EX-99.1 2 a16-2879_2ex99d1.htm EX-99.1 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Exhibit 99.1

 

TELUS CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

DECEMBER 31, 2015

 



 

report of management on internal control over financial reporting

 

Management of TELUS Corporation (TELUS, or the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

 

TELUS’ President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer have assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, in accordance with the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer and effected by the Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2015. In connection with this assessment, no material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting were identified by management as of December 31, 2015.

 

Deloitte LLP, an Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, audited the Company’s Consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, and as stated in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, they have expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.

 

/s/ John R. Gossling

 

/s/ Darren Entwistle

 

 

 

John R. Gossling

 

Darren Entwistle

Executive Vice-President

 

President

and Chief Financial Officer

 

and Chief Executive Officer

February 11, 2016

 

February 11, 2016

 

GRAPHIC

 

2



 

report of independent registered public accounting firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of TELUS Corporation

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of TELUS Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company), which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in owners’ equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2015, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

 

Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

 

Auditors’ Responsibility

 

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

 

Opinion

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TELUS Corporation and subsidiaries as at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and their financial performance and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2015, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

 

Other Matter

 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 11, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP

 

 

 

Deloitte LLP

 

Chartered Professional Accountants

 

Vancouver, Canada

 

February 11, 2016

 

GRAPHIC

 

3



 

report of independent registered public accounting firm

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of TELUS Corporation

 

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of TELUS Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

We have also audited, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2015, of the Company and our report dated February 11, 2016, expressed an unmodified/unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP

 

 

 

Deloitte LLP

 

Chartered Professional Accountants

 

Vancouver, Canada

 

February 11, 2016

 

GRAPHIC

 

4



 

consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income

 

Years ended December 31 (millions except per share amounts)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

OPERATING REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service

 

 

 

$

11,590

 

$

11,108

 

Equipment

 

 

 

840

 

819

 

Revenues arising from contracts with customers

 

 

 

12,430

 

11,927

 

Other operating income

 

6

 

72

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

12,502

 

12,002

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goods and services purchased

 

 

 

5,532

 

5,299

 

Employee benefits expense

 

7

 

2,708

 

2,487

 

Depreciation

 

16

 

1,475

 

1,423

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

17

 

434

 

411

 

 

 

 

 

10,149

 

9,620

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

 

 

2,353

 

2,382

 

Financing costs

 

8

 

447

 

456

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

 

1,906

 

1,926

 

Income taxes

 

9

 

524

 

501

 

NET INCOME

 

 

 

1,382

 

1,425

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

Items that may subsequently be reclassified to income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in unrealized fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

 

 

 

(4

)

1

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment arising from translating financial statements of foreign operations

 

 

 

25

 

10

 

Change in unrealized fair value of available-for-sale financial assets

 

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

21

 

7

 

Item never subsequently reclassified to income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee defined benefit plan re-measurements

 

 

 

445

 

(445

)

 

 

 

 

466

 

(438

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

 

$

1,848

 

$

987

 

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

 

$

2.29

 

$

2.31

 

Diluted

 

 

 

$

2.29

 

$

2.31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

 

603

 

616

 

Diluted

 

 

 

604

 

618

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

GRAPHIC

 

5



 

consolidated statements of financial position

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and temporary investments, net

 

 

 

$

223

 

$

60

 

Accounts receivable

 

25(a)

 

1,428

 

1,483

 

Income and other taxes receivable

 

 

 

1

 

97

 

Inventories

 

25(a)

 

360

 

320

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

 

213

 

199

 

Real estate joint venture advances

 

18(c)

 

66

 

 

Current derivative assets

 

4(h)

 

40

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

2,331

 

2,186

 

Non-current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

16

 

9,736

 

9,123

 

Intangible assets, net

 

17

 

9,985

 

7,797

 

Goodwill, net

 

17

 

3,761

 

3,757

 

Other long-term assets

 

25(a)

 

593

 

354

 

 

 

 

 

24,075

 

21,031

 

 

 

 

 

$

26,406

 

$

23,217

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND OWNERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

 

19

 

$

100

 

$

100

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

25(a)

 

1,990

 

2,019

 

Income and other taxes payable

 

 

 

108

 

2

 

Dividends payable

 

12

 

263

 

244

 

Advance billings and customer deposits

 

25(a)

 

760

 

753

 

Provisions

 

20

 

197

 

126

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

21

 

856

 

255

 

Current derivative liabilities

 

4(h)

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,276

 

3,499

 

Non-current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions

 

20

 

433

 

342

 

Long-term debt

 

21

 

11,182

 

9,055

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

25(a)

 

688

 

931

 

Deferred income taxes

 

9(b)

 

2,155

 

1,936

 

 

 

 

 

14,458

 

12,264

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

18,734

 

15,763

 

Owners’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common equity

 

22

 

7,672

 

7,454

 

 

 

 

 

$

26,406

 

$

23,217

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

Approved by the Directors:

 

/s/ William A. MacKinnon

 

/s/ R.H. Auchinleck

 

 

 

William A. MacKinnon

 

R.H. Auchinleck

Director

 

Director

 

GRAPHIC

 

6



 

consolidated statements of changes in owners’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Common equity

 

 

 

 

 

Equity contributed

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares (Note 22)

 

 

 

 

 

other

 

 

 

(millions except number of Common
Shares)

 

Note

 

Number of
shares

 

Share
capital

 

Contributed
surplus

 

Retained
earnings

 

comprehensive
income

 

Total

 

Balance as at January 1, 2014

 

 

 

623,432,398

 

$

5,296

 

$

149

 

$

2,539

 

$

31

 

$

8,015

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,425

 

 

1,425

 

Other comprehensive income

 

10

 

 

 

 

(445

)

7

 

(438

)

Dividends

 

12

 

 

 

 

(935

)

 

(935

)

Share option award expense

 

13(a)

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Common Shares issued pursuant to share option award net-equity settlement feature

 

13(b)

 

1,447,207

 

11

 

(11

)

 

 

 

Normal course issuer bid purchase of Common Shares

 

 

 

(15,855,171

)

(135

)

 

(480

)

 

(615

)

Liability for automatic share purchase plan commitment pursuant to normal course issuer bids for Common Shares

 

22(b)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reversal of opening liability

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

57

 

 

75

 

Recognition of closing liability

 

 

 

 

(15

)

 

(60

)

 

(75

)

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

(1

)

Balance as at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

609,024,434

 

$

5,175

 

$

141

 

$

2,100

 

$

38

 

$

7,454

 

Balance as at January 1, 2015

 

 

 

609,024,434

 

$

5,175

 

$

141

 

$

2,100

 

$

38

 

$

7,454

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,382

 

 

1,382

 

Other comprehensive income

 

10

 

 

 

 

445

 

21

 

466

 

Dividends

 

12

 

 

 

 

(1,011

)

 

(1,011

)

Share option award expense

 

13(a)

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Common Shares issued pursuant to share option award net-equity settlement feature

 

13(b)

 

885,783

 

7

 

(7

)

 

 

 

Normal course issuer bid purchase of Common Shares

 

 

 

(15,610,462

)

(133

)

 

(502

)

 

(635

)

Liability for automatic share purchase plan commitment pursuant to normal course issuer bids for Common Shares

 

22(b)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reversal of opening liability

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

60

 

 

75

 

Recognition of closing liability

 

 

 

 

(14

)

 

(46

)

 

(60

)

Balance as at December 31, 2015

 

 

 

594,299,755

 

$

5,050

 

$

135

 

$

2,428

 

$

59

 

$

7,672

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

GRAPHIC

 

7



 

consolidated statements of cash flows

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

$

1,382

 

$

1,425

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

1,909

 

1,834

 

Deferred income taxes

 

9

 

68

 

188

 

Share-based compensation expense, net

 

13(a)

 

(38

)

74

 

Net employee defined benefit plans expense

 

14(b),(g)

 

118

 

87

 

Employer contributions to employee defined benefit plans

 

 

 

(94

)

(88

)

Other

 

 

 

(17

)

(49

)

Net change in non-cash operating working capital

 

25(b)

 

214

 

(64

)

Cash provided by operating activities

 

 

 

3,542

 

3,407

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash payments for capital assets, excluding spectrum licences

 

25(b)

 

(2,522

)

(2,373

)

Cash payments for spectrum licences

 

 

 

(2,048

)

(1,171

)

Cash payments for acquisitions and related investments

 

25(b)

 

(10

)

(49

)

Real estate joint ventures advances and contributions

 

18(c)

 

(50

)

(57

)

Real estate joint venture receipts

 

18(c)

 

98

 

4

 

Proceeds on dispositions

 

 

 

52

 

7

 

Other

 

 

 

3

 

(29

)

Cash used by investing activities

 

 

 

(4,477

)

(3,668

)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid to holders of Common Shares

 

25(b)

 

(992

)

(913

)

Purchase of Common Shares for cancellation

 

22(b), 25(b)

 

(628

)

(612

)

Issuance and repayment of short-term borrowings

 

19

 

 

(300

)

Long-term debt issued

 

21, 25(b)

 

9,219

 

7,273

 

Redemptions and repayment of long-term debt

 

21, 25(b)

 

(6,486

)

(5,450

)

Other

 

 

 

(15

)

(13

)

Cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

 

 

1,098

 

(15

)

CASH POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and temporary investments, net

 

 

 

163

 

(276

)

Cash and temporary investments, net, beginning of period

 

 

 

60

 

336

 

Cash and temporary investments, net, end of period

 

 

 

$

223

 

$

60

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF OPERATING CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

25(b)

 

$

(458

)

$

(412

)

Interest received

 

 

 

$

24

 

$

2

 

Income taxes paid, net

 

 

 

$

(256

)

$

(464

)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

GRAPHIC

 

8



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

DECEMBER 31, 2015

 

TELUS Corporation is one of Canada’s largest telecommunications companies, providing a wide range of telecommunications services and products, including wireless and wireline voice and data. Data services include: Internet protocol; television; hosting, managed information technology and cloud-based services; healthcare solutions; and business process outsourcing.

 

TELUS Corporation was incorporated under the Company Act (British Columbia) on October 26, 1998, under the name BCT.TELUS Communications Inc. (BCT). On January 31, 1999, pursuant to a court-approved plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act among BCT, BC TELECOM Inc. and the former Alberta-based TELUS Corporation (TC), BCT acquired all of the shares of BC TELECOM Inc. and TC in exchange for Common Shares and Non-Voting Shares of BCT, and BC TELECOM Inc. was dissolved. On May 3, 2000, BCT changed its name to TELUS Corporation and in February 2005, TELUS Corporation transitioned under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), successor to the Company Act (British Columbia). TELUS Corporation maintains its registered office at Floor 7, 510 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6B 0M3.

 

The terms “TELUS”, “we”, “us”, “our” or “ourselves” are used to refer to TELUS Corporation and, where the context of the narrative permits or requires, its subsidiaries.

 

Notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Page

General application

 

 

1.     Summary of significant accounting policies

 

11

2.     Accounting policy developments

 

20

3.     Capital structure financial policies

 

21

4.     Financial instruments

 

23

Consolidated results of operations focused

 

 

5.     Segmented information

 

29

6.     Other operating income

 

30

7.     Employee benefits expense

 

30

8.     Financing costs

 

31

9.     Income taxes

 

31

10.   Other comprehensive income

 

32

11.   Per share amounts

 

33

12.   Dividends per share

 

33

13.   Share-based compensation

 

34

14.   Employee future benefits

 

37

15.   Restructuring and other costs

 

42

Consolidated financial position focused

 

 

16.   Property, plant and equipment

 

43

17.   Intangible assets and goodwill

 

44

18.   Real estate joint ventures

 

46

19.   Short-term borrowings

 

49

20.   Provisions

 

50

21.   Long-term debt

 

51

22.   Common Share capital

 

53

23.   Commitments and contingent liabilities

 

54

Other

 

 

24.   Related party transactions

 

57

25.   Additional financial information

 

58

 

GRAPHIC

 

9



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

1                                         summary of significant accounting policies

 

Our consolidated financial statements are expressed in Canadian dollars. The generally accepted accounting principles that we use are International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IFRS-IASB) and Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The date of our transition to IFRS-IASB was January 1, 2010, and the date of our adoption was January 1, 2011.

 

Generally accepted accounting principles require that we disclose the accounting policies we have selected in those instances where we have been obligated to choose from among various generally accepted accounting principle-compliant accounting policies. In certain other instances, including where no selection among policies is allowed, we are also required to disclose how we have applied certain accounting policies. In our assessment, all of our required accounting policy disclosures are not equally significant for us, as set out in the accompanying table; their relative significance to us will evolve over time as we do.

 

These consolidated financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, were authorized by our Board of Directors for issue on February 11, 2016.

 

 

 

Accounting policy requiring a more
significant choice among policies and/or
a more significant application of judgment

Accounting policy

 

Yes

 

No

General application

 

 

 

 

(a)         Consolidation

 

 

 

X

(b)         Use of estimates and judgments

 

X

 

 

(c)          Financial instruments — recognition and measurement

 

 

 

X

(d)         Hedge accounting

 

 

 

X

Results of operations focused

 

 

 

 

(e)          Revenue recognition

 

X

 

 

(f)           Government assistance

 

 

 

X

(g)          Cost of acquisition and advertising costs

 

 

 

X

(h)         Research and development

 

 

 

X

(i)             Leases

 

 

 

X

(j)            Depreciation, amortization and impairment

 

X

 

 

(k)         Translation of foreign currencies

 

 

 

X

(l)             Income and other taxes

 

X

 

 

(m)     Share-based compensation

 

 

 

X

(n)         Employee future benefit plans

 

X

 

 

Financial position focused

 

 

 

 

(o)         Cash and temporary investments, net

 

 

 

X

(p)         Sales of trade receivables

 

 

 

X

(q)         Inventories

 

 

 

X

(r)            Property, plant and equipment; intangible assets

 

X

 

 

(s)           Investments

 

 

 

X

 

(a)         Consolidation

 

Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of all of our subsidiaries, the principal one of which is TELUS Communications Inc., in which we have a 100% equity interest. Currently, through a 100% equity interest in each of the TELUS Communications Company partnership and the TELE-MOBILE COMPANY partnership, TELUS Communications Inc. includes substantially all of our wireless and wireline segments’ operations.

 

Our financing arrangements and those of our subsidiaries do not impose restrictions on inter-corporate dividends.

 

On a continuing basis, we review our corporate organization and effect changes as appropriate so as to enhance the value of TELUS Corporation. This process can, and does, affect which of our subsidiaries are considered principal subsidiaries at any particular point in time.

 

(b)         Use of estimates and judgments

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect: the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements; the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements; and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

GRAPHIC

 

10



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Estimates

 

Examples of the significant estimates and assumptions that we make and their relative significance and degree of difficulty are as follows:

 

 

Judgments

 

Examples of our significant judgments, apart from those involving estimation, include the following:

 

·                  Assessments about whether line items are sufficiently material to warrant separate presentation in the primary financial statements and, if not, whether they are sufficiently material to warrant separate presentation in the financial statement notes. In the normal course, we make changes to our assessments regarding presentation materiality so that they reflect current economic conditions. Due consideration is given to the view that it is reasonable to expect differing opinions of what is, and is not, material.

 

·                  In respect of revenue-generating transactions, generally we must make judgments that affect the timing of the recognition of revenue. See Note 2 for significant changes to IFRS-IASB that are not yet effective and have not yet been applied, but which will significantly affect the timing of the recognition of revenue and the classification of our revenues presented as either service or equipment.

 

·                  We must make judgments about when we have satisfied our performance obligations to our customers, satisfied either over a period of time or at a point in time. Service revenues are recognized based upon customers’ access to, or usage of, our telecommunications infrastructure; we believe this method faithfully depicts the transfer of the services and thus the revenues are recognized as the services are made available and/or rendered. We consider our performance obligations arising from the sale of equipment to have been satisfied when the equipment has been delivered and accepted by the end-user customers (see (e) following).

 

·                  Principally in the context of revenue-generating transactions involving wireless handsets, we must make judgments about whether third-party re-sellers delivering equipment to our customers are acting in the transaction as principals or as our agents. Upon due consideration of the relevant indicators, we believe the decision to consider the re-sellers to be acting, solely for accounting purposes, as our agents is more representative of the economic substance of the transactions as we are the primary obligor to the end-user customers.

 

·                  The decision to depreciate and amortize any property, plant, equipment and intangible assets that are subject to amortization on a straight-line basis, as we believe that this method reflects the consumption of resources related to the economic lifespan of those assets better than an accelerated method and is more representative of the economic substance of the underlying use of those assets.

 

GRAPHIC

 

11



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

·                  The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make judgments that affect the financial statement disclosure of information regularly reviewed by our chief operating decision-maker used to make resource allocation decisions and to assess performance (segmented information, Note 5). A significant judgment we make is that our wireless and wireline operations and cash flows are sufficiently distinct to be considered both operating segments and reportable segments, notwithstanding the convergence our wireless and wireline telecommunications infrastructure technology and operations have experienced to date. If our wireless and wireline telecommunications infrastructure technology and operations continue to converge, it may become impractical, if not impossible, to objectively distinguish between our wireless and wireline operations and cash flows; if sufficient convergence were to occur, our wireless and wireline operations would no longer be individual components of the business or discrete operating segments; rather, they could each become a group of similar products and services.

 

As well, if it were to become impractical to distinguish between our wireless and wireline cash flows, which would be evidence of their interdependence, this could result in the unification of the current wireless cash-generating unit and the current wireline cash-generating unit as a single cash-generating unit for impairment testing purposes.

 

·                  The view that our spectrum licences granted by the Canadian Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development (formerly Industry Canada) will likely be renewed by the Canadian Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development; that we intend to renew them; that we believe we have the financial and operational ability to renew them; and thus, they have an indefinite life, as discussed further in Note 17(b).

 

·                  In connection with the annual impairment testing of intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill, there are instances where we must exercise judgment in allocating our net assets, including shared corporate and administrative assets, to our cash-generating units when determining their carrying amounts. These judgments are necessary because of the convergence our wireless and wireline telecommunications infrastructure technology and operations have experienced to date, and our continuous development. There are instances where similar judgments must also be made in respect of future capital expenditures in support of both wireless and wireline operations, which are a component of the discounted cash flow projections that are used in the annual impairment testing, as discussed further in Note 17(c).

 

·                  In respect of claims and lawsuits, as discussed further in Note 23(c), the determination of whether an item is a contingent liability or whether an outflow of resources is probable and thus needs to be accounted for as a provision.

 

(c)          Financial instruments — recognition and measurement

 

In respect of the recognition and measurement of financial instruments, we have adopted the following policies:

 

 

 

Accounting classification

Financial instrument

 

Fair value
through net
income 
1, 2

 

Loans and
receivables

 

Available-
for-sale 
3

 

Amortized
cost

 

Part of a cash
flow hedging
relationship 
3

Measured at amortized cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction credit facilities advances to real estate joint ventures

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term obligations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Accounts payable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Provisions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and temporary investments

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term investments (not subject to significant influence) 4

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange derivatives

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

Share-based compensation derivatives

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 


(1)         Classification includes financial instruments held for trading. Certain qualifying financial instruments that are not required to be classified as held for trading may be classified as held for trading if we so choose.

(2)         Unrealized changes in the fair values of financial instruments are included in net income.

(3)         Unrealized changes in the fair values of financial instruments classified as available-for-sale, or the effective portion of unrealized changes in the fair values of financial instruments held for hedging, are included in other comprehensive income.

(4)         Long-term investments over which we do not have significant influence are classified as available-for-sale. In respect of investments in securities for which the fair values can be reliably measured, we determine the classification on an instrument-by-instrument basis at the time of initial recognition.

 

·                  Trade receivables that may be sold to an arm’s-length securitization trust are accounted for as loans and receivables. We have selected this classification as the benefits of selecting the available-for-sale classification were not expected to exceed the costs of selecting and implementing that classification.

 

GRAPHIC

 

12



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

·                  Long-term investments over which we do not have significant influence are accounted for as available-for-sale. We have selected this classification as we believe that it better reflects management’s investment intentions.

 

·                  Derivatives that are part of an established and documented cash flow hedging relationship are accounted for as held for hedging. We believe that classification as held for hedging results in a better matching of the change in the fair value of the derivative financial instrument with the risk exposure being hedged.

 

In respect of hedges of anticipated transactions, which in our specific instance may include those related to inventory purchase commitments, hedge gains/losses will be included in the cost of the inventory and will be expensed when the inventory is sold. We have selected this method as we believe that it results in a better matching with the risk exposure being hedged.

 

Derivatives that are not part of a documented cash flow hedging relationship are accounted for as held for trading and thus are measured at fair value through net income.

 

·                  Regular-way purchases or sales of financial assets or financial liabilities (purchases or sales that require actual delivery of financial assets or financial liabilities) are recognized on the settlement date. We have selected this method as the benefits of using the trade date method were not expected to exceed the costs of selecting and implementing that method.

 

·                  Transaction costs, other than in respect of items held for trading, are added to the initial fair value of the acquired financial asset or financial liability. We have selected this method as we believe that it results in a better matching of the transaction costs with the periods benefiting from the transaction costs.

 

(d)         Hedge accounting

 

General

 

We apply hedge accounting to the financial instruments used to: establish designated currency hedging relationships for certain U.S. dollar denominated future purchase commitments and debt repayments, as set out in Note 4(d); and fix the compensation cost arising from specific grants of restricted stock units, as set out in Note 4(f) and further discussed in Note 13(c).

 

Hedge accounting

 

The purpose of hedge accounting, in respect of our designated hedging relationships, is to ensure that counterbalancing gains and losses are recognized in the same periods. We have chosen to apply hedge accounting as we believe this is more representative of the economic substance of the underlying transactions.

 

In order to apply hedge accounting, a high correlation (which indicates effectiveness) is required in the offsetting changes in the values of the financial instruments (the hedging items) used to establish the designated hedging relationships and all, or a part, of the asset, liability or transaction having an identified risk exposure that we have taken steps to modify (the hedged items). We assess the anticipated effectiveness of designated hedging relationships at inception and their actual effectiveness for each reporting period thereafter. We consider a designated hedging relationship to be effective if the following critical terms match between the hedging item and the hedged item: the notional amount of the hedging item and the principal amount of the hedged item; maturity dates; payment dates; and interest rate index (if, and as, applicable). As set out in Note 4(i), any ineffectiveness, such as would result from a difference between the notional amount of the hedging item and the principal amount of the hedged item, or from a previously effective designated hedging relationship becoming ineffective, is reflected in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as Financing costs if in respect of long-term debt, as Goods and services purchased if in respect of U.S. dollar denominated future purchase commitments or as Employee benefits expense if in respect of share-based compensation.

