchase 1.1 million shares of iCo’s common stock and as a result our ownership in iCo at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was approximately 12 percent.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with iCo.  Also, during the three months ended September 30, 2011 we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with iCo compared to $7,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

OncoGenex Technologies Inc., a subsidiary of OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

 

In November 2001, we established a drug development collaboration with OncoGenex, a biotechnology company committed to the development of cancer therapeutics for patients with drug resistant and metastatic cancers, to co-develop and commercialize OGX-011, an anti-cancer antisense drug that targets clusterin.  In July 2008, we and OncoGenex amended the co-development agreement pursuant to which OncoGenex became solely responsible for the costs, development and commercialization of OGX-011.  In exchange, OncoGenex agreed to pay us royalties on sales of OGX-011 and to share consideration it receives from licensing OGX-011 to a third party, except for consideration received by OncoGenex for the fair market value of equity and reimbursement of research and development expenses.

 

Under the amended agreement, we assigned to OncoGenex our rights in the patents claiming the composition and therapeutic methods of using OGX-011, and granted OncoGenex a worldwide, nonexclusive license to our know-how and patents covering our core antisense technology and manufacturing technology solely for use with OGX-011.  The key product related patent that we assigned to OncoGenex was U.S. Patent number 6,900,187  having an expiration date of at least 2020; and the key core antisense technology patents we licensed OncoGenex are U.S. Patent number 7,919,472 having an expiration date of 2026 and its foreign equivalents pending in Australia, Canada, the European Patent Convention and Japan.   In addition, we agreed that so long as OncoGenex or its commercialization partner is using commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize OGX-011, we will not research, develop or commercialize an antisense compound designed to modulate clusterin.  The amended agreement will continue until OncoGenex or its commercialization partner is no longer developing or commercializing OGX-011 or until we terminate the agreement for an uncured failure by OncoGenex to make a payment required under the agreement.

 

In December 2009, OncoGenex granted Teva the exclusive worldwide right and license to develop and commercialize any products containing OGX-011 and related compounds, with OncoGenex having an option to co-promote OGX-011 in the United States and Canada, for which we received $10 million of the upfront payment OncoGenex received from Teva.  We are also eligible to receive 30 percent of up to $370 million in milestone payments OncoGenex may receive from Teva in addition to royalties on sales of OGX-011 ranging between 3.88 percent and seven percent.  Under the agreement, this royalty is due on a country by country basis until the later of ten years following the first commercial sale of OGX-011 in the relevant country, and the expiration of the last patent we assigned or licensed to OncoGenex that covers the making, using or selling of OGX-011 in such country.

 

To facilitate the execution and performance of OncoGenex’s agreement with Teva, we and OncoGenex amended our license agreement primarily to give Teva the ability to cure any future potential breach by OncoGenex under our agreement.  As part of this amendment, OncoGenex agreed that if OncoGenex is the subject of a change of control with a third party, where the surviving entity immediately following such change of control has the right to develop and sell OGX-011, then a payment of $20 million will be due and payable to Isis 21 days following the first commercial sale of the product in the United States. Any non-royalty payments OncoGenex previously paid to us are creditable towards the $20 million payment, so as a result of the $10 million payment we received from OncoGenex related to its license to Teva, the remaining amount owing in the event of a change of control as discussed above is a maximum of $10 million.

 

In August 2003, we and OncoGenex entered into a separate collaboration and license agreement for the development of a second-generation antisense anti-cancer drug, OGX-225. OncoGenex is responsible for all development costs and activities, and we have no further performance obligations. OncoGenex issued to us $750,000 of OncoGenex securities as payment for an upfront fee. In addition, OncoGenex will pay us milestone payments totaling up to $3.5 million for the achievement of clinical and regulatory milestones, including up to $1.5 million for the achievement of development milestones and up to $2 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones.  In addition, we will receive royalties on future product sales of the drug. As of September 30, 2011, OncoGenex had not achieved any milestone events related to OGX-225.  We will earn the next milestone payment of $500,000 if OncoGenex initiates a Phase 2 study for OGX-225.

