N-CSR 1 form.htm Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust

                                United States
                      Securities and Exchange Commission
                            Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  Form N-CSR
  Certified Shareholder Report of Registered Management Investment Companies




                                   811-6165

                     (Investment Company Act File Number)


                 Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust
       ---------------------------------------------------------------

              (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)



                          Federated Investors Funds
                             5800 Corporate Drive
                     Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15237-7000


                                (412) 288-1900
                       (Registrant's Telephone Number)


                          John W. McGonigle, Esquire
                          Federated Investors Tower
                             1001 Liberty Avenue
                     Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-3779
                   (Name and Address of Agent for Service)
              (Notices should be sent to the Agent for Service)






                       Date of Fiscal Year End: 8/31/05


             Date of Reporting Period: Fiscal year ended 8/31/05







Item 1.     Reports to Stockholders

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated California Municipal Income Fund

A Portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

August 31, 2005

Class A Shares
Class B Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
BOARD REVIEW OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights - Class A Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

   
2001

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$10.94 $10.70 $11.00 $11.08 $10.65
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 1 0.53
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swap contracts

0.16


0.24


(0.30
)

(0.08
) 1

0.43

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.68


0.76


0.22


0.44


0.96

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.52
)

(0.52
)

(0.52
)

(0.52
)

(0.53
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$11.10


$10.94


$10.70


$11.00


$11.08

Total Return 2

6.32
%

7.26
%

1.98
%

4.16
%

9.27
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.50
%

0.50
%

0.50
%

0.50
%

0.50
%
Net investment income

4.68
%

4.81
%

4.72
%

4.81
% 1

4.91
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.90
%

0.85
%

0.80
%

0.85
%

0.91
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$44,159


$34,269


$36,607


$39,872


$30,079

Portfolio turnover

18
%

13
%

24
%

21
%

30
%

1 Effective September 1, 2001, the Fund adopted the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began accreting discount on debt securities. For the year ended August 31, 2002, this change had no effect on the net investment income per share, net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share, or the ratio of net investment income to average net assets. Per share, ratios and supplemental data for the periods prior to September 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights - Class B Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

   
2001

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$10.94 $10.70 $11.00 $11.08 $10.65
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.43 0.44 0.44 0.44 1 0.45
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swap contracts

0.16


0.24


(0.30
)

(0.08
) 1

0.43

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.59


0.68


0.14


0.36


0.88

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.43
)

(0.44
)

(0.44
)

(0.44
)

(0.45
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$11.10


$10.94


$10.70


$11.00


$11.08

Total Return 2

5.52
%

6.46
%

1.22
%

3.39
%

8.46
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

1.25
%

1.25
%

1.25
%

1.25
%

1.25
%
Net investment income

3.93
%

4.06
%

3.97
%

4.05
% 1

4.16
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.65
%

0.60
%

0.55
%

0.60
%

0.66
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$37,464


$43,773


$50,921


$49,363


$43,675

Portfolio turnover

18
%

13
%

24
%

21
%

30
%

1 Effective September 1, 2001, the Fund adopted the provisions of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began accreting discount on debt securities. For the year ended August 31, 2002, this change had no effect on the net investment income per share, net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share, or the ratio of net investment income to average net assets. Per share, ratios and supplemental data for the periods prior to September 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2005.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


   
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/2005

   
Ending
Account Value
8/31/2005

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:






Class A Shares

$1,000

$1,032.60

$2.56
Class B Shares

$1,000

$1,028.70

$6.39
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Class A Shares

$1,000

$1,022.68

$2.55
Class B Shares

$1,000

$1,018.90

$6.36

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratios, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized expense ratios are as follows:

Class A Shares
   
0.50%
Class B Shares
   
1.25%

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

The fund's total return, based on net asset value, for the 12-month reporting period was 6.32% for Class A Shares and 5.52% for Class B Shares. The total return of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 1 the fund's benchmark index during the 12-month reporting period, was 5.31% for the 12-month reporting period. The fund's total return reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs and other expenses which were not reflected in the total return of the LBMB.

The fund's investment strategy focused on: (a) the effective duration of the portfolio (which indicates the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates); (b) the selection of securities with different maturities (expressed by a yield curve showing the relative yield of similar securities with different maturities); (c) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as sectors); and (d) the credit quality of portfolio securities. 2 These were the most significant factors affecting the fund's performance relative to the LBMB.

The following discussion will focus on the performance of the fund's Class A Shares. The 6.32% total return of the Class A Shares for the reporting period consisted of 4.86% of tax-exempt dividends and 1.46% of price appreciation in the net asset value of the shares. 3

1 The LBMB is the broad-based securities market index for the fund. The LBMB is a broad market performance benchmark for the tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBMB, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of Baa, have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The LBMB includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Effective September 1, 2005, the fund elected to change its benchmark index from the LBMB to the Lehman Brothers California Municipal Bond Index (LBCAMB). The LBCAMB is more representative of the securities typically held by the Fund. The LBCAMB is a broad-based market performance benchmark. The total return of the LBCAMB was 6.24% for the 12-month reporting period. To be included in the LBCAMB, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of Baa3, have been issued as part of a deal of at least $75 million, have an amount outstanding of at least $7 million, have a maturity of one year or greater and have been issued after December 31, 1990. Indexes are unmanaged, and it is not possible to invest directly in an index.

2 Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices.

3 Income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

MARKET OVERVIEW

The reporting period was characterized by a flattening yield curve, tightening credit spreads and a large supply of new tax-exempt municipal bonds.

During the reporting period, the Federal Reserve Board (the "Fed") continued tightening interest rates, raising the Federal Funds Target Rate from 1.50% in August, 2004 to 3.50% in August, 2005. Consequently, interest rates throughout the short end of the yield curve rose as well. According to Municipal Market Data (MMD), yields on AAA-rated general obligation tax-exempt municipal bonds rose by 133 basis points for 1 year-maturity bonds, and tapered to a 4 basis point increase for 9-year maturity bonds.

During the reporting period, long-term interest rates fell by as much as 53 basis points according to MMD. A variety of factors appeared to come together to cause long-term interest rates to fall in the face of the Fed's tightening of interest rates. High oil prices and signs of a slowing economy appeared to dampen inflation fears. At the same time, continued international turmoil and excess foreign capital kept the demand high for U.S. Treasury securities. The net effect was that the yield spread between 1- and 30-year AAA-rated general obligation tax-exempt bonds fell from 322 basis points to 141 basis points, and the tax-exempt municipal yield curve flattened, during the reporting period (that is, while securities provided higher incremental income or yield as maturities became longer, the amount of the increase in incremental income was less or flattened).

Credit spreads (the yield difference between AAA-rated tax-exempt municipal bonds and bonds of lower credit quality and similar maturity) tightened significantly during the reporting period. According to Lehman Brothers, Inc., the credit spread between their high yield municipal index, the Lehman Brothers Non-Investment Grade Municipal Bond Index, 4 and the LBMB tightened from 313 basis points to 222 basis points. 5

4 The Lehman Brothers Non-Investment Grade Municipal Bond Index (LBNIGMBI) is a broad market performance benchmark for the high-yield, tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBNIGMBI, bonds must be non-rated or be rated Ba1 or below, have been issued as part of a transaction of at least $20 million, have an outstanding part value of at least $3 million, and have a remaining maturity of at least 1 year.

5 Investment grade securities are securities that are rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Non-investment grade (or high yield) securities are securities that are not rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.

The 12-month reporting period also saw a large supply of new tax-exempt municipal bonds. During calendar year 2004, issuance of new tax-exempt municipal bonds was the second-highest ever. This followed the record new issuance of tax-exempt municipal bonds in 2003. Issuance from January 1, 2005 through July 31, 2005 appeared to keep pace with the previous two calendar years.

During the reporting period, the California tax-exempt municipal market was dominated by the same factors as the national market. The yield curve flattened, spreads tightened and supply remained high. According to The Bond Buyer, issuance of California tax-exempt municipal bonds in calendar year 2004 was the second-highest on record, and issuance for 2005 (through July 31, 2005) was on a pace to be the third-highest.

During the reporting period, California's credit profile continued to improve. In July, 2005, ratings on the state's general obligation bonds were upgraded by Moody's Investor's Service, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) from A3 to A2 with a positive outlook, and Fitch Ratings, an NRSRO, from A- to A. Standard & Poor's, an NRSRO, rating remained at A. 6

DURATION 7 AND YIELD CURVE/MATURITY

As determined at the end of the reporting period, the fund's dollar-weighted average duration was 4.9 years. Duration management is a significant component of the fund's investment strategy. The fund's duration was maintained short of the duration of the LBMB during the reporting period. The fund's duration negatively impacted the fund's performance relative to the LBMB. The fund's use of Treasury futures contracts to adjust portfolio duration also negatively impacted the fund's performance. These negative impacts on the fund's performance resulted from the rally in longer-maturity bonds, which generally performed better than shorter-maturity bonds during the reporting period.

6 Credit ratings pertain only to the securities in the portfolio and do not protect fund shares against market risk.

7 Duration is a measure of a security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations.

SECTOR

The fund's best performing sectors were lower-quality sectors, including tobacco, lifecare and special tax-exempt municipal bonds. These lower-quality sectors benefited from higher yields, improving credit quality and tightening credit spreads. Lagging sectors for the fund included insured, refunded and water and sewer tax-exempt municipal bonds, which were higher-quality sectors that did not perform as well as the lower quality sectors. Due to the fund's over-weight position in the better performing sectors, sector allocation positively impacted the fund's performance relative to the LBMB.

CREDIT QUALITY

The fund maintained an allocation to low investment grade (BBB-rated and unrated securities of comparable quality) tax-exempt municipal bonds and non-investment grade (securities rated below BBB or unrated securities of comparable quality) tax-exempt municipal bonds. This allocation benefited the fund's performance as tightening credit spreads caused them to outperform higher-quality, investment-grade, tax-exempt municipal bonds. The fund's performance also benefited from upgrades to California's general obligation bond rating by two of the three major ratings agencies (or NRSRO's) as the upgraded ratings caused appreciation in the price of these securities.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT - CLASS A SHARES

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 1 in Federated California Municipal Income Fund (Class A Shares) (the "Fund") from August 31, 1995 to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers California Municipal Bond Index (LBCAMB), 2,3 the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB) 2,3 and the Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Average (LCAMDFA). 2

Average Annual Total Return 4 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   

1 Year

1.49%
5 Years

4.80%
10 Years

5.54%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum sales charge of 4.50%.

1 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting the maximum sales charge of 4.50% ($10,000 investment minus $450 sales charge = $9,550). The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBCAMB, LBMB and LCAMDFA have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the indexes and the average. The indexes are unmanaged, and, unlike the Fund, are not affected by cashflows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or average.

2 The LBCAMB is an unmanaged index that includes issues in the state of California, which have a minimum credit rating of Baa3, have been issued as part of a deal of at least $75 million, have an amount outstanding of at least $7 million, have a maturity of one year or greater and have been issued after December 31, 1990. The LBMB is an unmanaged index compromising bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The index includes both zero coupons bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. The LBCAMB and LBMB are not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance. The LCAMDFA represents the average of the total returns reported by all of the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling in the category indicated, and is not adjusted to reflect any sales charges. However, these total returns are reported net of expenses or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a fund's performance.

3 The Fund's investment adviser has elected to change the Fund's benchmark index from the LBMB to the LBCAMB. The LBCAMB is more representative of the securities typically held by the Fund. The LBCAMB's date of inception was September 1, 1996.

4 Total return quoted reflects all applicable sales charges.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT - CLASS B SHARES

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 1 in Federated California Municipal Income Fund (Class B Shares) (the "Fund") from December 1, 1997 (start of performance) to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers California Municipal Bond Index (LBCAMB), 2,3 the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB) 2,3 and the Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Average (LCAMDFA). 2

Average Annual Total Return 4 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   

1 Year

0.02%
5 Years

4.65%
Start of Performance (12/1/1997)

4.43%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum contingent deferred sales charge of 5.50% as applicable.

1 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund. The maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 5.50% on any redemption less than one year from the purchase date. The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBCAMB, LBMB and LCAMDFA have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the indexes and the average. The indexes and average are unmanaged, and, unlike the Fund, are not affected by cashflows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or average.

2 The LBCAMB is an unmanaged index that includes issues in the state of California, which have a minimum credit rating of Baa3, have been issued as part of a deal of at least $75 million, have an amount outstanding of at least $7 million, have a maturity of one year or greater and have been issued after December 31, 1990. The LBMB is an unmanaged index compromising bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The index includes both zero coupons bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. The LBCAMB and LBMB are not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance. The LCAMDFA represents the average of the total returns reported by all of the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling in the category indicated, and is not adjusted to reflect any sales charges. However, these total returns are reported net of expenses or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a fund's performance.

3 The Fund's investment adviser has elected to change the Fund's benchmark index from the LBMB to the LBCAMB. The LBCAMB is more representative of the securities typically held by the Fund. The LBCAMB's date of inception was September 1, 1996.

4 Total return quoted reflects all applicable contingent deferred sales charges.

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400.

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At August 31, 2005, the Fund's credit-quality ratings composition 1 was as follows:

S&P Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

Moody's Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

AAA
   
34.5%
    Aaa
   
34.7%
AA

3.7%
Aa

2.4%
A

20.9%
A

20.5%
BBB

15.5%
Baa

7.2%
BB

0.9%
Ba

0.0%
B

0.0%
Caa1

0.9%
Not Rated by S&P

24.5%
Not Rated by Moody's

34.3%
   TOTAL

100.0%
   TOTAL

100.0%

1 These tables depict the long-term, credit-quality ratings assigned to the Fund's portfolio holdings by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), each of which is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). These credit-quality ratings are shown without regard to gradations within a given rating category. For example, securities rated "A-" have been included in the "A" rated category. Rated securities that have been prerefunded, but not rated again by the NRSRO, also have been included in the "Not rated by..." category.

Rated securities include a security with an obligor and/or credit enhancer that has received a rating from an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt obligations that is comparable in priority and security with the security held by the Fund. Credit-quality ratings are an assessment of the risk that a security will default in payment and do not address other risks presented by the security. Please see the descriptions of credit-quality ratings in the Fund's Statement of Additional Information.

Holdings that are rated only by a different NRSRO than the one identified have been included in the "Not rated by..." category. Of the portfolio's total investments, 11.8% do not have long-term ratings by either of these NRSROs.

2 Percentages are based on total investments, which may differ from the Fund's total net assets used in computing the percentages in the Portfolio of Investments which follows.

Portfolio of Investments

August 31, 2005

Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--99.0%   
California--96.6%
$ 500,000 ABAG Finance Authority for Non-Profit Corporations, Revenue Bonds, 6.125% (Southern California Presbyterian Homes)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.25%), 11/15/2032
BBB+/NR $ 546,340
500,000 Anaheim, CA Public Financing Authority, Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 1997C), 6.00% (Anaheim Public Improvements Project)/(FSA INS), 9/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 595,960
500,000 Bell Community Redevelopment Agency, CA, Refunding Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Radian Asset Assurance INS), 10/1/2023
AA/NR 544,145
605,000 Blythe, CA Financing Authority, Sewer Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 5.75%, 4/1/2028
NR 620,488
500,000 California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.75% (Fresno Pacific University), 3/1/2019
NR/Baa3 551,395
1,000,000 California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (Pepperdine University)/(United States Treasury PRF 8/1/2009 @100), 8/1/2032
NR/A1 1,090,740
750,000 California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (California College of the Arts), 6/1/2035
BBB-/Baa3 761,220
305,000 California Educational Facilities Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 5.55% (AMBAC INS), 4/1/2028
AAA/NR 320,811
425,000 California Educational Facilities Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.40% (Cal Loan Program)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 3/1/2021
NR/Aaa 446,888
425,000 California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Health Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2004I), 4.95% TOBs (Catholic Healthcare West), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2014
A-/A3 452,009
1,000,000 California Health Facilities Financing Authority, INS Health Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1997), 5.50% (Valley Care Hospital Corp.)/(California Mortgage Insurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.737%), 5/1/2020
A/NR 1,042,200
1,000,000 California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 5.40% (Northern California Presbyterian Homes, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.417%), 7/1/2028
BBB+/NR 1,025,260
1,500,000 California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1999A), 6.125% (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center)/(United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2009 @101), 12/1/2030
NR/A3 1,695,525
700,000 2 California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds (1996 Series A), 6.00% (Catholic Healthcare West)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.15%), 7/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 731,703
500,000 California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 5.75% (Scripps Research Institute)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 7/1/2030
NR/Aa3 533,480
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
California--continued
$ 1,000,000 California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank, Revenue Bonds (Series 2001B), 5.50% (Kaiser Permanente), 8/1/2031
A+/A2 $ 1,069,380
1,000,000 California PCFA, Refunding Revenue Bonds (1996 Series A), 5.35% (Pacific Gas & Electric Co.)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 12/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 1,090,210
900,000 California PCFA, Sewer & Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.818%), 12/1/2030
A+/A1 932,724
1,000,000 California PCFA, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-2), 5.40% (Waste Management, Inc.), 4/1/2025
BBB/NR 1,047,600
750,000 California PCFA, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, 5.125% TOBs (Waste Management, Inc.), Mandatory Tender 5/1/2014
BBB/NR 794,670
700,000 California PCFA, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, 6.875% (Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.95%), 11/1/2027
BB-/Caa1 710,500
1,000,000 California PCFA, Solid Waste Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1999A), 5.125% (West County Resource Recovery, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank - California LOC)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.323%), 1/1/2014
NR 1,016,760
70,000 California Rural Home Mortgage Finance Authority, SFM Revenue Bonds, (Series 1998 B-4), 6.35% (GNMA Collateralized Home Mortgage Program COL), 12/1/2029
AAA/NR 71,481
500,000 California State Department of Water Resources Power Supply Program, Power Supply Revenue Bonds (INS Series), 5.375% (AMBAC INS), 5/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 554,375
1,500,000 California State Department of Water Resources Power Supply Program, Power Supply Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.375% (Original Issue Yield: 5.48%), 5/1/2022
BBB+/A2 1,641,690
1,000,000 California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (California State Department of Corrections), 1/1/2013
A-/A3 1,095,010
870,000 California State, UT GO Bonds, 5.25% (Original Issue Yield: 5.375%), 12/1/2027
A/A2 933,545
1,000,000 California State, UT GO Bonds, 5.125% (Original Issue Yield: 5.40%), 6/1/2025
A/A2 1,053,280
20,000 California State, UT GO Bonds, 5.75% (Original Issue Yield: 6.25%), 3/1/2019
A/A2 20,319
1,000,000 California State, Various Purpose UT GO Bonds, 5.125% (Original Issue Yield: 5.16%), 4/1/2023
A/A2 1,079,130
1,000,000 California State, Various Purpose UT GO Bonds, 5.25%, 11/1/2021
A/A2 1,102,780
400,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, COPs, 5.25% (St. Joseph Health System Group, CA)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.47%), 7/1/2021
AA-/Aa3 418,496
1,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, COPs, 5.50% (Sutter Health)/(FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.77%), 8/15/2018
AAA/Aaa 1,092,260
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
California--continued
$ 500,000 3 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2001), 6.75% (Saint Mark's School), 6/1/2028
NR $ 533,595
400,000 3 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 6.75% (Prospect Sierra School)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.85%), 9/1/2032
NR 430,108
400,000 3,4 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 4.875% (Thomas Jefferson School of Law)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.93%), 10/1/2035
BBB-/NR 402,996
1,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.25% (Daughters of Charity Health System), 7/1/2035
BBB+/NR 1,047,500
500,000 3 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.50% (Turningpoint School), 11/1/2031
NR 526,545
1,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Los Angeles Orthopedic Hospital Foundation)/(AMBAC INS), 6/1/2030
AAA/Aaa 1,049,460
500,000 Capistrano Unified School District, CA Community Facilities District No. 90-2, Special Tax Bonds (Series 2003), 5.875% (Talega Ranch), 9/1/2023
NR 538,630
450,000 Central Unified School District, CA, UT GO Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.50% (FGIC INS), 7/1/2022
AAA/Aaa 510,354
455,000 Central Unified School District, CA, UT GO Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.50% (FGIC INS), 7/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 516,025
250,000 Chula Vista, CA Community Facilities District No. 06-1, Special Tax Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 6.15% (Eastlake-Woods, Vistas & Land Swap), 9/1/2026
NR 268,637
1,000,000 Daly City, CA HDFA, Mobile Home Park Senior Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A0), 5.85% (Franciscan Acquisition Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.95%), 12/15/2032
A-/NR 1,052,500
1,000,000 El Centro, CA Financing Authority, INS Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2001), 5.25% (El Centro Regional Medical Center)/(California Mortgage Insurance LOC)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.32%), 3/1/2018
A/NR 1,056,340
740,000 El Monte, CA Public Financing Authority, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 5.75% (El Monte, CA Community Redevelopment Agency), 6/1/2028
NR 762,674
700,000 Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, (Series 1995A) Senior Lien Toll Road Revenue Bonds, 6.50% (United States Treasury PRF 1/1/2007 @100)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.78%), 1/1/2032
AAA/Aaa 734,335
1,000,000 Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, Toll Road Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Original Issue Yield: 5.774%), 1/15/2040
BBB-/Baa3 1,031,360
1,000,000 Fremont, CA Union High School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (FGIC INS), 9/1/2022
AAA/Aaa 1,090,800
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
California--continued
$ 2,000,000 Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A-1), 6.75% (Original Issue Yield: 7.00%), 6/1/2039
BBB/Baa3 $ 2,307,780
1,000,000 Inglewood, CA Public Financing Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1999A), 5.625% (AMBAC INS), 8/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 1,109,170
500,000 Inland Empire Solid Waste Financing Authority, CA, Revenue Bonds (Series B), 6.25% (Escrowed In Treasuries COL), 8/1/2011
AAA/Aaa 548,415
500,000 La Verne, CA, Revenue COPs (Series 2003B), 6.625% (Brethren Hillcrest Homes)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.70%), 2/15/2025
BBB-/NR 556,630
1,000,000 Long Beach, CA Bond Financing Authority, Plaza Parking Facility Lease Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Original Issue Yield: 5.54%), 11/1/2021
A+/NR 1,062,320
1,000,000 Los Angeles, CA Community College District, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (FSA INS), 8/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 1,106,620
480,000 Los Angeles, CA Community Redevelopment Agency, Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series A), 6.55% (AMBAC INS), 1/1/2027
AAA/Aaa 485,486
1,000,000 Oakland, CA Unified School District, UT GO (Series 2000F), 5.60% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.63%), 8/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,102,850
500,000 Orange County, CA Community Facilities District No. 2000-1, Special Tax Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.25% (Ladera Ranch)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.28%), 8/15/2030
NR 535,345
400,000 Orange County, CA Community Facilities District No. 2000-1, Special Tax Bonds (Series 2002A), 6.00% (Ladera Ranch)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.03%), 8/15/2032
NR 429,124
500,000 Orange County, CA Community Facilities District No. 2000-1, Special Tax Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.625% (Ladera Ranch)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.65%), 8/15/2034
NR 521,125
1,000,000 Oxnard, CA Union High School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series 2001A), 6.20% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 8/1/2030
AAA/Aaa 1,196,140
500,000 Perris, CA Public Financing Authority, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 5.75% (Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 10/1/2031
A-/NR 538,465
900,000 Port of Oakland, CA, Revenue Bonds (Series 1997G), 5.50% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.83%), 11/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 954,279
1,000,000 Port of Oakland, CA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2000K), 5.75% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.78%), 11/1/2020
AAA/Aaa 1,081,950
1,000,000 Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority, CA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004), 5.875% (Eisenhower Medical Center), 7/1/2026
NR/A3 1,091,250
2,000,000 Richmond, CA, Wastewater Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.80% (FGIC INS), 8/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 2,224,700
1,000,000 San Bernardino County, CA Housing Authority, Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 6.70% (Glen Aire Park)/(GNMA Collateralized Home Mortgage Program GTD), 12/20/2041
NR/Aaa 1,097,500
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
California--continued
$ 350,000 San Bernardino County, CA Housing Authority, Subordinated Revenue Bonds, 7.25% (Glen Aire Park & Pacific Palms), 4/15/2042
NR $ 332,213
1,000,000 San Diego County, CA, COPs, 5.25% (University of San Diego)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.47%), 10/1/2021
NR/A2 1,063,820
1,000,000 San Diego County, CA, Refunding COPs (Series 2005), 5.00% (AMBAC INS), 2/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,085,560
300,000 San Dimas, CA Housing Authority, Mobile Home Park Revenue Bonds (Series 1998A), 5.70% (Charter Oak Mobile Home Estates Acquisition Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 7/1/2028
NR 309,843
300,000 San Francisco, CA City & County Airport Commission, Second Series Revenue Bonds (Issue 12A), 5.90% (San Francisco International Airport)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.97%), 5/1/2026
A/A1 307,548
400,000 San Francisco, CA City & County Redevelopment Agency Community Facilities District No. 6, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, 6.625% (Mission Bay South), 8/1/2027
NR 437,472
1,000,000 San Jose, CA Unified School District, COPs, 5.75% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 6/1/2020
AAA/Aaa 1,054,540
500,000 San Mateo, CA Redevelopment Agency, Merged Area Tax Allocation Bonds (Series 2001A), 5.50% (Original Issue Yield: 5.55%), 8/1/2022
A-/Baa1 536,155
1,000,000 Santa Clara County, CA Housing Authority, MFH Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 5.85% (River Town Apartments Project), 8/1/2031
NR/A3 1,032,510
1,500,000 Simi Valley, CA PFA, Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 1995), 5.75% (AMBAC INS), 9/1/2015
AAA/Aaa 1,646,085
1,000,000 South El Monte, CA Improvement District, Tax Allocation Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (Radian Asset Assurance INS), 8/1/2030
AA/Aa3 1,047,570
1,000,000 South Orange County, CA Public Financing Authority, 1999 Reassessment Revenue Bonds, 5.80% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 9/2/2018
NR/Aaa 1,109,470
1,000,000 Southern California Logistics Airport Authority, Tax Allocation Bonds, 5.00% (Radian Asset Assurance INS), 12/1/2035
AA/NR 1,041,450
400,000 Stockton, CA Community Facilities District No. 2001-1, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, 6.375% (Spanos Park West)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.43%), 9/1/2032
NR 430,788
1,400,000 Stockton, CA, COPs (Series 1999), 5.875% (Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 8/1/2019
A/NR 1,508,080
400,000 Stockton, CA, Health Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 1997A), 5.70% (Dameron Hospital Association), 12/1/2014
BBB+/NR 420,808
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
California--continued
$ 2,000,000 Sweetwater, CA Union High School District Public Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (FSA INS), 9/1/2029
AAA/Aaa $ 2,128,720
1,000,000 Torrance, CA, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2001 A), 5.50% (Torrance Memorial Medical Center)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.65%), 6/1/2031
A+/A1 1,062,800
1,000,000 Val Verde, CA Unified School District, Refunding COPs (Series 2005B), 5.00% (FGIC INS), 1/1/2021
AAA/NR 1,075,180
1,000,000 Vallejo, CA Unified School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.90% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 2/1/2021
AAA/Aaa 1,233,350
1,000,000 Vista, CA Community Development Commission, Tax Allocation Bonds (Series 2001), 5.80% (Vista Redevelopment Project Area)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 9/1/2030
BBB+/NR 1,054,620
965,000 Walnut, CA Public Financing Authority, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 5.375% (Walnut Improvement Project)/(AMBAC INS), 9/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,071,382
500,000 Watsonville, CA, Insured Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1996A), 6.20% (Watsonville Community Hospital)/(Escrowed In Treasuries COL)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.225%), 7/1/2012
NR 567,790
1,000,000 Whittier, CA, Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.80%), 6/1/2031

A/NR


1,076,070
   TOTAL




78,817,206
Puerto Rico--2.4%
1,000,000 3,4 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Drivers (Series 266), 8.2089% (FSA INS), 7/1/2015
AAA/NR 1,325,750
595,000 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Cogeneration Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.625% (AES Puerto Rico Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.65%), 6/1/2026

NR/Baa3


646,384
   TOTAL




1,972,134
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (IDENTIFIED COST $75,514,827)




80,789,340
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--0.7%
Puerto Rico--0.7%
$ 600,000 Puerto Rico Government Development Bank (GDB) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Credit Suisse, Zurich LIQ) (AT AMORTIZED COST)

A-1/VMIG1

$
600,000
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--99.7%
(IDENTIFIED COST $76,114,827) 5





81,389,340
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.3%




233,944
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%



$
81,623,284

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 13.5% of the Fund's portfolio as calculated based upon total portfolio market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 Current credit ratings are unaudited.

2 Pledged as collateral to ensure the Fund is able to satisfy the obligations of its outstanding short future contracts.

3 Denotes a restricted security, including securities purchased under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities, unless registered under the Act or exempted from registration, may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. At August 31, 2005, these securities amounted to $3,218,994 which represents 3.9% of total net assets.

4 Denotes a restricted security, including securities purchased under Rule 144A that have been deemed liquid by criteria approved by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At August 31, 2005, these securities amounted to $1,728,746 which represents 2.1% of total net assets.

5 The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $76,111,746.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at August 31, 2005.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
COL --Collateralized
COPs --Certificates of Participation
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA --Financial Security Assurance
GNMA --Government National Mortgage Association
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
HDFA --Housing Development Finance Authority
INS --Insured
LIQ --Liquidity Agreement
LOC --Letter of Credit
MFH --Multi Family Housing
PCFA --Pollution Control Finance Authority
PFA --Public Facility Authority
PRF --Prerefunded
SFM --Single Family Mortgage
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
UT --Unlimited Tax
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

August 31, 2005

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at value (identified cost $76,114,827)
$ 81,389,340
Cash
13,236
Income receivable
1,071,002
Receivable for investments sold
10,000
Receivable for shares sold





204,144

   TOTAL ASSETS





82,687,722

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 396,560
Payable for shares redeemed
479,076
Income distribution payable
104,508
Payable for daily variation margin
10,000
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
24,057
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
17,122
Accrued expenses


33,115




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





1,064,438

Net assets for 7,355,001 shares outstanding




$
81,623,284

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 79,710,490
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and futures contracts
5,254,745
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and futures contracts
(3,341,819 )
Accumulated net investment income (loss)





(132
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
81,623,284

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share
Class A Shares:
Net asset value per share ($44,159,222 ÷ 3,979,065 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$11.10

Offering price per share (100/95.50 of $11.10) 1





$11.62

Redemption proceeds per share





$11.10

Class B Shares:
Net asset value per share ($37,464,062 ÷ 3,375,936 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$11.10

Offering price per share





$11.10

Redemption proceeds per share (94.50/100 of $11.10) 1





$10.49

1 See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended August 31, 2005

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
4,128,503

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 318,342
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
190,000
Custodian fees
5,520
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
57,390
Directors'/Trustees' fees
2,176
Auditing fees
18,606
Legal fees
6,900
Portfolio accounting fees
65,090
Distribution services fee--Class A Shares (Note 5)
96,418
Distribution services fee--Class B Shares (Note 5)
307,638
Shareholder services fee--Class A Shares (Note 5)
95,892
Shareholder services fee--Class B Shares (Note 5)
102,546
Share registration costs
28,143
Printing and postage
14,628
Insurance premiums
8,471
Miscellaneous






2,071





   TOTAL EXPENSES






1,319,831





Waivers and Reimbursement (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (318,342 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(34,204 )
Waiver of distribution services fee--Class A Shares
(96,418 )
Reimbursement of other operating expenses


(161,253
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS AND REIMBURSEMENT






(610,217
)




Net expenses










709,614

Net investment income










3,418,889

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Futures Contracts:
Net realized gain on investments
350,470
Net realized loss on futures contracts
(66,985 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments
824,507
Net change in unrealized depreciation of futures contracts










(28,431
)
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and futures contracts










1,079,561

Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
4,498,450

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended August 31
   

2005

   

2004

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 3,418,889 $ 3,718,858
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts
283,485 (38,480 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts


796,076



1,900,235

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


4,498,450



5,580,613

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Class A Shares
(1,802,605 ) (1,770,023 )
Class B Shares


(1,615,587
)


(1,947,806
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(3,418,192
)


(3,717,829
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
15,113,488 9,037,022
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
2,088,041 2,186,350
Cost of shares redeemed


(14,700,388
)


(22,572,306
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


2,501,141



(11,348,934
)
Change in net assets


3,581,399



(9,486,150
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


78,041,885



87,528,035

End of period (including accumulated net investment income (loss) of $(132) and $(65), respectively)

$
81,623,284


$
78,041,885

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

August 31, 2005

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of seven portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated California Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a non-diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal regular income tax (federal regular income tax does not include the federal alternative minimum tax) and the personal income taxes imposed by the state of California and California municipalities. Interest income from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations. The Fund offers two classes of shares: Class A Shares and Class B Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

Municipal bonds are valued by an independent pricing service, taking into consideration yield, liquidity, risk, credit quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, and any other factors or market data the pricing service deems relevant. The Fund generally values short-term securities according to prices furnished by an independent pricing service, except that short-term securities with remaining maturities of less than 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at amortized cost. Prices furnished by an independent pricing service are intended to be indicative of the mean between the bid and asked prices currently offered to institutional investors for the securities. Securities for which no quotations are readily available are valued at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the "Trustees").

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses, and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Dividend income and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized/accreted for financial statement purposes.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Swap Contracts

The Fund may enter into swap contracts. A swap is an exchange of cash payments between the Fund and another party, which is based on a specific financial index. The value of the swap is adjusted daily and the change in value is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When a swap contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. The swap contracts entered into by the Fund are on a forward settling basis. For the year ended August 31,2005, the Fund had no realized losses on swap contracts.

Risks may arise upon entering into these agreements from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contract and from unanticipated changes in the value of the financial index on which the swap agreement is based. The Fund uses swaps for hedging purposes to reduce its exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had no open swap contracts.

Futures Contracts

The Fund periodically may sell bond interest rate futures contracts to manage duration and to potentially reduce transaction costs. Upon entering into a bond interest rate futures contract with a broker, the Fund is required to deposit in a segregated account a specified amount of cash or U.S. government securities. Futures contracts are valued daily and unrealized gains or losses are recorded in a "variation margin" account. Daily, the Fund receives from or pays to the broker a specified amount of cash based upon changes in the variation margin account. When a contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. Futures contracts have market risks, including the risk that the change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had net realized loss on future contracts of $66,985.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had the following open futures contracts:

Expiration Date
   
Contracts to Receive
   
Position
   
Unrealized
Depreciation

December 2005

20 U.S. Treasury Notes 10 Year Futures

Short

($19,768)

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from such registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund's restricted securities are valued at the price provided by dealers in the secondary market or, if no market prices are available, at the fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Trustees.

