XML 31 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2021
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
COVID-19 [Policy Text Block]

COVID-19

 

In the first quarter of 2020, a new strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) emerged, creating a global health emergency that has been classified by the World Health Organization as a pandemic. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, consumer demand for both oil and gas decreased as a direct result of travel restrictions placed by governments in an effort to curtail the spread of COVID-19 and its variant strains. In addition, in March 2020, members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) failed to agree on production levels, which caused an increased supply of oil and gas and led to a substantial decrease in oil prices and an increasingly volatile market. OPEC agreed to cut global petroleum output but did not go far enough to offset the impact of COVID-19 on demand. As a result of this decrease in demand and increase in supply, the price of oil and gas decreased, which has affected our liquidity. Since that time, demand and the price of oil and gas have increased, but both remain volatile and uncertainty related to the pandemic caused by COVID-19 and its variant strains persists.  While the Company’s  commodity hedges protected its cash flows in 2020 from such price decline, and while prices have slowly risen in recent months, if oil or natural gas prices remain depressed or decline again the Company will be required to record oil and gas property write-downs.

 

In early March 2020, global oil and natural gas prices declined sharply, have since been volatile, rising in recent months, but  may decline again. The Company expects ongoing oil and gas price volatility over the short term. The full impact of COVID-19 and its variant strains and the volatility in oil prices continues to evolve as of the date of this report. As such, it is uncertain as to the full magnitude that will have on the Company. Management is actively monitoring the global situation and the impact on the Company’s  future operations, financial position and liquidity in fiscal year 2021. In response to the price volatility, the Company has taken action to reduce general and administrative costs, as well as  shutting in production in mid- March 2020, but subsequently started restoring production in mid- June, a majority of such wells were back on production in early September 2020. We have also suspended our capital expenditures indefinitely. 

 

Going Concern Qualification, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Going Concern

 

Our present level of indebtedness and the recent commodity price environment present challenges to our ability to comply with certain covenants in our credit facilities, and under applicable auditing standards, the independent accountants' opinion on our  financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s  ability to continue as a “going concern”    At December 31, 2020, we had a total of $95.0  million outstanding under our First Lien Credit Facility, $112.7 million under our Second Lien Credit Facility, and total indebtedness of  $220.5 million including a $10.0 million exit fee. As of June 30, 2021, we had a total of  $88.5  million outstanding under our First Lien Credit Facility, $132.1 million under our Second Lien Credit Facility, including a  $10.0 million exit fee, and total indebtedness of  $223.3  million. Additionally, we have a liability of approximately $9.9 million related to the termination of our hedging agreements. If interest expense increases as a result of higher interest rates or increased borrowings, more cash flow from operations would be used to meet debt service requirements.

 

Specifically, with regard to our credit agreements, we did not satisfy the first lien debt to consolidated EBITDAX ratio covenant under our First Lien Credit Facility as of the December 31, 2020 measurement date and such failure represented an event of default under our First Lien Credit Facility. In addition,  we do not anticipate that we will  maintain compliance with the Second Lien Credit Facility total leverage ratio covenant or the minimum asset coverage ratio (as defined in Note 5) both of which will be  first tested as of September 30, 2021, over the next twelve months and, accordingly, the audit report prepared by our auditors with respect to the financial statements in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 included an explanatory paragraph expressing uncertainty as to our ability to continue as a “going concern”.  The inability to maintain compliance with certain covenants of our Second Lien Credit Facility would represent an additional default under our First Lien Credit Facility as of the end of any such future fiscal quarters. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the “going concern”  uncertainty.

 

We are evaluating the available financial alternatives and are in discussion with our lenders seeking additional waivers or amendments to the covenants or other provisions of our credit facilities to address any current and future default relating to the covenants in question. The existing defaults at March 31, 2021 were subject to forbearance agreements with our lenders that expired on  May 6, 2021. We are also in discussions with our lenders regarding further forbearance, but no assurance can be provided that we will be able to enter into any additional forbearance agreements. If, upon a future default, the Company is unable reach an agreement with its lenders or find acceptable alternative financing, the lenders under the Company’s  First Lien Credit Facility  may choose to accelerate repayment. If the Company’s  lenders accelerate the payment of amounts outstanding under its credit facilities, the Company does not currently have sufficient liquidity to repay such indebtedness and would need additional sources of capital to do so. The Company could attempt to obtain additional sources of capital from asset sales, public or private issuances of debt, equity or equity-linked securities, debt for equity swaps, or any combination thereof. However, the Company cannot provide any assurances that it will be successful in obtaining capital from such transactions on acceptable terms, or at all. 

 

Under applicable accounting principles these circumstances are deemed to create substantial doubt regarding the Company’s  ability to continue as a “going concern”. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a “going concern”  basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and other commitments in the normal course of business for the twelve-month period following the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. As such, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and their carrying amount, or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a “going concern”.

