UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.__)
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☒ Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☐ Definitive Proxy Statement
☐ Definitive Additional Materials
☐ Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
☒ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT – SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
Dear Stockholders,
In connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the J. R. Hyde III, Store Support Center in downtown Memphis on December 18th, 2024, it is my honor to address you, our owners, on key developments that have occurred since our last annual meeting.
For the first time in nearly two decades, our board of directors (“board”) facilitated a rigorous and robust succession planning process which lasted over three years culminating in the selection of Phil Daniele, who on January 2nd, 2024, became AutoZone’s fifth Chief Executive Officer in our rich history. We recently completed our annual review processes of the board and its committees and during that exercise, every director reported being very pleased with the process and ecstatic with the outcome.
As part of the succession planning process, the board also requested that I remain Chairman of the Board and move into an Executive Chairman role. In this role, I’m pleased to continue to work with Phil and our talented Executive Committee (the senior most leaders of the management team). While I thoroughly enjoy working with the team in this capacity, sharing my experiences, perspectives and historical knowledge, it is important for everyone to have clarity – my role is one of advisor, coach, sounding board and mentor - Phil, in his role as President and CEO, is the ultimate decision maker. These changes resulted in us splitting the roles of Chairman and CEO for the first time since 2007. In our shareholder outreach, we’ve heard mixed perspectives on having these roles combined or split. Our board believes in optimizing the structure based on the talents and capabilities of the leadership at the time and we will evaluate future structures when appropriate. Today, our plan is to utilize this structure for the foreseeable future.
Our board is constantly working to enhance its performance and, as part of this quest for continuous improvement, for the fourth time in the last 12 years, we hired a third party to lead and facilitate a formal 360 review process for each member of the board. These reviews were both quantitative and qualitative and included feedback from several of our key Executive Committee members. Also, this year, we comprehensively evaluated our corporate governance principles which were initially developed in the early 2000s. Our fresh assessment of these principles led to robust discussions about important topics like age and tenure limits, committee rotations and the number of public boards on which our directors may serve. The Board ultimately decided not to set arbitrary age or tenure limits. Instead, it prefers to hold itself accountable to effectively self-govern and refresh when appropriate.
We are proud of the diversity of the Board. As we have learned over the years, diverse backgrounds, experiences and perspectives lead to better decisions and performance. In evaluating our board today, we note that we have an emerging tenure issue, as our overall tenure is higher than the S&P 500. Accordingly, we, as a board, are committed to refreshment and will do so in a thoughtful and disciplined manner. Recently, two of our directors, Enderson Guimaraes and D. Bryan Jordan, have shared their intentions to not stand for re-election this December. These changes will result in our board consisting of nine directors and we will begin a formal search process led by a third party to help us identify one or two incremental directors.
I want to thank Enderson and Bryan for their service to our company for more than a decade. They both have brought unique perspectives that they willingly share with our board and management team enriching the discussions and leading to better outcomes.
Historically, our say-on-pay vote has been in the high eighties or low nineties. Last year, our say-on-pay vote dropped into the high seventies. In response to this lower percentage, the chair of our compensation committee, along with our Vice President of Investor Relations, reached out to our shareholders to discuss our compensation program. We shared our approach and philosophy, resulting performance and we listened and have made changes to our program, which are reflected in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis report enclosed. I recommend you review this in-depth disclosure, as we believe our program is a crucial part of our success.
We continued our cadence of publishing our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Report in mid-April. This report reflects the progress we’ve made in pursuit of our 2025 and 2030 environmental goals and our work to meet our aspirational goal in 2050.
Over the course of the last few months, we have held off-season engagement with you, our owners, representing approximately 50% of shares outstanding sharing these changes and listening to your thoughts and ideas. We thank you for sharing and have taken your feedback to heart.
On behalf of the Board, I invite you to join us for our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and as always, we appreciate your investment in us and your continued support.
Sincerely,
Bill Rhodes Executive Chairman |
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS | ||||||
DATE AND TIME | PLACE | RECORD DATE | ||||
December 18, 2024 | J. R. Hyde III Store Support Center 123 S. Front Street Memphis, Tennessee 38103 | Close of business on | ||||
ITEMS OF BUSINESS | ||||||
1. Election of 9 directors | ||||||
2. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year | ||||||
3. Advisory vote on the compensation of named executive officers | ||||||
4. Advisory vote on reducing the ownership threshold to call special meeting of shareholders | ||||||
5. Shareholder proposal | ||||||
In addition, we will transact such other business properly brought before the meeting. VOTING Your vote is important. We strongly encourage you to submit your vote as promptly as possible through the Internet, by telephone or by mailing your completed and signed proxy card (or voting instruction form, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or nominee). For more specific instructions on how to vote, please see page 79. MEETING MATERIALS This Proxy Statement and our 2024 Annual Report are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.investors.autozone.com. Additionally, you may access our proxy materials at www.envisionreports.com/AZO. ATTENDING THE MEETING We are holding the 2024 Annual Meeting at the J. R. Hyde III Store Support Center located at 123 S. Front St, Memphis, Tennessee 38103. For additional information on how you may attend or vote at the meeting, please see page 79. | ||||||
Memphis, Tennessee | By Order of the Board of Directors, Jenna M. Bedsole |
PROXY SUMMARY
This Proxy Summary provides general information about AutoZone and highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please refer to the entire Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2024 before you vote. In this Proxy Statement, we use the term “AutoZone,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” to refer to AutoZone, Inc.
MEETING INFORMATION
DATE & TIME | LOCATION | RECORD DATE | |||
December 18, 2024 | J. R. Hyde III Store Support Center, 123 S. Front Street, Memphis, Tennessee 38103 | Shareholders of record as of the close of business on October 21, 2024 are entitled to vote. |
ITEMS OF BUSINESS
Proposal Number | Board Recommendation | Page | |
1. | Election of 9 directors | FOR | 25 |
2. | Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year | FOR | 31 |
3. | Approval of an advisory vote on the compensation of named executive officers | FOR | 33 |
4. | Advisory vote on reducing the ownership threshold to call a special meeting of shareholders | FOR | 34 |
5. | Shareholder Proposal | AGAINST | 35 |
VOTING
We strongly encourage you to submit your vote as promptly as possible through the Internet, by telephone or by mailing your completed and signed proxy card (or voting instruction form, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or nominee). You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote in-person.
Internet | Telephone | At the Meeting | |||||
Visit the website on your proxy card, voting instruction form or electronic communications. | Call the telephone number on your proxy card, voting instruction form or electronic communications. | Sign, date and return your proxy card or voting instruction form in the enclosed envelope. | Attend the Annual Meeting and vote in-person. |
For more specific instructions on how to vote as well as how to attend the Annual Meeting, please see page 79.
ABOUT THESE MATERIALS
We began mailing our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to each shareholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on or about XXXXXXXXX, 2024. Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) has sent you this Proxy Statement to solicit your vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
AutoZone Highlights | |||||
FY24 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS* ● $18.5 Billion in Revenue and $149.55 Diluted Earnings per Share ● Completed $3.2 billion in Share Repurchases ● Average of 21.1% Total Shareholder Return (TSR) for past 20 years ● 7,353 Stores Globally, including 6,432 in the U.S., 794 in Mexico and 127 in Brazil ● 5,898 Commercial Programs in the U.S. For more information, see: AutoZone’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2024 (the “FY24 Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). | |||||
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ● Board Leadership consists of Executive Chairman and Lead Independent Director ● Disciplined succession planning efforts resulted in appointment of new President and Chief Executive Officer with over 30 years of AutoZone tenure and nearly 40 years of industry experience ● Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees (the “Standing Committees”) made up entirely of Independent Directors ● Use of Third-Party Firm for 2021 and 2024 Board Evaluations ● Review and update of Corporate Governance Principles in FY24, which includes Board Diversity Policy ● Committee charters reflect strong oversight of environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters For more information, see: Corporate Governance beginning on page 7. | |||||
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ● Significant portion of executive’s compensation is variable or at-risk ● Annual Incentive Plan tied to economic profit, as a function of Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (“EBIT”) and Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) ● Robust Shareholder Engagement led by Chair of the Compensation Committee to understand Say-On-Pay Vote ● Compensation plans and practices reviewed to ensure they do not encourage excessive risk-taking ● Stock Ownership Guidelines aligned to compensation strategy For more information, see: Compensation, Discussion & Analysis beginning on page 38. | |||||
SHAREHOLDER ENGAGMENT ● Conduct year-round outreach through our Board leadership, senior management, investor relations and legal teams to understand shareholders’ perspectives, priorities and concerns ● In the Summer and Fall of 2024, invited investors representing 67% of shares outstanding to discuss corporate governance, leadership transition and say-on-pay For more information, see: Shareholder Engagement on page 21 and, for compensation-related engagement, page 41. | |||||
* Information reflected as of, and for the fiscal year ended, August 31, 2024, as applicable
Disclaimer: The contents of any websites, reports or other materials are not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and do not constitute a part of this proxy statement.
