XML 20 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
4.
Fair Value Measurements

We use a three-tier fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in our fair value measurements. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, which includes our money market funds and treasury securities classified as available-for-sale securities and our investment in equity securities in publicly-held biotechnology companies; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable, which includes our fixed income securities and commercial paper classified as available-for-sale securities; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring us to develop our own assumptions. We classify the majority of our securities as Level 2. We obtain the fair value of our Level 2 investments from our custodian bank or from a professional pricing service. We validate the fair value of our Level 2 investments by understanding the pricing model used by the custodian banks or professional pricing service provider and comparing that fair value to the fair value based on observable market prices. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, there were no transfers between our Level 1 and Level 2 investments. When we recognize transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy, we recognize the transfer on the date the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurs.

The following tables present the major security types we held at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 that are regularly measured and carried at fair value. The tables segregate each security type by the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques we utilized to determine the respective securities’ fair value (in thousands):

  
At
June 30,
2017
  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
  
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Cash equivalents (1)
 
$
113,466
  
$
113,466
  
$
 
Corporate debt securities (2)
  
527,684
   
   
527,684
 
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies (3)
  
82,100
   
   
82,100
 
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury (4)
  
28,270
   
28,270
   
 
Debt securities issued by states of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the states (5)
  
93,039
   
   
93,039
 
Other municipal debt securities (3)
  
2,998
   
   
2,998
 
Total
 
$
847,557
  
$
141,736
  
$
705,821
 

  
At
December 31,
2016
  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
  
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Cash equivalents (1)
 
$
54,137
  
$
54,137
  
$
 
Corporate debt securities (3)
  
396,221
   
   
396,221
 
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies (3)
  
55,179
   
   
55,179
 
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury (3)
  
29,286
   
29,286
   
 
Debt securities issued by states of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the states (5)
  
109,111
   
   
109,111
 
Investment in Regulus Therapeutics Inc.
  
2,414
   
2,414
   
 
Total
 
$
646,348
  
$
85,837
  
$
560,511
 

(1)
Included in cash and cash equivalents on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.


(2)
At June 30, 2017, $7.5 million was included in cash and cash equivalents on our condensed consolidated balance sheet, with the difference included in short-term investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

(3)
Included in short-term investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

(4)
At June 30, 2017, $2.5 million was included in cash and cash equivalents on our condensed consolidated balance sheet, with the difference included in short-term investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

(5)
At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $1.4 million and $9.3 million, respectively, was included in cash and cash equivalents on our condensed consolidated balance sheet, with the difference included in short-term investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Other Fair Value Disclosures

Novartis Future Stock Purchase

In January 2017, we and Akcea entered into a SPA with Novartis. As part of the SPA, Novartis was required to purchase $50 million of Akcea’s common stock at the IPO price or in our common stock at a premium if an IPO did not occur by April 2018. Therefore, at the inception of the SPA, we recorded a $5.0 million asset representing the fair value of the potential future premium we could have received if Novartis purchased our common stock. We determined the fair value of the future premium by calculating the value based on the stated premium in the SPA and estimating the probability of an Akcea IPO. We also included a lack of marketability discount when we determined the fair value of the premium because we would have issued unregistered shares to Novartis if they had purchased our common stock. We measured this asset using Level 3 inputs and recorded it in other assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. At the end of the first and second quarters of 2017 prior to Akcea’s IPO, we reassessed the fair value of this asset. We recorded an adjustment to other income/expense on our condensed consolidated statement of operations for the change in value. As a result of Akcea’s IPO closing in July 2017, we will write-off the remaining balance to other expense on our third quarter 2017 condensed consolidated statement of operations.

The following is a reconciliation of the potential premium we would have received if Akcea had not completed its IPO, measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2017 (in thousands):

Beginning balance of Level 3 asset (at December 31, 2016)
 
$
 
  Value of the potential premium we will receive from Novartis at inception of the SPA (January 2017)
  
5,035
 
  Recurring fair value adjustment during the six months ended June 30, 2017
  
(1,438
)
Ending balance of Level 3 asset (at June 30, 2017)
 
$
3,597
 

At December 31, 2016 we did not have any financial instruments that were valued using Level 3 inputs.

Convertible Notes

Our 1 percent notes had a fair value of $730.4 million at June 30, 2017. We determine the fair value of our notes based on quoted market prices for these notes, which are Level 2 measurements because the notes do not trade regularly.