 

Hedging assets and liabilities

 

In the application of hedge accounting, an amount (the hedge value) is recorded in the Consolidated statements of financial position in respect of the fair value of the hedging items. The net difference, if any, between the amounts recognized in the determination of net income and the amounts necessary to reflect the fair value of the designated cash flow hedging items recorded in the Consolidated statements of financial position is recognized as a component of Other comprehensive income, as set out in Note 10.

 

In the application of hedge accounting to the compensation cost arising from share-based compensation, the amount recognized in the determination of net income is the amount that counterbalances the difference between the quoted market price of our Common Shares at the statement of financial position date and the price of our Common Shares in the hedging items.

 

GRAPHIC

 

13



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(e)          Revenue recognition

 

General

 

We earn the majority of our revenues (wireless: network revenues (voice and data); wireline: data revenues (which include: Internet protocol; television; hosting, managed information technology and cloud-based services; business process outsourcing; and certain healthcare solutions) and voice revenues) from access to, and usage of, our telecommunications infrastructure. The majority of the balance of our revenues (wireless equipment and other) arises from providing services and products facilitating access to, and usage of, our telecommunications infrastructure.

 

We offer complete and integrated solutions to meet our customers’ needs. These solutions may involve deliveries of multiple services and products that occur at different points in time and/or over different periods of time; as referred to in (b), this is a significant judgment for us. As appropriate, these multiple element arrangements are separated into their component accounting units, consideration is measured and allocated among the accounting units based upon their relative fair values (derived using Company-specific objective evidence) and then our relevant revenue recognition policies are applied to the accounting units. (We estimate that more than two-thirds of our revenues arise from multiple element arrangements.) A limitation cap restricts the consideration allocated to services or products currently transferred in multiple element arrangements to an amount that is not contingent upon either delivering additional items or meeting other specified performance conditions. Our view is that the limitation cap results in a faithful depiction of the transfer of services and products, as it reflects the telecommunications industry’s generally accepted understanding of the transfer of services and products, while also reflecting the related cash flows; however, a new revenue accounting standard, which has not yet been applied and must be adopted by January 1, 2018, prohibits the use of a limitation cap, as discussed further in Note 2.

 

Multiple contracts with a single customer are normally accounted for as separate arrangements. In instances where multiple contracts are entered into with a customer in a short period of time, the contracts are reviewed as a group to ensure that, as with multiple element arrangements, their relative fair values are appropriate.

 

Lease accounting is applied to an accounting unit if it conveys to a customer the right to use a specific asset but does not convey the risks and/or benefits of ownership.

 

Our revenues are recorded net of any value-added, sales and/or use taxes billed to the customer concurrent with a revenue-generating transaction.

 

When we receive no identifiable, separable benefit for consideration given to a customer (e.g. discounts and rebates), the consideration is recorded as a reduction of revenue rather than as an expense.

 

Voice and data

 

We recognize revenues on an accrual basis and include an estimate of revenues earned but unbilled. Wireless and wireline service revenues are recognized based upon access to, and usage of, our telecommunications infrastructure and upon contract fees.

 

Advance billings are recorded when billing occurs prior to provision of the associated services; such advance billings are recognized as revenue in the period in which the services are provided. Similarly, and as appropriate, upfront customer activation and connection fees are deferred and recognized over the average expected term of the customer relationship.

 

We use the liability method of accounting for the amounts of our quality of service rate rebates that arise from the jurisdiction of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC).

 

The CRTC has established a mechanism to subsidize local exchange carriers, such as ourselves, that provide residential basic telephone service to high cost serving areas. The CRTC has determined the per network access line/per band subsidy rate for all local exchange carriers. We recognize the subsidy on an accrual basis by applying the subsidy rate to the number of residential network access lines we provide in high cost serving areas, as further discussed in Note 6. Differences, if any, between interim and final subsidy rates set by the CRTC are accounted for as a change in estimate in the period in which the CRTC finalizes the subsidy rate.

 

Other and wireless equipment

 

We recognize product revenues, including amounts related to wireless handsets sold to re-sellers and customer premises equipment, when the products are delivered and accepted by the end-user customers. With respect to wireless handsets sold to re-sellers, we consider ourselves to be the principal and primary obligor to the end-user customer. Revenues from operating leases of equipment are recognized on a systematic and rational basis (normally a straight-line basis) over the term of the lease.

 

Non-high cost serving area deferral account

 

In an effort to foster competition for residential basic service in non-high cost serving areas, the concept of a deferral account mechanism was introduced by the CRTC in 2002 as an alternative to mandating price reductions. We use the

 

GRAPHIC

 

14



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

liability method of accounting for the deferral account. We discharge the deferral account liability by undertaking qualifying actions. We recognize the amortization (over a period no longer than three years) of a proportionate share of the deferral account as qualifying actions are completed. Such amortization is included as a component of government assistance in Other operating income, as set out in Note 6.

 

(f)           Government assistance

 

We recognize government assistance amounts on an accrual basis as the subsidized services are provided or as the subsidized costs are incurred. As set out in Note 6, government assistance amounts are included in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as Other operating income.

 

(g)         Cost of acquisition and advertising costs

 

The total cost of wireless hardware sold to customers and any commissions and advertising and promotion costs related to the initial customer acquisition are expensed as incurred; the cost of hardware we own that is situated at customers’ premises and associated installation costs are capitalized as incurred. Costs of acquiring customers that are expensed are included in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as a component of Goods and services purchased, with the exception of amounts paid to our employees, which are included as Employee benefits expense. Costs of advertising production, advertising airtime and advertising space are expensed as incurred.

 

(h)         Research and development

 

Research and development costs are expensed except in cases where development costs meet certain identifiable criteria for capitalization. Capitalized development costs are amortized over the life of the related commercial production, or in the case of serviceable property, plant and equipment, are included in the appropriate property group and are depreciated over its estimated useful life.

 

(i)            Leases

 

Leases are classified as finance or operating depending upon the terms and conditions of the contracts. See Note 2 for significant changes to IFRS-IASB that are not yet effective and have not yet been applied, but will significantly affect the timing of the recognition of operating lease expenses, their recognition on the Consolidated statement of financial position, as well as their classification in both the Consolidated statement of income and other comprehensive income and the Consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

Where we are the lessee, asset values recorded under finance leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of expected use. Obligations recorded under finance leases are reduced by lease payments net of imputed interest.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015, real estate and vehicle operating lease expenses, which are net of the amortization of deferred gains on the sale-leaseback of buildings and the occupancy costs associated with leased real estate, were $227 million (2014 — $222 million); occupancy costs associated with leased real estate totalled $88 million (2014 — $85 million).

 

(j)            Depreciation, amortization and impairment

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

Assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives as determined by a continuing program of asset life studies. Depreciation includes amortization of assets under finance leases and amortization of leasehold improvements. Leasehold improvements are normally amortized over the lesser of their expected average service life or the term of the lease. Intangible assets with finite lives (intangible assets subject to amortization) are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which are reviewed at least annually and adjusted as appropriate. As referred to in (b), the use of a straight-line basis of depreciation and amortization is a significant judgment for us.

 

Estimated useful lives for the majority of our property, plant and equipment subject to depreciation are as follows:

 

 

 

Estimated useful lives 1

 

Network assets

 

 

 

Outside plant

 

17 to 40 years

 

Inside plant

 

4 to 17 years

 

Wireless site equipment

 

5 to 10 years

 

Balance of depreciable property, plant and equipment

 

3 to 40 years

 

 


(1)         The composite depreciation rate for the year ended December 31, 2015, was 4.8% (2014 — 4.8%). The rate is calculated by dividing depreciation expense by an average of the gross book value of depreciable assets over the reporting period.

 

GRAPHIC

 

15



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Estimated useful lives for the majority of our intangible assets subject to amortization are as follows:

 

 

 

Estimated useful lives

 

Wireline subscriber base

 

25 years

 

Customer contracts, related customer relationships and leasehold interests

 

6 to 10 years

 

Software

 

2 to 7 years

 

Access to rights-of-way and other

 

5 to 30 years

 

 

Impairment — general

 

Impairment testing compares the carrying values of the assets or cash-generating units being tested with their recoverable amounts (the recoverable amount being the greater of an asset’s or a cash-generating unit’s value in use or its fair value less costs to sell); as referred to in (b), this is a significant estimate for us. Impairment losses are immediately recognized to the extent that the carrying value of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount. Should the recoverable amounts for impaired assets or cash-generating units subsequently increase, the impairment losses previously recognized (other than in respect of goodwill) may be reversed to the extent that the reversal is not a result of “unwinding of the discount” and that the resulting carrying values do not exceed the carrying values that would have been the result if no impairment losses had been previously recognized.

 

Impairment — property, plant and equipment; intangible assets subject to amortization

 

The continuing program of asset life studies considers such items as the timing of technological obsolescence, competitive pressures and future infrastructure utilization plans; these considerations could also indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If the carrying value of an asset were not considered recoverable, an impairment loss would be recorded.

 

Impairment — intangible assets with indefinite lives; goodwill

 

The carrying values of intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill are periodically tested for impairment. The frequency of the impairment testing is generally the reciprocal of the stability of the relevant events and circumstances, but intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill must, at a minimum, be tested annually; we have selected December as our annual test date.

 

We assess our intangible assets with indefinite lives by comparing the recoverable amounts of our cash-generating units to the carrying values of our cash-generating units (including the intangible assets with indefinite lives allocated to a cash-generating unit, but excluding any goodwill allocated to a cash-generating unit). To the extent that the carrying value of a cash-generating unit (including the intangible assets with indefinite lives allocated to the cash-generating unit, but excluding any goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit) exceeds its recoverable amount, the excess amount would be recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of intangible assets with indefinite lives.

 

Subsequent to assessing our intangible assets with indefinite lives, we then assess our goodwill by comparing the recoverable amounts of our cash-generating units to the carrying values of our cash-generating units (including the intangible assets with indefinite lives and the goodwill allocated to a cash-generating unit). To the extent that the carrying value of the cash-generating unit (including the intangible assets with indefinite lives and the goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit) exceeds its recoverable amount, the excess amount would first be recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of goodwill and any remainder would be recorded as a reduction in the carrying values of the assets of the cash-generating unit on a pro-rated basis.

 

We have determined that our current cash-generating units are our currently reportable segments, wireless and wireline, as the reportable segments, which are also our operating segments (see Note 5), are the smallest identifiable groups of assets that generate net cash inflows which are largely independent of each other.

 

(k)         Translation of foreign currencies

 

Trade transactions completed in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing at the time of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at the rate of exchange in effect at the statement of financial position date, with any resulting gain or loss recorded in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as a component of Financing costs, as set out in Note 8. Hedge accounting is applied in specific instances, as further discussed in (d) preceding.

 

We have foreign subsidiaries that do not have the Canadian dollar as their functional currency. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the translation of these foreign subsidiaries’ accounts into Canadian dollars subsequent to January 1, 2010, are reported as a component of other comprehensive income, as set out in Note 10.

 

(l)            Income and other taxes

 

We follow the liability method of accounting for income taxes; as referred to in (b), this is a significant estimate for us. Under this method, current income taxes are recognized for the estimated income taxes payable for the current year.

 

GRAPHIC

 

16



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between the tax and accounting bases of assets and liabilities, and also for the benefit of losses and Investment Tax Credits available to be carried forward to future years for tax purposes that are more likely than not to be realized. The amounts recognized in respect of deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based upon the expected timing of the reversal of temporary differences or usage of tax losses and application of the substantively enacted tax rates at the time of reversal or usage.

 

We account for any changes in substantively enacted income tax rates affecting deferred income tax assets and liabilities in full in the period in which the changes are substantively enacted. We account for changes in the estimates of prior year(s) tax balances as estimate revisions in the period in which the changes in estimates arise; we have selected this approach as its emphasis on the statement of financial position is more consistent with the liability method of accounting for income taxes.

 

Our operations are complex and the related tax interpretations, regulations and legislation are continually changing. As a result, there are usually some tax matters in question that result in uncertain tax positions. We only recognize the income tax benefit of an uncertain tax position when it is more likely than not that the ultimate determination of the tax treatment of the position will result in that benefit being realized. We accrue an amount for interest charges on current tax liabilities that have not been funded, which would include interest and penalties arising from uncertain tax positions. We include such charges in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as a component of Financing costs.

 

Our research and development activities may be eligible to earn Investment Tax Credits, for which the determination of eligibility is a complex matter. We only recognize Investment Tax Credits when there is reasonable assurance that the ultimate determination of the eligibility of our research and development activities will result in the Investment Tax Credits being received, at which time they are accounted for using the cost reduction method, whereby such credits are deducted from the expenditures or assets to which they relate, as set out in Note 9(c).

 

(m)     Share-based compensation

 

General

 

When share-based compensation vests in its entirety at one future point in time (cliff vesting), we recognize the expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. When share-based compensation vests in tranches (graded vesting), we recognize the expense using the accelerated expense attribution method. An estimate of forfeitures during the vesting period is made at the date of grant; this estimate is adjusted to reflect actual experience.

 

Share option awards

 

For share option awards granted after 2001, a fair value is determined at the date of grant and that fair value is recognized in the financial statements. Proceeds arising from the exercise of share option awards are credited to share capital, as are the recognized grant-date fair values of the exercised share option awards.

 

Share option awards that have a net-equity settlement feature, as set out in Note 13(b), are accounted for as equity instruments. We have selected the equity instrument fair value method of accounting for the net-equity settlement feature as it is consistent with the accounting treatment afforded to the associated share option awards.

 

Restricted stock units

 

In respect of restricted stock units without market performance conditions, as set out in Note 13(c), we accrue a liability equal to the product of the number of vesting restricted stock units multiplied by the fair market value of the corresponding Common Shares at the end of the reporting period (unless hedge accounting is applied, as set out in (d) preceding). Similarly, we accrue a liability for the notional subset of our restricted stock units with market performance conditions using a fair value determined using a Monte Carlo simulation. The expense for restricted stock units that do not ultimately vest is reversed against the expense that was previously recorded in their respect.

 

(n)         Employee future benefit plans

 

Defined benefit plans

 

We accrue amounts for our obligations under employee defined benefit plans, and the related costs, net of plan assets. The cost of pensions and other retirement benefits earned by employees is actuarially determined using the accrued benefit method pro-rated on service and management’s best estimates of salary escalation and the retirement ages of employees. In the determination of net income, net interest for each plan, which is the product of the plan’s surplus (deficit) multiplied by the discount rate, is included as a component of Financing costs, as set out in Note 8.

 

An amount reflecting the effect of differences between the discount rate and the actual rate of return on plan assets is included as a component of employee defined benefit plan re-measurements within Other comprehensive income, as set out in Note 10 and Note 14. We determine the maximum economic benefit available from the plans’ assets on the basis of reductions in future contributions to the plans.

 

GRAPHIC

 

17



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

On an annual basis, at a minimum, the defined benefit plan key assumptions are assessed and revised as appropriate; as referred to in (b), these are significant estimates for us. When the defined benefit plan key assumptions fluctuate significantly relative to their immediately preceding year-end values, actuarial gains (losses) arising from such significant fluctuations are recognized on an interim basis.

 

Defined contribution plans

 

We use defined contribution accounting for the Telecommunication Workers Pension Plan and the British Columbia Public Service Pension Plan, which cover certain of our employees and provide defined benefits to their members. In the absence of any regulations governing the calculation of the share of the underlying financial position and plan performance attributable to each employer-participant, and in the absence of contractual agreements between the plans and the employer-participants related to the financing of any shortfall (or distribution of any surplus), we account for these plans as defined contribution plans in accordance with International Accounting Standard 19, Employee Benefits.

 

(o)         Cash and temporary investments, net

 

Cash and temporary investments, which may include investments in money market instruments that are purchased three months or less from maturity, are presented net of outstanding items, including cheques written but not cleared by the related banks as at the statement of financial position date. Cash and temporary investments, net, are classified as a liability in the statement of financial position when the amount of the cheques written but not cleared by the related banks exceeds the amount of cash and temporary investments. When cash and temporary investments, net, are classified as a liability, they may also include overdraft amounts drawn on our bilateral bank facilities, which revolve daily and are discussed further in Note 19.

 

(p)         Sales of trade receivables

 

Sales of trade receivables in securitization transactions are recognized as collateralized short-term borrowings and thus do not result in our de-recognition of the trade receivables sold.

 

(q)         Inventories

 

Our inventories consist primarily of wireless handsets, parts and accessories and communications equipment held for resale. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value, with cost being determined on an average cost basis. Previous write-downs to net realizable value are reversed if there is a subsequent increase in the value of the related inventories.

 

(r)          Property, plant and equipment; intangible assets

 

General

 

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are recorded at historical cost, which for self-constructed property, plant and equipment includes materials, direct labour and applicable overhead costs. For internally developed, internal-use software, recorded historical cost includes materials, direct labour and direct labour-related costs. Where property, plant and equipment construction projects are of a sufficient size and duration, an amount is capitalized for the cost of funds used to finance construction, as set out in Note 8. The rate for calculating the capitalized financing cost is based on our weighted average cost of borrowing experienced during the reporting period.

 

When we sell property, plant and/or equipment, the net book value is netted against the sale proceeds and the difference, as set out in Note 6, is included in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as Other operating income.

 

Asset retirement obligations

 

Provisions for liabilities, as set out in Note 20, are recognized for statutory, contractual or legal obligations, normally when incurred, associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment (primarily certain items of outside plant and wireless site equipment) when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or normal operation of the assets; as referred to in (b), this is a significant estimate for us. The obligations are measured initially at fair value, determined using present value methodology, and the resulting costs are capitalized as a part of the carrying value of the related asset. In subsequent periods, the liability is adjusted for the accretion of discount, for any changes in the market-based discount rate and for any changes in the amount or timing of the underlying future cash flows. The capitalized asset retirement cost is depreciated on the same basis as the related asset and the discount accretion, as set out in Note 8, is included in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as a component of Financing costs.

 

GRAPHIC

 

18



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(s)           Investments

 

We account for our investments in companies over which we have significant influence using the equity method of accounting, whereby the investments are initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted to recognize our share of earnings or losses of the investee companies and any earnings distributions received. The excess of the cost of an equity investment over its underlying book value at the date of acquisition, except for goodwill, is amortized over the estimated useful lives of the underlying assets to which the excess cost is attributed.

 

Similarly, we account for our interests in the real estate joint ventures, discussed further in Note 18, using the equity method of accounting. Unrealized gains and losses from transactions with (including contributions to) the real estate joint ventures are deferred in proportion to our remaining interest in the real estate joint ventures.

 

We account for our other investments as available-for-sale at their fair values unless they are investment securities that do not have quoted market prices in an active market or do not have other clear and objective evidence of fair value. When we do not account for our available-for-sale investments at their fair values, we use the cost basis of accounting whereby the investments are initially recorded at cost and earnings from those investments are recognized only to the extent received or receivable. The costs of investments sold or the amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income to earnings are determined on a specific-identification basis.

 

Unless there is a significant or prolonged decline in the value of an available-for-sale investment, the carrying values of available-for-sale investments are adjusted to their estimated fair values, and the amount of any such adjustment would be included in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as a component of other comprehensive income. When there is a significant or prolonged decline in the value of an investment, the carrying value of any such investment accounted for using the equity, available-for-sale or cost method is reduced to its estimated fair value, and the amount of any such reduction would be included in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as Other operating income.

 

2                 accounting policy developments

 

Standards, interpretations and amendments to standards not yet effective and not yet applied

 

Based upon current facts and circumstances, we do not expect to be materially affected by the application of the following standards, unless otherwise indicated, and we are currently determining which date(s) we will select for initial compliance if earlier than the required compliance dates.

 

·                  Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2012-2014 Cycle are required to be applied for years beginning on or after January 1, 2016.

 

·                  IFRS 9, Financial Instruments, is required to be applied for years beginning on or after January 1, 2018.

 

·                  IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, is required to be applied for years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, such date reflecting the one-year deferral approved by the International Accounting Standards Board on July 22, 2015. The International Accounting Standards Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Board of the United States worked on this joint project to clarify the principles for the recognition of revenue and to develop the common revenue standard. The new standard was released in May 2014 and supersedes existing standards and interpretations including IAS 18, Revenue. We are currently assessing the impacts and transition provisions of the new standard.

 

The effects of the new standard and the materiality of those effects will vary by industry and entity. Like many other telecommunications companies, we currently expect to be materially affected by its application, primarily in respect of the timing of revenue recognition, the classification of revenue, the capitalization of costs of obtaining a contract with a customer and possibly the capitalization of the costs of contract fulfilment (as defined by the new standard). The timing of revenue recognition and the classification of our revenues as either service revenues or equipment revenues will be affected, since the allocation of consideration in multiple element arrangements (solutions for our customers that may involve deliveries of multiple services and products that occur at different points in time and/or over different periods of time) will no longer be affected by the current limitation cap methodology.

 

The effects of the timing of revenue recognition and the classification of revenue are expected to be most pronounced in our wireless segment. Although the measurement of the total revenue recognized over the life of a contract will be largely unaffected by the new standard, the prohibition of the use of the limitation cap methodology will accelerate the recognition of total contract revenue, relative to both the associated cash inflows from customers and our current practice (using the limitation cap methodology). The acceleration of the recognition of contract revenue relative to the associated cash inflows will also result in the recognition of an amount reflecting the resulting difference as an asset. Although the underlying transaction economics would not differ, during periods of sustained

 

GRAPHIC

 

19



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

growth in the number of wireless subscriber connection additions, assuming comparable contract-lifetime per unit cash inflows, revenues would appear to be greater than under current practice (using the limitation cap methodology). Wireline segment results arising from transactions that include the initial provision of subsidized hardware or promotional pricing plans will be similarly affected.

 

Similarly, the measurement of the total costs of contract acquisition and contract fulfilment over the life of a contract will be unaffected by the new standard. The new standard will result in our wireless and wireline segments’ costs of contract acquisition and contract fulfilment, to the extent that they are material, being capitalized and subsequently recognized as an expense over the life of a contract on a rational, systematic basis consistent with the pattern of the transfer of goods or services to which the asset relates. Although the underlying transaction economics would not differ, during periods of sustained growth in the number of customer connection additions, assuming comparable per unit costs of contract acquisition and contract fulfilment, absolute profitability measures would appear to be greater than under the current practice of immediately expensing such costs.