CULTURE ● Our Pledge and Values foster a strong, unique and powerful culture of teamwork and customer service. Every AutoZoner, from the Board of Directors and CEO Team (Vice Presidents and above) to AutoZoners in our stores, strive to Live the Pledge. ● Meetings at AutoZone begin with our Cheer and Pledge, to remind us of our commitment to customer satisfaction and our promise to put customers first, and an Extra Miler Story, to recognize fellow AutoZoners for living our Pledge and Values and taking care of our customers. ● We believe our commitment to living the Pledge and Values and strong culture of recognition is what sets us apart from our competitors and drives our success. | |||||
HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ● Approximately 126,000 AutoZoners Globally ● Named to Forbes World’s Best Employers for 2021, 2022 and 2023 ● Significant diversity of backgrounds, experiences and tenures represented on the Board and Executive Committee ● Six Business Resource Groups (“BRGs”) supported by a cross-functional Diversity Council and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) Steering Committee ● Published EEO-1 compliance disclosure in ESG Report For more information, see: Our most recent ESG Report at investors.autozone.com. | |||||
Forward Looking Statements: Certain statements contained in this proxy statement, including statements about our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These are based on assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are discussed in more detail in the “Risk Factors” section contained in Item 1A under Part 1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2024. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
2024 Proxy Statement | 3 |
Board of Directors Nominees
The following tables do not include information about Enderson Guimaraes and D. Bryan Jordan, each of whom have notified the Company of their intention not to stand for reelection.
Name and Principal | Independent | Age | Director | Diversity | Committee Membership | |||||||||||
Gender | Ethnicity | Audit | Comp | NomGov | ||||||||||||
Philip B. Daniele, III President and CEO of AutoZone, Inc. | 55 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||
Michael A. George Former President and CEO of Qurate Retail | 63 | 2022 | M | |||||||||||||
Linda A. Goodspeed Former Managing Partner and COO of WealthStrategies Financial Advisors | 62 | 2013 | M | M | ||||||||||||
Earl G. Graves, Jr. President and CEO of Black Enterprise | Lead | 62 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Brian P. Hannasch Former President and CEO of Alimentation Couche-Tard | 58 | 2022 | M | |||||||||||||
Gale V. King Former EVP and Chief Administrative Officer of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company | 68 | 2018 | M | |||||||||||||
George R. Mrkonic, Jr. Former Non-Executive Chairman of Maru Group | 72 | 2006 | M | |||||||||||||
William C. Rhodes, III Executive Chairman and former President and CEO of AutoZone, Inc. | 59 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||
Jill A. Soltau Former CEO of J.C. Penney Company, Inc. | 57 | 2018 | M | |||||||||||||
indicates Committee Chairperson “Lead” indicates Lead Independent Director | “CEO” indicates Chief Executive Officer “COO” indicates Chief Operating Officer “EVP” indicates Executive Vice President |
4 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
BOARD Skills
Core Skills | Distinct Strengths | |||||
Leadership | 9 / 9 | Retail & Consumer | 8 / 9 | |||
Financial Literacy | 9 / 9 | International | 5 / 9 | |||
Other Public Company Board Experience | 7 / 9 | Technology | 7 / 9 | |||
Strategy & Business Development | 9 / 9 | CEO Experience | 6 / 9 | |||
Risk Management | 9 / 9 | Financial Expertise | 5 / 9 | |||
Supply Chain | 6 / 9 | |||||
Human Capital Management | 7 / 9 |
BOARD COMPOSITION
Independence | Diversity of Independent Directors | |||||
Independent | 7 / 9 | Gender | 3 / 7 | |||
Not Independent | 2 / 9 | Race / Ethnic | 2 / 7 | |||
Age of Independent Directors | Tenure of Independent Directors | |||||
50 – 59 years | 2 / 7 | 0-5 Years | 2 / 7 | |||
60 – 69 years | 4 / 7 | 6-10 Years | 2 / 7 | |||
70+ years | 1 / 7 | 11-15 Years | 1 / 7 | |||
16+ Years | 2 / 7 |
Executive Committee AT-A-Glance
Diversity | DEI Leadership* | Tenure |
Female: ●●● | BRG Sponsors: ●●●●●● | 0-10 Years: ●●●●● |
Black: ●●● | DEI Council Members: ●●●●● | 11-20 Years: |
Hispanic / Latin: ● | 21+ Years: ●●●●●●● | |
Two or More Races: ● | ||
Total: 12 Executive Committee Members |
* Refers to leadership, support and promotion of the Company’s DEI initiatives, through serving as an Executive Sponsor of a BRG, a member of the DEI Council or a member of the DEI Steering Committee.
AutoZone is committed to continuing to build a diverse organization that represents our customers and the communities in which we serve. This commitment to diversity begins at the top, and we are proud of the quality, strength, experience, tenure and racial, ethnic and gender diversity of both our Board and our Executive Committee.
2024 Proxy Statement | 5 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
AutoZone has a long-standing commitment to promoting the long-term interests of our customers, AutoZoners and shareholders. In furtherance of this commitment, the Board has adopted a comprehensive governance framework to allow it to provide effective oversight and make informed decisions relating to the business, strategy, risk, culture and more. The following section discusses key aspects of our corporate governance structure, principles and practices.
Governance Framework
Board leadership structure
We do not have an express policy on whether the roles of Board Chairman and Chief Executive Officer should be combined or separated. Instead, the Board prefers to maintain the flexibility to determine which leadership structure best serves the interests of our shareholders. If the positions of the Chairman of the Board and CEO are held by the same person, or if the Chairman is employed by or not independent of AutoZone, then the Board will select an independent director to serve as the Lead Independent Director.
Currently, our Board believes that having an Executive Chairman, a Lead Independent Director, Independent Committee Chairs, Independent Committee members for all Standing Committees and a substantial majority of Independent Board members provides the best Board structure for AutoZone. Additionally, the Board believes having an Executive Chairman with a newly appointed CEO allows for a more thoughtful leadership transition among management and at the Board level. This structure, together with our other corporate governance practices, provides strong independent oversight of management while ensuring clear strategic alignment throughout the Company.
The Board has regularly reevaluated this leadership structure as part of the Board evaluation and Board succession planning processes to ensure these important governance matters are considered thoroughly and holistically.
Lead Independent Director
Earl G. Graves, Jr. Lead Independent Director | Our Lead Independent Director, Earl G. Graves, Jr., is a non-employee director who is elected by the Board annually. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide our Lead Independent Director with clearly defined responsibilities as follows: ● Presides at all executive sessions of the independent directors of the Board (without management present) at every regularly scheduled Board meeting; ● Chairs Board meetings when the Chairman is not present; ● Works with management to determine the information and materials to be provided to the Board; ● With Chairman, approves Board meeting agendas, schedules, and other information to be provided to the Board; ● Consults with the Chairman and the CEO on such other matters as are pertinent to the Board and the Company; ● Has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors; ● Is available for direct communication and consultation with stockholders upon reasonable request; and ● Serves as a liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors. |
In addition, our Lead Independent Director, Mr. Graves, currently serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which enables him to ensure the governance practices of the Board are best suited for the needs of the Company and its shareholders. In this capacity, Mr. Graves and the other independent members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversee Board evaluations and Board refreshment, among other things.
Director independence
As stated in AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, a substantial majority of the Board of Directors should be independent in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Board annually assesses each director’s independence after reviewing relevant relationships involving the director and AutoZone. As part of this review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board considered all such relationships involving AutoZone’s non-employee directors, including the below matters.
Ordinary Course Transactions and Business Relationships. The Company routinely procures goods or services from various entities for which a director or his or her immediate family member may be affiliated. During FY24, all such transactions were conducted in the ordinary course of business and on an arms-length basis.
● | Ms. Soltau is a member of the board of directors of Southwest Airlines Co. from which AutoZone purchased airline tickets. |
● | Mr. Hannasch is Special Advisor to the President and Chief Executive Officer of Alimentation Couche-Tard, which operates Circle K convenience stores from which AutoZone purchased miscellaneous goods. |
● | Mr. Jordan is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of First Horizon Corporation. First Horizon holds various AutoZone deposit accounts and participates in one of AutoZone’s supplier confirmed receivables programs (under which some AutoZone vendors are borrowers, but AutoZone is not a party to those agreements). |
● | Ms. King is a member of the board of directors of Unum Group from which AutoZone procured group insurance benefits. |
Current or Prior Employment of Immediate Family Member. Directors may have an immediate family member who is an AutoZoner. In FY24, all such employment relationships were in a non-officer capacity and all compensation-related decisions were made in a manner that is consistent with internal practices and policies.
Charitable Contributions or Event Sponsorships. The Company periodically makes donations to not-for-profit organizations or sponsors events with which Board members or their immediate family members may be affiliated. During FY24, all such contributions were conducted in the ordinary course of business and consistent with AutoZone’s charitable giving guidelines or otherwise in furtherance of a business purpose.
As such, the Board concluded that none of these transactions were, individually or cumulatively, material to AutoZone and also did not materially benefit any director, directly or indirectly. Accordingly, the Board affirmatively determined that none of Mses. Goodspeed, King, or Soltau or Messrs. George, Graves, Guimaraes, Hannasch, Jordan or Mrkonic has a material relationship with the Company other than in their capacity as a Board member and that all of them are independent within the meaning of the AutoZone Corporate Governance Principles, the NYSE listing standards and applicable law. The Board also determined that Messrs. Rhodes and Daniele are not independent since each is an employee of the Company.
