XML 88 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities and are summarized into three broad categories:

 

    Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities;

 

    Level 2 – other significant observable inputs, including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, credit risk, etc.; and

 

    Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs, including our own assumptions in determining fair value.

The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

The disclosures related to our financial assets and (liabilities) that are reported at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (in thousands):

 

     December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  
     Fair Value      Input Level      Fair Value     Input Level  

Marketable securities – corporate equities

   $ 6         Level 1       $ 1        Level 1   

Marketable securities – corporate obligations

   $ 1,620         Level 2       $ 4,277        Level 2   

Forward sale contracts for Japanese yen

   $ 2,510         Level 2       $ 523        Level 2   

Forward purchase contract for euro

   $ 726         Level 2       $ 2,061        Level 2   

Forward sale contract for euro

   $ 22,056         Level 2       $ 24,561        Level 2   

Contingent consideration related to the RTP Acquisition

   $ —           Level 3       $ (1,350     Level 3   

 

The fair value of our marketable securities is determined based on quoted market prices for similar or identical securities. The fair value of our forward contracts is based on quoted market prices for similar securities and is used for the purpose of determining any gain or loss on our foreign currency positions. We do not record the full value of the forward contracts in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We record the net unrealized gain or loss in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and as a component of Other income (expense).

The fair value of the contingent consideration related to the RTP Acquisition was determined based on the present value of probability weighted payments expected to be made under the terms of the agreement.

The carrying values of Cash and cash equivalents, Restricted cash, Accounts receivable, Prepaid expenses and other, Accounts payable and Accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

No changes were made to our valuation techniques during 2014.

The following table summarizes our Level 3 activity for our contingent consideration liability (in thousands):

 

     Level 3  

Balance at December 31, 2013

   $ 1,350   

Decrease in contingent consideration due to re-measurement

     (522

Payment of contingent consideration

     (828
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

$ —