 

In January 2005, we entered into a further agreement with OncoGenex to allow for the development of an additional second-generation antisense anti-cancer drug. Under the terms of the agreement, OncoGenex is responsible for all development costs and activities, and we have no further performance obligations. In April 2005, OncoGenex selected OGX-427 to develop under the collaboration. OncoGenex will pay us substantive milestone payments totaling up to $5.8 million for the achievement of key clinical and regulatory milestones, including up to $1.3 million for the achievement of development milestones and up to $4.5 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones.  We will also receive royalties on future product sales of the drug.  In January 2011, we earned a $750,000 milestone payment related to OncoGenex’s phase 2 trial in men with metastatic prostate cancer.  We will earn the next milestone payment of $1.3 million if OncoGenex initiates a Phase 3 study for OGX-427.

 

During 2009, we sold all of the common stock of OncoGenex that we owned resulting in net cash proceeds of $2.8 million. As of December 31, 2009, we no longer owned any shares of OncoGenex.   During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized $750,000 in revenue from our relationship with OncoGenex.  For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with OncoGenex.  Our balance sheet at December 31, 2010 included deferred revenue of $750,000 related to our relationship with Oncogenex.

 

Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.

 

In November 2010, we established a collaboration with Xenon to discover and develop antisense drugs as novel treatments for the common disease anemia of inflammation, or AI. AI is the second most common form of anemia worldwide and is associated with a wide variety of conditions including infection, cancer and chronic inflammation.  We received an upfront payment in the form of a convertible promissory note from Xenon to discover and develop antisense drugs to the targets hemojuvelin and hepcidin.  In addition to license and option fees, we are eligible to receive development and commercial milestone payments and royalties on sales of drugs licensed to Xenon under the collaboration and a portion of sublicense revenue.  If Xenon identifies a development candidate, Xenon may take an exclusive license for the development and worldwide commercialization for this development candidate.

 

Under our collaboration agreement with Xenon we may receive up to $300 million in substantive milestone payments for multiple indications upon the achievement of pre-specified events, including up to $30 million for the achievement of development milestones, up to $150 million for the achievement of regulatory milestones and up to $120 million for the achievement of commercialization milestones.  We will earn the next milestone payment of $2 million if Xenon selects a development candidate.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Xenon.

 

Technology Development Satellite Company Collaborations

 

Achaogen, Inc.

 

In 2006, we exclusively outlicensed to Achaogen, Inc. specific know-how, patents and patent applications relating to aminoglycosides. Aminoglycosides are a class of small molecule antibiotics that inhibit bacterial protein synthesis and that clinicians use to treat serious bacterial infections.  In exchange, Achaogen agreed to certain payment obligations related to aminoglycosides developed by Achaogen.  Achaogen is developing plazomicin (formerly ACHN-490), an aminoglycoside discovered by Achaogen based on the technology we licensed to Achaogen.  Plazomicin has displayed broad-spectrum activity in animals against multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria that cause systemic infections, including E. coli.  The compound has also demonstrated activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA.

 

In connection with the license, Achaogen issued to us $1.5 million of Achaogen Series A Preferred Stock.  In January 2009, we received a $1 million payment from Achaogen, consisting of $500,000 in cash and $500,000 in Achaogen securities, as a result of the filing of an IND for Achaogen’s aminoglycoside drug, ACHN-490.  In 2010, we received a $2 million payment from Achaogen as a result of the initiation of a Phase 2 study of ACHN-490.  At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned less than 10 percent of Achaogen’s equity.  In addition, assuming Achaogen successfully develops and commercializes the first two drugs, we may receive payments totaling up to $46.3 million for the achievement of key clinical, regulatory and sales events. We will also receive royalties on sales of drugs resulting from the program. Achaogen is solely responsible for the continued development of Plazomicin.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized $2 million in revenue from our relationship with Achaogen.  We did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Achaogen for the same periods in 2011.

 

Archemix Corp.