COMMITTEES. AutoZone’s Board has three standing committees, each consisting solely of independent directors—the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Standing Committees”). Additional information about each of the Committees is included below.
8 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS. The key governance documents and policies adopted by the Board are:
● | Corporate Governance Principles; |
● | Charters for its Audit, Compensation, and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees; |
● | Code of Conduct for all directors, officers and employees; |
● | Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Executives; and |
● | Policy on Political Contributions and Lobbying Engagements. |
The Board reviews these corporate governance documents and policies from time to time and revises them when it believes it serves the interests of the Company and its shareholders to do so, such as in response to changing governance practices or legal requirements. For example, in fiscal year 2024, following the CEO succession, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, together with input and feedback from all Board members, conducted a thorough review and update of the Corporate Governance Principles. Each of these documents is available on our website at investors.autozone.com and is also available, free of charge, in print to any shareholder who requests it.
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL & GOVERNANCE REPORTS. As part of our commitment to continuous improvement and maximizing long-term shareholder value, the Company’s commitment to sustainability has expanded over time. AutoZone has published an ESG Report, and the most current version of this report covering the 2023 Fiscal Year is available on our website at www.investors.autozone.com.
Our website and the information contained therein or linked thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Proxy Statement. Further, our ESG Report is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this Proxy Statement or incorporated by reference herein or into any of our other filings with the SEC.
Risk Oversight
Oversight of risk management is a responsibility of the Board and is an integral part of the Board’s oversight of AutoZone’s business. The primary responsibility for the identification, assessment and management of the various risks faced by AutoZone resides with AutoZone’s management. The Board is primarily responsible for ensuring that management has established and adequately resourced processes for identifying and preparing the Company to manage risks effectively.
Strategic Planning and Operating Risks
The Board reviews the Company’s principal strategic and operating risks as part of its regular discussion and consideration of AutoZone’s strategy and operating results. The Board also regularly reviews with the General Counsel legal matters that may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with laws, and any material reports received from regulatory agencies.
Financial Risks
The Audit Committee is involved in the Board’s oversight of risk management. At each of its regular meetings, the Audit Committee reviews the Company’s major financial exposures and the steps management has taken to identify, assess, monitor, control, remediate and report such exposures. The Audit Committee, along with management, also evaluates the effectiveness of the risk avoidance and mitigation processes in place.
Enterprise Risks
To assist with risk management and oversight, AutoZone has adopted the concept of Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) using the framework issued in 2004 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s Vice President of Internal Audit, who reports directly to the Audit Committee, has been charged with leading the Company’s ERM processes with the assistance of Company management. The Vice President of Internal Audit presents to the Audit Committee a comprehensive review of the Company’s ERM processes quarterly. This presentation includes an overview of all significant risks that
2024 Proxy Statement | 9 |
have been identified and assessed and the strategies developed by management for managing such risks. The Vice President of Internal Audit leads open discussions with the Audit Committee members to analyze the significance of the risks identified and seeks to verify that the list is all-inclusive. Company management is also involved in these discussions to ensure that the Board gains a full understanding of the risks and the strategies that management has implemented to manage the risks.
Information Security Risks
The Audit Committee, in connection with its oversight of the Company’s ERM processes described above, reviews and discusses the Company’s information security risks directly with the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer. This review takes place at each routine, quarterly committee meeting and includes a discussion of significant threats, risk mitigation strategies, any IT security program assessments and identified improvements. Additionally, information security matters are included within a broader IT update which is periodically presented to the full Board of Directors.
Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)
The Board exercises its oversight responsibilities of ESG matters both as a full Board and through its committees as appropriate for the subject matter. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has primary responsibility for assisting the Board in overseeing Board governance policies and practices, AutoZone’s DEI efforts, ESG reporting and ESG-related shareholder engagement efforts. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews and discusses with management the alignment between AutoZone’s compensation programs and human capital management strategy. The Audit Committee provides oversight of the regulatory environment as part of ERM, including with respect to environmental and safety compliance.
Environmental risk is currently a matter of shared oversight. For example, reporting of initiatives and goals relating to our greenhouse gas emissions is overseen by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee as part of their oversight of ESG reporting; oversight of environmental-related compliance is overseen by the Audit Committee; and to the extent environmental matters present a strategic risk or opportunity, such issues are overseen by the full Board. Each of the Committees provide reports and feedback to the full Board for its collective review and discussion.
10 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
Board and Committee Meetings
Board Meetings and Attendance
During FY24, the Board held 4 meetings. The non-management members of our Board regularly meet in executive sessions in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting, with our Lead Independent Director, Mr. Graves, presiding at these sessions. All directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and their assigned committees during FY24. All directors are expected to attend our annual meetings of shareholders. At our 2023 Annual Meeting, all directors were present and available to answer questions.
Audit Committee
Meetings in FY24: 9 Members: ● D. Bryan Jordan (Chair) ● Michael A. George ● Linda A. Goodspeed ● George R. Mrkonic, Jr. Independent: All Qualifications: The Board has determined that each Committee member meets the qualifications of an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC and is financially literate as defined by the NYSE. | The Audit Committee assists the Board in overseeing the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; the independent auditor’s qualification, independence and performance; the performance of the Company’s internal audit function, and the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Accordingly, the Audit Committee has responsibility for: ● evaluating, appointing or dismissing, determining compensation for, and overseeing the work of the independent public accounting firm employed to conduct the annual audit, which reports to the Audit Committee; ● conducting periodic reviews with Company officers, management, independent auditors, and the internal audit function; ● reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor the Company’s annual audited financial statements, quarterly financial statements, internal controls report and the independent auditor’s attestation thereof, and other matters related to the Company’s financial statements and disclosures; ● overseeing the Company’s internal audit function; and ● reporting routinely to the Board and making recommendations. |
2024 Proxy Statement | 11 |
Compensation Committee
Meetings in FY24: 5 Members: ● George R. Mrkonic, Jr (Chair) ● Linda A. Goodspeed ● Brian Hannasch ● Gale V. King Independent: All Qualifications: The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the additional independence requirements of the SEC and NYSE applicable to Compensation Committee members. | The Compensation Committee has responsibility for: ● reviewing and approving AutoZone’s compensation philosophy, strategy and objectives; ● reviewing and approving the compensation programs, plans, policies and awards for executive officers; ● leading the independent directors in the evaluation of the performance of the CEO in meeting established goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO; ● acting as administrator of AutoZone’s short- and long-term incentive plans and stock or stock-based plans; ● reviewing the compensation of AutoZone’s non-employee directors from time to time and recommending to the full Board any changes that the Compensation Committee deems necessary; and ● reviewing and discussing with management the alignment between AutoZone’s compensation programs, company strategy and human capital management strategy. |
NOMINating and corporate governance Committee
Meetings in FY24: 3 Members: ● Earl G. Graves, Jr (Chair) ● Enderson Guimaraes ● D. Bryan Jordan ● Jill A. Soltau Independent: All | The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has responsibility for: ● ensuring that qualified candidates are presented to the Board for election as directors; ● assisting the Board in its oversight of AutoZone’s ESG practices, including DEI and any related significant reporting and shareholder engagement efforts; ● assisting the Board in developing criteria and procedures for the evaluation of the Board, its committees and directors; and ● reviewing and recommending changes to AutoZone’s Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, and Corporate Governance Principles with the aim of best serving the interests of the shareholders. |
12 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
Board Composition
Personal Characteristics and Core Competencies
The Board believes each individual director should possess certain personal characteristics, and that the Board as a whole should possess certain core competencies. Such personal characteristics are integrity and accountability, informed judgment, financial literacy, mature confidence, high performance standards, and passion. They should also have demonstrated the confidence to be truly independent, as well as be business savvy, have an owner orientation and have a genuine interest in AutoZone. Core competencies of the Board as a whole, include accounting and finance, business judgment, management expertise, crisis response, industry knowledge, international markets, strategy and vision. These characteristics and competencies are set forth in more detail in AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on AutoZone’s website at investors.autozone.com.
DIRECTOR SKILLS
The Board believes it can be most effective in exercising its responsibilities when it is made up of individuals who collectively possess a diverse, yet balanced, set of skills, qualifications and expertise gained from different experiences and professional settings. As such, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the skills represented on the Board, which then provides a foundation for Board refreshment, Board succession planning and director nominations.
In 2023, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee refreshed its method of reviewing and evaluating Board skills in an effort to (i) develop a more meaningful skills matrix that reflects each individual’s strengths and expertise and (ii) better communicate to shareholders the key qualifications that each director nominee brings to the Board. In doing so, the Committee identified a certain set of “core skills” which nearly all directors possess because these skills are integral to carrying out the Board’s responsibilities. In addition to these “core skills,” the Committee identified certain “distinct strengths” which our directors possess. These strengths allow our Board, as a whole, to offer a comprehensive set of experiences, perspectives and expertise to guide our decision making. In some instances, we have intentionally sought more candidates with a specific attribute, such as CEO experience or retail industry experience, because such experience is particularly relevant to our business and valuable to our Board. In other instances, we have considered a candidate as a whole and concluded that he or she presents a variety of strengths that add to the richness of our Board. As a result, we may have a larger number of Board members with a particular strength or attribute; but it is our belief that all of these skills and experiences are of value and together allow for more thoughtful dialog and more effective execution of Board responsibilities.
