N-CSR 1 form-101.htm ANNUAL REPORT form-101
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR 
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT 
INVESTMENT COMPANIES 
Investment Company Act file number 811-6014 

DREYFUS CONNECTICUT MUNICIPAL MONEY MARKET FUND, INC. 
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)

c/o The Dreyfus Corporation 
200 Park Avenue 
New York, New York 10166 
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) 
 
Mark N. Jacobs, Esq. 
200 Park Avenue 
New York, New York 10166 
(Name and address of agent for service) 
 
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 922-6000 

Date of fiscal year end:    11/30 
Date of reporting period:    11/30/06 


FORM N-CSR

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

  Dreyfus
Connecticut
Municipal Money
Market Fund, Inc.

ANNUAL REPORT November 30, 2006


Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.

The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.

Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value


Contents
 
    THE FUND 


2    A Letter from the CEO 
3    Discussion of Fund Performance 
6    Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses 
6    Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses 
With Those of Other Funds
7    Statement of Investments 
14    Statement of Assets and Liabilities 
15    Statement of Operations 
16    Statement of Changes in Net Assets 
17    Financial Highlights 
18    Notes to Financial Statements 
23    Report of Independent Registered 
    Public Accounting Firm 
24    Important Tax Information 
24    Proxy Results 
25    Board Members Information 
28    Officers of the Fund 
 
FOR MORE INFORMATION

    Back Cover 


Dreyfus Connecticut 
Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc. 

The Fund

  A LETTER FROM THE CEO
  Dear Shareholder:

We are pleased to present this annual report for Dreyfus Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc., covering the 12-month period from December 1, 2005, through November 30, 2006.

Although reports of declining housing prices have raised some economic concerns, we believe that neither a domestic recession nor a major shortfall in global growth is likely. A stubbornly low unemployment rate suggests that labor market conditions remain strong, and stimulative monetary policies over the last several years have left a legacy of ample financial liquidity worldwide. These and other factors should continue to support further economic expansion, but at a slower rate than we saw earlier this year.

The U.S. bond market also appears to be expecting a slower economy, as evidenced by an “inverted yield curve” at the end of November, in which yields of two-year U.S.Treasury securities were lower than the overnight federal funds rate. This anomaly may indicate that short-term interest rates have peaked, while the Federal Reserve Board remains “on hold” as it assesses new releases of economic data. As always, we encourage you to discuss the implications of these and other matters with your financial advisor.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support.

  Thomas F. Eggers
Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
December 15, 2006
2

DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

Bill Vasiliou, Portfolio Manager

How did Dreyfus Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund perform during the period?

For the 12-month period ended November 30, 2006, the fund produced a yield of 2.70% .Taking into account the effects of compounding, the fund also produced an effective yield of 2.73% .1

Tax-exempt money market yields rose over much of the reporting period along with short-term interest rates, then stabilized in the summer and fall of 2006 when the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) refrained from raising rates further.

What is the fund’s investment approach?

The fund seeks as high a level of current income exempt from federal and Connecticut state income taxes as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity.

To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests substantially all of its assets in short-term, high-quality municipal obligations that provide income exempt from federal and Connecticut state personal income taxes.The fund also may invest in high-quality short-term structured notes, which are derivative instruments whose value is tied to underlying municipal obligations.

In managing the fund, we normally employ two primary strategies. First, we attempt to add value by constructing a portfolio of high-quality municipal money market instruments that provide income exempt from federal and Connecticut state personal income taxes. Second, we actively manage the fund’s weighted average maturity based on our anticipation of interest-rate trends and supply-and-demand changes in Connecticut’s short-term municipal marketplace while anticipating the liquidity needs of the fund.

For example, if we expect an increase in short-term supply, we may reduce the fund’s weighted average maturity, which should better posi-

The Fund 3


DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)

tion the fund to purchase new securities with higher yields, if higher yields materialize.Yields tend to rise when there is an increase in new-issue supply competing for investor interest. New securities, which are generally issued with maturities in the one-year range, may lengthen the fund’s weighted average maturity if purchased. If we anticipate limited new-issue supply, we may extend the fund’s weighted average maturity to maintain prevailing yields for as long as we deem appropriate.At other times, we typically try to maintain a weighted average maturity that reflects our view of short-term interest-rate trends, liquidity needs and future supply-and-demand considerations.

What other factors influenced the fund’s performance?

As it had since June 2004, the Fed continued to raise short-term interest rates at the start of the reporting period in its attempts to forestall inflationary pressures in a growing U.S. economy. Despite the Fed’s rate hikes, the economy continued to gain momentum, as GDP growth climbed to a 5.6% annualized rate in the first quarter of 2006.

Resurgent energy prices and hawkish comments from Fed members in the spring prompted investors to revise upward their expectations for inflation and interest rates.The Fed continued to raise interest rates, and by the end of June the federal funds rate stood at 5.25%, its highest level in more than four years.

Investors’ inflation concerns proved to be relatively short-lived, however. Evidence of a slowdown in housing markets began to emerge over the summer, and oil and gas prices also began to moderate, helping to alleviate inflation fears.The Fed apparently agreed with a more benign inflation outlook, as it refrained from raising interest rates in August, September and October. It was later announced that U.S. economic growth cooled to a 2.2% annualized rate during the third quarter.

