-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
RKNBDvzyTgBm3YBNb/VWASVWoYajd0j5jv+Ll86m5G/1v5PJ/VLsO0IMGeYSBGXk
PvjNpKLnWQxawoMs3kLdlA==
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION __________________________________ FORM 10-KSB/A (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For transition period from ____ to ____ Commission File Number 001-10647 PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. 22 East
Broadway (978) 630-1800 Securities registered under Section
12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered under Section
12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.01 par value
Check whether the
issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __ Check if no disclosure
of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is contained in
this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant’s
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.
X The issuer’s revenues
for its most recent fiscal year were $1,464,964. The aggregate market
value of the voting stock, consisting solely of common stock, held by
non-affiliates of the issuer computed by reference to the closing price of such
stock was $3,325,138 as of August 31, 2004. The number
of shares of outstanding common stock of the issuer as of August 31, 2004 was
7,008,212. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The issuer’s Proxy
Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on November 9,
2004 is incorporated into Part III of this Form 10-KSB. PART I BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT Precision Optics
Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Massachusetts in 1982 and
has been publicly owned since November 1990. References to the
Company contained herein include its two wholly-owned subsidiaries, except where
the context otherwise requires. BUSINESS OF
ISSUER Precision Optics
Corporation, a developer and manufacturer of advanced optical instruments since
1982, designs and produces high-quality medical instruments, optical thin film
coatings, and other advanced optical systems. The Company’s medical
instrumentation line includes laparoscopes, arthroscopes and endocouplers and a
line of world-class 3-D endoscopes for use in minimally invasive surgical
procedures. Precision Optics Corporation is certified to the ISO 9001 Quality
Standard, and complies with the FDA Good Manufacturing Practices and the
European Union Medical Device Directive for CE Marking of its medical products.
The Company’s Internet Website is www.poci.com. Principal Products and Services and Methods of
Distribution. Medical
Products. The Company’s medical products
include endoscopes, as well as image couplers, beamsplitters and adapters, all
of which are used as accessories to endoscopes. Since January 1991, the
Company has developed and sold endoscopes using various optical technologies for
use in a variety of minimally invasive surgical and diagnostic procedures. The
Company’s current line of specialized endoscopes include arthroscopes (which are
used in joint surgery), laryngoscopes (which are used in the diagnosis of
diseases of the larynx), laparoscopes (which are used in abdominal surgery) and
stereo endoscopes and cameras (which are used in cardiac and general surgery,
and enable surgeons to visualize the surgical field in 3-D imagery, thus
facilitating greater finesse and minimizing surgical risk). In addition to its
existing line of endoscopes, the Company is continuing to develop different
types of endoscopes that incorporate varying types of construction and
technology for use in various medical specialties. In March 2002, the
Company shipped the first production lot of autoclavable endoscopes to a major
orthopedic equipment supplier. These endoscopes, which are also CE Mark
certified for European use, have been designed and tested to withstand
sterilization by flash and standard autoclave, as well as all other commonly
used medical sterilization means. The major benefits of autoclavable instruments
include increased patient safety, quick turnaround, and elimination of hazardous
sterilant and by-product materials, all of which provide a much better value to
the user. The Company believes its autoclavable endoscope technology will
generate opportunities for endoscope revenue growth, particularly in Europe
where autoclaving is the preferred method of sterilization. The Company developed
and has manufactured and sold since 1985 a proprietary product line of
instrumentation to couple endoscopes to video cameras. Included in this product
line are imaging couplers, which physically connect the endoscope to a video
camera system and transmit the image viewed through the scope to the video
camera. Another product, the beamsplitter, performs the same function while
preserving for the viewer an eyeport for direct, simultaneous viewing through
the endoscope. The Company has sold these devices primarily to endoscope and
video camera manufacturers and suppliers for resale under the Company’s
customers’ names. The Company’s image
couplers and beamsplitters can withstand surgery-approved sterilization. The
Company also offers autoclavable image couplers, which are able to withstand
sterilization in superheated steam under pressure. Autoclavability is a
preferred method of sterilization because of its relative speed, safety, and
efficiency. The Company believes that it is one of the few companies in the
world that produces autoclavable image couplers. Included in the
Company’s medical products sales are sales of image couplers and beamsplitters
for video-monitored examination of a variety of industrial cavities and
interiors. The Company has developed, and may develop in the future, specialized
borescopes for industrial applications. Optical Thin Films.
The Company designs and manufactures various
types of high quality thin film coatings for use in a wide range of optical
applications. Thin film coatings are produced in-house for the Company’s medical
instrumentation and other products. Presently, optical thin film manufacturing
not associated with the Company’s medical instruments and other products is
limited or very specialized. Optical System Design and Development Services. The Company provides on a contract basis advanced lens
design, imaging analysis, optical system design, structural design and analysis,
prototype production and evaluation, optics testing, and optical system
assembly. Some of the Company’s development contracts have led to optical system
production business for the Company, and the Company believes its prototype
development service may lead to new product production from time to time.
Competition and Markets. The areas in which the Company does business are highly
competitive and include both foreign and domestic competitors. Many of the
Company’s competitors are larger and have substantially greater resources than
the Company. Furthermore, other domestic or foreign companies, some with greater
experience in the optics industry and greater financial resources than the
Company, may seek to produce products or services that compete with those of the
Company. The Company may establish or use production facilities overseas to
produce key components for the Company’s business, such as lenses. The Company
believes that the cost savings from such production may be essential to the
Company’s ability to compete on a price basis in the medical products area
particularly and to the Company’s profitability generally. The Company believes
that competition for sales of its medical products and services, which have been
principally sold to medical device companies, who incorporate the Company’s
products into their systems, is based on performance and other technical
features, as well as other factors, such as scheduling and reliability, in
addition to competitive price. The Company has
marketed and sold its endoscopes to original equipment manufacturer (OEM) video
camera and video endoscopy suppliers for resale under the purchaser’s name. A
number of domestic and foreign competitors also sell endoscopes to such OEM
suppliers, and the Company’s share of the endoscope market is nominal. The
Company believes that, while its resources are substantially more limited than
its competitors, the Company can compete successfully in this market on the
basis of price and delivery. The Company currently
sells its image couplers, beamsplitters, and adapters to a market that consists
of approximately 30 to 35 potential OEM customers. These potential customers
sell video cameras, endoscopes, or video-endoscopy systems. The Company has made
sales in the past to approximately two thirds of these customers. The Company
estimates that it has approximately 20% to 30% of the market share in these
products. The Company’s primary competition in this area is the customers’ own
in-house capabilities to manufacture such products. The Company believes that
these customers typically purchase products from the Company, despite their
in-house capabilities, because they choose to devote their own technical
resources to their primary products, such as cameras or endoscopes. However, the
Company estimates that approximately 50% of the market
demand for image couplers, beamsplitters, and adapters is met by “capt ive” or
in-house capabilities. The Company offers
advanced optical design and development services not related to thin film
coatings to a wide range of potential customers and has numerous competitors.