 

In August 2007, we and Archemix entered into a strategic alliance focused on aptamer drug discovery and development. Archemix obtained a license to our technology for aptamer drugs, which take advantage of the three-dimensional structure of oligonucleotides to bind to proteins rather than targeting messenger ribonucleic acid, or mRNA. Through this licensing partnership, we are providing access to our oligonucleotide chemistry and other relevant patents to facilitate the discovery and development of aptamer drugs based on Archemix’s technology. In November 2007, we received a $250,000 payment from Archemix associated with the initiation of Phase 2a trials of their aptamer drug.  In May 2009, we received a nominal payment from Archemix related to the advancement of their aptamer drug that incorporates our technology.  We will receive a portion of any sublicensing fees Archemix generates as well as up to $1.5 million for the achievement of pre-specified events and royalties on Archemix’ drugs that use our technology.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Archemix.

 

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 

In March 2004, we entered into a strategic alliance with Alnylam to develop and commercialize RNA interference, or RNAi, therapeutics. Under the terms of the agreement, we exclusively licensed to Alnylam our patent estate relating to antisense motifs and mechanisms and oligonucleotide chemistry for double-stranded RNAi therapeutics in exchange for a $5 million technology access fee, participation in fees for Alnylam’s partnering programs, as well as future milestone and royalty payments from Alnylam. For each drug Alnylam develops under this alliance, we may receive up to $3.4 million in substantive milestone payments, including up to $1.1 million for the achievement of development milestones and $2.3 million for regulatory milestones.  In December 2010, we earned a $375,000 milestone payment from Alnylam for the initiation of a Phase 1 study in their transthyretin, or TTR, program.  We will earn the next milestone payment of $750,000 if Alnylam initiates a Phase 3 study for TTR.  We retained rights to a limited number of double-stranded RNAi therapeutic targets and all rights to single-stranded RNAi, or ssRNAi, therapeutics. We also made a $10 million equity investment in Alnylam at the time of the agreement.  During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we sold our holdings of Alnylam stock resulting in aggregate net cash proceeds of $12.2 million and a net gain on investments of $6.2 million.  As of December 31, 2007, we no longer own any shares of Alnylam.

 

In turn, Alnylam nonexclusively licensed to us its patent estate relating to antisense motifs and mechanisms and oligonucleotide chemistry to research, develop and commercialize ssRNAi therapeutics and to research double-stranded RNAi compounds. We also received a license to develop and commercialize double-stranded RNAi drugs targeting a limited number of therapeutic targets on a nonexclusive basis. If we develop or commercialize an RNAi-based drug using Alnylam’s technology, we will pay Alnylam milestone payments and royalties. For each drug, the potential milestone payments to Alnylam total $3.4 million, which we will pay upon the occurrence of specified development and regulatory events. As of September 30, 2011, we did not have an RNAi-based drug in clinical development.

 

In April 2009, we and Alnylam amended our strategic collaboration and license agreement to form a new collaboration focused on the development of single-stranded RNAi technology.  Under the terms of the amended collaboration and license agreement, Alnylam paid us an upfront license fee of $11 million plus $2.6 million of research and development funding in 2009 and 2010.  In November 2010, Alnylam terminated the ssRNAi research program and we recognized $4.9 million of revenue from the upfront fee that we were amortizing into revenue over the research term.  As a result, any licenses to ssRNAi products granted by us to Alnylam under the agreement, and any obligation by Alnylam to pay milestone payments, royalties or sublicense payments to us for ssRNAi products under the agreement, terminated.  We continue to advance the development of ssRNAi technology and during the course of the collaboration, we made improvements in the activity of ssRNAi compounds, including increased efficacy and potency as well as enhanced distribution.

 

As of September 30, 2011, we had earned a total of $37.1 million from Alnylam resulting from sublicenses of our technology for the development of RNAi therapeutics that Alnylam has granted to pharmaceutical partners.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized $1.4 million and $4.1 million, in revenue from our relationship with Alnylam.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Alnylam.

 

AVI BioPharma, Inc., formerly Ercole Biotech, Inc.

 

In May 2003, we and Ercole entered an agreement in which each party cross-licensed its respective intellectual property related to alternative RNA splicing.  As part of the agreement, we granted Ercole an additional license to some of our chemistry patents.  Assuming Ercole successfully develops and commercializes a drug incorporating the splicing technology or chemistry we licensed to Ercole, we may receive payments totaling up to $21 million for the achievement of key events.  We will also receive royalties on sales of these drugs. Ercole is solely responsible for the continued development of its drugs.