As investors’ inflation concerns eased, yields of longer-term municipal securities declined while those of shorter-dated instruments remained stable. By the fall, there was little difference in the yields of securities with maturities ranging from six months to four years. Investors therefore continued to focus on tax-exempt instruments maturing in six months or less.

4

In addition, the tax-exempt money markets were influenced by technical factors. Like many other states, Connecticut’s sturdy tax revenues, enabled the state to increase its budget reserves and therefore reduce its borrowing activity. A less robust supply of newly issued municipal money market instruments was met with strong investor demand, putting downward pressure on yields.

Due to narrow yield differences among longer-dated money-market eligible instruments, it made little sense to us to lock in the relatively low yields provided by one-year municipal notes. However, yields of very short-term variable-rate demand notes also were relatively unattractive. Instead, we found opportunities in tax-exempt commercial paper, municipal notes and seasoned municipal bonds with maturities in the three- to nine-month range.Whenever possible, we attempted to stagger the maturities of the fund’s holdings in this range to protect it from potential market volatility.

What is the fund’s current strategy?

Recent Fed comments and evidence of slower economic growth suggest to us that the Fed is unlikely either to raise or lower short-term interest rates over the foreseeable future.While we have maintained the fund’s weighted average maturity in a position that is slightly longer than industry averages, we may lengthen it further to take advantage of seasonal opportunities for higher yields that typically arise near year-end. Of course, we are prepared to adjust our strategies as market conditions continue to evolve.

December 15, 2006
    An investment in the fund is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government 
    agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is 
    possible to lose money by investing in the fund. 
1    Effective yield is based upon dividends declared daily and reinvested monthly. Past performance is 
    no guarantee of future results.Yields fluctuate. Income may be subject to state and local taxes for 
    non-Connecticut residents, and some income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum 
    tax (AMT) for certain investors.Yields provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by 
    The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect that may be extended, terminated 
    or modified at any time. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund would have produced a 
    yield of 2.67% and an effective yield of 2.71%. 

The Fund 5


UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)

As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.

Review your fund’s expenses

The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc. from June 1, 2006 to November 30, 2006. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming actual returns for the six months ended November 30, 2006

Expenses paid per $1,000     $ 3.28 
Ending value (after expenses)    $1,014.60 

COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)

Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended November 30, 2006

Expenses paid per $1,000     $ 3.29 
Ending value (after expenses)    $1,021.81 

Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .65%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

6

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
November 30, 2006
Short-Term    Coupon    Maturity    Principal     
Investments—100.4%    Rate (%)    Date    Amount ($)    Value ($) 





Connecticut—94.4%                 
Beacon Falls,                 
BAN    4.00    7/26/07    1,000,000    1,003,108 
Bethel,                 
GO Notes, BAN    4.50    7/31/07    2,223,000    2,233,818 
Clinton,                 
GO Notes (Insured; AMBAC)    5.50    1/15/07    200,000    200,453 
Connecticut,                 
GO Notes    3.88    12/15/06    100,000    100,008 
Connecticut,                 
GO Notes    4.25    12/15/06    250,000    250,059 
Connecticut,                 
GO Notes    4.38    12/15/06    200,000    200,053 
Connecticut,                 
GO Notes    5.25    12/15/06    280,000    280,156 
Connecticut,                 
GO Notes    6.00    3/1/07    1,385,000    1,393,378 
Connecticut,                 
GO Notes    5.30    3/15/07    125,000    125,613 
Connecticut,                 
GO Notes, Refunding    4.25    6/15/07    395,000    396,450 
Connecticut,                 
GO Notes (Putters Program)                 
(Insured; FGIC and Liquidity                 
Facility; PB Capital Finance Inc.)    3.53    12/7/06    14,690,000 a,b    14,690,000 
Connecticut,                 
Second Lien Special Tax Obligation             
(Transportation Infrastructure                 
Purposes) (Insured; FSA and                 
Liquidity Facility; Bank of America)    3.47    12/7/06    2,500,000 a    2,500,000 
Connecticut,                 
Special Obligation Rate                 
Reduction Revenue    5.00    12/30/06    200,000    200,216 
Connecticut Development Authority,                 
Airport Hotel Revenue,                 
Refunding (Bradley Airport                 
Hotel Project) (LOC; TD                 
Banknorth, N.A.)    3.51    12/7/06    3,350,000 a    3,350,000 
Connecticut Development Authority,                 
IDR (Energy Network Sina                 
Project) (LOC; Bank of America)    3.51    12/7/06    4,300,000 a    4,300,000 

The Fund 7


STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
Short-Term    Coupon    Maturity    Principal         
Investments (continued)    Rate (%)    Date    Amount ($)    Value ($) 





