XML 54 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.1
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Note 13 - Fair Value Measurements

 

Authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2: Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities that are observable for the asset or liability; or

 

Level 3: Unobservable pricing inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources, such as discounted cash flow models or valuations.

 

Financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our policy is to recognize transfers in and/or out of fair value hierarchy as of the end of the reporting period for which the event or change in circumstances caused the transfer. We have consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed below for all periods presented.

 

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy:

 

   Fair Value Measurements Using 
(in thousands)  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
December 31, 2019                
Assets:                
Commodity derivatives  $-   $7,079   $-   $7,079 
Liabilities:                    
Commodity derivatives  $-   $556   $-   $556 
December 31, 2018                    
Assets:                    
Commodity derivatives  $-   $7,022   $-   $7,022 

 

Commodity Derivatives 

 

As of December 31, 2019, our commodity derivative financial instruments are comprised of natural gas and oil swaps and costless collars. The fair values of these agreements are determined under an income valuation technique. The valuation model requires a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, published forward prices, volatilities for options and discount rates, as appropriate. Our estimates of fair value of derivatives include consideration of the counterparty's credit worthiness, our credit worthiness and the time value of money. The consideration of these factors results in an estimated exit-price for each derivative asset or liability under a market place participant's view. All significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; therefore, our derivative instruments are included within the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

 

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis; however they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances. The fair value of the following assets and liabilities are based on unobservable pricing inputs and therefore, are included within the Level 3 fair value hierarchy.

 

Firm transportation contracts. We assume, at times, certain firm transportation contracts as part of our acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties. The fair value of the firm transportation contract obligations was determined based upon the contractual obligations assumed by us and discounted based upon our effective borrowing rate.

 

Debt Discount. The fair value of the debt discount from the 1,425 and 585 additional Class A Units issued in connection with the Subordinated Notes and 2018 Subordinated Notes was $1.3 million and $490,000, respectively. The debt discount was based on the relative fair value of Class A Units. Class A Units were issued contemporaneously at $1,000 per Class A Unit.

 

Asset Retirement Obligation. The fair value of our asset retirement obligation liability is recorded in the period in which it is incurred or assumed by taking into account the cost of abandoning oil and gas wells ranging from $20,000 to $45,000, which is based on our historical experience and industry expectations for similar work; the estimated timing of reclamation ranging from one to 75 years based on estimates from reserve engineers; an inflation rate between 1.52% to 2.79%; and a credit adjusted risk-free rate between 3.28% to 8.27%, which takes into account our credit risk and the time value of money. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we had minimal additions and approximately $290,000 of revisions to asset retirement obligations. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded additions to asset retirement obligations of approximately $14.1 million, which was the result of the Carbon California, Seneca, Liberty, and OIE Membership Acquisitions.