The ability to supply design and development services to such customers is
highly dependent upon a company’s and its employees’ reputations and prior
experience. The Company has had
negligible direct export sales to date. However, during fiscal year 2002, the
Company’s medical products received the CE Mark Certification, which permits
sales into the European marketplace. Research and Development. The Company believes that its future success depends to a
large degree on its ability to continue to conceive and to develop new optical
products and services to enhance the performance characteristics and methods of
manufacture of existing products. Accordingly, it expects to continue to seek to
obtain product-related design and development contracts with customers and to
invest its own funds on its research and development. The Company spent
approximately $1,319,000 and $1,235,000 of its own funds during fiscal years
2004 and 2003, respectively, on research and development. The Company continues
to explore potential applications of single-molecule technology and
nanotechnology. Raw Materials and Principal
Suppliers. For all of the
Company’s products, except for thin film coatings, the basic raw material is
precision grade optical glass, which the Company obtains from several major
suppliers. Outside vendors grind and polish most of the Company’s lenses and
prisms. For optical thin film coatings, the basic raw materials are metals and
dielectric compounds, which the Company obtains from a variety of chemical
suppliers. Certain of the thin film coatings utilized in the Company’s products
are currently procured from an outside supplier, but most thin film coatings are
produced in-house. The Company believes that its demand for these raw materials
and thin film coating services is small relative to the total supply and that
materials and services required for the production of its products are currently
available in sufficient production quantities and will be available for fiscal
year 2005. The Company believes, however, that there are relatively few s
uppliers of the high quality lenses and prisms which its endoscopes require. The
Company has therefore established an in-house optical shop for producing
ultra-high quality prisms, micro-optics and other specialized optics for a
variety of medical and industrial applications. The Company relies, in
part, upon patents, trade secrets, and proprietary knowledge as well as
personnel policies and employee confidentiality agreements concerning inventions
and other creative efforts to develop and to maintain its competitive position.
The Company does not believe that its business is dependent upon any patent,
patent pending, or license, although it believes that trade secrets and
confidential know-how may be important to the Company’s scientific and
commercial success. The Company plans to
file for patents, copyrights, and trademarks in the United States and in
appropriate countries to protect its intellectual property rights to the extent
practicable. The Company holds the rights to several United States and foreign
patents and has several patent applications pending. The Company knows of no
infringements of its patents. The Company plans to protect its patents from
infringement in each instance where it determines that doing so would be
economical in light of the expense involved and the level and availability of
the Company’s financial resources. While the Company believes that its pending applications relate to patentable devices or concepts,
there can be no assurance that patents will be issued or that any patents issued
can be successfully defended or will effectively limit the development of
competitive products and services. Employees. As of June 30, 2004,
the Company had 30 full-time employees and 5 part-time employees. There were 17
employees in manufacturing, 11 in engineering, 2 in sales and marketing, and 5
in finance and administration. Customers. Revenues
from the Company’s largest customers, as a percentage of total revenues, were as
follows: No other customer
accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues in fiscal years 2004,
2003, and 2002. Environmental Protection and the Effect of
Existing or Probable Government Regulations on the
Business. The Company’s
operations are subject to a variety of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations relating to the discharge of materials into the environment or
otherwise relative to the protection of the environment. From time to time the
Company uses a small amount of hazardous materials in its operations. The
Company believes that it complies with all applicable environmental laws and
regulations. Need for Government Approval of Principal
Products or Services and Effect of Existing or Probable Government Regulations
on the Business. The Company currently
sells and markets several medical products, the marketing of which may require
the permission of the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).
Pursuant to the Company’s notification to the FDA of its intent to market its
endoscopes, image couplers, beamsplitters, and adapters, the FDA has determined
that the Company may market such devices, subject to the general controls
provisions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. This FDA permission was obtained
without the need to undergo a lengthy and expensive approval process, on account
of the FDA’s determination that such devices meet the regulatory standard of
being substantially equivalent to an existing approved device. Furthermore, the
Company plans to market additional endoscopes and related medical products that
may require the FDA’s permission to market such products. The Company may also
develop additional products or seek to sell some of its c urrent or future
medical products in a manner that requires the Company to obtain the permission
of the FDA to market such products, as well as the regulatory approval or
license of other federal, state, and local agencies or similar agencies in other
countries. The FDA has authority to conduct detailed inspections of
manufacturing plants in order to assure that “good manufacturing practices” are
being followed in the manufacture of medical devices, to require periodic
reporting of product defects to the FDA, and to prohibit the sale of devices
which do not comply with law. The Company conducts
its domestic operations at two
facilities in Gardner, Massachusetts. The
main Gardner facility is leased from a corporation owned by an
officer-shareholder-director of the Company. The lease terminated in December
1999 and the Company is currently a tenant at will. The other Gardner facility
is being rented on a month-to-month basis. The Company rents office space in
Hong Kong for sales, marketing and supplier quality control and liaison
activities of its Hong Kong subsidiary. The Company believes
these facilities are adequate for its current operations and adequately covered
by insurance. Significant increases in production or the addition of significant
equipment additions or manufacturing capabilities in connection with the
production of the Company’s line of endoscopes, optical thin films, and other
products may, however, require the acquisition or lease of additional
facilities. The Company may establish production facilities domestically or
overseas to produce key assemblies or components, such as lenses, for the
Company’s products. Overseas facilities may subject the Company to the political
and economic risks associated with overseas operations. The loss of or inability
to establish or maintain such additional domestic or overseas facilities could
materially adversely affect the Company’s competitive position and
profitability. None. No matters were
submitted to a vote of the Company’s security holders during the fourth quarter
of fiscal year 2004. Directors and Executive Officers of
the Company The Company’s executive
officers and directors are as follows: PART II The Company’s common
stock is listed on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated
Quotation (NASDAQ) System under the symbol “POCI.” Since January 1992, the
NASDAQ SmallCap Market has been the principal market in which the Company’s
stock is publicly traded. The high and low sales prices (as adjusted for the
1-for-6 reverse stock split that became effective on January 29, 2003) for the
Company’s stock for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal
years were as follows as reported by NASDAQ. As of August 31, 2004,
there were approximately 203 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.