 

Our operations and associated systems are complex and our accounting for millions of multi-year contracts with our customers will be affected. Significantly, in order to effect the associated accounting, incremental compilation of historical data will be necessary for the millions of already existing multi-year contracts with our customers that are expected to be in-scope for purposes of transitioning to the new standard. Our current estimate of the time and effort necessary to develop and implement the accounting policies, estimates, judgments and processes (including incremental requirements of our information technology systems) we will need to have in place in order to comply with the new standard extends into mid-2017. As a result, at this time, it is not possible to make reasonable quantitative estimates of the effects of the new standard.

 

·                  In January 2016 the International Accounting Standards Board released IFRS 16, Leases, which is required to be applied for years beginning on or after January 1, 2019, and which supersedes IAS 17, Leases. The International Accounting Standards Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Board of the United States worked together to improve the accounting for leases, generally by eliminating lessees’ classification of leases as either operating leases or finance leases and, for IFRS-IASB, introducing a single lessee accounting model.

 

The most significant effect of the new standard will be the lessee’s recognition of the initial present value of unavoidable future lease payments as lease assets and lease liabilities on the statement of financial position, including for most leases which would be currently accounted for as operating leases. Leases with durations of 12 months or less and leases for low-value assets are both exempted. As set out in Note 23(a), we currently have significant operating lease commitments.

 

The measurement of the total lease expense over the term of a lease will be unaffected by the new standard. However, the new standard will result in the timing of lease expense recognition being accelerated for leases which would be currently accounted for as operating leases; the International Accounting Standards Board expects that this effect may be muted by a lessee having a portfolio of leases with varying maturities and lengths of term. The presentation on the statement of income and other comprehensive income required by the new standard will result in most lease expenses being presented as amortization of lease assets and financing costs arising from lease liabilities rather than as being a part of goods and services purchased.

 

Relative to the results of applying the current standard, the lessee’s statement of cash flows will reflect increased operating activity cash flows equally offset by decreased financing activity cash flows due to the payment of the “principal” component of leases, which would be currently accounted for as operating leases, being presented as a cash flow use within financing activities under the new standard.

 

We are currently assessing the impacts and transition provisions of the new standard, but we expect that our Consolidated statement of financial position will be materially affected, as will be debt-related and operation-related financial metrics. At this time it is not possible to make reasonable quantitative estimates of the effects of the new standard.

 

3                 capital structure financial policies

 

Our objective when managing capital is to maintain a flexible capital structure that optimizes the cost and availability of capital at acceptable risk.

 

In the management of capital and in its definition, we include common equity (excluding accumulated other comprehensive income), long-term debt (including long-term credit facilities, commercial paper backstopped by long-term credit facilities and any hedging assets or liabilities associated with long-term debt items, net of amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income), cash and temporary investments, and short-term borrowings arising from securitized trade receivables.

 

GRAPHIC

 

20



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

We manage our capital structure and make adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of our telecommunications infrastructure. In order to maintain or adjust our capital structure, we may adjust the amount of dividends paid to holders of Common Shares, purchase Common Shares for cancellation pursuant to normal course issuer bids, issue new shares, issue new debt, issue new debt to replace existing debt with different characteristics and/or increase or decrease the amount of trade receivables sold to an arm’s-length securitization trust.

 

We monitor capital utilizing a number of measures, including: net debt to earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA*) — excluding restructuring and other costs; and dividend payout ratios.

 

Net debt to EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs is calculated as net debt at the end of the period divided by 12-month trailing EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs. This measure, historically, is substantially similar to the leverage ratio covenant in our credit facilities. Net debt, EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs and adjusted net earnings are measures that do not have any standardized meanings prescribed by IFRS-IASB and are therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The calculation of these measures is as set out in the following table. Net debt is one component of a ratio used to determine compliance with debt covenants.

 

The dividend payout ratio presented is a historical measure calculated as the sum of the last four quarterly dividends declared per Common Share, as recorded in the financial statements, divided by the sum of basic earnings per share for the most recent four quarters for interim reporting periods (divided by annual basic earnings per share if the reported amount is in respect of a fiscal year). The dividend payout ratio of adjusted net earnings presented, also a historical measure, differs in that it excludes long-term debt prepayment premium and income tax-related adjustments.

 

During 2015, our financial objectives, which are reviewed annually and which were unchanged from 2014 other than for a revision to our debt ratio long-term objective, included maintaining the financial objectives set out in the following table. We believe that our financial objectives are supportive of our long-term strategy.

 

As at, or 12-month periods ended, December 31 ($ in millions)

 

Objective

 

2015

 

2014

 

Components of debt and coverage ratios

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net debt 1

 

 

 

$

11,953

 

$

9,393

 

EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs 2

 

 

 

$

4,488

 

$

4,291

 

Net interest cost 3

 

 

 

$

465

 

$

453

 

Debt ratio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net debt to EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs

 

2.00 – 2.50 4

 

2.66

 

2.19

 

Coverage ratios

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings coverage 5

 

 

 

4.8

 

5.3

 

EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs interest coverage 6

 

 

 

9.7

 

9.5

 

Other measures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend payout ratio of adjusted net earnings 7

 

 

 

73

%

66

%

Dividend payout ratio

 

65%–75% 8

 

73

%

66

%

 


(1)         Net debt is calculated as follows:

 

As at December 31

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Long-term debt

 

21

 

$

12,038

 

$

9,310

 

Debt issuance costs netted against long-term debt

 

 

 

52

 

43

 

Derivative assets, net

 

 

 

(14

)

 

Cash and temporary investments, net

 

 

 

(223

)

(60

)

Short-term borrowings

 

19

 

100

 

100

 

Net debt

 

 

 

$

11,953

 

$

9,393

 

 

(2)         EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs is calculated as follows:

 

Years ended December 31

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

EBITDA

 

5

 

$

4,262

 

$

4,216

 

Restructuring and other costs

 

15

 

226

 

75

 

EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs

 

 

 

$

4,488

 

$

4,291

 

 

(3)         Net interest cost is defined as financing costs, excluding employee defined benefit plans net interest and recoveries on long-term debt prepayment premium and repayment of debt, calculated on a 12-month trailing basis (expenses recorded for long-term debt prepayment premium, if any, are included in net interest cost).

 

(4)         Our long-term objective range for this ratio is 2.00 — 2.50 times. The ratio as at December 31, 2015, is outside the long-term objective range. In the short term, we may permit this ratio to go outside the objective range (for long-term investment opportunities), but will endeavor to return this ratio to within the objective range in the medium term, as we believe that this range is supportive of our long-term strategy. We are well in compliance with our credit facilities leverage ratio covenant which states that we may not permit our net debt to operating cash flow ratio to exceed 4.00:1.00 (see Note 21(d)); the calculation of the debt ratio is substantially similar to the calculation of the leverage ratio covenant in our credit facilities.

 

* EBITDA does not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS-IASB and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers; we define EBITDA as operating revenues less goods and services purchased and employee benefits expense. We have issued guidance on, and report, EBITDA because it is a key measure that management uses to evaluate the performance of our business, and it is also utilized in measuring compliance with certain debt covenants.

 

GRAPHIC

 

21



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(5)         Earnings coverage is defined as net income before borrowing costs and income tax expense, divided by borrowing costs (interest on long-term debt; interest on short-term borrowings and other; long-term debt prepayment premium); and adding back capitalized interest.

 

(6)         EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs interest coverage is defined as EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs divided by net interest cost. This measure is substantially similar to the coverage ratio covenant in our credit facilities.

 

(7)         Adjusted net earnings attributable to Common Shares is calculated as follows:

 

12-month periods ended December 31

 

2015

 

2014

 

Net income

 

$

1,382

 

$

1,425

 

Long-term debt prepayment premium, after income tax

 

 

10

 

Income tax-related adjustments

 

1

 

(6

)

Adjusted net earnings attributable to Common Shares

 

$

1,383

 

$

1,429

 

 

(8)         Our target guideline for the dividend payout ratio is 65%—75% of sustainable earnings on a prospective basis.

 

Net debt to EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs was 2.66 times at December 31, 2015, up from 2.19 times one year earlier. The increase in net debt, primarily due to the purchase of spectrum licences (see Note 17(a)), was partly offset by growth in EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs. The earnings coverage ratio for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015, was 4.8 times, down from 5.3 times one year earlier. Higher borrowing costs reduced the ratio by 0.4, while a decline in income before borrowing costs and income taxes reduced the ratio by 0.1. The EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs interest coverage ratio for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015, was 9.7 times, up from 9.5 times one year earlier. Growth in EBITDA — excluding restructuring and other costs increased the ratio by 0.4, while an increase in net interest costs reduced the ratio by 0.2.

 

4                 financial instruments

 

(a)         Risks — overview

 

Our financial instruments, and the nature of certain risks to which they may be subject are as set out in the following table.

 

 

 

Risks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market risks

 

Financial instrument

 

Credit

 

Liquidity

 

Currency

 

Interest rate

 

Other price

 

Measured at amortized cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

Construction credit facilities advances to real estate joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

Short-term obligations

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions (including restructuring accounts payable)

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

Measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and temporary investments

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

Long-term investments (not subject to significant influence) 1

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

Foreign exchange derivatives 2

 

X

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

Share-based compensation derivatives 2

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 


(1)         Long-term investments over which we do not have significant influence are measured at fair value if those fair values can be reliably measured.

(2)         Use of derivative financial instruments is subject to a policy which requires that no derivative transaction is to be entered into for the purpose of establishing a speculative or leveraged position (the corollary being that all derivative transactions are to be entered into for risk management purposes only) and sets criteria for the creditworthiness of the transaction counterparties.

 

(b)         Credit risk

 

Excluding credit risk, if any, arising from currency swaps settled on a gross basis (see (d)), the best representation of our maximum exposure (excluding income tax effects) to credit risk, which is a worst-case scenario and does not reflect results we expect, is as set out in the following table:

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Cash and temporary investments, net

 

$

223

 

$

60

 

Accounts receivable

 

1,428

 

1,483

 

Derivative assets

 

40

 

31

 

 

 

$

1,691

 

$

1,574

 

 

GRAPHIC

 

22



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Cash and temporary investments

 

Credit risk associated with cash and temporary investments is managed by ensuring that these financial assets are placed with: governments; major financial institutions that have been accorded strong investment grade ratings by a primary rating agency; and/or other creditworthy counterparties. An ongoing review is performed to evaluate changes in the status of counterparties.

 

Accounts receivable

 

Credit risk associated with accounts receivable is inherently managed by our large and diverse customer base, which includes substantially all consumer and business sectors in Canada. We follow a program of credit evaluations of customers and limit the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary.

 

The following table presents an analysis of the age of customer accounts receivable for which an allowance has not been made as at the dates of the Consolidated statements of financial position. As at December 31, 2015, the weighted average age of customer accounts receivable was 28 days (2014 — 29 days) and the weighted average age of past-due customer accounts receivable was 62 days (2014 — 62 days). Any late payment charges are levied, at an industry-based market or negotiated rate, on outstanding non-current customer account balances.

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Customer accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less than 30 days past billing date

 

 

 

$

823

 

$

833

 

30-60 days past billing date

 

 

 

208

 

214

 

61-90 days past billing date

 

 

 

52

 

55

 

More than 90 days past billing date

 

 

 

64

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,147

 

$

1,170

 

Customer accounts receivable

 

25(a)

 

$

1,199

 

$

1,214

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

(52

)

(44

)

 

 

 

 

$

1,147

 

$

1,170

 

 

We maintain allowances for potential credit losses related to doubtful accounts. Current economic conditions, historical information, reasons for the accounts being past due and line of business from which the customer accounts receivable arose are all considered when determining whether to make allowances for past-due accounts. The same factors are considered when determining whether to write off amounts charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts against the customer accounts receivable. The doubtful accounts expense is calculated on a specific-identification basis for customer accounts receivable over a specific balance threshold and on a statistically derived allowance basis for the remainder. No customer accounts receivable are written off directly to the doubtful accounts expense.

 

The following table presents a summary of the activity related to our allowance for doubtful accounts.

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

44

 

$

40

 

Additions (doubtful accounts expense)

 

55

 

44

 

Net use

 

(47

)

(40

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

52

 

$

44

 

 

Derivative assets (and derivative liabilities)

 

Counterparties to our share-based compensation cash-settled equity forward agreements and foreign exchange derivatives are major financial institutions that have been accorded investment grade ratings by a primary rating agency. The dollar amount of credit exposure under contracts with any one financial institution is limited and counterparties’ credit ratings are monitored. We do not give or receive collateral on swap agreements and hedging items due to our credit rating and those of our counterparties. While we are exposed to potential credit losses due to the possible non-performance of our counterparties, we consider this risk remote. Our derivative liabilities do not have credit risk-related contingent features.

 

(c)          Liquidity risk

 

As a component of our capital structure financial policies, discussed further in Note 3, we manage liquidity risk by:

 

·                  maintaining a daily cash pooling process that enables us to manage our available liquidity and our liquidity requirements according to our actual needs;

·                  maintaining bilateral bank facilities (Note 19) and a syndicated credit facility (Note 21(d));

·                  maintaining an agreement to sell trade receivables to an arm’s-length securitization trust (Note 19);

·                  maintaining a commercial paper program (Note 21(c));

·                  maintaining an in-effect shelf prospectus;

·                  continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows; and

 

GRAPHIC

 

23



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

·                  managing maturity profiles of financial assets and financial liabilities.

 

Our debt maturities in future years are as disclosed in Note 21(f). As at December 31, 2015, we could offer $250 million (2014 — $3.0 billion) of debt or equity securities pursuant to a shelf prospectus that is in effect until December 2016. We believe that our investment grade credit ratings contribute to reasonable access to capital markets.

 

We closely match the contractual maturities of our derivative financial liabilities with those of the risk exposures they are being used to manage.

 

The expected maturities of our undiscounted financial liabilities do not differ significantly from the contractual maturities, other than as noted below. The contractual maturities of our undiscounted financial liabilities, including interest thereon (where applicable), are as set out in the following tables:

 

 

 

 

Non-derivative

 

Derivative

 

 

 

As at

 

Non-interest

 

 

 

Construction

 

Composite long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

bearing

 

 

 

credit facilities

 

Long-term

 

Currency swap agreement

 

 

 

Currency swap agreement

 

 

 

2015

 

financial

 

Short-term

 

commitment

 

debt 1

 

amounts to be exchanged 3

 

 

 

amounts to be exchanged

 

 

 

(millions)

 

liabilities

 

borrowings 1

 

(Note 18) 2

 

(Note 21)

 

(Receive)

 

Pay

 

Other

 

(Receive)

 

Pay

 

Total

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

1,239

 

$

 

$

131

 

$

378

 

$

(256

)

$

242

 

$

 

$

(109

)

$

100

 

$

1,725

 

Balance of year

 

656

 

101

 

 

975

 

 

 

4

 

(306

)

290

 

1,720

 

2017

 

28

 

 

 

1,174

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

1,211

 

2018

 

8

 

 

 

705

 

 

 

 

 

 

713

 

2019

 

6

 

 

 

1,453

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,459

 

2020

 

6

 

 

 

1,402

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,408

 

Thereafter

 

6

 

 

 

12,057

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,063

 

Total

 

$

1,949

 

$

101

 

$

131

 

$

18,144

 

$

(256

)

$

242

 

$

13

 

$

(415

)

$

390

 

$

20,299

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total(Note 21(f))

 

$

18,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)       Cash outflows in respect of interest payments on our short-term borrowings, commercial paper and amounts drawn under our credit facilities (if any) have been calculated based upon the interest rates in effect as at December 31, 2015.

(2)       The drawdowns on the construction credit facilities are expected to occur as construction progresses through 2018.

(3)       The amounts included in undiscounted non-derivative long-term debt in respect of U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt, and the corresponding amounts in the long-term debt currency swaps receive column, have been determined based upon the currency exchange rates in effect as at December 31, 2015. The U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt contractual amounts at maturity, in effect, are reflected in the long-term debt currency swaps pay column as gross cash flows are exchanged pursuant to the currency swap agreements.

 

 

 

Non-derivative

 

Derivative

 

 

 

 

 

Non-interest

 

 

 

Construction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

bearing

 

 

 

credit facilities

 

 

 

Currency swap agreement

 

 

 

 

 

financial

 

Short-term

 

commitment

 

Long-term debt 1

 

amounts to be exchanged

 

 

 

As at December 31, 2014 (millions)

 

liabilities

 

borrowings 1

 

(Note 18) 2

 

(Note 21)

 

(Receive)

 

Pay

 

Total

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

1,195

 

$

 

$

85

 

$

214

 

$

(49

)

$

47

 

$

1,492

 

Balance of year

 

604

 

1

 

 

471

 

(114

)

111

 

1,073

 

2016

 

6

 

102

 

 

1,011

 

 

 

1,119

 

2017

 

9

 

 

 

1,083

 

 

 

1,092

 

2018

 

4

 

 

 

365

 

 

 

369

 

2019

 

3

 

 

 

1,365

 

 

 

1,368

 

Thereafter

 

7

 

 

 

9,696

 

 

 

9,703

 

Total

 

$

1,828

 

$

103

 

$

85

 

$

14,205

 

$

(163

)

$

158

 

$

16,216

 

 


(1)         Cash outflows in respect of interest payments on our short-term borrowings, commercial paper and amounts drawn under our credit facilities (if any) have been calculated based upon the interest rates in effect as at December 31, 2014.

(2)         The drawdowns on the construction credit facilities were expected to occur as construction progresses through 2016.

 

(d)         Currency risk

 

Our functional currency is the Canadian dollar, but certain routine revenues and operating costs are denominated in U.S. dollars and some inventory purchases and capital asset acquisitions are sourced internationally. The U.S. dollar is the only foreign currency to which we have a significant exposure.

 

Our foreign exchange risk management includes the use of foreign currency forward contracts and currency options to fix the exchange rates on short-term U.S. dollar denominated transactions, commitments and commercial paper.

 

(e)          Interest rate risk

 

Changes in market interest rates will cause fluctuations in the fair value or future cash flows of temporary investments, construction credit facility advances made to the real estate joint ventures, short-term obligations, long-term debt and interest rate swap derivatives.

 

When we have temporary investments, they have short maturities and fixed interest rates and as a result, their fair value will fluctuate with changes in market interest rates; absent monetization prior to maturity, the related future cash flows will not change due to changes in market interest rates.

 

GRAPHIC

 

24



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

If the balance of short-term investments includes dividend-paying equity instruments, we could be exposed to interest rate risk.

 

Due to the short-term nature of the applicable rates of interest charged, the fair value of the construction credit facilities advances made to the real estate joint ventures is not materially affected by changes in market interest rates; associated cash flows representing interest payments will be affected until such advances are repaid.

 

As short-term obligations arising from bilateral bank facilities, which typically have variable interest rates, are rarely outstanding for periods that exceed one calendar week, interest rate risk associated with this item is not material.

 

Short-term borrowings arising from the sales of trade receivables to an arm’s-length securitization trust are fixed-rate debt. Due to the short maturities of these borrowings, interest rate risk associated with this item is not material.

 

All of our currently outstanding long-term debt, other than for commercial paper and amounts drawn on our credit facilities (Note 21(d)), is fixed-rate debt. The fair value of fixed-rate debt fluctuates with changes in market interest rates; absent early redemption, the related future cash flows will not change. Due to the short maturities of commercial paper, its fair value is not materially affected by changes in market interest rates, but the associated cash flows representing interest payments may be if the commercial paper is rolled over.

 

Amounts drawn on our short-term and long-term credit facilities will be affected by changes in market interest rates in a manner similar to commercial paper.

 

(f)           Other price risk

 

Provisions

 

We are exposed to other price risk arising from written put options provided for non-controlling interests.

 

Long-term investments

 

We are exposed to equity price risk arising from investments classified as available-for-sale. Such investments are held for strategic rather than trading purposes.

 

Share-based compensation derivatives

 

We are exposed to other price risk arising from cash-settled share-based compensation (appreciating Common Share prices increase both the expense and the potential cash outflow). Certain cash-settled equity swap agreements have been entered into that fix the cost associated with our restricted stock units (Note 13(c)).

 

(g)         Market risk

 

Net income and other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, could have varied if the Canadian dollar: U.S. dollar exchange rate and our Common Share price varied by reasonably possible amounts from their actual statement of financial position date amounts.

 

The sensitivity analysis of our exposure to currency risk at the reporting date has been determined based upon a hypothetical change taking place at the relevant statement of financial position date. The U.S. dollar denominated balances and derivative financial instrument notional amounts as at the statement of financial position dates have been used in the calculations.

 

The sensitivity analysis of our exposure to other price risk arising from share-based compensation at the reporting date has been determined based upon a hypothetical change taking place at the relevant statement of financial position date. The relevant notional number of Common Shares at the statement of financial position date, which includes those in the cash-settled equity swap agreements, has been used in the calculations.

 

Income tax expense, which is reflected net in the sensitivity analysis, reflects the applicable statutory income tax rates for the reporting periods.

 

Years ended December 31

 

Net income

 

Other comprehensive income

 

Comprehensive income

 

(increase (decrease) in millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

Reasonably possible changes in market risks 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10% change in Cdn.$: U.S.$ exchange rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canadian dollar appreciates

 

$

(25

)

$

(12

)

$

(8

)

$

 

$

(33

)

$

(12

)

Canadian dollar depreciates

 

$

25

 

$

11

 

$

8

 

$

 

$

33

 

$

11

 

25% 2 change in Common Share price 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Price increases

 

$

(9

)

$

(10

)

$

12

 

$

14

 

$

3

 

$

4

 

Price decreases

 

$

5

 

$

8

 

$

(12

)

$

(14

)

$

(7

)

$

(6

)

 


(1)         These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in net income and/or other comprehensive income generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in net income and/or other comprehensive income may not be linear. In this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the amount of net income and/or other comprehensive income is calculated without changing any other factors; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

 

 

25



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

The sensitivity analysis assumes that we would realize the changes in exchange rates; in reality, the competitive marketplace in which we operate would have an effect on this assumption.

No consideration has been made for a difference in the notional number of Common Shares associated with share-based compensation awards made during the reporting period that may have arisen due to a difference in the Common Share price.

(2)         To facilitate ongoing comparison of sensitivities, a constant variance of approximate magnitude has been used. Reflecting a twelve-month data period and calculated on a monthly basis, the volatility of our Common Share price as at December 31, 2015, was 14.1% (2014 — 14.4%).

(3)         The hypothetical effects of changes in the price of our Common Shares are restricted to those which would arise from our share-based compensation awards that are accounted for as liability instruments and the associated cash-settled equity swap agreements.

 

(h)         Fair values

 

General

 

The carrying values of cash and temporary investments, accounts receivable, short-term obligations, short-term borrowings, accounts payable and certain provisions (including restructuring accounts payable) approximate their fair values due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair values are determined directly by reference to quoted market prices in active markets.