 

Similarly, if we successfully develop and commercialize a drug incorporating the splicing technology Ercole licensed to us, we will pay Ercole up to $21 million for the achievement of key clinical, regulatory and sales events and will also pay royalties to Ercole on sales of these drugs.  We currently do not have a drug incorporating Ercole’s technology in clinical development.

 

In March 2008, AVI BioPharma, Inc. acquired Ercole’s rights and obligations under the collaboration agreement.  As a result of our collaboration agreement with Ercole, as part of the acquisition, we received a warrant to purchase 238,228 shares of AVI’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.1679 per share, and a warrant to purchase 207,757 shares of AVI’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.61 per share.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with Ercole.

 

External Project Funding

 

CHDI Foundation, Inc.

 

In November 2007, we entered into an agreement with CHDI, which provided us funding for the discovery and development of an antisense drug for the treatment of Huntington’s disease.  In August 2011, we renewed our collaboration with CHDI.  CHDI’s funding builds upon an earlier successful collaboration between us and CHDI, in which CHDI funded proof-of-concept studies that demonstrated the feasibility of using antisense drugs to treat Huntington’s disease.  Under the terms of the new collaboration, we will receive funding from CHDI to identify and conduct IND-enabling studies on an antisense drug targeting the huntingtin gene.  If we grant a license to a third party to commercialize our Huntington’s disease program, we and CHDI will evenly split the proceeds from the license until CHDI has recouped its funding together with a return determined at a predefined interest rate.  Thereafter, we will keep the full amount of any additional proceeds.  In addition, CHDI will reimburse us for approximately $1.7 million of research-related expenses we incurred after the earlier collaboration ended in 2010, which we are amortizing over the initial period of our performance obligation.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized revenue of $997,000 from our relationship with CHDI compared to $206,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  During the three ended September 30, 2010, we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with CHDI.  Our balance sheet at September 30, 2011 included deferred revenue of $203,000 related to our relationship with CHDI.

 

ALS Association; The Ludwig Institute; Center for Neurological Studies; Muscular Dystrophy Association

 

In October 2005, we entered a collaboration agreement with the Ludwig Institute, the Center for Neurological Studies and researchers from these institutions to discover and develop antisense drugs in the areas of ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, and other neurodegenerative diseases. Under this agreement, we agreed to pay the Ludwig Institute and Center for Neurological Studies modest milestone payments and royalties on any antisense drugs resulting from the collaboration.  The researchers from the Ludwig Institute and Center for Neurological Studies, through funding from the ALS Association and the Muscular Dystrophy Association, conducted IND-enabling preclinical studies of ISIS-SOD1RX.  The ALS Association and the Muscular Dystrophy Association provided funding to offset the costs of the Phase 1 study of ISIS-SOD1RX.  Except for the funding provided by the ALS Association and the Muscular Dystrophy Association, we control and are responsible for funding the continued development of ISIS-SOD1RX.

 

Intellectual Property Sale and Licensing Agreements

 

Out-Licensing Arrangements; Royalty Sharing Agreements; Sales of IP

 

Abbott Molecular Inc.

 

In January 2009, we sold our former subsidiary, Ibis Biosciences, to Abbott Molecular Inc., or AMI, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for a total acquisition price of $215 million plus the earn out payments described below.

 

Under the stock purchase agreement, AMI will pay us earn out payments equal to a percentage of Ibis’ revenue related to sales of Ibis systems, including instruments, assay kits and successor products, from the date of the acquisition closing through December 31, 2025.  The earn out payments will equal five percent of Ibis’ cumulative net sales over $140 million and up to $2.1 billion, and three percent of Ibis’ cumulative net sales over $2.1 billion.  AMI may reduce these earn out payments from five percent to as low as 2.5 percent and from three percent to as low as 1.5 percent, respectively, upon the occurrence of certain events.  During 2010 and 2011 we did not recognize any revenue from our relationship with AMI.