2024 Proxy Statement | 13 |
Attribute | What this means | Why it’s valuable to AutoZone |
CORE SKILLS | ||
Leadership | Experience serving as a senior executive of a significant enterprise. | Having proven successful leadership experience allows our Board to guide, challenge and oversee management with thoughtful and practical insights and perspectives. |
Financial Literacy | Ability to read and understand financial statements, financial ratios and other indices for evaluating company performance. | Financial literacy is a necessary attribute in order to provide meaningful input on key business decisions and ensure we continue to drive long-term shareholder value. |
Board Experience | Experience sitting on the Board of a public company, currently or previously. | Serving on another public company Board yields insights on trends and best practices regarding strategy, corporate governance, operations, customer insights, executive compensation, risk oversight and other matters impacting board effectiveness. |
Strategy & Business Development | Experience developing and executing upon long-term strategic plans, growth strategies and capital allocation plans. | A key function of the Board is to oversee strategy so that AutoZone is, and remains, well-positioned for long-term, profitable growth and success. |
Risk Management | Experience overseeing or managing enterprise risk management or other functions involving significant operational, financial or legal risk. | Having first-hand experience identifying and managing risk equips the Board to carry out its risk oversight function most effectively, whether such risks are overseen by the Board as a whole or by a particular Committee. |
DISTINCT STRENGTHS | ||
Retail & Consumer | Experience at a retailer or other consumer facing company, such as food and beverage or other consumer products. | We greatly value the experiences and learnings of other retailers and consumer facing businesses, whether it relates to driving operational efficiencies, building customer loyalty or sourcing the best merchandise. |
International | Experience with international operations or expansion into new international markets. | Managing operations in different countries presents unique and complex challenges. Directors with relevant experience can offer considerable insights as we continue to improve and expand our international operations. |
Technology | Experience with assessing opportunities and risks of new technologies and digital platforms. | Knowledge or experience with new and emerging technologies provides valuable perspectives as we develop our omni-channel strategy, build out our technology infrastructure, manage our IT investments and seek to mitigate cybersecurity and other IT-related risks. |
CEO Experience | Experience serving as the senior most leader of an organization. | Directors who have served as their organization’s CEO or senior most leader have a unique appreciation for the challenges attendant to the role, such as building and leading a strong management team and balancing the interests of numerous stakeholders. |
Financial Expertise | Proficiency in complex financial planning, capital allocation and/or financial reporting processes. | Directors with deep financial expertise can offer significant insights and perspectives on our efforts to invest in sustained, profitable growth, while also challenging us to build robust financial controls and to manage actual and potential risks to the business. |
Supply Chain | Experience with managing and designing supply chains, ranging from global footprints to last mile solutions. | The efficiency of our supply chain and distribution network is critical to our success both in the near-term and as we strategically position the Company for sustainable, long-term growth. |
Human Capital Management | Experience managing a large or global workforce. | As a global enterprise with approximately 126,000 AutoZoners, we are a people-first culture and are keenly focused on managing and developing our workforce. |
14 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
Daniele | George | Goodspeed | Graves | Hannasch | King | Mrkonic | Rhodes | Soltau | Total (#) | Total (%) | |||||||||||
CORE SKILLS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Leadership | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 9 | 100% | ||||||||||
Financial Literacy | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 9 | 100% | ||||||||||
Board Experience | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 7 | 78% | ||||||||||||
Strategy and Business Development | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 9 | 100% | ||||||||||
Risk Management | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 9 | 100% | ||||||||||
DISTINCT STRENGTHS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail & Consumer | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 8 | 89% | |||||||||||
International | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 5 | 56% | ||||||||||||||
Technology | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 7 | 78% | ||||||||||||
CEO Experience | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 6 | 67% | |||||||||||||
Financial Expertise | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 5 | 56% | ||||||||||||||
Supply Chain | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 6 | 67% | |||||||||||||
Human Capital Management | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 7 | 78% |
BOARD DIVERSITY
Consistent with AutoZone’s Pledge and Values, the Board embraces diversity in its broadest sense and believes it is important to have directors with diverse thoughts, skills, knowledge and backgrounds. As stated in the Corporate Governance Principles, when evaluating candidates for nomination as new directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will ensure that the initial list of candidates from which new director nominees are considered include candidates with diversity of race, ethnicity or gender. And from such list, the Board will continue to select the best candidate to fill the role. | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
DIVERSITY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gender | 30% | 33% | 30% | 30% | 33% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ethnic / Racial | 30% | 33% | 30% | 30% | 22% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Reflects Board composition as of the annual meeting for such year. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independent Directors | |||||||||||
Daniele | Rhodes | George | Goodspeed | Graves | Hannasch | King | Mrkonic | Soltau | Total (#) | Total (%) | |
DIVERSITY | |||||||||||
Gender | ● | ● | ● | 3 | 33% | ||||||
Ethnic / Racial | ● | ● | 2 | 22% |
2024 Proxy Statement | 15 |
Board Refreshment
The Board has a variety of mechanisms in place to promote Board refreshment in a manner that aligns with the long-term interests of AutoZone and its shareholders. In particular, the Board relies upon thorough and meaningful evaluations as well as a resignation policy in the event a director experiences a change in professional role or responsibility.
The Board does not have an age-based or tenure-based resignation policy. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and full Board reconsidered the issue this past fiscal year. After extensive discussion on the topic, the Board continues to believe neither can adequately assess an individual director’s contribution, engagement and value to the overall effectiveness of the Board. Instead, we believe thoughtful succession planning and reflection of the Board’s overall composition allow us to refresh the makeup of the Board in a more organic and intentional manner. In fact, this commitment to refreshment is evidenced by the fact that we have had eight directors with an average age of 66 choose not to stand for reelection over the last decade.
Independent Directors | ||||||||||||||||||||
Daniele | Rhodes | George | Goodspeed | Graves | Hannasch | King | Mrkonic | Soltau | Total (#) | Total (%) | ||||||||||
TENURE | ||||||||||||||||||||
0-5 Years | ● | ● | ● | 2 | 22% | |||||||||||||||
6-10 Years | ● | ● | 2 | 22% | ||||||||||||||||
11-15 Years | ● | 1 | 11% | |||||||||||||||||
15+ Years | ● | ● | ● | 2 | 22% |
Director Tenure. The Board regularly considers the tenure of our independent directors, noting that Mr. Graves and Mr. Mrkonic have each served on the Board for greater than 15 years. Mr. Graves brings a wealth of experience and historical knowledge regarding the Board and how it has been most effective in executing its oversight responsibilities. Mr. Mrkonic has a deep understanding of both the Company as well as the retail industry as a whole, allowing him to challenge the status quo and offer insightful perspectives on matters of strategy, operations and corporate governance. For these reasons, the Board believes each of Mr. Graves and Mr. Mrkonic continues to be a valued member of the Board.
AutoZone has historically had a very tenured management team as is the case today. Just as we believe a “tenured” management team is a huge asset and key contributor of our tremendous success in delivering returns in excess of 15% compounded annually when measured over a 10, 20 or even 30-year period, we believe having seasoned board members is equally important. Similarly, our tenure on the management team could become a weakness if we didn’t successfully recruit new AutoZoners who have differentiated skills and experiences as we have done with the addition of four new Executive Committee members from outside the company in the last five years. We have the same beliefs on our Board composition. Overall, we need to have a broad set of skills and experiences. As we work through Board succession and overall tenure, we don’t simply apply a first-in-first-out methodology. Instead, we thoughtfully explore the skills, contributions and experiences we believe are most important in the ensuing years while also ensuring we have sufficient objectivity, freshness of perspectives and independence.
Board Evaluations
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews and approves the process by which the Board, its Committees and the individual directors conduct an evaluation. These evaluations help inform Board succession planning as well as contribute to different enhancements that may allow the Board to carry out its roles and responsibilities more effectively. The annual Board and Committee evaluation process is typically administered by the Corporate Secretary’s office. However, the Board has routinely engaged a third-
16 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
party consultant to administer the process every few years to ensure the process remains dynamic and intentional. For example, for the fourth time in the past 11 years, at the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board evaluation was administered by an independent, third-party in 2024 and consisted of both survey data and one-on-one interviews. These findings were then aggregated, analyzed and reported to the full Board collectively and specific feedback was provided to each individual director. These qualitative and quantitative assessments provide detailed feedback to each director on their strengths and opportunities for enhanced contributions. They also facilitate more open dialog regarding directors’ intentions on service and serve as a key tool to Board succession planning.