Connecticut (continued)                     
Connecticut Development Authority,                     
IDR (Imperial Electric                     
Assembly Project)                     
(LOC; Wachovia Bank)    3.61    12/7/06    1,420,000    a    1,420,000 
Connecticut Development Authority,                     
IDR (Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp.                     
Project) (LOC; Bank of Montreal)    3.63    12/7/06    4,995,000    a    4,995,000 
Connecticut Development Authority,                     
IDR, Refunding (Capitol                     
District Energy Project)                     
(LOC; Bank of Nova Scotia)    3.51    12/7/06    10,500,000    a    10,500,000 
Connecticut Development Authority,                     
Solid Waste Disposal Facility                     
Revenue (Rand-Whitney                     
Containerboard Limited                     
Partnership Project)                     
(LOC; Bank of Montreal)    3.51    12/7/06    7,945,000    a    7,945,000 
Connecticut Health and Educational                     
Facilities Authority, Revenue                     
(Central Connecticut Coast                     
YMCA Issue) (LOC; Citizens                     
Bank of Rhode Island)    3.49    12/7/06    4,115,000    a    4,115,000 
Connecticut Health and Educational                     
Facilities Authority, Revenue                     
(Eagle Hill School Issue)                     
(LOC; The Bank of New York)    3.48    12/7/06    5,880,000    a    5,880,000 
Connecticut Health and Educational                     
Facilities Authority, Revenue                     
(Greenwich Family YMCA Issue)                     
(LOC; The Bank of New York)    3.48    12/7/06    5,000,000    a    5,000,000 
Connecticut Health and Educational                     
Facilities Authority, Revenue                     
(Quinnipiac University Issue)                     
(Insured; Radian and Liquidity                     
Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank)    3.65    12/1/06    2,000,000    a    2,000,000 
Connecticut Health and Educational                     
Facilities Authority, Revenue                     
(Sacred Heart University                     
Issue) (LOC; Bank of America)    3.46    12/7/06    5,785,000    a    5,785,000 

8

Short-Term    Coupon    Maturity    Principal     
Investments (continued)    Rate (%)    Date    Amount ($)    Value ($) 





Connecticut (continued)                 
Connecticut Health and Educational             
Facilities Authority, Revenue                 
(Taft School Issue)                 
(LOC; Wachovia Bank)    3.50    12/7/06    5,655,000 a    5,655,000 
Connecticut Health and Educational             
Facilities Authority, Revenue                 
(University of New Haven                 
Issue) (LOC; Wachovia Bank)    3.46    12/7/06    500,000 a    500,000 
Connecticut Health and Educational             
Facilities Authority, Revenue                 
(Westminster School Issue)                 
(LOC; Bank of America)    3.47    12/7/06    1,000,000 a    1,000,000 
Connecticut Housing Finance                 
Authority (Housing Mortgage                 
Finance Program)    3.90    5/15/07    150,000    150,162 
Connecticut Housing Finance                 
Authority (Housing Mortgage                 
Finance Program) (Insured; AMBAC             
and Liquidity Facility; FHLB)    3.52    12/7/06    6,000,000 a    6,000,000 
Connecticut Housing Finance                 
Authority (Housing Mortgage                 
Finance Program) (Liquidity                 
Facility; Merrill Lynch                 
Capital Services)    3.53    12/7/06    1,000,000 a,b    1,000,000 
Connecticut Housing Finance                 
Authority, Revenue (GIC;                 
Rabobank Nederland and                 
Liquidity Facility; Merrill Lynch)    3.53    12/7/06    115,000 a,b    115,000 
Connecticut Housing Finance                 
Authority, Revenue (Liquidity                 
Facility; Citibank NA)    3.54    12/7/06    6,410,000 a,b    6,410,000 
Connecticut Housing Finance                 
Authority, Revenue (Liquidity                 
Facility; FHLMC)    3.58    12/7/06    8,078,000 a    8,078,000 
Connecticut Resources Recovery                 
Authority, RRR, Refunding                 
(Bridgeport Resco Company,                 
L.P. Project) (Insured; MBIA)    5.00    1/1/07    250,000    250,279 

The Fund 9


STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
Short-Term    Coupon    Maturity    Principal     
Investments (continued)    Rate (%)    Date    Amount ($)    Value ($) 





Connecticut (continued)                 
Danbury,                 
GO Notes, BAN    4.50    8/3/07    1,000,000    1,005,048 
Groton City,                 
GO Notes, BAN    4.50    2/14/07    500,000    500,991 
Ledyard,                 
GO Notes, BAN    4.00    7/16/07    2,000,000    2,005,944 
Milford,                 
GO Notes, BAN    4.00    5/4/07    1,450,000    1,453,031 
Milford,                 
GO Notes, BAN    4.00    11/2/07    1,000,000    1,004,172 
Monroe,                 
GO Notes, BAN    4.50    3/16/07    750,000    752,083 
New Haven,                 
CP (LOC; Landesbank                 
Hessen-Thuringen Girozentrale)    3.53    12/7/06    4,500,000    4,500,000 
Northeast Tax Exempt Bond                 
Grantor Trust, Revenue                 
(LOC; Bank of America)    3.62    12/7/06    3,533,000 a,b    3,533,000 
Redding,                 
GO Notes, BAN    3.88    7/31/07    2,160,000    2,165,267 
Regional School District Number                 
Five, GO Notes, BAN    4.25    11/28/07    1,000,000    1,006,991 
Regional School District Number                 
Ten, GO Notes, BAN    4.50    8/13/07    1,295,000    1,302,149 
Shelton Housing Authority,                 
Revenue (Crosby Commons                 
Project) (LOC; Wachovia Bank)    3.51    12/7/06    1,525,000 a    1,525,000 
South Central Connecticut Regional             
Water Authority, Water System                 
Revenue (Insured; MBIA and                 
Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan                 
Chase Bank)    3.47    12/7/06    600,000 a    600,000 

10

Short-Term    Coupon    Maturity    Principal     
Investments (continued)    Rate (%)    Date    Amount ($)    Value ($) 