Additional information on restricted securities, excluding securities purchased under Rule 144A that have been deemed liquid by the Trustees, held at August 31, 2005, is as follows:

Security
   
Acquisition Date
   
Acquisition Cost
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2001), 6.75% (Saint Mark's School), 6/1/2028

7/3/2001

$ 500,000
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 6.75% (Prospect Sierra School)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.85%), 9/1/2032

5/10/2002

$ 395,058
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.50% (Turningpoint School), 11/1/2031

3/23/2001

$ 500,000
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 4.875% (Thomas Jefferson School of Law)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.93%), 10/1/2035

8/26/2005

$ 396,561
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Drivers (Series 266), 8.2089% (FSA INS), 7/1/2015

6/27/2002

$1,237,060

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

Class A Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,249,922 $ 13,786,385 667,738 $ 7,306,120
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

98,959

1,089,826

90,213

984,973
Shares redeemed

(500,918
)


(5,516,722
)

(1,046,644
)


(11,414,259
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS A SHARE TRANSACTIONS


847,963





$
9,359,489




(288,693
)



$
(3,123,166
)
Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

Class B Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
120,033 $ 1,327,103 158,215 $ 1,730,902
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

90,665


998,215

109,957


1,201,377
Shares redeemed

(834,208
)


(9,183,666
)

(1,025,938
)


(11,158,047
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS B SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(623,510
)



$
(6,858,348
)


(757,766
)



$
(8,225,768
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


224,453





$
2,501,141




(1,046,459
)



$
(11,348,934
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

For the year ended August 31, 2005, permanent differences identified and reclassified among the components of net assets were as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Undistributed
Net Investment
Income (Loss)

   
Accumulated
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)

$(764)

$764

Net investment income, net realized gains (losses), and net assets were not affected by this reclassification.

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004 was as follows:


   
2005
   
2004
Tax-exempt income

$3,418,192

$3,717,829

As of August 31, 2005, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income
   
$
104,374
Net unrealized appreciation

$
5,277,594
Capital loss carryforward

$
3,364,668

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

At August 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $76,111,746. The net unrealized appreciation of investments for federal tax purposes excluding any unrealized depreciation from futures contracts was $5,277,594. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $5,305,755 and net unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $28,161.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $3,364,668 which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire as follows:

Expiration Year
   
Expiration Amount
2008

$ 790,867
2009

$1,337,342
2010

$ 166,229
2011

$ 562,757
2012

$ 507,473

The Fund used capital loss carryforwards of $256,294 to offset taxable gains realized during the year ended August 31, 2005.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee and/or reimburse certain operating expenses of the Fund. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Adviser voluntarily waived $318,342 of its fee and reimbursed $161,253 of other operating expenses.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of all Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.20% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares and Class B Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses according to the following schedule annually, to compensate FSC.

Share Class Name


   
Percentage of Average Daily
Net Assets of Class

Class A Shares

0.25%
Class B Shares

0.75%

FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC voluntarily waived $96,418 of its fee for the Class A Shares. Rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay fees to FSC and FSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

Sales Charges

For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC retained $22,581 in sales charges from the sale of Class A Shares. See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Services Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares and Class B Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), a subsidiary of Federated Investors, Inc., for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Under certain agreements, rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay Service Fees to FSSC and FSSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. This voluntary waiver can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC retained $1,871of fees paid by the Fund.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $23,700,000 and $23,400,000, respectively.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations, for the year ended August 31, 2005, were as follows:

Purchases
   
$
17,022,825
Sales

$
14,300,016

7. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Since the Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers located in one state, it will be more susceptible to factors adversely affecting issuers of that state than would be a comparable tax-exempt mutual fund that invests nationally. In order to reduce the credit risk associated with such factors, at August 31, 2005, 43.4% of the securities in the portfolio of investments is backed by letters of credit or bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The largest percentage of investments insured by or supported (backed) by a letter of credit from any one institution or agency was 10.3% of total investments.

8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and will respond appropriately. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At August 31, 2005, 100.0% of the distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FEDERATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES INCOME TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Federated California Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust, as of August 31, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and broker. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of August 31, 2005, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 18, 2005

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund ( i.e. , "Interested" Board members) and those who are not ( i.e. , "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2004, the Trust comprised seven portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 44 investment companies (comprising 133 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Chairman and Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.; Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1998
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc. (marketing communications and technology) (prior to 9/1/00).

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue and Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Began Serving

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard J. Thomas
Birth Date: June 17, 1954
TREASURER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; held various management positions within Funds Financial Services Division of Federated Investors, Inc.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE CHAIRMAN
Began serving: August 2002
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



J. Scott Albrecht
Birth Date: June 1, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations: J. Scott Albrecht is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Albrecht joined Federated in 1989. He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1997 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. He was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Albrecht is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Public Management from Carnegie Mellon University.



Board Review of Advisory Contract

As required by the Act, the Fund's Board has reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considers many factors, among the most material of which are: the Fund's investment objectives; the Adviser's management philosophy, personnel, processes, and investment and operating strategies; long-term performance; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the range and quality of services provided to the Fund and its shareholders by the Federated organization in addition to investment advisory services; and the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds.

In its decision to appoint or renew the Adviser, the Board is mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognizes that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's "selection" or approval of the Adviser must reflect the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund. The Board also considers the compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This includes fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. In this regard, the Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Adviser's service and fee. The Fund's Board is aware of these factors and is guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considers and weighs these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. In this regard, the Board requests and receives substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization. Federated provides much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnishes additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board's evaluation of an advisory contract is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, personnel, and processes; operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities; the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The evaluation process is evolutionary, reflecting continually developing considerations. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focuses on comparisons with other similar mutual funds (rather than non-mutual fund products or services) because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle already chosen by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group may be a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing on the Fund's investment program, which would in turn assist the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services are such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract.

The Board also receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses. Although the Board considers the profitability of the Federated organization as a whole, it does not evaluate, on a fund-by-fund basis, Federated's "profitability" and/or "costs" (which would include an assessment as to whether "economies of scale" would be realized if the fund were to grow to some sufficient size). In the Board's view, the cost of performing advisory services on a fund-specific basis is both difficult to estimate satisfactorily and a relatively minor consideration in its overall evaluation. Analyzing isolated funds would require constructed allocations of the costs of shared resources and operations based on artificial assumptions that are inconsistent with the existing relationships within a large and diversified family of funds that receive advisory and other services from the same organization. Although the Board is always eager to discover any genuine "economies of scale," its experience has been that such "economies" are likely to arise only when a fund grows dramatically, and becomes and remains very large in size. Even in these instances, purchase and redemption activity, as well as the presence of expense limitations (if any), may offset any perceived economies. As suggested above, the Board considers the information it receives about the Fund's performance and expenses as compared to an appropriate set of similar competing funds to be more relevant.

The Board bases its decision to approve an advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above are relevant to every Federated fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provide a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated California Municipal Income Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 313923104
Cusip 313923203

28991 (10/05)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2005 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Michigan Intermediate Municipal Trust

A Portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

August 31, 2005

Class A Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
BOARD REVIEW OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

   
2001

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$11.36 $11.17 $11.22 $11.06 $10.64
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.44 0.43 0.45 0.50 1 0.53
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts

(0.13
)

0.19


(0.05
)

0.16
1

0.42

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.31


0.62


0.40


0.66


0.95

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.44
)

(0.43
)

(0.45
)

(0.50
)

(0.53
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$11.23


$11.36


$11.17


$11.22


$11.06

Total Return 2

2.78
%

5.60
%

3.58
%

6.15
%

9.12
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.50
%

0.50
%

0.50
%

0.50
%

0.50
%
Net investment income

3.91
%

3.76
%

3.96
%

4.53
% 1

4.86
%
Expense waiver 3

0.32
%

0.36
%

0.36
%

0.39
%

0.42
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$213,304

$164,213

$147,959

$134,718

$107,043

Portfolio turnover

21
%

20
%

15
%

19
%

13
%

1 Effective September 1, 2001, the Fund adopted the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began accreting discount on debt securities. For the year ended August 31, 2002, this change had no effect on the net investment income per share, net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share, or the ratio of net investment income to average net assets. Per share, ratios and supplemental data for the periods prior to September 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2005.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


   
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/2005

   
Ending
Account Value
8/31/2005

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,018.00

$2.54
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,022.68

$2.55

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio of 0.50% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

The fund's total return, based on net asset value, for the 12-month reporting period was 2.78% for Class A Shares. 1 The total return of the Lehman Brothers 7-Year General Obligation Municipal Bond Index (LB7GO), 2 the fund's benchmark index, was 2.90% for the 12-month reporting period. The fund's total return reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs and other expenses which were not reflected in the total return of the LB7GO.

The fund's investment strategy focused on: (a) the effective duration of the portfolio (which indicates the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates); (b) the selection of securities with different maturities (expressed by a "yield curve" showing the relative yield of similar securities with different maturities); (c) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as "sectors"); and (d) the credit quality of portfolio securities (which indicates the risk that securities will default). 3 These were the most significant factors affecting the fund's performance relative to the index.

The following discussion will focus on the performance of the fund's Class A Shares. The 2.78% total return of the Class A Shares for the reporting period consisted of 3.92% of tax-exempt dividends and 1.14% of price depreciation. 4

MARKET OVERVIEW

The reporting period was characterized by a flattening yield curve, tightening credit spreads and a large supply of new tax-exempt municipal bonds.

During the reporting period, the Federal Reserve Board (the "Fed") continued tightening interest rates, raising the Federal Funds Target Rate from 1.50% in August 2004 to 3.50% in August 2005. Consequently, interest rates throughout the short end of the yield curve rose as well. According to Municipal Market Data (MMD), yields on AAA-rated general obligation tax-exempt municipal bonds rose by 133 basis points for 1 year-maturity bonds, and tapered to a 4 basis point increase for 9-year maturity bonds.

1 The shares of the Fund were redesignated as Class A Shares effective January 1, 2005.

2 The LB7GO is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds, issued after January 1, 1991, with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa, which have been issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million, have a maturity value of at least $5 million and a maturity range of six to eight years. The LB7GO also includes zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

3 Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices.

4 Income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

During the reporting period, long-term interest rates fell by as much as 53 basis points according to MMD. A variety of factors appeared to come together to cause long-term interest rates to fall in the face of the Fed's tightening of interest rates. High oil prices and signs of a slowing economy appeared to dampen inflation fears. At the same time, continued international turmoil and excess foreign capital kept the demand high for U.S. Treasury securities. The net effect was that the yield spread between 1- and 30-year AAA-rated general obligation tax-exempt bonds fell from 322 basis points to 141 basis points, and the tax-exempt municipal yield curve flattened, during the reporting period (that is, while securities provided higher incremental income or yield as maturities became longer, the amount of the increase in incremental income was less or flattened).

Credit spreads (the yield difference between AAA-rated tax-exempt municipal bonds and bonds of lower credit quality and similar maturity) tightened significantly during the reporting period. According to Lehman Brothers, Inc., the credit spread between their high yield municipal index, the Lehman Brothers Non-Investment Grade Municipal Bond Index, 5 and their investment grade municipal index, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, 6 tightened from 313 basis points to 222 basis points. 7

The 12-month reporting period also saw a large supply of new tax-exempt municipal bonds. During calendar year 2004, issuance of new tax-exempt municipal bonds was the second-highest ever. This followed the record new issuance of tax-exempt municipal bonds in 2003. Issuance from January 1, 2005, through July 31, 2005, appeared to keep pace with the previous two calendar years.

5 The Lehman Brothers Non-Investment Grade Municipal Bond Index (LBNIGMBI) is a broad market performance benchmark for the high-yield, tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBNIGMBI, bonds must be non-rated or be rated Ba1 or below, have been issued as part of a transaction of at least $20 million, have an outstanding part value of at least $3 million, and have a remaining maturity of at least 1 year.

6 The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB) is a broad-based securities market index and a broad market performance benchmark for the tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBMB, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of Baa, have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The LBMB includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

7 Investment grade securities are securities that are rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Non-investment grade (or high-yield) securities are securities that are not rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.

During the reporting period, according to MMD, credit spreads on Michigan general obligation bonds widened by two to four basis points. This was reflective of Michigan's declining credit quality. In December, 2004, Fitch Ratings, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), downgraded Michigan's general obligation bonds from AA+ to AA. Moody's Investors Service, another NRSRO, followed suit in January 2005, downgrading Michigan's general obligation bonds from Aa2 to Aa1. In March 2004, Standard & Poor's, another NRSRO, lowered Michigan's general obligation bond rating from AA+ to AA. 8

Supply of Michigan tax-exempt bonds through the first seven months of 2005 was more than double the same period in 2004.

DURATION 9 AND YIELD CURVE/MATURITY

As determined at the end of the reporting period, the fund's dollar-weighted average duration was 4.4 years. Duration management is a significant component of the fund's investment strategy. As an intermediate fund, much of the fund's holdings were positioned on the short and intermediate parts of the yield curve; this part of the yield curve saw rising short-term interest rates, and, hence, negative returns. The fund's duration was maintained short of the duration of the LB7GO during the reporting period. This duration position benefited the fund's performance relative to the LB7GO because the impact of rising short-term interest rates was somewhat counteracted.

8 Credit ratings pertain only to the securities in the portfolio and do not protect fund shares against market risk.

9 Duration is a measure of a security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations.

SECTOR

The fund's best performing sectors were lower-quality sectors, including healthcare, lifecare, and industrial development bonds. These lower-quality sectors benefited from higher yields, improving credit quality, and tightening credit spreads. Lagging sectors for the fund included general obligation, single family housing and water and sewer bonds, which were higher-quality sectors that did not perform as well as the lower-quality sectors.

The fund's performance also benefited from having a number of holdings advance refunded. Advance refunding is a defeasance of the bonds, with U.S. Treasury securities held in escrow to guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the bonds to the appropriate call or maturity date. During the reporting period, 23 bonds in the fund's portfolio representing over $24 million in par value were advance refunded.

CREDIT QUALITY

The fund maintained a high-quality portfolio, with over 90% of the portfolio rated in one of the three highest rating categories (AAA, AA, and A) as of the end of the reporting period. Given the tightening of credit spreads in lower-quality, tax-exempt bonds, the fund's positioning had a negative impact on the fund's performance relative to the LBMB because higher-quality, tax-exempt bonds did not perform as well as lower-quality, tax-exempt bonds during the reporting period.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 1 in the Federated Michigan Intermediate Municipal Trust (the "Fund") from August 31, 1995 to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers 7-Year General Obligations Municipal Bond Index (LB7GO) and the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB). 2

Average Annual Total Return 3 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   

1 Year

(0.29)%
5 Years

4.78%
10 Years

4.77%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum sales charge of 3.00%.

1 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting the maximum sales charge of 3.00% ($10,000 investment minus $300 sales charge = $9,700). The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LB7GO and the LBMB have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the indexes.

2 The LB7GO and the LBMB are not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the Securities and Exchange Commission requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance. These indexes are unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, are not affected by cashflows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

3 Total return quoted reflects all applicable sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges.

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400.

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At August 31, 2005, the Fund's credit-quality ratings composition 1 was as follows:

S&P Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

    Moody's Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

AAA
   
54.4%
Aaa
   
53.1%
AA

27.8%
Aa

31.0%
A

7.3%
A

4.7%
BBB

3.8%
Baa

3.0%
BB

0.3%
Ba

0.3%
B

0.0%
B

0.0%
Not Rated by S&P

6.4%
Not Rated by Moody's

7.9%
   TOTAL

100.0%
   TOTAL

100.0%

1 These tables depict the long-term, credit-quality ratings assigned to the Fund's portfolio holdings by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), each of which is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). These credit-quality ratings are shown without regard to gradations within a given rating category. For example, securities rated "A-" have been included in the "A" rated category. Rated securities that have been prerefunded, but not rated again by the NRSRO, have been included in the "Not rated by..." category.

Rated securities include a security with an obligor and/or credit enhancer that has received a rating from an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt obligations that is comparable in priority and security with the security held by the Fund. Credit-quality ratings are an assessment of the risk that a security will default in payment and do not address other risks presented by the security. Please see the descriptions of credit-quality ratings in the Fund's Statement of Additional Information.

Holdings that are rated only by a different NRSRO than the one identified have been included in the "Not rated by..." category. Of the portfolio's total investments, all securities have received a rating by one of these NRSROs.

2 Percentages are based on total investments, which may differ from the Fund's total net assets used in computing the percentages in the Portfolio of Investments which follows.

Portfolio of Investments

August 31, 2005

Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--98.6%   
Michigan--98.6%
$ 500,000 Anchor Bay, MI School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series III), 5.50% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2014
AA/Aa2 $ 558,915
1,000,000 Anchor Bay, MI School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series III), 5.50% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2017
AA/Aa2 1,117,010
365,000 Anchor Bay, MI School District, School Building & Site UT GO Bonds (Series II), 6.125% (FGIC INS), 5/1/2011
AAA/Aaa 417,570
500,000 Anchor Bay, MI School District, School Building & Site UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2012
AA/Aa2 548,025
1,070,000 Anchor Bay, MI School District, UT GO Bonds (Series 1999I), 5.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2009 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.80%), 5/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 1,168,482
1,120,000 Ann Arbor, MI Building Authority, Refunding LT GO Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 3/1/2013
AAA/Aaa 1,232,694
500,000 Avondale, MI School District, School Building & Site UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2010
AA/Aa2 538,820
1,500,000 Bishop, MI International Airport Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 199B), 5.125% (American Capital Access INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.25%), 12/1/2017
A/NR 1,577,295
1,090,000 Boyne City, MI Public School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.60% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2009 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.70%), 5/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 1,184,699
1,215,000 Bridgeport Spaulding, MI Community School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2015
AA/Aa2 1,358,698
1,125,000 Brighton Township, MI, LT GO Sanitary Sewer Drainage District, 5.25% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.68%), 10/1/2020
AAA/Aaa 1,191,892
1,875,000 Caledonia, MI Community Schools, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 5/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 2,072,287
2,050,000 Caledonia, MI Community Schools, UT GO Bonds, 5.40% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.48%), 5/1/2018
AA/Aa2 2,246,021
860,000 Central Michigan University, Revenue Bonds, 5.20% (U.S. Treasury PRF 4/1/2007 @ 101)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.227%), 10/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 898,244
1,775,000 Charles Stewart Mott Community College, MI, Building & Improvement UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.63%), 5/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 1,952,358
1,070,000 Charlevoix, MI Public School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.25% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2014
AA/Aa2 1,172,687
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 1,245,000 Charlevoix, MI Public School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.25% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2016
AA/Aa2 $ 1,366,661
1,690,000 Chippewa Valley, MI Schools, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2009
AA/Aa2 1,800,289
1,775,000 Chippewa Valley, MI Schools, School Building & Site Refunding Bonds, 5.50% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2012 @ 100), 5/1/2015
AA/Aa2 1,994,691
1,000,000 Cornell Township MI, Economic Development Corp., Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.875% (MeadWestvaco Corp.)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2012 @ 100), 5/1/2018
AAA/Baa2 1,145,960
1,000,000 Detroit, MI Sewage Disposal System, Senior Lien Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.00% (FSA INS), 7/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 1,067,570
500,000 Detroit, MI Water Supply System, Second Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 1995A), 5.10% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.20%), 7/1/2007
AAA/Aaa 519,165
1,000,000 Detroit, MI Water Supply System, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 1999A), 5.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 1/1/2010 @ 101)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.84%), 7/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,113,020
2,070,000 Detroit, MI Water Supply System, Senior Lien Bonds, 5.00% (FGIC INS), 7/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 2,294,947
1,335,000 Detroit, MI, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.75% (FSA INS), 4/1/2010
AAA/Aaa 1,469,741
1,000,000 Detroit, MI, UT GO Bonds (Series 1999A), 5.00% (FSA INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.16%), 4/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,064,300
1,000,000 Detroit, MI, UT GO Bonds, (Series A-1), 5.375% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 4/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 1,105,080
1,000,000 Detroit, MI, UT GO Refunding Bonds, 5.25% (AMBAC INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.29%), 5/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 1,056,100
1,000,000 Detroit/Wayne County, MI Stadium Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.55%), 2/1/2011
AAA/Aaa 1,049,670
1,000,000 Dickinson County, MI Economic Development Corp., Refunding Environmental Improvement Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.75% (International Paper Co.), 6/1/2016
BBB/Baa2 1,079,480
2,000,000 Dickinson County, MI Economic Development Corp., Refunding PCR Bonds (Series 2004A), 4.80% (International Paper Co.), 11/1/2018
BBB/Baa2 2,015,080
1,925,000 East Grand Rapids, MI Public School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series 2001), 5.50% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2019
AA/Aa2 2,130,109
2,270,000 East Lansing, MI School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series 2005B), 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 5/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 2,513,957
315,000 East Lansing, MI, UT GO Refunding Bonds (Series 1993B), 4.85%, 10/1/2007
AA/A1 315,491
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 1,000,000 Ecorse, MI Public School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2008 @ 101)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.59%), 5/1/2017
AAA/Aaa $ 1,071,950
1,100,000 Farmington, MI Public School District, UT GO Bonds, 4.00% (Q-SBLF GTD)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.27%), 5/1/2009
AA/Aa2 1,133,946
675,000 Ferris State University, MI, Revenue Bonds, 5.40% (U.S. Treasury PRF 4/1/2007 @ 101)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.45%), 10/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 707,096
1,000,000 Forest Hills, MI Public School, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00%, 5/1/2012
AA/Aa2 1,096,050
2,000,000 Forest Hills, MI Public School, UT GO Bonds, 5.25% (Original Issue Yield: 5.50%), 5/1/2019
NR/Aa2 2,178,320
1,075,000 Gibraltar, MI School District, School Building & SIte UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FGIC INS), 5/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 1,178,254
1,000,000 Grand Blanc, MI Community Schools, School Building & Site UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FSA INS), 5/1/2015
AAA/Aaa 1,101,200
200,000 Grand Rapids, MI Downtown Development Authority, Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, 6.60% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.70%), 6/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 202,608
1,000,000 Harper Creek, MI Community School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.125% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2011 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.21%), 5/1/2021
AA/Aa2 1,094,550
1,000,000 Hartland, MI Consolidated School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.375% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2016
AA/Aa2 1,098,000
1,650,000 Hartland, MI Consolidated School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.75% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2010
AA/Aa2 1,831,352
1,315,000 Hazel Park, MI School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2013
AA/Aa2 1,433,363
1,660,000 Hemlock, MI Public School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (U.S. Treasury PRF 11/1/2011 @ 100), 5/1/2018
AA/Aa2 1,858,752
1,375,000 Howell, MI Public Schools, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series 2001), 5.25% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2014
AA/Aa2 1,499,493
1,575,000 Howell, MI Public Schools, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.25% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2017
AA/Aa2 1,716,750
2,000,000 Howell, MI Public Schools, UT GO Bonds, 5.875% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2009 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.95%), 5/1/2022
AAA/Aaa 2,192,680
2,000,000 Jackson County, MI Public Schools, UT GO Bonds, 5.60% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.70%), 5/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 2,208,460
1,575,000 Jenison, MI Public Schools, UT GO Refunding Bonds, 5.25% (FGIC INS), 5/1/2011
AAA/Aaa 1,733,760
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 1,350,000 Kalamazoo, MI City School District, Building & Site UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FSA INS), 5/1/2013
AAA/Aaa $ 1,458,608
1,345,000 Kent County, MI, Capital Improvement LT GO Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.00%, 12/1/2020
AAA/Aaa 1,470,367
1,250,000 Kent Hospital Finance Authority, MI, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.50% (Metropolitan Hospital), 7/1/2020
BBB/NR 1,341,688
1,000,000 Kent Hospital Finance Authority, MI, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Spectrum Health)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 7/15/2011 @ 101), 1/15/2015
AA/Aa3 1,120,800
1,925,000 Lake Fenton, MI Community Schools, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2017
AA/Aa2 2,150,244
1,000,000 Lake Orion, MI School District, UT GO Bonds (Series 2000A), 5.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.89%), 5/1/2015
AAA/Aaa 1,110,690
1,700,000 Lake Superior State University, MI, General Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (AMBAC INS), 11/15/2021
AAA/Aaa 1,890,077
1,000,000 Lanse Creuse, MI Public Schools, UT GO Bonds (Series 2000), 5.40% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.50%), 5/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 1,095,620
500,000 Lansing, MI Sewer Disposal System, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (FGIC INS), 5/1/2011
AAA/Aaa 543,985
1,000,000 Madison, MI District Public Schools, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2009 @ 100), 5/1/2015
AAA/Aaa 1,083,440
2,000,000 Mattawan, MI Consolidated School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.65% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.67%), 5/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 2,212,760
1,350,000 Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, (Series XVII-A), 5.65% (AMBAC INS), 6/1/2010
AAA/Aaa 1,394,064
1,000,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 5.25% (Clean Water Revolving Fund), 10/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 1,065,610
1,000,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003C), 5.00% (Local Government Loan Program), 5/1/2008
AA/Aa2 1,050,270
1,000,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005B), 5.00% (Detroit, MI City School District)/ (FSA INS), 6/1/2013
AAA/NR 1,093,890
1,000,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005B), 5.00% (Detroit, MI City School District)/ (FSA INS), 6/1/2015
AAA/NR 1,101,070
1,200,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Clean Water Revolving Fund), 10/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 1,297,968
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 1,000,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Clean Water Revolving Fund)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 10/1/2009 @ 101), 10/1/2015
AAA/Aaa $ 1,108,680
1,455,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Drinking Water Revolving Fund), 10/1/2007
AAA/Aaa 1,523,458
810,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (State Revolving Fund), 10/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 832,939
2,190,000 Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.625% (Drinking Water Revolving Fund)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 10/1/2009 @ 101), 10/1/2013
AAA/Aaa 2,417,585
2,500,000 Michigan Public Power Agency, Belle River Project Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 1/1/2010
AAA/Aaa 2,708,350
1,500,000 Michigan Public Power Agency, Belle River Project Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 1/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 1,684,215
500,000 Michigan Public Power Agency, Campbell Project Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1997A), 5.50% (AMBAC INS), 1/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 504,475
1,000,000 Michigan State Building Authority, Facilities Program Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2001I), 5.50%, 10/15/2019
AA-/Aa3 1,113,100
1,000,000 Michigan State Building Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (State Police Communication System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 10/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 1,057,100
1,100,000 Michigan State Building Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series 1), 4.75% (Original Issue Yield: 4.98%), 10/15/2018
AA-/Aa3 1,148,664
1,000,000 Michigan State Comprehensive Transportation Board, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002B), 5.00% (FSA INS), 5/15/2008
AAA/Aaa 1,050,890
1,500,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.50% (Henry Ford Health System, MI), 3/1/2013
A-/A1 1,651,185
1,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Sparrow Obligated Group, MI), 11/15/2016
A+/A1 1,100,480
1,200,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (Sparrow Obligated Group, MI)/ (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 11/15/2016
AAA/Aaa 1,310,808
1,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (Sparrow Obligated Group, MI)/ (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 11/15/2017
AAA/Aaa 1,088,120
1,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (Marquette General Hospital, MI), 5/15/2012
NR/Baa1 1,059,640
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 1,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (Marquette General Hospital, MI), 5/15/2013
NR/Baa1 $ 1,059,160
1,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1998A), 4.90% (St. John Hospital, MI)/ (U.S. Treasury PRF)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.05%), 5/15/2013
AAA/#Aaa 1,050,380
1,300,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (Crittenton Hospital, MI), 3/1/2016
A+/A2 1,409,434
1,175,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.00% (Trinity Healthcare Credit Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.14%), 12/1/2020
AA-/Aa3 1,300,631
1,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue & Refunding Bonds (Series 1998A), 5.10% (McLaren Health Care Corp.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.15%), 6/1/2013
NR/A1 1,039,410
2,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1993P), 5.375% (Sisters of Mercy Health System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.55%), 8/15/2014
AAA/Aaa 2,202,080
1,325,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1997W), 5.00% (Mercy Health Services)/(U.S. Treasury COL)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.26%), 8/15/2011
NR/Aa2 1,386,772
2,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1999A), 6.00% (Ascension Health Credit Group)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 11/15/2011
AAA/Aaa 2,211,780
2,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C), 5.00% (McLaren Health Care Corp.), 8/1/2020
NR/A1 2,126,120
1,500,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Oakwood Obligated Group), 11/1/2010
A/A2 1,588,125
480,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.20% (Sparrow Obligated Group, MI)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 11/15/2006 @ 102), 11/15/2007
AAA/Aaa 502,354
450,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.30% (Sparrow Obligated Group, MI)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 11/15/2006 @ 102), 11/15/2008
AAA/Aaa 471,488
450,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.40% (Sparrow Obligated Group, MI)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 11/15/2006 @ 102), 11/15/2009
AAA/Aaa 472,014
1,000,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, 5.00% (Chelsea Community Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.30%), 5/15/2012
BBB/NR 1,010,070
600,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 5.10% (Henry Ford Health System, MI)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.20%), 11/15/2007
A-/A1 619,770
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 1,400,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 5.50% (MidMichigan Obligated Group)/ (FSA INS), 6/1/2008
AAA/Aaa $ 1,485,456
565,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, LO MFH Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.30% (Oakbrook Villa Townhomes)/(GNMA Collateralized Home Mortgage Program GTD), 7/20/2019
NR/Aaa 605,053
1,000,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, SFM Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 5.30% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 12/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 1,041,200
10,000 Michigan State South Central Power Agency, Power Supply System Revenue Bond, 5.80% (U.S. Treasury PRF)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 11/1/2005
AAA/Aaa 10,051
390,000 Michigan State South Central Power Agency, Power Supply System Revenue Refunding Bonds, 5.80% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 11/1/2005
AAA/Aaa 391,946
820,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004), 5.00% (NSF International), 8/1/2013
A-/NR 880,901
2,000,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, Revenue Bonds, 4.25% TOBs (Republic Services, Inc.), Mandatory Tender 4/1/2014
BBB+/NR 1,985,040
175,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, Revenue Bonds, 5.30% (Porter Hills Presbyterian Village, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.422%), 7/1/2018
BBB+/NR 180,159
325,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, Revenue Bonds, 5.30% (Porter Hills Presbyterian Village, Inc.)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 7/1/2008 @ 101)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.422%), 7/1/2018
BBB+/NR 347,354
1,105,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 5.40% (NSF International)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 8/1/2007 @ 101), 8/1/2010
NR/Aa3 1,162,162
1,065,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 5.50% (NSF International)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 8/1/2007 @ 101), 8/1/2011
NR/Aa3 1,122,052
600,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 7.10% (Ford Motor Co.)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.127%), 2/1/2006
BB+/Ba1 601,500
1,950,000 Michigan State Trunk Line, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1998A), 5.25%, 11/1/2012
AA/Aa3 2,177,000
1,000,000 Michigan State Trunk Line, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (FSA INS), 11/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 1,116,410
1,000,000 Michigan State Trunk Line, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (FSA INS), 11/1/2013
AAA/Aaa 1,122,950
1,000,000 Michigan State Trunk Line, Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 5.50% (FSA INS), 11/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 1,115,600
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 3,000,000 Michigan State, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00%, 12/1/2007
AA/Aa2 $ 3,133,320
1,250,000 Milan, MI Area Schools, UT GO Bonds (Series 2000A), 5.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.86%), 5/1/2020
AAA/Aaa 1,388,363
300,000 Montague, MI Public School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.125% (FSA INS), 5/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 304,539
300,000 Montague, MI Public School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.125% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2006 @ 100), 5/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 304,647
2,000,000 Mount Clemens, MI Community School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FSA INS), 5/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 2,214,940
1,200,000 Newaygo, MI Public Schools, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100), 5/1/2014
AA/Aa2 1,319,904
500,000 Northville, MI Public School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2007 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.05%), 5/1/2010
AAA/Aaa 516,680
1,765,000 Oakland County, MI EDC, LO Revenue Bonds (Series 1997), 5.50% (Lutheran Social Services of Michigan)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 6/1/2007 @ 102), 6/1/2014
NR/Aa3 1,875,048
1,250,000 Orchard View, MI Schools, School Building & Site Bonds (Series 2003), 5.00% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2010
AA/Aa2 1,347,050
1,000,000 Paw Paw, MI Public School District, School Building & Site UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 5/1/2020
AA/Aa2 1,099,920
275,000 Pewamo Westphalia, MI Community School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FGIC INS), 5/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 278,869
1,000,000 Pinckney, MI Community Schools, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FSA INS), 5/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 1,095,980
1,100,000 Plymouth-Canton, MI Community School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 4.50% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.55%), 5/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 1,132,197
500,000 Portage, MI Public Schools, UT GO Refunding Bonds, 4.35% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.47%), 5/1/2011
AAA/Aaa 518,235
500,000 Portage, MI Public Schools, UT GO Refunding Bonds, 4.45% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.57%), 5/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 518,320
1,625,000 River Rouge, MI School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FGIC INS), 5/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 1,731,048
1,000,000 Rochester, MI Community School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 5/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 1,017,590
2,775,000 Rockford, MI Public Schools, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FSA INS), 5/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 3,066,986
1,155,000 Romeo, MI Community School District, Building & Site UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.12%), 5/1/2012
AA/Aa2 1,245,552
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 1,170,000 Romulus, MI Community Schools, UT GO Bonds, 6.00% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2009 @ 100), 5/1/2011
AAA/Aaa $ 1,287,749
1,500,000 Roseville, MI School District, UT GO Bonds, 4.45% (FSA INS), 5/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 1,516,065
1,000,000 Saginaw, MI Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004G), 5.00% (Covenant Medical Center, Inc.), 7/1/2017
A/NR 1,055,830
1,500,000 Saginaw, MI Hospital Finance Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1999E), 5.625% (Covenant Medical Center, Inc.)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 7/1/2013
AAA/Aaa 1,632,960
5,000,000 Saginaw, MI Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, (Series F), 6.50% (Covenant Medical Center, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.645%), 7/1/2030
A/NR 5,498,550
2,000,000 Saline, MI Area Schools, UT GO Bonds (Series 2000A), 5.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100), 5/1/2018
AA/Aa2 2,221,380
1,000,000 Sault Ste Marie, MI Area Public Schools, UT GO Bonds, 5.375% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2009 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.65%), 5/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,079,130
675,000 South Lyon, MI Community School District, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 5.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 5/1/2019
AA/Aa2 749,716
1,165,000 South Lyon, MI Community School District, UT GO Bonds, (Series II), 5.25% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 5/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 1,300,070
1,675,000 Southfield, MI Public Schools, UT GO School Building and Site Bonds (Series B), 5.00% (FSA INS), 5/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 1,835,884
1,250,000 Trenton, MI Building Authority, LT GO Bonds, 5.625% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.73%), 10/1/2021
AAA/Aaa 1,389,950
170,000 Troy, MI City School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 4.75% (Q-SBLF GTD)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.80%), 5/1/2008
AA/Aa3 174,481
830,000 Troy, MI City School District, UT GO Bonds, 4.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2007 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.80%), 5/1/2008
AA/Aa3 854,336
1,000,000 University of Michigan, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series A-1), 5.25%, 12/1/2009
AA+/Aa2 1,059,220
1,000,000 Utica, MI Community Schools, UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2016
AA/Aa2 1,097,580
1,000,000 Utica, MI Community Schools, UT GO School Building & Site Refunding Bonds, 5.50% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2016
AA/Aa2 1,117,640
500,000 Walled Lake, MI Consolidated School District, School Building & Site UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 5/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 548,025
1,200,000 Washtenaw Community College, MI, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 4.90% (Original Issue Yield: 4.90%), 4/1/2006
AA/Aa3 1,214,280
1,450,000 Waterford, MI School District, UT GO Refunding Bonds, 4.85% (Q-SBLF GTD)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.90%), 6/1/2010
AA/Aa3 1,469,488
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Michigan--continued
$ 1,000,000 Waverly, MI Community Schools, School Building and Site UT GO Bonds (Series 2000), 5.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100), 5/1/2015
AAA/Aaa $ 1,110,690
1,000,000 Wayne County, MI Building Authority, LT GO Capital Improvement Bonds, 5.35% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.40%), 6/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 1,037,330
2,000,000 Wayne Westland Community Schools, MI, UT GO Refunding Bonds, 5.00% (FSA INS), 5/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 2,214,940
1,775,000 West Bloomfield, MI School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2011 @ 100), 5/1/2015
AAA/Aaa 1,976,977
900,000 West Bloomfield, MI School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.70% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2010 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.75%), 5/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 997,677
1,000,000 West Branch Rose City, MI Area School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (U.S. Treasury PRF 5/1/2009 @ 100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 5/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 1,083,440
800,000 West Ottawa, MI Public School District, UT GO Bonds (Series 2002A), 4.00% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2007
AA/Aa2 813,904
1,025,000 Whitehall, MI District Schools, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (Q-SBLF GTD), 5/1/2016
AA/Aa2 1,143,490
1,400,000 Wyandotte, MI Electric Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, 6.25% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.55%), 10/1/2008

AAA/Aaa


1,471,596
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS
(IDENTIFIED COST $200,029,897)





210,370,420
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--0.3%
Michigan--0.3%
700,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, (Series 1999 A) Weekly VRDNs (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.)/(Lasalle Bank, N.A. LOC)
(AT AMORTIZED COST)

A-1/NR


700,000
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--98.9%
(IDENTIFIED COST $200,729,897) 2





211,070,420
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--1.1%




2,233,702
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%



$
213,304,122

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 3.1% of the Fund's portfolio as calculated based upon total portfolio market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 Current credit ratings are unaudited.