 

Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 

In December 2001, we licensed to Eyetech certain of our patents necessary for Eyetech to develop, make and commercialize Macugen, a non-antisense drug for use in the treatment of ophthalmic diseases, that Eyetech is developing and commercializing with Pfizer Inc. Eyetech paid us a $2 million upfront fee and agreed to pay us for the achievment of pre-specified events and royalty payments in exchange for non-exclusive, worldwide rights to the intellectual property licensed from us.  During 2004, we earned $4 million in payments, and our license with Eyetech may also generate additional payments aggregating up to $2.8 million for the achievement of specified regulatory events with respect to the use of Macugen for each additional therapeutic indication.  Prior to 2010, we had assigned our rights to receive royalties for Macugen to Drug Royalty Trust 3.

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized revenue of $195,000 and $604,000, respectively, of revenue related to royalties for Macugen under our license to Eyetech, compared to $230,000 and $378,000 for the same periods in 2010.

 

Roche Molecular Systems

 

In October 2000, we licensed some of our novel chemistry patents to Roche Molecular Systems, a business unit of Roche Diagnostics, for use in the production of Roche Molecular Systems’ diagnostic products. The royalty-bearing license grants Roche Molecular Systems non-exclusive worldwide access to some of our proprietary chemistries in exchange for initial and ongoing payments from Roche Molecular Systems to us.  In April 2011, we expanded our relationship with Roche Diagnostics by granting Roche a non-exclusive license to additional technology for research and diagnostic uses.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized revenue of $216,000 and $630,000, respectively, from our relationship with Roche Molecular Systems, compared to $477,000 and $1.4 million for the same periods in 2010.  Our balance sheet at December 31, 2010 included deferred revenue of $150,000 related to our agreements with Roche Molecular Systems.

 

In-Licensing Arrangements

 

Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly Hybridon, Inc.

 

We have an agreement with Idera under which we acquired an exclusive license to all of Idera’s antisense chemistry and delivery technology related to our second generation antisense drugs and to double-stranded siRNA therapeutics. Idera retained the right to practice its licensed antisense patent technologies and to sublicense their technologies to collaborators under certain circumstances. In addition, Idera received a non-exclusive license to our suite of ribonuclease H, or RNase H, patents.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized $10,000 in revenue for each of those periods, from our relationship with Idera, compared to $10,000 and $20,000 for the same periods in 2010.

 

Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.

 

In March 1999, we further solidified our intellectual property leadership position in antisense technology by licensing certain antisense patents from IDT, a leading supplier of antisense inhibitors for research. The patents we licensed from IDT are useful in functional genomics and in making our second-generation chemistry.  We expect these patents will expire in February 2013.  Under the license, we paid IDT $4.9 million in license fees in 2001 and we will pay royalties on sales of any drugs utilizing the technology we licensed from IDT until the patents expire.

 

University of Massachusetts

 

We have a license agreement with the University of Massachusetts under which we acquired an exclusive license to the University of Massachusetts’ patent rights related to ISIS-SMNRx. If we successfully develop and commercialize a drug incorporating the technology we licensed from the University of Massachusetts, we will pay milestone payments to the University of Massachusetts totaling up to $650,000 for the achievement of key clinical and regulatory milestones.  In addition, we will pay the University of Massachusetts a portion of any sublicense revenue we receive from sublicensing its technology, and a royalty on sales of ISIS-SMNRx in the United States if our product incorporates the technology we licensed from the University of Massachusetts.

 

Verva Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

 

We have a license agreement with Verva under which we acquired an exclusive license to Verva’s antisense patent rights related to ISIS-FGFR4Rx.  If we successfully develop and commercialize a drug incorporating the technology Verva licensed to us, we will pay milestone payments to Verva totaling up to $6.1 million for the achievement of key patent, clinical, and regulatory milestones.  If we convert our license from an exclusive license to a nonexclusive license we could significantly reduce the milestone payments due to Verva.  In addition, we will also pay royalties to Verva on sales of ISIS-FGFR4Rx if our product incorporates the technology we licensed from Verva.

 

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

 

We have a collaboration and license agreement with the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory under which we acquired an exclusive license to the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory’s patent rights related to ISIS-SMNRx. If we successfully develop and commercialize a drug incorporating the technology we licensed from the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, we will pay milestone payments to the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory totaling up to $900,000 for the achievement of key clinical and regulatory milestones.  In addition, we will pay the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory a portion of any sublicense revenue we receive from sublicensing the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory’s technology, and a royalty on sales of ISIS-SMNRx if our product incorporates the technology we licensed from the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.