 

In April 2021, we received notice that certain of our hedging agreements were being terminated as a result of events of default under the First Lien Credit Facility, and we voluntarily terminated most of our other  hedging arrangements. As a result of the settlement of the terminated hedges, we have outstanding obligations of $9.9 million. These obligations were added to the outstanding balance under our First Lien Credit Facility and will accrue interest at the default interest rate, currently 8.75%,  until repaid. Our remaining  hedging agreement  may also be terminated as a result of such events of default. The settlement of terminated hedging agreements may result in losses and limit our ability to reduce exposure to adverse fluctuations in oil and gas prices. See Note 10 “Events of Default” for current information regarding non-compliance with certain covenants.

 

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Consolidation Principles

 

The terms “Abraxas,” “Abraxas Petroleum,” “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Abraxas Petroleum Corporation and all of its subsidiaries, including Raven Drilling, LLC (“Raven Drilling”).

 

Rig Accounting [Policy Text Block]

Rig Accounting

 

In accordance with SEC Regulation S-X, no income is recognized in connection with contractual drilling services performed in connection with properties in which we or our affiliates hold an ownership, or other economic interest. Any income not recognized as a result of this limitation is credited to the full cost pool and recognized through lower amortization as reserves are produced.

 

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Share-based Payment Arrangement [Policy Text Block]

Stock-Based Compensation, Option Plans and Warrants

 

Stock Options

 

We currently utilize a standard option-pricing model (i.e., Black-Scholes) to measure the fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors.

 

The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for the periods presented: 

 

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

 

June 30,

  

June 30,

 

2021

  

2020

  

2021

  

2020

 
$1  $(5) $(22) $61 

 

 

The following table summarizes our stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2021, (in thousands):

 

  Number of Shares  Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share  Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share 

Outstanding, December 31, 2020

  196  $49.69  $35.03 

Cancelled/Forfeited

  (121) $43.63  $30.90 

Expired

  (15) $84.34  $62.02 

Balance, June 30, 2021

  60  $53.50  $36.81 

    

As of June 30, 2021, there was no unamortized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options.

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

Restricted stock awards are awards of common stock that are subject to restrictions on transfer and to a risk of forfeiture if the recipient of the award terminates employment with us prior to the lapse of the restrictions. The fair value of such stock was determined using the closing price on the grant date and compensation expense is recorded over the applicable vesting periods.

 

The following table summarizes our restricted stock activity for the six months ended June 30, 2021

 

  

Number of Shares (thousands)

  

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share

 

Unvested, December 31, 2020

  41  $31.37 

Vested/Released

  (23) $32.80 

Cancelled/Forfeited

      

Unvested, June 30, 2021

  18  $31.17 

 

The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock for the periods presented: 

 

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

 

June 30,

  

June 30,

 

2021

  

2020

  

2021

  

2020

 
$116  $312  $315  $472 

 

As of   June 30, 2021, there was approximately $0.3 million of unamortized compensation expense relating to outstanding restricted shares that will be recognized during the remainder of  2021 through June 2022.

 

Performance Based Restricted Stock

 

We issue performance-based shares of restricted stock to certain officers and employees under the Abraxas Petroleum Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Employee Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. The shares will vest in three years from the grant date upon the achievement of performance goals based on our Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) as compared to a peer group of companies. The number of shares which would vest depends upon the rank of our TSR as compared to the peer group at the end of the three-year vesting period and can range from zero percent of the initial grant up to 200% of the initial grant.

 

The table below provides a summary of Performance Based Restricted Stock as of the date indicated:

 

  

Number of Shares (thousands)

  

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share

 

Unvested, December 31, 2020

  44  $33.73 

Expired

  (15) $47.40 

Unvested, June 30, 2021

  29  $26.80 

 

Compensation expense associated with the performance based restricted stock is based on the grant date fair value of a single share as determined using a Monte Carlo Simulation model which utilizes a stochastic process to create a range of potential future outcomes given a variety of inputs. As the Compensation Committee intends to settle the performance based restricted stock awards with shares of our common stock, the awards are accounted for as equity awards and the expense is calculated on the grant date assuming a 100% target payout and amortized over the life of the awards.

 

 The following table summarizes our stock-based compensation expense related to performance based restricted stock for the periods presented: 

 

Three Months Ended

  

Six Months Ended

 

June 30,

  

June 30,

 

2021

  

2020

  

2021

  

2020

 
$79  $62  $214  $66 
               

 

As of June 30, 2021, there was approximately $0.2 million of unamortized compensation expense relating to outstanding performance based restricted shares that will be recognized during the remainder of  2021 through April 1, 2022.

