XML 17 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

The following table provides information regarding our executive compensation and financial performance for each of the three most recent fiscal years. Compensation information includes both total compensation from the Summary Compensation Table and actual compensation paid to our Principal Executive Officers (“PEOs”), as applicable, and, in aggregate, to our other non-PEO NEOs. Financial information includes the value of an initial fixed $100 investment based on our Total Shareholder Return and Peer Group Total Shareholder Return as well as information on Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA, our company-selected measure.
Pay Versus Performance(2)
Year
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (Faricy)
Summary
Compensation
Table
Total for
PEO
(Werner)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
PEO
(Faricy)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
PEO
(Werner)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers
Average
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
Non-PEOs
Named
Executive
Officers
Value of initial fixed
$100 investment based
on:
Net
Income
(Loss)(3)
(in
millions,
$)
Selected
Measure:
 Adjusted EBITDA
(in
millions,
$)
Total
Shareholder
Return
Peer
Group(1)
Total
Shareholder
Return
(a)
(b)
 
(c)
 
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
2022
$5,512,596
 
$4,422,393
 
$2,008,044
($275,432)
$226
$236
$56
$95
2021
$8,750,415
$4,888,537
$6,960,201
$4,388,104
$1,773,457
($8,677)
$262
$249
$(37)
$75
2020
 
$1,082,098
 
$4,065,857
$1,437,313
$5,454,384
$322
$333
$475
$55
(1)
Our selected peer group was the Guggenheim Solar ETF, as shown in the “Company Stock Price Performance” chart in this proxy statement.
(2)
Amounts are determined under SEC rules (and described below), which include the individuals indicated in the table below for each fiscal year:
Year
PEO(s)
Non-PEO NEOs
2022
Peter Faricy
Guthrie Dundas, Manavendra Sial, Jason MacRae, Derek Kuzak, and June Sauvaget
2021
Peter Faricy and Thomas Werner
Manavendra Sial, Regan MacPherson, Douglas Richards, and Kenneth Mahaffey
2020
Thomas Werner
Manavendra Sial, Douglas Richards, and Kenneth Mahaffey
(3)
We do not provide pension benefits to either our PEO or our other NEOs.
Compensation Actually Paid

The following table shows how we calculated compensation actually paid to our PEO (column C) and non-PEO NEOs (column E) of the Pay versus Performance Table above, starting with Summary Compensation Table total compensation values and then making adjustments to equity awards as shown below:
Year
PEO / Other
NEOs in
Aggregate
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
Compensation
($)
Minus
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Year-End
Fair
Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Change in
Fair
Value as of
Year-End of
Any Prior
Year Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End ($)
Plus
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date
of Any Prior
Year Awards
that Vested
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
That Were
Forfeited
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Equals
Total
Compensation
Actually Paid
($)
2022
PEO
5,512,596
4,288,056
3,827,408

(316,004)

(313,551)
4,422,393
Other NEOs
2,008,044
1,337,591
1,191,653
(174,182)
(22,133)
(1,941,223)
(275,432)
2021
Faricy
8,750,415
7,274,975
5,484,761
6,960,201
Werner
4,888,537
3,989,725
2,501,708

987,585
00
4,388,104
Other NEOs
1,773,457

796,254

578,313

(635,500)

987,513
(1,916,205)

(8,677)
2020
PEO
1,082,098
1,390,488
1,593,271
4,065,857
Other NEOs
1,437,313
1,457,086
2,743,001
2,304,080

427,076
00
5,454,384
   
Company Selected Measure Name Adjusted EBITDA    
Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block]
(2)
Amounts are determined under SEC rules (and described below), which include the individuals indicated in the table below for each fiscal year:
Year
PEO(s)
Non-PEO NEOs
2022
Peter Faricy
Guthrie Dundas, Manavendra Sial, Jason MacRae, Derek Kuzak, and June Sauvaget
2021
Peter Faricy and Thomas Werner
Manavendra Sial, Regan MacPherson, Douglas Richards, and Kenneth Mahaffey
2020
Thomas Werner
Manavendra Sial, Douglas Richards, and Kenneth Mahaffey
   
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block]
(1)
Our selected peer group was the Guggenheim Solar ETF, as shown in the “Company Stock Price Performance” chart in this proxy statement.
   
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block]
Compensation Actually Paid

The following table shows how we calculated compensation actually paid to our PEO (column C) and non-PEO NEOs (column E) of the Pay versus Performance Table above, starting with Summary Compensation Table total compensation values and then making adjustments to equity awards as shown below:
Year
PEO / Other
NEOs in
Aggregate
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
Compensation
($)
Minus
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Year-End
Fair
Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Change in
Fair
Value as of
Year-End of
Any Prior
Year Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End ($)
Plus
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date
of Any Prior
Year Awards
that Vested
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
That Were
Forfeited
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Equals
Total
Compensation
Actually Paid
($)
2022
PEO
5,512,596
4,288,056
3,827,408

(316,004)

(313,551)
4,422,393
Other NEOs
2,008,044
1,337,591
1,191,653
(174,182)
(22,133)
(1,941,223)
(275,432)
2021
Faricy
8,750,415
7,274,975
5,484,761
6,960,201
Werner
4,888,537
3,989,725
2,501,708

987,585
00
4,388,104
Other NEOs
1,773,457

796,254

578,313

(635,500)

987,513
(1,916,205)

(8,677)
2020
PEO
1,082,098
1,390,488
1,593,271
4,065,857
Other NEOs
1,437,313
1,457,086
2,743,001
2,304,080