 

The carrying values of our investments accounted for using the cost method do not exceed their fair values. The fair values of our investments accounted for as available-for-sale are based on quoted market prices in active markets or other clear and objective evidence of fair value.

 

The fair value of our long-term debt is based on quoted market prices in active markets.

 

The fair values of the derivative financial instruments we use to manage our exposure to currency risks are estimated based upon quoted market prices in active markets for the same or similar financial instruments or on the current rates offered to us for financial instruments of the same maturity, as well as discounted future cash flows determined using current rates for similar financial instruments subject to similar risks and maturities (such fair value estimates being largely based on the Canadian dollar: U.S. dollar forward exchange rate as at the statement of financial position dates).

 

The fair values of the derivative financial instruments we use to manage our exposure to increases in compensation costs arising from certain forms of share-based compensation are based upon fair value estimates of the related cash-settled equity forward agreements provided by the counterparty to the transactions (such fair value estimates being largely based on our Common Share price as at the statement of financial position dates).

 

The financial instruments that we measure at fair value on a recurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition and the level within the fair value hierarchy at which they are measured are as set out in the following table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value measurements at reporting date using

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted prices in active
markets for identical items

 

Significant other
observable inputs

 

Significant unobservable
inputs

 

 

 

Carrying value

 

(Level 1)

 

(Level 2)

 

(Level 3)

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange derivatives

 

$

40

 

$

4

 

$

 

$

 

$

40

 

$

4

 

$

 

$

 

Share-based compensation derivatives

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

Available-for-sale portfolio investments

 

30

 

26

 

2

 

5

 

28

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

$

70

 

$

57

 

$

2

 

$

5

 

$

68

 

$

52

 

$

 

$

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share-based compensation derivatives

 

$

11

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

11

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

26



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Derivative

 

The derivative financial instruments that we measure at fair value on a recurring basis subsequent to initial recognition are as set out in the following table.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Designation

 

Maximum
maturity
date

 

Notional
amount

 

Fair value
and carrying
value

 

Notional
amount

 

Fair value
and carrying
value

 

Current Assets 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives used to manage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar denominated purchases

 

HFT 2

 

2016

 

$

115

 

$

15

 

$

109

 

$

4

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar denominated purchases

 

HFH 3

 

2016

 

$

161

 

11

 

$

 

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar revenues

 

HFT 2

 

2016

 

$

62

 

 

$

30

 

 

Changes in share-based compensation costs (Note 13(c))

 

HFH 3

 

2015

 

$

 

 

$

91

 

23

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar denominated commercial paper (Note 21(c))

 

HFH 3

 

2016

 

$

243

 

14

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

40

 

 

 

$

27

 

Other Long-Term Assets 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives used to manage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in share-based compensation costs (Note 13(c))

 

HFH 3

 

2016

 

$

 

$

 

$

64

 

$

4

 

Current Liabilities 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives used to manage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar denominated purchases

 

HFT 2

 

2016

 

$

31

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar denominated purchases

 

HFH 3

 

2016

 

$

11

 

 

$

 

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar revenues

 

HFT 2

 

2016

 

$

8

 

 

$

19

 

 

Changes in share-based compensation costs (Note 13(c))

 

HFH 3

 

2016

 

$

71

 

2

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2

 

 

 

$

 

Other Long-Term Liabilities 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives used to manage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in share-based compensation costs (Note 13(c))

 

HFH 3

 

2017

 

$

68

 

$

9

 

$

 

$

 

 


(1)         Derivative financial assets and liabilities are not set off.

(2)         Designated as held for trading (HFT) upon initial recognition; hedge accounting is not applied.

(3)         Designated as held for hedging (HFH) upon initial recognition (cash flow hedging item); hedge accounting is applied.

 

Non-derivative

 

Our long-term debt, which is measured at amortized cost, and the fair value thereof, are as set out in the following table.

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Carrying
value

 

Fair value

 

Carrying
value

 

Fair value

 

Long-term debt (Note 21)

 

$

12,038

 

$

12,575

 

$

9,310

 

$

10,143

 

 

(i)            Recognition of derivative gains and losses

 

The following table sets out the gains and losses, excluding income tax effects, on derivative instruments that are classified as cash flow hedging items and their location within the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income. There was no ineffective portion of derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedging items for the periods presented.

 

 

 

Amount of gain (loss)
recognized in other
comprehensive income

 

Gain reclassified from other comprehensive
income to income (effective portion) (Note 10)

 

 

 

(effective portion) (Note 10)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Location

 

2015

 

2014

 

Derivatives used to manage:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar denominated purchases

 

$

12

 

$

 

Goods and services purchased

 

$

2

 

$

2

 

Changes in share-based compensation costs (Note 13(c))

 

(15

)

20

 

Employee benefits expense

 

 

17

 

Currency risks arising from U.S. dollar denominated commercial paper (Note 21(c))

 

14

 

 

Financing costs

 

14

 

 

 

 

$

11

 

$

20

 

 

 

$

16

 

$

19

 

 

 

27



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

The following table sets out the gains and losses arising from derivative instruments that are classified as held for trading and that are not designated as being in a hedging relationship, and their location within the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income.

 

 

 

 

 

Gain recognized in
income on derivatives

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Location

 

2015

 

2014

 

Derivatives used to manage currency risks

 

Financing costs

 

$

10

 

$

4

 

 

5                                         segmented information

 

General

 

The operating segments that are regularly reported to our Chief Executive Officer (our chief operating decision-maker) are wireless and wireline. Operating segments are components of an entity that engage in business activities from which they earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses related to transactions with the other component(s)), the operating results of which are regularly reviewed by a chief operating decision-maker to make resource allocation decisions and to assess performance. As referred to in Note 1(b), segmentation represents a significant judgment for us.

 

As we do not currently aggregate operating segments, our reportable segments are also wireless and wireline. The wireless segment includes network revenues (data and voice) and equipment sales. The wireline segment includes data revenues (which includes Internet protocol; television; hosting, managed information technology and cloud-based services; business process outsourcing; and certain healthcare solutions), voice revenues, and other telecommunications services revenues, excluding wireless. Segmentation is based on similarities in technology, the technical expertise required to deliver the services and products, customer characteristics, the distribution channels used and regulatory treatment. Intersegment sales are recorded at the exchange value, which is the amount agreed to by the parties.

 

The following segmented information is regularly reported to our chief operating decision-maker.

 

Years ended December 31

 

Wireless

 

Wireline

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

(millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

Operating revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

External revenue

 

$

6,933

 

$

6,587

 

$

5,569

 

$

5,415

 

$

 

$

 

$

12,502

 

$

12,002

 

Intersegment revenue

 

61

 

54

 

174

 

175

 

(235

)

(229

)

 

 

 

 

$

6,994

 

$

6,641

 

$

5,743

 

$

5,590

 

$

(235

)

$

(229

)

$

12,502

 

$

12,002

 

EBITDA 1

 

$

2,806

 

$

2,727

 

$

1,456

 

$

1,489

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,262

 

$

4,216

 

CAPEX, excluding spectrum licences 2

 

$

893

 

$

832

 

$

1,684

 

$

1,527

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,577

 

$

2,359

 

 

Operating revenues (above)

 

$

12,502

 

$

12,002

 

 

Goods and services purchased

 

5,532

 

5,299

 

 

Employee benefits expense

 

2,708

 

2,487

 

 

EBITDA (above)

 

4,262

 

4,216

 

 

Depreciation

 

1,475

 

1,423

 

 

Amortization

 

434

 

411

 

 

Operating income

 

2,353

 

2,382

 

 

Financing costs

 

447

 

456

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

1,906

 

$

1,926

 

 


(1)         Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) does not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS-IASB and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers; we define EBITDA as operating revenues less goods and services purchased and employee benefits expense. We have issued guidance on, and report, EBITDA because it is a key measure that management uses to evaluate the performance of our business, and it is also utilized in measuring compliance with certain debt covenants.

(2)         Total capital expenditures (CAPEX); see Note 25(b) for a reconciliation of capital expenditures, excluding spectrum licences to cash payments for capital assets, excluding spectrum licences reported in the Consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

Geographical information

 

We attribute revenues from external customers to individual countries on the basis of the location where the goods and/or services are provided. We do not have material revenues that we attribute to countries other than Canada (our country of domicile), nor do we have material amounts of property, plant, equipment, intangible assets and/or goodwill located outside of Canada; information about such non-material amounts is not regularly reported to our chief operating decision-maker.

 

 

28



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

6                 other operating income

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Government assistance, including deferral account amortization

 

 

 

$

48

 

$

55

 

Investment (loss)

 

 

 

(5

)

(2

)

Interest income

 

18(c)

 

3

 

3

 

Gain on disposal of assets and other

 

 

 

26

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

$

72

 

$

75

 

 

We receive government assistance, as defined by IFRS-IASB, from a number of sources and include such amounts received in Other operating income.

 

CRTC subsidy

 

Local exchange carriers’ costs of providing the level of residential basic telephone services that the CRTC requires to be provided in high cost serving areas are greater than the amounts the CRTC allows the local exchange carriers to charge for the level of service. To ameliorate the situation, the CRTC directs the collection of contribution payments, in a central fund, from all registered Canadian telecommunications service providers (including voice, data and wireless service providers) that are then disbursed to incumbent local exchange carriers as subsidy payments to partially offset the costs of providing residential basic telephone services in non-forborne high cost serving areas. The subsidy payments are based upon a total subsidy requirement calculated on a per network access line/per band subsidy rate. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our subsidy receipts were $22 million (2014 — $23 million).

 

The CRTC currently determines, at a national level, the total annual contribution requirement necessary to pay the subsidies and then collects contribution payments from the Canadian telecommunications service providers, calculated as a percentage of their CRTC-defined telecommunications service revenue. The final contribution expense rate for 2015 was 0.55% and the interim rate for 2016 has been set at 0.56%. For the year ended December 31, 2015, our contributions to the central fund, which are accounted for as goods and services purchased, were $26 million (2014 — $28 million).

 

Government of Quebec

 

Salaries for qualifying employment positions in the province of Quebec, mainly in the information technology sector, are eligible for tax credits. In respect of such tax credits, for the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded $8 million (2014 — $7 million).

 

7                 employee benefits expense

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Employee benefits expense — gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wages and salaries

 

 

 

$

2,537

 

$

2,424

 

Share-based compensation 1

 

13

 

125

 

120

 

Pensions — defined benefit

 

14(b)

 

118

 

86

 

Pensions — defined contribution

 

14(f)

 

90

 

84

 

Other defined benefits

 

14(g)

 

 

1

 

Restructuring costs 1

 

15(b)

 

156

 

54

 

Other

 

 

 

149

 

151

 

 

 

 

 

3,175

 

2,920

 

Capitalized internal labour costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

 

(319

)

(293

)

Intangible assets subject to amortization

 

 

 

(148

)

(140

)

 

 

 

 

(467

)

(433

)

 

 

 

 

$

2,708

 

$

2,487

 

 


(1)         For the year ended December 31, 2015, $7 of share-based compensation was included in restructuring costs (2014 — $NIL).

 

GRAPHIC

 

29



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

8                 financing costs

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on long-term debt — gross

 

 

 

$

498

 

$

433

 

Capitalized long-term debt interest 1

 

 

 

(45

)

 

Interest on long-term debt — net

 

 

 

453

 

433

 

Interest on short-term borrowings and other

 

 

 

5

 

5

 

Interest accretion on provisions

 

20

 

12

 

8

 

Long-term debt prepayment premium 2

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

470

 

459

 

Employee defined benefit plans net interest

 

14(b),(g)

 

27

 

3

 

Foreign exchange

 

 

 

(25

)

(4

)

 

 

 

 

472

 

458

 

Interest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on income tax refunds

 

 

 

(23

)

 

Other

 

 

 

(2

)

(2

)

 

 

 

 

(25

)

(2

)

 

 

 

 

$

447

 

$

456

 

 


(1)         Long-term debt interest at a composite rate of 3.31% was capitalized to intangible assets with indefinite lives.

(2)         On August 7, 2014, we exercised our right to early redeem, on September 8, 2014, all of our 5.95% Notes, Series CE.

 

9                 income taxes

 

(a)         Expense composition and rate reconciliation

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Current income tax expense (recovery)

 

 

 

 

 

For current reporting period

 

$

553

 

$

340

 

Adjustments recognized in the current period for income tax of prior periods

 

(97

)

(27

)

 

 

456

 

313

 

Deferred income tax expense (recovery)

 

 

 

 

 

Arising from the origination and reversal of temporary differences

 

(47

)

167

 

Revaluation of deferred income tax liability to reflect future statutory income tax rates

 

48

 

 

Adjustments recognized in the current period for income tax of prior periods

 

67

 

21

 

 

 

68

 

188

 

 

 

$

524

 

$

501

 

 

Our income tax expense and effective income tax rate differs from that calculated by applying the applicable statutory rates for the following reasons:

 

Years ended December 31 ($ in millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Income taxes computed at applicable statutory rates

 

$

505

 

26.5

%

$

504

 

26.2

%

Revaluation of deferred income tax liability to reflect future income tax rates

 

48

 

2.5

 

 

 

Adjustments recognized in the current period for income tax of prior periods

 

(30

)

(1.6

)

(6

)

(0.4

)

Other

 

1

 

0.1

 

3

 

0.2

 

Income tax expense per Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income

 

$

524

 

27.5

%

$

501

 

26.0

%

 

Our applicable statutory rate is the aggregate of the following:

 

Years ended December 31

 

2015

 

2014

 

Basic federal rate

 

14.4

%

14.7

%

Weighted average provincial rate

 

10.8

 

10.9

 

Non-Canadian jurisdictions

 

1.3

 

0.6

 

 

 

26.5

%

26.2

%

 

(b)         Temporary differences

 

We must make significant estimates in respect of the composition of our deferred income tax liability. Our operations are complex and the related income tax interpretations, regulations and legislation are continually changing. As a result, there are usually some income tax matters in question.

 

Temporary differences comprising the net deferred income tax liability and the amounts of deferred income tax expense recognized in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income are estimated as follows:

 

GRAPHIC

 

30



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(millions)

 

Property, plant
and equipment
and intangible
assets subject
to amortization

 

Intangible
assets with
indefinite lives

 

Partnership
income
unallocated for
income tax
purposes

 

Net pension
and share-
based
compensation
amounts

 

Reserves not
currently
deductible

 

Losses
available to
be carried
forward 
1

 

Other

 

Net deferred
income tax
liability

 

As at January 1, 2014

 

$

540

 

$

1,235

 

$

398

 

$

(18

)

$

(90

)

$

(154

)

$

(20

)

$

1,891

 

Recognized in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

61

 

38

 

(39

)

(19

)

(23

)

147

 

23

 

188

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

(157

)

 

 

 

(157

)

Business acquisitions and other

 

 

16

 

 

 

(22

)

2

 

18

 

14

 

As at December 31, 2014

 

601

 

1,289

 

359

 

(194

)

(135

)

(5

)

21

 

1,936

 

Recognized in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

184

 

91

 

(164

)

(5

)

(25

)

2

 

(15

)

68

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

(3

)

151

 

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

785

 

$

1,380

 

$

195

 

$

(45

)

$

(160

)

$

(3

)

$

3

 

$

2,155

 

 


(1)   We expect to be able to utilize our non-capital losses prior to expiry.

 

IFRS-IASB requires the separate disclosure of temporary differences arising from the carrying value of the investments in subsidiaries and partnerships exceeding their tax base, for which no deferred income tax liabilities have been recognized. In our specific instance, this is relevant to our investments in Canadian subsidiaries and Canadian partnerships. We are not required to recognize such deferred income tax liabilities as we are in a position to control the timing and manner of the reversal of the temporary differences, which would not be expected to be exigible to income tax, and it is probable that such differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Although we are in a position to control the timing and manner of the reversal of temporary differences in respect of our non-Canadian subsidiaries, and it is not probable that such differences will reverse in the foreseeable future, we recognize potential taxes for repatriation of certain unremitted earnings of our non-Canadian subsidiaries.

 

(c)          Other

 

We have net capital losses and such losses may only be applied against realized taxable capital gains. We expect to include a net capital loss carry-forward of $4 million (2014 — $3 million) in our Canadian income tax returns. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized the benefit of $3 million (2014 — $1 million) of net capital losses.

 

We conduct research and development activities, which are eligible to earn Investment Tax Credits. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded Investment Tax Credits of $6 million (2014 — $9 million). Of this amount, $4 million (2014 — $6 million) was recorded as a reduction of property, plant and equipment and/or intangible assets and the balance was recorded as a reduction of Goods and services purchased.

 

10          other comprehensive income

 

 

 

Items that may subsequently be reclassified to income

 

Item never
reclassified
to income

 

 

 

 

 

Change in unrealized fair value of
derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges in current period (Note 
4(i))

 

Cumulative

 

Change in
unrealized fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(millions)

 

Gains (losses)
arising

 

Prior period
(gains) losses
transferred to
net income

 

Total

 

foreign
currency
translation
adjustment

 

value of
available-for-
sale financial
assets

 

Accumulated
other
comp. income

 

Employee
defined benefit
plan
re-measurements
1

 

Other
comp. income

 

Accumulated balance as at January 1, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

$

3

 

$

8

 

$

20

 

$

31

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount arising

 

$

20

 

$

(19

)

1

 

10

 

(4

)

7

 

$

(602

)

$

(595

)

Income taxes

 

$

5

 

$

(5

)

 

 

 

 

(157

)

(157

)

Net

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

10

 

(4

)

7

 

$

(445

)

$

(438

)

Accumulated balance as at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

18

 

16

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount arising

 

$

11

 

$

(16

)

(5

)

25

 

 

20

 

$

597

 

$

617

 

Income taxes

 

$

3

 

$

(4

)

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

152

 

151

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

(4

)

25

 

 

21

 

$

445

 

$

466

 

Accumulated balance as at December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

$

43

 

$

16

 

$

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRAPHIC

 

31



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 


(1)              The amounts presented as employee defined benefit plan re-measurements are comprised as follows:

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Years ended December 31

 

Defined
benefit
pension plans
(Note 14(b))

 

Other defined
benefit plans
(Note14(g))

 

Total

 

Defined
benefit
pension plans
(Note 14(b))

 

Other defined
benefit plans
(Note14(g))

 

Total

 

Actual return on plan assets greater (less) than discount rate

 

$

139

 

$

 

$

139

 

$

429

 

$

 

$

429

 

Re-measurements arising from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demographic assumptions

 

69

 

1

 

70

 

(67

)

2

 

(65

)

Financial assumptions

 

418

 

 

418

 

(984

)

(2

)

(986

)

Changes in the effect of limiting the net defined benefit assets to the asset ceiling

 

(30

)

 

(30

)

20

 

 

20

 

 

 

$

596

 

$

1

 

$

597

 

$

(602

)

$

 

$

(602

)

 

As at December 31, 2015, our estimate of the net amount of existing gains (losses) arising from the unrealized fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges that are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income and are expected to be reclassified to net income in the next twelve months, excluding income tax effects, is $(1) million.

 

11        per share amounts

 

Basic net income per Common Share is calculated by dividing net income by the total weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per Common Share is calculated to give effect to share option awards and restricted stock units.

 

The following table presents the reconciliations of the denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations. Net income was equal to diluted net income for all periods presented.

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Basic total weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding

 

603

 

616

 

Effect of dilutive securities

 

 

 

 

 

Share option awards

 

1

 

2

 

Diluted total weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding

 

604

 

618

 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, no outstanding share option awards were excluded in the computation of diluted net income per Common Share.

 

12        dividends per share

 

(a)         Dividends declared

 

Years ended December 31 (millions
except per share amounts)

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

Declared

 

Paid to
shareholders

 

 

 

Declared

 

Paid to
shareholders

 

 

 

Common Share dividends

 

Effective

 

Per share

 

 

Total

 

Effective

 

Per share

 

 

Total

 

Quarter 1 dividend

 

Mar. 11, 2015

 

$

0.40

 

Apr. 1, 2015

 

$

243

 

Mar. 11, 2014

 

$

0.36

 

Apr. 1, 2014

 

$

224

 

Quarter 2 dividend

 

Jun. 10, 2015

 

0.42

 

Jul. 2, 2015

 

253

 

Jun. 10, 2014

 

0.38

 

Jul. 2, 2014

 

234

 

Quarter 3 dividend

 

Sep. 8, 2015

 

0.42

 

Oct. 1, 2015

 

252

 

Sep. 10, 2014

 

0.38

 

Oct. 1, 2014

 

233

 

Quarter 4 dividend

 

Dec. 11, 2015

 

0.44

 

Jan. 4, 2016

 

263

 

Dec. 11, 2014

 

0.40

 

Jan. 2, 2015

 

244

 

 

 

 

 

$

1.68

 

 

 

$

1,011

 

 

 

$

1.52

 

 

 

$

935

 

 

On February 10, 2016, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share on our issued and outstanding Common Shares payable on April 1, 2016, to holders of record at the close of business on March 11, 2016. The final amount of the dividend payment depends upon the number of Common Shares issued and outstanding at the close of business on March 11, 2016.

 

(b)         Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan

 

General

 

We have a Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan under which eligible holders of Common Shares may acquire additional Common Shares by reinvesting dividends and by making additional optional cash payments to the trustee. Under this Plan, we have the option of offering Common Shares from Treasury or having the trustee acquire Common Shares in the stock market.

 

GRAPHIC

 

32



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Reinvestment of dividends

 

We may, at our discretion, offer Common Shares at a discount of up to 5% from the market price under the Plan. We opted to have the trustee acquire the Common Shares in the stock market with no discount offered. In respect of Common Share dividends declared during the year ended December 31, 2015, $59 million (2014 — $46 million) was to be reinvested in Common Shares.

 

Optional cash payments

 

Under the share purchase feature of the Plan, eligible shareholders can, on a monthly basis, make optional cash payments and purchase our Common Shares at the market price without brokerage commissions or service charges; such purchases are subject to a minimum investment of $100 per transaction and a maximum investment of $20,000 per calendar year.