Director Nominations
Prior to each annual meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers incumbent directors and other qualified individuals, if appropriate, as potential director nominees. In evaluating a potential nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the personal characteristics described above, reviews the composition of the full Board and reflects upon learnings from the Board evaluations to determine the areas of expertise and core competencies needed to enhance the effectiveness of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board also consider the specific experiences and skills that an individual nominee possesses and how such experiences might be of value to the Board and the management team. Finally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider other factors such as the size of the Board, whether a candidate is independent, the listing standards requirements of the NYSE and how many other public company directorships a candidate holds.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying potential nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through current Board members, shareholders or other persons. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may retain a search firm or other consulting firm from time to time to identify potential nominees. Nominees recommended by shareholders in accordance with the procedure described below, i.e., submitted in writing to AutoZone’s Secretary, accompanied by the biographical and business experience information regarding the nominee and the other information required by Article III, Section 1 of AutoZone’s Eighth Amended and Restated By-Laws (the “By-Laws”), will receive the same consideration as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s other potential nominees.
Director Nominations by Shareholders
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s policy is to consider director candidate recommendations from shareholders if they are submitted in writing to AutoZone’s Secretary in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article III, Section 1 of By-Laws, including biographical and business experience, information regarding the nominee and other information required by such provision in the By-laws. Copies of the By-Laws will be provided upon written request to AutoZone’s Corporate Secretary and are also available on AutoZone’s website at investors.autozone.com.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under AutoZone’s By-laws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than AutoZone’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) no later than October 19, 2025.
2024 Proxy Statement | 17 |
Director Compensation
AutoZone’s current director compensation program became effective January 1, 2024 (the “Director Compensation Program”).
Annual Retainer Fees. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer fee (the “Annual Retainer”). Furthermore, each director is eligible to receive an additional fee (“Additional Fee”), the amount of which varies depending on his or her role. The Additional Fees and the Annual Retainer, enumerated below, together comprise the “Director Compensation”. There are no meeting fees.
Director Compensation Components |
| ($) |
Annual Retainer |
| 270,000 |
Additional Fees: |
|
|
Lead Director |
| 35,000 |
Audit Committee Chair |
| 30,000 |
Audit Committee Member |
| 15,000 |
Compensation Committee Chair |
| 25,000 |
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Chair |
| 20,000 |
Under the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Award Plan (the “2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan”) and Director Compensation Program, non-employee directors receive Director Compensation in the form of immediately vested Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). A non-employee director may elect to receive a fixed portion of the Annual Retainer plus any Additional Fees in the form of cash, paid in quarterly installments (the “Cash Election”), with the remainder of the Annual Retainer paid in the form of RSUs. The Cash Election during calendar year 2024 was $100,000 but all directors elected to receive compensation fully in RSUs. All RSUs are granted on January 1 of the applicable calendar year.
If a non-employee director is elected to the Board, or assumes a different position, after January 1, he or she will receive the Annual Retainer and/or Additional Fees, prorated based on the number of days remaining in the calendar year, for RSUs, or the number of days remaining in the quarter, for cash, as applicable.
RSUs granted to non-employee directors are fully vested on the date of grant and become payable, or are settled, on the date on which the non-employee director ceases to be a director (the “Payment Date”), or at the director’s election, on the first or fifth anniversary of the grant date. Upon timely delivery of an election form, a non-employee director may elect to receive payment on the date on which he or she ceases to be a director. RSUs are payable in shares of AutoZone common stock no later than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the tax year in which such Payment Date occurs.
COMPENSATION-SETTING PROCESS. The Compensation Committee reviews the Board’s compensation on a biennial basis to ensure that non-employee directors are reasonably compensated in relation to AutoZone’s peer group companies (discussed in detail under Benchmarking) and to comparable U.S. companies in general. AutoZone’s 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan contains a dollar limit of $750,000 on the total amount of annual compensation payable to its non-employee directors, provided that the Board may make exceptions to this limit under extraordinary circumstances.
18 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
Director Compensation Table
This table shows the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during the 2024 fiscal year.
| Fees |
| Stock |
| ||
Paid in Cash | Awards | |||||
($) | ($) | Total | ||||
Name (1) | (2) | (3)(4) | ($) | |||
Michael A. George |
| — |
| 285,000 |
| 285,000 |
Linda A. Goodspeed |
| — |
| 285,000 |
| 285,000 |
Earl G. Graves, Jr. |
| — |
| 325,000 |
| 325,000 |
Enderson Guimaraes |
| — |
| 270,000 |
| 270,000 |
Brian P. Hannasch | — | 270,000 | 270,000 | |||
D. Bryan Jordan |
| — |
| 300,000 |
| 300,000 |
Gale V. King |
| — |
| 270,000 |
| 270,000 |
George R. Mrkonic, Jr. |
| — |
| 310,000 |
| 310,000 |
Jill A. Soltau |
| — |
| 270,000 |
| 270,000 |
(1) | Each of Philip B. Daniele, III and William C. Rhodes, III serves on the Board but does not receive any compensation for his service as a director. Their respective compensation as employees of the Company are shown in the Summary Compensation Table on page 66. |
(2) | This column represents the portion of the Director Compensation that was paid in cash and earned in fiscal year 2024 pursuant to the Cash Election, as described above. |
(3) | The “Stock Awards” column represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 for awards of Restricted Stock Units under the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan during fiscal year 2024. See Note B Share-Based Payments, to our consolidated financial statements in the FY24 Form 10-K for a discussion of our accounting for share-based awards and the assumptions used. The aggregate number of outstanding awards of common stock under the AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan (“Stock Units”) and Restricted Stock Units held by each director at the end of fiscal 2024 are shown in the following footnote 4. See the section titled “Share Ownership Information” beginning on page 76 for more information about our directors’ stock ownership. |
(4) | As of August 31, 2024, each current non-employee director had the following aggregate number of outstanding Restricted Stock Units and Stock Units: |
| Restricted |
| ||
Stock | Stock | |||
Units | Units | |||
Name | (#) | (#) | ||
Michael A. George |
| 332 |
| — |
Linda A. Goodspeed |
| 2,802 |
| — |
Earl G. Graves |
| 4,958 |
| 3,417 |
Enderson Guimaraes |
| 3,155 |
| — |
Brian P. Hannasch | 719 | — | ||
D. Bryan Jordan |
| 3,098 |
| — |
Gale V. King |
| 1,170 |
| — |
George R. Mrkonic, Jr. |
| 3,470 |
| 1,405 |
Jill A. Soltau |
| 1,087 |
| — |
2024 Proxy Statement | 19 |
Stock Ownership Requirement. The Board has established a stock ownership requirement for non-employee directors. Each director is required to own AutoZone common stock and/or RSUs having a cumulative fair market value in an amount equal to seven times the value of the cash Annual Retainer payable pursuant to the Director Compensation Program within five years of joining the Board, and to maintain such ownership level thereafter. Exceptions to this requirement may only be made by the Board under compelling mitigating circumstances. Shares, Stock Units and RSUs issued under the AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan, the 2003 Director Compensation Plan, the 2011 Equity Plan, the Amended 2011 Equity Plan and the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan count toward this requirement. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, each director meets or exceeds his or her obligations under the requirement.
OTHER PREDECESSOR PLANS. The AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan was terminated in December 2002 and was replaced by the AutoZone, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2003 Director Compensation Plan (the “2003 Director Compensation Plan”) and the AutoZone, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2003 Director Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Director Stock Option Plan”). The 2003 Director Compensation Plan and the 2003 Director Stock Option Plan were terminated in December 2010 and replaced by the 2011 Equity Plan. The 2011 Equity Plan was terminated in December 2015 and replaced with the Amended 2011 Equity Plan. In December 2020, shareholders approved the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan and no further grants have been made under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan. However, grants made under those plans continue in effect under the terms of the grant made and are included in the aggregate awards outstanding shown above.
20 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
Shareholder Engagement
We value our relationships with our shareholders, and we have a long-standing practice of engaging with our shareholders on matters of Board governance, executive compensation, long-term strategy and corporate social responsibility. We believe our engagement efforts allow us to better understand the priorities, perspectives, and concerns of our shareholders, strengthen our relationships with our shareholders and make more informed decisions for the benefit of our shareholders.
Engagement Team. Our engagement team typically includes one or more of our Executive Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Vice President of Investor Relations. However, depending on the specific topic that our investors may wish to discuss, we may have independent members of the Board, other members of our Executive Committee or internal subject-matter leaders participate.
