Note 2 - Investments in and Advances To Local Partnerships	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Notes
Note 2 - Investments in and Advances To Local Partnerships	Note 2 - Investments In and Advances to Local Partnerships As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Partnership held limited partnership interests in zero and two Local Partnerships, located in two states. As a limited partner of the Local Partnerships, the Partnership does not have authority over day-to-day management of the Local Partnerships or their properties (the "Apartment Complexes"). The general partners responsible for management of the Local Partnerships (the "Local Operating General Partners") are not affiliated with the General Partner of the Partnership, except as discussed below. At December 31, 2014, the Local Partnerships owned residential projects consisting of 355 apartment units. The projects owned by the Local Partnerships in which NTCI-II has invested were developed by the Local Operating General Partners who acquired the sites and applied for applicable mortgages and subsidies, if any. NTCI-II became the principal limited partner in these Local Partnerships pursuant to arm's-length negotiations with the Local Operating General Partners. As a limited partner, NTCI-II's liability for obligations of the Local Partnerships is limited to its investment. The Local Operating General Partner of the Local Partnerships retains responsibility for developing, constructing, maintaining, operating and managing the Projects. Under certain circumstances, an affiliate of NAPICO or NTCI-II may act as the Local Operating General Partner. An affiliate, National Tax Credit Inc. II ("NTC-II") is acting either as a special limited partner or non-managing administrative general partner (the “Administrative General Partner”) of each Local Partnership in which the Partnership had an investment. The Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Partnerships or exercise control over the activities and operations, including refinancing or selling decisions, of the Local Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Local Partnerships using the equity method. The Partnership is allocated profits and losses of the Local Partnerships based upon its respective ownership percentage (between 98.9% and 99.0%). The Partnership is allocated profits and losses and receives distributions from refinancings and sales in accordance with the Local Partnerships’ partnership agreements. These agreements usually limit the Partnership’s distributions to an amount substantially less than its ownership percentage in the Local Partnership. The individual investments are carried at cost plus the Partnership’s share of the Local Partnership’s profits less the Partnership’s share of the Local Partnership’s losses, distributions and impairment charges. See “Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for a description of the impairment policy. The Partnership is not legally liable for the obligations of the Local Partnerships and is not otherwise committed to provide additional support to them. Therefore, it does not recognize losses once its investment in each of the Local Partnerships reaches zero. Distributions from the Local Partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero. When the investment balance has been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the accompanying statements of operations. There were no such distributions received during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. For those investments where the Partnership has determined that the carrying value of its investments approximates the estimated fair value of those investments, the Partnership’s policy is to recognize equity in income of the Local Partnerships only to the extent of distributions received and amortization of acquisition costs from those Local Partnerships. Therefore, the Partnership limits its recognition of equity earnings to the amount it expects to ultimately realize. During September 2013, the Partnership entered into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement to assign its limited partnership interest in Michigan Beach to a third party for a total amount of $10.00. Additionally, during September 2013, the Partnership entered into a Loan Purchase Agreement with the same third party, to sell the second mortgage held by the Partnership for an amount equal to the outstanding principal on the Loan. In June 2015, the Partnership entered into an eighth amendment to each of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement and the Loan Purchase Agreement to, among other things, extend the closing date for the transaction to August 18, 2015. The sale closed on August 18, 2015 for approximately $3,596,000 which was applied $3,478,000 to repayment of the mortgage and $118,000 to gain on sale of partnership interest. In July 2015, the Partnership assigned its limited partnership interest in Lincoln Grove to an affiliate of the Local Operating General Partner for a total of $15,000. This amount was recognized as a gain on sales of limited partnership interest in Local Partnerships. As of December 31, 2014, the investment balance in one of the two Local Partnerships had been reduced to zero. The Partnership's remaining investment balance related to the mortgage note receivable, which is discussed in "Note 3 - Mortgage Note Receivable". At times, advances are made to Local Partnerships. Advances made by the Partnership to the individual Local Partnerships are considered part of the Partnership’s investment in limited partnerships. Advances made to Local Partnerships in which the investment balance has been reduced to zero or repayment is uncertain are charged to expense. The Partnership made advances of approximately $99,000 and $306,000 to Michigan Beach during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. While not obligated to make advances to any of the Local Partnerships, the Partnership did so in order to protect its economic investment in the Local Partnerships.