 

13        share-based compensation

 

(a)         Details of share-based compensation expense

 

Reflected in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as Employee benefits expense and in the Consolidated statements of cash flows are the following share-based compensation amounts:

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Employee
benefits
expense

 

Associated
operating
cash
outflows

 

Statement
of cash
flows
adjustment

 

Employee
benefits
expense

 

Associated
operating
cash
outflows

 

Statement
of cash
flows
adjustment

 

Share option awards

 

$

1

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

3

 

$

 

$

3

 

Restricted stock units 1

 

93

 

(132

)

(39

)

81

 

(10

)

71

 

Employee share purchase plan

 

38

 

(38

)

 

36

 

(36

)

 

 

 

$

132

 

$

(170

)

$

(38

)

$

120

 

$

(46

)

$

74

 

 


(1)         The expense arising from restricted stock units was net of cash-settled equity swap agreement effects (see Note 4(i)). Within employee benefits expense (see Note 7), restricted stock unit expense of $86 (2014 — $81) is presented as share-based compensation and the balance is included in restructuring costs.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the associated operating cash outflows in respect of restricted stock units are net of cash inflows arising from the cash-settled equity swap agreements of $27 million (2014 — $7 million). For the year ended December 31, 2015, the income tax benefit arising from share-based compensation was $35 million (2014 — $31 million).

 

(b)         Share option awards

 

We use share option awards as a form of retention and incentive compensation. Employees may receive options to purchase Common Shares at a price equal to the fair market value at the time of grant. Share option awards granted under the plan may be exercised over specific periods not to exceed seven years from the time of grant. No share options were awarded in fiscal 2015 or 2014.

 

We apply the fair value method of accounting for share-based compensation awards granted to officers and other employees. Share option awards typically have a three-year vesting period (the requisite service period), but may vest over periods of up to five years. The vesting method of share option awards, which is determined on or before the date of grant, may be either cliff or graded; all share option awards granted subsequent to 2004 have been cliff-vesting awards.

 

The weighted average fair value of share option awards granted is calculated by using the Black-Scholes model (a closed-form option pricing model). The risk-free interest rate used in determining the fair value of the share option awards is based on a Government of Canada yield curve that is current at the time of grant. The expected lives of the share option awards are based on our historical share option award exercise data. Similarly, expected volatility considers the historical volatility in the price of our Common Shares. The dividend yield is the annualized dividend current at the time of grant divided by the share option award exercise price. Dividends are not paid on unexercised share option awards and are not subject to vesting.

 

Our share option awards have a net-equity settlement feature. The optionee does not have the choice of exercising the net-equity settlement feature; it is at our option whether the exercise of a share option award is settled as a share option or settled using the net-equity settlement feature.

 

GRAPHIC

 

33



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

The following table presents a summary of the activity related to our share option plan.

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Years ended December 31

 

Number of
share
options

 

Weighted
average
share option
price

 

Number of
share
options

 

Weighted
average
share option
price

 

Outstanding, beginning of period

 

4,667,422

 

$

23.53

 

8,101,853

 

$

23.03

 

Exercised 1

 

(2,064,100

)

$

24.23

 

(3,252,373

)

$

22.07

 

Forfeited

 

(72,350

)

$

26.13

 

(108,366

)

$

26.80

 

Expired

 

(155,376

)

$

21.90

 

(73,692

)

$

28.24

 

Outstanding, end of period

 

2,375,596

 

$

22.96

 

4,667,422

 

$

23.53

 

 


(1)         The total intrinsic value of share option awards exercised for the year ended December 31, 2015, was $38 million (2014 — $57 million) (reflecting a weighted average price at the dates of exercise of $42.64 per share (2014 — $39.52 per share)). The difference between the number of share options exercised and the number of Common Shares issued (as reflected in the Consolidated statements of changes in owners’ equity) is the effect of our choosing to settle share option award exercises using the net-equity settlement feature.

 

The following is a life and exercise price stratification of our outstanding share options, all of which are vested, as at December 31, 2015.

 

Options outstanding and exercisable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Weighted
average
price

 

Range of option prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Low

 

$

14.91

 

$

21.42

 

$

28.56

 

$

14.91

 

 

 

High

 

$

18.92

 

$

25.64

 

$

31.69

 

$

31.69

 

 

 

Year of expiry and number of options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

245,293

 

 

 

245,293

 

$

15.30

 

2017

 

579,811

 

35,020

 

 

614,831

 

$

16.66

 

2018

 

 

627,482

 

 

627,482

 

$

23.29

 

2019

 

 

 

887,990

 

887,990

 

$

29.21

 

 

 

825,104

 

662,502

 

887,990

 

2,375,596

 

 

 

Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)

 

0.9

 

2.1

 

3.4

 

2.2

 

 

 

Weighted average price

 

$

16.05

 

$

23.20

 

$

29.21

 

$

22.96

 

 

 

Aggregate intrinsic value 1 (millions)

 

$

18

 

$

10

 

$

8

 

$

36

 

 

 

 


(1)         The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated based on the December 31, 2015, price of $38.26 per Common Share.

 

(c)          Restricted stock units

 

We use restricted stock units as a form of retention and incentive compensation. Each restricted stock unit is nominally equal in value to one Common Share and is nominally entitled to the dividends that would arise thereon if it were an issued and outstanding Common Share. The notional dividends are recorded as additional issuances of restricted stock units during the life of the restricted stock unit. Due to the notional dividend mechanism, the grant-date fair value of restricted stock units equals the fair market value of the corresponding Common Shares at the grant date. The restricted stock units generally become payable when vesting is completed and typically vest over a period of 33 months (the requisite service period). The vesting method of restricted stock units, which is determined on or before the date of grant, may be either cliff or graded; the majority of restricted stock units outstanding have cliff vesting. The associated liability is normally cash-settled.

 

We also award restricted stock units that largely have the same features as our general restricted stock units, but have a variable payout (0% — 200%) depending upon the achievement of our total customer connections performance condition (with a weighting of 25%) and the total shareholder return on our Common Shares relative to an international peer group of telecommunications companies (with a weighting of 75%). The grant-date fair value of the notional subset of our restricted stock units affected by the total customer connections performance condition equals the fair market value of the corresponding Common Shares at the grant date and thus the notional subset has been included in the presentation of our restricted stock units with only service conditions. The recurring estimate, which reflects a variable payout, of the fair value of the notional subset of our restricted stock units affected by the relative total shareholder return performance element is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation.

 

GRAPHIC

 

34



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

The following table presents a summary of our outstanding non-vested restricted stock units.

 

Number of non-vested restricted stock units as at December 31

 

2015

 

2014

 

Restricted stock units without market performance conditions

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted stock units with only service conditions

 

3,468,679

 

5,455,368

 

Notional subset affected by total customer connections performance condition

 

135,404

 

69,072

 

 

 

3,604,083

 

5,524,440

 

Restricted stock units with market performance conditions

 

 

 

 

 

Notional subset affected by relative total shareholder return performance condition

 

406,243

 

207,215

 

 

 

4,010,326

 

5,731,655

 

 

The following table presents a summary of the activity related to our restricted stock units without market performance conditions.

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

Number of restricted
stock units
 1

 

Weighted
average
grant-date

 

Number of restricted
stock units
 1

 

Weighted
average
grant-date

 

Years ended December 31

 

Non-vested

 

Vested

 

fair value

 

Non-vested

 

Vested

 

fair value

 

Outstanding, beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-vested

 

5,524,440

 

 

$

35.04

 

3,833,297

 

 

$

32.73

 

Vested

 

 

38,717

 

$

34.20

 

 

18,759

 

$

32.47

 

Issued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial award

 

1,844,161

 

 

$

44.00

 

2,051,739

 

 

$

38.90

 

In lieu of dividends

 

211,545

 

363

 

$

41.98

 

214,316

 

391

 

$

39.96

 

Vested

 

(3,810,514

)

3,810,514

 

$

33.44

 

(451,363

)

451,363

 

$

33.05

 

Settled in cash

 

 

(3,820,476

)

$

33.34

 

 

(431,796

)

$

33.11

 

Forfeited and cancelled

 

(165,549

)

 

$

38.19

 

(123,549

)

 

$

34.59

 

Outstanding, end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-vested

 

3,604,083

 

 

$

41.42

 

5,524,440

 

 

$

35.04

 

Vested

 

 

29,118

 

$

40.00

 

 

38,717

 

$

34.20

 

 


(1)         Excluding the notional subset of restricted stock units affected by the relative total shareholder return performance element.

 

With respect to certain issuances of restricted stock units, we have entered into cash-settled equity forward agreements that fix our cost; that information, as well as a schedule of our non-vested restricted stock units outstanding as at December 31, 2015, is set out in the following table.

 

Vesting in years ending December 31

 

Number of
fixed-cost
restricted
stock units

 

Our fixed cost
per restricted
stock unit

 

Number of
variable-cost
restricted stock
units

 

Total number of
non-vested
restricted stock
units
 1

 

2016

 

1,727,000

 

$

41.07

 

217,904

 

1,944,904

 

2017

 

1,539,107

 

$

45.58

 

120,072

 

1,659,179

 

 

 

3,266,107

 

 

 

337,976

 

3,604,083

 

 


(1)   Excluding the notional subset of restricted stock units affected by the relative total shareholder return performance element.

 

(d)         Employee share purchase plan

 

We have an employee share purchase plan under which eligible employees up to a certain job classification can purchase our Common Shares through regular payroll deductions by contributing between 1% and 10% of their pay (subsequent to December 31, 2015, the range was increased to between 1% and 20% of their pay); for more highly compensated job classifications, employees may contribute between 1% and 55% of their pay. For every dollar contributed by an employee, up to a maximum of 6% of eligible employee pay, we are required to make a contribution at a percentage between 20% and 40%. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we contributed 40% for employees up to a certain job classification; for more highly compensated job classifications, we contributed 35%. We record our contributions as a component of Employee benefits expense and our contribution vests on the earlier of a plan participant’s last day in our employ or the last business day of the calendar year of our contribution, unless the plan participant’s employment is terminated with cause, in which case the plan participant will forfeit any in-year contribution from us.

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Employee contributions

 

$

105

 

$

98

 

Employer contributions

 

38

 

36

 

 

 

$

143

 

$

134

 

 

 

35



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

14           employee future benefits

 

We have a number of defined benefit and defined contribution plans providing pension and other retirement and post-employment benefits to most of our employees. As at December 31, 2015 and 2014, all registered defined benefit pension plans were closed to substantially all new participants and substantially all benefits had vested. The benefit plans in which our employees are participants reflect developments in our corporate history.

 

TELUS Corporation Pension Plan

 

Management and professional employees in Alberta who joined us prior to January 1, 2001, and certain unionized employees who joined us prior to June 9, 2011, are covered by this contributory defined benefit pension plan, which comprises slightly more than one-half of our total accrued benefit obligation. The plan contains a supplemental benefit account that may provide indexation up to 70% of the annual increase in a specified cost-of-living index. Pensionable remuneration is determined by the average of the best five years in the last ten years preceding retirement.

 

Pension Plan for Management and Professional Employees of TELUS Corporation

 

This defined benefit pension plan, which with certain limited exceptions ceased accepting new participants on January 1, 2006, and which comprises approximately one-quarter of our total accrued benefit obligation, provides a non-contributory base level of pension benefits. Additionally, on a contributory basis, employees annually can choose increased and/or enhanced levels of pension benefits above the base level. At an enhanced level of pension benefits, the plan has indexation of 100% of the annual increase in a specified cost-of-living index, to an annual maximum of 2%. Pensionable remuneration is determined by the annualized average of the best 60 consecutive months.

 

TELUS Québec Defined Benefit Pension Plan

 

This contributory defined benefit pension plan, which ceased accepting new participants on April 14, 2009, covers any employee not governed by a collective agreement in Quebec who joined us prior to April 1, 2006, any non-supervisory employee governed by a collective agreement who joined us prior to September 6, 2006, and certain other unionized employees. The plan comprises approximately one-tenth of our total accrued benefit obligation. The plan has no indexation and pensionable remuneration is determined by the average of the best four years.

 

TELUS Edmonton Pension Plan

 

This contributory defined benefit pension plan ceased accepting new participants on January 1, 1998. Indexation is 60% of the annual increase in a specified cost-of-living index and pensionable remuneration is determined by the annualized average of the best 60 consecutive months. The plan comprises less than one-tenth of our total accrued benefit obligation.

 

Other defined benefit pension plans

 

In addition to the foregoing plans, we have non-registered, non-contributory supplementary defined benefit pension plans, which have the effect of maintaining the earned pension benefit once the allowable maximums in the registered plans are attained. As is common with non-registered plans of this nature, these plans are typically funded only as benefits are paid. These plans comprise less than 5% of our total accrued benefit obligation.

 

We have three contributory, non-indexed defined benefit pension plans arising from a pre-merger acquisition, which comprise less than 1% of our total accrued benefit obligation; these plans ceased accepting new participants in September 1989.

 

Telecommunication Workers Pension Plan

 

Certain employees in British Columbia are covered by a negotiated-cost, target-benefit union pension plan. Our contributions are determined in accordance with provisions of negotiated labour contracts, the current one of which expired December 31, 2015, and are generally based on employee gross earnings. We are not required to guarantee the benefits or assure the solvency of the plan, and we are not liable to the plan for other participating employers’ obligations. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, our contributions comprised a significant proportion of the employer contributions to the union pension plan; similarly, a significant proportion of the plan participants were our active and retired employee participants.

 

British Columbia Public Service Pension Plan

 

Certain employees in British Columbia are covered by a public service pension plan. Contributions are determined in accordance with provisions of labour contracts negotiated by the Province of British Columbia and are generally based on employee gross earnings.

 

 

36



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Defined contribution pension plans

 

We offer three defined contribution pension plans, which are contributory, and these are the pension plans that we sponsor that are available to our non-unionized and certain of our unionized employees. Employees, annually, can generally choose to contribute to the plans at a rate of between 3% and 6% of their pensionable earnings. Generally, we match 100% of the contributions of employees up to 5% of their pensionable earnings and 80% of employee contributions greater than that. Membership in a defined contribution pension plan is generally voluntary until an employee’s third-year service anniversary. In the event that annual contributions exceed allowable maximums, excess amounts are in certain cases contributed to a non-registered supplementary defined contribution pension plan.

 

Other defined benefit plans

 

Other defined benefit plans, which are all non-contributory and, as at December 31, 2015 and 2014, non-funded, are comprised of a healthcare plan for retired employees and a life insurance plan, both of which ceased accepting new participants on January 1, 1997.

 

(a)         Defined benefit pension plans — funded status overview

 

Information concerning our defined benefit pension plans, in aggregate, is as follows:

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

ACCRUED BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS:

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

9,036

 

$

7,910

 

Current service cost

 

126

 

106

 

Past service cost

 

11

 

1

 

Interest expense

 

349

 

371

 

Actuarial loss (gain) arising from:

 

 

 

 

 

Demographic assumptions

 

(69

)

67

 

Financial assumptions

 

(418

)

984

 

Benefits paid

 

(415

)

(403

)

Balance at end of year

 

8,620

 

9,036

 

PLAN ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value at beginning of year

 

8,480

 

7,974

 

Return on plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

Notional interest income on plan assets at discount rate

 

325

 

372

 

Actual return on plan assets greater than discount rate

 

139

 

429

 

Contributions

 

 

 

 

 

Employer contributions (d)

 

93

 

87

 

Employees’ contributions

 

25

 

27

 

Benefits paid

 

(415

)

(403

)

Administrative fees

 

(6

)

(6

)

Fair value at end of year

 

8,641

 

8,480

 

Effect of asset ceiling limit

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

(42

)

(59

)

Change

 

(32

)

17

 

End of year

 

(74

)

(42

)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year, net of asset ceiling limit

 

8,567

 

8,438

 

FUNDED STATUS — PLAN SURPLUS (DEFICIT)

 

$

(53

)

$

(598

)

 

The plan surplus (deficit) is reflected in the Consolidated statements of financial position as follows:

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Funded status — plan surplus (deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension benefit plans

 

 

 

$

(53

)

$

(598

)

Other benefit plans

 

 

 

(42

)

(43

)

 

 

 

 

$

(95

)

$

(641

)

Presented in the Consolidated statements of financial position as:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term assets

 

25(a)

 

$

356 

 

$

49 

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

25(a)

 

(451

)

(690

)

 

 

 

 

$

(95

)

$

(641

)

 

The measurement date used to determine the plan assets and accrued benefit obligations was December 31.

 

 

37



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(b)         Defined benefit pension plans — details

 

Expense

 

Our defined benefit pension plan expense (recovery) was as follows:

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)
Recognized in

 

Employee
benefits
expense
(Note 7)

 

Financing
costs
(Note 8)

 

Other
comp.
income 
(Note 10)

 

Total

 

Employee
benefits
expense
(Note 7)

 

Financing
costs
(Note 8)

 

Other
comp.
income
(Note 10)

 

Total

 

Current service cost

 

$

101

 

$

 

$

 

$

101

 

$

79

 

$

 

$

 

$

79

 

Past service costs

 

11

 

 

 

11

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Net interest; return on plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense arising from accrued benefit obligations

 

 

349

 

 

349

 

 

371

 

 

371

 

Return, including interest income, on plan assets 1

 

 

(325

)

(139

)

(464

)

 

(372

)

(429

)

(801

)

Interest effect on asset ceiling limit

 

 

2

 

 

2

 

 

3

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

26

 

(139

)

(113

)

 

2

 

(429

)

(427

)

Administrative fees

 

 

 

 

6

 

6

 

 

 

6

 

Re-measurements arising from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demographic assumptions

 

 

 

(69

)

(69

)

 

 

67

 

67

 

Financial assumptions

 

 

 

(418

)

(418

)

 

 

984

 

984

 

 

 

 

 

(487

)

(487

)

 

 

1,051

 

1,051

 

Changes in the effect of limiting net defined benefit assets to the asset ceiling

 

 

 

30

 

30

 

 

 

(20

)

(20

)

 

 

$

118

 

$

26

 

$

(596

)

$

(452

)

$

86

 

$

2

 

$

602

 

$

690

 

 


(1)         The interest income on the plan assets portion of the employee defined benefit plans net interest amount included in Financing costs reflects a rate of return on plan assets equal to the discount rate used in determining the accrued benefit obligations.

 

Future benefit payments

 

Estimated future benefit payments from our defined benefit pension plans, calculated as at December 31, 2015, are as follows:

 

Years ending December 31 (millions)

 

 

 

2016

 

$

428

 

2017

 

439

 

2018

 

448

 

2019

 

455

 

2020

 

459

 

2021-2025

 

2,380

 

 

Disaggregation of defined benefit pension plan funding status

 

Accrued benefit obligations are the actuarial present values of benefits attributed to employee services rendered to a particular date. Our disaggregation of defined benefit pension plan surpluses and deficits at year-end is as follows:

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Accrued
benefit
obligations

 

Plan
assets

 

Difference

 

PBSR
solvency
position 
1

 

Accrued
benefit
obligations

 

Plan
assets

 

Difference

 

PBSR
solvency
position 
1

 

Pension plans that have plan assets in excess of accrued benefit obligations

 

$

7,429

 

$

7,785

 

$

356

 

$

459

 

$

624

 

$

673

 

$

49 

 

$

134 

 

Pension plans that have accrued benefit obligations in excess of plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded

 

1,001

 

782

 

(219

)

(30

)

8,109

 

7,765

 

(344

)

(203

)

Unfunded

 

190

 

 

(190

)

N/A

2

303

 

 

(303

)

N/A

2

 

 

1,191

 

782

 

(409

)

(30

)

8,412

 

7,765

 

(647

)

(203

)

 

 

$

8,620

 

$

8,567

 

$

(53

)

$

429

 

$

9,036

 

$

8,438

 

$

(598

)

$

(69

)

Accrued benefit obligations owed to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Active members

 

$

2,271

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,562

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred members

 

513

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

579

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pensioners

 

5,836

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,895

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

8,620

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

9,036

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 


(1)         The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, by way of the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985 (PBSR) (see (d)), requires that a solvency valuation be performed on a periodic basis. The actual PBSR solvency positions are determined in conjunction with mid-year annual funding reports prepared by actuaries (see (d)); as a result, the PBSR solvency positions in this table as at December 31, 2015 and 2014, are interim estimates and updated estimates, respectively. The interim estimate as at December 31, 2014, was a net deficit of $426.

 

Interim estimated solvency ratios as at December 31, 2015, ranged from 96% to 110% (2014 – updated estimate is 91% to 103%; interim estimate was 89% to 98%) and the estimated three-year average solvency ratios, adjusted as required by the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985, ranged from 97% to 108% (2014 – updated estimate is 91% to 102%; interim estimate was 91% to 101%).

 

The solvency valuation effectively uses the fair value (excluding any asset ceiling limit effects) of the funded defined benefit pension plan assets (adjusted for theoretical wind-up expenses) to measure the solvency assets. Although the accrued benefit obligations and the solvency liabilities are calculated similarly, the assumptions used for each differ, primarily in respect of retirement ages and discount rates, and the solvency liabilities, due to the required assumption about each plan being terminated on the valuation date, do not reflect assumptions about future compensation levels. Relative to the experience-based estimates of retirement ages used for purposes of determining the accrued benefit obligations, the minimum no-consent retirement age used for solvency valuation purposes may result in either a greater or lesser pension liability, depending upon the provisions of each plan. The solvency positions in this table reflect composite weighted average discount rates of 3.00% (2014 – 2.40%). A hypothetical decrease of 25 basis points in the composite weighted average discount rate would result in a $107 decrease in the PBSR solvency position as at December 31, 2015 (2014 – $300); these sensitivities are hypothetical, should be used with caution, are calculated without changing any other assumption and generally cannot be extrapolated because changes in amounts may not be linear.

 

(2)         PBSR solvency position calculations are not required for the three pension plans arising from a pre-merger acquisition or for the non-registered, unfunded pension plans.

 

Fair value measurements

 

Information about the fair value measurements of our defined benefit pension plan assets, in aggregate, is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value measurements at reporting date using

 

 

 

Total

 

Quoted prices in active
markets for identical items

 

Other

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

Asset class

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canadian

 

$

1,841

 

$

2,205

 

$

1,387

 

$

1,758

 

$

454

 

$

447

 

Foreign

 

2,232

 

2,355

 

1,527

 

1,720

 

705

 

635

 

Debt securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued by national, provincial or local governments

 

1,558

 

1,704

 

1,252

 

1,245

 

306

 

459

 

Corporate debt securities

 

1,353

 

904

 

 

 

1,353

 

904

 

Asset-backed securities

 

32

 

33

 

 

 

32

 

33

 

Commercial mortgages

 

691

 

497

 

 

 

691

 

497

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

308

 

246

 

12

 

3

 

296

 

243

 

Real estate

 

626

 

536

 

14

 

17

 

612

 

519

 

 

 

8,641

 

8,480

 

$

4,192

 

$

4,743

 

$

4,449

 

$

3,737

 

Effect of asset ceiling limit

 

(74

)

(42

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

8,567

 

$

8,438

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As at December 31, 2015, we administered pension benefit trusts that held Common Shares and debt of TELUS Corporation with fair values of approximately $NIL (2014 – $NIL) and $3 million (2014 – $8 million), respectively. As at December 31, 2015 and 2014, pension benefit trusts that we administered did not lease real estate to us.