Engagement Framework | |||||
Pre-Meeting | ● Review updates to investors’ and proxy advisory firms’ governance policies. ● Monitor governance-related trends and regulatory developments. ● Conduct off-cycle engagement to further understand investors’ views and priorities. | ||||
Annual Meeting | ● Conduct in-season outreach to discuss ballot items, as needed. ● Solicit feedback on new or revised governance practices and disclosures. | ||||
Post-Meeting | ● Review annual meeting voting results. ● Discuss feedback from in-season engagement. ● Prioritize potential governance and engagement initiatives for the future. | ||||
Year-Round | ● Discuss with sell-side analysts, institutional investors and pension funds in connection with quarterly earnings releases, investor conferences or one-on-one meetings. | ||||
RESPONSE PLAN | |||||
Review | ● Share feedback and insights, both complimentary and constructive, with management and the relevant Committee or full Board for consideration and discussion. | ||||
Evaluate | ● Evaluate potential changes to existing practices or policies to determine what action plan is most appropriate for AutoZone. ● Where appropriate, collect additional input from senior leadership or independent third parties to better understand issues, risks and opportunities. | ||||
Respond | ● Implement governance changes, disclosure enhancements or other actions, If warranted. ● Discuss responsive actions in subsequent Proxy Statement, ESG Report, or other public communications, with rationale and background. | ||||
2024 Proxy Statement | 21 |
Engagement Framework. Our engagement program has evolved over the years, consistent with the expectations of our investors. Historically, we have taken a more organic approach to shareholder engagement, primarily focused on financial performance and long-term strategy. In recent years, we invited shareholders to discuss governance or ESG topics with us, with the majority of these calls occurring “off-season” or not in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders. Today, we have a more intentional and proactive approach to shareholder engagement, in which we both invite and seek feedback and perspectives on a variety of topics during the year. We believe these various engagement efforts, whether they are part of a broad-based discussion or the result of a targeted outreach effort we have initiated, are invaluable as they allow us to better understand the priorities, perspectives and suggestions or concerns of our shareholders, strengthen our relationships and make more informed decisions for their benefit.
Recent Actions in Response to Shareholder Feedback. Below is a sample of new or revised practices we’ve adopted in direct response to feedback we’ve received from our shareholders.
✓ | Revised our compensation disclosures to better articulate the program design, key performance metrics, shareholder ownership guidelines and how the executive compensation program reflects a pay-for-long-term-performance methodology. |
✓ | Revised certain compensation practices as more fully described in the Compensation, Discussion and Analysis. |
✓ | Included a robust Board skillset matrix to better showcase the complementary set of skills and strengths represented on our Board. |
✓ | Enhanced director biographies to convey each nominee’s individual experiences and why each nominee remains a valuable member of the Board. |
✓ | Added discussion to better explain why we believe our independent audit firm continues to be highly effective in the role despite lengthy tenure. |
✓ | Expanded discussion on our shareholder engagement program to better communicate how we engage with our shareholders and how we’ve responded to shareholder feedback. |
✓ | Amended Committee Charters to formalize Board oversight of corporate responsibility matters. |
✓ | Included EEO-1 Compliant Data in our Corporate Responsibility Report (CRR). |
✓ | Communicated our Net Zero Ambition with short, medium and long-term goals across Scopes 1 and 2. |
✓ | Developed a regular corporate social responsibility reporting cadence with a commitment of publishing our annual CRR by April 15 of each calendar year. |
✓ | Updated our Corporate Governance Principles. |
✓ | Enhanced our governance disclosures, particularly around board succession planning, use of third party firms for Board review and evaluations, our philosophy on the importance of Board tenure and refreshing the Board to ensure sufficient knowledge and experience combined with fresh perspectives, objectivity and independence. |
FY24 Shareholder Engagement—Governance. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, we invited our top shareholders to a general structured discussion on a variety of topics as well as any other feedback or suggestions they might have for the Board to consider.
● | Initial Outreach: We contacted 53 of our top shareholders representing approx. 67% of our shares outstanding. |
● | Meetings Scheduled: In response, 24 shareholders representing approx. 48% of our shares outstanding accepted our invitation to discuss. Our Executive Chairman led the majority of these meetings. |
● | Topics Discussed: Executive compensation program and determinations; CEO Succession; tenure and diversity of the Board; Board succession planning; ESG initiatives; and strategy. |
22 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
FY24 Shareholder Engagement—Compensation. In addition to the engagement efforts listed above, Mr. Mrkonic, the Chair of our Compensation Committee, met with shareholders directly to understand their perspectives on compensation, respond to the decline in support for Say-on-Pay last year and provide additional clarity on the Compensation Committee’s pay philosophy, approach and the corresponding tremendous performance results the Company has delivered for decades. In 2024, Mr. Mrkonic met with 26 of our top shareholder representing approximately 51% of our shares outstanding. A summary of the feedback we received and how we responded is available in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section on page 38.
Procedure for Communication with the Board of Directors
Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board by writing to the Board, to any individual director or to the non-management directors as a group c/o Corporate Secretary, AutoZone, Inc., 123 South Front Street, Dept. 8074, Memphis, Tennessee 38103. The Company’s General Counsel and Secretary will review all such correspondence and will forward correspondence that, in her opinion, deals with the function of the Board or that she otherwise determines requires the attention of any member, group or committee of the Board. Communications addressed to the Board or to the non-management directors as a group, and determined by the Company’s General Counsel and Secretary to merit their attention, will be forwarded to the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and communications addressed to a committee of the Board, and determined by the Company’s General Counsel and Secretary to merit their attention, will be forwarded to the chair of that committee.
Related Party Transactions
Our Board has adopted a Related Person Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) which requires the Audit Committee of the Board to conduct a reasonable prior review of, and approve or ratify, all Related Person Transactions. The Audit Committee considers the relevant facts and circumstances of each transaction, including but not limited to the benefits to the Company; the impact on a director’s independence in the event the Related Person is a director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or executive officer; the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; the terms of the transaction; the terms available to unrelated third parties generally and the existence of any potential conflicts of interest. The Policy further provides that the Audit Committee shall not approve or ratify any such transaction it determines to be inconsistent with the interests of the Company and its shareholders. Related Person Transactions must also comply with the policies and procedures specified in our Code of Conduct and Corporate Governance Principles, as described below.
The Policy also requires disclosure of all Related Person Transactions that are required to be disclosed in AutoZone’s filings with the SEC, in accordance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
A “Related Person Transaction” is defined in the Policy as a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) that occurred since the beginning of the Company’s most recent fiscal year in which the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) was, is or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. “Related Persons” include a director or executive officer of the Company, a nominee to become a director of the Company, any person known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest.
Our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to the Company’s directors, officers and other AutoZoners. The Code of Conduct prohibits directors and executive officers from engaging in activities that create conflicts of interest, taking corporate opportunities for personal use or competing with the Company, among other things. Our Board has also adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Executives (the “Financial Code of Conduct”) that applies to the Company’s officers and employees who hold the position of principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller as well as to the Company’s officers and other AutoZoners who perform similar functions (“Financial Executives”). The Financial Code of Conduct requires the Financial Executives to, among other things, report any actual or apparent
2024 Proxy Statement | 23 |
conflicts of interest between personal or professional relationships involving the Company’s management or any other AutoZoner with a role in financial reporting disclosures or internal controls. Additionally, our Corporate Governance Principles require each director who is faced with an issue that presents, or may give the appearance of presenting, a conflict of interest to disclose that fact to the Chairman of the Board and the Secretary, and to refrain from participating in discussions or votes on such issue unless a majority of the Board determines, after consultation with counsel, that no conflict of interest exists as to such matter.
We have concluded there are no material Related Party Transactions or agreements that were entered into during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2024, and through the date of this proxy statement requiring disclosure under these policies, except as follows: The daughter of Grant McGee, former Senior Vice President, Commercial, has been employed by the Company since 2015 and currently serves as Manager, DIY Promotions and Cost Admin in our Merchandising department. She received aggregate compensation and benefits in fiscal 2024 in excess of $120,000 and at a level consistent with that provided to employees in comparable positions and tenure.
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee of the Board of AutoZone, Inc. has reviewed and discussed AutoZone’s audited financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2024 with AutoZone’s management. In addition, we have discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No.1301, Communications with Audit Committees, as amended and as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the charter of the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee also has received the written disclosures and letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and we have discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee has discussed with AutoZone’s management and the auditing firm such other matters and received such assurances from them as the Committee deemed appropriate.
As a result of our review and discussions, we have recommended to the Board the inclusion of AutoZone’s audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2024 for filing with the SEC.
While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that AutoZone’s financial statements are complete, accurate, or in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); AutoZone’s management and the independent auditor have this responsibility. Nor does the Audit Committee have the duty to assure compliance with laws and regulations and the policies of the Board.
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
D. Bryan Jordan (Chair)
Michael A. George
Linda A. Goodspeed
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
24 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
THE PROPOSALS
PROPOSAL 1: Election of 9 Directors
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL. Elect 9 director nominees. Each director shall serve for a 1-year term, until the next annual meeting of shareholders, or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier death, resignation or removal.
VOTES REQUIRED. The election of directors at this 2024 Annual Meeting is an uncontested election. As such, a director nominee is elected to the Board if the number of votes cast FOR such nominee exceeds the number of votes cast AGAINST such nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote with respect to such matter and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 1. If the number of nominees were to exceed the number of directors to be elected, for example in a contested election, directors would be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting.
IMPACT OF VOTE. Each of these nominees has consented to serve if elected. Should any nominee be unavailable to serve, your proxy will be voted for a substitute nominee recommended by the Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors on the Board. Each of Mr. Guimaraes and Mr. Jordan have decided not to stand for reelection. Accordingly, the size of the Board will be decreased to 9, effective as of the Annual Meeting. We will embark on a formal search process to fill one or both of the director positions.
