XML 24 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Derivative Liability
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Liability

Note 9. Derivative Liability 

 

For stock based derivative financial instruments, the Company estimated the total enterprise value based upon a combination of the trending of the firm value from December 2006 to December 2016, market comparables, and the market value of the Company’s stock, considering company specific factors including the changes in forward estimated revenues and market factors.  Once the enterprise value was determined an option pricing model was used to allocate the enterprise value to the individual derivative and other securities in the Company’s capital structure. A Black Scholes model was used to test for reasonableness and results were adjusted as appropriate. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date. 

 

The Company’s derivative liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

 

· The debt conversion feature embedded in the various Convertible Promissory Notes which contain anti-dilution provisions that would be triggered if the Company issued instruments with rights to the Company’s common stock at prices below this exercise price (described in Note 2.)
· Derivative liabilities related to outstanding warrants and options due to the Company having insufficient authorized shares to satisfy the exercise or conversion of all outstanding instruments as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

  

The fair value of the derivative liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

 

    2016     2015  
Derivative Instrument                
Notes conversion feature liability   $ 2,077,850     $    
Warrant liability     88,041          
Total   $ 2,165,891     $    

  

Fair Value Valuation Hierarchy Measurement

 

FASB ASC 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows.

 

  Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
  Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.

  

A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The derivative liabilities are measured at fair value using certain estimated factors such as volatility and probability and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The following table provides a roll forward of the liabilities carried at fair value measured using significant unobservable inputs (level 3).