Holders of record include nominees who may hold shares on behalf of multiple
beneficial owners. The Company has not
declared any dividends during the last two fiscal years. At present, the Company
intends to retain its earnings, if any, to finance research and development and
expansion of its business. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table
provides information about the Company’s Common Stock that may be issued upon
the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity
compensation plans as of June 30, 2004, including, but not limited to, the 1989
Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Incentive Plan: (1) Includes 183,153 shares of Common Stock available
for future grants under the Company’s 1997 Incentive Plan. No shares are
available for future grants under the Company’s 1989 Stock Option
Plan. (2) Includes 2,500 shares of Common Stock issuable
upon exercise of outstanding options granted to Mr. Benjamin in connection with
his service on the Board of Directors. These options may be exercised at a price
of $8.25 per share and expire on December 15, 2004. (3) Includes 2,500 shares of Common Stock issuable
upon exercise of outstanding options granted to Mr. Shannon in connection with
his service on the Board of Directors. These options may be exercised at a price
of $8.25 per share and expire on December 15, 2004. (4) Includes 4,168 shares of Common Stock issuable
upon exercise of outstanding options granted to Werner Thiel in connection with
his service as a consultant to the Company. Options exercisable for 3,334 shares
may be exercised at a price of $7.78125 and expire on July 13, 2005. Options
exercisable for 834 shares may be exercised at a price of $8.25 and expire on
December 15, 2004. Important Factors Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements When used in this
discussion, the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “intends to”, and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements
are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results
to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties, many
of which are not within the Company’s control, include, but are not limited to,
the uncertainty and timing of the successful development of the Company’s new
products, particularly in the optical thin films area, the risks associated with
reliance on a few key customers; the Company’s ability to maintain compliance
with requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market; the
Company’s ability to attract and retain personnel with the necessary scientific
and technical skills, the timing and completion of significant orders; the
timing and amount of the Company 46;s research and development expenditures; the
timing and level of market acceptance of customers’ products for which the
Company supplies components; performance of the Company’s vendors; the ability
of the Company to control costs associated with performance under fixed price
contracts; and the continued availability to the Company of essential supplies,
materials and services; which are described further in Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking
statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly release the result of any revision to these
forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances
after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview Precision Optics
Corporation, a developer and manufacturer of advanced optical instruments since
1982, designs and produces high-quality optical thin film coatings, medical
instruments, and other advanced optical systems. The Company’s medical
instrumentation line includes laparoscopes, arthroscopes and endocouplers and a
world-class product line of 3-D endoscopes for use in minimally invasive
surgical procedures. The Company is
currently developing specialty instruments incorporating its patent-pending
LENSLOCKTM technology which ensures lower cost, easier repairability and enhanced
durability as well as ultra-small instruments (some with lenses less than one
millimeter in diameter) utilizing patent-pending micro-precisionTM lens technology. The Company is also exploring new
initiatives in single-molecule technology and nanotechnology for biomedical and
other applications. Precision Optics Corporation is certified to the ISO
9001 Quality Standard, and complies with the FDA Good Manufacturing Practices
and the European Union Medical Device Directive for CE Marking of its medical
products. The Company’s Internet Website is www.poci.com.
The areas in which the Company does business are
highly competitive and include both foreign and domestic competitors. Many of
the Company’s competitors are larger and have substantially greater resources
than the Company. Furthermore, other domestic or foreign companies, some with
greater experience in the optics industry and greater financial resources than
the Company, may seek to produce products or services that compete with those of
the Company. The Company uses production facilities overseas to produce key
components for the Company’s business, such as lenses. The Company believes that
the cost savings from such production is essential to the Company’s ability to
compete on a price basis in the medical products area particularly and to the
Company’s profitability generally. The Company believes that competition for sales of
its medical products and services, which have been principally sold to original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers, is based on performance and other
technical features, as well as other factors, such as scheduling and
reliability, in addition to competitive price. The Company believes that its future success depends
to a large degree on its ability to continue to conceive and to develop new
optical products and services to enhance the performance characteristics and
methods of manufacture of existing products. Accordingly, it expects to continue
to seek to obtain product-related design and development contracts with
customers and to invest its own funds on research and development, to the extent
funds are available. The Company relies, in part, upon patents, trade
secrets and proprietary knowledge as well as personnel policies and employee
confidentiality agreements concerning inventions and other creative efforts to
develop and to maintain its competitive position. The Company does not believe
that its business is dependent upon any particular patent, patent pending, or
license, although it believes that trade secrets and confidential know-how may
be important to the Company’s scientific and commercial success. The Company conducts its domestic operations at two
leased facilities in Gardner, Massachusetts. The Company rents office space in
Hong Kong for sales, marketing and supplier quality control and liaison
activities of its Hong Kong subsidiary. The Company believes these facilities
are adequate for its current operations. Significant increases in production or
the addition of significant equipment or manufacturing capabilities in
connection with the production for the Company’s line of endoscopes, optical
thin films, and other products may, however, require the acquisition or lease of
additional facilities. Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Management’s discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the
Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial
statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. The Company believes
the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial
statements. Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes
revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”)
No. 104, Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements. SAB No. 104 requires that four
basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services
rendered; (3) the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and (4)
collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are
based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the price to the
buyer charged for products delivered or services rendered and collectibility of
the sales price. The Company assesses credit worthiness of customers based upon
prior history with the customer and assessment of financial condition. The
Company’s shipping terms are customarily FOB shipping point. Bad Debt The Company maintains allowances for doubtful
accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to
make required payments. Allowances for doubtful accounts are established based
upon review of specific account balances and historical experience. If the
financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
an impairment of their ability to make future payments, additional allowances
may be required. The Company provides for estimated obsolescence on
unmarketable inventory based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. If actual demand and market conditions are less favorable than those
projected by management, additional inventory write downs may be required.
Inventory, once written down, is not subsequently written back up, as these
adjustments are considered permanent adjustments to the carrying value of the
inventory. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived
Assets to be Disposed of The Company accounts for impairment of long-lived
assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
This statement requires that long-lived
assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured
by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered
to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by
which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Assets to be disposed of through sale are reported at the lower of the carrying
amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fiscal Year 2004 Results of
Operations Total revenues for
fiscal year 2004 of approximately $1,465,000 decreased by $934,000, or 38.9%,
from fiscal year 2003 revenues of approximately $2,399,000. The revenue decrease
from the prior year was due principally to lower unit volume sales of medical
products (down 44%), partially offset by higher unit volume sales of non-medical
products (up 50%). Medical sales were lower due primarily to lower sales of
stereo endoscope products because of the loss of business from a major stereo
endoscope customer, as previously reported. Non-medical sales were higher due
primarily to higher sales of couplers for industrial use. Revenues
from the Company’s largest customers, as a percentage of total revenues, were as
follows:
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Amendment No.
1)
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
MASSACHUSETTS
04-279-5294
(State or
other jurisdiction
(I.R.S.
Employer
of
incorporation or organization)
Identification
No.)
Gardner, Massachusetts 01440
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)
ITEM 1.
DESCRIPTION OF
BUSINESS
2004
2003
2002
Customer
A
24
%
17
%
18
%
Customer B
22
2
—
Customer C
—
44
—
Customer D
4
5
23
All Others
50
32
59
100
%
100
%
100
%
ITEM 2.
DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF
SECURITY HOLDERS
Position with
the Company
Name
or Principal
Occupation
Richard E. Forkey
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, President, Treasurer and
Director
Jack P.
Dreimiller
Senior Vice
President, Finance,
Chief Financial
Officer and Clerk
Edward A. Benjamin
Director and Member of Audit Committee. Mr.