Pursuant to AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, incumbent directors must agree to tender their resignation if they fail to receive more votes for, than votes against, their reelection. In such event, the Board will act within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote to determine whether to accept the director’s resignation. These procedures are described in more detail in our Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on our website at www.investors.autozone.com. The Board may consider any factors it deems relevant in deciding whether to accept a director’s resignation. If a director’s resignation offer is not accepted by the Board, that director will continue to serve until AutoZone’s next annual meeting of shareholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier death, resignation, or removal.
Any director nominee who is not an incumbent director and who does not receive a majority vote in an uncontested election will not be elected as a director, and a vacancy will be left on the Board. The Board, in its sole discretion, may either fill a vacancy resulting from a director nominee not receiving a majority vote pursuant to the By-Laws or decrease the size of the Board to eliminate the vacancy.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION. Each of the nominees named below, other than Mr. Daniele, was elected as a director at the 2023 annual meeting. Mr. Daniele was appointed to the Board in January 2024 upon assuming the position of President and Chief Executive Officer. All nominees named below currently serve as directors. As part of the Board’s determination to nominate these existing directors for reelection, the Board has determined that each of the directors have valuable experiences, skills and qualifications necessary to carry out their responsibilities effectively.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR each of the director nominees. | ||||||
2024 Proxy Statement | 25 |
Nominees
PHILIP B. DANIELE, III | ||
Age: 55 Director Since: 2024 Independent: No Committees: None | BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Daniele was appointed to the role of President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2024. Prior to being named CEO-Elect in June 2023, Mr. Daniele had served as Executive Vice President – Merchandising, Marketing and Supply Chain from June 2021 to September 2023 and Senior Vice President – Commercial from 2015 to 2021. In addition, Mr. Daniele held the roles of Vice President – Commercial Support from 2013 to 2015, Vice President – Merchandising from 2008 to 2013, and Divisional Vice President – Store Operations from 2005 to 2008. Prior to 2005, Mr. Daniele held several other key management positions with the Company. | KEY SKILLS: ● CEO ● Retail ● Operations |
QUALIFICATIONS: ● 31 years of AutoZone tenure with experience leading multiple functional areas. ● Held nearly every role in store operations. ● Approximately 40 years of experience in the aftermarket automotive industry. | ||
MICHAEL A. GEORGE | ||
Age: 63 Director Since: 2022 Independent: Yes Committees: ● Audit | BIOGRAPHY: Mr. George served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Qurate Retail, Inc. from March 2018 to September 2021, the parent company of QVC, and as Chief Executive Officer of QVC from 2005 through July 2021. He previously held various positions with Dell, Inc. from 2001 to 2005, most notably as the Chief Marketing Officer and General Manager of its U.S. consumer business. Prior to that, Mr. George was a senior partner at McKinsey & Company and led the firm’s North American Retail Industry Group. | KEY SKILLS: ● CEO ● Retail ● Marketing |
QUALIFICATIONS: ● Significant experience in the retail industry due to extensive career as Chief Executive Officer of QVC/Qurate and serving as leader of McKinsey’s North American Retail Industry Group. ● Brings fresh perspective on issues of marketing, customer experience and e-Commerce, given the unique nature of QVC’s video-driven retail business. ● Having extensive experience as CEO and a public company director enables him to be an effective and informed contributor to the Board. PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (last five years): ● Ralph Lauren Corp. (2018 – present) ● Qurate Retail, Inc. (2011 – 2021) ● Brinker International, Inc. (2013 – 2019) | ||
26 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
LINDA A. GOODSPEED | ||
Age: 62 Director Since: 2013 Independent: Yes Committees: ● Audit ● Compensation | BIOGRAPHY: Ms. Goodspeed served as the Chief Operating Officer and a Managing Partner at WealthStrategies Financial Advisors from 2007 until her retirement in 2017. She had served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of ServiceMaster from 2011 to 2014. From 2008 to September 2011, Ms. Goodspeed served as Vice President, Information Systems and Chief Information Officer for Nissan North America, Inc., a subsidiary of Nissan Motor Company, a global manufacturer of vehicles. From 2001 to 2008, Ms. Goodspeed served as Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Lennox International, Inc., a global manufacturer of air conditioning, heating and commercial refrigeration equipment. | KEY SKILLS: ● Information Technology ● Automotive ● Public Board Experience |
QUALIFICATIONS: ● Deep experience with respect to information technology (IT) matters gained from leading complex IT organizations while serving as Chief Information Officer. ● Knowledge of automotive industry lends valuable insights into risks and opportunities affecting automotive aftermarket industry. ● Experience serving on different public company boards enables her to contribute and serve the Board in a highly effectively manner. | ||
PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (last five years): ● American Electric Power Co., Inc. (2006 – 2024) ● Darling Ingredients Inc. (2017 – present) ● Williams Industrial Services Group Inc. (2021 – 2023) ● Global Power Equipment Group (2016 – 2018) |
EARL G. GRAVES, JR. | ||
Age: 62 Director Since: 2002 Independent: Yes (Lead Independent Director) Committees: ● Nominating & Corp Gov (Chair) | BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Graves has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Black Enterprise, the premier business, investing and wealth-building resource for African Americans providing valuable business information across different content channels. He has served in this role since January 2006 and served as its President and Chief Operating Officer from 1998 to 2006. Mr. Graves has been employed by the same company in various capacities since 1988. QUALIFICATIONS: ● Significant expertise in marketing, customer insights and brand awareness. ● Deep knowledge of human capital management matters gained from extensive career leading Black Enterprise. ● Vast experience in overseeing and advising on matters of digital strategy. | KEY SKILLS ● CEO ● Marketing ● Human Capital Management |
2024 Proxy Statement | 27 |
BRIAN P. HANNASCH | ||
Age: 58 Director Since: 2022 Independent: Yes Committees: ● Compensation | BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Hannasch served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Alimentation Couche-Tard, which operates Circle K, a global fuel and convenience retailer, from September 2014 to September 2024. Today, Mr. Hannasch continues as Special Advisor to his successor. Mr. Hannasch joined Couche-Tard in 2001 and served as Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President of U.S. Operations and Senior Vice President of Western North America prior to serving as CEO. QUALIFICATIONS: ● Extensive knowledge of retail operations gained from serving in operational leadership roles of increasing responsibility. ● 10 years of experience serving as CEO of a public, global, retail enterprise allowing him to offer directly comparable experiences, learnings and insights relating to AutoZone’s business as well as matters of corporate governance. ● Led the expansion of Couche-Tard brands into numerous international markets including Europe and Asia. PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (last five years): ● Alimentation Couche-Tard (2014 – present) | KEY SKILLS: ● CEO ● Operations ● International |
GALE V. KING | ||
Age: 68 Director Since: 2018 Independent: Yes Committees: ● Compensation | BIOGRAPHY: Ms. King served as the Executive Vice President—Chief Administrative Officer of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, a leading financial services company, from 2012 through her retirement in July 2021. She previously served as their Executive Vice President—Chief Human Resources Officer from 2009 to 2012. QUALIFICATIONS: ● Extensive experience in human resources providing critical insights into recruitment, retention, training and development and other issues of human capital management. ● Served as chair of Board’s ad hoc CEO succession planning committee culminating in the June 2023 announcement of Mr. Daniele as CEO-Elect. ● Experience serving on different public company boards enables her to contribute and serve the Board in a highly effective manner. PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (last five years): ● J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (2020 – 2023) ● Unum Group (2022 – present) | KEY SKILLS: ● Human Resources ● Public Directorship |
28 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
GEORGE R. MRKONIC, JR. | ||
Age: 72 Director Since: 2006 Independent: Yes Committees: ● Audit ● Compensation (Chair) | BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Mrkonic is the retired non-Executive Chairman of Maru Group, a London, UK based research, insight and advisory services firm. Previously, he was the Non-Executive Chairman of Paperchase Products Limited, London, UK, a retailer of cards, stationery, wraps and gifts in the UK, Europe and the Middle East since 2005, and had been a director since 1999. Prior to that, he was President of Borders Group, Inc. from 1994 to 1997 and Vice Chairman from 1994 to 2002. QUALIFICATIONS: ● Vast retail experience gained from serving as a senior executive and board member at several retail companies. ● Extensive knowledge and understanding of corporate strategy, finance, governance and compensation programs. ● Served on multiple public company boards allowing for relevant and informed insights and learnings. PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (last five years): ● Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (2015 – present) ● Brinker International, Inc. (2003 – 2021) | KEY SKILLS: ● Public Directorship ● Strategy / Bus Development ● Retail |
WILLIAM C. RHODES, III | ||
Age: 59 Director Since: 2005 Independent: No Committees: None | BIOGRAPHY: Mr. Rhodes serves as Executive Chairman of the Board. Prior to the CEO succession in January 2024, Mr. Rhodes served as AutoZone’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and a director since 2005 and was named Chairman in 2007. Previously, he served in various capacities of increasing responsibility within the Company since 1994. Prior to 1994, Mr. Rhodes was a manager with Ernst & Young LLP. QUALIFICATIONS: ● Nearly 30 years of AutoZone tenure, including nearly 19 years as President and Chief Executive Officer. ● Extensive knowledge and understanding of the automotive aftermarket industry domestically and internationally. ● Expertise of the retail industry gained from AutoZone tenure, prior retail board experience and leadership experience at retail industry trade group. ● Strong financial expertise to drive long-term profitable growth. PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (last five years): ● Regions Financial Corp. (2024 – present) ● Dollar General Corp. (2009 – 2023) | KEY SKILLS: ● CEO ● Retail ● Strategy / Bus Development ● Finance |
2024 Proxy Statement | 29 |
JILL A. SOLTAU | ||
Age: 57 Director Since: 2018 Independent: Yes Committees: ● Nominating & Corp Gov | BIOGRAPHY: Ms. Soltau served as the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of the J.C. Penney Company, Inc., from October 2018 to December 2020. She previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of JoAnn Stores Inc. from February 2015 to October 2018. Prior to joining JoAnn, Ms. Soltau served as President of Shopko Stores Operating Co. LLC and has held senior level positions in national and regional retailers, including Kohl’s and former Saks Inc. subsidiaries. QUALIFICATIONS: ● Significant experience serving as Chief Executive Officer in public and private retailers with deep knowledge of retail operations, strategic planning and business development ● Extensive expertise and modern approach in the retail industry from a career serving in leadership roles of increasing responsibility in customer facing functions of merchandising, marketing and operations ● Serves on multiple public company boards providing valuable and relevant insights and perspectives. PUBLIC DIRECTORSHIPS (last five years): ● Southwest Airlines Co. (2023 – November 2024) ● Kirkland’s Inc. (2022 – present) ● J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (2018 – 2020) | KEY SKILLS: ● CEO ● Retail ● Strategy / Bus Development ● Merchandising |
30 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL. Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) as AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025.