Connecticut (continued)                 
Southeastern Connecticut Water                 
Authority, Working Capital and                 
Organizational Fund Notes    4.00    3/9/07    500,000    500,648 
University of Connecticut,                 
GO Notes    4.25    4/1/07    125,000    125,266 
West Haven,                 
GO Notes (Insured; AMBAC)    5.13    1/15/07    100,000    100,180 
U.S. Related—6.0%                 
Puerto Rico Government Development                 
Bank, Senior Notes (Liquidity                 
Facility; Merrill Lynch                 
Capital Services and LOC;                 
Merrill Lynch)    3.55    12/7/06    8,245,000 a,b    8,245,000 





 
Total Investments (cost $138,346,523)            100.4%    138,346,523 
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables            (.4%)    (574,448) 
Net Assets            100.0%    137,772,075 

a Securities payable on demand.Variable interest rate—subject to periodic change. 
b Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in 
transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At November 30, 2006, these 
securities amounted to $33,993,000 or 24.7% of net assets. 

The Fund 11


STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
Summary of Abbreviations         
 
ACA    American Capital Access    AGC    ACE Guaranty Corporation 
AGIC    Asset Guaranty Insurance    AMBAC    American Municipal Bond 
    Company        Assurance Corporation 
ARRN    Adjustable Rate Receipt Notes    BAN    Bond Anticipation Notes 
BIGI    Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance    BPA    Bond Purchase Agreement 
CGIC    Capital Guaranty Insurance    CIC    Continental Insurance 
    Company        Company 
CIFG    CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty    CMAC    Capital Market Assurance 
            Corporation 
COP    Certificate of Participation    CP    Commercial Paper 
EDR    Economic Development Revenue    EIR    Environmental Improvement 
            Revenue 
FGIC    Financial Guaranty Insurance         
    Company    FHA    Federal Housing Administration 
FHLB    Federal Home Loan Bank    FHLMC    Federal Home Loan Mortgage 
            Corporation 
FNMA    Federal National         
    Mortgage Association    FSA    Financial Security Assurance 
GAN    Grant Anticipation Notes    GIC    Guaranteed Investment Contract 
GNMA    Government National         
    Mortgage Association    GO    General Obligation 
HR    Hospital Revenue    IDB    Industrial Development Board 
IDC    Industrial Development Corporation    IDR    Industrial Development Revenue 
LOC    Letter of Credit    LOR    Limited Obligation Revenue 
LR    Lease Revenue    MBIA    Municipal Bond Investors Assurance 
            Insurance Corporation 
MFHR    Multi-Family Housing Revenue    MFMR    Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue 
PCR    Pollution Control Revenue    PILOT    Payment in Lieu of Taxes 
RAC    Revenue Anticipation Certificates    RAN    Revenue Anticipation Notes 
RAW    Revenue Anticipation Warrants    RRR    Resources Recovery Revenue 
SAAN    State Aid Anticipation Notes    SBPA    Standby Bond Purchase Agreement 
SFHR    Single Family Housing Revenue    SFMR    Single Family Mortgage Revenue 
SONYMA    State of New York Mortgage Agency    SWDR    Solid Waste Disposal Revenue 
TAN    Tax Anticipation Notes    TAW    Tax Anticipation Warrants 
TRAN    Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes    XLCA    XL Capital Assurance 

12

Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited)     
 
Fitch    or    Moody’s    or    Standard & Poor’s    Value (%)  






F1+,F1        VMIG1,MIG1,P1        SP1+,SP1,A1+,A1    88.8 
AAA,AA,A c        Aaa,Aa,A c        AAA,AA,A c    3.0 
Not Rated d        Not Rated d        Not Rated d    8.2 
                    100.0 

    Based on total investments. 
c    Notes which are not F, MIG and SP rated are represented by bond ratings of the issuers. 
d    Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to 
    be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund may invest. 
See notes to financial statements. 

The Fund 13


STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

November 30, 2006

    Cost    Value 



Assets ($):         
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments    138,346,523    138,346,523 
Interest receivable        617,625 
Prepaid expenses        12,393 
        138,976,541 



Liabilities ($):         
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 2(b)        62,053 
Cash overdraft due to custodian        905,460 
Payable for investment securities purchased        126,196 
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed        16,207 
Accrued expenses        94,550 
        1,204,466 



Net Assets ($)        137,772,075 



Composition of Net Assets ($):         
Paid-in capital        137,772,075 



Net Assets ($)        137,772,075 



Shares Outstanding         
(1 billion shares of $.001 par value Common Stock authorized)    137,783,518 
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($)    1.00 

See notes to financial statements.
14

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended November 30, 2006
Investment Income ($):     
Interest Income    4,668,026 
Expenses:     
Management fee—Note 2(a)    697,642 
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 2(b)    117,137 
Professional fees    49,694 
Registration fees    18,628 
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports    17,142 
Custodian fees    14,193 
Director’s fees and expenses—Note 2(c)    7,877 
Miscellaneous    23,186 
Total Expenses    945,499 
Less—reduction in management fee     
due to undertaking—Note 2(a)    (41,473) 
Net Expenses    904,026 
Investment Income—Net    3,764,000 


Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 1(b) ($): 
Net realized gain (loss) on investments    14,359 
Net unrealized depreciation on investments    (819) 
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments    13,540 
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations    3,777,540 

See notes to financial statements.