 

(c)          Plan investment strategies and policies

 

Our primary goal for the defined benefit pension plans is to ensure the security of the retirement income and other benefits of the plan members and their beneficiaries. A secondary goal is to maximize the long-term rate of return on the defined benefit plans’ assets within a level of risk acceptable to us.

 

Risk management

 

We consider absolute risk (the risk of contribution increases, inadequate plan surplus and unfunded obligations) to be more important than relative return risk. Accordingly, the defined benefit plans’ designs, the nature and maturity of defined benefit obligations and the characteristics of the plans’ memberships significantly influence investment strategies and policies. We manage risk by specifying allowable and prohibited investment types, setting diversification strategies and determining target asset allocations.

 

Allowable and prohibited investment types

 

Allowable and prohibited investment types, along with associated guidelines and limits, are set out in each plan’s required Statement of Investment Policies and Procedures (SIPP), which is reviewed and approved annually by the designated governing body. The SIPP guidelines and limits are further governed by the permitted investments and lending limits set out in the Pension Benefits Standards Regulations, 1985. As well as conventional investments, each fund’s SIPP may provide for the use of derivative products to facilitate investment operations and to manage risk, provided that no short position is taken, no use of leverage is made and there is no violation of guidelines and limits established in the SIPP. Internally managed funds are prohibited from increasing grandfathered investments in our

 

 

39



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

securities; grandfathered investments were made prior to the merger of BC TELECOM Inc. and TELUS Corporation, our predecessors. Externally managed funds are permitted to invest in our securities, provided that the investments are consistent with the funds’ mandate and are in compliance with the relevant SIPP.

 

Diversification

 

Our strategy for investments in equity securities is to be broadly diversified across individual securities, industry sectors and geographical regions. A meaningful portion (20% – 30% of total plan assets) of the plans’ investment in equity securities is allocated to foreign equity securities with the intent of further increasing the diversification of plan assets. Debt securities may include a meaningful allocation to mortgages with the objective of enhancing cash flow and providing greater scope for the management of the bond component of the plan assets. Debt securities also may include real return bonds to provide inflation protection, consistent with the indexed nature of some defined benefit obligations. Real estate investments are used to provide diversification of plan assets, hedging of potential long-term inflation and comparatively stable investment income.

 

Relationship between plan assets and benefit obligations

 

With the objective of lowering the long-term costs of our defined benefit pension plans, we purposely mismatch plan assets and benefit obligations. This mismatching is effected by including equity investments in the long-term asset mix, as well as fixed income securities and mortgages with durations that differ from those of the benefit obligations.

 

As at December 31, 2015, the present value-weighted average timing of estimated cash flows for the obligations (duration) of the defined benefit pension plans was 14.0 years (2014 – 14.2 years) and of the other defined benefit plans was 7.3 years (2014 – 8.3 years). Compensation for liquidity issues that may have otherwise arisen from the mismatching of plan assets and benefit obligations is provided by broadly diversified investment holdings (including cash and short-term investments) and cash flows from dividends, interest and rents from those diversified investment holdings.

 

Asset allocations

 

Our defined benefit pension plans’ target asset allocations and actual asset allocations are as follows:

 

 

 

Target
allocation

 

Percentage of plan assets
at end of year

 

Years ended December 31

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

Equity securities

 

20-50%

 

47

%

54

%

Debt securities

 

40-75%

 

46

%

40

%

Real estate

 

5-25%

 

7

%

6

%

Other

 

0-4%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

%

100

%

 

(d)         Employer contributions

 

The determination of the minimum funding amounts necessary for substantially all of our registered defined benefit pension plans is governed by the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985, which requires that, in addition to current service costs being funded, both going-concern and solvency valuations be performed on a specified periodic basis.

 

·                  Any excess of plan assets over plan liabilities determined in the going-concern valuation reduces our minimum funding requirement for current service costs, but may not reduce the requirement to an amount less than the employees’ contributions. The going-concern valuation generally determines the excess (if any) of a plan’s assets over its liabilities, determined on a projected benefit basis.

·                  As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the solvency valuation generally requires that a plan’s average solvency liabilities, determined on the basis that the plan is terminated on the valuation date, in excess of its assets (if any) be funded, at a minimum, in equal annual amounts over a period not exceeding five years. So as to manage the risk of overfunding the plans, which results from the solvency valuation for funding purposes utilizing the average solvency ratios, our funding may include the provision of letters of credit. As at December 31, 2015, undrawn letters of credit in the amount of $161 million (2014 – $133 million) secured certain obligations of the defined benefit pension plans.

 

Our best estimate of fiscal 2016 employer contributions to our defined benefit plans is approximately $57 million for defined benefit pension plans. This estimate is based upon the mid-year 2015 annual funding reports that were prepared by actuaries using December 31, 2014, actuarial valuations. The funding reports are based on the pension plans’ fiscal years, which are calendar years. The next annual funding valuations are expected to be prepared mid-year 2016.

 

 

40



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(e)          Assumptions

 

As referred to in Note 1(b), management is required to make significant estimates about certain actuarial and economic assumptions that are used in determining defined benefit pension costs, accrued benefit obligations and pension plan assets. These significant estimates are of a long-term nature, which is consistent with the nature of employee future benefits.

 

Demographic assumptions

 

In determining the defined benefit pension expense recognized in net income for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we utilized the Canadian Institute of Actuaries CPM 2014 mortality tables.

 

Financial assumptions

 

The discount rate, which is used to determine a plan’s accrued benefit obligations, is based upon the yield on long-term, high-quality fixed-term investments, and is set annually. The rate of future increases in compensation is based upon current benefits policies and economic forecasts.

 

The significant weighted average actuarial assumptions arising from these estimates and adopted in measuring our accrued benefit obligations are as follows:

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Discount rate used to determine:

 

 

 

 

 

Net benefit costs for the year ended December 31

 

3.90

%

4.75

%

Accrued benefit obligations as at December 31

 

4.00

%

3.90

%

Rate of future increases in compensation used to determine:

 

 

 

 

 

Net benefit costs for the year ended December 31

 

3.00

%

3.00

%

Accrued benefit obligations as at December 31

 

3.00

%

3.00

%

 

Sensitivity of key assumptions

 

The sensitivity of our key assumptions for our defined benefit pension plans was as follows:

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Years ended, or as at, December 31
Increase (decrease) (in millions)

 

Change in
obligations

 

Change in
expense

 

Change in
obligations

 

Change in
expense

 

Sensitivity of key demographic assumptions to an increase of one year 1 in life expectancy

 

$

214

 

$

11

 

$

230

 

$

11

 

Sensitivity of key financial assumptions to a hypothetical decrease of 25 basis points 1 in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

$

302

 

$

17

 

$

328

 

$

18

 

Rate of future increases in compensation

 

$

(26

)

$

(3

)

$

(28

)

$

(3

)

 


(1)         These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Favourable hypothetical changes in the assumptions result in decreased amounts, and unfavourable hypothetical changes in the assumptions result in increased amounts, of the obligations and expenses. Changes in amounts based on a variation in assumptions of one year or 25 basis points generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in amounts may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the change in obligation or change in expense is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in discount rates may result in changes in expectations about the rate of future increases in compensation), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

 

(f)           Defined contribution plans — expense

 

Our total defined contribution pension plan costs recognized were as follows:

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Union pension plan and public service pension plan contributions

 

$

28

 

$

27

 

Other defined contribution pension plans

 

62

 

57

 

 

 

$

90

 

$

84

 

 

We expect that our 2016 union pension plan and public service pension plan contributions will be approximately $91 million.

 

(g)         Other defined benefit plans

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015, other defined benefit current service cost was $NIL (2014 – $1 million), financing cost was $1 million (2014 – $1 million) and other re-measurements recorded in other comprehensive income were $(1) million (2014 – $NIL). Estimated future benefit payments from our other defined benefit plans, calculated as at December 31, 2015, are $2 million annually for 2016-2020 and $8 million for the five-year period 2021-2025.

 

15   restructuring and other costs

 

(a)         Details of restructuring and other costs

 

With the objective of reducing ongoing costs, we incur associated incremental, non-recurring restructuring costs, as discussed further in (b) following. We may also incur atypical charges when undertaking major or transformational changes to our business or operating models. We also include incremental external costs incurred in connection with business acquisition or disposition activity, as well as litigation costs, in the context of significant losses or settlements, in other costs.

 

 

41



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Restructuring and other costs are presented in the Consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income as set out in the following table:

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Goods and services purchased

 

$

70

 

$

21

 

Employee benefits expense

 

156

 

54

 

 

 

$

226

 

$

75

 

 

(b)         Restructuring provisions

 

Employee related provisions and other provisions, as presented in Note 20, include amounts in respect of restructuring activities. In 2015, restructuring activities included ongoing and incremental efficiency initiatives including personnel-related costs largely from the reduction of 1,500 full-time positions announced in November 2015 and rationalization of real estate. These initiatives were intended to improve our long-term operating productivity and competitiveness.

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Employee
related
 1

 

Other 1

 

Total 1

 

Employee
related
 1

 

Other 1

 

Total 1

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions

 

$

160

 

$

74

 

$

234

 

$

54

 

$

22

 

$

76

 

Reversal

 

(4

)

(4

)

(8

)

 

(1

)

(1

)

Expense

 

156

 

70

 

226

 

54

 

21

 

75

 

Use

 

(81

)

(41

)

(122

)

(48

)

(26

)

(74

)

Expenses greater (less) than disbursements

 

75

 

29

 

104

 

6

 

(5

)

1

 

Restructuring provisions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

41

 

28

 

69

 

35

 

33

 

68

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

116

 

$

57

 

$

173

 

$

41

 

$

28

 

$

69

 

 


(1)         The transactions and balances in this column, excluding share-based compensation amounts, are included in, and thus are a subset of, the transactions and balances in the column with the same caption in Note 20.

 

16   property, plant and equipment

 

(millions)

 

Network
assets

 

Buildings and
leasehold
improvements

 

Other

 

Land

 

Assets under
construction

 

Total

 

At cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As at January 1, 2014

 

$

25,119

 

$

2,713

 

$

1,146

 

$

55

 

$

432

 

$

29,465

 

Additions 1

 

750

 

23

 

43

 

 

1,274

 

2,090

 

Additions arising from business acquisitions (Note 17(d))

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Dispositions, retirements and other

 

(463

)

(52

)

(103

)

 

 

(618

)

Assets under construction put into service

 

1,009

 

117

 

76

 

 

(1,202

)

 

As at December 31, 2014

 

26,415

 

2,801

 

1,163

 

55

 

504

 

30,938

 

Additions 1

 

732

 

24

 

93

 

 

1,252

 

2,101

 

Dispositions, retirements and other

 

(1,098

)

(106

)

(209

)

 

 

(1,413

)

Assets under construction put into service

 

1,142

 

128

 

73

 

 

(1,343

)

 

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

27,191

 

$

2,847

 

$

1,120

 

$

55

 

$

413

 

$

31,626

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As at January 1, 2014

 

$

18,478

 

$

1,734

 

$

825

 

$

 

$

 

$

21,037

 

Depreciation

 

1,192

 

126

 

105

 

 

 

1,423

 

Dispositions, retirements and other

 

(468

)

(52

)

(125

)

 

 

(645

)

As at December 31, 2014

 

19,202

 

1,808

 

805

 

 

 

21,815

 

Depreciation

 

1,268

 

95

 

112

 

 

 

1,475

 

Dispositions, retirements and other

 

(1,119

)

(93

)

(188

)

 

 

(1,400

)

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

19,351

 

$

1,810

 

$

729

 

$

 

$

 

$

21,890

 

Net book value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As at December 31, 2014

 

$

7,213

 

$

993

 

$

358

 

$

55

 

$

504

 

$

9,123

 

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

7,840

 

$

1,037

 

$

391

 

$

55

 

$

413

 

$

9,736

 

 


(1)         For the year ended December 31, 2015, additions include $65 (2014 – $172) in respect of asset retirement obligations (see Note 20).

 

The gross carrying value of fully depreciated property, plant and equipment that was still in use as at December 31, 2015, was $3.0 billion (2014 – $2.9 billion). As at December 31, 2015, our contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment were $326 million over a period ending December 31, 2017 (2014 – $321 million over a period ending December 31, 2015).

 

 

42



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

17          intangible assets and goodwill

 

(a)         Intangible assets and goodwill, net

 

 

 

Intangible assets subject to amortization

 

Intangible
assets with
indefinite
lives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(millions)

 

Subscriber
base

 

Customer contracts,
related customer
relationships and
leasehold interests

 

Software

 

Access to
rights-of-way
and other

 

Assets under
construction

 

Total

 

Spectrum
licences

 

Total
intangible
assets

 

Goodwill 1

 

Total intangible
assets and
goodwill

 

At cost

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As at January 1, 2014

 

$

245

 

$

217

 

$

3,207

 

$

84

 

$

189

 

$

3,942

 

$

5,168

 

$

9,110

 

$

4,101

 

$

13,211

 

Additions

 

 

 

11

 

3

 

427

 

441

 

1,171

 

1,612

 

 

1,612

 

Additions arising from business acquisitions (d)

 

 

12

 

4

 

 

 

16

 

51

 

67

 

20

 

87

 

Dispositions, retirements and other (including capitalized interest)

 

 

(1

)

(207

)

(7

)

 

(215

)

 

(215

)

 

(215

)

Assets under construction put into service

 

 

 

391

 

3

 

(394

)

 

 

 

 

 

As at December 31, 2014

 

245

 

228

 

3,406

 

83

 

222

 

4,184

 

6,390

 

10,574

 

4,121

 

14,695

 

Additions

 

 

 

19

 

4

 

508

 

531

 

2,048

 

2,579

 

 

2,579

 

Additions arising from business acquisitions (d)

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

2

 

4

 

6

 

Dispositions, retirements and other (including capitalized interest)

 

 

 

(140

)

3

 

 

(137

)

42

 

(95

)

 

(95

)

Assets under construction put into service

 

 

 

514

 

 

(514

)

 

 

 

 

 

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

245

 

$

228

 

$

3,801

 

$

90

 

$

216

 

$

4,580

 

$

8,480

 

$

13,060

 

$

4,125

 

$

17,185

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As at January 1, 2014

 

$

84

 

$

111

 

$

2,335

 

$

49

 

$

 

$

2,579

 

$

 

$

2,579

 

$

364

 

$

2,943

 

Amortization

 

14

 

28

 

363

 

6

 

 

411

 

 

411

 

 

411

 

Dispositions, retirements and other

 

 

 

(208

)

(5

)

 

(213

)

 

(213

)

 

(213

)

As at December 31, 2014

 

98

 

139

 

2,490

 

50

 

 

2,777

 

 

2,777

 

364

 

3,141

 

Amortization

 

14

 

29

 

387

 

4

 

 

434

 

 

434

 

 

434

 

Dispositions, retirements and other

 

 

 

(138

)

2

 

 

(136

)

 

(136

)

 

(136

)

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

112

 

$

168

 

$

2,739

 

$

56

 

$

 

$

3,075

 

$

 

$

3,075

 

$

364

 

$

3,439

 

Net book value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As at December 31, 2014

 

$

147

 

$

89

 

$

916

 

$

33

 

$

222

 

$

1,407

 

$

6,390

 

$

7,797

 

$

3,757

 

$

11,554

 

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

133

 

$

60

 

$

1,062

 

$

34

 

$

216

 

$

1,505

 

$

8,480

 

$

9,985

 

$

3,761

 

$

13,746

 

 


(1)   Accumulated amortization of goodwill is amortization recorded prior to 2002; there are no accumulated impairment losses in the accumulated amortization of goodwill.

 

The gross carrying value of fully amortized intangible assets subject to amortization that were still in use as at December 31, 2015, was $736 million (2014 — $706 million). As at December 31, 2015, our contractual commitments for the acquisition of intangible assets were $55 million over a period ending December 31, 2018 (2014 — $89 million over a period ending December 31, 2018).

 

The Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development (formerly Industry Canada)’s AWS-3 spectrum auction occurred during the

 

GRAPHIC

 

43



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

three-month period ended March 31, 2015; we were the successful auction participant on 15 spectrum licences with a purchase price of $1.5 billion. The Department’s 2500 MHz spectrum auction occurred during the three-month period ended June 30, 2015; we were the successful auction participant on 122 spectrum licences with a purchase price of $479 million. Previously, the Department’s 700 MHz spectrum auction occurred during the three-month period ended March 31, 2014; we were the successful auction participant on 30 spectrum licences with a purchase price of $1.14 billion.

 

(b)         Intangible assets with indefinite lives — spectrum licences

 

Our intangible assets with indefinite lives include spectrum licences granted by the Canadian Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. The spectrum licence policy terms indicate that the spectrum licences will likely be renewed. We expect our spectrum licences to be renewed every 20 years following a review of our compliance with licence terms. In addition to current usage, our licensed spectrum can be used for planned and new technologies. As a result of our assessment of the combination of these significant factors, we currently consider our spectrum licences to have indefinite lives and, as referred to in Note 1(b), this represents a significant judgment for us.

 

(c)          Impairment testing of intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill

 

General

 

As referred to in Note 1(j), the carrying values of intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill are periodically tested for impairment and, as referred to in Note 1(b), this test represents a significant estimate for us as well as requiring significant judgments to be made.

 

The carrying values of intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill allocated to each cash-generating unit are as set out in the following table.

 

 

 

Intangible assets with
indefinite lives

 

Goodwill

 

Total

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

Wireless

 

$

8,480

 

$

6,390

 

$

2,646

 

$

2,646

 

$

11,126

 

$

9,036

 

Wireline

 

 

 

1,115

 

1,111

 

1,115

 

1,111

 

 

 

$

8,480

 

$

6,390

 

$

3,761

 

$

3,757

 

$

12,241

 

$

10,147

 

 

The recoverable amounts of the cash-generating units’ assets have been determined based on a value in use calculation. There is a material degree of uncertainty with respect to the estimates of the recoverable amounts of the cash-generating units’ assets, given the necessity of making key economic assumptions about the future.

 

We validate our value in use calculation results through a market-comparable approach and an analytical review of industry facts and facts that are specific to us. The market-comparable approach uses current (at time of test) market consensus estimates and equity trading prices for U.S. and Canadian firms in the same industry. In addition, we ensure that the combination of the valuations of the cash-generating units is reasonable based on our current (at time of test) market values.

 

Key assumptions

 

The value in use calculation uses discounted cash flow projections that employ the following key assumptions: future cash flows and growth projections (including judgments about the allocation of future capital expenditures supporting both wireless and wireline operations); associated economic risk assumptions and estimates of achieving key operating metrics and drivers; estimates of generational infrastructure future capital expenditures; and the future weighted average cost of capital. We consider a range of reasonably possible amounts to use for key assumptions and decide upon amounts that represent management’s best estimates. In the normal course, we make changes to key assumptions to reflect current (at time of test) economic conditions, updates of historical information used to develop the key assumptions and changes (if any) in our debt ratings.

 

The cash flow projection key assumptions are based upon our approved financial forecasts, which span a period of three years and are discounted, for December 2015 annual test purposes, at a consolidated pre-tax notional rate of 9.11% (2014 — 9.07%). For impairment testing valuations, the cash flows subsequent to the three-year projection period are extrapolated, for December 2015 annual test purposes, using perpetual growth rates of 1.75% (2014 — 1.75%) for the wireless cash-generating unit and 0.50% (2014 — 0.50%) for the wireline cash-generating unit; these growth rates do not exceed the long-term average growth rates observed in the markets in which we operate.

 

We believe that any reasonably possible change in the key assumptions on which the calculation of the recoverable amounts of our cash-generating units is based would not cause the cash-generating units’ carrying values (including the intangible assets with indefinite lives and the goodwill allocated to each cash-generating unit) to exceed their recoverable amounts. If the future were to adversely differ from management’s best estimates of key assumptions and associated

 

GRAPHIC

 

44



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

cash flows were to be materially adversely affected, we could potentially experience future material impairment charges in respect of our intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill.

 

Sensitivity testing

 

Sensitivity testing was conducted as a part of the December 2015 annual test, a component of which was hypothetical changes in the future weighted average cost of capital. Stress testing included moderate declines in annual cash flows with all other assumptions being held constant; under this scenario, we would be able to recover the carrying values of our intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill for the foreseeable future.

 

(d)         Business acquisitions

 

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we acquired 100% ownership of multiple businesses complementary to our existing lines of business. The primary factor that gave rise to the recognition of goodwill was the earnings capacity of the acquired businesses in excess of the net tangible assets and net intangible assets acquired (such excess arising from: the low levels of tangible assets relative to the earnings capacity of the businesses; expected synergies; the benefits of acquiring established businesses with certain capabilities in the industry; and the geographic presence of the acquired businesses). A portion of the amounts assigned to goodwill may be deductible for income tax purposes. The acquisition-date fair values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the individually immaterial acquisitions are also individually immaterial. Any differences between the results of operations currently presented and the pro forma operating revenues, net income and basic and diluted net income per Common Share amounts reflecting the results of operations as if the business acquisitions had been completed at the beginning of the fiscal year are immaterial (as are the post-acquisition operating revenues and net income of the acquired businesses for the year ended December 31, 2015).

 

18           real estate joint ventures

 

(a)         General

 

In 2011, we partnered, as equals, with an arm’s-length party in a residential condominium, retail and commercial real estate redevelopment project, TELUS Garden, in Vancouver, British Columbia. TELUS is a tenant in TELUS Garden, which is now our new global headquarters. The new-build office tower was built to the 2009 Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Platinum standard and the neighbouring new-build residential condominium tower, scheduled for completion in the first half of 2016, is being built to the LEED Gold standard.

 

In 2013, we partnered, as equals, with two arm’s-length parties (one of which is also our TELUS Garden partner) in a residential, retail and commercial real estate redevelopment project, TELUS Sky, in Calgary, Alberta. The new-build tower, scheduled for completion in 2018, is to be built to the LEED Platinum standard.