2 The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $200,707,866.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at August 31, 2005.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
COL --Collateralized
EDC --Economic Development Commission
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA --Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
GNMA --Government National Mortgage Association
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
INS --Insured
LO --Limited Obligation
LOC --Letter of Credit
LT --Limited Tax
MFH --Multi-Family Housing
PCR --Pollution Control Revenue
PRF --Prerefunded
Q-SBLF --Qualified State Bond Loan Fund
SFM --Single Family Mortgage
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
UT --Unlimited Tax
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

August 31, 2005

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at value (identified cost $200,729,897)
$ 211,070,420
Cash
9,022
Income receivable
3,140,700
Receivable for shares sold





217,380

   TOTAL ASSETS





214,437,522

Liabilities:
Payable for shares redeemed
$ 838,531
Income distribution payable
253,144
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
12,725
Accrued expenses


29,000




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





1,133,400

Net assets for 18,994,383 shares outstanding




$
213,304,122

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 205,069,948
Net unrealized appreciation of investments
10,340,523
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and futures contracts
(2,106,279 )
Accumulated net investment income (loss)





(70
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
213,304,122

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
Net asset value per share ($213,304,122 ÷ 18,994,383 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$11.23

Offering price per share (100/97.00 of $11.23) 1





$11.58

Redemption proceeds per share





$11.23

1 See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended August 31, 2005

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
9,329,186

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 844,890
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
166,516
Custodian fees
12,094
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
41,927
Directors'/Trustees' fees
3,073
Auditing fees
18,605
Legal fees
8,218
Portfolio accounting fees
76,450
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
511,612
Share registration costs
20,843
Printing and postage
15,303
Insurance premiums
9,061
Miscellaneous






1,631





   TOTAL EXPENSES






1,730,223





Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (287,839 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(12,168 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee


(363,757
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS






(663,764
)




Net expenses










1,066,459

Net investment income










8,262,727

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Futures Contracts:
Net realized gain on investments










306,723

Net realized gain on futures contracts










84,010

Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments










(3,080,826
)
Net change in unrealized appreciation of futures contracts










(20,477
)
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments and futures contracts










(2,710,570
)
Change in net assets resulting from operations










$5,552,157

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended August 31
   

2005

   

2004

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 8,262,727 $ 6,049,930
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swap contracts
390,733 (1,611,390 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments and futures contracts


(3,101,303
)


3,320,726

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


5,552,157



7,759,266

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(8,246,812
)


(6,048,516
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
35,738,337 49,546,216
Proceeds from shares issued in connection with the tax-free transfer of assets from Golden Oak Michigan Tax-Free Bond Fund
58,659,582 --
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
4,621,790 2,705,245
Cost of shares redeemed


(47,234,100
)


(37,708,370
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


51,785,609



14,543,091

Change in net assets


49,090,954



16,253,841

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


164,213,168



147,959,327

End of period (including accumulated net investment income (loss) of $(70) and $(59), respectively)

$
213,304,122


$
164,213,168

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

August 31, 2005

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of seven portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated Michigan Intermediate Municipal Trust (the "Fund"), a non-diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal regular income tax and personal income taxes imposed by the state of Michigan and Michigan municipalities. Interest income from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations. The Fund offers one class of shares: Class A Shares.

On September 29, 2004, the Fund received assets from Golden Oak Michigan Tax-Free Bond Fund as a result of a tax-free reorganization, as follows:


   
Shares
of the
Fund
Issued

   
Golden Oak
Michigan
Tax-Free
Bond Fund
Net Assets
Received

   
Unrealized
Appreciation 1

   
Net Assets
of the Fund
Prior to
Combination

   
Net Assets of
Golden Oak
Michigan
Tax-Free
Bond Fund
Immediately
Prior to
Combination



   
Net Assets
of the Fund
Immediately
After
Combination

Golden Oak Michigan Tax- Free Bond Fund Class A Shares

5,090,009

$58,076,940

$3,621,705

--

$58,076,940

--
Golden Oak Michigan Tax- Free Bond Fund Class B Shares

51,065

582,642

11,721

--

582,642

--
   TOTAL

5,141,074

$58,659,582

$3,633,426

$159,760,822

$58,659,582

$218,420,404

1 Unrealized Appreciation is included in the Golden Oak Michigan Tax-Free Bond Fund Net Assets Received amount shown above.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

Municipal bonds are valued by an independent pricing service, taking into consideration yield, liquidity, risk, credit quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, and any other factors or market data the pricing service deems relevant. The Fund generally values short-term securities according to prices furnished by an independent pricing service, except that short-term securities with remaining maturities of less than 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at amortized cost. Prices furnished by an independent pricing service are intended to be indicative of the mean between the bid and asked prices currently offered to institutional investors for the securities. Securities for which no quotations are readily available are valued at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the "Trustees").

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized/accreted for financial statement purposes.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Swap Contracts

The Fund may enter into swap contracts. A swap is an exchange of cash payments between the Fund and another party, which is based on a specific financial index. The value of the swap is adjusted daily and the change in value is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When a swap contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. The swap contracts entered into by the Fund are on a forward settling basis. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had no realized gain (loss) on swap contracts.

Risks may arise upon entering into these agreements from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contract and from unanticipated changes in the value of the financial index on which the swap agreement is based. The Fund uses swaps for hedging purposes to reduce its exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had no open swap contracts.

Futures Contracts

The Fund periodically may sell bond interest rate futures contracts to manage duration and to potentially reduce transaction costs. Upon entering into a bond interest rate futures contract with a broker, the Fund is required to deposit in a segregated account a specified amount of cash or U.S. government securities. Futures contracts are valued daily and unrealized gains or losses are recorded in a "variation margin" account. Daily, the Fund receives from or pays to the broker a specified amount of cash based upon changes in the variation margin account. When a contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. Futures contracts have market risks, including the risk that the change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had net realized gains on future contracts of $84,010.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had no open futures contracts.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

Shares sold
3,169,167 4,306,696
Shares issued in connection with tax-free transfer of assets from Golden Oak Michigan Tax-Free Bond Fund
5,141,074 --
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
410,527 237,993
Shares redeemed

(4,187,599
)

(3,333,020
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

4,533,169


1,211,669

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are due in part to differing treatments for capital loss carryforwards acquired in a merger and discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

For the year ended August 31, 2005, permanent differences identified and reclassified among the components of net assets were as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Paid-in Capital
   
Undistributed Net
Investment Income (Loss)

   
Accumulated Net
Realized Losses

$100,970

$(15,926)

$(85,044)

Net investment income (loss), net realized gains (losses), and net assets were not affected by this reclassification.

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, was as follows:


   
2005
   
2004
Tax-exempt income

$8,246,812

$6,048,516

As of August 31, 2005, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income
   
$
253,074

Net unrealized appreciation

$
10,362,554

Capital loss carryforward

$
(2,128,310
)

At August 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $200,707,866. The net unrealized appreciation of investments for federal tax purposes was $10,362,554. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $10,387,378 and net unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $24,824.

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $2,128,310 which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire as follows:

Expiration Year
   
Expiration Amount
2008

$ 804,301
2009

$ 2,481
2011

$ 100,968
2012

$ 16,083
2013

$ 1,204,477

As a result of the tax-free transfer of assets from the Golden Oak Michigan Tax-Free Bond Fund, certain capital loss carryforwards listed above may be limited.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Adviser voluntarily waived $287,839 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of all Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.073% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Sales Charges

For the year ended August 31, 2005, Federated Securities Corp., the principal distributor, retained $22,067 of contingent deferred sales charges relating to redemptions of the Fund's Shares. See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), a subsidiary of Federated Investors, Inc., for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Under certain agreements, rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay Service Fees to FSSC and FSSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. This voluntary waiver can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC voluntarily waived $363,757 of its fee. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $55,700,000 and $55,600,000, respectively.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations for the year ended August 31, 2005, were as follows:

Purchases
   
$
44,235,834
Sales

$
46,049,973

7. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Since the Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers located in one state, it will be more susceptible to factors adversely affecting issuers of that state than would be a comparable tax-exempt mutual fund that invests nationally. In order to reduce the credit risk associated with such factors, at August 31, 2005, 36.6% of the securities in the portfolio of investments is backed by letters of credit or bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The largest percentage of investments insured by or supported (backed) by a letter of credit from any one institution or agency was 13.6% of total investments.

8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated (Funds) were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and will respond appropriately. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At August 31, 2005, 100% of the distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FEDERATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES INCOME TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED MICHIGAN INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL TRUST:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Federated Michigan Intermediate Municipal Trust (the "Fund"), a series of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust, as of August 31, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of August 31, 2005, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 18, 2005

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2004, the Trust comprised seven portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 44 investment companies (comprising 133 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Chairman and Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.; Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1998
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc. (marketing communications and technology) (prior to 9/1/00).

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue and Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Began Serving

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard J. Thomas
Birth Date: June 17, 1954
TREASURER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations: Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services.

Previous Positions:
Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; held various management positions within Funds Financial Services Division of Federated Investors, Inc.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE CHAIRMAN
Began serving: August 2002
Principal Occupations: Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions:
President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



J. Scott Albrecht
Birth Date: June 1, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations: J. Scott Albrecht is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Albrecht joined Federated in 1989. He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1997 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. He was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Albrecht is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Public Management from Carnegie Mellon University.



Board Review of Advisory Contract

As required by the Act, the Fund's Board has reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considers many factors, among the most material of which are: the Fund's investment objectives; the Adviser's management philosophy, personnel, processes, and investment and operating strategies; long-term performance; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the range and quality of services provided to the Fund and its shareholders by the Federated organization in addition to investment advisory services; and the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds.

In its decision to appoint or renew the Adviser, the Board is mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognizes that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's "selection" or approval of the Adviser must reflect the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund. The Board also considers the compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This includes fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. In this regard, the Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Adviser's service and fee. The Fund's Board is aware of these factors and is guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considers and weighs these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. In this regard, the Board requests and receives substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization. Federated provides much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnishes additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board's evaluation of an advisory contract is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, personnel, and processes; operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities; the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The evaluation process is evolutionary, reflecting continually developing considerations. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focuses on comparisons with other similar mutual funds (rather than non-mutual fund products or services) because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle already chosen by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group may be a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing on the Fund's investment program, which would in turn assist the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services are such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract.

The Board also receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses. Although the Board considers the profitability of the Federated organization as a whole, it does not evaluate, on a fund-by-fund basis, Federated's "profitability" and/or "costs" (which would include an assessment as to whether "economies of scale" would be realized if the fund were to grow to some sufficient size). In the Board's view, the cost of performing advisory services on a fund-specific basis is both difficult to estimate satisfactorily and a relatively minor consideration in its overall evaluation. Analyzing isolated funds would require constructed allocations of the costs of shared resources and operations based on artificial assumptions that are inconsistent with the existing relationships within a large and diversified family of funds that receive advisory and other services from the same organization. Although the Board is always eager to discover any genuine "economies of scale," its experience has been that such "economies" are likely to arise only when a fund grows dramatically, and becomes and remains very large in size. Even in these instances, purchase and redemption activity, as well as the presence of expense limitations (if any), may offset any perceived economies. As suggested above, the Board considers the information it receives about the Fund's performance and expenses as compared to an appropriate set of similar competing funds to be more relevant.

The Board bases its decision to approve an advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above are relevant to every Federated fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provide a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Michigan Intermediate Municipal Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 313923302

G01106-03 (10/05)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2005 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated New York Municipal Income Fund

A Portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

August 31, 2005

Class A Shares
Class B Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
BOARD REVIEW OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights - Class A Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

   
2001

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$10.65 $10.44 $10.59 $10.80 $10.29
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.45 0.46 0.44 0.49 1 0.52
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swap contracts

0.18


0.21


(0.15
)

(0.20
) 1

0.51

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.63


0.67


0.29


0.29


1.03

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.45
)

(0.46
)

(0.44
)

(0.50
)

(0.52
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$10.83


$10.65


$10.44


$10.59


$10.80

Total Return 2

6.03
%

6.51
%

2.81
%

2.79
%

10.29
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.60
%

0.61
%

0.76
%

0.91
%

0.91
%
Net investment income

4.19
%

4.31
%

4.19
%

4.72
% 1

4.97
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

1.08
%

1.07
%

1.16
%

1.10
%

1.39
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$26,307

$27,600

$26,273

$23,466

$23,011

Portfolio turnover

20
%

15
%

8
%

35
%

40
%

1 Effective September 1, 2001, the Fund adopted the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began accreting discount on debt securities. For the year ended August 31, 2002, this change had no effect on the net investment income per share, the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share, or the ratio of net investment income to average net assets. Per share, ratios and supplemental data for the periods prior to September 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights - Class B Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

   
Period
Ended
8/31/2003

1
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$10.65 $10.44 $10.65
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.37 0.38 0.36
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swap contracts

0.18


0.21


(0.21
)
   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.55


0.59


0.15

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.37
)

(0.38
)

(0.36
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$10.83


$10.65


$10.44

Total Return 2

5.21
%

5.72
%

1.42
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:









Net expenses

1.37
%

1.36
%

1.51
% 3
Net investment income

3.42
%

3.56
%

3.36
% 3
Expense waiver/reimbursement 4

0.83
%

0.82
%

0.91
% 3
Supplemental Data:









Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$22,304


$21,802


$19,000

Portfolio turnover

20
%

15
%

8
%

1 Reflects operations for the period from September 5, 2002 (date of initial public investment) to August 31, 2003.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 Computed on an annualized basis.

4 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2005.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


   
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/2005

   
Ending
Account Value
8/31/2005

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:






Class A Shares

$1,000

$1,029.70

$3.02
Class B Shares

$1,000

$1,025.60

$7.10
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Class A Shares

$1,000

$1,022.23

$3.01
Class B Shares

$1,000

$1,018.20

$7.07

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratios multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized expense ratios are as follows:

Class A Shares
   
0.59%
Class B Shares

1.39%

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

The fund's total return, based on net asset value, for the 12-month reporting period was 6.03% for Class A Shares and 5.21% for Class B Shares. The total return of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 1 the fund's benchmark index, was 5.31% during the 12-month reporting period. The fund's total return for the most recently completed fiscal year reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs and other expenses which were not reflected in the total return of the LBMB.

The fund's investment strategy focused on: (a) the effective duration of its portfolio (which indicates the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates); (b) the selection of securities with different maturities (expressed by a yield curve showing the relative yield of similar securities with different maturities); (c) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as sectors); and (d) the credit ratings of portfolio securities. 2 These were the most significant factors affecting the fund's performance relative to the LBMB.

The following discussion focuses on the performance of the fund's Class A Shares. The 6.03% total return of the Class A Shares for the reporting period consisted of 4.34% of tax-exempt dividends and 1.69% appreciation in the net asset value of the shares. 3

1 The LBMB is the broad-based securities market index for the fund. The LBMB is a broad market performance benchmark for the tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBMB, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of Baa, have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The LBMB includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Indexes are unmanaged, and it is not possible to invest directly in an index. Effective September 1, 2005, the Fund elected to change its benchmark index from the LBMB to the Lehman Brothers New York Municipal Bond Index. The LBNYMB is more representative of securities typically held by the Fund. The LBNYMB is an unmanaged index comprising investment-grade, tax-exempt, and fixed-rate bonds issued in the state of New York; all securities have long-term maturities (greater than two years) and are selected from issues larger than $50 million.

2 Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices.

3 Income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

MARKET OVERVIEW

During the reporting period, long-term interest rates remained low but showed some volatility as the bond market appeared to attempt to determine the extent of the strength of the U.S. economy and the Federal Reserve Board's (the "Fed") intentions concerning short-term interest rates. The ten-year Treasury note began the reporting period at 4.12%, reached a high of 4.64% on March 22, 2005, and then declined to 4.01% at the end of the reporting period. The continuation of the low interest rate environment resulted in investors pursuing lower rated credits because of the additional yield they offered. As a result, certain revenue bond sectors out performed the LBMB, such as hospital, industrial development and pollution control project bonds. High-yield, tax-exempt municipal debt (non-investment grade bonds rated "BB" and lower or unrated bonds of a comparable quality) provided strong total returns as investors were attracted to the significantly higher yield provided by these issues.

The Fed raised short-term rates eight times during the reporting period bringing the Federal Funds Target Rate to 3.50% by the end of the reporting period. This resulted in a significant flattening of the municipal yield curve with short-term interest rates rising and long-term interest rates actually declining (that is, while securities provided higher incremental income or yield as maturities became longer, the amount of the increase in incremental income was less or flattened).

Credit spreads, or the yield difference between the "AAA" municipal bonds and bonds of lower credit quality and similar maturity, decreased during the reporting period. This decrease in credit spreads appeared to be the result of both improving economic activity and the demand for securities with higher yields.

DURATION 4

As determined at the end of the reporting period, the fund's dollar-weighted average duration was 5.04 years. Duration management is a significant component of the fund's investment strategy. The shorter a fund's duration relative to an index, the less its net asset value will react as interest rates change. The fund's duration was maintained close to duration of the LBMB during the reporting period. The neutral duration of the fund did not have a significant impact on the fund's performance. The fund's use of forward settling municipal interest rate swaps and Treasury futures contracts, which did not perform well, to adjust portfolio duration had a negative impact on the fund's performance during the reporting period.

MATURITY

During the reporting period, the fund held a greater concentration of tax-exempt municipal bonds with maturities shorter than 20 years than the LBMB. Bonds with longer maturities provided better returns during the reporting period as the yield curve flattened, and the yields on bonds with longer maturities declined while the yield on bonds with shorter maturities increased. Even though the fund increased its holdings of tax-exempt municipal bonds with 20- to 30-year maturities, the fund remained underweighted relative to the LBMB with respect to longer maturity bonds. This underweight position had a negative impact on the fund's performance relative to the LBMB because the fund did not share in the better returns provided by longer maturity bonds to the same extent as the LBMB.

4 Duration is a measure of a security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations.

SECTOR

During the reporting period, the fund allocated more of its portfolio to securities issued by hospitals, industrial development projects and higher education institutions. The fund also allocated less of the portfolio to pre-refunded, tax-exempt municipal bonds (bonds for which the principal and interest payments are secured or guaranteed by cash or U.S. Treasury securities held in an escrow account). These allocations helped the fund's performance due to the greater price appreciation that occurred in the overweighted sectors and the smaller increase in the price of pre-refunded bonds as compared to other sectors. The fund also had substantial out performance from its exposure to tobacco-related debt and bonds backed by British Airways.

CREDIT QUALITY

The fund's overweight position, relative to the LBMB, in "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt benefited the fund's performance as credit spreads became tighter to a greater extent for "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt than for other investment grade rated ("AAA," "AA," "A," or comparable quality) debt (meaning that the yield on the "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt improved to a greater extent than for other investment grade rated (or comparable quality) debt). 5

5 Investment grade securities are securities that are rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Non-investment grade securities are securities that are not rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT - CLASS A SHARES

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 1 in Federated New York Municipal Income Fund (Class A Shares) (the "Fund") from August 31, 1995 to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers New York Municipal Bond Index (LBNYMB), 2,3 the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 2,3 and the Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Average (LNYMDFA). 2

Average Annual Total Return 4 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   

1 Year

1.28%
5 Years

4.69%
10 Years

5.17%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum sales charge of 4.50%.

1 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting the maximum sales charge of 4.50% ($10,000 investment minus $450 sales charge = $9,550). The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBNYMB, LBMB, and LNYMDFA have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the indexes and the average. The indexes are unmanaged, and, unlike the Fund, are not affected by cashflows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or average.

2 The LBNYMB is an unmanaged index comprising investment-grade, tax-exempt, and fixed-rate bonds issued in the state of New York; all securities have long-term maturities (greater than two years) and are selected from issues larger than $50 million. The LBMB is an unmanaged index comprising bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The index includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. The LBNYMB and LBMB are not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance. Effective September 1, 2005, the Fund elected to change its benchmark index from the LBMB to the LBNYMB. The LBNYMB is more representative of securities typically held by the Fund. The LNYMDFA represents the average of the total returns reported by all of the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling in the category indicated, and is not adjusted to reflect any sales charges. However, these total returns are reported net of expenses or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a fund's performance.

3 The Fund's investment adviser has elected to change the Fund's benchmark index from the LBMB to the LBNYMB. The LBNYMB is more representative of the securities typically held by the Fund. The LBNYMB's date of inception was September 1, 1996.

4 Total return quoted reflects all applicable sales charges.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT - CLASS B SHARES

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 1 in Federated New York Municipal Income Fund (Class B Shares) (the "Fund") from September 5, 2002 (start of performance) to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers New York Municipal Bond Index (LBNYMB), 2,3 the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 2,3 and the Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Average (LNYMDFA). 2

Average Annual Total Return 4 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   

1 Year

(0.29)%
Start of Performance (9/5/2002)

2.86%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum contingent deferred sales charge of 5.50% as applicable.

1 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund. The maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 5.50% on any redemption less than one year from the purchase date. The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBNYMB, LBMB, and LNYMDFA have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the index and average. The indexes are unmanaged, and, unlike the Fund, are not affected by cashflows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or average.

2 The LBNYMB is an unmanaged index comprising investment-grade, tax-exempt, and fixed-rate bonds issued in the state of New York; all securities have long-term maturities (greater than two years) and are selected from issues larger than $50 million. The LBMB is an unmanaged index comprising bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The index includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. The LBNYMB and LBMB are not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance. The LNYMDFA represents the average of the total returns reported by all of the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling in the category indicated, and is not adjusted to reflect any sales charges. However, these total returns are reported net of expenses or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a fund's performance.

3 The Fund's investment adviser has elected to change the Fund's benchmark index from the LBMB to the LBNYMB. The LBNYMB is more representative of the securities typically held by the Fund. The LBNYMB's date of inception was September 1, 1996.

4 Total return quoted reflects all applicable contingent deferred sales charges.

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400.

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At August 31, 2005, the Fund's credit-quality ratings composition 1 was as follows:

S&P Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

Moody's Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

AAA
   
27.1%
    Aaa
   
22.9%
AA

22.0%
Aa

11.0%
A

17.4%
A

19.0%
BBB

8.4%
Baa

12.7%
BB

5.2%
Ba

3.1%
B

0.0%
B

1.2%
Not Rated by S&P

19.9%
Not Rated by Moody's

30.1%
   TOTAL

100.0%
   TOTAL

100.0%

1 These tables depict the long-term, credit-quality ratings assigned to the Fund's portfolio holdings by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), each of which is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). These credit-quality ratings are shown without regard to gradations within a given rating category. For example, securities rated "A-" have been included in the "A" rated category. Rated securities that have been prerefunded, but not rated again by the NRSRO, have been included in the "Not rated by..." category.

Rated securities include a security with an obligor and/or credit enhancer that has received a rating from an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt obligations that is comparable in priority and security with the security held by the Fund. Credit-quality ratings are an assessment of the risk that a security will default in payment and do not address other risks presented by the security. Please see the descriptions of credit-quality ratings in the Fund's Statement of Additional Information.

Holdings that are rated only by a different NRSRO than the one identified have been included in the "Not rated by..." category. Of the portfolio's total investments, 8.5% do not have long-term ratings by either of these NRSROs.

2 Percentages are based on total investments, which may differ from the Fund's total net assets used in computing the percentages in the Portfolio of Investments which follows.

Portfolio of Investments

August 31, 2005

Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value

MUNICIPAL BONDS--98.3%   
New York--94.7%
$ 500,000 Albany County, NY IDA, IDRBs (Series 2004A), 5.375% (Albany College of Pharmacy), 12/1/2024
BBB-/NR $ 524,280
500,000 Albany, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 5.75% (Albany Law School)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.83%), 10/1/2030
AA/NR 547,205
500,000 Amherst, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2000B), 5.75% (UBF Faculty-Student Housing Corp.)/ (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.82%), 8/1/2025
AAA/Aaa 561,485
500,000 Broome County, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2004B), 5.00% (University Plaza-Phase II)/(American Capital Access INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.05%), 8/1/2025
A/NR 516,505
295,000 Dutchess County, NY IDA, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 7.50% (St. Francis Hospital and Health Centers), 3/1/2029
NR 325,355
785,000 Dutchess County, NY IDA, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Marist College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.15%), 7/1/2020
NR/Baa1 824,635
500,000 East Rochester, NY Housing Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.375% (Rochester St. Mary's Residence Facility LLC)/(GNMA GTD), 12/20/2022
AAA/NR 543,025
500,000 Essex County, NY IDA, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.80% (International Paper Co.), 12/1/2019
BBB/Baa2 511,575
500,000 Hempstead Town, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Hofstra University)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.10%), 7/1/2033
A/Baa1 522,025
220,000 Islip, NY Resource Recovery Agency, Resource Recovery Revenue Bonds (Series 2001E), 5.75% (FSA INS), 7/1/2023
AAA/Aaa 247,762
500,000 Livingston County, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 6.00% (Nicholas H. Noyes Memorial Hospital Civic Facility), 7/1/2030
BB/NR 526,230
1,000,000 Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System General Revenue Bonds (Series 2003B), 5.25%, 12/1/2014
A-/A3 1,116,110
750,000 2 Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 5.50% (Escrowed In Treasuries COL), 12/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 851,850
500,000 Madison County, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.00% (Colgate University), 7/1/2023
AA-/Aa3 533,140
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value

MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
New York--continued
$ 320,000 Madison County, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (Morrisville State College Foundation)/ (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS), 6/1/2028
AAA/NR $ 343,808
750,000 Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (AMBAC INS), 11/15/2018
AAA/Aaa 846,540
500,000 Monroe County, NY IDA, Civic Center Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (St. John Fisher College)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.25%), 6/1/2026
AA/NR 536,410
500,000 Monroe County, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bond, 5.25% (Nazareth College)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 10/1/2021
NR/Aaa 548,720
190,000 Nassau County, NY IDA, Civic Facility Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2001B), 5.875% (North Shore-Long Island Jewish Obligated Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.92%), 11/1/2011
NR/A3 208,417
500,000 Nassau County, NY IDA, IDRBs (Series 2003A), 5.25% (Keyspan-Glenwood Energy Center LLC)/(KeySpan Corp. GTD), 6/1/2027
A/A3 525,440
625,000 New York City, NY Health and Hospitals Corp., Health System Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (FSA INS), 2/15/2019
AAA/Aaa 695,325
500,000 New York City, NY IDA, (Series 1995) Civic Facility Revenue Bonds, 6.30% (College of New Rochelle)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.45%), 9/1/2015
NR/Baa2 510,835
250,000 New York City, NY IDA, Civic Facilities Revenue Bonds, 5.375% (New York University)/(AMBAC INS), 7/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 275,985
400,000 New York City, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 6.375% (Staten Island University Hospital), 7/1/2031
NR/B2 400,856
300,000 New York City, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.375% (Lycee Francais de New York Project)/(American Capital Access INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.43%), 6/1/2023
A/NR 315,495
200,000 New York City, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2002C), 6.45% (Staten Island University Hospital), 7/1/2032
NR/B2 200,524
1,000,000 New York City, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), 5.00% (Roundabout Theatre Co., Inc.)/ (American Capital Access INS), 10/1/2023
A/NR 1,035,240
275,000 New York City, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds, 7.00% (Mt. St. Vincent College, NY), 5/1/2008
NR 278,124
400,000 3 New York City, NY IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.25% (7 World Trade Center LLC), 3/1/2015
NR 425,460
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value

MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
New York--continued
$ 500,000 New York City, NY IDA, Special Airport Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 5.50% (Airis JFK I LLC Project at JFK International)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.65%), 7/1/2028
BBB-/Baa3 $ 509,110
500,000 New York City, NY IDA, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (British Airways), 12/1/2032
BB-/Ba2 451,850
500,000 New York City, NY Municipal Water Finance Authority, Crossover Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2002B), 5.00% (Original Issue Yield: 5.14%), 6/15/2026
AA+/Aa2 523,345
500,000 New York City, NY Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Secured Bonds (2003 Series C), 5.25% (AMBAC INS), 8/1/2022
AAA/Aaa 548,815
500,000 New York City, NY, UT GO Bonds (Fiscal 2005 Series C), 5.25%, 8/15/2025
A+/A1 543,780
515,000 New York City, NY, UT GO Bonds (Series 2002C), 5.50%, 3/15/2015
A+/A1 564,543
500,000 New York City, NY, UT GO Bonds (Series 2003J), 5.50%, 6/1/2023
A+/A1 549,700
500,000 New York Counties Tobacco Trust III, Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Original Issue Yield: 5.93%), 6/1/2033
BBB/Ba1 529,235
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Court Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.375% (New York City, NY), 5/15/2023
A+/A2 564,250
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Education Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.125% (State University of New York)/(FGIC INS), 5/15/2021
AAA/Aaa 558,800
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, FHA-Insured Mortgage Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), 5.00% (Lutheran Medical Center)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 8/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 544,175
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, FHA-Insured Mortgage Nursing Home Revenue Bonds (Series 2001), 6.10% (Norwegian Christian Home and Health Center)/ (FHA and MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 8/1/2041
AAA/Aaa 568,555
1,000,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Insured Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 6.00% (Pratt Institute)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 7/1/2020
AA/NR 1,106,980
750,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (2003 Series 1), 5.00% (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 7/1/2022
AAA/Aaa 809,707
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1993A), 5.75% (City University of New York)/ (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.05%), 7/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 590,835
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value

MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
New York--continued
$ 500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 5.00% (Fordham University)/(FGIC INS), 7/1/2022
AAA/Aaa $ 538,595
750,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), 5.00% (Kateri Residence)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 7/1/2022
NR/Aa3 796,087
250,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), 5.375% (North Shore-Long Island Jewish Obligated Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.48%), 5/1/2023
NR/A3 266,455
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.50% (Brooklyn Law School)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 7/1/2018
AA/NR 554,770
750,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.50% (Winthrop-University Hospital Association)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.70%), 7/1/2023
NR/Baa1 802,837
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004), 5.25% (New York Methodist Hospital), 7/1/2024
NR/A3 537,425
250,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.25% (University of Rochester, NY), 7/1/2024
A+/A1 272,950
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (Rochester General Hospital)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 12/1/2025
AA/Aa3 533,435
400,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (Rochester General Hospital)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 12/1/2035
AA/Aa3 422,308
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C), 5.50% (Mt. Sinai NYU Health Obligated Group), 7/1/2026
BB/Ba1 510,660
250,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Manhattan College)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.30%), 7/1/2020
AA/NR 264,797
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.10% (Catholic Health Services of Long Island)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.19%), 7/1/2034
BBB/Baa1 516,920
500,000 New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Cansius College)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.28%), 7/1/2030
AAA/Aaa 544,725
400,000 New York State Environmental Facilities Corp. State Clean Water and Drinking Water, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002B), 5.00% (Original Issue Yield: 5.07%), 6/15/2022
AAA/Aaa 431,692
500,000 New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25% (New York State Personal Income Tax Revenue Bond Fund)/(FGIC INS), 1/1/2021
AAA/Aaa 551,715
500,000 New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 4.45% TOBs (Waste Management, Inc.), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2009
BBB/NR 510,395
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value

MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
New York--continued
$ 500,000 New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, 6.10% (Occidental Petroleum Corp.)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.214%), 11/1/2030
A-/A3 $ 511,265
900,000 New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., Water Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series A), 6.30% (Spring Valley Water Co., NY)/(AMBAC INS), 8/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 940,194
500,000 New York State HFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.25% (New York State Personal Income Tax Revenue Bond Fund), 3/15/2021
AA/A1 541,845
110,000 New York State HFA, Service Contract Obligation Revenue Bonds (Series 1995 A), 6.375% (U.S. Treasury PRF 9/15/05 @ 102), 9/15/2015
AA-/A2 112,355
5,000 New York State HFA, Service Contract Obligation Revenue Bonds (Series 1995 A), 6.375%, 9/15/2015
AA-/A2 5,113
840,000 New York State Medical Care Facilities Finance Agency, FHA-Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.50% (Lockport Memorial Hospital, NY)/(FHA GTD), 2/15/2035
AA/Aa2 858,950
500,000 New York State Power Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.00%, 11/15/2021
AA-/Aa2 540,430
1,000,000 3 New York State Thruway Authority, Drivers (Series 1069), 12.27% (New York State Thruway Authority-Highway & Bridge Trust Fund)/(AMBAC INS), 4/1/2013
NR 1,353,470
1,000,000 New York State Thruway Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005B), 5.00% (New York State Thruway Authority-Highway & Bridge Trust Fund)/(AMBAC INS), 4/1/2025
AAA/NR 1,084,440
500,000 New York State Urban Development Corp., Correctional & Youth Facilities Service Contract Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% TOBs (New York State), Mandatory Tender 1/1/2011
AA-/A2 547,350
750,000 New York State Urban Development Corp., Revenue Bonds (Series 2003B), 5.25% (New York State Personal Income Tax Revenue Bond Fund), 3/15/2019
AA/A1 843,008
500,000 New York State Urban Development Corp., Subordinated Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.125% (Empire State Development Corp.), 1/1/2022
A/A2 538,975
500,000 Niagara County, NY IDA, Solid Waste Disposal Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2001D), 5.55% TOBs (American Ref-Fuel Co. of Niagara, L.P. Facility), Mandatory Tender 11/15/2015
BB+/Baa3 532,325
400,000 Niagara Falls, NY City School District, COPs (Series 1998), 5.375% (U.S. Treasury PRF 6/15/08 @ 101)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.42%), 6/15/2028
BBB-/Baa3 429,556
500,000 Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Revenue Bonds (128th Series), 5.00% (FSA INS), 11/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 545,400
500,000 Schenectady, NY, Bond Anticipation Renewal Notes (Series 2005), 5.25% BANs, 5/26/2006
NR 499,325
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value

MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
New York--continued
$ 250,000 Schenectady, NY, (Series 2004), 5.90% TANs, 12/30/2005
NR $ 249,743
500,000 Suffolk County, NY IDA, IDRBs (Series 1998), 5.50% (Nissequogue Cogen Partners Facility)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.528%), 1/1/2023
NR 505,225
500,000 Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NY, Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A-1), 5.50% (New York State), 6/1/2019
AA-/A2 559,950
440,000 Tompkins County, NY IDA, Continuing Care Retirement Community Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.375% (Kendal at Ithaca, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.50%), 7/1/2018
BBB/NR 451,282
500,000 United Nations, NY Development Corp., Senior Lien Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.25%, 7/1/2022
NR/A3 520,385
300,000 Utica, NY Industrial Development Agency Civic Facility, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 6.875% (Utica College), 12/1/2024
NR 322,599
500,000 Westchester County, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2001), 5.20% (Windward School)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.21%), 10/1/2021
AA/NR 531,515
175,000 Westchester County, NY IDA, Continuing Care Retirement Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 6.375% (Kendal on Hudson)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.55%), 1/1/2024
NR 187,885
500,000 Yonkers, NY IDA, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2001B), 7.125% (St. John's Riverside Hospital), 7/1/2031

BB/NR


522,955

   TOTAL




46,053,347

Puerto Rico--3.6%
500,000 3 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Drivers (Series 266), 8.2089% (FSA INS), 7/1/2015
AAA/NR 662,875
500,000 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Transportation Revenue Bonds (Series G), 5.00% (Original Issue Yield: 5.10%), 7/1/2033
A/Baa2 524,055
135,000 Puerto Rico Public Building Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002D), 5.25% (Commonwealth of Puerto Rico GTD)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.40%), 7/1/2027
BBB/Baa2 144,495
365,000 Puerto Rico Public Building Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002D), 5.25% (U.S. Treasury PRF 7/1/12 @ 100)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.40%), 7/1/2027

A-/Baa2


405,026

   TOTAL




1,736,451

   TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (IDENTIFIED COST $45,564,115)




47,789,798

Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPAL --2.5%
New York--2.5%
$ 1,200,000 New York City, NY IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series 2004 B) Daily VRDNs (One Bryant Park LLC)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) INV)/(Bank of America N.A. and Bank of New York LOCs)
(AT AMORTIZED COST)

A-1+/VMIG1

$
1,200,000

   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--100.8%
(IDENTIFIED COST $46,764,115) 4





48,989,798

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES--(0.8)%




(379,223
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%



$
48,610,575

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 9.6% of the Fund's portfolio as calculated based upon total portfolio market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 Current credit ratings are unaudited.

2 Pledged as collateral to ensure the Fund is able to satisfy the obligations of its outstanding short futures contracts.

3 Denotes a restricted security, including securities purchased under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities, all of which have been deemed liquid by criteria approved by the Fund's Board of Trustees, unless registered under the Act or exempted from registration, may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. At August 31, 2005, these securities amounted to $2,441,805 which represents 5.0% of total net assets.

4 The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $46,760,755.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at August 31, 2005.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
BANs --Bond Anticipation Notes
COL --Collateralized
COPs --Certificates of Participation
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHA --Federal Housing Administration
FSA --Financial Security Assurance
GNMA --Government National Mortgage Association
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDRBs --Industrial Development Revenue Bonds
INS --Insured
INV --Investment Agreement
LOC(s) --Letter(s) of Credit
PRF --Prerefunded
TANs --Tax Anticipation Notes
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
UT --Unlimited Tax
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

August 31, 2005

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at value (identified cost $46,764,115)
$ 48,989,798
Cash
28,245
Income receivable
528,559
Receivable for investments sold
1,669,399
Receivable for shares sold






4,390

   TOTAL ASSETS






51,220,391

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 2,424,490
Payable for shares redeemed
32,736
Income distribution payable
68,919
Payable for daily variation margin
12,500
Net payable for swap contracts
19,451
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
292
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
14,146
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
9,694
Accrued expenses


27,588





   TOTAL LIABILITIES






2,609,816

Net assets for 4,486,503 shares outstanding





$
48,610,575

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 47,384,481
Net unrealized appreciation of investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts
2,181,523
Accumulated net realized loss on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts
(955,404 )
Accumulated net investment income (loss)






(25
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS





$
48,610,575

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share
Class A Shares:
Net asset value per share ($26,306,772 ÷ 2,427,950 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized






$10.83

Offering price per share (100/95.50 of $10.83) 1






$11.34

Redemption proceeds per share






$10.83

Class B Shares:
Net asset value per share ($22,303,803 ÷ 2,058,553 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized






$10.83

Offering price per share






$10.83

Redemption proceeds per share (94.50/100 of $10.83) 1






$10.23

1 See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended August 31, 2005

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
2,324,013

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 194,048
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
190,000
Custodian fees
4,109
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
54,188
Directors'/Trustees' fees
2,035
Auditing fees
18,606
Legal fees
6,962
Portfolio accounting fees
64,871
Distribution services fee--Class A Shares (Note 5)
65,596
Distribution services fee--Class B Shares (Note 5)
167,053
Shareholder services fee--Class A Shares (Note 5)
59,291
Shareholder services fee--Class B Shares (Note 5)
55,684
Share registration costs
25,375
Printing and postage
13,468
Insurance premiums
8,273
Miscellaneous






1,267





   TOTAL EXPENSES






930,826





Waivers and Reimbursement (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (194,048 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(34,515 )
Waiver of distribution services fee--Class A Shares
(65,596 )
Reimbursement of other operating expenses


(172,709
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS AND REIMBURSEMENT






(466,868
)




Net expenses










463,958

Net investment income










1,860,055

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments, Futures Contracts and Swap Contracts:
Net realized gain on investments
115,177
Net realized loss on futures contracts
(81,943 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments
867,005
Net change in unrealized depreciation on futures contracts
(24,709 )
Net change in unrealized depreciation on swaps contract










(19,451
)
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts










856,079

Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
2,716,134

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended August 31
   

2005

   

2004

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 1,860,055 $ 1,947,349
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts
33,234 (331,321 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts


822,845



1,191,054

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


2,716,134



2,807,082

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Class A Shares
(1,099,346 ) (1,187,212 )
Class B Shares


(760,234
)


(759,679
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(1,859,580
)


(1,946,891
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
5,728,660 10,782,409
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
943,075 978,809
Cost of shares redeemed


(8,319,702
)


(8,891,672
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(1,647,967
)


2,869,546

Change in net assets


(791,413
)


3,729,737

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


49,401,988



45,672,251

End of period (including accumulated net investment income (loss) of $(25) and $(24), respectively)

$
48,610,575


$
49,401,988

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

August 31, 2005

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of seven portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated New York Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a non-diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal regular income tax (federal regular income tax does not include the federal AMT) and the personal income taxes imposed by the state of New York and New York municipalities. Interest income from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal AMT for individuals and corporations. The Fund offers two classes of shares: Class A Shares and Class B Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

Municipal bonds are valued by an independent pricing service, taking into consideration yield, liquidity, risk, credit-quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, and any other factors or market data the pricing service deems relevant. The Fund generally values short-term securities according to prices furnished by an independent pricing service, except that short-term securities with remaining maturities of less than 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at amortized cost. Prices furnished by an independent pricing service are intended to be indicative of the mean between the bid and asked prices currently offered to institutional investors for the securities. Securities for which no quotations are readily available are valued at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the "Trustees").

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Dividend income and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized/accreted for financial statement purposes.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Swap Contracts

The Fund may enter into swap contracts. A swap is an exchange of cash payments between the Fund and another party, which is based on a specific financial index. The value of the swap is adjusted daily and the change in value is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When a swap contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. The swap contracts entered into by the Fund are on a forward settling basis. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had no realized gain (loss) on swap contracts.

Risks may arise upon entering into these agreements from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contract and from unanticipated changes in the value of the financial index on which the swap agreement is based. The Fund uses swaps for hedging purposes to reduce its exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had the following open swap contracts:

Description
   
Expiration
   
Notional
Principal
Amount

   
Swap Contract
Fixed Rate

   
Current
Market
Fixed Rate

   
Unrealized
Depreciation

BMA Swap 10 Year

3/1/2016

$4,000,000

3.582% Fixed

3.482%

$(19,451)

Futures Contracts

The Fund periodically may sell bond interest rate futures contracts to manage duration and to potentially reduce transaction costs. Upon entering into a bond interest rate futures contract with a broker, the Fund is required to deposit in a segregated account a specified amount of cash or U.S. government securities. Futures contracts are valued daily and unrealized gains or losses are recorded in a "variation margin" account. Daily, the Fund receives from or pays to the broker a specified amount of cash based upon changes in the variation margin account. When a contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. Futures contracts have market risks, including the risk that the change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had net realized losses on future contracts of $81,943.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had the following open futures contract:

Expiration Date
   
Contracts to Deliver
   
Position
   
Unrealized
Depreciation

December 2005

25 U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note Futures

Short

$(24,709)

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from such registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund's restricted securities are valued at the price provided by dealers in the secondary market or, if no market prices are available, at the fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Trustees.

Additional information on restricted securities, excluding securities purchased under Rule 144A that have been deemed liquid by the Trustees, held at August 31, 2005, is as follows:

Security
   
Acquisition Date
   
Acquisition Cost
New York City, NY IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.25% (7 World Trade Center LLC), 3/1/2015

3/15/2005

$400,000

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Year Ended August 31
   
2005
   
2004
Class A Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
322,792 $ 3,473,791 469,545 $ 4,997,940
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
41,751 448,512 43,270 459,837
Shares redeemed

(529,239
)


(5,682,587
)

(475,773
)


(5,041,882
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS A SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(164,696
)

$
(1,760,284
)

37,042


$
415,895

Year Ended August 31
   
2005
   
2004
Class B Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
209,632 $ 2,254,869 542,789 $ 5,784,469
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
46,046 494,563 48,825 518,972
Shares redeemed

(245,170
)


(2,637,115
)

(363,901
)


(3,849,790
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS B SHARE TRANSACTIONS

10,508


$
112,317


227,713


$
2,453,651

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(154,188
)

$
(1,647,967
)

264,755


$
2,869,546

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are due in part to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

For the year ended August 31, 2005, permanent differences identified and reclassified among the components of net assets were as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Accumulated
Net Investment
Income (Loss)

   
Accumulated
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)

$(476)

$476

Net investment income (loss), net realized gains (losses), and net assets were not affected by this reclassification.

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended August 31, 2005 and August 31, 2004, was as follows:


   
2005
   
2004
Tax-exempt income

$1,859,580

$1,946,891

As of August 31, 2005, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income
   
$
68,892
Unrealized appreciation

$
2,184,883
Capital loss carryforward

$
983,473

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable to the amortization/accretion tax elections on fixed-income securities.

At August 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $46,760,755. The net unrealized appreciation of investments for federal tax purposes was $2,229,043, excluding any unrealized depreciation from futures and swap contracts. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $2,278,382 and net unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $49,339.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $983,473 which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire as follows:

Expiration Year
   
Expiration Amount
2008

$288,795
2011

$371,903
2012

$ 4,752
2013

$318,023

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee and/or reimburse certain operating expenses of the Fund. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Adviser voluntarily waived $194,048 of its fee, and reimbursed $172,709 of other operating expenses.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of all Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.321% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares and Class B Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses according to the following schedule annually, to compensate FSC:

Share Class Name
   
Percentage of Average
Daily Net Assets of Class

Class A Shares

0.25%
Class B Shares

0.75%

FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC voluntarily waived $65,596 of its fee. Rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay fees to FSC and FSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

Sales Charges

For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC retained $11,078 in sales charges from the sale of Class A Shares. See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Services Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares and Class B Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), a subsidiary of Federated Investors, Inc., for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Under certain agreements, rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay Service Fees to FSSC and FSSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. This voluntary waiver can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $17,950,000 and $17,550,000, respectively.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations, for the year ended August 31, 2005, were as follows:

Purchases
   
$
9,695,452
Sales

$
14,425,874

7. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Since the Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers located in one state, it will be more susceptible to factors adversely affecting issuers of that state than would be a comparable tax-exempt mutual fund that invests nationally. In order to reduce the credit risk associated with such factors, at August 31, 2005, 44.3% of the securities in the portfolio of investments is backed by letters of credit or bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The largest percentage of investments insured by or supported (backed) by a letter of credit from any one institution or agency was 11.5% of total investments.

8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated (Funds) were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and will respond appropriately. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At August 31, 2005, 100% of the distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FEDERATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES INCOME TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED NEW YORK MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Federated New York Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust, as of August 31, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of August 31, 2005, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 18, 2005

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2004, the Trust comprised seven portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 44 investment companies (comprising 133 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Chairman and Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.; Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1998
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc. (marketing communications and technology) (prior to 9/1/00).

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue and Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Began Serving

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.


Richard J. Thomas
Birth Date: June 17, 1954
TREASURER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; held various management positions within Funds Financial Services Division of Federated Investors, Inc.


Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE CHAIRMAN
Began serving: August 2002
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.


Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



J. Scott Albrecht
Birth Date: June 1, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: November 1998
J. Scott Albrecht has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since March 1995. He is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Albrecht joined Federated in 1989. He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1997 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. He was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Albrecht is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Public Management from Carnegie Mellon University.



Board Review of Advisory Contract

As required by the Act, the Fund's Board has reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considers many factors, among the most material of which are: the Fund's investment objectives; the Adviser's management philosophy, personnel, processes, and investment and operating strategies; long-term performance; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the range and quality of services provided to the Fund and its shareholders by the Federated organization in addition to investment advisory services; and the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds.

In its decision to appoint or renew the Adviser, the Board is mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognizes that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's "selection" or approval of the Adviser must reflect the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund. The Board also considers the compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This includes fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. In this regard, the Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Adviser's service and fee. The Fund's Board is aware of these factors and is guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considers and weighs these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. In this regard, the Board requests and receives substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization. Federated provides much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnishes additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board's evaluation of an advisory contract is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, personnel, and processes; operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities; the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The evaluation process is evolutionary, reflecting continually developing considerations. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focuses on comparisons with other similar mutual funds (rather than non-mutual fund products or services) because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle already chosen by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group may be a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing on the Fund's investment program, which would in turn assist the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services are such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract.

The Board also receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses. Although the Board considers the profitability of the Federated organization as a whole, it does not evaluate, on a fund-by-fund basis, Federated's "profitability" and/or "costs" (which would include an assessment as to whether "economies of scale" would be realized if the fund were to grow to some sufficient size). In the Board's view, the cost of performing advisory services on a fund-specific basis is both difficult to estimate satisfactorily and a relatively minor consideration in its overall evaluation. Analyzing isolated funds would require constructed allocations of the costs of shared resources and operations based on artificial assumptions that are inconsistent with the existing relationships within a large and diversified family of funds that receive advisory and other services from the same organization. Although the Board is always eager to discover any genuine "economies of scale," its experience has been that such "economies" are likely to arise only when a fund grows dramatically, and becomes and remains very large in size. Even in these instances, purchase and redemption activity, as well as the presence of expense limitations (if any), may offset any perceived economies. As suggested above, the Board considers the information it receives about the Fund's performance and expenses as compared to an appropriate set of similar competing funds to be more relevant.

The Board bases its decision to approve an advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above are relevant to every Federated fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provide a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated New York Municipal Income Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 313923401
Cusip 313923880

28992 (10/05)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2005 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated North Carolina Municipal Income Fund

A Portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

August 31, 2005

Class A Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
BOARD REVIEW OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

   
2001

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$11.05 $10.92 $11.07 $10.99 $10.45
Income from Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.47 0.48 0.48 0.50 1 0.50
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swap contracts

0.02


0.13



(0.15
)

0.08
1


0.54

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.49


0.61


0.33


0.58


1.04

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.47
)

(0.48
)

(0.48
)

(0.50
)

(0.50
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$11.07


$11.05


$10.92


$11.07


$10.99

Total Return 2

4.57
%

5.61
%

2.93
%

5.48
%

10.23
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.78
%

0.79
%

0.79
%

0.79
%

0.79
%
Net investment income

4.29
%

4.26
%

4.22
%

4.62
% 1

4.71
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.63
%

0.56
%

0.49
%

0.61
%

0.68
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$62,000


$56,289


$82,430


$55,261


$47,235

Portfolio turnover

12
%

16
%

16
%

21
%

28
%

1 Effective September 1, 2001, the Fund adopted the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began accreting discount/amortizing premium on long-term debt securities. For the year ended August 31, 2002, this change had no effect on the net investment income per share or net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share, but increased the ratio of net investment income to average net assets from 4.61% to 4.62%. Per share, ratios and supplemental data for the periods prior to September 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2005.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


   
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/2005

   
Ending
Account Value
8/31/2005

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,021.70

$3.92
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,021.32

$3.92

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio of 0.77% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

The Fund's total return, based on net asset value, for the 12-month reporting period was 4.57% for Class A Shares. The total return of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 1 the fund's benchmark index, was 5.31% during the 12-month reporting period. The average total return of the Lipper North Carolina Municipal Debt Funds Average (Average), 2 a performance benchmark for the fund, was 4.06% over the 12-month reporting period. The Fund outperformed the Average in total return and income.

The Fund's investment strategy focused on: (a) purchasing intermediate to long-term, tax-exempt municipal bonds to capture the potential income advantages of such securities relative to bonds with shorter maturities due to the upward sloping yield curve (the yield curve shows the relative yield of similar securities with different maturities); (b) having a significant allocation of the bond portfolio in low investment grade and non-investment grade tax-exempt municipal bonds, or equivalents, to seek incremental return from the higher yields available in such securities; 3 (c) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as sectors); and (d) active adjustment of the fund's duration (which indicates the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates) through purchases of tax-exempt municipal bonds with relatively high coupons (or interest rate payments) and through tactical use of futures contracts. 4 These were the most significant factors affecting the fund's performance.

1 The LBMB is the broad-based securities market index for the fund. The LBMB is a broad market performance benchmark for the tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBMB, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of Baa, have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The LBMB includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Indexes are unmanaged, and it is not possible to invest directly in an index. The fund's total return reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs, and other expenses which were not reflected in the total return of LBMB.

2 Lipper figures represent the average of the total returns reports by all the mutual funds designated by Lipper Inc. as falling into the respective categories indicated. They do not reflect sales charges.

3 Investment grade securities are securities that are rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Non-investment grade securities are securities that are not rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.

4 Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices.

The following discussion focuses on the performance of the fund's Class A Shares. The 4.57% total return of the Class A Shares for the reporting period consisted of 4.39% of tax-exempt dividends and 0.18% appreciation in the net asset value of the shares. 5

MARKET OVERVIEW

During the reporting period, long term interest rates remained low but showed some volatility as the bond market appeared to attempt to determine the extent of the strength of the U.S. economy and the Federal Reserve Board's (the "Fed") intentions concerning short-term interest rates. The ten-year Treasury note began the reporting period at 4.12%, reached a high of 4.64% on March 22, 2005, and then declined to 4.01% at the end of the reporting period. The continuation of the low interest rate environment resulted in investors pursuing lower rated credits because of the additional yield they offered. As a result, certain revenue bond sectors outperformed the LBMB, such as hospital, industrial development and pollution control project bonds. High-yield, tax-exempt municipal debt (non-investment grade bonds rated "BB" and lower or unrated bonds of comparable quality) provided strong total returns as investors were attracted to the significantly higher yield provided by these issues.

The Fed raised short-term interest rates eight times during the reporting period bringing the Federal Funds Target Rate to 3.50% by the end of the reporting period. This resulted in a significant flattening of the municipal yield curve with short-term interest rates rising and long-term interest rates actually declining (that is, while securities provided higher incremental income or yield as maturities became longer, the amount of the increase in incremental income was less or flattened).

Credit spreads, or the yield difference between the "AAA" municipal bonds and bonds of lower credit quality and similar maturity, decreased during the reporting period. Credit spreads became tighter to a greater extent for "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt than for other investment grade rated ("AAA," "AA," "A" or comparable quality) debt (meaning that the yield on the "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt improved to a greater extent than for other investment grade rated (or comparable quality) debt).

YIELD CURVE AND MATURITY

Tax-exempt municipal bonds with longer maturities provided better returns during the reporting period as the yield curve flattened and the yields on bonds with longer maturities declined while the yield on bonds with shorter maturities increased.

The fund's concentration of bond holdings with maturities of 10 years or more added incremental return, and benefited fund performance, as such intermediate and long-term bonds provided greater income and higher total return.

5 Income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

CREDIT QUALITY

During the reporting period, non-investment grade (or high yield) tax-exempt municipal debt also performed well during the reporting period as the demand for non-investment grade tax-exempt municipal debt was great. The tightening of credit spreads between lower-quality bonds and high-quality bonds benefited the fund's performance because of the fund's holdings in low investment grade tax-exempt municipal bonds (bonds rated "BBB" or unrated bonds of comparable quality) and non-investment grade tax-exempt municipal bonds, which averaged approximately 16% of the fund's portfolio during the reporting period, contributed positively to the performance. Prices on such securities outperformed substantially during the period, which appeared to result from improving perceptions of credit quality and a heightened demand for such bonds.

SECTOR

During the reporting period, the fund allocated a sizable portion of its portfolio (more than 16%) to hospital and life care bonds. These sectors were among the strongest performing sectors during the reporting period and added significant incremental return. This positively impacted the fund's performance.

DURATION 6

As determined at the end of the reporting period, the fund's dollar-weighted average duration was 4.69 years. Duration management is a significant component of the fund's investment strategy. The fund's hedging strategy negatively affected the fund's performance. During most of the reporting period, in anticipation of rising interest rates, the fund hedged the portfolio (adjusted the duration shorter) using Treasury future contracts. The fund's use of these instruments, however, negatively affected the fund's performance since these instruments did not perform well because longer-term and intermediate-term municipal interest rates declined during the reporting period.

6 Duration is a measure of a security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT 1

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 2 in the Federated North Carolina Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund") from August 31, 1995 to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB) 3 and the Lipper North Carolina Municipal Debt Funds Average (LNCMDFA). 4

Average Annual Total Return 5 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   


1 Year

(0.13%
)
5 Years

4.77%

10 Years

4.80%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum sales charge of 4.50%.

1 Federated North Carolina Municipal Income Fund is the successor to CCB North Carolina Municipal Securities Fund. The quoted performance data includes performance of the CCB North Carolina Municipal Securities Fund for the period from August 31, 1995 to July 23, 1999, as adjusted to reflect the Fund's expenses. The CCB North Carolina Municipal Securities Fund was reorganized as a portfolio of the Trust on July 23, 1999.

2 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting the maximum sales charge of 4.50% ($10,000 investment minus $450 sales charge=$9,550). The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBMB and the LNCMDFA have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the index and the average. Indexes are unmanaged and, unlike the fund, are not affected by cash flows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or an average.

3 The LBMB is an unmanaged index comprising bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The index includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. It is not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance.

4 The LNCMDFA represents the average of the total returns reported by all of the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling into the respective category. These total returns are reported net of expenses and other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a mutual fund's performance.

5 Total return quoted reflects all applicable sales charges.

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400.

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At August 31, 2005, the Fund's credit-quality ratings composition 1 was as follows:

S&P Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

    Moody's Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

AAA
   
32.9%
Aaa
   
41.5%
AA

26.8%
Aa

21.5%
A

6.9%
A

4.3%
BBB

11.2%
Baa

10.8%
Not Rated by S&P

22.2%
Not Rated by Moody's

21.9%
   TOTAL

100.0%
   TOTAL

100.0%

1 These tables depict the long-term, credit-quality ratings assigned to the Fund's portfolio holdings by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), each of which is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). These credit-quality ratings are shown without regard to gradations within a given rating category. For example, securities rated "A-" have been included in the "A" rated category. Rated securities that have been prerefunded, but not rated again by the NRSRO, have been included in the "Not rated by..." category.

Rated securities include a security with an obligor and/or credit enhancer that has received a rating from an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt obligations that is comparable in priority and security with the security held by the Fund. Credit-quality ratings are an assessment of the risk that a security will default in payment and do not address other risks presented by the security. Please see the descriptions of credit-quality ratings in the Fund's Statement of Additional Information.

Holdings that are rated only by a different NRSRO than the one identified have been included in the "Not rated by..." category. Of the portfolio's total investments, 7.4% do not have long-term ratings by either of these NRSROs.

2 Percentages are based on total investments, which may differ from the Fund's total net assets used in computing the percentages in the Portfolio of Investments which follows.

Portfolio of Investments

August 31, 2005

Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--97.9%   
North Carolina--90.6%
$ 1,190,000 Appalachian State University, NC, Parking System Revenue Bonds, 5.625% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.65%), 7/15/2025
NR/Aaa $ 1,330,693
930,000 Asheville, NC Housing Authority, MFH Revenue Bonds, 5.625% TOBs (Oak Knoll Apartments Project)/(FNMA GTD) 9/1/2033
AAA/NR 990,012
1,220,000 Broad River, NC Water Authority, Water System Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.00% (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS), 6/1/2022
NR/Aaa 1,313,025
500,000 Broad River, NC Water Authority, Water System Revenue Bonds (Series 2000), 5.375% (U.S. Treasury PRF 6/1/2010 @101)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.55%), 6/1/2026
NR/Aaa 552,495
1,330,000 Cabarrus County, NC, COPs (Series 2002), 5.25%, 2/1/2018
AA-/Aa3 1,454,926
2,000,000 Charlotte, NC Airport, Revenue Bonds, (Series B), 5.875% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.95%), 7/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 2,176,260
1,000,000 Charlotte, NC, COPs, 5.50% (Charlotte Convention Facilities)/(U.S. Treasury PRF 12/1/2010 @101)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.70%), 12/1/2020
AA+/Aa2 1,118,860
1,000,000 Charlotte, NC, Refunding COPs, 5.00% (Charlotte Convention Facilities), 12/1/2025
AA+/Aa2 1,080,290
1,000,000 Columbus County, NC Industrial Facilities & PCFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 1996A), 5.85% (International Paper Co.), 12/1/2020
BBB/Baa2 1,036,700
1,000,000 Cumberland County, NC, UT GO Bonds, 5.70% (U.S. Treasury PRF 3/1/2010 @102)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.78%), 3/1/2017
AA-/Aa3 1,123,230
1,000,000 Fayetteville, NC Public Works Commission, Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.70% (U.S. Treasury PRF 3/1/2010 @101)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.79%), 3/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,114,540
1,000,000 Forsyth County, NC, COPs, 5.375% (U.S. Treasury PRF 10/1/2011 @101), 10/1/2022
AA+/Aa1 1,122,570
500,000 Gaston County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, Exempt Facilities Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (National Gypsum Co.), 8/1/2035
NR 523,775
900,000 Gastonia, NC Combined Utilities System, Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds, 5.625% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 5/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 995,643
750,000 Harnett County, NC, COPs, 5.50% (FSA INS), 12/1/2015
AAA/Aaa 833,490
1,000,000 Haywood County, NC Industrial Facilities & PCFA, Revenue Refunding Bonds, 6.40% (Champion International Corp.)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.42%), 11/1/2024
NR/Baa2 1,072,790
1,000,000 High Point, NC, Public Improvement UT GO Bonds (Series 2000B), 5.50% (Original Issue Yield: 5.67%), 6/1/2018
AA/Aa3 1,114,230
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
North Carolina--continued
$ 1,500,000 Martin County, NC IFA, (Series 1995) Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, 6.00% (Weyerhaeuser Co.), 11/1/2025
BBB/Baa2 $ 1,532,850
1,000,000 North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (Duke University), 10/1/2041
AA+/Aa1 1,061,370
500,000 North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power Supply Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series D), 5.125% (Original Issue Yield: 5.33%), 1/1/2026
BBB/Baa2 516,935
500,000 North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power System Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2003C), 5.375% (Original Issue Yield: 5.57%), 1/1/2017
BBB/Baa2 534,930
500,000 North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power System Revenue Bonds (Series 1999D), 6.70%, 1/1/2019
BBB/Baa2 560,685
865,000 North Carolina HFA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 5-A), 5.55%, 1/1/2019
AA/Aa2 895,950
770,000 North Carolina HFA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 6-A), 6.10%, 1/1/2018
AA/Aa2 805,020
300,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, FHA Insured Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), 5.375% (Betsy Johnson Regional Hospital)/(FSA INS), 10/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 335,265
500,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2001), 6.625% (Moravian Homes, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.00%), 4/1/2031
NR 533,990
500,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 6.25% (Arbor Acres Community)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.40%), 3/1/2027
NR 531,150
500,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 6.875% (Presbyterian Homes, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.00%), 10/1/2021
NR 538,955
500,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.00% (Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community), 11/1/2023
NR 521,440
1,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 6.25% (Stanley Memorial Hospital Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.40%), 10/1/2019
A-/NR 1,080,870
250,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25% (Union Regional Medical Center)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.33%), 1/1/2021
A/A2 263,668
200,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25% (Union Regional Medical Center)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.38%), 1/1/2022
A/A2 210,480
1,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.00% (Novant Health Obligated Group), 11/1/2017
AA-/Aa3 1,072,630
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
North Carolina--continued
$ 1,205,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.25% (Cleveland Community Healthcare)/(AMBAC INS), 7/1/2021
AAA/Aaa $ 1,321,728
1,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (Blue Ridge HealthCare System)/(FGIC INS), 1/1/2033
AAA/Aaa 1,059,600
1,230,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Hugh Chatham Memorial Hospital)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 10/1/2019
AA/NR 1,343,886
625,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Scotland Memorial Hospital)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.593%), 10/1/2019
AA/NR 670,825
400,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.80% (Arc of North Carolina Projects), 10/1/2034
NR/Baa1 416,908
1,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health System Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Mission Health, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.48%), 10/1/2026
AA/Aa3 1,065,800
1,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2000), 5.50% (Northeast Medical Center)/ (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.74%), 11/1/2025
AAA/Aaa 1,095,130
1,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.375% (Southeastern Regional Medical Center)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.48%), 6/1/2032
A/NR 1,047,310
1,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 6.125% (Southeastern Regional Medical Center)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.25%), 6/1/2019
A/A3 1,085,550
685,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Maria Parham Medical Center)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 10/1/2018
AA/NR 748,911
250,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Retirement Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 6.25% (Forest at Duke)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.35%), 9/1/2021
NR 268,648
500,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Retirement Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 6.375% (Givens Estates)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.50%), 7/1/2023
NR 537,035
550,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Retirement Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2004C), 6.00% (Cypress Glen)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.092%), 10/1/2033
NR 582,934
500,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Retirement Facilities First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.50% (United Methodist Retirement Homes)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.55%), 10/1/2035
NR 513,495
1,000,000 North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1, Electric Revenue Bonds (Series 1999B), 6.50% (Original Issue Yield: 6.73%), 1/1/2020
BBB+/A3 1,110,080
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
North Carolina--continued
$ 1,155,000 North Carolina Municipal Power Agency No. 1, Electric Revenue Bonds, 10.50% (Escrowed In Treasuries COL), 1/1/2010
AAA/#Aaa $ 1,351,477
1,200,000 Northern Hospital District of Surry County, NC, Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2001), 5.10% (Northern Hospital of Surry County)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.242%), 10/1/2021
AA/Aa3 1,258,488
1,080,000 Onslow, NC Water & Sewer Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS), 6/1/2025
AAA/Aaa 1,153,667
1,200,000 Piedmont Triad Airport Authority, NC, Airport Revenue Bonds (Series 1999A), 5.875% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.02%), 7/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,330,788
1,000,000 Pitt County, NC, COPs (Series 2000B), 5.50% (FSA INS)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.63%), 4/1/2025
AAA/Aaa 1,088,080
1,500,000 2 Pitt County, NC, Refunding Bonds, 5.25% (Pitt County Memorial Hospital)/(Escrowed In Treasuries COL)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 12/1/2021
NR/#Aaa 1,547,535
1,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (AMBAC INS), 5/1/2030
NR/Aaa 1,067,470
2,000,000 Randolph County, NC, COPs (Series 2000), 5.60% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.77%), 6/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 2,195,320
890,000 University of North Carolina System Pool, Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.25% (University of North Carolina)/ (AMBAC INS), 4/1/2021
AAA/Aaa 988,541
755,000 University of North Carolina System Pool, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (University of North Carolina)/(AMBAC INS), 4/1/2029
NR/Aaa 804,566
500,000 Wilmington, NC Water & Sewer System, Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.625% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.76%), 6/1/2018

NR/Aaa


553,925
   TOTAL




56,157,414
Puerto Rico--6.4%
1,500,000 3 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Drivers (Series 266), 8.2089% (FSA INS), 7/1/2015
AAA/NR 1,988,625
500,000 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Transportation Revenue Bonds (Series G), 5.00% (Original Issue Yield: 5.10%), 7/1/2033
A/Baa2 524,055
395,000 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Cogeneration Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.625% (AES Puerto Rico Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.65%), 6/1/2026
NR/Baa3 429,112
1,000,000 Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Commonwealth Appropriation Bonds (Series 2001E), 5.75% (U.S. Treasury PRF 2/1/2007 @100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.80%), 8/1/2030

BBB-/Aaa


1,039,790
   TOTAL




3,981,582
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Virgin Islands--0.9%
$ 500,000 University of the Virgin Islands, UT GO Bonds (Series A), 5.375% (Original Issue Yield: 5.43%), 12/1/2034

BBB/NR

$
533,625
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS
(IDENTIFIED COST $56,403,822)





60,672,621
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--1.1%
North Carolina--0.8%
500,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Moses H. Cone Memorial)

AA/NR


500,000
Puerto Rico--0.3%
200,000 Puerto Rico Government Development Bank (GDB) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Credit Suisse, Zurich LIQ)

AAA/Aaa


200,000
   TOTAL SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS
(AT AMORTIZED COST)





700,000
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--99.0%
(IDENTIFIED COST $57,103,822) 4





61,372,621
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--1.0%




626,955
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%



$
61,999,576

Securities subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 15.4% of the Fund's portfolio as calculated based upon total portfolio market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 Current credit ratings are unaudited.