427,076
00
5,454,384
   
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 2,008,044 $ 1,773,457 $ 1,437,313
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ (275,432) (8,677) 5,454,384
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block]
Compensation Actually Paid

The following table shows how we calculated compensation actually paid to our PEO (column C) and non-PEO NEOs (column E) of the Pay versus Performance Table above, starting with Summary Compensation Table total compensation values and then making adjustments to equity awards as shown below:
Year
PEO / Other
NEOs in
Aggregate
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
Compensation
($)
Minus
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Equity
Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Year-End
Fair
Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Change in
Fair
Value as of
Year-End of
Any Prior
Year Awards
that Remain
Unvested as of
Year-End ($)
Plus
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date
of Any Prior
Year Awards
that Vested
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Plus
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
That Were
Forfeited
During
Applicable
Year ($)
Equals
Total
Compensation
Actually Paid
($)
2022
PEO
5,512,596
4,288,056
3,827,408

(316,004)

(313,551)
4,422,393
Other NEOs
2,008,044
1,337,591
1,191,653
(174,182)
(22,133)
(1,941,223)
(275,432)
2021
Faricy
8,750,415
7,274,975
5,484,761
6,960,201
Werner
4,888,537
3,989,725
2,501,708

987,585
00
4,388,104
Other NEOs
1,773,457

796,254

578,313

(635,500)

987,513
(1,916,205)

(8,677)
2020
PEO
1,082,098
1,390,488
1,593,271
4,065,857
Other NEOs
1,437,313
1,457,086
2,743,001
2,304,080

427,076
00
5,454,384
   
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block]

The following chart compares compensation actually paid to our NEOs with our TSR and our peer group TSR for 2020-2022. During the time period, SunPower’s TSR very closely matched that of our peer group. Pay did not align with TSR during the time period due to the impact of changes in compensation as a result of new PEO and NEO incumbents. TSR is not a performance metric under either our short- or long- term incentive plans.
graphic
   
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block]

The following chart compares compensation actually paid to our NEOs with our Net Income for 2020-2022. During this time period, pay did not align with Net Income due to the impact of changes in compensation as a result of new PEO and NEO incumbents. Net Income is not a performance metric under either our short- or long- term incentive programs.
graphic

   
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block]

The following chart compares compensation actually paid to our NEOs with our Adjusted EBITDA for 2020-2022. During the time period, pay did not align with Adjusted EBITDA due to the impact of changes in compensation as a result of new PEO and NEO incumbents. Adjusted EBITDA is a performance metric under our Executive Bonus Program/LIBP and our equity program.
graphic
   
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group [Text Block]

The following chart compares compensation actually paid to our NEOs with our TSR and our peer group TSR for 2020-2022. During the time period, SunPower’s TSR very closely matched that of our peer group. Pay did not align with TSR during the time period due to the impact of changes in compensation as a result of new PEO and NEO incumbents. TSR is not a performance metric under either our short- or long- term incentive plans.
graphic
   
Tabular List [Table Text Block]

For the fiscal year ending January 1, 2023, the most important financial and non-financial performance measures used to link compensation actually paid to our PEO and other NEOs to company performance are Adjusted EBITDA,
Operating Cash, Adjusted EBITDA per customer, and Customer Count. Our PEO and other NEOs’ target total compensation is heavily weighted towards these four main performance goals mentioned and noted below.
Most Important Financial Performance Measures:
Adjusted EBITDA
Operating Cash
Adjusted EBITDA per customer
Customer Count
   
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 226 262 322
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 236 249 333
Net Income (Loss) $ 56,000,000 $ (37,000,000) $ 475,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 95,000,000 75,000,000 55,000,000
Measure [Axis]: 1      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Adjusted EBITDA    
Measure [Axis]: 2      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Operating Cash    
Measure [Axis]: 3      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Adjusted EBITDA per customer    
Measure [Axis]: 4      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Measure Name Customer Count    
Peter Faricy [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 5,512,596 $ 8,750,415  
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 4,422,393 $ 6,960,201  
PEO Name Peter Faricy Peter Faricy  
Thomas Werner [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
PEO Total Compensation Amount   $ 4,888,537 $ 1,082,098
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount   $ 4,388,104 $ 4,065,857
PEO Name   Thomas Werner Thomas Werner
PEO [Member] | Peter Faricy [Member] | Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount $ (4,288,056) $ (7,274,975)  
PEO [Member] | Peter Faricy [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 3,827,408 5,484,761  
PEO [Member] | Peter Faricy [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (316,004) 0  
PEO [Member] | Peter Faricy [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (313,551) 0  
PEO [Member] | Peter Faricy [Member] | Awards Granted in Prior Years That Were Forfeited During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   0  
PEO [Member] | Thomas Werner [Member] | Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   (3,989,725) $ 0
PEO [Member] | Thomas Werner [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   2,501,708 0
PEO [Member] | Thomas Werner [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   0 1,390,488
PEO [Member] | Thomas Werner [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   987,585 1,593,271
PEO [Member] | Thomas Werner [Member] | Awards Granted in Prior Years That Were Forfeited During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount   0 0
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Grant Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (1,337,591) (796,254) (1,457,086)
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount 1,191,653 578,313 2,743,001
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of Year-End of Any Prior Year Awards that Remain Unvested as of Year-End [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (174,182) (635,500) 2,304,080
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Any Prior Year Awards that Vested During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount (22,133) 987,513 427,076
Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Awards Granted in Prior Years That Were Forfeited During Applicable Year [Member]      
Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]      
Adjustment to Compensation Amount $ (1,941,223) $ (1,916,205) $ 0