The Fund 15


STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

    Year Ended    Two Months Ended    Year Ended 
    November 30, 2006    November 30, 2005 a    September 30, 2005 




Operations ($):             
Investment income—net    3,764,000    537,420    2,158,017 
Net realized gain (loss)             
on investments    14,359    543    21 
Net unrealized appreciation             
(depreciation) on investments    (819)    349    453 
Net Increase (Decrease) in             
Net Assets Resulting             
from Operations    3,777,540    538,312    2,158,491 




Dividends to Shareholders from ($):         
Investment income—net:    (3,764,000)    (537,420)    (2,158,017) 




Capital Stock Transactions             
($1.00 per share):             
Net proceeds from shares sold:    281,580,542    58,341,993    244,027,953 
Dividends reinvested:    3,709,687    521,018    2,122,365 
Cost of shares redeemed:    (296,949,020)    (65,618,185)    (236,035,608) 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets             
from Capital Stock Transactions    (11,658,791)    (6,755,174)    10,114,710 
Total Increase (Decrease)             
in Net Assets    (11,645,251)    (6,754,282)    10,115,184 




Net Assets ($):             
Beginning of Period    149,417,326    156,171,608    146,056,424 
End of Period    137,772,075    149,417,326    156,171,608 

a The fund has changed its fiscal year end from September 30 to November 30.
See notes to financial statements.
16

  FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and dis-tributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.

        Two Months                 
    Year Ended    Ended                 
    November 30,    November 30,        Year Ended September 30, 


    2006    2005 a    2005    2004    2003    2002 







Per Share Data ($):                         
Net asset value                         
beginning of period    1.00    1.00    1.00    1.00    1.00    1.00 
Investment Operations:                         
Investment income—net    .027    .003    .014    .005    .006    0.10 
Distributions:                         
Dividends from investment                     
income—net    (.027)    (.003)    (.014)    (.005)    (.006)    (0.10) 
Net asset value,                         
end of period    1.00    1.00    1.00    1.00    1.00    1.00 







Total Return (%)    2.73    2.09b    1.44    .47    .57    .99 







Ratios/Supplemental                         
Data (%):                         
Ratio of total expenses                         
to average net assets    .68    .72b    .67    .64    .65    .65 
Ratio of net expenses                         
to average net assets    .65    .65b    .65    .63    .64    .64 
Ratio of net investment                         
income to average                         
net assets    2.70    2.09b    1.44    .47    .58    1.00 







Net Assets, end of period                     
($ X 1,000)    137,772    149,417    156,172    146,056    160,715    197,363 

a    The fund has changed its fiscal year end from September 30 to November 30. 
b    Annualized. 
See notes to financial statements. 

The Fund 17


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies

Dreyfus Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc. (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a non-diversified open-end management investment company.The fund’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income exempt from federal and Connecticut state income taxes as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”) serves as the fund’s investment adviser.The Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation (“Mellon Financial”). Dreyfus Service Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.

On December 4, 2006, Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York Company, Inc. announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement to merge. The new company will be called The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. As part of this transaction, Dreyfus would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation.The transaction is subject to certain regulatory approvals and the approval of The Bank of New York Company, Inc.’s and Mellon Financial’s shareholders, as well as other customary conditions to closing. Subject to such approvals and the satisfaction of the other conditions, Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York Company, Inc. expect the transaction to be completed in the third quarter of 2007.

On August 2, 2005, the Board of Directors approved a change in the fund’s fiscal year end from September 30 to November 30.

It is the fund’s policy to maintain a continuous net asset value per share of $1.00; the fund has adopted certain investment, portfolio valuation and dividend and distribution policies to enable it to do so.There is no assurance, however, that the fund will be able to maintain a stable net asset value per share of $1.00.

The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use

18

of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.

(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 of the Act, which has been determined by the Board of Directors to represent the fair value of the fund’s investments.

On September 20, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes an authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements. The application of FAS 157 is required for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management does not believe that the application of this standard will have a material impact on the financial statements of the fund.

(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Realized gain and loss from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Cost of investments represents amortized cost.

The fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby the fund receives earnings credits from the custodian when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits, if any, as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.

The fund follows an investment policy of investing primarily in municipal obligations of one state. Economic changes affecting the

The Fund 19


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

state and certain of its public bodies and municipalities may affect the ability of issuers within the state to pay interest on, or repay principal of, municipal obligations held by the fund.

(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gain, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gain can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gain.

(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.

On July 13, 2006, the FASB released FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority.Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. Management does not believe that the application of this standard will have a material impact on the financial statements of the fund.

At November 30, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were substantially the same as for financial reporting purposes.

20

The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended November 30, 2006 and November 30, 2005, were all tax exempt income.

At November 30, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statement of Investments).

NOTE 2—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:

(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .50% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.The Manager had undertaken from December 1, 2005 through November 30, 2006 to reduce the management fee paid by the fund, to the extent that the fund’s aggregate annual expenses, exclusive of taxes, brokerage fees, interest on borrowings and extraordinary expenses, exceed an annual rate of .65% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets. The reduction in management fee, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $41,473 during the period ended November 30, 2006.

(b) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, the fund reimburses the Distributor an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets for certain allocated expenses of providing personal services and/or maintaining shareholder accounts.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. During the period ended November 30, 2006, the fund was charged $71,824 pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.