2 Pledged as collateral to ensure the Fund is able to satisfy the obligations of its outstanding short futures contracts.

3 Denotes a restricted security, including securities purchased under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This security, which has been deemed liquid by criteria approved by the Fund's Board of Trustees, unless registered under the Act or exempted from registration, may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. At August 31, 2005, this security amounted to $1,988,625 which represents 3.2% of total net assets.

4 The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $57,100,309.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at August 31, 2005.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
COL --Collateralized
COPs --Certificates of Participation
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHA --Federal Housing Administration
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA --Financial Security Assurance
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
IFA --Industrial Finance Authority
INS --Insured
LIQ --Liquidity Agreement
MFH --Multifamily Housing
PCFA --Pollution Control Financing Authority
PRF --Prerefunded
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
UT --Unlimited Tax
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

August 31, 2005

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at value (identified cost $57,103,822)
$61,372,621
Cash
27,841
Income receivable
892,533
Receivable for investments sold
10,000
Receivable for shares sold





12,145

   TOTAL ASSETS





62,315,140

Liabilities:
Payable for shares redeemed
$ 194,752
Income distribution payable
74,951
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
437
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
10,653
Payable for shareholder services fees (Note 5)
9,724
Payable for daily variation margin
10,000
Accrued expenses


15,047




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





315,564

Net assets for 5,601,083 shares outstanding





$61,999,576

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$59,161,073
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and futures contracts
4,249,032
Accumulated net realized loss on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts
(1,410,520 )
Accumulated net investment income (loss)





(9
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS





$61,999,576

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
Net asset value per share ($61,999,576 ÷ 5,601,083 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$11.07

Offering price per share (100/95.50 of $11.07) 1





$11.59

Redemption proceeds per share





$11.07

1 See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended August 31, 2005

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
2,979,827

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 235,097
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
150,000
Custodian fees
4,263
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
39,487
Directors'/Trustees' fees
2,173
Auditing fees
20,238
Legal fees
8,203
Portfolio accounting fees
48,811
Distribution services fee (Note 5)
146,936
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
124,640
Share registration costs
21,000
Printing and postage
14,235
Insurance premiums
8,322
Miscellaneous






1,440





   TOTAL EXPENSES






824,845





Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (192,755 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(24,411 )
Waiver of distribution services fee
(146,936 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee


(4,489
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS






(368,591
)




Net expenses










456,254

Net investment income










2,523,573

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Futures Contracts:
Net realized gain on investments
20,265
Net realized loss on futures contracts
(198,551 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments
281,156
Net change in unrealized appreciation on futures contracts










(31,580
)
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and futures contracts










71,290

Change in net assets resulting from operations










$2,594,863

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended August 31
   

2005

   

2004

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 2,523,573 $ 2,877,050
Net realized loss on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts
(178,286 ) (592,321 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments, futures contracts and swap contracts


249,576



2,124,703

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


2,594,863



4,409,432

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(2,522,842
)


(2,875,892
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
18,670,692 16,771,898
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
1,690,216 1,582,277
Cost of shares redeemed


(14,722,227
)


(46,028,695
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


5,638,681



(27,674,520
)
Change in net assets


5,710,702



(26,140,980
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


56,288,874



82,429,854

End of period (including accumulated net investment income (loss) of $(9) and $18, respectively)

$
61,999,576


$
56,288,874

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

August 31, 2005

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of seven portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated North Carolina Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a non-diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal regular income tax and the personal income taxes imposed by the state of North Carolina. Interest from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations. The Fund offers one class of shares: Class A Shares.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

Municipal bonds are valued by an independent pricing service, taking into consideration yield, liquidity, risk, credit quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, and any other factors or market data the pricing service deems relevant. The Fund generally values short-term securities according to prices furnished by an independent pricing service, except that short-term securities with remaining maturities of less than 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at amortized cost. Prices furnished by an independent pricing service are intended to be indicative of the mean between the bid and asked prices currently offered to institutional investors for the securities. Securities for which no quotations are readily available are valued at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the "Trustees").

Investment Income, Expenses, and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized/accreted for financial statement purposes.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Swap Contracts

The Fund may enter into swap contracts. A swap is an exchange of cash payments between the Fund and another party, which is based on a specific financial index. The value of the swap is adjusted daily and the change in value is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When a swap contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. The swap contracts entered into by the Fund are on a forward settling basis. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had no realized gains (losses) on swap contracts.

Risks may arise upon entering into these agreements from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contract and from unanticipated changes in the value of the financial index on which the swap agreement is based. The Fund uses swaps for hedging purposes to reduce its exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had no open swap contracts.

Futures Contracts

The Fund periodically may sell bond interest rate futures contracts to manage duration and to potentially reduce transaction costs. Upon entering into a bond interest rate futures contract with a broker, the Fund is required to deposit in a segregated account a specified amount of cash or U.S. government securities. Futures contracts are valued daily and unrealized gains or losses are recorded in a "variation margin" account. Daily, the Fund receives from or pays to the broker a specified amount of cash based upon changes in the variation margin account. When a contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. Futures contracts have market risks, including the risk that the change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had net realized losses on future contracts of $198,551.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had the following open futures contracts:

Expiration Date
   
Contracts
   
Position
   
Unrealized
Depreciation

Dec 2005

20 U.S. Treasury Note 10-Year Futures

Short

$(19,767)

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from such registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund's restricted securities are valued at the price provided by dealers in the secondary market or, if no market prices are available, at the fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Trustees.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

Class A Shares:
Shares sold
1,687,921 1,509,133
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
152,923 142,350
Shares redeemed

(1,333,746
)

(4,108,095
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS A SHARE TRANSACTIONS

507,098


(2,456,612
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are due in part to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

For the year ended August 31, 2005, permanent differences identified and reclassified among the components of net assets were as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Undistributed
Net Investment
Income

   
Accumulated
Net Realized
Losses

$(758)

$758

Net investment income (loss), net realized gains (losses), and net assets were not affected by this reclassification.

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, was as follows:


   
2005
   
2004
Tax-exempt income

$2,522,842

$2,875,892

As of August 31, 2005, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income
   
$
74,941
Net unrealized appreciation

$
4,252,544
Capital loss carryforward

$
1,278,559

At August 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $57,100,309. The net unrealized appreciation of investments for federal tax purposes excluding any unrealized appreciation from futures contracts was $4,272,312. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $4,272,312.

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $1,278,559 which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire as follows:

Expiration Year
   
Expiration Amount
2008

$332,559
2012

$494,501
2013

$451,499

Under current tax regulations, capital losses realized after October 31 may be deferred and treated as occurring on the first day of the following fiscal year. As of August 31, 2005, for federal income tax purposes, post October losses of $155,242 were deferred to September 1, 2005.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Adviser voluntarily waived $192,755 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of all Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee



   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005 the net fee paid to FAS was 0.214% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses of up to 0.25% of average daily net assets, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC voluntarily waived $146,936 of its fee. Rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay fees to FSC and FSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

Sales Charges

For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC retained $31,818 in sales charges from the sale of the Fund's Shares. See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), a subsidiary of Federated Investors, Inc. for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Under certain agreements, rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay Service Fees to FSSC and FSSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. This voluntary waiver can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC voluntarily waived $4,489 of its fee. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $27,245,000 and $27,545,000, respectively.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations (and in-kind contributions), for the year ended August 31, 2005, were as follows:

Purchases
   
$
13,054,134
Sales

$
6,939,653

7. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Since the Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers located in one state, it will be more susceptible to factors adversely affecting issuers of that state than would be a comparable tax-exempt mutual fund that invests nationally. In order to reduce the credit risk associated with such factors, at August 31, 2005, 42.1% of the securities in the portfolio of investments is backed by letters of credit or bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The largest percentage of investments insured by or supported (backed) by a letter of credit from any one institution or agency was 15.7% of total investments.

8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated (Funds) were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and will respond appropriately. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At August 31, 2005, 100% of the distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FEDERATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES INCOME TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED NORTH CAROLINA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Federated North Carolina Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust, as of August 31, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of August 31, 2005, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 18, 2005

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund ( i.e. , "Interested" Board members) and those who are not ( i.e. , "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2004, the Trust comprised seven portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 44 investment companies (comprising 133 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Chairman and Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.; Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1998
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc. (marketing communications and technology) (prior to 9/1/00).

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue and Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Began Serving

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard J. Thomas
Birth Date: June 17, 1954
TREASURER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; held various management positions within Funds Financial Services Division of Federated Investors, Inc.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE CHAIRMAN
Began serving: August 2002
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since April 1997. Ms. Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



J. Scott Albrecht
Birth Date: June 1, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations: J. Scott Albrecht is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Albrecht joined Federated in 1989. He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1997 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. He was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Albrecht is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Public Management from Carnegie Mellon University.



Board Review of Advisory Contract

As required by the Act, the Fund's Board has reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considers many factors, among the most material of which are: the Fund's investment objectives; the Adviser's management philosophy, personnel, processes, and investment and operating strategies; long-term performance; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the range and quality of services provided to the Fund and its shareholders by the Federated organization in addition to investment advisory services; and the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds.

In its decision to appoint or renew the Adviser, the Board is mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognizes that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's "selection" or approval of the Adviser must reflect the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund. The Board also considers the compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This includes fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. In this regard, the Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Adviser's service and fee. The Fund's Board is aware of these factors and is guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considers and weighs these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. In this regard, the Board requests and receives substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization. Federated provides much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnishes additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board's evaluation of an advisory contract is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, personnel, and processes; operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities; the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The evaluation process is evolutionary, reflecting continually developing considerations. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focuses on comparisons with other similar mutual funds (rather than non-mutual fund products or services) because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle already chosen by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group may be a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing on the Fund's investment program, which would in turn assist the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services are such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract.

The Board also receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses. Although the Board considers the profitability of the Federated organization as a whole, it does not evaluate, on a fund-by-fund basis, Federated's "profitability" and/or "costs" (which would include an assessment as to whether "economies of scale" would be realized if the fund were to grow to some sufficient size). In the Board's view, the cost of performing advisory services on a fund-specific basis is both difficult to estimate satisfactorily and a relatively minor consideration in its overall evaluation. Analyzing isolated funds would require constructed allocations of the costs of shared resources and operations based on artificial assumptions that are inconsistent with the existing relationships within a large and diversified family of funds that receive advisory and other services from the same organization. Although the Board is always eager to discover any genuine "economies of scale," its experience has been that such "economies" are likely to arise only when a fund grows dramatically, and becomes and remains very large in size. Even in these instances, purchase and redemption activity, as well as the presence of expense limitations (if any), may offset any perceived economies. As suggested above, the Board considers the information it receives about the Fund's performance and expenses as compared to an appropriate set of similar competing funds to be more relevant.

The Board bases its decision to approve an advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above are relevant to every Federated fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provide a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated North Carolina Municipal Income Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 313923500

28993 (10/05)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2005 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Ohio Municipal Income Fund

A Portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

August 31, 2005

Class F Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
BOARD REVIEW OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005


2004

   
2003

   
2002

   
2001

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$11.51 $11.31 $11.47 $11.45 $11.06
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.49 0.51 0.52 0.53 1 0.55
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures and swap contracts

0.15


0.20


(0.16
)

0.02
1

0.38

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.64


0.71


0.36


0.55


0.93

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.50
)

(0.51
)

(0.52
)

(0.53
)

(0.54
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$11.65


$11.51


$11.31


$11.47


$11.45

Total Return 2

5.66
%

6.36
%

3.17
%

4.97
%

8.69
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.90
%

0.90
%

0.90
%

0.90
%

0.90
%
Net investment income

4.21
%

4.44
%

4.51
%

4.75
% 1

4.90
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.49
%

0.48
%

0.45
%

0.49
%

0.51
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$100,753


$94,744


$96,374


$89,772


$75,896

Portfolio turnover

16
%

19
%

12
%

21
%

39
%

1 Effective September 1, 2001, the Fund adopted the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began accreting discount on debt securities. For the year ended August 31, 2002, this change had no effect on the net investment income per share or the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share, but increased the ratio of the net investment income to average net assets from 4.74% to 4.75%. Per share, ratios and supplemental data for the periods prior to September 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and /or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2005.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on purchases or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


   
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/2005

   
Ending
Account Value
8/31/2005

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,024.10

$4.59
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,020.67

$4.58

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio of 0.90%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

The fund's total return, based on net asset value, for the 12-month reporting period was 5.66% for the fund's Class F Shares. The total return of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 1 the fund's benchmark index, was 5.31% during the 12-month reporting period. The fund's total return for the most recently completed fiscal year reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs and other expenses which were not reflected in the total return of the LBMB.

The fund's investment strategy focused on: (a) the effective duration of its portfolio (which indicates the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates); (b) the selection of securities with different maturities (expressed by a "yield curve" showing the relative yield of similar securities with different maturities) and higher coupon tax-exempt municipal bonds (bonds with higher interest rate payments); (c) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as "sectors"); and (d) the credit ratings of portfolio securities (which indicates the risk that securities will default). 2 These were the most significant factors affecting the fund's performance relative to the LBMB.

The following discussion focuses on the performance of the fund's Class F Shares. The 5.66% total return of the Class F Shares for the reporting period consisted of 4.44% of tax-exempt dividends and 1.22% appreciation in the net asset value of the shares. 3

1 The LBMB is the broad-based securities market index for the fund. The LBMB is a broad market performance benchmark for the tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBMB, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of Baa, have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The LBMB includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Indexes are unmanaged, and it is not possible to invest directly in an index.

2 Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices.

3 Income may be subject to federal alternative minimum tax.

MARKET OVERVIEW

During the reporting period, long-term interest rates remained low but showed some volatility as the bond market appeared to attempt to determine the extent of the strength of the U.S. economy and the Federal Reserve Board's (the "Fed") intentions concerning short term interest rates. The ten-year Treasury note began the reporting period at 4.12%, reached a high of 4.64% on March 22, 2005, and then declined to 4.01% at the end of the reporting period. The continuation of the low interest rate environment resulted in investors pursuing lower rated credits because of the additional yield they offered. As a result, certain revenue bond sectors out performed the LBMB, such as hospital, industrial development and pollution control project bonds. High-yield, tax-exempt municipal debt (non-investment grade bonds rated "BB" or lower or unrated bonds of comparable quality) provided strong total returns as investors were attracted to the significantly higher yield provided by these issues.

The Fed raised short-term rates eight times during the reporting period bringing the Federal Funds Target Rate to 3.50% by the end of the reporting period. This resulted in a significant flattening of the tax-exempt municipal yield curve with short-term interest rates rising and long-term interest rates actually declining (that is, while securities provided higher incremental income or yield as maturities became longer, the amount of the increase in incremental income was less or flattened).

Credit spreads, or the yield difference between the "AAA" municipal bonds and bonds of lower credit quality and similar maturity, decreased during the reporting period. This decrease in credit spreads appeared to be the result of both improving economic activity and the demand for securities with higher yields.

DURATION 4

As determined at the end of the reporting period, the fund's dollar-weighted average duration was 5.28 years. Duration management is a significant component of the fund's investment strategy. The shorter a fund's duration relative to an index, the less its net asset value will react as interest rates change. The fund's duration was maintained close to the duration of the LBMB during the reporting period. The neutral duration of the fund did not have a significant impact on the fund's performance. The fund's use of forward settling municipal interest rate swaps and Treasury futures contacts, which did not perform well, to adjust portfolio duration had a negative impact on the fund's performance during the reporting period.

4 Duration is a measure of a security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations.

MATURITY AND COUPON

During the reporting period, the average coupon of the tax-exempt bonds held by the fund was greater than the average coupon of the bonds held by the LBMB, which reflected the fund's emphasis on tax exempt income. For bonds with larger coupons, more of the return was provided from income as opposed to price appreciation. As a result, in a falling interest rate environment, bonds with larger coupons were less sensitive to interest rate changes than bonds with lower coupons. As interest rates declined consistently over the reporting period zero coupon and discount securities outperformed premium bonds by a wide margin. The larger average coupon for the fund had a negative impact on performance relative to the LBMB.

SECTOR

During the reporting period, the fund allocated more of its portfolio to securities issued by hospitals, industrial development projects and higher education institutions. The fund also allocated less of the portfolio to pre-refunded tax-exempt municipal bonds (bonds for which the principal and interest payments are secured or guaranteed by cash or U.S. Treasury securities held in an escrow account). These allocations helped the fund's performance due to the greater price appreciation that occurred in the over weighted sectors and the smaller increase in the price of pre-refunded bonds as compared to other sectors. The fund did have industrial development revenue bonds backed by General Motors Corporation and Ford Motor Company whose prices were negatively impacted by the automobile sector's credit deterioration and their related downgrade to junk bond (non-investment grade) status.

CREDIT QUALITY

The fund's overweight position, relative to the LBMB, in "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt benefited the fund's performance as credit spreads became tighter to a greater extent for "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt than for other investment grade rated ("AAA", "AA", "A" or comparable quality) debt (meaning that the yield on the "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt improved to a greater extent than for other investment grade rated (or comparable quality) debt). 5 However, the funds small allocation to high yield tax-exempt municipal debt (bonds rated "BB" and below or unrated bonds of comparable quality) impacted the fund's performance negatively as this sector of the market also performed well during the reporting period as the demand for high-yield, tax-exempt municipal debt was great.

5 Investment grade securities are securities that are rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Non-investment grade securities are securities that are not rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT - CLASS F SHARES

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 1 in Federated Ohio Municipal Income Fund (Class F Shares) (the "Fund") from August 31, 1995 to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 2 and the Lipper Ohio Municipal Debt Funds Average (LOMDFA). 3

Average Annual Total Return 4 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   

1 Year

3.58%
5 Years

5.55%
10 Years

5.32%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum sales charge of 1.00% and the 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge, as applicable.

1 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting the maximum sales charge of 1.00% ($10,000 investment minus $100 sales charge = $9,900). The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBMB and LOMDFA have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the index and average. Indexes are unmanaged and unlike the Fund, are not affected by cash flows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or an average.

2 The LBMB is an unmanaged index comprising bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The index includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. It is not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance.

3 The LOMDFA represents the average of the total returns reported by all of the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling into the respective category. These total returns are reported net of expenses and other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a mutual fund's performance.

4 Total return quoted reflects all applicable sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges.

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400.

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At August 31, 2005, the Fund's credit-quality ratings composition 1 was as follows:

S&P Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

    Moody's Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

AAA

25.3%
Aaa

37.7%
AA

15.6%
Aa

14.1%
A

7.2%
A

8.9%
BBB

6.8%
Baa

7.7%
BB

5.1%
Ba

2.5%
Not Rated by S&P

40.0%
Not Rated by Moody's

29.1%
   TOTAL

100.0%
   TOTAL

100.0%

1 These tables depict the long-term, credit-quality ratings assigned to the Fund's portfolio holdings by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), each of which is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). These credit-quality ratings are shown without regard to gradations within a given rating category. For example, securities rated "A-" have been included in the "A" rated category. Rated securities that have been prerefunded, but not rated again by the NRSRO, have been included in the "Not rated by..." category.

Rated securities include a security with an obligor and/or credit enhancer that has received a rating from an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt obligations that is comparable in priority and security with the security held by the Fund. Credit-quality ratings are an assessment of the risk that a security will default in payment and do not address other risks presented by the security. Please see the descriptions of credit-quality ratings in the Fund's Statement of Additional Information.

Holdings that are rated only by a different NRSRO than the one identified have been included in the "Not rated by..." category. Of the Portfolio's total investments, 11.1% do not have long term ratings by either of these NRSROs.

2 Percentages are based on total investments, which may differ from the Fund's total net assets used in computing the percentages in the Portfolio of Investments which follows.

Portfolio of Investments

August 31, 2005

Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--96.7%
Ohio--91.4%
$ 1,000,000 Akron, Bath & Copley, OH Joint Township, Hospital District Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.125% (Summa Health System)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.38%), 11/15/2024
NR/Aa3 $ 1,055,880
1,750,000 Akron, Bath & Copley, OH Joint Township, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.25% (Summa Health System)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.47%), 11/15/2031
NR/Aa3 1,857,398
1,000,000 Akron, OH, LT GO Bonds, 5.80% (Original Issue Yield: 5.95%), 11/1/2020
AA/A1 1,119,480
1,000,000 Bay Village, OH City School District, School Improvement UT GO Bonds, 5.125% (Original Issue Yield: 5.16%), 12/1/2021
NR/Aa2 1,072,800
1,000,000 Cleveland, OH Waterworks, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002K), 5.25% (FGIC INS), 1/1/2021
AAA/Aaa 1,106,670
530,000 Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority, Bond Fund Program Development Revenue Bonds (Series 2004E), 5.60% (Port of Cleveland Bond Fund), 5/15/2025
NR 545,815
465,000 Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority, Development Revenue Bonds (Series 2001B), 6.50% (Port of Cleveland Bond Fund), 11/15/2021
NR 494,825
500,000 Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority, Development Revenue Bonds (Series 2002C), 5.95% (Port of Cleveland Bond Fund), 5/15/2022
NR 527,735
500,000 Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority, Development Revenue Bonds (Series 2005B), 5.125% (Port of Cleveland Bond Fund), 5/15/2025
NR 506,905
1,000,000 Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority, Special Assessment Tax-Increment Revenue Bonds, 7.00% (University Heights, OH Public Parking Garage)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.20%), 12/1/2018
NR 1,078,490
1,000,000 Columbus, OH City School District, School Facilities Construction & Improvement UT GO Bonds, 5.25% (FSA INS), 12/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 1,107,610
1,610,000 Columbus, OH City School District, School Facilities Construction & Improvement UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FGIC INS), 12/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 1,740,796
1,000,000 Columbus, OH Tax Increment Financing, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.00% (Easton Project)/(AMBAC INS), 12/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 1,068,970
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Ohio--continued
$ 1,000,000 2 Delaware County, OH, Capital Facilities LT GO Bonds, 6.25%, 12/1/2020
AA+/Aa1 $ 1,154,830
1,000,000 Erie County, OH, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (Firelands Regional Medical Center)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.66%), 8/15/2022
A/A2 1,067,950
1,500,000 Fairfield, OH Hospital Facilities, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.05%), 6/15/2028
AA/NR 1,548,675
1,500,000 Fairview Park, OH, Various Purpose Refunding & Improvement LT GO Bonds, 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 12/1/2030
NR/Aaa 1,611,315
500,000 Franklin County, OH Health Care Facilities, Improvement Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.125% (Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Services)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.25%), 7/1/2035
BBB/NR 517,105
1,500,000 Franklin County, OH Health Care Facilities, Revenue Refunding Bonds, 5.50% (Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Services)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.69%), 7/1/2021
BBB/NR 1,551,195
750,000 Franklin County, OH, Revenue Refunding Bonds, 5.75% (Capitol South Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.), 6/1/2011
NR 787,868
1,000,000 Greene County, OH, University Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (Marauder Development LLC at Central State University)/(American Capital Access INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.65%), 9/1/2027
A/NR 1,053,040
1,000,000 Greene County, OH, University Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.375% (Marauder Development LLC at Central State University)/(American Capital Access INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.55%), 9/1/2022
A/NR 1,058,930
1,530,000 Hamilton County, OH Hospital Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004J), 5.25% (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center)/(FGIC INS), 5/15/2023
AAA/Aaa 1,674,050
580,000 Hamilton County, OH Hospital Facilities Authority, Revenue Refunding & Improvement Bonds, 7.00% (Deaconess Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.046%), 1/1/2012
A-/A3 584,547
2,400,000 Hamilton County, OH Sewer System, Improvement Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 5.75% (Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati)/(United States Treasury PRF 6/1/2010 @101)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.78%), 12/1/2025
AAA/Aaa 2,691,360
2,000,000 Hamilton County, OH, Subordinated Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Series B), 5.25% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.62%), 12/1/2032
NR/Aaa 2,154,480
2,000,000 Hamilton, OH City School District, School Improvement UT GO Bonds (Series 1999A), 5.50% (Original Issue Yield: 5.75%), 12/1/2024
AA/NR 2,205,360
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Ohio--continued
$ 1,000,000 Heath, OH City School District, School Improvement UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 5.50% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.635%), 12/1/2027
NR/Aaa $ 1,093,100
1,010,000 Kent State University, OH, General Receipts Revenue Bonds, 6.00% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.09%), 5/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 1,131,008
1,500,000 Lake, OH Local School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.75% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 12/1/2021
AAA/Aaa 1,683,570
1,315,000 Licking Heights, OH Local School District, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 12/1/2032
NR/Aaa 1,404,341
2,000,000 Licking Heights, OH Local School District, School Facilities Construction & Improvement UT GO Bonds (Series 2000A), 5.50% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.58%), 12/1/2024
NR/Aaa 2,201,280
1,500,000 Lorain County, OH, Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1998A), 5.25% (Kendal at Oberlin)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.53%), 2/1/2021
BBB/NR 1,517,445
1,000,000 Lorain County, OH, Hospital Revenue Refunding & Improvement Bonds, 5.25% (Catholic Healthcare Partners)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.52%), 10/1/2033
AA-/Aa3 1,047,930
1,500,000 Lucas County, OH, Health Care Facilities Refunding & Improvement Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.625% (Sunset Retirement Community, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.75%), 8/15/2030
NR 1,629,555
1,000,000 Mahoning County, OH Hospital Facilities, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.00% (Forum Health Obligated Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.15%), 11/15/2032
BBB+/Baa1 1,097,000
1,000,000 Marion County, OH Hospital Authority, Hospital Refunding & Improvement Revenue Bonds (Series 1996), 6.375% (Community Hospital of Springfield)/(United States Treasury PRF 5/15/2006 @102)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.52%), 5/15/2011
NR 1,043,060
1,000,000 Medina County, OH Library District, UT GO Bonds, 5.25% (FGIC INS), 12/1/2023
AAA/Aaa 1,113,790
1,000,000 Miami County, OH, Hospital Facilities Revenue Refunding & Improvement Bonds (Series 1996A), 6.375% (Upper Valley Medical Center, OH)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.62%), 5/15/2026
BBB+/Baa1 1,033,350
1,000,000 Moraine, OH Solid Waste Disposal Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.75% (General Motors Corp.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.80%), 7/1/2014
BB/Ba2 1,047,040
1,315,000 Ohio HFA, Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2002 A-1), 5.30% (GNMA GTD), 9/1/2022
NR/Aaa 1,335,711
2,500,000 Ohio State Air Quality Development Authority, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 2002A), 6.00% (Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.), 12/1/2013
BB+/Baa3 2,607,275
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Ohio--continued
$ 1,500,000 Ohio State Environmental Facilities, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 5.75% (Ford Motor Co.), 4/1/2035
BB+/Ba1 $ 1,427,220
1,000,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Higher Educational Facility Revenue Bonds, 5.125% (Oberlin College), 10/1/2024
AA/NR 1,075,440
1,000,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002B), 5.50% (Case Western Reserve University, OH), 10/1/2022
AA-/A1 1,117,830
1,000,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (University of Dayton)/(AMBAC INS), 12/1/2027
AAA/Aaa 1,072,230
500,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Baldwin-Wallace College), 12/1/2021
A-/NR 541,630
1,070,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Baldwin-Wallace College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.53%), 12/1/2023
A-/NR 1,151,020
610,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Baldwin-Wallace College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.61%), 12/1/2024
A-/NR 654,817
2,000,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds, 5.85% (John Carroll University, OH)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.05%), 4/1/2020
NR/A2 2,166,240
2,000,000 Ohio State University, General Receipts Revenue Bonds (Series 2003B), 5.25%, 6/1/2023
AA/Aa2 2,218,480
2,000,000 Ohio State Water Development Authority, PCR Bonds, 5.10%, 12/1/2022
AAA/Aaa 2,205,700
1,000,000 Ohio Waste Development Authority Solid Waste, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 4.85% TOBs (Waste Management, Inc.), Mandatory Tender 11/1/2007
BBB/NR 1,020,400
1,620,000 Olentangy, OH Local School District, School Facilities Construction & Improvement UT GO Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25%, 12/1/2021
AA/Aa2 1,779,392
1,835,000 Otsego, OH Local School District, Construction & Improvement UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.15%), 12/1/2028
NR/Aaa 1,963,156
1,255,000 Ottawa & Glandorf, OH Local School District, School Facilities Construction & Improvement UT GO Bonds, 5.25% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 12/1/2020
NR/Aaa 1,378,480
1,000,000 Parma, OH, Hospital Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.375% (Parma Community General Hospital Association)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.45%), 11/1/2029
A-/NR 1,032,680
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Ohio--continued
$ 500,000 Port Authority for Columbiana County, OH, Solid Waste Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 7.25% (Apex Environmental LLC)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.30%), 8/1/2034
NR $ 510,495
500,000 3 Port of Greater Cincinnati, OH Development Authority, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, 6.30% (Cincinnati Mills), 2/15/2024
NR 539,935
1,000,000 Portage County, OH Board of County Hospital Trustees, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.75% (Robinson Memorial Hospital)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 11/15/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,103,920
1,500,000 Rickenbacker, OH Port Authority, Capital Funding Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.375% (OASBO Expanded Asset Pooled Financing Program)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 1/1/2032
NR/A2 1,677,555
2,000,000 Springboro, OH Community School District, School Improvement UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.03%), 12/1/2032
AAA/Aaa 2,124,300
1,000,000 Steubenville, OH, Hospital Facilities Revenue Refunding & Improvement Bonds, 6.375% (Trinity Health System Obligated Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.55%), 10/1/2020
NR/A3 1,102,670
500,000 Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004C), 6.375% (Northwest Ohio Bond Fund), 11/15/2032
NR 528,445
1,500,000 Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.45% (CSX Corp.), 12/15/2021
NR/Baa2 1,763,340
1,375,000 Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Crocker Park Public Improvement Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.37%), 12/1/2023
NR 1,444,424
2,000,000 Tuscarawas County, OH, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, 5.75% (Union Hospital)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 10/1/2026
AA/Aa1 2,190,500
1,025,000 University of Cincinnati, OH, General Receipts Revenue Bonds (Series 2004D), 5.00% (AMBAC INS), 6/1/2026
AAA/Aaa 1,097,252
1,000,000 Warrensville Heights, OH School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.75% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.83%), 12/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 1,120,950
1,995,000 Waynesville, OH Health Care Facilities, Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 5.70% (Quaker Heights Project)/(GNMA GTD), 2/20/2043

NR/Aaa



2,164,735
   TOTAL





92,102,770
Principal
Amount

   


   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Puerto Rico--5.0%
$ 2,000,000 3 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Drivers (Series 266), 8.2089% (FSA INS), 7/1/2015
AAA/NR $ 2,651,500
1,000,000 3 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Residual Interest Tax-Exempt Securities (Series PA 331B), 7.78959% (AMBAC INS), 1/1/2011
NR 1,310,630
990,000 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Cogeneration Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.625% (AES Puerto Rico Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.65%), 6/1/2026

NR/Baa3



1,075,496
   TOTAL





5,037,626
Virgin Islands--0.3%
305,000 Virgin Islands HFA, SFM Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series A), 6.50% (GNMA COL)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.522%), 3/1/2025

AAA/NR



310,850
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (IDENTIFIED COST $90,471,023)





97,451,246
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--1.6%
Ohio--1.6%
1,600,000 Hamilton County, OH Hospital Facilities Authority, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (Drake Center, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC) (at amortized cost)

NR/VMIG1



1,600,000
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--98.3%
(IDENTIFIED COST $92,071,023) 4






99,051,246
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--1.7%





1,701,811
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%




$
100,753,057

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 7.8% of the Fund's portfolio as calculated based upon total portfolio market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 Current credit ratings are unaudited.

2 Pledged as collateral to ensure the Fund is able to satisfy the obligations of its outstanding short futures contracts.

3 Denotes a restricted security, including securities purchased under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities, all of which have been deemed liquid by criteria approved by the fund's Board of Trustees, unless registered under the Act or exempted from registration, may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. At August 31, 2005, these securities amounted to $4,502,065 which represents 4.5% of total net assets.