 

Warrants for Common Stock

 

As of June 30, 2021, outstanding warrants to purchase shares of common stock were as follows:

 

Issuance Date

Exercisable for

Expiration Date

 

Exercise Price

  

Number of Shares

 
           

August 11, 2020

Common Stock

August 11, 2025

 $0.20   1,672,290 

 

In connection with the amended Second Lien Credit Agreement, on August 11, 2020, the Company issued a warrant to the lender to purchase a total of 33,445,792 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. As a result of the  October 19, 2020 a reverse stock split of the Company’s  authorized, issued and outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1-for-20, thus the warrant was adjusted to provide that the lender may purchase a total of 1,672,290 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share the warrant is  exercisable immediately, in whole or in part, on or before five years from the issuance date. The fair value of the warrant was recorded as debt issuance costs, presented in the consolidated balance sheets as a deduction from the carrying amount of the note payable, and is being amortized over the loan term. 

 

Oil and Gas Properties Policy [Policy Text Block]

Oil and Gas Properties

 

We follow the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties.  Under this method, all direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with the acquisition of properties and successful and unsuccessful exploration and development activities are capitalized. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of capitalized oil and gas properties and estimated future development costs, excluding unproved properties, are based on the unit-of-production method based on proved reserves.  Net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, less related deferred taxes, are limited by country, to the lower of unamortized cost or the cost ceiling, defined as the sum of the present value of estimated future net revenues from proved reserves based on unescalated prices discounted at 10%, plus the cost of properties not being amortized, if any, plus the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties included in the costs being amortized, if any, less related income taxes. Costs in excess of the present value of estimated net revenue from proved reserves discounted at 10% are charged to proved property impairment expense.  No gain or loss is recognized upon sale or disposition of oil and gas properties for full cost accounting companies with proceeds accounted for as an adjustment of capitalized cost. An exception to this rule occurs when the adjustment to the full cost pool results in a significant alteration of the relationship between capitalized cost and proved reserves. We apply the full cost ceiling test on a quarterly basis on the date of the latest balance sheet presented. At June 30, 2021, the net capitalized costs of oil and gas properties did not exceed. the cost ceiling of our estimated proved reserves. At June 30, 2020, the net capital cost of oil and gas properties exceeded the cost ceiling of our estimated proved reserves  resulting in an impairment of $54.9 million and $81.6  million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.  

 

Asset Retirement Obligation and Environmental Cost [Policy Text Block]

Restoration, Removal and Environmental Liabilities

 

We are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may require us to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of petroleum substances at various sites.  Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit.  Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and that have no future economic benefit are expensed.

 

Liabilities for expenditures of a non-capital nature are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted unless the timing of cash payments for the liability or component is fixed or reliably determinable.

 

We account for future site restoration obligations based on the guidance of ASC 410 which addresses accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. ASC 410 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset’s retirement obligation be recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset. For all periods presented, we have included estimated future costs of abandonment and dismantlement in our full cost amortization base and amortize these costs as a component of our depletion expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

The following table summarizes our future site restoration obligation transactions for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020:

 

  

June 30, 2021

  

December 31, 2020

 

Beginning future site restoration obligation

 $7,360  $7,420 

New wells placed on production and other

  -   43 

Deletions related to property sales

  (2,845)  (216)

Deletions related to plugging costs

  (127)  (235)

Accretion expense

  180   414 

Revisions and other

  203   (66)

Ending future site restoration obligation

 $4,771  $7,360 

 

 

In April 2021, the Company divested various non-Bakken properties in North Dakota and Montana, primarily for plugging liability. The result of the transaction was a decrease of approximately $2.7 million in future site development liability, with a corresponding reduction in the full cost pool.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards 

 

Effective January 1, 2020, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 and its related amendments.  This ASU primarily applies to the Company’s  accounts receivable, of which the majority are due within 30 days. The Company monitors the credit quality of its counterparties through review of collections, credit ratings, and other analysis. The Company develops its estimated allowance for credit losses primarily using an aging method and analysis of historical loss rates as well as consideration of current and future conditions that could impact its counterparties’ credit quality and liquidity. The adoption and implementation of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s  financial statements.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 840): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting” (“ASU 2020-04”), which provides companies with optional guidance to ease the potential accounting burden associated with transitioning away from reference rates (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)) that are expected to be discontinued. ASU 2020-04 allows, among other things, certain contract modifications, such as those within the scope of Topic 470 on debt, to be accounted as a continuation of the existing contract. This ASU was effective upon the issuance and its optional relief can be applied through December 31, 2022. The Company will consider this optional guidance prospectively, if applicable.

 

In May 2020, the SEC adopted final rules that amend the financial statement requirements for significant business acquisitions and dispositions. Among other changes, the final rules modify the significance tests and improve the disclosure requirements for acquired or to be acquired businesses and related pro forma financial information, the periods those financial statements must cover, and the form and content of the pro forma financial information. The final rules do not modify requirements for the acquisition and disposition of significant amounts of assets that do not constitute a business. The final rules are effective January 1, 2021, but earlier compliance is permitted. The Company will consider these final rules and update its disclosures, as applicable.