XML 30 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Goodwill and Intangible Assets [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets:
Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment annually and if an event or conditions change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. The Company completes its annual impairment test as of December 31 of each year.
The Company has identified six reporting units that are either operating segments or one level below operating segments. As an overall reasonableness test in its step one analysis the Company reconciled the sum of the estimated fair values of its reporting units to the Company's market value (based on its stock price at the measurement date), plus a reasonable control premium, which is estimated as that amount which would be received to sell a majority share of the Company in an orderly transaction between market participants versus the market value of the minority shares as evidenced by the stock price.
When testing for goodwill impairment, the Company performs a first step of the goodwill impairment test to identify a potential impairment. In doing so, the Company compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill may be impaired and a second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of any impairment loss. Estimates about fair value used in the first step of the goodwill impairment tests have been calculated using an average of the income approach based on the present value of future cash flows of each reporting unit and the guideline public company model. Under the income approach, the Company determined fair value based on estimated future cash flows of each reporting unit, discounted by an estimated weighted-average cost of capital, which reflects the overall level of inherent risk of a reporting unit and the rate of return an outside investor would expect to earn. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions among others. Changes in economic and operating conditions impacting these assumptions could result in goodwill impairments in future periods.
In the second step of the goodwill impairment test, the Company compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner that the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. The Company allocates the fair value of a reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, including intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Any excess of the value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill.
At December 31, 2011 the Company has $34,474 of goodwill related to its propel and electronic components reporting units which was tested for impairment, as required annually. The fair value of the propel and electronic components reporting units substantially exceeded the carrying value, resulting in no impairment.
The Company considered the decrease in its market value in the first quarter of 2009 to be a triggering event that required goodwill to be tested for impairment at March 31, 2009. As a result of that testing the Company determined that the implied fair value of goodwill for the valves reporting unit was less than its carrying value by $50,841, which was recorded as a goodwill impairment charge.
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 are as follows:
 
Propel
Segment
 
Controls
Segment
 
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2010
$
27,091

 
$
8,812

 
$
35,903

Translation Adjustment
(625
)
 
(223
)
 
(848
)
Balance as of December 31, 2010
26,466

 
8,589

 
35,055

Translation Adjustment
(432
)
 
(149
)
 
(581
)
Balance as of December 31, 2011
$
26,034

 
$
8,440

 
$
34,474


The following table summarizes the components of the other intangible asset balances at December 31, 2011 and 2010:
 
Trade Name
 
Technology
 
Customer
Relationships
 
Other
 
Total
December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost
$
19,000

 
$
10,700

 
$
1,267

 
$
2,008

 
$
32,975

Accumulated amortization
(5,972
)
 
(7,846
)
 
(644
)
 
(1,630
)
 
(16,092
)
Other intangible assets, net
$
13,028

 
$
2,854

 
$
623

 
$
378

 
$
16,883

December 31, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost
$
19,000

 
$
10,700

 
$
1,313

 
$
1,967

 
$
32,980

Accumulated amortization
(5,429
)
 
(7,132
)
 
(493
)
 
(1,510
)
 
(14,564
)
Other intangible assets, net
$
13,571

 
$
3,568

 
$
820

 
$
457

 
$
18,416

The weighted average useful lives for the intangible assets are 35, 15, 15, and 4 years for trade name, technology, customer relationships, and other, respectively. Amortization of intangible assets was $1,708, $1,832, and $1,878 in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense is expected to be approximately $1,600 in 2012, $1,500 in 2013, $1,300 in 2014, $1,300 in 2015, and $600 in 2016.