Note 2 - Investments in and Advances To Local Partnerships

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Note 2 - Investments in and Advances To Local Partnerships

Note 2 - Investments In and Advances to Local Partnerships

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Partnership held limited partnership interests in zero and two Local Partnerships, located in two states. As a limited partner of the Local Partnerships, the Partnership does not have authority over day-to-day management of the Local Partnerships or their properties (the "Apartment Complexes"). The general partners responsible for management of the Local Partnerships (the "Local Operating General Partners") are not affiliated with the General Partner of the Partnership, except as discussed below.

At December 31, 2014, the Local Partnerships owned residential projects consisting of 355 apartment units.

The projects owned by the Local Partnerships in which NTCI-II has invested were developed by the Local Operating General Partners who acquired the sites and applied for applicable mortgages and subsidies, if any. NTCI-II became the principal limited partner in these Local Partnerships pursuant to arm's-length negotiations with the Local Operating General Partners. As a limited partner, NTCI-II's liability for obligations of the Local Partnerships is limited to its investment. The Local Operating General Partner of the Local Partnerships retains responsibility for developing, constructing, maintaining, operating and managing the Projects. Under certain circumstances, an affiliate of NAPICO or NTCI-II may act as the Local Operating General Partner. An affiliate, National Tax Credit Inc. II ("NTC-II") is acting either as a special limited partner or non-managing administrative general partner (the “Administrative General Partner”) of each Local Partnership in which the Partnership had an investment.

The Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Partnerships or exercise control over the activities and operations, including refinancing or selling decisions, of the Local Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Local Partnerships using the equity method. The Partnership is allocated profits and losses of the Local Partnerships based upon its respective ownership percentage (between 98.9% and 99.0%). The Partnership is allocated profits and losses and receives distributions from refinancings and sales in accordance with the Local Partnerships’ partnership agreements. These agreements usually limit the Partnership’s distributions to an amount substantially less than its ownership percentage in the Local Partnership.

The individual investments are carried at cost plus the Partnership’s share of the Local Partnership’s profits less the Partnership’s share of the Local Partnership’s losses, distributions and impairment charges. See “Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for a description of the impairment policy. The Partnership is not legally liable for the obligations of the Local Partnerships and is not otherwise committed to provide additional support to them. Therefore, it does not recognize losses once its investment in each of the Local Partnerships reaches zero.

Distributions from the Local Partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero. When the investment balance has been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the accompanying statements of operations. There were no such distributions received during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

For those investments where the Partnership has determined that the carrying value of its investments approximates the estimated fair value of those investments, the Partnership’s policy is to recognize equity in income of the Local Partnerships only to the extent of distributions received and amortization of acquisition costs from those Local Partnerships. Therefore, the Partnership limits its recognition of equity earnings to the amount it expects to ultimately realize.

During September 2013, the Partnership entered into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement to assign its limited partnership interest in Michigan Beach to a third party for a total amount of $10.00. Additionally, during September 2013, the Partnership entered into a Loan Purchase Agreement with the same third party, to sell the second mortgage held by the Partnership for an amount equal to the outstanding principal on the Loan. In June 2015, the Partnership entered into an eighth amendment to each of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement and the Loan Purchase Agreement to, among other things, extend the closing date for the transaction to August 18, 2015. The sale closed on August 18, 2015 for approximately $3,596,000 which was applied $3,478,000 to repayment of the mortgage and $118,000 to gain on sale of partnership interest.

In July 2015, the Partnership assigned its limited partnership interest in Lincoln Grove to an affiliate of the Local Operating General Partner for a total of $15,000. This amount was recognized as a gain on sales of limited partnership interest in Local Partnerships.

As of December 31, 2014, the investment balance in one of the two Local Partnerships had been reduced to zero. The Partnership's remaining investment balance related to the mortgage note receivable, which is discussed in "Note 3 - Mortgage Note Receivable".

At times, advances are made to Local Partnerships. Advances made by the Partnership to the individual Local Partnerships are considered part of the Partnership’s investment in limited partnerships. Advances made to Local Partnerships in which the investment balance has been reduced to zero or repayment is uncertain are charged to expense. The Partnership made advances of approximately $99,000 and $306,000 to Michigan Beach during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. While not obligated to make advances to any of the Local Partnerships, the Partnership did so in order to protect its economic investment in the Local Partnerships.