Benjamin is a retired partner in the law firm of
Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joel R.
Pitlor
Director. Mr.
Pitlor is president of J.R. Pitlor, a
management
consulting firm based in Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
Robert R. Shannon
Director and Member of Audit Committee. Mr.
Shannon is a professor at the Optical Sciences
Center of the University of Arizona in Tucson,
Arizona.
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
2003
2004
Quarter
High
Low
High
Low
First
$
3.42
$
1.32
$
2.80
$
1.90
Second
$
4.56
$
.96
$
2.67
$
1.71
Third
$
2.40
$
1.30
$
6.99
$
1.96
Fourth
$
3.44
$
1.43
$
5.72
$
1.05
Number of
securities
to be issued
upon
Weighted-average
Number of
securities remaining
exercise
of
exercise price
of
available for
future issuance under
outstanding
options,
outstanding
options,
equity
compensation plans (excluding
warrants and
rights
warrants and
rights
securities
reflected in first column)
Equity compensation
131,953
183,153
(1)
plans approved by
shareholders
Equity
compensation
9,168
(2)(3)(4)
n/a
plans not
approved
by
shareholders
Total
141,121
183,153
ITEM 6.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2004
2003
2002
Customer
A
24
%
17
%
18
%
Customer
B
22
2
—
Customer C
—
44
—
Customer
D
4
5
23
All Others
50
32
59
100
%
100
%
100
%
Gross profit (loss) for fiscal year 2004 reflected an unfavorable change of approximately $925,000 compared to fiscal year 2003. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues decreased from 13.6% in fiscal year 2003 to a negative 40.8% in fiscal year 2004. The unfavorable change in gross profit (loss) was due primarily to lower sales volume and provisions for slow moving and obsolete inventories, partially offset by a lower manufacturing cost structure resulting from restructuring measures implemented in fiscal year 2003.
Research and development expenses increased by approximately $84,000, or 6.8%, during fiscal year 2004 compared to the previous year. The increase was due to a higher level of resources being devoted to product development activities.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $149,600, or 8.0%, during fiscal year 2004 compared to the previous year. The decrease was due primarily to lower outside consulting and legal expenses and the effects of the workforce reduction in January 2004.
The provision for asset impairment and restructuring in fiscal year 2004 of $52,208 consists of a provision for severance benefits paid in the quarter ended March 31, 2004 related to the January 2004 workforce reduction of 15%, or five employees. The provision for asset impairment and restructuring of $176,642 in fiscal year 2003, consists of a provision for severance benefits of $53,131 paid in the quarter ended December 31, 2002 related to the October 2002 workforce reduction of 16%, or six employees, and a provision for asset impairment of $123,511 recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2003, representing a further writedown of assets held for sale which reflected the continuing deterioration in the market for used telecommunications equipment.
The following table sets forth the quarterly impacts and cash payments associated with the asset impairment and restructuring provisions:
Provision For – | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Property & | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment | Patent | Employee | Idle Lease | |||||||||||||||||
Writedown | Writedown | Severance | Space | Total | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Provision Balance, June 30, 2002 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 167,971 | $ | 167,971 | ||||||||||
Quarter Ended – | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002 | — | 53,131 | — | 53,131 | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | 123,511 | — | — | — | 123,511 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total Provision | 123,511 | — | 53,131 | — | 176,642 | |||||||||||||||
Non-cash Charges | (123,511 | ) | — | — | — | (123,511 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash Payments | — | — | (53,131 | ) | (167,971 | ) | (221,102 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Provision Balance, June 30, 2003 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Quarter Ended – | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2004 | — | — | 52,208 | — | 52,208 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total Provision | — | — | 52,208 | — | 52,208 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Payments | — | — | (52,208 | ) | — | (52,208 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Provision Balance, June 30, 2004 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income decreased by approximately $47,400 or 72.4% during fiscal year 2004 compared to the previous year. The decrease was due to the lower base of cash and cash equivalents.
Interest expense consists of interest on capital lease obligations and decreased due to the liquidation of capital lease obligations during fiscal year 2004.
The income tax provisions in fiscal years 2004 and 2003 represent the minimum statutory state income tax liability.
Fiscal Year 2003 Results of Operations
Total revenues for fiscal year 2003 of approximately $2,399,000 increased by $625,000, or 35.2%, from fiscal year 2002 revenues of $1,774,000.
The revenue increase from the prior year was due principally to higher unit volume sales of medical products (up 57%), partially offset by lower unit volume sales of non-medical products (down 60%). Medical sales were higher due primarily to higher sales of stereo endoscopes and cameras. Non-medical sales were lower due primarily to the discontinuation during the last fiscal year of sales of telecommunication products.
Gross profit for fiscal year 2003 reflected a favorable change of approximately $1,676,000, compared to fiscal year 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues increased from a negative 76.0% in fiscal year 2002 to 13.6 % in fiscal year 2003. The favorable change in gross profit was due primarily to (1) a provision for excess and obsolete inventories of DWDM filters and DWDM filter test instrumentation of approximately $540,000 recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2001; (2) lower fixed manufacturing costs resulting from the cessation of operations in the Company’s optical thin film technology facility and reductions in staff; and (3) the higher overall sales volume.
Research and development expenses decreased by approximately $1,036,000, or 45.6%, during fiscal year 2003 compared to the previous year. During the fiscal year 2002, research and development expenses consisted primarily of development efforts related to DWDM filters used in telecommunications systems. The decrease in the fiscal year 2003 was due to discontinuation of the development of DWDM filters, as reflected in reductions in staff, and the remaining R&D resources being redeployed toward development of new medical products.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $199,000, or 9.6%, during fiscal year 2003 compared to the previous year. The decrease was due primarily to lower sales and marketing expenses, partially offset by approximately $40,000 in expenses related to effecting a 1-for-6 reverse stock split in the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
The provision for asset impairment and restructuring of $176,642 in fiscal year 2003 consists of a provision for severance benefits of $53,131 paid in the quarter ended December 31, 2002 related to the October 2002 workforce reduction of 16%, or six employees, and a provision for asset impairment of $123,511 recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2003, representing a further writedown of assets held for sale which reflects the continuing deterioration in the market for used telecommunications equipment. The provision for asset impairment and restructuring of $4,445,021 in fiscal year 2002 consists of (1) a provision for restructuring costs of $402,065, representing the then - present value of future lease payments related to idle space in the Company’s Optical Thin Films Technology Center, and employee severance costs; and (2) a provision for asset impairment of $4,042,956, representing a writedown to the lower of carrying value or fair market va lue less estimated selling costs of certain of the Company’s property and equipment invested in its optical thin films coating product line, and the writeoff of certain patent costs.
The loss on sale of assets held for sale of $19,171 in fiscal year 2003 represents the loss on sales of a portion of the property and equipment held for sale, which formerly was invested in the Company’s telecommunications product line. The Company received net proceeds from these sales of approximately $553,000 in the year ended June 30, 2003.