4 The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $92,070,912.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at August 31, 2005.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
COL --Collateralized
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA --Financial Security Assurance
GNMA --Government National Mortgage Association
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
INS --Insured
LT --Limited Tax
PCR --Pollution Control Revenue
PRF --Prerefunded
SFM --Single Family Mortgage
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
UT --Unlimited Tax
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

August 31, 2005

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at value (identified cost $92,071,023)
$ 99,051,246
Cash
83,288
Income receivable
1,322,177
Receivable for investments sold
405,000
Receivable for shares sold





194,541

   TOTAL ASSETS





101,056,252

Liabilities:
Payable for shares redeemed
$ 40,702
Income distribution payable
157,309
Payable for daily variation margin
40,000
Payable for share registration fee
11,138
Payable for transfer and dividend and disbursing agent fees and expenses
7,974
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fee
446
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
12,680
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
20,619
Accrued expenses


12,327




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





303,195

Net assets for 8,650,621 shares outstanding




$
100,753,057

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 96,115,919
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and futures contracts
6,901,153
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and futures contracts
(2,169,266 )
Accumulated net investment income (loss)





(94,749
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
100,753,057

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
Net asset value per share ($100,753,057 ÷ 8,650,621 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$11.65

Offering price per share (100/99.00 of $11.65) 1





$11.77

Redemption proceeds per share (99.00/100 of $11.65) 1





$11.53

1 See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended August 31, 2005

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
4,990,750

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 390,646
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
150,000
Custodian fees
6,073
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
50,358
Directors'/Trustees' fees
2,436
Auditing fees
19,188
Legal fees
8,205
Portfolio accounting fees
49,944
Distribution services fee (Note 5)
390,646
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
239,881
Share registration costs
21,373
Printing and postage
16,947
Insurance premiums
8,588
Miscellaneous






1,721





   TOTAL EXPENSES






1,356,006





Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (205,227 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(24,022 )
Waiver of distribution services fee
(244,154 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee


(490
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS






(473,893
)




Net expenses










882,113

Net investment income










4,108,637

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments:
Net realized gain on investments
383,133
Net realized loss on futures contracts
(305,417 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments
1,280,334
Net change in unrealized depreciation of futures contracts










(79,070
)
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and futures contracts










1,278,980

Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
5,387,617

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended August 31
   

2005

   

2004

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 4,108,637 $ 4,291,904
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts
77,716 (828,585 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments, futures contracts and swap contracts


1,201,264



2,419,256

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


5,387,617



5,882,575

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(4,202,323
)


(4,263,196
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
14,611,961 12,734,977
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
2,229,294 2,111,168
Cost of shares redeemed


(12,017,885
)


(18,095,309
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


4,823,370



(3,249,164
)
Change in net assets


6,008,664



(1,629,785
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


94,744,393



96,374,178

End of period (including accumulated net investment income (loss) of $(94,749) and $(1,041), respectively)

$
100,753,057


$
94,744,393

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

August 31, 2005

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end, management investment company. The Trust consists of seven portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of the Federated Ohio Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a non-diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal regular income tax (federal regular income tax does not include the federal alternative minimum tax) and the personal income taxes imposed by the state of Ohio and Ohio municipalities. Interest income from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations. The Fund offers one class of Shares: Class F Shares.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

Municipal bonds are valued by an independent pricing service, taking into consideration yield, liquidity, risk, credit quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, and any other factors or market data the pricing service deems relevant. The Fund generally values short-term securities according to prices furnished by an independent pricing service, except that short-term securities with remaining maturities of less than 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at amortized cost. Prices furnished by an independent pricing service are intended to be indicative of the mean between the bid and asked prices currently offered to institutional investors for the securities. Securities for which no quotations are readily available are valued at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the "Trustees").

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized/accreted for financial statement purposes.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from such registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund's restricted securities are valued at the price provided by dealers in the secondary market or, if no market prices are available, at the fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Trustees.

Additional information on restricted securities, excluding securities purchased under Rule 144A that have been deemed liquid by the Trustees, held at August 31, 2005, is as follows:

Security
   
Acquisition Date
   
Acquisition Cost
Port of Greater Cincinnati, OH Development Authority, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, 6.30% (Cincinnati Mills), 2/15/2024

2/11/2004

$ 500,000
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Residual Interest Tax-Exempt Securities (Series PA 331B), 7.78959% (AMBAC INS), 1/1/2011

3/3/1998

$1,158,780

Swap Contracts

The Fund may enter into swap contracts. A swap is an exchange of cash payments between the Fund and another party, which is based on a specific financial index. The value of the swap is adjusted daily and the change in value is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When a swap contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. The swap contracts entered into by the Fund are on a forward settling basis. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had no realized gain/loss on swap contracts.

Risks may arise upon entering into these agreements from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contract and from unanticipated changes in the value of the financial index on which the swap agreement is based. The Fund uses swaps for hedging purposes to reduce its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. At August 31, 2005, the Fund had no open swap contracts.

Futures Contracts

The Fund periodically may sell bond interest rate futures contracts to manage duration and to potentially reduce transaction costs. Upon entering into a bond interest rate futures contract with a broker, the Fund is required to deposit in a segregated account a specified amount of cash or U.S. government securities. Futures contracts are valued daily and unrealized gains or losses are recorded in a "variation margin" account. Daily, the Fund receives from or pays to the broker a specified amount of cash based upon changes in the variation margin account. When a contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. Futures contracts have market risks, including the risk that the change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had realized losses on futures contracts of $305,417.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had the following open futures contracts:

Expiration Date
   
Contracts to Receive


   
Position
   
Unrealized
Depreciation

December 2005

80 U.S. Treasury Notes 10 Yr Futures

Short

$(79,070)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

Shares sold
1,258,396 1,102,382
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
192,142 183,888
Shares redeemed

(1,034,512
)

(1,573,949
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

416,026


(287,679
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

For the year ended August 31, 2005, permanent differences identified and reclassified among the components of net assets were as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Undistributed
Net Investment
Income (Loss)

   
Accumulated
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)

$(22)

$22

Net investment income (loss), net realized gains (losses), and net assets were not affected by this reclassification.

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, was as follows:


   
2005
   
2004
Tax-exempt income

$4,202,323

$4,263,196

As of August 31, 2005, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income
   
$
258,310
Net unrealized appreciation

$
6,980,334
Capital loss carryforward

$
2,248,448

The difference between book-basis and tax basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization of debt securities.

At August 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $92,070,912. The net unrealized appreciation of investments for federal tax purposes excluding any unrealized depreciation from futures contracts was $6,980,334. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $7,053,103 and net unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $72,769.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $2,248,448, which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire as follows:

Expiration Year
   
Expiration Amount
2008

$695,145
2009

$598,494
2010

$ 69,375
2011

$ 87,412
2012

$176,880
2013

$621,142

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Adviser voluntarily waived $205,227 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of all Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.129% of average daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses of up to 0.40% of average daily net assets, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC voluntarily waived $244,154 of its fee. Rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay fees to FSC and FSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC retained $146,492 of fees paid by the Fund.

Sales Charges

For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC retained $10,984 of contingent deferred sales charges relating to redemptions of Class F Shares. See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), a subsidiary of Federated Investors, Inc., for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Under certain agreements, rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay Service Fees to FSSC and FSSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. This voluntary waiver can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC voluntarily waived $490 of its fee. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC retained $7,552 of fees paid by the Fund.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $38,175,000 and $35,775,000, respectively.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations, for the year ended August 31, 2005, were as follows:

Purchases
   
$
18,093,084
Sales

$
14,823,078

7. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Since the Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers located in one state, it will be more susceptible to factors adversely affecting issuers of that state than would be a comparable tax-exempt mutual fund that invests nationally. In order to reduce the credit risk associated with such factors, at August 31, 2005, 43.7% of the securities in the portfolio of investments is backed by letters of credit or bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The largest percentage of investments insured by or supported (backed) by a letter of credit from any one institution or agency was 11.9% of total investments.

8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated (Funds) were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and will respond appropriately. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At August 31, 2005, 100.0% of the distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal alternative minimum tax.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FEDERATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES INCOME TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED OHIO MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Federated Ohio Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust, as of August 31, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of August 31, 2005, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 18, 2005

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2004, the Trust comprised seven portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 44 investment companies (comprising 133 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Chairman and Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.; Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1998
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc. (marketing communications and technology) (prior to 9/1/00).

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue and Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Began Serving

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard J. Thomas
Birth Date: June 17, 1954
TREASURER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; held various management positions within Funds Financial Services Division of Federated Investors, Inc.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE CHAIRMAN
Began serving: August 2002
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



J. Scott Albrecht
Birth Date: June 1, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: November 1998
J. Scott Albrecht has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since March 1995. He is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Albrecht joined Federated in 1989. He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1997 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. He was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Albrecht is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Public Management from Carnegie Mellon University.



Board Review of Advisory Contract

As required by the Act, the Fund's Board has reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considers many factors, among the most material of which are: the Fund's investment objectives; the Adviser's management philosophy, personnel, processes, and investment and operating strategies; long-term performance; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the range and quality of services provided to the Fund and its shareholders by the Federated organization in addition to investment advisory services; and the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds.

In its decision to appoint or renew the Adviser, the Board is mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognizes that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's "selection" or approval of the Adviser must reflect the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund. The Board also considers the compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This includes fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. In this regard, the Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Adviser's service and fee. The Fund's Board is aware of these factors and is guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considers and weighs these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. In this regard, the Board requests and receives substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization. Federated provides much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnishes additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board's evaluation of an advisory contract is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, personnel, and processes; operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities; the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The evaluation process is evolutionary, reflecting continually developing considerations. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focuses on comparisons with other similar mutual funds (rather than non-mutual fund products or services) because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle already chosen by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group may be a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing on the Fund's investment program, which would in turn assist the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services are such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract.

The Board also receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses. Although the Board considers the profitability of the Federated organization as a whole, it does not evaluate, on a fund-by-fund basis, Federated's "profitability" and/or "costs" (which would include an assessment as to whether "economies of scale" would be realized if the fund were to grow to some sufficient size). In the Board's view, the cost of performing advisory services on a fund-specific basis is both difficult to estimate satisfactorily and a relatively minor consideration in its overall evaluation. Analyzing isolated funds would require constructed allocations of the costs of shared resources and operations based on artificial assumptions that are inconsistent with the existing relationships within a large and diversified family of funds that receive advisory and other services from the same organization. Although the Board is always eager to discover any genuine "economies of scale," its experience has been that such "economies" are likely to arise only when a fund grows dramatically, and becomes and remains very large in size. Even in these instances, purchase and redemption activity, as well as the presence of expense limitations (if any), may offset any perceived economies. As suggested above, the Board considers the information it receives about the Fund's performance and expenses as compared to an appropriate set of similar competing funds to be more relevant.

The Board bases its decision to approve an advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above are relevant to every Federated fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provide a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Ohio Municipal Income Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 313923609

28994 (10/05)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2005 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund

A Portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

August 31, 2005

Class A Shares
Class B Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
BOARD REVIEW OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights - Class A Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

   
2001

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$11.71 $11.51 $11.70 $11.52 $11.09
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.54 0.54 0.54 0.56 1 0.57
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts

0.10


0.19


(0.19
)

0.18
1

0.42

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.64


0.73


0.35


0.74


0.99

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.54
)

(0.53
)

(0.54
)

(0.56
)

(0.56
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$11.81


$11.71


$11.51


$11.70


$11.52

Total Return 2

5.58
%

6.46
%

3.04
%

6.70
%

9.18
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.75
%

0.75
%

0.75
%

0.75
%

0.75
%
Net investment income

4.55
%

4.63
%

4.58
%

4.92
% 1

5.09
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.11
%

0.10
%

0.09
%

0.09
%

0.10
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$209,005


$200,023


$210,429


$205,870


$194,407

Portfolio turnover

12
%

9
%

17
%

18
%

16
%

1 Effective September 1, 2001, the Fund adopted the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began accreting discount on debt securities. For the year ended August 31, 2002, this change had no effect on the net investment income per share, the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share, or the ratio of net investment income to average net assets. Per share, ratios and supplemental data for the periods prior to September 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable.

Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights - Class B Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

   
2001

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$11.71 $11.51 $11.70 $11.53 $11.09
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.45 0.45 0.45 0.47 1 0.48
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts

0.10


0.19


(0.19
)

0.18
1

0.43

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.55


0.64


0.26


0.65


0.91

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.45
)

(0.44
)

(0.45
)

(0.48
)

(0.47
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$11.81


$11.71


$11.51


$11.70


$11.53

Total Return 2

4.77
%

5.65
%

2.26
%

5.79
%

8.42
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
















Net expenses

1.52
%

1.52
%

1.52
%

1.52
%

1.52
%
Net investment income

3.78
%

3.85
%

3.81
%

4.15
% 1

4.32
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.09
%

0.08
%

0.07
%

0.07
%

0.08
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$59,770


$65,748


$70,339


$61,535


$51,468

Portfolio turnover

12
%

9
%

17
%

18
%

16
%

1 Effective September 1, 2001, the Fund adopted the provisions of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and began accreting discount on debt securities. For the year ended August 31, 2002, this change had no effect on the net investment income per share, the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share, or the ratio of the net investment income to average net assets. Per share, ratios and supplemental data for the periods prior to September 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.

2 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable.

Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2005.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


   
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/2005

   
Ending
Account Value
8/31/2005

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:






Class A Shares

$1,000

$1,028.40

$3.89
Class B Shares

$1,000

$1,024.40

$7.76
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Class A Shares

$1,000

$1,021.37

$3.87
Class B Shares

$1,000

$1,017.54

$7.73

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratios, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized expense ratios are as follows:

Class A Shares
   
0.76%
Class B Shares

1.52%

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

The fund's total return, based on net asset value, for the 12-month reporting period was 5.58% for Class A Shares and 4.77% for Class B Shares. The total return of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 1 the fund's benchmark index, was 5.31% during the 12-month reporting period. The fund's total return for the most recently completed fiscal year reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs and other expenses which were not reflected in the total return of the LBMB.

The fund's investment strategy focused on: (a) the effective duration of its portfolio (which indicates the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates); (b) the selection of securities with different maturities (expressed by a "yield curve" showing the relative yield of similar securities with different maturities) and higher coupon tax-exempt municipal bonds (bonds with higher interest rate payments); (c) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as "sectors"); and (d) the credit ratings of portfolio securities (which indicates the risk that securities will default). 2 These were the most significant factors affecting the fund's performance relative to the LBMB.

The following discussion focuses on the performance of the fund's Class A Shares. The 5.58% total return of the Class A Shares for the reporting period consisted of 4.72% of tax-exempt dividends and 0.86% appreciation in the net asset value of the shares. 3

1 The LBMB is the broad-based securities market index for the fund. The LBMB is a broad market performance benchmark for the tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBMB, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of Baa, have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The LBMB includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Indexes are unmanaged, and it is not possible to invest directly in an index.

2 Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices.

3 Income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

MARKET OVERVIEW

During the reporting period, long-term interest rates remained low but showed some volatility as the bond market appeared to attempt to determine the extent of the strength of the U.S. economy and the Federal Reserve Board's (the "Fed") intentions concerning short-term interest rates. The ten-year Treasury note began the reporting period at 4.12%, reached a high of 4.64% on March 22, 2005, and then declined to 4.01% at the end of the reporting period. The continuation of the low interest rate environment resulted in investors pursuing lower rated credits because of the additional yield they offered. As a result, certain revenue bond sectors out performed the LBMB, such as hospital, industrial development and pollution control project bonds. High-yield, tax-exempt municipal debt (non-investment grade bonds rated "BB" and lower or unrated bonds of a comparable quality) provided strong total returns as investors were attracted to the significantly higher yield provided by these issues.

The Fed raised short-term rates eight times during the reporting period bringing the Federal Funds Target Rate to 3.50% by the end of the reporting period. This resulted in a significant flattening of the tax-exempt municipal yield curve with short-term interest rates rising and long-term interest rates actually declining (that is, while securities provided higher incremental income or yield as maturities became longer, the amount of the increase in incremental income was less or flattened).

Credit spreads, or the yield difference between the "AAA" municipal bonds and bonds of lower credit quality and similar maturity, decreased during the reporting period. This decrease in credit spreads appeared to be the result of both improving economic activity and the demand for securities with higher yields.

DURATION 4

As determined at the end of the reporting period, the fund's dollar-weighted average duration was 4.86 years. Duration management is a significant component of the fund's investment strategy. The shorter a fund's duration relative to an index, the less its net asset value will react as interest rates change. The fund's duration was longer than the duration of the LBMB during the reporting period. As a result, when yields declined during the reporting period the fund's net asset value appreciated to a greater extent than the LBMB's market value. The fund's use of forward settling municipal interest rate swaps and Treasury futures contacts, which did not perform well, to adjust portfolio duration had a negative impact on the fund's performance during the period.

4 Duration is a measure of a security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations.

MATURITY

During the reporting period, the fund held a greater concentration of tax-exempt municipal bonds with maturities shorter than 20 years than the LBMB. Bonds with longer maturities provided better returns during the reporting period as the yield curve flattened and the yields on bonds with longer maturities declined while the yield on bonds with shorter maturities increased. Even though the fund increased its holdings of tax-exempt municipal bonds with 20- to 30-year maturities, the fund remained underweighted relative to the LBMB with respect to longer maturity bonds. This underweight position had a negative impact on the fund's performance relative to the LBMB because the fund did not share in the better returns provided by longer maturity bonds to the same extent as the LBMB.

SECTOR

During the reporting period, the fund allocated more of its portfolio to securities issued by hospitals, industrial development projects and higher education institutions. The fund also allocated less of the portfolio to pre-refunded tax-exempt municipal bonds (bonds for which the principal and interest payments are secured or guaranteed by cash or U.S. Treasury securities held in an escrow account). These allocations helped the fund's performance due to the greater price appreciation that occurred in the over weighted sectors and the smaller increase in the price of pre-refunded bonds as compared to other sectors.

CREDIT QUALITY

The fund's overweight position, relative to the LBMB, in "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt benefited the fund's performance as credit spreads became tighter to a greater extent for "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt than for other investment grade rated ("AAA," "AA," "A" or comparable quality) debt (meaning that the yield on the "BBB" rated (or comparable quality) debt improved to a greater extent than for other investment grade rated (or comparable quality) debt). 5

5 Investment grade securities are securities that are rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Non-investment grade securities are securities that are not rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT - CLASS A SHARES

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 1 in Federated Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund (Class A Shares) (the "Fund") from August 31, 1995 to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 2 and the Lipper Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds Average (LPMDFA). 3

Average Annual Total Return 4 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   

1 Year

0.85%
5 Years

5.21%
10 Years

5.25%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum sales charge of 4.50%.

1 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting the maximum sales charge of 4.50% ($10,000 investment minus $450 sales charge = $9,550). The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBMB and LPMDFA have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the index and average. Indexes are unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, are unaffected by cash flows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or an average.

2 The LBMB is an unmanaged index comprising bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The index includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. It is not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance.

3 The LPMDFA represents the average of the total returns reported by all of the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling into the respective category. These total returns are reported net of expenses and other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a mutual fund's performance.

4 Total return quoted reflects all applicable sales charges.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT - CLASS B SHARES

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 1 in the Federated Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund (Class B Shares) (the "Fund") from March 4, 1997 (start of performance) to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 2 and the Lipper Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds Average (LPMDFA). 3

Average Annual Total Return 4 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   

1 Year

(0.73)%
5 Years

5.03%
Start of Performance (3/4/1997)

4.68%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum contingent deferred sales charge of 5.50% as applicable.

1 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund. The ending value of the Fund does not reflect a contingent deferred sales charge on any redemption over six years from the purchase date. The maximum contingent deferred sales charge is 5.50% of any redemption less than one year from the purchase date. The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBMB and LPMDFA have been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the index and average. Indexes are unmanaged and unlike the Fund, are unaffected by cash flows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index or an average.

2 The LBMB is an unmanaged index comprising bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa. They must have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The index includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. It is not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance.

3 The LPMDFA represents the average of the total returns reported by all of the mutual funds designated by Lipper, Inc. as falling into the respective category. These total returns are reported net of expenses and other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in a mutual fund's performance.

4 Total return quoted reflects all applicable sales charges and contingent deferred sales charges.

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400.

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At August 31, 2005, the Fund's credit-quality ratings composition 1 was as follows:

S&P Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

    Moody's Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

AAA
   
38.1%
Aaa
   
39.1%
AA

12.0%
Aa

8.7%
A

9.1%
A

2.8%
BBB

14.5%
Baa

7.7%
BB

2.6%
Ba

0.0%
B

1.1%
B

1.5%
Not Rated by S&P

22.6%
Not Rated by Moody's

40.2%
   TOTAL

100.0%
   TOTAL

100.0%

1 These tables depict the long-term, credit-quality ratings assigned to the Fund's portfolio holdings by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), each of which is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). These credit-quality ratings are shown without regard to gradations within a given rating category. For example, securities rated "A-" have been included in the "A" rated category. Rated securities that have been prerefunded, but not rated again by the NRSRO, have been included in the "Not rated by..." category.

Rated securities include a security with an obligor and/or credit enhancer that has received a rating from an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt obligations that is comparable in priority and security with the security held by the Fund. Credit-quality ratings are an assessment of the risk that a security will default in payment and do not address other risks presented by the security. Please see the descriptions of credit-quality ratings in the Fund's Statement of Additional Information.

Holdings that are rated only by a different NRSRO than the one identified have been included in the "Not rated by..." category. Of the portfolio's total investments, 11.9% do not have long-term ratings by either of these NRSROs.

2 Percentages are based on total investments, which may differ from the Fund's total net assets used in computing the percentages in the Portfolio of Investments which follows.

Portfolio of Investments

August 31, 2005

Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--97.8%   
Pennsylvania--96.3%
$ 1,300,000 Allegheny County Redevelopment Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.60% (Pittsburgh Mills), 7/1/2023
NR $ 1,372,670
1,500,000 Allegheny County Redevelopment Authority, Tax Increment Bonds (Series 2000A), 6.30% (Waterfront Project), 12/15/2018
NR 1,652,805
4,250,000 Allegheny County, PA Airport Authority, Airport Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1999), 6.125% (Pittsburgh International Airport)/(FGIC INS), 1/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 4,644,400
2,500,000 Allegheny County, PA HDA, Health System Revenue Bonds (Series 2000B), 9.25% (West Penn Allegheny Health System)/(Original Issue Yield: 9.70%), 11/15/2030
B/B1 3,007,125
2,000,000 Allegheny County, PA HDA, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1998A), 5.125% (South Hills Health System)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.34%), 5/1/2023
NR/Baa1 1,981,520
785,000 Allegheny County, PA HDA, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 6.625% (Allegheny General Hospital)/(Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL), 7/1/2009
AAA/#Aaa 841,331
2,000,000 Allegheny County, PA HDA, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Catholic Health East)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 11/15/2032
A/A1 2,101,060
1,500,000 Allegheny County, PA HDA, Revenue Bonds, 5.375% (Ohio Valley General Hospital, PA)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.50%), 1/1/2018
NR/Baa2 1,525,650
4,000,000 Allegheny County, PA HDA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 1997A), 5.60% (UPMC Health System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 4/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 4,224,800
1,000,000 Allegheny County, PA Higher Education Building Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.95% (Chatham College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.97%), 3/1/2032
BBB/NR 1,049,060
1,000,000 Allegheny County, PA Higher Education Building Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002B), 5.25% (Chatham College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.35%), 11/15/2016
BBB/NR 1,021,220
475,000 2 Allegheny County, PA IDA, Cargo Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 6.00% (AFCO Cargo PIT LLC Project), 9/1/2009
NR 468,388
1,000,000 2 Allegheny County, PA IDA, Cargo Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 6.625% (AFCO Cargo PIT LLC Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.75%), 9/1/2024
NR 971,230
3,185,000 Allegheny County, PA IDA, Environmental Improvement Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 5.50% (Marathon Oil Corp.), 12/1/2029
BBB+/Baa1 3,313,992
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 1,250,000 Allegheny County, PA IDA, Environmental Improvement Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 5.60% (Marathon Oil Corp.), 9/1/2030
BBB+/Baa1 $ 1,307,388
1,500,000 Allegheny County, PA IDA, Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1998), 5.75% (Presbyterian SeniorCare-Westminster Place Project), 1/1/2023
NR 1,500,345
935,000 Allegheny County, PA IDA, Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 2001), 6.60% (Residential Resources Inc. Project)/ (Original Issue Yield: 6.75%), 9/1/2031
NR 999,898
3,000,000 Allegheny County, PA Port Authority, Special Revenue Transportation Bonds (Series 1999), 6.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.05%), 3/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 3,318,870
515,000 Allegheny County, PA Residential Finance Agency, SFM Revenue Bonds (Series 2001KK-1), 5.375% (GNMA Collateralized Home Mortgage Program COL), 5/1/2022
NR/Aaa 538,999
515,000 Allegheny County, PA Residential Finance Agency, SFM Revenue Bonds (Series FF-1), 5.90% (GNMA Collateralized Home Mortgage Program COL), 5/1/2020
NR/Aaa 544,607
1,835,000 Allentown, PA Area Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series B), 6.75% (Sacred Heart Hospital of Allentown), 11/15/2015
BB+/Baa3 1,906,565
2,000,000 Bethlehem, PA Area Vocational-Technical School Authority, Guaranteed Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.50% (Bethlehem Area Vocational-Technical School)/(United States Treasury PRF 9/1/2009 @100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.55%), 9/1/2020
NR/Aaa 2,178,880
4,250,000 Bradford County, PA IDA, Solid Waste Disposal Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 4.70% (International Paper Co.), 3/1/2019
BBB/Baa2 4,210,220
1,000,000 Bucks County, PA Community College Authority, College Building Revenue Bonds (Series 1996), 5.50% (Original Issue Yield: 5.70%), 6/15/2017
NR/Aa2 1,042,490
750,000 Bucks County, PA IDA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 6.00% (Pennswood Village)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.12%), 10/1/2027
BBB+/NR 809,062
500,000 Bucks County, PA IDA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 6.00% (Pennswood Village)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.16%), 10/1/2034
BBB+/NR 538,005
1,000,000 Bucks County, PA IDA, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, 4.90% TOBs (Waste Management, Inc.), Mandatory Tender 2/1/2008
BBB/NR 1,024,280
1,580,000 Carbon County, PA IDA, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 6.65% (Panther Creek Partners Project)/(BNP Paribas SA and Union Bank of California LOCs), 5/1/2010
BBB-/NR 1,718,171
1,100,000 Chester County, PA HEFA, Mortgage Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Tel Hai Obligated Group Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 6/1/2025
BBB-/NR 1,104,279
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 1,500,000 Clarion County, PA Hospital Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series 1997), 5.75% (Clarion County Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.95%), 7/1/2017
BBB-/NR $ 1,507,020
1,575,000 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, GO UT Bonds, 6.00% (Original Issue Yield: 6.15%), 7/1/2007
AA/Aa2 1,660,759
1,000,000 Crawford County, PA Hospital Authority, Senior Living Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 6.125% (Wesbury United Methodist Community Obligated Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.32%), 8/15/2019
NR 1,043,410
1,250,000 Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority, College Revenue Bonds (Series A), 5.50% (Dickinson College)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.70%), 11/1/2025
NR/Aaa 1,364,687
1,000,000 Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority, Retirement Community Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 7.125% (Wesley Affiliated Services, Inc. Obligated Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.40%), 1/1/2025
NR 1,106,400
2,800,000 Delaware County, PA Authority, College Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.75% (Cabrini College)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.95%), 7/1/2019
AA/NR 2,992,388
2,650,000 Delaware County, PA Authority, College Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1998A), 5.375% (Neumann College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.48%), 10/1/2018
BBB-/NR 2,725,949
2,875,000 Delaware County, PA Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Elwyn, Inc.)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 6/1/2022
AA/Aa3 3,050,174
1,000,000 Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission, Pennsylvania-New Jersey Bridge System Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), 5.25%, 7/1/2020
A-/A2 1,114,960
1,500,000 Delaware River Port Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 6.00% (FSA INS), 1/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,663,800
2,000,000 Delaware River Port Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.00% (FSA INS), 1/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 2,218,400
10,000,000 Delaware Valley, PA Regional Finance Authority, Local Government Revenue Bonds (Series 1997B), 5.60% (AMBAC INS), 7/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 11,501,100
1,000,000 2 Delaware Valley, PA Regional Finance Authority, Residual Interest Tax-Exempt Securities (PA-1029), 8.23205%, 7/1/2017
NR 1,318,050
2,100,000 Erie County, PA Convention Center Authority, Convention Center Hotel Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (FGIC INS), 1/15/2036
AAA/Aaa 2,231,292
4,100,000 Erie County, PA Hospital Authority, Health Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.90% (St. Mary's Home of Erie)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.05%), 8/15/2019
AA/NR 4,429,804
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 570,000 Erie, PA Higher Education Building Authority, College Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004B), 5.00% (Mercyhurst College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.11%), 3/15/2023
BBB/NR $ 581,503
2,660,000 Greater Nanticoke, PA Area School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (United States Treasury PRF 10/15/2005 @100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.62%), 10/15/2025)
AAA/Aaa 2,669,017
2,000,000 Indiana County, PA IDA, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Indiana University of PA)/(AMBAC INS), 11/1/2029
AAA/Aaa 2,133,920
800,000 Jeannette Health Services Authority, PA, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series A of 1996), 6.00% (Jeannette District Memorial Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.15%), 11/1/2018
BB-/NR 800,376
1,000,000 Lancaster County, PA Hospital Authority, Health Center Revenue Bonds (Series 2001), 5.875% (Willow Valley Retirement Communities)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.95%), 6/1/2031
A-/NR 1,066,260
1,000,000 Lancaster County, PA Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Lancaster General Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.63%), 3/15/2026
A/NR 1,067,160
2,000,000 Lancaster County, PA, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 5.80% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.84%), 5/1/2015
NR/Aaa 2,226,600
250,000 Lancaster, PA IDA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2000A), 7.60% (Garden Spot Villiage Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.70%), 5/1/2022
NR 277,288
1,000,000 Lawrence County, PA IDA, Senior Health and Housing Facilities Revenue Bonds, 7.50% (Shenango Presbyterian SeniorCare Obligated Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.75%), 11/15/2031
NR 1,037,910
1,000,000 Lebanon County, PA Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 5.80% (Good Samaritan Hospital)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.92%), 11/15/2022
BBB+/Baa1 1,085,080
2,000,000 Lehigh County, PA General Purpose Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (St. Lukes Hospital of Bethlehem)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.42%), 8/15/2023
BBB/Baa2 2,108,220
1,000,000 Lehigh-Northampton Airport Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.00% (Lehigh Valley Airport System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.02%), 5/15/2025
NR/Aaa 1,095,490
1,000,000 Luzerne County, PA, UT GO Bonds, 5.625% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.78%), 12/15/2021
AAA/Aaa 1,059,130
825,000 Lycoming County PA Authority, Hospital Lease Revenue Bonds (Series B), 6.50% (Divine Providence Hospital, PA)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.70%), 7/1/2022
NR 828,036
1,000,000 Lycoming County PA Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (Divine Providence Hospital, PA)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 11/15/2022
AAA/NR 1,024,720
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 1,000,000 McKean County, PA Hospital Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Bradford Regional Medical Center)/(American Capital Access INS), 10/1/2030
A/NR $ 1,036,810
1,000,000 Monroe County, PA Hospital Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (Pocono Medical Center)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.60%), 1/1/2022
AA/NR 1,071,000
2,360,000 Monroe County, PA Hospital Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 5.125% (Pocono Medical Center)/(United States Treasury PRF 7/1/2008 @100)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.40%), 7/1/2015
AAA/Aaa 2,492,184
1,000,000 Monroe County, PA Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.00% (Pocono Medical Center)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.17%), 1/1/2043
BBB+/NR 1,082,400
1,250,000 Montgomery County, PA Higher Education & Health Authority Hospital, Revenue Bonds, 7.25% (Philadelphia Geriatric Center)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.472%), 12/1/2024
NR 1,353,488
1,000,000 Montgomery County, PA IDA, Fixed Rate Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2005), 6.25% (Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.375%), 2/1/2035
NR 1,060,530
2,250,000 Montgomery County, PA IDA, Retirement Community Revenue Bonds (Series 1996B), 5.75% (Adult Communities Total Services, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.98%), 11/15/2017
BBB+/NR 2,347,515
1,000,000 Montgomery County, PA IDA, Retirement Community Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1996A), 5.875% (Adult Communities Total Services, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.125%), 11/15/2022
BBB+/NR 1,037,060
1,000,000 Mount Lebanon, PA Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.625% (St. Clair Memorial Hospital)/ (Original Issue Yield: 5.75%), 7/1/2032
A-/NR 1,064,570
500,000 Mt. Pleasant Borough, PA Business District Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 1997), 5.75% (Frick Hospital)/(United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2007 @102)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 12/1/2017
NR 537,070
2,300,000 Mt. Pleasant Borough, PA Business District Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 1997), 5.75% (Frick Hospital)/(United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2007 @102)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 12/1/2027
NR 2,470,522
1,000,000 North Hills, PA School District, GO Bonds, (Series 2000), 5.50% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.576%), 7/15/2024
AAA/Aaa 1,105,960
1,075,000 North Penn, PA School District, Refunding Revenue Bonds, 6.20% (Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL), 3/1/2007
NR/#Aaa 1,100,521
1,000,000 Northumberland County PA IDA, Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2002B), 5.50% (NHS Youth Service, Inc.)/(American Capital Access INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.80%), 2/15/2033
A/NR 1,066,380
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 3,000,000 Norwin, PA School District, UT GO Bonds, 6.00% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.12%), 4/1/2024
AAA/Aaa $ 3,345,210
1,000,000 Pennsylvania Convention Center Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.70% (Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.843%), 9/1/2016
AAA/Aaa 1,213,890
1,000,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Exempt Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 1997B), 6.125% (National Gypsum Co.), 11/1/2027
NR 1,065,260
1,000,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Exempt Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 6.75% (Reliant Energy, Inc.), 12/1/2036
NR/B1 1,079,480
2,500,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Resource Recovery Revenue Bonds (Series A), 6.40% (Northampton Generating), 1/1/2009
BB/NR 2,516,800
2,000,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 1998A), 5.25% (Northwestern Human Services, Inc.)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.668%), 6/1/2028
BB+/NR 1,739,060
1,000,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Revenue Bonds (Series 2000), 5.90% (Dr. Gertrude A. Barber Center, Inc.)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 12/1/2030
AA/NR 1,096,790
1,000,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 4.70% TOBs (Waste Management, Inc.), Mandatory Tender 11/1/2014
BBB/NR 1,022,600
1,000,000 Pennsylvania HFA, SFM Revenue Bonds (Series 2001-72A), 5.25%, 4/1/2021
AA+/Aa2 1,035,770
660,000 Pennsylvania HFA, SFM Revenue Bonds, (Series 62A), 5.50%, 10/1/2022
AA+/Aa2 686,083
2,590,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, Capital Acquisition Revenue Bonds, 6.125% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 12/15/2019
AAA/Aaa 2,955,630
2,000,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, College and University Revenue Bonds, 5.625% (University of the Arts)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.78%), 3/15/2025
AA/NR 2,141,780
2,000,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1996), 7.20% (Thiel College)/ (United States Treasury PRF 5/15/2006 @102), 5/15/2026
NR 2,097,400
1,500,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2001A), 6.00% (UPMC Health System)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.10%), 1/15/2022
A+/NR 1,657,695
1,330,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.25% (Clarion University Foundation, Inc.)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS), 7/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 1,452,466
1,490,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003AA1), 5.25% (Dickinson College)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 11/1/2018
AA/NR 1,607,814
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 1,350,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.25% (Philadelphia University)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.32%), 6/1/2032
BBB/Baa2 $ 1,375,016
1,625,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (Slippery Rock University Foundation)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS), 7/1/2037
AAA/Aaa 1,712,003
1,160,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series AA2), 5.25% (Lycoming College)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 11/1/2024
AA/NR 1,240,922
2,000,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series N), 5.875% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.913%), 6/15/2021
AAA/Aaa 2,047,740
750,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Widener University), 7/15/2039
BBB+/NR 774,930
1,000,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Widener University)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.42%), 7/15/2024
BBB+/NR 1,053,610
3,150,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, 4.65% (Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.77%), 12/1/2028
A/NR 3,206,952
450,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Lycoming College)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 11/1/2027
AA/Aa3 482,076
1,250,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Ursinus College)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 1/1/2027
AA/NR 1,328,188
2,495,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.25% (Philadelphia University)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 6/1/2024
AA/NR 2,775,388
1,500,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 6.00% (UPMC Health System)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.16%), 1/15/2031
A+/NR 1,657,695
1,500,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Student Housing Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.00% (California University of Pennsylvania)/(American Capital Access INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.08%), 7/1/2023
A/NR 1,547,460
1,500,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, University Revenue Bonds (Series 1997), 5.45% (University of the Arts)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.58%), 3/15/2017
AA/NR 1,530,900
1,500,000 Pennsylvania State IDA, Economic Development Revenue Bonds (Series 2002), 5.50% (AMBAC INS), 7/1/2020
AAA/Aaa 1,687,815
1,500,000 Pennsylvania State University, Revenue Bonds, 5.00%, 9/1/2029
AA/Aa2 1,607,940
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 1,600,000 Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, Senior Living Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.625% (PresbyHomes Germantown/Morrisville), 7/1/2035
NR/Baa2 $ 1,639,520
2,120,000 Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Development, Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 2001B), 5.50% (FSA INS), 10/1/2021
AAA/Aaa 2,362,676
3,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Development, Revenue Bonds (Series 2001B), 5.25% (Philadelphia Corp. for Aging Project)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.43%), 7/1/2023
AAA/Aaa 3,226,770
1,275,000 Philadelphia, PA Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 1997), 5.75% (Jeanes Hospital, PA)/(Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.80%), 7/1/2008
AAA/#Aaa 1,367,884
1,080,000 Philadelphia, PA Redevelopment Authority, MFH Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 5.45% (Woodstock Mutual Homes, Inc.)/(FHA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.468%), 2/1/2023
NR/Aa2 1,108,717
2,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Redevelopment Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (FGIC INS), 4/15/2018
AAA/Aaa 2,225,160
950,000 Philadelphia, PA Redevelopment Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.50% (FGIC INS), 4/15/2019
AAA/Aaa 1,056,951
1,250,000 Philadelphia, PA Redevelopment Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.50% (Beech Student Housing Complex)/(American Capital Access INS), 7/1/2019
A/NR 1,351,563
1,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Redevelopment Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), 5.625% (Beech Student Housing Complex)/(American Capital Access INS), 7/1/2023
A/NR 1,081,190
1,000,000 Philadelphia, PA School District, UT GO Bonds (Series 2002B), 5.625% (United States Treasury PRF 8/1/2012 @100), 8/1/2022
AAA/Aaa 1,136,610
9,500,000 Philadelphia, PA, Airport Revenue Bonds (Series 1997B), 5.50% (Philadelphia Airport System)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.65%), 6/15/2017
AAA/Aaa 9,987,540
2,880,000 Pittsburgh, PA Public Parking Authority, Parking Revenue Bonds (Series 2000), 6.00% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.02%), 12/1/2020
AAA/Aaa 3,236,342
765,000 Pittsburgh, PA Urban Redevelopment Authority, Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 1997A), 6.15%, 10/1/2016
AAA/Aa1 783,199
355,000 Pittsburgh, PA Urban Redevelopment Authority, Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 1997C), 5.35%, 10/1/2009
AAA/Aa1 372,232
1,075,000 Pittsburgh, PA Urban Redevelopment Authority, Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 1997C), 5.90%, 10/1/2022
AAA/Aa1 1,119,935
2,855,000 Pittsburgh, PA, LT GO Bonds (Series 1999A), 5.75% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.852%), 9/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 3,125,740
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 5,000,000 2 Pittsburgh, PA, Residual Interest Tax-Exempt Securities (Series PA 961), 7.72055% (AMBAC INS), 9/1/2015
NR $ 6,104,650
1,500,000 Pittsburgh, PA, UT GO Bonds (Series 1999A), 5.75% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.94%), 9/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 1,642,245
1,500,000 Pittsburgh, PA, UT GO Bonds (Series 2005A), 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 9/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 1,634,910
2,950,000 Pottsville, PA Hospital Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, 5.625% (Pottsville Hospital and Warne Clinic)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.75%), 7/1/2024
BBB-/NR 2,951,652
2,165,000 Radnor Township, PA, UT GO Bonds (Series 2004AA), 5.125%, 7/15/2027
NR/Aa1 2,339,932
2,040,000 Riverside, PA School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.57%), 10/15/2020
AAA/Aaa 2,261,197
1,500,000 Sayre, PA, Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.75% (Guthrie Healthcare System, PA)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.90%), 12/1/2021
A-/NR 1,626,480
1,000,000 Sayre, PA, Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.875% (Guthrie Healthcare System, PA)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.00%), 12/1/2031
A-/NR 1,077,710
1,000,000 Scranton, PA, UT GO Bonds (Series 2001C), 7.10% (United States Treasury PRF 9/1/2011 @100)/(Original Issue Yield: 7.35%), 9/1/2031
NR 1,189,260
700,000 Shaler, PA School District Authority, GO UT Bonds, 6.25% (Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL), 4/15/2008
AAA/NR 730,625
2,000,000 Somerset County, PA Hospital Authority, Hospital Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1997B), 5.375% (Somerset Community Hospital)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.68%), 3/1/2017
AA/NR 2,074,380
540,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.625% (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)/(Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL), 5/15/2026
NR/Aa3 598,747
2,460,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.625% (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)/(United States Treasury PRF 5/15/2011 @101), 5/15/2026
NR/Aa3 2,781,694
2,000,000 Southeastern, PA Transportation Authority, Special Revenue Bonds, 5.375% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.70%), 3/1/2017
AAA/Aaa 2,106,500
500,000 St. Mary Hospital Authority, PA, Health System Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.00% (Catholic Health East)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.15%), 11/15/2021
A/A1 526,930
1,000,000 St. Mary Hospital Authority, PA, Health System Revenue Bonds (Series 2004B), 5.375% (Catholic Health East)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.42%), 11/15/2034
A/A1 1,068,080
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued   
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 1,000,000 St. Mary Hospital Authority, PA, Health System Revenue Bonds (Series 2004B), 5.50% (Catholic Health East), 11/15/2024
A/A1 $ 1,089,170
500,000 State Public School Building Authority, PA, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Montgomery County, PA Community College)/(AMBAC INS), 5/1/2024
NR/Aaa 536,620
1,000,000 2 Susquehanna, PA Area Regional Airport Authority, Airport Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.50% (Aero Harrisburg)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 1/1/2024
NR 931,000
1,245,000 Union County, PA Higher Educational Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25% (Bucknell University), 4/1/2021
NR/Aa3 1,378,489
1,665,000 Union County, PA Higher Educational Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.25% (Bucknell University), 4/1/2022
NR/Aa3 1,843,521
1,250,000 Union County, PA Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (Evangelical Community Hospital)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS), 8/1/2024
AA/Aa3 1,333,800
400,000 Washington County, PA Authority, Lease Revenue Bonds, 7.875% (Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL), 12/15/2018
AAA/Aaa 562,100
1,885,000 West Shore, PA Area Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.15% (Holy Spirit Hospital), 1/1/2020
BBB+/NR 2,070,616
1,000,000 West Shore, PA Area Hospital Authority, Revenue Bonds, 6.25% (Holy Spirit Hospital)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.30%), 1/1/2032
BBB+/NR 1,092,850
1,000,000 West View, PA Municipal Authority, Special Obligation Bonds, 9.50% (Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL), 11/15/2014
AAA/#Aaa 1,315,070
1,000,000 Westmoreland County, PA IDA, Health Care Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 2000B), 8.00% (Redstone Presbyterian Seniorcare Obligated Group)/(Original Issue Yield: 8.25%), 11/15/2023
NR 1,105,880
170,000 Westmoreland County, PA Municipal Authority, Special Obligation Bonds, 9.125% (Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL), 7/1/2010

