XML 100 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Other Intangible Assets and Goodwill
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Other Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Note 6. Other Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s core deposit intangibles:

 
At or for the Years ended
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
Gross carrying value
$
27,857

 
22,404

 
28,248

Accumulated amortization
(18,345
)
 
(16,230
)
 
(19,964
)
Net carrying value
$
9,512

 
6,174

 
8,284

Aggregate amortization expense
$
2,401

 
2,110

 
2,473

Weighted-average amortization period
 
 
 
 
 
(Period in years)
9.5

 
 
 
 
Estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31,
 
 
 
 
 
2014
$
2,650

 
 
 
 
2015
2,198

 
 
 
 
2016
1,700

 
 
 
 
2017
828

 
 
 
 
2018
430

 
 
 
 


Core deposit intangibles increased $5,739,000 during 2013 due to the acquisitions of Wheatland and NCBI. For additional information relating to acquisitions, see Note 22.

The following schedule discloses the changes in the carrying value of goodwill:

 
Years ended
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
Net carrying value at beginning of period
$
106,100

 
106,100

 
146,259

Acquisitions
23,606

 

 

Impairment charge

 

 
(40,159
)
Net carrying value at end of period
$
129,706

 
106,100

 
106,100


 
The gross carrying value of goodwill and the accumulated impairment charge consists of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)
December 31,
2013
 
December 31,
2012
 
 
Gross carrying value
$
169,865

 
146,259

 
 
Accumulated impairment charge
(40,159
)
 
(40,159
)
 
 
Net carrying value
$
129,706

 
106,100

 
 


Note 6. Other Intangible Assets and Goodwill (continued)

The Company’s first step in evaluating goodwill for possible impairment is a control premium analysis. The analysis first calculates the market capitalization and then adjusts such value for a control premium range which results in an implied fair value. The control premium range is determined based on historical control premiums for acquisitions that are comparable to the Company and is obtained from an independent third party. The calculated implied fair value is then compared to the book value to determine whether the Company needs to proceed to step two of the goodwill impairment assessment. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of 2013 and determined the fair value of the aggregated reporting units exceeded the carrying value, such that the Company’s goodwill was not considered impaired. In recognition there were no events or circumstances that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2013 that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value, the Company did not perform interim testing at December 31, 2013. However, changes in the economic environment, operations of the aggregated reporting units, or other factors could result in the decline in the fair value of the aggregated reporting units which could result in a goodwill impairment in the future. Due to high levels of volatility and dislocation in prices of shares of publicly-held, exchange listed banking companies in 2011, a goodwill impairment charge was recognized by the Company during the third quarter of 2011. The method utilized for the 2011 two-step impairment analysis and the corresponding amount of the impairment charge included quoted stock market prices for other banks, discounted cash flows and inputs from comparable transactions.