The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund.

The Fund 21


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

During the period ended November 30, 2006, the fund was charged $29,130 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.

During the period ended November 30, 2006, the fund was charged $4,184 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.

The components of Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $56,506 chief compliance officer fees $1,704, transfer agency per account fees $4,840 and shareholder servicing fee $1,000, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $1,997.

(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.

22

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Dreyfus Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Dreyfus Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc., including the statement of investments, as of November 30, 2006, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets and financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting.Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and others or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from others were not received.We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund, Inc. at November 30, 2006, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the indicated periods, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

  New York, New York
January 10, 2007

The Fund 23


IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)

In accordance with federal tax law, the fund hereby designates all the dividends paid from investment income-net during the fiscal period ended November 30, 2006 as “exempt-interest dividends” (not subject to regular federal and, for individuals who are Connecticut residents, Connecticut personal income taxes). As required by federal tax law rules, shareholders will receive notification of their portion of the fund’s exempt-interest dividends paid for the 2006 calendar year on Form 1099-INT, which will be mailed by January 31, 2007.

PROXY RESULTS (Unaudited)

The fund held a special meeting of shareholders on September 20, 2006.The proposal considered at the meeting, and the results, are as follows:

        Shares     



    Votes For        Authority Withheld 



To elect additional Board Members:             
Hodding Carter III     65,905,318        3,730,796 
Ehud Houminer     68,423,444        1,212,670 
Richard C. Leone     68,626,206        1,009,908 
Hans C. Mautner     68,555,048        1,081,066 
Robin A. Melvin     68,580,359        1,055,755 
John E. Zuccotti     68,626,206        1,009,908 

Each new Board member’s term commenced on January 1, 2007.

In addition Joseph S. DiMartino, David W. Burke, Gordon J. Davis, Joni Evans, Arnold S. Hiatt and Burton N. Wallack continue as Board members of the fund.

24

BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited)

Joseph S. DiMartino (63)
Chairman of the Board (1995)
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
• Corporate Director and Trustee
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:
  • The Muscular Dystrophy Association, Director
  • Century Business Services, Inc., a provider of outsourcing functions for small and medium size companies, Director
  • The Newark Group, a provider of a national market of paper recovery facilities, paperboard mills and paperboard converting plants, Director
  • Sunair Services Corporation, engaging in the design, manufacture and sale of high frequency systems for long-range voice and data communications, as well as providing certain outdoor-related services to homes and businesses, Director

No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 190 ———————

David W. Burke (70) Board Member (1994)

Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:

• Corporate Director and Trustee.

Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:

  • John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, Director
  • U.S.S. Constitution Museum, Director

No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 81 ———————

William Hodding Carter III (71) Board Member (2006)

Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:

  • Professor of Leadership & Public Policy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (January 1, 2006-present)
  • President and Chief Executive Officer of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation (February 1, 1998-February 1, 2006)
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:
  • The Century Foundation, Emeritus Director
  • The Enterprise Corporation of the Delta, Director

No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 28 ———————

Gordon J. Davis (65) Board Member (1995)

Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:

  • Partner in the law firm of LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, LLP
  • President, Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc. (2001)
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:
  • Consolidated Edison, Inc., a utility company, Director
  • Phoenix Companies, Inc., a life insurance company, Director
  • Board Member/Trustee for several not-for-profit groups
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 37

The Fund 25


BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)

Joni Evans (64)
Board Member (1990)
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
  • Principal, Joni Evans Ltd.
  • Senior Vice President of the William Morris Agency (2005)
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 28
  ———————
Arnold S. Hiatt (79)
Board Member (1990)

Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:

• Chairman of The Stride Rite Charitable Foundation

Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:
  • Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum,Trustee
  • John Merck Fund, a charitable trust,Trustee
  • Business for Social Responsibility, Director
  • The A.M. Fund,Trustee
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 28

———————

Ehud Houminer (66) Board Member (2006)

Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:

• Executive-in-Residence at the Columbia Business School, Columbia University Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:

  • Avnet Inc., an electronics distributor, Director
  • International Advisory Board to the MBA Program School of Management, Ben Gurion University, Chairman
  • Explore Charter School, Brooklyn, NY, Chairman
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 76
  ———————
Richard C. Leone (66)
Board Member (2006)
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
  • President of The Century Foundation (formerly,The Twentieth Century Fund, Inc.), a tax exempt research foundation engaged in the study of economic, foreign policy and domestic issues
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:
  • The American Prospect, Director
  • Center for American Progress, Director
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 28
26

Hans C. Mautner (69)
Board Member (2006)
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:
  • President—International Division and an Advisory Director of Simon Property Group, a real estate investment company (1998-present)
  • Director and Vice Chairman of Simon Property Group (1998-2003)
  • Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Simon Global Limited (1999-present)
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:
  • Capital and Regional PLC, a British co-investing real estate asset manager, Director
  • Member - Board of Managers of: Mezzacappa Long/Short Fund LLC
    Mezzacappa Partners LLC

No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 28 ———————

Robin A. Melvin (43) Board Member (2006)

Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:

  • Director, Boisi Family foundation, a private family foundation that supports youth-serving organizations that promote the self sufficiency of youth from disadvantaged circumstances

No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 28 ———————

Burton N. Wallack (56) Board Member (1991)

Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:

• President and co-owner of Wallack Management Company, a real estate management company

No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 28 ———————

John E. Zuccotti (69) Board Member (2006)

Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years:

  • Chairman of Brookfield Financial Properties, Inc.
  • Senior Counsel of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP
  • Chairman of the Real Estate Board of New York
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations:
  • Emigrant Savings Bank, Director
  • Wellpoint, Inc., Director
  • Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Director
  • Columbia University,Trustee
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation,Trustee

No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 28 ———————

Once elected all Board Members serve for an indefinite term, but achieve Emeritus status upon reaching age 80.The address of the Board Members and Officers is in c/o The Dreyfus Corporation, 200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166. Additional information about the Board Members is available in the fund’s Statement of Additional Information which can be obtained from Dreyfus free of charge by calling this toll free number: 1-800-554-4611.