VOTES REQUIRED. EY will be ratified as AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm if the number of votes cast FOR the proposal exceeds the number of votes cast AGAINST. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote with respect to this matter and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 2.
IMPACT OF VOTE. The Audit Committee is not bound by a vote either for or against the firm but will consider the votes cast by shareholders in selecting our independent registered public accounting firm in the future.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION. As part of its responsibility to evaluate and appoint the independent auditor each year, the Audit Committee has selected EY as our independent registered public accounting firm for the upcoming fiscal year. The Audit Committee considered a number of factors prior to making the determination to re-engage EY, including the nature and quality of their performance, communications, expertise, objectivity, professional judgement and tenure. As discussed below, the Audit Committee believes there are numerous benefits associated with a long-tenured relationship. The Audit Committee also considered that shareholders voted in favor of Ernst & Young with over 92% of the votes cast at last year’s annual meeting. Due to these factors, among others, the Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young to be AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2025 fiscal year.
Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to answer any appropriate questions.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as AutoZone’s independent registered public accounting firm. | ||||||
Benefits of a long-tenured auditor
EY has served as our independent auditor for over thirty-five years. Before determining to engage them again for the upcoming fiscal year, the Audit Committee considered how auditor tenure might impact the quality and effectiveness of the independent audit and determined that a number of benefits exist:
● | EY has developed a deep understanding of AutoZone, its business, the industry in which it operates, its accounting policies and practices and its internal controls over financial reporting; |
● | Efficiencies have been gained in the audit process, resulting in an efficient fee structure that is competitive with our peer companies, while continuing to provide high quality service; and |
● | Appointing a new audit firm would require a significant amount of management’s time for effective onboarding and transitioning. |
2024 Proxy Statement | 31 |
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by EY during the past two fiscal years for the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements, the review of our quarterly interim consolidated financial statements, and audit-related, tax, and all other services performed, are set forth in the table below. Amounts reported for FY24 include estimates to be billed for services rendered.
| 2024 |
| 2023 | |||
Audit Fees | $ | 3,107,341 | $ | 2,848,590 | ||
Audit-Related Fees | $ | 45,000 | $ | 35,000 | ||
Tax Fees(1) | $ | 225,950 | $ | 80,886 | ||
All Other Fees | $ | — | $ | — |
(1) | Relates to state, local and international tax services, including tax compliance and tax planning. |
Audit Committee Pre-Approval
The Audit Committee pre-approves all services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm under the terms contained in the Audit Committee charter, a copy of which can be obtained at our website at investors.autozone.com. The Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the services provided by EY during the 2024 and 2023 fiscal years. The Audit Committee considers the services listed above to be compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence.
32 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL 3: Advisory Vote on the Compensation of Named Executive Officers
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL. In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are asking shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution on the compensation of our Principal Executive Officer, our Principal Financial Officer and our other three most highly paid executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to AutoZone’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”
VOTES REQUIRED. This matter will be approved if the number of votes cast FOR the proposal exceeds the number of votes cast AGAINST the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote with respect to this proposal and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 3.
IMPACT OF VOTE. This advisory vote, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to endorse or express disapproval of our executive pay program. Because the vote on this proposal is advisory in nature, it is not binding on AutoZone, the Board or the Compensation Committee. The vote on this proposal will, therefore, not affect any compensation already paid or awarded to any Named Executive Officer nor will it overrule any decisions made by the Board or the Compensation Committee. Because we highly value the opinions of our shareholders, however, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the results of this advisory vote when making future executive compensation decisions.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION. The Board believes that AutoZone’s executive compensation program, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, is effective in achieving the Company’s goals of driving superior performance, retention and shareholder value. Our Board and Compensation Committee believe that there should be a strong relationship between pay and performance, and our executive compensation program reflects this belief. We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, as well as the compensation tables and narrative, set forth herein, which provide detailed information on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices and the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. | ||||||
2024 Proxy Statement | 33 |
PROPOSAL 4: Advisory Vote on Reducing the Ownership Threshold to Call Special Meeting
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL. Under the By-Laws, a special meeting of shareholders may be called by the Chairman of the Board or President, by the majority of the Board or by holders of a majority of outstanding shares (the “Special Meeting Right”). We are asking shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution on an amendment of our governing documents to reduce the ownership threshold necessary to call a special meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the AutoZone Board of Directors is hereby requested to amend the appropriate governing documents of the Company to give shareholders owning a combined 25% of the Company’s outstanding shares the ability to call a special meeting of stockholders.”
VOTES REQUIRED. This matter will be approved if the number of votes cast FOR the proposal exceeds the number of votes cast AGAINST. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote with respect to this proposal and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 4.
IMPACT OF VOTE. This advisory vote gives our shareholders the opportunity to consider an alternative proposal from the majority requirement in our existing By-Laws and from the lower threshold set forth in the shareholder proposal (Proposal 5). Because the vote on this proposal is advisory in nature, it is not binding on AutoZone or the Board. However, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the results of this advisory vote and the advisory vote set forth in Proposal 5 in determining next steps. If this Proposal 4 is approved and Proposal 5 is not approved by shareholders, the Board intends to adopt an amendment to the By-Laws that would lower the required threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting (the “Special Meeting Right”) to 25%.
If both the Company’s Proposal (this Proposal 4) and the Shareholder Proposal (Proposal 5) regarding special meeting rights are approved, the Board will consider the voting results of both proposals, the difference in support for each proposal and the feedback from our shareholders received through engagement efforts. Based on the totality of such information, the Board will take such actions as it deems to be in the best interest of all shareholders.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION. The Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee have reviewed the Special Meeting Right currently set forth in the By-Laws and considered a multitude of factors, including the existing governance profile of the Company, prevailing practices among other companies of a comparable size and governance profile as the Company and feedback from shareholders during engagement meetings. As a result of this review, the Board has determined that the Company and its shareholders would be best served by a Special Meeting Right with a lower threshold of 25%. This would allow shareholders to call for special meetings to consider matters that have significant, but less than majority, support.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote FOR the advisory vote on reducing the ownership threshold to call special meetings to 25% | ||||||
34 | 2024 Proxy Statement |
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL. We have received notice of the intention of John Chevedden to present the following proposal at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with federal securities regulations, the text of the shareholder proposal and supporting statement appears below exactly as received, other than minor formatting changes. The contents of the proposal and supporting statement are the sole responsibility of John Chevedden, and AutoZone is not responsible for the content of the proposal and supporting statement or any inaccuracies they may contain. Mr. Chevedden has provided documentation showing that he has continuously owned no fewer than 5 shares with a market value of $14,951.75 (based upon closing stock price on the date of submission) since at least May 1, 2021. We will promptly provide the proponent’s address upon a shareholder’s request directed to our Corporate Secretary.
VOTES REQUIRED. This matter will be approved if the number of votes cast FOR the proposal exceeds the number of votes cast AGAINST. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast or shares entitled to vote with respect to this proposal and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 5.
IMPACT OF VOTE. Because the vote on this proposal is advisory in nature, it is not binding on AutoZone or the Board. However, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the results of this advisory vote and Proposal 4 in determining next steps.
If both the Company’s Proposal (Proposal 4) and this Shareholder Proposal (Proposal 5) regarding special meeting rights are approved, the Board will consider the voting results of both proposals, the difference in support for each proposal and the feedback from our shareholders received through engagement efforts. Based on the totality of such information, the Board will take such actions as it deems to be in the best interest of all shareholders.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION. As explained below, the Company and the Board do not support the adoption of this proposal and encourage shareholders to review the Company’s response following the proponent’s statement below.