AAA/#Aaa


187,469
   TOTAL




258,818,192
Puerto Rico--1.5%
2,000,000 2 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Drivers (Series 266), 8.2089% (FSA INS), 7/1/2015
AAA/NR 2,651,500
1,000,000 2 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Residual Interest Tax-Exempt Securities (Series PA 331B), 7.78959% (AMBAC INS), 1/1/2011

NR


1,310,630
   TOTAL




3,962,130
   TOTAL MUNICIPALS BONDS (IDENTIFIED COST $245,032,110)




262,780,322
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating


1


Value
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--1.8%
Pennsylvania--0.6%
$ 1,700,000 Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Development Daily VRDNs (Newcourtland Elder Services)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC)

NR/VMIG1

$
1,700,000
Puerto Rico--1.2%
3,200,000 Puerto Rico Government Development Bank (GDB) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Credit Suisse, Zurich LIQ)

A-1/VMIG1


3,200,000
   TOTAL SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS
(AT AMORTIZED COST)





4,900,000
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--99.6%
(IDENTIFIED COST $249,932,110) 3





267,680,322
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.4%




1,095,129
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%



$
268,775,451

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 13.4% of the Fund's portfolio as calculated based upon total portfolio market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 Current credit ratings are unaudited.

2 Denotes a restricted security, including securities purchased under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities, all of which have been deemed liquid by criteria approved by the Fund's Board of Trustees, unless registered under the Act or exempted from registration, may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. At August 31, 2005, these securities amounted to $13,755,448 which represents 5.1% of total net assets.

3 The cost of investments for federal tax purposes amounts to $249,906,973.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at August 31, 2005.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
COL --Collateralized
EDFA --Economic Development Financing Authority
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHA --Federal Housing Administration
FSA --Financial Security Assurance
GNMA --Government National Mortgage Association
GO --General Obligation
HDA --Hospital Development Authority
HEFA --Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
INS --Insured
LIQ --Liquidity Agreement
LOC(s) --Letter(s) of Credit
LT --Limited Tax
MFH --Multi-family Housing
PRF --Prerefunded
SFM --Single Family Mortgage
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
UT --Unlimited Tax
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

August 31, 2005

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at value (identified cost $249,932,110)
$ 267,680,322
Cash
99,512
Income receivable
3,936,272
Receivable for investments sold
100,000
Receivable for shares sold





502,174

   TOTAL ASSETS





272,318,280

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 2,756,201
Payable for shares redeemed
218,469
Income distribution payable
392,448
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fee
552
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
38,042
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
53,137
Accrued expenses


83,980




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





3,542,829

Net assets for 22,753,976 shares outstanding




$
268,775,451

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 259,433,414
Net unrealized appreciation of investments
17,748,212
Accumulated net realized loss on investments, futures contracts and swap contracts
(8,342,537 )
Accumulated net investment income (loss)





(63,638
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
268,775,451

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share
Class A Shares:
Net asset value per share ($209,005,435 ÷ 17,693,585 shares outstanding) no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$11.81

Offering price per share (100/95.50 of $11.81) 1





$12.37

Redemption proceeds per share





$11.81

Class B Shares:
Net asset value per share ($59,770,016 ÷ 5,060,391 shares outstanding) no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$11.81

Offering price per share





$11.81

Redemption proceeds per share (94.50/100 of $11.81) 1





$11.16

1 See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended August 31, 2005

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
14,147,172

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 1,065,911
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
213,777
Custodian fees
14,962
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
130,377
Directors'/Trustees' fees
3,676
Auditing fees
19,187
Legal fees
8,194
Portfolio accounting fees
95,499
Distribution services fee--Class B Shares (Note 5)
477,930
Shareholder services fee--Class A Shares (Note 5)
496,527
Shareholder services fee--Class B Shares (Note 5)
159,310
Share registration costs
56,912
Printing and postage
25,900
Insurance premiums
9,764
Miscellaneous






4,613





   TOTAL EXPENSES






2,782,539





Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (239,310 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(10,721 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Class A Shares


(30,193
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS






(280,224
)




Net expenses










2,502,315

Net investment income










11,644,857

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and Futures Contracts:
Net realized gain on investments
466,577
Net realized loss on futures contracts
(229,467 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments










2,113,501

Net realized and unrealized gain on investments and futures contracts










2,350,611

Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
13,995,468

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended August 31
   

2005

   

2004

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 11,644,857 $ 12,190,240
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and swap contracts
237,110 (2,462,047 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments, futures contracts, and swap contracts


2,113,501



7,154,292

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


13,995,468



16,882,485

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Class A Shares
(9,306,696 ) (9,314,438 )
Class B Shares


(2,423,083
)


(2,613,590
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(11,729,779
)


(11,928,028
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
36,645,054 45,948,540
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
6,433,591 6,331,273
Cost of shares redeemed


(42,339,992
)


(72,231,286
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


738,653



(19,951,473
)
Change in net assets


3,004,342



(14,997,016
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


265,771,109



280,768,125

End of period (including accumulated net investment income (loss) of $(63,638) and $25,159, respectively)

$
268,775,451


$
265,771,109

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

August 31, 2005

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of seven portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a non-diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal regular income tax (federal regular income tax does not include the federal alternative minimum tax) and the personal income taxes imposed by the state of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania municipalities. Interest from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations. The Fund offers two classes of shares: Class A Shares and Class B Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

Municipal bonds are valued by an independent pricing service, taking into consideration yield, liquidity, risk, credit quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, and any other factors or market data the pricing service deems relevant. The Fund generally values short-term securities according to prices furnished by an independent pricing service, except that short-term securities with remaining maturities of less than 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at amortized cost. Prices furnished by an independent pricing service are intended to be indicative of the mean between the bid and asked prices currently offered to institutional investors for the securities. Securities for which no quotations are readily available are valued at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the "Trustees").

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses, and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized/accreted for financial statement purposes.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Swap Contracts

The Fund may enter into swap contracts. A swap is an exchange of cash payments between the Fund and another party, which is based on a specific financial index. The value of the swap is adjusted daily and the change in value is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When a swap contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. The swap contracts entered into by the Fund are on a forward settling basis. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had no realized gains (losses) on swap contracts.

Risks may arise upon entering into these agreements from the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of their contract and from unanticipated changes in the value of the financial index on which the swap agreement is based. The Fund uses swaps for hedging purposes to reduce its exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had no open swap contracts.

Futures Contracts

The Fund periodically may sell bond interest rate futures contracts to manage duration and to potentially reduce transaction costs. Upon entering into a bond interest rate futures contract with a broker, the Fund is required to deposit in a segregated account a specified amount of cash or U.S. government securities. Futures contracts are valued daily and unrealized gains or losses are recorded in a "variation margin" account. Daily, the Fund receives from or pays to the broker a specified amount of cash based upon changes in the variation margin account. When a contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. Futures contracts have market risks, including the risk that the change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had realized losses on future contracts of $229,467.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had no open futures contracts.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from such registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund's restricted securities are valued at the price provided by dealers in the secondary market or, if no market prices are available, at the fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Trustees.

Additional information on restricted securities, excluding securities purchased under Rule 144A that have been deemed liquid by the Trustees, held at August 31, 2005, is as follows:

Security
   
Acquisition Date
   
Acquisition Cost
Allegheny County, PA IDA, Cargo Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 6.00% (AFCO Cargo PIT LLC Project), 9/1/2009

9/23/1999

$ 475,000
Allegheny County, PA IDA, Cargo Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 6.625% (AFCO Cargo PIT LLC Project)/(Original Issue Yield: 6.75%), 9/1/2024

9/23/1999

$ 984,950
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Residual Interest Tax-Exempt Securities (Series PA 331B), 7.78959% (AMBAC INS), 1/1/2011

3/3/1998

$1,158,780
Susquehanna, PA Area Regional Airport Authority, Airport Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 1999), 5.50% (Aero Harrisburg)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 1/1/2024

4/14/1999

$ 954,500

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

Class A Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
2,835,318 $ 33,382,161 3,429,994 $ 40,251,587
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

414,717

4,876,635

405,085

4,737,780
Shares redeemed

(2,636,006
)


(30,998,108
)

(5,042,726
)


(59,139,421
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS A SHARE TRANSACTIONS


614,029





$
7,260,688




(1,207,647
)



$
(14,150,054
)
Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

Class B Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
277,105 $ 3,262,893 485,452 $ 5,696,953
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

132,408


1,556,956

136,271


1,593,493
Shares redeemed

(963,817
)


(11,341,884
)

(1,120,327
)


(13,091,865
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS B SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(554,304
)



$
(6,522,035
)


(498,604
)



$
(5,801,419
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


59,725





$
738,653




(1,706,251
)



$
(19,951,473
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are due to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization on debt securities.

For the year ended August 31, 2005, permanent differences identified and reclassified among the components of net assets were as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Accumulated Net
Investment Income (Loss)



   
Accumulated Net
Realized Gain (Loss)

$(3,875)

$3,875

Net investment income (loss), net realized gains (losses), and net assets were not affected by this reclassification.

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004, was as follows:


   
2005
   
2004
Tax-exempt income

$11,729,779

$11,928,028

As of August 31, 2005, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income
   
$
921,848
Net unrealized appreciation

$
17,773,349
Capital loss carryforward

$
8,367,675

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable to differing treatments for discount accretion/premium amortization of debt securities.

At August 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $249,906,973. The net unrealized appreciation of investments for federal tax purposes was $17,773,349. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $17,994,546 and net unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $221,197.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $8,367,675 which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire as follows:

Expiration Year
   
Expiration Amount
2008

$1,170,431
2009

$2,804,527
2010

$2,171,230
2012

$ 236,977
2013

$1,984,510

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Adviser voluntarily waived $239,310 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of all Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee



   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares and Class B Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses according to the following schedule annually, to compensate FSC:

Share Class Name


   
Percentage of Average Daily
Net Assets of Class

Class A Shares

0.40%
Class B Shares

0.75%

FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. Rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay fees to FSC and FSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund. Class A Shares did not incur a distribution services fee for the year ended August 31, 2005.

Sales Charges

For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC retained $54,194 in sales charges from the sale of Class A Shares. FSC also retained $5,228 of contingent deferred sales charges relating to redemptions of Class A Shares. See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Services Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares and Class B Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), a subsidiary of Federated Investors, Inc., for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Under certain agreements, rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay Service Fees to FSSC and FSSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. This voluntary waiver can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC voluntarily waived $30,193 of its fee. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC retained $48,443 of fees paid by the Fund.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $57,600,000 and $53,600,000, respectively.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations, for the year ended August 31, 2005, were as follows:

Purchases
   
$
30,147,160
Sales

$
32,506,435

7. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Since the Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers located in one state, it will be more susceptible to factors adversely affecting issuers of that state than would be a comparable tax-exempt mutual fund that invests nationally. In order to reduce the credit risk associated with such factors, at August 31, 2005, 51.4% of the securities in the portfolio of investments is backed by letters of credit or bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The largest percentage of investments insured by or supported (backed) by a letter of credit from any one institution or agency was 10.1% of total investments.

8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated (Funds) were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and will respond appropriately. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At August 31, 2005, 100.0% of the distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal alternative minimum tax.

The Fund received a copy of a proposed adverse determination letter issued by the Internal Revenue Service to the issuer of the following security. In the event that this determination is not reversed or otherwise resolved by the issuer, the Fund may need to report the income from this security as taxable income.

Security
   
Market Value
Westmoreland County, PA Municipal Authority, Special Obligation Bonds, 9.125% (Escrowed In U.S. Treasuries COL) 7/1/2010

$187,469

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FEDERATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES INCOME TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Federated Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust as of August 31, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of August 31, 2005, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 18, 2005

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund ( i.e. , "Interested" Board members) and those who are not ( i.e. , "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2004, the Trust comprised seven portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 44 investment companies (comprising 133 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Chairman and Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.; Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1998
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc. (marketing communications and technology) (prior to 9/1/00).

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue and Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Began Serving

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard J. Thomas
Birth Date: June 17, 1954
TREASURER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; held various management positions within Funds Financial Services Division of Federated Investors, Inc.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE CHAIRMAN
Began serving: August 2002
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since April 1997. Ms. Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



J. Scott Albrecht
Birth Date: June 1, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: November 1998
J. Scott Albrecht has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since March 1995. He is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Albrecht joined Federated in 1989. He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1997 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. He was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Albrecht is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Public Management from Carnegie Mellon University.



Board Review of Advisory Contract

As required by the Act, the Fund's Board has reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considers many factors, among the most material of which are: the Fund's investment objectives; the Adviser's management philosophy, personnel, processes, and investment and operating strategies; long-term performance; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the range and quality of services provided to the Fund and its shareholders by the Federated organization in addition to investment advisory services; and the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds.

In its decision to appoint or renew the Adviser, the Board is mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognizes that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's "selection" or approval of the Adviser must reflect the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund. The Board also considers the compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This includes fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. In this regard, the Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Adviser's service and fee. The Fund's Board is aware of these factors and is guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considers and weighs these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. In this regard, the Board requests and receives substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization. Federated provides much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnishes additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board's evaluation of an advisory contract is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, personnel, and processes; operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities; the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The evaluation process is evolutionary, reflecting continually developing considerations. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focuses on comparisons with other similar mutual funds (rather than non-mutual fund products or services) because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle already chosen by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group may be a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing on the Fund's investment program, which would in turn assist the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services are such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract.

The Board also receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses. Although the Board considers the profitability of the Federated organization as a whole, it does not evaluate, on a fund-by-fund basis, Federated's "profitability" and/or "costs" (which would include an assessment as to whether "economies of scale" would be realized if the fund were to grow to some sufficient size). In the Board's view, the cost of performing advisory services on a fund-specific basis is both difficult to estimate satisfactorily and a relatively minor consideration in its overall evaluation. Analyzing isolated funds would require constructed allocations of the costs of shared resources and operations based on artificial assumptions that are inconsistent with the existing relationships within a large and diversified family of funds that receive advisory and other services from the same organization. Although the Board is always eager to discover any genuine "economies of scale," its experience has been that such "economies" are likely to arise only when a fund grows dramatically, and becomes and remains very large in size. Even in these instances, purchase and redemption activity, as well as the presence of expense limitations (if any), may offset any perceived economies. As suggested above, the Board considers the information it receives about the Fund's performance and expenses as compared to an appropriate set of similar competing funds to be more relevant.

The Board bases its decision to approve an advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above are relevant to every Federated fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provide a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Pennsylvania Municipal Income Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 313923708
Cusip 313923807

28995 (10/05)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2005 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Vermont Municipal Income Fund

A Portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

August 31, 2005

Class A Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
BOARD REVIEW OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004
1
   
2003
1
   
2002
1
   
2001
1,2
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$10.15 $10.10 $10.27 $10.22 $10.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.33 0.32 0.34 0.38 0.37
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
on investments

(0.10
)

0.06


(0.17
)

0.05


0.22

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.23


0.38


0.17


0.43


0.59

Less Distributions:
Distribution from net investment income
(0.33 ) (0.32 ) (0.34 ) (0.38 ) (0.37 )
Distributions from net realized gain
on investments

(0.04
)

(0.01
)

--


--


--

   TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

(0.37
)

(0.33
)

(0.34
)

(0.38
)

(0.37
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$10.01


$10.15


$10.10


$10.27


$10.22

Total Return 3

2.26
%

3.75
%

1.74
%

4.33
%

6.00
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.80
%

0.78
%

0.84
%

0.81
%

0.91
% 4
Net investment income

3.26
%

3.14
%

3.30
%

3.75
%

3.96
% 4
Expense waiver/reimbursement 5

0.58
%

0.43
%

0.26
%

0.30
%

0.46
% 4
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$57,272


$71,015


$80,497


$82,132


$86,924

Portfolio turnover

33
%

25
%

20
%

7
%

11
%

1 Note that the Fund is the successor to the Banknorth Vermont Municipal Bond Fund (Former Fund). The Former Fund was reorganized into the Fund on August 27, 2004. The Fund had no investment operations prior to the date of the reorganization. The Former Fund was established on October 2, 2000. The Former Fund was the successor to a portfolio of assets of CF Vermont Tax Exempt Fund (Common Trust Fund), a common trust fund managed by the Former Fund's investment adviser, Banknorth Investment Advisors. The Common Trust Fund's portfolio of assets was transferred to the Former Fund on October 2, 2000 in exchange for the Former Fund's shares. Please see the Fund's prospectus, statement of additional information and annual report for further information regarding the reorganization, Former Fund and Common Trust Fund.

2 Reflects operations for the period from October 2, 2000 (date of initial public investment) to August 31, 2001.

3 Based on net asset value, which does not reflect the sales charge, redemption fee, or contingent deferred sales charge, if applicable. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

4 Computed on an annualized basis.

5 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from March 1, 2005 to August 31, 2005.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sale charges (loads) on purchase or redemption payments. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


   
Beginning
Account Value
3/1/2005

   
Ending
Account Value
8/31/2005

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,016.90

$4.07
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,021.17

$4.08

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio of 0.80%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

The fund's total return, based on net asset value, for the 12-month reporting period was 2.26% for Class A Shares. The total return of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB), 1 the fund's benchmark index, was 5.31% for the 12-month reporting period. The fund's total return reflected actual cash flows, transaction costs, and other expenses which were not reflected in the total return of the LBMB.

The fund's investment strategy focused on: (a) the effective duration of the portfolio (which indicates the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates); (b) the selection of securities with different maturities (expressed by a yield curve showing the relative yield of similar securities with different maturities); (c) the allocation of the portfolio among securities of similar issuers (referred to as sectors); and (d) the credit quality of portfolio securities. 2 These were the most significant factors affecting the fund's performance relative to the LBMB.

The following discussion will focus on the performance of the fund's Class A Shares. The 2.26% total return of the Class A Shares for the reporting period consisted of 3.64% of tax-exempt dividends and 1.38% of price depreciation. 3

MARKET OVERVIEW

The reporting period was characterized by a flattening yield curve, tightening credit spreads and a large supply of new tax-exempt municipal bonds.

During the reporting period, the Federal Reserve Board (the "Fed") continued tightening interest rates, raising the Federal Funds Target Rate from 1.50% in August 2004 to 3.50% in August 2005. Consequently, interest rates throughout the short end of the yield curve rose as well. According to Municipal Market Data (MMD), yields on AAA-rated general obligation tax-exempt municipal bonds rose by 133 basis points for 1 year-maturity bonds, and tapered to a 4 basis point increase for 9-year maturity bonds.

1 The LBMB is the broad-based securities market index for the fund. The LBMB is a broad market performance benchmark for the tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBMB, bonds must have a minimum credit rating of Baa, have an outstanding par value of at least $3 million and be issued as part of a transaction of at least $50 million. The LBMB includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Indexes are unmanaged, and it is not possible to invest directly in an index.

2 Bond prices are sensitive to changes in interest rates and a rise in interest rates can cause a decline in their prices.

3 Income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

During the reporting period, long-term interest rates fell by as much as 53 basis points according to MMD. A variety of factors appeared to come together to cause long-term interest rates to fall in the face of Fed's tightening of interest rates. High oil prices and signs of a slowing economy appeared to dampen inflation fears. At the same time, continued international turmoil and excess foreign capital kept the demand high for U.S. Treasury securities. The net effect was that the yield spread between 1- and 30-year AAA-rated general obligation tax-exempt bonds fell from 322 basis points to 141 basis points, and the tax-exempt municipal yield curve flattened, during the reporting period (that is, while securities provided higher incremental income or yield as maturities became longer, the amount of the increase in incremental income was less or flattened).

Credit spreads (the yield difference between AAA-rated tax-exempt municipal bonds and bonds of lower-credit quality and similar maturity) tightened significantly during the reporting period. According to Lehman Brothers, Inc., the credit spread between their high-yield municipal index, the Lehman Brothers Non-Investment Grade Municipal Bond Index, 4 and the LBMB tightened from 313 basis points to 222 basis points. 5

The 12-month reporting period also saw a large supply of new tax-exempt municipal bonds. During calendar year 2004, issuance of new tax-exempt municipal bonds was the second-highest ever. This followed the record new issuance of tax-exempt municipal bonds in 2003. Issuance from January 1, 2005 through July 31, 2005 appeared to keep pace with the previous two calendar years.

During the reporting period, according to MMD, credit spreads on Vermont tax-exempt bonds widened during the reporting period by 2 to 4 basis points versus their national counterparts. Supply of new Vermont tax-exempt bonds fell substantially during the first eight months of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004.

4 The Lehman Brothers Non-Investment Grade Municipal Bond Index (LBNIGMBI) is a broad market performance benchmark for the high yield tax-exempt bond market. To be included in the LBNIGMBI, bonds must be non-rated or be rated Ba1 or below, have been issued as part of a transaction of at least $20 million, have an outstanding part value of at least $3 million, and have a remaining maturity of at least 1 year.

5 Investment-grade securities are securities that are rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Non-investment grade (or high yield) securities are securities that are not rated at least "BBB" or unrated securities of a comparable quality. Credit ratings are an indication of the risk that a security will default. They do not protect a security from credit risk. Lower-rated bonds typically offer higher yields to help compensate investors for the increased risk associated with them. Among these risks are lower creditworthiness, greater price volatility, more risk to principal and income than with higher-rated securities and increased possibilities of default.

DURATION 6 AND YIELD CURVE/MATURITY

As determined at the end of the reporting period, the fund's dollar-weighted average duration was 4.8 years. Duration management is a significant component of the fund's investment strategy. The fund's duration was maintained short of the duration of the LBMB during the reporting period. The fund's duration negatively impacted the fund's performance relative to the LBMB. The fund's use of Treasury futures contacts to adjust portfolio duration also negatively impacted the fund's performance. These negative impacts on the fund's performance resulted from the rally in longer-maturity bonds, which generally performed better than shorter-maturity bonds during the reporting period.

SECTOR

During the reporting period, the fund's best performing sectors were lease revenue, special tax, and insured bonds. The lease revenue and special tax bond sectors benefited from tightening credit spreads, while insured bonds tended to have longer maturities, and, hence, benefited from falling long term interest rates. Lagging sectors for the fund included education, general obligation and refunded bonds, which were higher-quality sectors which did not benefit from the tightening of credit spreads. Due to the fund's overweight position in the better performing sectors, sector allocation positively impacted the fund's
performance relative to the LBMB.

CREDIT QUALITY

The fund maintained a high-quality portfolio, with over 90% of the portfolio rated in one of the three highest rating categories (AAA, AA, and A) as of the end of the reporting period. Given the tightening of credit spreads in lower-quality, tax-exempt bonds, the fund's positioning had a negative impact on the fund's performance relative to the LBMB because higher-quality, tax-exempt bonds did not perform as well as lower-quality, tax-exempt bonds during the reporting period.

6 Duration is a measure of a security's price sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Securities with longer durations are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with shorter durations.

GROWTH OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT 1

The graph below illustrates the hypothetical investment of $10,000 2 in Federated Vermont Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund") from August 31, 1995 to August 31, 2005, compared to the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index (LBMB). 3

Average Annual Total Return 4 for the Period Ended 8/31/2005
   


1 Year

(2.36
)%
5 Years

2.46
%
10 Years

3.15
%

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance and after-tax returns, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400. Returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Mutual funds are not obligations of or guaranteed by any bank and are not federally insured. Total returns shown include the maximum sales charge of 4.50% .

1 Federated Vermont Municipal Income Fund is the successor to Banknorth Vermont Municipal Income Fund (Former Fund). The Former Fund was established on October 2, 2000, and was reorganized into the Fund on August 27, 2004. The Former Fund was the successor to a portfolio of assets of CF Vermont Tax Exempt Fund (Common Trust Fund), a common trust fund managed by the Former adviser, Banknorth Investment Advisers, which was transferred to the Fund on October 2, 2000 in exchange for Fund shares. The quoted returns are the returns of the Former Fund for periods before October 2, 2000, adjusted to reflect the Fund's expenses. The Common Trust Fund was not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") and therefore was not subject to certain investment restrictions that are imposed by the 1940 Act. If the Common Trust Fund had been registered under the 1940 Act, performance may have been adversely affected.

2 Represents a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund after deducting the maximum sales charge of 3.75% ($10,000 investment minus $375 sales charge = $9,625) which was effective on October 2, 2000. From December 1, 2003 through August 26, 2004, the Fund imposed no sales charge. Effective August 27, 2004 the maximum sales charge has been increased to 4.50%. The Fund's performance assumes the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. The LBMB has been adjusted to reflect reinvestment of dividends on securities in the index. Indexes are unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, are not affected by cash flows. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

3 The LBMB is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds with a minimum credit rating of at least Baa, which have been issued as part of a deal of at least $50 million, and have an amount outstanding of at least $3 million. The index includes both zero coupon bonds and bonds subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. It is not adjusted to reflect sales charges, expenses, or other fees that the SEC requires to be reflected in the Fund's performance.