Interest income decreased by approximately $127,000, or 66.0%, during fiscal year 2003 compared to the previous year. The decrease was due to the lower base of cash and cash equivalents and lower interest rates.
Interest expense consists of interest on capital lease obligations and, for fiscal year 2002, imputed interest on accrued restructuring costs related to the present value of future lease payments on idle space. Interest expense decreased by $13,069, or 65.5%, from fiscal year 2002 due primarily to the elimination of imputed interest on restructuring costs which were paid in early fiscal year 2003.
The income tax provisions in fiscal years 2003 and 2002 represent the minimum statutory state income tax liability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has incurred significant operating losses during the last eight fiscal years. This trend was primarily the result of the loss of several significant customers, completion of several large nonrecurring government contracts, and operating losses and provision for asset impairment, restructuring, and inventory write-downs associated with the downturn in demand for optical filters used in telecommunications systems. In fiscal 1998, the Company began making significant investments in research and development and capital purchases for new products. In August 1999 and March 2000, the Company raised gross proceeds of approximately $16 million of additional cash through the issuance of common stock.
In the past three fiscal years, the Company has implemented a number of restructuring and cost saving measures in an effort to align costs with revenues and strengthen financial performance. Full-time employee headcount has been reduced from 78 at June 30, 2001 to 30 at June 30, 2004. The Company has discontinued the development and manufacturing of telecommunications products, canceled the lease on its Optical Thin Films Technology Center, and written down and/or sold certain of the property, equipment and inventories invested in its telecommunications business, and has implemented other cost reduction measures. As a result of these actions, the Company has incurred asset impairment, restructuring and inventory write-down provisions of approximately $4,985,000, $177,000 and $52,000 for the years ended June 30, 2002, 2003, and 2004 respectively, and has received net proceeds from the sale of assets held for sale of approximately $553,000 during the yea r ended June 30, 2003. In addition, the Company will continue its review of other expense areas to determine where additional reductions in discretionary spending can be achieved.
In July 2004, the Company completed a rights offering to stockholders of record at June 7, 2004 by issuing 5,256,159 shares of common stock. Net cash proceeds to the Company (after offering expenses of $177,176) were $5,078,983.
For the year ended June 30, 2004, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $3,161,000 to $343,000. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was due to cash used by operating activities of approximately $3,074,000, capital expenditures of approximately $34,000, repayment of capital lease obligation and other of approximately $4,000, expenditures for other assets (primarily patents) of $31,000 and payment of deferred financing costs of $18,000. The Company believes, based on its operating and strategic plans and the net proceeds received in July 2004 from its rights offering to stockholders, that it will have sufficient funds to conduct operations through at least the next fiscal year.
Contractual cash commitments for the fiscal years subsequent to June 30, 2004 are summarized as follows:
2005 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||
Operating leases | $ | 27,454 | $ | 2,183 | $ | 29,637 |
Trends and Uncertainties That May Affect Future Results
For the quarter ended June 30, 2004, cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $602,000 compared to a decrease of approximately $781,000 for the previous quarter ended March 31, 2004. Cash disbursements during the quarter ended March 31, 2004 included approximately $52,000 paid for employee severance costs.
Capital equipment expenditures during the year ended June 30, 2004 were approximately $33,600, up 21% from the $28,000 for fiscal year 2003. Future capital equipment expenditures will be dependent upon future sales and success of on-going research and development efforts.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2004, research and development expenses were approximately $339,000, up 1.8% from the $333,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. It is anticipated that the quarterly level of R&D expenses for the foreseeable future will remain at this lower level, but is ultimately dependent upon the Company’s assessment of new product opportunities.
The Company expects its recent pattern of quarter-to-quarter revenue fluctuations to continue, due to the uncertain timing of orders from customers and their size in relation to total revenues. The Company continues to move forward with new products and technical innovations, in particular, the development of a new generation (patent pending) of its world-class product line of 3-D endoscopes, the development of a new prototype 2.7 mm endoscope, and new instruments utilizing the Company’s new micro-precisionTM lens technology (patent pending) for endoscopes under 1 mm. The Company continues to explore potential applications of single-molecule technology and nanotechnology.
The Company believes that the recent introduction of several new products, along with new and ongoing customer relationships, will generate additional revenues, which are required in order for the Company to achieve profitability. If these additional revenues are not achieved on a timely basis, the Company will be required and is prepared to implement further cost reduction measures, as necessary.
ITEM 7. | CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: The Consolidated Financial Statements are filed on pages 17 through 36 of this Form 10-KSB. |
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Financial Statements
as of June 30, 2004 and
2003
Together with Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm’s Report
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Precision
Optics Corporation, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 31, 2004
ASSETS |
2004 |
|
2003 |
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
2004 |
|
2003 |
|||||||||
Current
Assets: |
Current
Liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents |
$ |
343,260 |
$ |
3,504,414 |
Current portion of capital lease obligation |
$ |
—
|
$ |
3,826 |
|||||||
|
Accounts payable |
235,050 |
141,398 |
|||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
approximately $155,000 in 2004 and 2003). |
80,195 |
191,669 |
Accrued employee compensation |
230,110
|
213,543 |
|||||||||||
Inventories |
917,998 |
1,257,288 |
Accrued professional services |
75,439 |
118,284 |
|||||||||||
Prepaid
expenses |
80,646 |
91,213 |
Accrued warranty expense |
50,000 |
50,000 |
|||||||||||
Deferred
financing costs |
171,885 |
— |
Other accrued liabilities |
2,743
|
6,966 |
|||||||||||
Assets
held for sale |
— |
152,550 |
|
|
||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