Samuel Chase, Emeritus Board Member

The Fund 27


OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)

J. DAVID OFFICER, President since    JANETTE E. FARRAGHER, Vice President 
December 2006.    and Assistant Secretary since 
Chief Operating Officer,Vice Chairman and a    August 2005. 
director of the Manager, and an officer of 90    Associate General Counsel of the Manager, 
investment companies (comprised of 190    and an officer of 91 investment companies 
portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 58    (comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the 
years old and has been an employee of the    Manager. She is 43 years old and has been an 
Manager since April 1, 1998.    employee of the Manager since February 1984. 
 
MARK N. JACOBS, Vice President since    JOHN B. HAMMALIAN, Vice President and 
March 2000.    Assistant Secretary since August 2005. 
Executive Vice President, Secretary and    Associate General Counsel of the Manager, 
General Counsel of the Manager, and an    and an officer of 91 investment companies 
officer of 91 investment companies (comprised    (comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the 
of 206 portfolios) managed by the Manager.    Manager. He is 43 years old and has been an 
He is 60 years old and has been an employee    employee of the Manager since February 1991. 
 
of the Manager since June 1977.    ROBERT R. MULLERY, Vice President and 
MICHAEL A. ROSENBERG, Vice President    Assistant Secretary since August 2005. 
and Secretary since August 2005.    Associate General Counsel of the Manager, 
Associate General Counsel of the Manager,    and an officer of 91 investment companies 
and an officer of 91 investment companies    (comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the 
(comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the    Manager. He is 54 years old and has been an 
Manager. He is 46 years old and has been an    employee of the Manager since May 1986. 
 
employee of the Manager since October 1991.    JEFF PRUSNOFSKY, Vice President and 
JAMES BITETTO, Vice President and    Assistant Secretary since August 2005. 
Assistant Secretary since August 2005.    Associate General Counsel of the Manager, 
Associate General Counsel and Assistant    and an officer of 91 investment companies 
Secretary of the Manager, and an officer of 91    (comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the 
investment companies (comprised of 206    Manager. He is 41 years old and has been an 
portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 40    employee of the Manager since October 1990. 
 
years old and has been an employee of the    JAMES WINDELS, Treasurer since 
Manager since December 1996.    November 2001. 
JONI LACKS CHARATAN, Vice President    Director – Mutual Fund Accounting of the 
and Assistant Secretary since    Manager, and an officer of 91 investment 
August 2005.    companies (comprised of 206 portfolios) 
Associate General Counsel of the Manager,    managed by the Manager. He is 48 years old 
and an officer of 91 investment companies    and has been an employee of the Manager 
(comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the    since April 1985. 
 
Manager. She is 51 years old and has been an    ERIK D. NAVILOFF, Assistant Treasurer 
employee of the Manager since October 1988.    since August 2005. 
JOSEPH M. CHIOFFI, Vice President and    Senior Accounting Manager – Taxable Fixed 
Assistant Secretary since August 2005.    Income Funds of the Manager, and an officer 
Associate General Counsel of the Manager,    of 91 investment companies (comprised of 206 
and an officer of 91 investment companies    portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 38 
(comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the    years old and has been an employee of the 
Manager. He is 45 years old and has been an    Manager since November 1992. 
employee of the Manager since June 2000.     

28


ROBERT ROBOL, Assistant Treasurer    JOSEPH W. CONNOLLY, Chief Compliance 
since August 2003.    Officer since October 2004. 
Senior Accounting Manager – Money Market    Chief Compliance Officer of the Manager and 
and Municipal Bond Funds of the Manager,    The Dreyfus Family of Funds (91 investment 
and an officer of 91 investment companies    companies, comprised of 206 portfolios). From 
(comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the    November 2001 through March 2004, Mr. 
Manager. He is 42 years old and has been an    Connolly was first Vice-President, Mutual 
employee of the Manager since October 1988.    Fund Servicing for Mellon Global Securities 
 
ROBERT SVAGNA, Assistant Treasurer    Services. In that capacity, Mr. Connolly was 
since August 2005.    responsible for managing Mellon’s Custody, 
    Fund Accounting and Fund Administration 
Senior Accounting Manager – Equity Funds of    services to third-party mutual fund clients. He 
the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment    is 49 years old and has served in various 
companies (comprised of 206 portfolios)    capacities with the Manager since 1980, 
managed by the Manager. He is 39 years old    including manager of the firm’s Fund 
and has been an employee of the Manager    Accounting Department from 1997 through 
since November 1990.    October 2001. 
 