4 Total return quoted reflects all applicable sales charges.

Performance data quoted represents past performance which is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Mutual fund performance changes over time and current performance may be lower or higher than what is stated. For current to the most recent month-end performance, visit FederatedInvestors.com or call 1-800-341-7400.

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At August 31, 2005, the Fund's credit-quality ratings composition 1 was as follows:

S&P Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

    Moody's Long-Term Ratings as
Percentage of Total Investments 2

AAA

39.7%
Aaa

53.9%
AA

22.7%
Aa

27.7%
A

2.6%
A

9.1%
BBB

1.2%
Baa

0.0%
Not Rated by S&P

33.8%
Not Rated by Moody's

9.3%
   TOTAL

100.0%
   TOTAL

100.0%

1 These tables depict the long-term, credit-quality ratings assigned to the Fund's portfolio holdings by Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), each of which is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). These credit-quality ratings are shown without regard to gradations within a given rating category. For example, securities rated "A-" have been included in the "A" rated category. Rated securities that have been prerefunded, but not rated again by the NRSRO, have been included in the "Not rated by..." category.

Rated securities include a security with an obligor and/or credit enhancer that has received a rating from an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt obligations that is comparable in priority and security with the security held by the Fund. Credit-quality ratings are an assessment of the risk that a security will default in payment and do not address other risks presented by the security. Please see the descriptions of credit-quality ratings in the Fund's Statement of Additional Information.

Holdings that are rated only by a different NRSRO than the one identified have been included in the "Not rated by..." category. Of the Portfolio's total investments, 7.4% do not have long-term ratings by either of these NRSROs.

2 Percentages are based on total investments, which may differ from the Fund's total net assets used in computing the percentages in the Portfolio of Investments which follows.

Portfolio of Investments

August 31, 2005

Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--98.6%
Guam--1.6%
$ 835,000 Guam Airport Authority, General Revenue Bonds (Series 2003B), 5.25% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 10/1/2015

AAA/Aaa


$
933,346
Puerto Rico--11.2%
2,000,000 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, UT GO Bonds, 5.50% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 7/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 2,177,800
900,000 Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2004PP), 5.00% (FGIC INS), 7/1/2024
AAA/Aaa 974,385
2,000,000 Puerto Rico HFA, Capital Fund Program Revenue Bonds, 5.00%, 12/1/2016
AA/Aa3 2,167,760
1,000,000 Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Inter American University of Puerto Rico)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 10/1/2017

AAA/Aaa



1,102,320
   TOTAL





6,422,265
Vermont--83.6%
565,000 Burlington, VT Airport, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 3.625% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 3.76%), 7/1/2017
NR/Aaa 548,276
1,250,000 Burlington, VT Airport, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 7/1/2023
NR/Aaa 1,355,062
490,000 Burlington, VT Electric Authority, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 4.00% (FSA INS), 7/1/2015
NR/Aaa 500,045
510,000 Burlington, VT Electric Authority, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 4.00% (FSA INS), 7/1/2016
NR/Aaa 518,145
300,000 Burlington, VT Waterworks System, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 4.65% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.70%), 7/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 304,518
150,000 Burlington, VT Waterworks System, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 4.75% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.80%), 7/1/2007
AAA/Aaa 154,900
300,000 Burlington, VT Waterworks System, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 4.80% (FGIC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.85%), 7/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 309,525
495,000 Burlington, VT, Certificates of Participation (Series 2005), 4.25% (Original Issue Yield: 4.32%), 5/1/2020
NR/A2 498,688
515,000 Burlington, VT, Certificates of Participation (Series 2005), 4.25% (Original Issue Yield: 4.37%), 5/1/2021
NR/A2 516,396
800,000 Burlington, VT, (Series A), 5.10%, 12/1/2005
NR/Aa3 804,656
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Vermont--continued
$ 210,000 Burlington, VT, UT GO Bond, (Series A), 4.00% (Original Issue Yield: 4.13%), 11/1/2017
NR/Aa3 $ 213,331
785,000 Burlington, VT, UT GO Bonds, 5.20%, 12/1/2006
NR/Aa3 789,522
185,000 Burlington, VT, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 3.75% (Original Issue Yield: 3.83%), 11/1/2014
NR/Aa3 188,162
190,000 Burlington, VT, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 3.75% (Original Issue Yield: 3.93%), 11/1/2015
NR/Aa3 192,284
200,000 Burlington, VT, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 4.00% (Original Issue Yield: 4.03%), 11/1/2016
NR/Aa3 203,928
220,000 Burlington, VT, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 4.00% (Original Issue Yield: 4.22%), 11/1/2018
NR/Aa3 222,521
155,000 Burlington, VT, UT GO Public Improvement Bonds, (Series A), 3.50%, 11/1/2010
NR/Aa3 157,526
125,000 Burlington, VT, UT GO Public Improvement Bonds, (Series A), 3.60% (Original Issue Yield: 3.72%), 11/1/2013
NR/Aa3 126,455
110,000 Chittenden, VT Solid Waste District, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 2.50% (AMBAC INS), 1/1/2007
AAA/Aaa 109,376
100,000 Chittenden, VT Solid Waste District, UT GO Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 3.30% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 3.32%), 1/1/2010
AAA/Aaa 100,904
310,000 Chittenden, VT Solid Waste District, UT GO Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 3.40% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 3.52%), 1/1/2011
AAA/Aaa 312,933
205,000 Chittenden, VT Solid Waste District, UT GO Refunding Bonds, (Series A), 3.50% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 3.62%), 1/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 207,495
90,000 Fair Haven, VT Union High School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.00% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.05%), 12/1/2005
AAA/Aaa 90,497
90,000 Fair Haven, VT Union High School District, UT GO Bonds, 5.05% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.15%), 12/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 90,481
25,000 Norwich, VT School District, UT GO Bonds, 4.50% (AMBAC INS), 7/15/2009
AAA/Aaa 26,287
500,000 St. Johnsbury, VT School District, UT GO Bonds, 4.50% (AMBAC INS), 9/1/2005
NR/Aaa 500,000
520,000 St. Johnsbury, VT School District, UT GO Bonds, 4.55% (AMBAC INS), 9/1/2006
NR/Aaa 528,819
515,000 St. Johnsbury, VT School District, UT GO Bonds, 4.65% (AMBAC INS), 9/1/2007
NR/Aaa 532,206
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Vermont--continued
$ 520,000 St. Johnsbury, VT School District, UT GO Bonds, 4.80% (AMBAC INS), 9/1/2008
NR/Aaa $ 546,634
340,000 Swanton Village, VT Electric System, Revenue Refunding Bonds, 5.75% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.85%), 12/1/2019
AAA/Aaa 367,135
500,000 University of Vermont & State Agricultural College, Revenue Bonds, 4.20% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.25%), 10/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 526,270
250,000 University of Vermont & State Agricultural College, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (AMBAC INS), 10/1/2021
AAA/Aaa 274,107
1,150,000 University of Vermont & State Agricultural College, Revenue Bonds, 5.25% (AMBAC INS), 10/1/2023
AAA/Aaa 1,260,894
500,000 University of Vermont & State Agricultural College, Revenue Bonds, 5.50% (AMBAC INS), 10/1/2018
AAA/Aaa 561,740
2,500,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.00% (Fletcher Allen Health Care)/(FGIC INS), 12/1/2023
AAA/Aaa 2,708,650
3,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bond, 1.96% TOBs (Middlebury College), Optional Tender 11/1/2005
AA/NR 2,993
1,100,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), 5.00% (Middlebury College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.20%), 11/1/2032
AA/Aa3 1,159,136
225,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 4.25% (Landmark College, Inc.)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.32%), 7/1/2015
AA/Aa3 230,488
50,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 3.25% (St. Michael's College)/(Original Issue Yield: 3.33%), 10/1/2009
A-/A3 49,848
100,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 3.60% (St. Michael's College)/(Original Issue Yield: 3.68%), 10/1/2010
A-/A3 100,855
140,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 3.875% (St. Michael's College)/(Original Issue Yield: 3.93%), 10/1/2011
A-/A3 142,813
195,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 4.00% (St. Michael's College)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.10%), 10/1/2012
A-/A3 199,834
125,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 4.125% (St. Michael's College)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.23%), 10/1/2013
A-/A3 128,635
385,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 4.25% (St. Michael's College)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.35%), 10/1/2014
A-/A3 397,763
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Vermont--continued
$ 370,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 4.375% (St. Michael's College)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.45%), 10/1/2015
A-/A3 $ 381,814
770,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 5.30% (Middlebury College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.45%), 11/1/2008
AA/Aa3 805,158
190,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, 5.375% (Middlebury College)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.93%), 11/1/2026
AA/Aa3 198,210
400,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 4.00% (Middlebury College)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.13%), 11/1/2013
AA/Aa3 415,524
65,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 5.30% (Fletcher Allen Health Care)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.32%), 12/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 69,122
55,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 5.30% (Fletcher Allen Health Care)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.38%), 12/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 59,242
4,380,000 2 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, (Series1999 A), 3.57% (Marlboro College), 4/1/2019
NR 4,149,130
60,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Refunding Bonds, 4.40% (Central Vermont Hospital & Nursing Home)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.55%), 11/15/2005
AAA/Aaa 60,188
605,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series 1996), 4.50% (Central Vermont Hospital & Nursing Home)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.65%), 11/15/2006
AAA/Aaa 615,896
200,000 Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series 1996), 4.625% (Central Vermont Hospital & Nursing Home)/(AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.75%), 11/15/2007
AAA/Aaa 206,554
85,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 11A), 4.70% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(FSA INS), 11/1/2005
AAA/Aaa 85,165
115,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 11A), 4.85% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(FSA INS), 11/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 115,176
80,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 11A), 4.95% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(FSA INS), 11/1/2007
AAA/Aaa 80,150
115,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 11A), 5.05% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(FSA INS), 11/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 115,266
140,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 11A), 5.15% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(FSA INS), 11/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 140,354
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Vermont--continued
$ 90,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 12B), 5.50% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(FSA INS), 11/1/2008
AAA/Aaa $ 90,251
115,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 12B), 5.60% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(FSA INS), 11/1/2009
AAA/Aaa 115,362
55,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 5), 6.875% (Vermont HFA SFM), 11/1/2016
A+/Aa3 55,470
110,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 9), 4.55% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 5/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 113,243
5,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series 9), 5.10% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 5/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 5,046
205,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 4.45% (Vermont HFA MFH)/(HUD Section 8 INS), 2/15/2008
AA-/NR 209,135
130,000 Vermont HFA, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 4.55% (Vermont HFA MFH)/(HUD Section 8 INS), 2/15/2009
AA-/NR 132,903
1,000,000 Vermont HFA, SFH Bonds (Series 22), 4.70% (Vermont HFA SFM)/(FSA INS), 11/1/2035
AAA/Aaa 1,005,200
1,000,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series 1), 4.40% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.45%), 12/1/2007
AAA/Aaa 1,031,920
1,500,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series 1), 4.30% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.40%), 12/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 1,526,610
860,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series 1), 4.60% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.65%), 12/1/2007
NR/Aaa 891,166
100,000 3 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series 1), 4.80% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.95%), 12/1/2008
AAA/Aaa 105,175
1,000,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series 2), 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 12/1/2017
NR/Aaa 1,099,110
1,000,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series 2), 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 12/1/2018
NR/Aaa 1,098,360
250,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series I), 3.80% (Original Issue Yield: 3.86%), 12/1/2011
NR/Aa3 256,855
250,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series I), 3.90% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 3.96%), 12/1/2012
AAA/Aaa 258,288
250,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series I), 4.00% (AMBAC INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.07%), 12/1/2013
AAA/Aaa 257,125
340,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Bonds, (Series A), 4.80% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.85%), 12/1/2009
NR/Aaa 362,528
165,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series 2), 4.30% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.40%), 12/1/2006
AAA/Aaa 167,927
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
MUNICIPAL BONDS--continued
Vermont--continued
$ 665,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series 2), 4.40% (FSA INS)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.45%), 12/1/2007
AAA/Aaa $ 686,227
500,000 Vermont Municipal Bond Bank, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series 2), 5.20% (United States Treasury PRF 12/1/2005 @102)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.30%), 12/1/2007
AAA/Aaa 512,975
840,000 Vermont Public Power Supply Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series E), 5.00% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 7/1/2011
AAA/Aaa 916,801
500,000 Vermont Public Power Supply Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, (Series E), 5.25% (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 7/1/2015
AAA/Aaa 567,120
945,000 Vermont State Student Assistance Corp., Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Original Issue Yield: 5.08%), 3/1/2034
NR/A2 986,901
1,665,000 Vermont State Student Assistance Corp., Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Original Issue Yield: 5.03%), 3/1/2026
NR/A2 1,749,932
500,000 Vermont State, Refunding UT GO Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.00%, 2/1/2015
AA+/Aa1 553,565
500,000 Vermont State, UT GO Bonds (Series 2005B), 5.00%, 3/1/2020
AA+/Aa1 549,775
2,050,000 Vermont State, UT GO Bonds, 4.00%, 3/1/2022
AA+/Aa1 2,052,419
500,000 Vermont State, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 4.40% (Original Issue Yield: 4.45%), 1/15/2007
AA+/Aa1 510,355
250,000 Vermont State, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 4.75% (Original Issue Yield: 4.87%), 8/1/2020
AA+/Aa1 261,730
1,600,000 Vermont State, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 5.00% (United States Treasury PRF 1/15/2006 @102)/(Original Issue Yield: 4.95%), 1/15/2008
AA+/Aa1 1,645,024
1,300,000 Vermont State, UT GO Bonds, (Series A), 5.00% (United States Treasury PRF 1/15/2006 @102)/(Original Issue Yield: 5.10%), 1/15/2010
AA+/Aa1 1,336,582
500,000 Vermont State, UT GO Bonds, (Series C), 4.60% (Original Issue Yield: 4.75%), 1/15/2013

AA+/Aa1



529,355
   TOTAL





47,898,117
Virgin Islands--2.2%
500,000 Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Gross Receipt Tax Revenue Bonds, 5.00% (Virgin Islands Territory)/(FSA INS), 10/1/2014
AAA/Aaa 558,945
510,000 Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.25% (Virgin Islands Matching Fund), 10/1/2017
BBB/NR 558,338
100,000 Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds (Series 2004A), 5.25% (Virgin Islands Matching Fund), 10/1/2024

BBB/NR



107,662
   TOTAL





1,224,945
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (IDENTIFIED COST $55,291,034)





56,478,673
Principal
Amount

   

   
Credit
Rating

1
   

Value
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--0.5%
Puerto Rico--0.5%
$ 300,000 Puerto Rico Government Development Bank (GDB) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Credit Suisse, Zurich LIQ)
(AT AMORTIZED COST)

A-1/VMIG1


$
300,000
   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--99.1%
(IDENTIFIED COST $55,591,034) 4






56,778,673
   TOTAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.9%





493,306
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%



$

57,271,979

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 4.0% of the Fund's portfolio as calculated based upon total portfolio market value. (Percentage is unaudited.)

1 Current credit ratings are unaudited.

2 Denotes a restricted security, including securities purchased under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This security, which has been deemed liquid by criteria approved by the Fund's Board of Trustees (the "Trustees"), unless registered under the Act or exempted from registration, may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. At August 31, 2005, these securities amounted to $4,149,130 which represents 7.2% of total net assets.

3 Pledged as collateral to ensure the Fund is able to satisfy the obligations of its outstanding short futures contracts.

4 At August 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $55,591,034.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at August 31, 2005.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FSA -- Financial Security Assurance
GO --General Obligation
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
HUD --Housing and Urban Development
INS --Insured
LIQ --Liquidity Agreement
MFH --Multi Family Housing
PRF --Prerefunded
SFH --Single Family Housing
SFM --Single Family Mortgage
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
UT --Unlimited Tax
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

August 31, 2005

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at value (identified cost $55,591,034)
$ 56,778,673
Cash
74,456
Income receivable





675,110

   TOTAL ASSETS





57,528,239

Liabilities:
Payable for shares redeemed
$ 38,281
Income distribution payable
162,488
Payable for daily variation margin
17,500
Payable for share registration fee
2,216
Payable for transfer and dividend and disbursing agent fees and expenses
8,783
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fee
1,135
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
12,237
Payable for legal fees
2,601
Payable for registration and filing fees
2,541
Accrued expenses


8,478




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





256,260

Net assets for 5,720,990 shares outstanding




$
57,271,979

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 56,190,323
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and futures contracts
1,153,046
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and futures contracts
(70,965 )
Accumulated net investment income (loss)





(425
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
57,271,979

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
Net asset value per share ($57,271,979 ÷ 5,720,990 shares outstanding), no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$10.01

Offering price per share (100/95.50 of $10.01) 1





$10.48

Redemption proceeds per share





$10.01

1 See "What Do Shares Cost?" in the Prospectus.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended August 31, 2005

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
2,614,093

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 257,354
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
150,000
Custodian fees
5,206
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
23,513
Directors'/Trustees' fees
2,332
Auditing fees
16,588
Legal fees
7,658
Portfolio accounting fees
40,734
Distribution services fee (Note 5)
160,846
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
160,846
Share registration costs
37,332
Printing and postage
19,892
Insurance premiums
8,376
Miscellaneous






1,055





   TOTAL EXPENSES






891,732





Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (188,670 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(24,355 )
Waiver of distribution services fee


(160,846
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS






(373,871
)




Net expenses










517,861

Net investment income










2,096,232

Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments:
Net realized gain on investments
210,835
Net realized loss on futures contracts
(148,684 )
Net change in unrealized appreciation of investments
(715,271 )
Net change in unrealized depreciation of futures contracts










(34,593
)
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments and futures contracts










(687,713
)
Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
1,408,519

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended August 31
   

2005

   

2004

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 2,096,232 $ 2,407,441
Net realized gain on investments and futures contracts
62,151 242,028
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments and futures contracts


(749,864
)


229,527

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


1,408,519



2,878,996

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
(2,094,424 ) (2,415,172 )
Distributions from net realized gains


(236,002
)


(93,477
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(2,330,426
)


(2,508,649
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
6,244,153 5,732,692
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
15,806 943
Cost of shares redeemed


(19,081,401
)


(15,585,894
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(12,821,442
)


(9,852,259
)
Change in net assets


(13,743,349
)


(9,481,912
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


71,015,328



80,497,240

End of period (including accumulated net investment income (loss) of $(425) and $(1,797), respectively)

$
57,271,979


$
71,015,328

Notes to Financial Statements

August 31, 2005

1. ORGANIZATION

Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of seven portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated Vermont Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a non-diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The Fund offers one class of shares. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income which is exempt from federal regular income tax and the personal income taxes imposed by the State of Vermont and Vermont municipalities. Interest income from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

Municipal bonds are valued by an independent pricing service, taking into consideration yield, liquidity, risk, credit quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, and any other factors or market data the pricing service deems relevant. The Fund generally values short-term securities according to prices furnished by an independent pricing service, except that short-term securities with remaining maturities of less than 60 days at the time of purchase may be valued at amortized cost. Prices furnished by an independent pricing service are intended to be indicative of the mean between the bid and asked prices currently offered to institutional investors for the securities. Securities for which no quotations are readily available are valued at fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Board of Trustees (the "Trustees").

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Dividend income and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Futures Contracts

The Fund periodically may sell bond interest rate futures contracts to manage duration and to potentially reduce transaction costs. Upon entering into a bond interest rate futures contract with a broker, the Fund is required to deposit in a segregated account a specified amount of cash or U.S. government securities. Futures contracts are valued daily and unrealized gains or losses are recorded in a "variation margin" account. Daily, the Fund receives from or pays to the broker a specified amount of cash based upon changes in the variation margin account. When a contract is closed, the Fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. Futures contracts have market risks, including the risk that the change in the value of the contract may not correlate with the changes in the value of the underlying securities. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund had realized losses on futures contracts of $148,684.

At August 31, 2005, the Fund had the following open futures contracts:

Expiration Date
   
Contracts to Receive
   
Position
   
Unrealized
Depreciation

December 2005

35 U.S. Treasury Notes 10 Yr Futures

Short

$(34,593)

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from such registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. The Fund's restricted securities are valued at the price provided by dealers in the secondary market or, if no market prices are available, at the fair value as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under general supervision of the Trustees.

Additional information on restricted securities, excluding securities purchased under Rule 144A that have been deemed liquid by the Trustees, held at August 31, 2005, is as follows:

Security
   
Acquisition
Date

   
Acquisition
Cost

Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, (Series 1999 A), 3.57% (Marlboro College), 4/1/2019

3/22/1999

$4,395,087

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended August 31
   
2005

   
2004

Shares sold

622,715


561,431

Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

1,577


93

Shares redeemed

(1,902,765
)

(1,529,255
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(1,278,473
)

(967,731
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The timing and character of income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These differences are due to income and gain distribution reclasses.

For the year ended August 31, 2005, permanent differences identified and reclassified among the components of net assets were as follows:

Increase (Decrease)
Accumulated
Net Investment
Income (Loss)

   
Accumulated
Net Realized
Gains (Losses)

$(436)

$436

Net investment income, net realized gains (losses), and net assets were not affected by this reclassification.

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended August 31, 2005 and 2004 was as follows:


   
   
2005
   
   
2004
Tax-exempt income

$
2,089,340

$
2,413,600
Ordinary income 1

$
5,084

$
1,572
Long-term capital gains

$
236,002

$
93,477

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of August 31, 2005, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income
   
$
162,059
Undistributed long-term capital gain

$
5
Unrealized appreciation

$
1,187,639

At August 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal tax purposes was $55,591,034. The net unrealized appreciation of investments for federal tax purposes was $1,187,639 excluding unrealized depreciation from futures of $34,593. This consists of net unrealized appreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of value over cost of $1,429,160 and net unrealized depreciation from investments for those securities having an excess of cost over value of $241,521.

Under current tax regulations, capital losses realized after October 31 may be deferred and treated as occurring on the first day of the following fiscal year. As of August 31, 2005, for federal income tax purposes, post October losses of $105,558 were deferred to September 1, 2005.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the Adviser voluntarily waived $188,670 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of all Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended August 31, 2005, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.195% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses of up to 0.25% of average daily net assets, annually, to compensate FSC. Pursuant to a written waiver agreement, FSC will waive its fee. This contractual waiver will expire on August 27, 2006. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC waived $160,846 of its fee. Rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay fees to FSC and FSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Services Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), a subsidiary of Federated Investors, Inc., for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. Under certain agreements, rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay Service Fees to FSSC and FSSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. This voluntary waiver can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended August 31, 2005, FSSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended August 31, 2005, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $22,400,000 and $22,800,000, respectively.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding long-term U.S. government securities and short-term obligations for the year ended August 31, 2005, were as follows:

Purchases
   
$
20,933,052
Sales

$
33,523,425

7. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Since the Fund invests a substantial portion of its assets in issuers located in one state, it will be more susceptible to factors adversely affecting issuers of that state than would be a comparable tax-exempt mutual fund that invests nationally. In order to reduce the credit risk associated with such factors, at August 31, 2005, 54.4% of the securities in the portfolio of investments is backed by letters of credit or bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The largest percentage of investments insured by or supported (backed) by a letter of credit from any one institution or agency was 21.0% of total investments.

8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and will respond appropriately. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse
consequences for the Funds.

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

For the year ended August 31, 2005, the amount of long-term capital gain designated by the Fund was $236,002.

At August 31, 2005, 99.8% of the distributions from net investment income is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FEDERATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES INCOME TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED VERMONT MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Federated Vermont Municipal Income Fund (the "Fund"), a portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust as of August 31, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 2005, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of August 31, 2005 and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche Llp

Boston, Massachusetts
October 18, 2005

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e, "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e, "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2004, the Trust comprised seven portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 44 investment companies (comprising 133 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Chairman and Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd.; Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1998
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc. (marketing communications and technology) (prior to 9/1/00).

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue and Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: July 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Began Serving

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: August 1990
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Began Serving

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Richard J. Thomas
Birth Date: June 17, 1954
TREASURER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; held various management positions within Funds Financial Services Division of Federated Investors, Inc.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE CHAIRMAN
Began serving: August 2002
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



J. Scott Albrecht
Birth Date: June 1, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: November 1998
J. Scott Albrecht is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Albrecht joined Federated in 1989. He has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1997 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. He was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Albrecht is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Public Management from Carnegie Mellon University.



Board Review of Advisory Contract

As required by the Act, the Fund's Board has reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considers many factors, among the most material of which are: the Fund's investment objectives; the Adviser's management philosophy, personnel, processes, and investment and operating strategies; long-term performance; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the range and quality of services provided to the Fund and its shareholders by the Federated organization in addition to investment advisory services; and the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds.

In its decision to appoint or renew the Adviser, the Board is mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognizes that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's "selection" or approval of the Adviser must reflect the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund. The Board also considers the compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This includes fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. In this regard, the Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Adviser's service and fee. The Fund's Board is aware of these factors and is guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considers and weighs these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. In this regard, the Board requests and receives substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization. Federated provides much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnishes additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board's evaluation of an advisory contract is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, personnel, and processes; operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities; the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The evaluation process is evolutionary, reflecting continually developing considerations. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focuses on comparisons with other similar mutual funds (rather than non-mutual fund products or services) because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle already chosen by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group may be a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing on the Fund's investment program, which would in turn assist the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services are such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract.

The Board also receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses. Although the Board considers the profitability of the Federated organization as a whole, it does not evaluate, on a fund-by-fund basis, Federated's "profitability" and/or "costs" (which would include an assessment as to whether "economies of scale" would be realized if the fund were to grow to some sufficient size). In the Board's view, the cost of performing advisory services on a fund-specific basis is both difficult to estimate satisfactorily and a relatively minor consideration in its overall evaluation. Analyzing isolated funds would require constructed allocations of the costs of shared resources and operations based on artificial assumptions that are inconsistent with the existing relationships within a large and diversified family of funds that receive advisory and other services from the same organization. Although the Board is always eager to discover any genuine "economies of scale," its experience has been that such "economies" are likely to arise only when a fund grows dramatically, and becomes and remains very large in size. Even in these instances, purchase and redemption activity, as well as the presence of expense limitations (if any), may offset any perceived economies. As suggested above, the Board considers the information it receives about the Fund's performance and expenses as compared to an appropriate set of similar competing funds to be more relevant.

The Board bases its decision to approve an advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above are relevant to every Federated fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provide a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Vermont Municipal Income Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 313923872

31280 (10/05)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2005 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.


Item 2.     Code of Ethics

(a) As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has
adopted a code of ethics (the "Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies
- Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers") that
applies to the registrant's Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer; the registrant's Principal Financial Officer also serves
as the Principal Accounting Officer.

(c) Not Applicable

(d) Not Applicable

(e) Not Applicable

(f)(3) The registrant hereby undertakes to provide any person, without
charge, upon request, a copy of the code of ethics.  To request a copy of the
code of ethics, contact the registrant at 1-800-341-7400, and ask for a copy
of the Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies - Ethical Standards for
Principal Executive and Financial Officers.


Item 3.     Audit Committee Financial Expert

The registrant's Board has determined that each member of the Board's Audit
Committee is an "audit committee financial expert," and that each such member
is "independent," for purposes of this Item.  The Audit Committee consists of
the following Board members:  Thomas G. Bigley, John T. Conroy, Jr., Nicholas
P. Constantakis and Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.


Item 4.     Principal Accountant Fees and Services

(a)         Audit Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent
fiscal years:

                  Fiscal year ended 2005 - $154,707

                  Fiscal year ended 2004 - $132,393

(b)         Audit-Related Fees billed to the registrant for the two most
recent fiscal years:

                  Fiscal year ended 2005 - $0

                  Fiscal year ended 2004 - $586

                  Transfer Agent Service Auditors Report

      Amount requiring approval of the registrant's audit committee pursuant
      to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $35,160 and
      $61,414 respectively.  Fiscal year ended 2005 - Transfer Agent Service
      Auditors report and fees for review of N-14 merger documents. Fiscal
      year ended 2004 - Attestation services relating to the review of fund
      share transaction and Transfer Agent Service Auditors report.

(c)          Tax Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal
years:

                  Fiscal year ended 2005 - $0

                  Fiscal year ended 2004 - $0

      Amount requiring approval of the registrant's audit committee pursuant
      to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and $65,000
      respectively.

      Analysis regarding the realignment of advisory companies.

(d)         All Other Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent
fiscal years:

                  Fiscal year ended 2005 - $0

                  Fiscal year ended 2004 - $0

      Amount requiring approval of the registrant's audit committee pursuant
      to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $22,187 and
      $125,143 respectively.  Fiscal year ended 2005 - Discussions with
      auditor related to market timing and late trading activities and
      executive compensation analysis.  Fiscal year ended 2004 - Consultation
      regarding information requests by regulatory agencies and executive
      compensation analysis.



(e)(1)      Audit Committee Policies regarding Pre-approval of Services.

            The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve audit and
non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure
that the provision of such services do not impair the auditor's
independence.  Unless a type of service to be provided by the independent
auditor has received general pre-approval, it will require specific
pre-approval by the Audit Committee.  Any proposed services exceeding
pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit
Committee.

            Certain services have the general pre-approval of the Audit
Committee.  The term of the general pre-approval is 12 months from the date
of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a
different period.  The Audit Committee will annually review the services that
may be provided by the independent auditor without obtaining specific
pre-approval from the Audit Committee and may grant general pre-approval for
such services.  The Audit Committee will revise the list of general
pre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations.
The Audit Committee will not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve
services performed by the independent auditor to management.

            The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its
Chairman.  The Chairman will report any pre-approval decisions to the Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting.  The Committee will designate
another member with such pre-approval authority when the Chairman is
unavailable.

AUDIT SERVICES

      The annual Audit services engagement terms and fees will be subject to
the specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee must
approve any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in
audit scope, registered investment company (RIC) structure or other matters.

      In addition to the annual Audit services engagement specifically
approved by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee may grant general
pre-approval for other Audit Services, which are those services that only the
independent auditor reasonably can provide.  The Audit Committee has
pre-approved certain Audit services, all other Audit services must be
specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

AUDIT-RELATED SERVICES

      Audit-related services are assurance and related services that are
reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's
financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the independent
auditor.  The Audit Committee believes that the provision of Audit-related
services does not impair the independence of the auditor, and has
pre-approved certain Audit-related services, all other Audit-related services
must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

TAX SERVICES

      The Audit Committee believes that the independent auditor can provide
Tax services to the Company such as tax compliance, tax planning and tax
advice without impairing the auditor's independence.  However, the Audit
Committee will not permit the retention of the independent auditor in
connection with a transaction initially recommended by the independent
auditor, the purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of
which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related
regulations.  The Audit Committee has pre-approved certain Tax services, all
Tax services involving large and complex transactions must be specifically
pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

ALL OTHER SERVICES

      With respect to the provision of services other than audit, review or
attest services the pre-approval requirement is waived if:



(1)   The aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more
                  than five percent of the total amount of revenues paid by
                  the registrant, the registrant's adviser (not including any
                  sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management
                  and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment
                  adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or
                  under common control with the investment adviser that
                  provides ongoing services to the registrant to its
                  accountant during the fiscal year in which the services are
                  provided;
(2)   Such services were not recognized by the registrant, the registrant's
                  adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is
                  primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or
                  overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity
                  controlling, controlled by, or under common control with
                  the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to
                  the registrant  at the time of the engagement to be
                  non-audit services; and
(3)   Such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Audit
                  Committee of the issuer and approved prior to the
                  completion of the audit by the Audit Committee or by one or
                  more members of the Audit Committee who are members of the
                  board of directors to whom authority to grant such
                  approvals has been delegated by the Audit Committee.


      The Audit Committee may grant general pre-approval to those permissible
non-audit services classified as All Other services that it believes are
routine and recurring services, and would not impair the independence of the
auditor.

      The SEC's rules and relevant guidance should be consulted to determine
the precise definitions of prohibited non-audit services and the
applicability of exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.

PRE-APPROVAL FEE LEVELS

      Pre-approval fee levels for all services to be provided by the
independent auditor will be established annually by the Audit Committee.  Any
proposed services exceeding these levels will require specific pre-approval
by the Audit Committee.

PROCEDURES

      Requests or applications to provide services that require specific
approval by the Audit Committee will be submitted to the Audit Committee by
both the independent auditor and the Principal Accounting Officer and/or
Internal Auditor, and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their
view, the request or application is consistent with the SEC's rules on
auditor independence.

(e)(2)      Percentage of services identified in items 4(b) through 4(d) that
were approved by the registrants audit committee pursuant to paragraph
(c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X:

            4(b)

            Fiscal year ended 2005 - 0%

            Fiscal year ended 2004 - 0%

            Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment
            adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
            common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing
            services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants
            audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01
            of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

            4(c)

            Fiscal year ended 2005 - 0%

            Fiscal year ended 2004 - 0%

            Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment
            adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
            common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing
            services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants
            audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01
            of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

            4(d)

            Fiscal year ended 2005 - 0%

            Fiscal year ended 2004 - 0%

            Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment
            adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
            common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing
            services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants
            audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01
            of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

(f)   NA


(g)   Non-Audit Fees billed to the registrant, the registrant's investment
      adviser, and certain entities controlling, controlled by or under
      common control with the investment adviser:
            Fiscal year ended 2005 - $108,945

            Fiscal year ended 2004 - $310,672

(h)         The registrant's Audit Committee has considered that the
provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant's
adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio
management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment
adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control
with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant
that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of
Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's
independence.


Item 5.     Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

            Not Applicable

Item 6.     Schedule of Investments

            Not Applicable

Item 7.     Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End
            Management Investment Companies

            Not Applicable

Item 8.     Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

            Not Applicable

Item 9.     Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management
            Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

            Not Applicable

Item 10.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

            Not Applicable

Item 11.    Controls and Procedures

(a) The registrant's President and Treasurer have concluded that the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c)
under the Act) are effective in design and operation and are sufficient to
form the basis of the certifications required by Rule 30a-(2) under the Act,
based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures within
90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) during the last fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12.    Exhibits













SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant  Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust

By          /S/ Richard J. Thomas
                Richard J. Thomas, Principal Financial Officer
                            (insert name and title)

Date        October 21, 2005


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.


By          /S/ J. Christopher Donahue
                J. Christopher Donahue, Principal Executive Officer


Date        October 21, 2005


By          /S/ Richard J. Thomas
                Richard J. Thomas, Principal Financial Officer


Date        October 21, 2005