593,342 |
534,017 |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
current assets |
1,593,984 |
5,197,134 |
||||||||||||||
Property
and Equipment, at cost: |
Other |
— |
1,555 |
|||||||||||||
Machinery
and equipment |
3,507,065 |
3,323,760 |
||||||||||||||
Leasehold
improvements |
553,596 |
551,796 |
Commitments
(Note 2) |
|
||||||||||||
Furniture
and fixtures |
96,831 |
95,781 |
||||||||||||||
Vehicles |
42,343 |
42,343 |
Stockholders’
Equity: |
|||||||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value- |
||||||||||||||||
4,199,835 |
4,013,680 |
Authorized—20,000,000 shares |
||||||||||||||
Less—Accumulated
depreciation and amortization |
3,920,593 |
3,723,350 |
Issued and
outstanding—1,752,053 shares
at June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
17,521 |
17,521 |
|||||||||||
279,242 |
290,330 |
Additional paid-in capital |
27,770,175
|
27,770,175 |
||||||||||||
Accumulated
deficit |
(
26,283,724 |
) |
(
22,599,648 |
) | ||||||||||||
Other
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance policies |
23,032 |
39,384 |
Total stockholders’ equity |
1,503,972 |
5,188,048 |
|||||||||||
Patents,
net |
201,056 |
196,772 |
||||||||||||||
Total
other assets |
224,088 |
236,156 |
||||||||||||||
|
$ | 2,097,314 | $ |
5,723,620 |
$ |
2,097,314 |
$ |
5,723,620 |
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
||||||
Revenues |
$ |
1,464,964 |
$ |
2,399,217 |
$ |
1,774,283 |
||||
Cost
of Goods Sold |
2,062,902 |
2,072,238 |
3,123,196 |
|||||||
Gross
profit (loss) |
(597,938 |
) |
326,979 |
(1,348,913 |
) | |||||
Research
and Development Expenses |
1,319,345 |
1,235,252 |
2,270,880 |
|||||||
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses |
1,731,713 |
1,881,313 |
2,079,994 |
|||||||
Provision
for Asset Impairment and Restructuring |
52,208 |
176,642 |
4,445,021 |
|||||||
Loss
on Sale of Assets Held for Sale |
— |
19,171 |
— |
|||||||
Total
operating expenses |
3,103,266
|
3,312,378 |
8,795,895 |
|||||||
Operating
loss |
(3,701,204 |
) |
(2,985,399 |
) |
(10,144,808 |
) | ||||
Interest
Income |
18,089 |
65,443 |
192,241 |
|||||||
Interest
Expense |
(49 |
) |
(6,894 |
) |
(19,963 |
) | ||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes |
(3,683,164 |
) |
(2,926,850 |
) |
(9,972,530 |
) | ||||
Provision
for Income Taxes |
912 |
912 |
912 |
|||||||
Net
loss |
$ |
(3,684,076 |
) |
$ |
(2,927,762 |
) |
$ |
(9,973,442 |
) | |
Basic
and Diluted Loss per Share |
$ |
(2.10 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
$ |
(5.69 |
) | |
Weighted
Average Common Shares Outstanding |
1,752,053 |
1,752,053 |
1,752,053 |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
Accumulated Deficit |
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity |
|||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2001 |
1,752,053 |
$ |
17,521 |
$ |
27,770,175 |
$ |
(9,698,444 |
) |
$ |
18,089,252 |
||||||
Net
loss |
— |
— |
— |
(9,973,442 |
) |
(9,973,442 |
) | |||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2002 |
1,752,053 |
17,521 |
27,770,175 |
(19,671,886 |
) |
8,115,810 |
||||||||||
Net loss |
— |
— |
— |
(2,927,762 |
) |
(2,927,762 |
) | |||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2003 |
1,752,053 |
17,521 |
27,770,175 |
(22,599,648
|
) |
5,188,
048 |
||||||||||
Net loss |
— |
— |
— |
(3,684,076 |
) |
(3,684,076 |
) | |||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2004 |
1,752,053 |
$ |
17,521 |
$ |
27,770,175 |
$ |
(26,283,724
|
) |
$ |
1,503,972
|
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||||
Net
loss |
$ |
(3,684,076 |
) |
$ |
(2,927,762
|
) |
$ |
(9,973,442 |
) | |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities- |
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization |
240,846 |
265,102 |
593,491 |
|||||||
Provision
for asset impairment and restructuring |
— |
176,642 |
4,445,021 |
|||||||
Provision
for inventory write-down |
500,000 |
— |
540,000 |
|||||||
Loss
on sale of assets held for sale |
— |
19,171 |
— |
|||||||
Other |
— |
(6,872 |
) |
(25,345 |
) | |||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities- |
||||||||||
Accounts
receivable, net |
111,474 |
182,830 |
628,997 |
|||||||
Inventories |
(160,710 |
) |
(248,279 |
) |
(24,890 |
) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses |
10,567 |
2,361 |
16,186 |
|||||||
Refundable
income taxes |
— |
13,849 |
(13,849 |
) | ||||||
Accounts
payable |
(59,655
|
) |
22,497 |
(465,885 |
) | |||||
Accrued
restructuring expense |
— |
(221,102 |
) |
(234,094 |
) | |||||
Customer
advances |
— |
(30,000 |
) |
30,000 |
||||||
Other
accrued expenses |
(32,055
|
) |
(13,533
|
) |
(29,467 |
) | ||||
Net
cash used in operating activities |
(3,073,609 |
) |
(2,765,096 |
) |
(4,513,277 |
) | ||||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment |
(33,605 |
) |
(27,719
|
) |
(90,818 |
) | ||||
Net
proceeds from sale of assets held for sale |
— |
553,091 |
— |
|||||||
Increase
in other assets |
(31,536 |
) |
(48,686 |
) |
(56,798 |
) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(65,141 |
) |
476,686
|
(147,616 |
) | |||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||||
Repayment
of capital lease obligation and other |
(3,826 |
) |
(32,777
|
) |
(43,804 |
) | ||||
Payment
of deferred financing costs |
(18,578 |
) |
— |
— |
||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities |
(22,404
|
) |
(32,777
|
) |
(43,804 |
) | ||||
Net
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
(3,161,154 |
) |
(2,321,187
|
) |
(4,704,697 |
) | ||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year |
3,504,414 |
5,825,601 |
10,530,298 |
|||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, end of year |
$ |
343,260 |
$ |
3,504,414
|
$ |
5,825,601 |
||||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
||||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for- |
||||||||||
Interest |
$ |
49 |
$ |
6,894 |
$ |
19,963 |
||||
Income
taxes |
$ |
— |
$ |
1,
824 |
$ |
912 |
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
2004 |
|
2003 |
|||||
Raw
material |
$ |
345,483 |
$ |
679,647
|
|||
Work-in-progress |
307,522 |
379,636 |
|||||
Finished
goods |
264,993 |
198,005 |
|||||
$ |
917,998 |
$ |
1,257,288 |
Asset
Classification |
Estimated
Useful Life |
|||
Machinery
and equipment |
3-7
years |
|||
Leasehold
improvements |
Shorter
of lease term or estimated useful life |
|||
Furniture
and fixtures |
5
years |
|||
Vehicles |
3
years |
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
||||||
Customer A |
24 |
% |
17 |
% |
18 |
% | ||||
Customer
B |
22 |
2 |
- |
|||||||
Customer
C |
- |
44 |
- |
|||||||
Customer
D |
4 |
5 |
23 |
|||||||
All
Others |
50 |
32 |
59 |
|||||||
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
Year
Ended | ||||||||||
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
||||||
Net
loss, as reported |
$ |
(3,684,076 |
) |
$ |
(2,927,762 |
) |
$ |
(9,973,442 |
) | |
Add:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair
value based method for all awards |
(
61,216 |
) |
(
82,304 |
) |
(98,474 |
) | ||||
Pro
forma net loss |
$ |
(3,745,292 |
) | $ |
(3,010,066 |
) |
$ |
(10,071,916 |
) | |
Net
loss per share:
As
reported - basic and diluted |
$ |
(2.10 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
$ |
(5.69 |
) | |
Pro