GAVIN C. REILLY, Assistant Treasurer    WILLIAM GERMENIS, Anti-Money 
since December 2005.    Laundering Compliance Officer since 
Tax Manager of the Investment Accounting    September 2002. 
and Support Department of the Manager, and    Vice President and Anti-Money Laundering 
an officer of 91 investment companies    Compliance Officer of the Distributor, and the 
(comprised of 206 portfolios) managed by the    Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer 
Manager. He is 38 years old and has been an    of 87 investment companies (comprised of 202 
employee of the Manager since April 1991.    portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 36 
    years old and has been an employee of the 
    Distributor since October 1998. 

The Fund 29


For More    Information 


 
Dreyfus        Transfer Agent & 
Connecticut Municipal    Dividend Disbursing Agent 
Money Market Fund, Inc.     
        Dreyfus Transfer, Inc. 
200 Park Avenue     
        200 Park Avenue 
New York, NY    10166     
        New York, NY 10166 
 
Manager        Distributor 
The Dreyfus Corporation     
        Dreyfus Service Corporation 
200 Park Avenue     
        200 Park Avenue 
New York, NY    10166     
        New York, NY 10166 
Custodian         
The Bank of New York     
One Wall Street     
New York, NY    10286     

Telephone 1-800-645-6561

Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 
E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com 
Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.dreyfus.com 

The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund's Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-551-8090.

Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.

© 2007 Dreyfus Service Corporation


Item 2. Code of Ethics.

The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. There have been no amendments to, or waivers in connection with, the Code of Ethics during the period covered by this Report.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The Registrant's Board has determined that Joseph S. DiMartino, a member of the Audit Committee of the Board, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Joseph S. DiMartino is "independent" as defined by the SEC for purposes of audit committee financial expert determinations.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

(a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the "Reporting Periods") for professional services rendered by the Registrant's principal accountant (the "Auditor") for the audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $66,244 in 2005 and $34,696 in 2006.

(b) Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 were $0 in 2005 and $0 in 2006.

The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for non-audit assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-investment adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant ("Service Affiliates"), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the Service Affiliate, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2005 and $0 in 2006.

Note: For the second paragraph in each of (b) through (d) of this Item 4, certain of such services were not pre-approved prior to May 6, 2003, when such services were required to be pre-approved. On and after May 6, 2003, 100% of all services provided by the Auditor were pre-approved as required. For comparative purposes, the fees shown assume that all such services were pre-approved, including services that were not pre-approved prior to the compliance date of the pre-approval requirement.

(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning ("Tax Services") were $2,788 in 2005 and $3,347 in 2006. These services consisted of (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, and (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held.


The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Tax Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2005 and $0 in 2006.

(d) All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item, were $71 in 2005 and $154 in 2006. These services consisted of a review of the Registrant's anti-money laundering program.

The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Non-Audit Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, other than the services reported in paragraphs (b) through (c) of this Item, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2005 and $0 in 2006.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Registrant's Audit Committee has established policies and procedures (the "Policy") for pre-approval (within specified fee limits) of the Auditor's engagements for non-audit services to the Registrant and Service Affiliates without specific case-by-case consideration. Pre-approval considerations include whether the proposed services are compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence. Pre-approvals pursuant to the Policy are considered annually.

Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to Service Affiliates, for the Reporting Periods were $917,339 in 2005 and $375,571 in 2006.

Auditor Independence. The Registrant's Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval) is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence.

Item 5.    Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. 
    Not applicable. 
Item 6.    Schedule of Investments. 
    Not applicable. 
Item 7.    Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management 
    Investment Companies. 
    Not applicable. 
Item 8.    Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. 
    Not applicable. 
Item 9.    Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and 
    Affiliated Purchasers. 
    Not applicable. 
Item 10.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. 

The Registrant has a Nominating Committee (the "Committee"), which is responsible for selecting and nominating persons for election or appointment by the Registrant's Board as Board members. The Committee has adopted a Nominating Committee Charter (the "Charter"). Pursuant to the Charter, the


Committee will consider recommendations for nominees from shareholders submitted to the Secretary of the Registrant, c/o The Dreyfus Corporation Legal Department, 200 Park Avenue, 8th Floor East, New York, New York 10166. A nomination submission must include information regarding the recommended nominee as specified in the Charter. This information includes all information relating to a recommended nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxy statements for the election of Board members, as well as information sufficient to evaluate the factors to be considered by the Committee, including character and integrity, business and professional experience, and whether the person has the ability to apply sound and independent business judgment and would act in the interests of the Registrant and its shareholders.

Nomination submissions are required to be accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the shareholders, and such additional information must be provided regarding the recommended nominee as reasonably requested by the Committee.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1)    Code of ethics referred to in Item 2. 
(a)(2)    Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) 
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. 
(a)(3)    Not applicable. 
(b)    Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) 
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. 


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DREYFUS CONNECTICUT MUNICIPAL MONEY MARKET FUND, INC.

By:    /s/ J. David Officer 
    J. David Officer 
    President 
 
Date:    January 29, 2007 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 
1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the 
capacities and on the dates indicated. 
 
By:    /s/ J. David Officer 
    J. David Officer 
    President 
 
Date:    January 29, 2007 
 
By:    /s/ James Windels 
    James Windels 
    Treasurer 
 
Date:    January 29, 2007 
 
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
    (a)(1)    Code of ethics referred to in Item 2. 
 
    (a)(2)    Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a- 
    2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT) 
 
    (b)    Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a- 
    2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)