 

GRAPHIC

 

45



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(b)         Real estate joint ventures — summarized financial information

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and temporary investments, net

 

$

20

 

$

11

 

Escrowed deposits for tenant inducements and liens

 

20

 

 

Sales contract deposits held by arm’s-length trustee

 

6

 

30

 

Other

 

21

 

7

 

Property under development — residential condominiums (subject to sales contracts)

 

179

 

 

 

 

246

 

48

 

Non-current assets

 

 

 

 

 

Property under development

 

 

 

 

 

Residential condominiums (subject to sales contracts)

 

 

106

 

Investment property

 

73

 

228

 

Investment property

 

238

 

 

 

 

311

 

334

 

 

 

$

557

 

$

382

 

LIABILITIES AND OWNERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

46

 

$

7

 

Sales contract deposits

 

 

 

 

 

Payable

 

55

 

 

Held by arm’s-length trustee

 

6

 

 

Current portion of senior secured 3.4% bonds due July 2025

 

4

 

 

Construction credit facilities

 

96

 

 

Construction holdback liabilities

 

10

 

 

Other financial liability 1

 

18

 

 

 

 

235

 

7

 

Non-current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Sales contract deposits

 

 

 

 

 

Payable

 

 

36

 

Held by arm’s-length trustee

 

 

30

 

Construction credit facilities

 

9

 

204

 

Construction holdback liabilities

 

 

10

 

Other

 

4

 

 

Senior secured 3.4% bonds due July 2025

 

217

 

 

Other financial liability 1

 

 

18

 

 

 

230

 

298

 

Liabilities

 

465

 

305

 

Owners’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

TELUS 2

 

36

 

32

 

Other partners

 

56

 

45

 

 

 

92

 

77

 

 

 

$

557

 

$

382

 

 


(1)         Other financial liability is due to us; such amount is non-interest bearing, is secured by an $18 mortgage on the TELUS Garden residential condominium tower, is payable in cash and is due subsequent to repayment of the residential condominium tower construction credit facility.

(2)         The equity amounts recorded by the real estate joint ventures differ from those recorded by us by the amount of the deferred gains on our real estate contributed.

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Revenue from investment property

 

$

17

 

$

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

7

 

$

 

Interest expense 1

 

$

7

 

$

 

Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(4

)

$

 

 


(1)         During the year ended December 31, 2015, the real estate joint ventures capitalized $5 (2014 — $5) of financing costs.

 

GRAPHIC

 

46



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(c)          Our transactions with the real estate joint ventures

 

Our investment-related transactions with the real estate joint ventures are as set out in the following table.

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Loans and
receivables
 1

 

Equity 2

 

Total

 

Loans and
receivables
 1

 

Equity 2

 

Total

 

Related to real estate joint ventures’ statements of income and other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to us

 

$

 

$

(2

)

$

(2

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

Related to real estate joint ventures’ statements of financial position

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Items not affecting currently reported cash flows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our real estate contributed

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

7

 

Deferral of gain on our remaining interest in real estate contributed

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

(2

)

Construction credit facilities financing costs charged by us and other (Note 6)

 

3

 

 

3

 

3

 

 

3

 

Cash flows in the current reporting period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction credit facilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts advanced

 

44

 

 

44

 

51

 

 

51

 

Amounts repaid

 

(95

)

 

(95

)

 

 

 

Financing costs paid to us

 

(3

)

 

(3

)

(3

)

 

(3

)

Funds we advanced or contributed, excluding construction credit facilities

 

 

6

 

6

 

 

6

 

6

 

Cash payment arising from joint venture capital account rebalancing

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

(1

)

Net increase (decrease)

 

(51

)

4

 

(47

)

51

 

10

 

61

 

Accounts with real estate joint ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

120

 

21

 

141

 

69

 

11

 

80

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

69

 

$

25

 

$

94

 

$

120

 

$

21

 

$

141

 

Accounts with real estate joint ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

66

 

$

 

$

66

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Non-current assets

 

3

 

25

 

28

 

120

 

21

 

141

 

 

 

$

69

 

$

25

 

$

94

 

$

120

 

$

21

 

$

141

 

 


(1)         Loans and receivables are included in our Consolidated statements of financial position as Real estate joint venture advances and are comprised of advances under construction credit facilities (see (d)) and an $18 mortgage on the TELUS Garden residential condominium tower.

(2)         We account for our interests in the real estate joint ventures using the equity method of accounting.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the TELUS Garden real estate joint venture recognized $6 million (2014 — $NIL) of revenue from our TELUS Garden office tenancy; of this amount, one-half is due to our economic interest in the real estate joint venture and one-half is due to our partner’s economic interest in the real estate joint venture.

 

(d)         Commitments and contingent liabilities

 

Construction commitments

 

The TELUS Garden real estate joint venture is expected to spend a total of approximately $470 million on the construction of an office tower and a residential condominium tower. As at December 31, 2015, the real estate joint venture’s construction-related contractual commitments were approximately $38 million through to 2016 (2014 — $100 million through to 2016).

 

The TELUS Sky real estate joint venture is expected to spend a total of approximately $400 million on the construction of a mixed-use tower. As at December 31, 2015, the real estate joint venture’s construction-related contractual commitments were approximately $124 million through to 2018 (2014 — $4 million through to 2018).

 

Operating leases

 

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we entered into a 20-year operating lease for office space in the TELUS Sky real estate joint venture. Future minimum lease payments in respect of our office space operating leases at TELUS Garden and TELUS Sky are set out in Note 23(a).

 

Construction credit facilities

 

The TELUS Garden real estate joint venture has a credit agreement with two Canadian financial institutions (as 50% lender) and TELUS Corporation (as 50% lender) to provide $136 million (2014 — $374 million) of construction financing for the residential project; subsequent to December 31, 2015, the credit agreement was extended to July 31, 2016. The

 

GRAPHIC

 

47



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

TELUS Sky real estate joint venture has a credit agreement with three Canadian financial institutions (as 66-2/3% lender) and TELUS Corporation (as 33-1/3% lender) to provide $342 million of construction financing for the project.

 

The construction credit facilities contain customary real estate construction financing representations, warranties and covenants and are secured by demand debentures constituting first fixed and floating charge mortgages over the underlying real estate assets. The construction credit facilities are available by way of bankers’ acceptance or prime loan and bear interest at rates in line with similar construction financing facilities.

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Construction credit facilities commitment — TELUS Corporation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undrawn

 

4(c)

 

$

131

 

$

85

 

Advances

 

 

 

51

 

102

 

 

 

 

 

182

 

187

 

Construction credit facilities commitment — other

 

 

 

296

 

187

 

 

 

 

 

$

478

 

$

374

 

 

Other — TELUS Garden

 

We are to receive 50% of the earnings from the sale of residential condominium tower units in excess of the first $18 million of earnings; we are to receive 25% of the first $18 million of earnings and the arm’s-length co-owner is to receive 75%.

 

We have guaranteed the payment of 50% of the TELUS Garden real estate joint venture’s construction credit facility carrying costs, cost overruns and costs to complete. We have also provided an environmental indemnity in favour of the construction lenders. If we pay out under such guarantee or indemnity because the arm’s-length co-owner has not paid its pro rata share of project costs, then we have recourse options available, including against the arm’s-length co-owner’s interest in the real estate joint venture. As at December 31, 2015, we had no liability recorded in respect of TELUS Garden real estate joint venture obligations and guarantees.

 

Other — TELUS Sky

 

We have guaranteed the payment of 33-1/3% of the TELUS Sky real estate joint venture’s construction credit facility carrying costs, cost overruns and costs to complete. We have also provided an environmental indemnity in favour of the construction lenders. If we pay out under such guarantee or indemnity because either of the arm’s-length co-owners have not paid their pro rata share of project costs, then we have recourse options available, including against such arm’s-length co-owner’s interest in the real estate joint venture. As at December 31, 2015, we had no liability recorded in respect of TELUS Sky real estate joint venture obligations and guarantees.

 

19           short-term borrowings

 

On July 26, 2002, one of our subsidiaries, TELUS Communications Inc. (see Note 1(a)), entered into an agreement with an arm’s-length securitization trust associated with a major Schedule I bank under which it is able to sell an interest in certain trade receivables up to a maximum of $500 million (2014 — $500 million). This revolving-period securitization agreement was renewed in 2014, its current term ends December 31, 2016, and it requires minimum cash proceeds of $100 million from monthly sales of interests in certain trade receivables. TELUS Communications Inc. is required to maintain at least a BB (2014 — BB) credit rating by Dominion Bond Rating Service or the securitization trust may require the sale program to be wound down prior to the end of the term.

 

When we sell our trade receivables, we retain reserve accounts, which are retained interests in the securitized trade receivables, and servicing rights. As at December 31, 2015, we had sold to the trust (but continued to recognize) trade receivables of $124 million (2014 — $113 million). Short-term borrowings of $100 million (2014 — $100 million) are comprised of amounts advanced to us by the arm’s-length securitization trust pursuant to the sale of trade receivables.

 

The balance of short-term borrowings (if any) comprised amounts drawn on our bilateral bank facilities.

 

GRAPHIC

 

48



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

20                                  provisions

 

(millions)

 

Asset
retirement
obligation

 

Employee
related

 

Other

 

Total

 

As at January 1, 2014

 

$

155

 

$

49

 

$

125

 

$

329

 

Additions

 

8

 

54

 

79

 

141

 

Use

 

(6

)

(62

)

(96

)

(164

)

Reversal

 

(8

)

 

(2

)

(10

)

Interest effect 1

 

171

 

 

1

 

172

 

As at December 31, 2014

 

320

 

41

 

107

 

468

 

Additions 2

 

5

 

153

 

85

 

243

 

Use

 

(9

)

(81

)

(45

)

(135

)

Reversal

 

(10

)

(4

)

(4

)

(18

)

Interest effect 1

 

71

 

 

1

 

72

 

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

377

 

$

109

 

$

144

 

$

630

 

Current

 

$

21

 

$

41

 

$

64

 

$

126

 

Non-current

 

299

 

 

43

 

342

 

As at December 31, 2014

 

$

320

 

$

41

 

$

107

 

$

468

 

Current

 

$

19

 

$

109

 

$

69

 

$

197

 

Non-current

 

358

 

 

75

 

433

 

As at December 31, 2015

 

$

377

 

$

109

 

$

144

 

$

630

 

 


(1)         The difference of $60 (2014 — $164) between the interest effect in this table and the amount disclosed in Note 8 is in respect of the change in the discount rates applicable to the provision, such difference being included in the cost of the associated asset(s) by way of being included with (netted against) the additions detailed in Note 16.

(2)         For the year ended December 31, 2015, employee related additions are net of share-based compensation of $7.

 

Asset retirement obligation

 

We establish provisions for liabilities associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or normal operation of the assets. We expect that the cash outflows in respect of the balance accrued as at the financial statement date will occur proximate to the dates these assets are retired.

 

Employee related

 

The employee related provisions are largely in respect of restructuring activities (as discussed further in Note 15). The timing of the cash outflows in respect of the balance accrued as at the financial statement date is substantially short-term in nature.

 

Other

 

The provision for other includes: legal claims; non-employee related restructuring activities (as discussed further in Note 15); and written put options, contract termination costs and onerous contracts related to business acquisitions. Other than as set out following, we expect that the cash outflows in respect of the balance accrued as at the financial statement date will occur over an indeterminate multi-year period.

 

As discussed further in Note 23, we are involved in a number of legal claims and we are aware of certain other possible legal claims. In respect of legal claims, we establish provisions, when warranted, after taking into account legal assessments, information presently available, and the expected availability of recourse. The timing of cash outflows associated with legal claims cannot be reasonably determined.

 

In connection with business acquisitions, we have established provisions for contingent consideration, written put options in respect of non-controlling interests, contract termination costs and onerous contracts acquired. No cash outflows for the written put options occurred prior to their initial exercisability in December 2015. In respect of contract termination costs and onerous contracts acquired, cash outflows are expected to occur through mid-2018.

 

 

49



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

21                                  long-term debt

 

(a)         Details of long-term debt

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

TELUS Corporation notes

 

(b)

 

$

11,164

 

$

8,437

 

TELUS Corporation commercial paper

 

(c)

 

256

 

130

 

TELUS Communications Inc. debentures

 

(e)

 

618

 

743

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

$

12,038

 

$

9,310

 

Current

 

 

 

$

856

 

$

255

 

Non-current

 

 

 

11,182

 

9,055

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

$

12,038

 

$

9,310

 

 

(b)         TELUS Corporation notes

 

The notes are our senior, unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured, unsubordinated obligations, are senior in right of payment to all of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness, and are effectively subordinated to all existing and future obligations of, or guaranteed by, our subsidiaries.

 

The indentures governing the notes contain certain covenants which, among other things, place limitations on our ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to: grant security in respect of indebtedness; enter into sale-leaseback transactions; and incur new indebtedness.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal face amount

 

Redemption present
value spread

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at

 

 

 

Series 1

 

Issued

 

Maturity

 

Issue
price

 

Originally
issued

 

financial
statement date

 

Basis
points

 

Cessation
date

 

4.95% Notes, Series CD

 

March 2007

 

March 2017

 

$

999.53

 

$

700 million

 

$

700 million

 

24 2

 

N/A

 

5.05% Notes, Series CG 3

 

December 2009

 

December 2019

 

$

994.19

 

$

1.0 billion

 

$

1.0 billion

 

45.5 2

 

N/A

 

5.05% Notes, Series CH 3

 

July 2010

 

July 2020

 

$

997.44

 

$

1.0 billion

 

$

1.0 billion

 

47 2

 

N/A

 

3.65% Notes, Series CI 3

 

May 2011

 

May 2016

 

$

996.29

 

$

600 million

 

$

600 million

 

29.5 2

 

N/A

 

3.35% Notes, Series CJ 3

 

December 2012

 

March 2023

 

$

998.83

 

$

500 million

 

$

500 million

 

40 4

 

Dec. 15, 2022

 

3.35% Notes, Series CK 3

 

April 2013

 

April 2024

 

$

994.35

 

$

1.1 billion

 

$

1.1 billion

 

36 4

 

Jan. 2, 2024

 

4.40% Notes, Series CL 3

 

April 2013

 

April 2043

 

$

997.68

 

$

600 million

 

$

600 million

 

47 4

 

Oct. 1, 2042

 

3.60% Notes, Series CM 3

 

November 2013

 

January 2021

 

$

997.15

 

$

400 million

 

$

400 million

 

35 2

 

N/A

 

5.15% Notes, Series CN 3

 

November 2013

 

November 2043

 

$

995.00

 

$

400 million

 

$

400 million

 

50 4

 

May 26, 2043

 

3.20% Notes, Series CO 3

 

April 2014

 

April 2021

 

$

997.39

 

$

500 million

 

$

500 million

 

30 4

 

Mar. 5, 2021

 

4.85% Notes, Series CP 3

 

Multiple 5

 

April 2044

 

$

987.915

 

$

500 million

5

$

900 million

5

46 4

 

Oct. 5, 2043

 

3.75% Notes, Series CQ 3

 

September 2014

 

January 2025

 

$

997.75

 

$

800 million

 

$

800 million

 

38.5 4

 

Oct. 17, 2024

 

4.75% Notes, Series CR 3

 

September 2014

 

January 2045

 

$

992.91

 

$

400 million

 

$

400 million

 

51.5 4

 

July 17, 2044

 

1.50% Notes, Series CS 3

 

March 2015

 

March 2018

 

$

999.62

 

$

250 million

 

$

250 million

 

N/A 6

 

N/A

 

2.35% Notes, Series CT 3

 

March 2015

 

March 2022

 

$

997.31

 

$

1.0 billion

 

$

1.0 billion

 

35.5 4

 

Feb. 28, 2022

 

4.40% Notes, Series CU 3

 

March 2015

 

January 2046

 

$

999.72

 

$

500 million

 

$

500 million

 

60.5 4

 

July 29, 2045

 

3.75% Notes, Series CV 3

 

December 2015

 

March 2026

 

$

992.14

 

$

600 million

 

$

600 million

 

53.5 4

 

Dec. 10, 2025

 

 


(1)          Interest is payable semi-annually.

(2)          The notes are redeemable at our option, in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, on not fewer than 30 and not more than 60 days’ prior notice. The redemption price is equal to the greater of (i) the present value of the notes discounted at the Government of Canada yield plus the redemption present value spread, or (ii) 100% of the principal amount thereof. In addition, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, will be paid to the date fixed for redemption.

(3)          This series of notes requires us to make an offer to repurchase the notes at a price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase upon the occurrence of a change in control triggering event, as defined in the supplemental trust indenture.

(4)          At any time prior to the respective maturity dates set out in the table, the notes are redeemable at our option, in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, on not fewer than 30 and not more than 60 days’ prior notice. The redemption price is equal to the greater of (i) the present value of the notes discounted at the Government of Canada yield plus the redemption present value spread calculated over the period to maturity, other than in the case of the Series CT and Series CU notes where it is calculated over the period to the redemption present value spread cessation date, or (ii) 100% of the principal amount thereof. In addition, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, will be paid to the date fixed for redemption. On or after the respective redemption present value spread cessation dates set out in the table, the notes are redeemable at our option, in whole but not in part, on not fewer than 30 and not more than 60 days’ prior notice, at redemption prices equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof.

(5)          $500 million of 4.85% Notes, Series CP were issued in April 2014 at an issue price of $998.74. This series of notes was reopened in December 2015 and a further $400 million of notes were issued at an issue price of $974.38.

(6)          The notes are not redeemable at our option, other than in the event of certain changes in tax laws.

 

 

50



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(c)          TELUS Corporation commercial paper

 

TELUS Corporation has an unsecured commercial paper program, which is backstopped by our $2.25 billion syndicated credit facility (see (d)) and is to be used for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures and investments. This program enables us to issue commercial paper, subject to conditions related to debt ratings, up to a maximum aggregate amount at any one time of $1.4 billion (2014 — $1.2 billion). Foreign currency forward contracts are used to manage currency risk arising from issuing commercial paper denominated in U.S. dollars. Commercial paper debt is due within one year and is classified as a current portion of long-term debt as the amounts are fully supported, and we expect that they will continue to be supported, by the revolving credit facility, which has no repayment requirements within the next year. As at December 31, 2015, we had $256 million of commercial paper outstanding, all of which was denominated in U.S. dollars (U.S.$185 million), with an effective weighted average interest rate of 0.65%, maturing in March 2016.

 

(d)         TELUS Corporation credit facility

 

As at December 31, 2015, TELUS Corporation had an unsecured, revolving $2.25 billion bank credit facility, expiring on May 31, 2019, with a syndicate of financial institutions, which is to be used for general corporate purposes, including the backstopping of commercial paper.

 

TELUS Corporation’s credit facility bears interest at prime rate, U.S. Dollar Base Rate, a bankers’ acceptance rate or London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) (all such terms as used or defined in the credit facility), plus applicable margins. The credit facility contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including two financial quarter-end financial ratio tests. These tests are that our net debt to operating cash flow ratio must not exceed 4.00:1.00 and our operating cash flow to interest expense ratio must not be less than 2.00:1.00, each as defined under the credit facility.

 

Continued access to TELUS Corporation’s credit facility is not contingent on TELUS Corporation maintaining a specific credit rating.

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Net available

 

$

1,994

 

$

2,120

 

Backstop of commercial paper

 

256

 

130

 

Gross available

 

$

2,250

 

$

2,250

 

 

We had $202 million of letters of credit outstanding as at December 31, 2015 (2014 — $164 million), issued under various uncommitted facilities; such letter of credit facilities are in addition to the ability to provide letters of credit pursuant to our committed bank credit facility. In addition, we had arranged incremental letters of credit totalling $198 million that allowed us to participate in the AWS-3 auction and 2500 MHz auction, which were held in March 2015 and in April-May 2015, respectively (see Note 17). Concurrent with funding the purchase of the spectrum licences these incremental letters of credit were extinguished.

 

(e)          TELUS Communications Inc. debentures

 

The Series 2, 3 and 5 Debentures were issued by a predecessor corporation of TELUS Communications Inc., BC TEL, under a Trust Indenture dated May 31, 1990. The Series B Debentures were issued by a predecessor corporation of TELUS Communications Inc., AGT Limited, under a Trust Indenture dated August 24, 1994, and a supplemental trust indenture dated September 22, 1995.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal face amount

 

Redemption present
value spread

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issue

 

Originally

 

financial

 

 

 

Series 1

 

Issued

 

Maturity

 

price

 

issued

 

statement date

 

Basis points

 

11.90% Debentures, Series 2

 

November 1990

 

November 2015

 

$

998.50

 

$

125 million

 

$

NIL

 

N/A (non-redeemable)

 

10.65% Debentures, Series 3

 

June 1991

 

June 2021

 

$

998.00

 

$

175 million

 

$

175 million

 

N/A (non-redeemable)

 

9.65% Debentures, Series 5 2

 

April 1992

 

April 2022

 

$

972.00

 

$

150 million

 

$

249 million

 

N/A (non-redeemable)

 

8.80% Debentures, Series B

 

September 1995

 

September 2025

 

$

995.10

 

$

200 million

 

$

200 million

 

15 3

 

 


(1)          Interest is payable semi-annually.

(2)          Series 4 debentures were exchangeable, at the holder’s option, effective on April 8 of any year during the four-year period from 1996 to 1999 for Series 5 debentures; $99 million of Series 4 debentures were exchanged for Series 5 debentures.

(3)          At any time prior to the maturity date set out in the table, the debentures are redeemable at our option, in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, on not less than 30 days’ prior notice. The redemption price is equal to the greater of (i) the present value of the debentures discounted at the Government of Canada yield plus the redemption present value spread, or (ii) 100% of the principal amount thereof. In addition, accrued and unpaid interest, if any, will be paid to the date fixed for redemption.

 

The debentures became obligations of TELUS Communications Inc. pursuant to an amalgamation on January 1, 2001, are not secured by any mortgage, pledge or other charge and are governed by certain covenants, including a negative

 

 

51



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

pledge and a limitation on issues of additional debt, subject to a debt to capitalization ratio and interest coverage test. Effective June 12, 2009, TELUS Corporation guaranteed the payment of the debentures’ principal and interest.

 

(f)           Long-term debt maturities

 

Anticipated requirements to meet long-term debt repayments, calculated upon such long-term debts owing as at December 31, 2015, for each of the next five fiscal years are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. dollars

 

 

 

Long-term debt denominated in

 

Cdn. dollars

 

 

 

Derivative liability

 

 

 

 

 

Years ending December 31 (millions)

 

Debt

 

Debt

 

(Receive) 1

 

Pay

 

Total

 

Total

 

2016

 

$

600

 

$

256

 

$

(256

)

$

242

 

$

242

 

$

842

 

2017

 

700

 

 

 

 

 

700

 

2018

 

250

 

 

 

 

 

250

 

2019

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

2020

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

Thereafter

 

8,324

 

 

 

 

 

8,324

 

Future cash outflows in respect of long-term debt principal repayments

 

11,874

 

256

 

(256

)

242

 

242

 

12,116

 

Future cash outflows in respect of associated interest and like carrying costs 2

 

6,014

 

 

 

 

 

6,014

 

Undiscounted contractual maturities (Note 4(c))

 

$

17,888

 

$

256

 

$

(256

)

$

242

 

$

242

 

$

18,130

 

 


(1)         Where applicable, principal-related cash flows reflect foreign exchange rates at December 31, 2015.