forma - basic and diluted |
$ |
(2.14 |
) |
$ |
(1.72 |
) |
$ |
(5.75 |
) |
Number
of Shares |
|
Option
Price |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
||||||
Options
outstanding, June 30, 2001 |
118,669 |
$ |
6.00-75.00 |
$ |
16.38 |
|||||
Granted |
30,084 |
4.02-7.14 |
$ |
4.68 |
||||||
Canceled |
(33,984 |
) |
6.00-30.00 |
$ |
29.58 |
|||||
Options
outstanding, June 30, 2002 |
114,769 |
4.02-75.00 |
$ |
13.98 |
||||||
Granted |
3,336 |
1.74 |
$ |
1.74 |
||||||
Canceled |
(2,003 |
) |
4.02-23.064 |
$ |
9.54 |
|||||
Options
outstanding, June 30, 2003 |
116,102 |
1.74-75.00 |
$ |
13.68 |
||||||
Granted |
18,336 |
$ |
1.97 |
$ |
1.97 |
|||||
Canceled |
(2,485 |
) |
$ |
4.20-75.00 |
$ |
27.70 |
||||
Options
outstanding, June 30, 2004 |
131,953 |
$ |
1.74-75.00 |
$ |
11.79
|
|||||
Options
exercisable, June 30, 2004 |
114,807 |
$ |
1.74-75.00 |
$ |
13.11
|
|||||
Options
exercisable, June 30, 2003 |
103,897 |
$ |
1.74-75.00 |
$ |
14.34 |
|||||
Options
exercisable, June 30, 2002 |
92,742 |
$ |
4.02-75.00 |
$ |
15.18 |
|||||
Options Outstanding |
Options
Exercisable |
||||||||||||||
Range
of Exercise Prices |
Options
Outstanding |
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price |
Options
Exercisable |
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
||||||||||
$1.74-$4.56 |
45,096 |
8.30
years |
|
$3.13 |
29,033 |
|
$3.41 |
||||||||
$6.00
- $8.25 |
31,006 |
2.25
years |
|
$7.84 |
29,923 |
|
$7.87 |
||||||||
$9.38
- $13.13 |
18,504 |
2.85
years |
|
$10.93 |
18,504 |
|
$10.93 |
||||||||
$16.50 |
1,042 |
3.12
years |
|
$16.50 |
1,042 |
|
$16.50 |
||||||||
$23.064
- $33.00 |
34,971 |
3.95
years |
|
$24.35 |
34,971 |
|
$24.35 |
||||||||
$75.00 |
1,334 |
6.17
years |
|
$75.00 |
1,334 |
|
$75.00 |
||||||||
$1.74
- $75.00 |
131,953 |
4.90
years |
|
$11.79 |
114,807 |
|
$13.11 |
Number
of Shares |
|
Option
Price |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
||||||
Options
outstanding and exercisable, June 30, 2002, 2003, and 2004 |
9,168 |
$ |
7.80-8.25 |
$ |
8.08 |
|||||
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Year
Ended | ||||||||||
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
||||||
Risk-free
interest rates |
3.85 |
% |
2.36 |
% |
4.10 |
% | ||||
Expected
dividend yield |
— |
— |
— |
|||||||
Expected
lives |
7
years |
7
years |
7
years |
|||||||
Expected
volatility |
120 |
% |
131 |
% |
279 |
% | ||||
Weighted
average fair value of grants |
|
$1.77 |
|
$1.61 |
|
$4.68 |
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
||||||
Income
tax benefit at federal statutory rate |
(34.0 |
)% |
(34.0 |
)% |
(34.0 |
)% | ||||
Increase
(decrease) in tax resulting from– |
||||||||||
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
(6.0 |
) |
(6.0 |
) |
(6.0 |
) | ||||
Tax credits |
(1.6 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
(0.7 |
) | ||||
Change in valuation allowance |
30.6 |
42.0 |
40.0
|
|||||||
Expiration of tax credits |
7.3 |
— |
— |
|||||||
Other |
3.7
|
1.9
|
0.7 |
|||||||
Effective
tax rate |
0.0 |
% |
0.0 |
% |
0.0 |
% |
2004 |
|
2003 |
| ||||
Deferred
tax assets: |
|||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
$ |
8,745,000 |
$ |
7,638,000 |
|||
Tax credit carryforwards |
497,000 |
709,000 |
|||||
Reserves and accruals not yet deducted for tax purposes |
3,849,000 |
3,551,000 |
|||||
Total
deferred tax assets |
13,091,000
|
11,898,000 |
|||||
Valuation
allowance |
(11,943,000 |
) |
(10,818,000 |
) | |||
Subtotal |
1,148,000 |
1,080,000 |
|||||
Deferred
tax liabilities: |
|||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(1,148,000 |
) |
(1,080,000 |
) | |||
Net
deferred taxes |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
Provision
For – | ||||||||||||||||
Property &
Equipment Writedown |
|
Patent Writedown |
|
Employee Severance |
|
Idle Lease Space |
|
Total |
||||||||
Provision
Balance, June 30, 2001 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
||||||
Quarter Ended - |
||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2001 |
3,444,378 |
— |
— |
— |
3,444,378 |
|||||||||||
December 31, 2001 |
— |
— |
186,250 |
482,000 |
668,250 |
|||||||||||
June 30, 2002 |
541,000 |
57,578 |
— |
(266,185 |
) |
332,393 |
||||||||||
Total
Provision |
3,985,378 |
57,578 |
186,250 |
215,815 |
4,445,021 |
|||||||||||
Non-cash
Charges |
(3,985,378 |
) |
(57,578 |
) |
— | — |
(4,042,956 |
) | ||||||||
Cash
Payments |
— |
— |
(186,250 |
) |
(47,844 |
) |
(234,094 |
) | ||||||||
Provision
Balance, June 30, 2002 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
167,971 |
$ |
167,971 |
||||||
Quarter Ended - |
||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
— |
— |
53,131 |
— |
53,131 |
|||||||||||
June 30, 2003 |
123,511 |
— |
— |
—
|
123,511 |
|||||||||||
Total
Provision |
123,511 |
— |
53,131
|
— |
176,642 |
|||||||||||
Non-cash
Charges |
(123,511 |
) |
— |
— |
— |
(123,511 |
) | |||||||||
Cash
Payments |
— |
— |
(53,131 |
) |
(167,971 |
) |
(221,102 |
) | ||||||||
Provision
Balance, June 30, 2003 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
||||||
Quarter
Ended - |
||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2004 |
— |
— |
52,208 |
— |
52,208 |
|||||||||||
Total
Provision |
— |
— |
52,208 |
— |
52,208 |
|||||||||||
Cash
Payments |
— |
— |
(52,208 |
) |
— |
(52,208 |
) | |||||||||
Provision
Balance, June 30, 2004 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
(a) | Exhibits. | The exhibits listed below are filed with or incorporated by reference in this report. |
3.1 | Articles of Organization of the Company, as amended and corrected1 |
3.2 | By-laws of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.2 |
4.1 | Specimen common stock certificate3 |
4.2 | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 17, 2000 by and among the Company and the Initial Investors as defined therein4 |
4.3 | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 30, 1998 by and among the Company, Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. and Special Situations Technology Fund, L.P.5 |
4.4 | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 5, 1999 by and among the Company, Special Situations Cayman Funds, L.P., Special Situations Fund III, L.P., Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. and Special Situations Technology Fund, L.P. 6 |
4.5 | Form of Stock Purchase Warrant dated March 17, 2000 issued to each investor in March 17, 2000 private placement transaction4 |
4.6 | Warrant No. 1 dated March 17, 2000 issued to First Security Van Kasper4 |
4.7 | Warrant No. 2 dated March 17, 2000 issued to First Security Van Kasper4 |
10.1 | Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 1989 Stock Option Plan amended to date7 |
10.2 | Three separate life insurance policies on the life of Richard E. Forkey.3 |
10.3 | Master Lease Finance Agreement dated November 3, 1993 between the Company and BancBoston Leasing7 |
10.4 | Lease dated March 1, 1999, between the Company and Philip A. Wood, as executor of the Estate of Alma L. Wood and as devisee under the Will of Alma L. Wood; Martha A. Mount, devisee under the Will of Alma L. Wood; and Nancy E. Popinchalk, devisee under the Will of Alma L. Wood for 21 Pleasant Street, Gardner, Massachusetts6 |
10.5 | Amended and Restated Precision Optics Corporation, Inc. 1997 Incentive Plan.9 |
10.6 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 13, 2000 by and among the Company and the Purchasers as defined therein (excluding exhibits) 4 |
14.1 | Corporate Code of Ethics and Conduct |
21 | Subsidiaries of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.8 |
23 | Consent of KPMG LLP. |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350. |
99.1 | Important Factors Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. |
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURES
PRECISION OPTICS CORPORATION, INC. | ||
|
|
|
Date: March 18, 2005 | By: | /s/ Richard E. Forkey |
Richard E. Forkey | ||
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer |
By: /s/ Richard E. Forkey | By:/s/ Jack P. Dreimiller | |
Richard E. Forkey | Jack P. Dreimiller | |
President, Treasurer and Director (principal | Senior Vice President, Finance, | |
executive officer) | Chief Financial Officer and Clerk | |
(principal financial and accounting officer) | ||
Date: March 18, 2005 | Date: March 18, 2005 | |
By: /s/ Joel R. Pitlor | By: /s/ Edward A. Benjamin | |
Joel R. Pitlor | Edward A. Benjamin | |
Director | Director | |
Date: March 18, 2005 | Date: March 18, 2005 | |
By: /s/ Robert R. Shannon | ||
Robert R. Shannon | ||
Director | ||
Date: March 18, 2005 |
o | Labor laws, |
o | Occupational safety and health regulation, |
o | Building, safety and fire codes, |
o | Wage and hour laws, and |
o | Applicable U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations. |
1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: |
5. | The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
Date: March 18, 2005 | /s/ Richard E. Forkey | |
Richard E. Forkey | ||
Chief Executive Officer |
1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Precision Optics Corporation, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: |
5. | The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
Date: March 18, 2005 | /s/ Jack P. Dreimiller | |
Jack P. Dreimiller | ||
Chief
Financial Officer |
· | the timing of completion of significant orders |
· | the timing and amount of our research and development expenditures |
· | the costs of initial product production in connection with new products |
· | the timing of new product introductions -- both by us and by our competitors |
· | the timing and level of market acceptance of new products or enhanced versions of our existing products |
· | our ability to retain existing customers and customers’ continued demand for our products and services |
· | our customers’ inventory levels, and levels of demand for our customers’ products and services |
· | competitive pricing pressures |
Re: |
Precision
Optics Corporation, Inc. |
Form
10-KSB for the Year Ended June 30, 2004 |
· |
The
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
the filings; |
· |
Staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the
filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking
any action with respect to the filing; and |
· |
The
Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities
laws of the United States. |
1. |
We
noted on page 3 that you sell certain services to your customers in
addition to products. Supplementally, and in future filings, expand your
revenue recognition policy to: |
· |
Tell
us how you recognize revenue for services. Include in your discussion how
the company considers each of the criteria in SAB Topic
13.A.1. |
· |
Provide
details of whether any of your revenue transactions have multiple
deliverables. |
a. |
Determination
that a purchase order or sales contract properly executed by the customer
has been received and accepted, and which specifies the type of service to
be performed. |
b. |
Delivery
to the customer of the repaired product has occurred, or in the case of
engineering design and development services, that the design or a
prototype instrument has been delivered to the
customer. |
c. |
Determination
that the price specified in the customer’s purchase order or sales
contract is fixed or determinable, and is not subject to refund or
adjustment. |
d. |
Determination
that collectibility of amounts to be billed are reasonably assured based
on past experience with the customer or, in the case of new customers,
review of customer credit references, D&B reports, etc.
|
2. |
Please
also tell us at what point the sales price of products and services sold
are fixed and determinable. We noted your comment included in your
critical accounting policies and estimates whereby you state that the
“determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management’s judgments
regarding the fixed nature of the price to the buyer charged for products
delivered or services rendered …” Tell us how you considered SAB
Topic 13.A.4. |
|
Sales
price of products and services sold is fixed and determinable after
receipt and acceptance of a customer’s purchase order or properly executed
sales contract, typically before any work is performed. Management reviews
each customer purchase order or sales contract to determine that the work
to be performed is specified and there are no unusual terms and conditions
which would raise questions as to whether the sales price is fixed or
determinable. The Company does not have a history of issuing any
significant or unusual adjustments to customers on our sales transactions.
Management’s judgment is used to determine if collectibility is reasonably
assured. The Company does not have a history of experiencing significant
collection issues on amounts billed for products or
services. |
3. |
We
note your disclosures that “the company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer have conducted an evaluation of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures and based on this evaluation, the CEO
and PFO have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be
disclosed by the company in reports that it files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the applicable Securities
and Exchange Commission rules and forms.” Amend your 10-KSB to clarify, if
true, that your officers concluded that your disclosure controls and
procedures are also effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the reports that you file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to your management, including your chief
executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. See Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e).
|
4. |
We
noted that the certifications filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 were not in
the proper form. The required certifications must be in the exact form
prescribed; the wording of the required certifications may not be changed
in any respect, except for the modifications temporarily permitted to be
made to the fourth paragraph of the certification required to be filed as
Exhibit 31.1 pursuant to Part III.E of Release No. 8238. Accordingly,
please file an amendment to your Form 10-KSB that includes the entire
filing together with the certifications of each of your current CEO and
CFO in the form currently set forth in Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation
S-B. |
Very truly yours, | ||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Jack P. Dreimiller | |
Jack P. Dreimiller | ||
Chief Financial Officer |