(2)         Future cash outflows in respect of associated interest and like carrying costs for commercial paper and amounts drawn under our credit facilities (if any) have been calculated based upon the rates in effect at December 31, 2015.

 

22                                  Common Share capital

 

(a)         General

 

Our authorized share capital is as follows:

 

As at December 31

 

2015

 

2014

 

First Preferred Shares

 

1 billion

 

1 billion

 

Second Preferred Shares

 

1 billion

 

1 billion

 

Common Shares

 

2 billion

 

2 billion

 

 

Only holders of Common Shares may vote at our general meetings, with each holder of Common Shares entitled to one vote per Common Share held at all such meetings so long as not less than 66-2/3% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares are owned by Canadians. With respect to priority in payment of dividends and in the distribution of assets in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any other distribution of our assets among our shareholders for the purpose of winding up our affairs, preferences are as follows: First Preferred Shares; Second Preferred Shares; and finally Common Shares.

 

As at December 31, 2015, approximately 48 million Common Shares were reserved for issuance, from Treasury, under a share option plan (see Note 13(b)).

 

(b)         Purchase of Common Shares for cancellation pursuant to normal course issuer bid

 

As referred to in Note 3, we may purchase our Common Shares for cancellation pursuant to normal course issuer bids in order to maintain or adjust our capital structure. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we purchased for cancellation our Common Shares, through the facilities of the Toronto Stock Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange and/or alternative trading platforms or otherwise as may be permitted by applicable securities laws and regulations, including privately negotiated block purchases, as set out in the following table.

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Common
Shares

 

Cost

 

Common
Shares

 

Cost

 

Normal course issuer bid period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 1, 2014 — December 31, 2014 (bid maximum reached on September 23, 2014)

 

 

$

 

13

 

$

500

 

October 1, 2014 — September 30, 2015 (bid maximum reached on September 14, 2015)

 

9

 

385

 

3

 

115

 

September 15, 2015 — September 14, 2016 1

 

7

 

250

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

$

635

 

16

 

$

615

 

 


(1)         On September 11, 2015, we announced that we had received approval for a normal course issuer bid to purchase and cancel up to 16 million of our Common Shares (up to a maximum amount of $500) from September 15, 2015, to September 14, 2016. Additionally, we have entered into an automatic share purchase plan with a broker for the purpose of permitting us to purchase our Common Shares under the normal course issuer bid at times when we would not

 

 

52



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

be permitted to trade in our own Common Shares during internal blackout periods, including during regularly scheduled quarterly blackout periods. Such purchases will be determined by the broker in its sole discretion based on parameters we have established. We record a liability and charge share capital and retained earnings for purchases that may occur during such blackout periods based upon the parameters of the normal course issuer bid as at the statement of financial position date.

 

In respect of our 2016 normal course issuer bid, during the month ended January 31, 2016, 1 million of our Common Shares were purchased by way of the automatic share purchase plan at a cost of $39.

 

The excess of the purchase price over the average stated value of Common Shares purchased for cancellation is charged to retained earnings. We cease to consider Common Shares outstanding on the date of our purchase of the Common Shares, although the actual cancellation of the Common Shares by the transfer agent and registrar occurs on a timely basis on a date shortly thereafter.

 

23          commitments and contingent liabilities

 

(a)         Leases

 

We occupy leased premises in various locations and have land, buildings and equipment under operating leases. As referred to in Note 15, we have consolidated administrative real estate and, in some instances, this has resulted in subletting land and buildings. The future minimum lease payments under operating leases are as follows:

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

As at December 31 (millions)
Years ending

 

Operating
leases with
arm’s-length
lessors 
1

 

Operating
leases with
related party
lessors 
2

 

Total

 

Operating
leases with
arm’s-length
lessors
1

 

Operating
lease with
related party
lessor 
2

 

Total

 

1 year hence

 

$

206

 

$

6

 

$

212

 

$

214

 

$

5

 

$

219

 

2 years hence

 

177

 

6

 

183

 

191

 

6

 

197

 

3 years hence

 

157

 

12

 

169

 

159

 

6

 

165

 

4 years hence

 

132

 

12

 

144

 

138

 

6

 

144

 

5 years hence

 

112

 

13

 

125

 

116

 

6

 

122

 

Thereafter

 

624

 

228

 

852

 

640

 

110

 

750

 

 

 

$

1,408

 

$

277

 

$

1,685

 

$

1,458

 

$

139

 

$

1,597

 

 


(1)         Immaterial amounts for minimum lease receipts from sublet land and buildings have been netted against the minimum lease payments in this table. Minimum lease payments exclude occupancy costs and thus will differ from future amounts reported for operating lease expenses. As at December 31, 2015, commitments under operating leases for occupancy costs totalled $907 (2014 — $873).

 

(2)         As set out in Note 18(d), we have entered into leases with the real estate joint ventures. This table includes 100% of the minimum lease payment amounts due under the leases (2014 — TELUS Garden lease only); of the total, $116 (2014 — $70) is due to our economic interests in the real estate joint ventures and $159 (2014 — $69) is due to our partners’ economic interests in the real estate joint ventures. No amount related to the TELUS Sky lease letter of intent has been included in the December 31, 2014, amounts in this table.

 

Of the total amount above as at December 31, 2015:

 

·                  Approximately 37% (2014 — 36%) of this amount was in respect of our five largest leases, all of which were for office premises over various terms, with expiry dates ranging from 2024 to 2036 (2014 — ranging from 2024 to 2034); the weighted average term of these leases is approximately 15 years (2014 — 14 years).

 

·                  Approximately 29% (2014 — 28%) of this amount was in respect of wireless site leases; the weighted average term of these leases is approximately 17 years (2014 — 16 years).

 

See Note 2 for significant changes to IFRS-IASB that are not yet effective and have not yet been applied, but will significantly affect the timing of the recognition of operating lease expenses, their recognition in the Consolidated statement of financial position, as well as their classification in the Consolidated statement of income and other comprehensive income and the Consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

(b)         Indemnification obligations

 

In the normal course of operations, we provide indemnification in conjunction with certain transactions. The terms of these indemnification obligations range in duration. These indemnifications would require us to compensate the indemnified parties for costs incurred as a result of failure to comply with contractual obligations or litigation claims or statutory sanctions or damages that may be suffered by an indemnified party. In some cases, there is no maximum limit on these indemnification obligations. The overall maximum amount of an indemnification obligation will depend on future events and conditions and therefore cannot be reasonably estimated. Where appropriate, an indemnification obligation is recorded as a liability. Other than obligations recorded as liabilities at the time of such transactions, historically we have not made significant payments under these indemnifications.

 

See Note 18(d) for details regarding our guarantees to the real estate joint ventures.

 

As at December 31, 2015, we had no liability recorded in respect of indemnification obligations.

 

 

53



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

(c)          Claims and lawsuits

 

General

 

A number of claims and lawsuits (including class actions) seeking damages and other relief are pending against us. As well, we have received notice of, or are aware of, certain possible claims (including intellectual property infringement claims) against us and, in some cases, numerous other wireless carriers and telecommunications service providers.

 

It is not currently possible for us to predict the outcome of such claims, possible claims and lawsuits due to various factors, including: the preliminary nature of some claims; uncertain damage theories and demands; an incomplete factual record; uncertainty concerning legal theories, procedures and their resolution by the courts, at both the trial and the appeal levels; and the unpredictable nature of opposing parties and their demands.

 

However, subject to the foregoing limitations, management is of the opinion, based upon legal assessments and information presently available, that it is unlikely that any liability, to the extent not provided for through insurance or otherwise, would have a material effect on our financial position and the results of our operations, including cash flows, with the exception of the following items. As referred to in Note 1(b), this is a significant judgment for us.

 

Certified class actions

 

Certified class actions against us include:

 

·                  A 2004 class action brought in Saskatchewan against a number of past and present wireless service providers, including us, which alleged breach of contract, misrepresentation, unjust enrichment and violation of competition, trade practices and consumer protection legislation across Canada in connection with the collection of system access fees. In September 2007, a national class was certified by the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in relation to the unjust enrichment claim only; all appeals of this certification decision have now been exhausted.

 

·                  A 2008 class action brought in Ontario which alleged breach of contract, breach of the Ontario Consumer Protection Act, breach of the Competition Act and unjust enrichment, in connection with our practice of “rounding up” wireless airtime to the nearest minute and charging for the full minute. In November 2014, an Ontario class was certified by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in relation to the breach of contract, breach of Consumer Protection Act, and unjust enrichment claims; all appeals of this decision have now been exhausted.

 

·                  A 2012 class action brought in Quebec alleging that we improperly unilaterally amended customer contracts to increase various wireless rates for optional services, contrary to the Quebec Consumer Protection Act and the Civil Code of Quebec. On June 13, 2013, the Superior Court of Quebec authorized this matter as a class action. This class action follows on a non-material 2008 class action brought in Quebec alleging that we improperly unilaterally amended customer contracts to charge for incoming SMS messages. On April 8, 2014, judgment was granted in part against TELUS in the 2008 class action. We had appealed that judgment, but have now settled both the 2008 and 2012 class actions. This settlement is subject to court approval.

 

·                  A 2005 class action brought against us in British Columbia alleging that we have engaged in deceptive trade practices in charging for incoming calls from the moment the caller connects to the network, and not from the moment the incoming call is connected to the recipient.

 

We believe that we have good defences to these actions. Should the ultimate resolution of these actions differ from management’s assessments and assumptions, a material adjustment to our financial position and the results of our operations, including cash flows, could result. Management’s assessments and assumptions include that a reliable estimate of any such exposure cannot be made considering the continued uncertainty about the causes of action.

 

Uncertified class actions

 

Uncertified class actions against us include:

 

·                  A 2005 class action brought against us in Alberta alleging that we have engaged in deceptive trade practices in charging for incoming calls from the moment the caller connects to the network, and not from the moment the incoming call is connected to the recipient. This is a companion class action to the certified 2005 British Columbia claim reference above;

 

·                  A 2008 class action brought in Saskatchewan against us and other Canadian telecommunications carriers alleging that, among other matters, we failed to provide proper notice of 9-1-1 charges to the public and have been deceitfully passing them off as government charges. A virtually identical class action was filed in Alberta at the same time, but the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench declared that class action expired as of 2009;

 

·                  A 2013 class action brought in British Columbia against us, other telecommunications carriers, and cellular telephone manufacturers alleging that prolonged usage of cellular telephones causes adverse health effects;

 

 

54



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

·                  A 2015 class action brought in Quebec against us, other telecommunications carriers, and various other defendants alleging that electromagnetic field radiation causes adverse health effects, creates a nuisance, and constitutes an abuse of right pursuant to Quebec laws;

 

·                  Class actions brought in 2014 against us in Quebec and Ontario on behalf of Public Mobile’s customers, alleging that changes to the technology, services and rate plans made by us contravene our statutory and common law obligations;

 

·                  A number of class actions against Canadian telecommunications carriers alleging various causes of action in connection with the collection of system access fees, including:

 

·                  Companion class actions to the certified 2004 Saskatchewan class action, filed in eight of the nine other Canadian provinces, the status of which is as follows:

 

·                  British Columbia — dismissed;

 

·                  Alberta — an application for an order that this claim has expired was dismissed in July 2015 but is under appeal;

 

·                  Manitoba — stayed, but the stay is under appeal;

 

·                  Ontario — an application to dismiss is pending;

 

·                  Quebec, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador — dormant; and

 

·                  Nova Scotia — an application by other defendants to stay the class action was initially unsuccessful, but on April 9, 2015, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal ordered that the claim be permanently and unconditionally stayed against those defendants. The plaintiff has sought leave to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court of Canada;

 

·                  A second class action filed in 2009 in Saskatchewan by plaintiff’s counsel acting in the certified 2004 Saskatchewan class action, following the enactment of opt-out class action legislation in that province. This claim makes substantially the same allegations as the certified 2004 Saskatchewan class action, and was stayed by the court in December 2009 upon an application by the defendants to dismiss it for abuse of process, conditional on possible future changes in circumstance. The plaintiff’s separate applications to appeal and lift the stay were denied in 2013;

 

·                  A class action filed in 2011 in British Columbia alleging misrepresentation and unjust enrichment. On June 5, 2014, the B.C. Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff’s application for certification of this class action. The plaintiff’s appeal of that decision was dismissed on June 9, 2015. The plaintiff has sought leave to appeal this decision to the Supreme Court of Canada; and

 

·                  A class action filed in 2013 in Alberta by plaintiff’s counsel acting in the certified 2004 Saskatchewan class action. This class action appears to be a nullity, and plaintiff’s counsel filed a replacement class action in 2014. On March 10, 2015, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench stayed the 2014 class action on an interim basis. On October 7, 2015, the Alberta Court of Appeal allowed an appeal of this decision and stayed the 2014 class action on a permanent basis.

 

We believe that we have good defences to these actions. Should the ultimate resolution of these actions differ from management’s assessments and assumptions, a material adjustment to our financial position and the results of our operations could result. Management’s assessments and assumptions include that reliable estimates of any such exposure cannot be made for the majority of these class actions considering continued uncertainty relating to the causes of action that may ultimately be pursued by the plaintiffs and certified by the courts and the nature of the damages that will be sought by the plaintiffs.

 

Intellectual property infringement claims

 

Claims and possible claims received by us include notice of one claim that certain wireless products used on our network infringe two third-party patents. The potential for liability and magnitude of potential loss cannot be readily determined at this time.

 

(d)         Concentration of labour

 

In 2015, we commenced collective bargaining with the Telecommunications Workers Union, United Steel Workers Local Union 1944, to renew a collective agreement that expired on December 31, 2015; the expired contract covered approximately 40% of our Canadian workforce as at December 31, 2015.

 

 

55



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

24          related party transactions

 

(a)         Transactions with key management personnel

 

Our key management personnel have authority and responsibility for overseeing, planning, directing and controlling our activities and consist of our Board of Directors and our Executive Leadership Team.

 

Total compensation expense for key management personnel, and the composition thereof, is as follows:

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Short-term benefits

 

$

13

 

$

11

 

Post-employment pension 1 and other benefits

 

14

 

4

 

Termination benefits

 

8

 

 

Share-based compensation 2

 

30

 

30

 

 

 

$

65

 

$

45

 

 


(1)         Our Executive Leadership Team members are either: members of our Pension Plan for Management and Professional Employees of TELUS Corporation and non-registered, non-contributory supplementary defined benefit pension plans; or members of one of our defined contribution pension plans.

 

(2)         For the year ended December 31, 2015, share-based compensation is net of $1 (2014 — $6) of the effects of derivatives used to manage share-based compensation costs (Note 13(c)). For the year ended December 31, 2015, $(6) (2014 — $5) is included in share-based compensation representing restricted stock unit and deferred share unit expense arising from changes in the fair market value of the corresponding Common Shares, which is not affected by derivatives used to manage share-based compensation costs. For the year ended December 31, 2015, share-based compensation of $7 was included in restructuring costs (Note 15).

 

As disclosed in Note 13, we made awards of share-based compensation in 2015 and 2014. In respect of our key management personnel, for the year ended December 31, 2015, the total grant-date fair value of restricted stock units awarded was $30 million (2014 — $22 million). As most of these awards are cliff-vesting or graded-vesting and have multi-year requisite service periods, the expense will be recognized ratably over a period of years and thus only a portion of the 2015 and 2014 awards are included in the amounts in the table above.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2015, key management personnel (including retirees) exercised 98,702 share options (2014 — 245,320 share options) that had an intrinsic value of $2 million (2014 — $5 million) at the time of exercise, reflecting a weighted average price at the date of exercise of $42.04 (2014 — $40.54).

 

The liability amounts accrued for share-based compensation awards to key management personnel are as follows:

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

2015

 

2014

 

Restricted stock units

 

$

21

 

$

50

 

Deferred share units 1

 

29

 

31

 

 

 

$

50

 

$

81

 

 


(1)         Our Directors’ Deferred Share Unit Plan provides that, in addition to his or her annual equity grant of deferred share units, a director may elect to receive his or her annual retainer and meeting fees in deferred share units, Common Shares or cash. Deferred share units entitle directors to a specified number of, or a cash payment based on the value of, our Common Shares. Deferred share units are paid out when a director ceases to be a director, for any reason, at a time elected by the director in accordance with the Directors’ Deferred Share Unit Plan; during the year ended December 31, 2015, $3 (2014 — $7) was paid out.

 

Employment agreements with members of the Executive Leadership Team typically provide for severance payments if an executive’s employment is terminated without cause: generally 18—24 months of base salary, benefits and accrual of pension service in lieu of notice and 50% of base salary in lieu of an annual cash bonus. In the event of a change in control, the Executive Leadership Team members are not entitled to treatment any different than that given to our other employees with respect to non-vested share-based compensation.

 

(b)         Transactions with defined benefit pension plans

 

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we provided management and administrative services to our defined benefit pension plans; the charges for these services were on a cost recovery basis and amounted to $7 million (2014 — $5 million).

 

(c)          Transactions with real estate joint ventures

 

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had transactions with the real estate joint ventures, which are related parties, as set out in Note 18 and Note 23(a).

 

 

56



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

25          additional financial information

 

(a)         Statements of financial position

 

As at December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer accounts receivable

 

4(b)

 

$

1,199

 

$

1,214

 

Accrued receivables — customer

 

 

 

128

 

120

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

4(b)

 

(52

)

(44

)

 

 

 

 

1,275

 

1,290

 

Accrued receivables — other

 

 

 

153

 

193

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,428

 

$

1,483

 

Inventories 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wireless handsets, parts and accessories

 

 

 

$

319

 

$

284

 

Other

 

 

 

41

 

36

 

 

 

 

 

$

360

 

$

320

 

Other long-term assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension assets

 

14(a)

 

$

356

 

$

49

 

Investments

 

 

 

69

 

49

 

Real estate joint ventures

 

18(c)

 

25

 

21

 

Real estate joint venture advances

 

18(c)

 

3

 

120

 

Other

 

 

 

140

 

115

 

 

 

 

 

$

593

 

$

354

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

 

$

843

 

$

857

 

Payroll and other employee related liabilities

 

 

 

410

 

399

 

Restricted stock units liability

 

 

 

58

 

122

 

 

 

 

 

1,311

 

1,378

 

Trade accounts payable

 

 

 

476

 

458

 

Interest payable

 

 

 

134

 

105

 

Other

 

 

 

69

 

78

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,990

 

$

2,019

 

Advance billings and customer deposits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advance billings

 

 

 

$

706

 

$

686

 

Regulatory deferral accounts

 

 

 

16

 

17

 

Deferred customer activation and connection fees

 

 

 

19

 

21

 

Customer deposits

 

 

 

19

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

$

760

 

$

753

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and other post-retirement liabilities

 

14(a)

 

$

451

 

$

690

 

Other

 

 

 

150

 

128

 

Restricted stock units and deferred share units liabilities

 

 

 

57

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

658

 

878

 

Regulatory deferral accounts

 

 

 

 

16

 

Deferred customer activation and connection fees

 

 

 

30

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

$

688

 

$

931

 

 


(1)         Cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2015, was $1,806 (2014 — $1,621).

 

(b)         Statements of cash flows

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Net change in non-cash operating working capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

 

$

55

 

$

(20

)

Inventories

 

 

 

(40

)

3

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

 

(22

)

(31

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

 

(60

)

173

 

Income and other taxes receivable and payable, net

 

 

 

202

 

(165

)

Advance billings and customer deposits

 

 

 

7

 

20

 

Provisions

 

 

 

72

 

(44

)

 

 

 

 

$

214

 

$

(64

)

 

GRAPHIC

 

57



 

notes to consolidated financial statements

 

Years ended December 31 (millions)

 

Note

 

2015

 

2014

 

Cash payments for capital assets, excluding spectrum licences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital asset additions, excluding spectrum licences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

16

 

$

(2,046

)

$

(1,918

)

Intangible assets

 

17(a)

 

(531

)

(441

)

 

 

 

 

(2,577

)

(2,359

)

Asset retirement obligations included in additions

 

 

 

(65

)

(172

)

 

 

 

 

(2,642

)

(2,531

)

Non-cash items included above

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in associated non-cash investing working capital

 

 

 

60

 

(6

)

Non-cash change in asset retirement obligation

 

 

 

60

 

164

 

 

 

 

 

120

 

158

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2,522

)

$

(2,373

)

Cash payments for acquisitions and related investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions and related investments

 

 

 

$

(6

)

$

(45

)

Cash acquired

 

 

 

 

1

 

Change in associated non-cash investing working capital and non-current provisions

 

 

 

(4

)

(5

)

 

 

 

 

$

(10

)

$

(49

)

Dividends paid to holders of Common Shares

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

Current period dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Declared

 

 

 

$

(1,011

)

$

(935

)

Of which was payable at end of period

 

 

 

263

 

244

 

 

 

 

 

(748

)

(691

)

Dividends declared in a previous fiscal period, payable in current fiscal period

 

 

 

(244

)

(222

)

 

 

 

 

$

(992

)

$

(913

)

Purchase of Common Shares for cancellation (excluding changes in liability for automatic share purchase plan)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normal course issuer bid purchase of Common Shares

 

 

 

$

(635

)

$

(615

)

Change in associated non-cash financing working capital

 

 

 

7

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

$

(628

)

$

(612

)

Long-term debt issued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TELUS Corporation commercial paper

 

 

 

$

5,707

 

$

4,046

 

TELUS Corporation credit facility

 

 

 

780

 

1,034

 

TELUS Corporation notes

 

 

 

2,732

 

2,193

 

 

 

 

 

$

9,219

 

$

7,273

 

Redemptions and repayment of long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TELUS Corporation commercial paper

 

 

 

$

(5,581

)

$

(3,916

)

TELUS Corporation credit facility

 

 

 

(780

)

(1,034

)

TELUS Corporation notes

 

 

 

 

(500

)

TELUS Communications Inc. debentures

 

 

 

(125

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

(6,486

)

$

(5,450

)

Interest paid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount paid in respect of interest expense

 

 

 

$

(458

)

$

(399

)

Amount paid in respect of long-term debt prepayment premium

 

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

 

 

$

(458

)

$

(412

)

 

GRAPHIC

 

58