XML 29 R6.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Notes  
Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Organization

 

National Tax Credit Investors II (“NTCI II” or the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership formed under the California Revised Local Partnership Act as of January 12, 1990. The Partnership was formed to invest primarily in other limited partnerships (“Local Partnerships”) which own and operate multifamily housing complexes that are eligible for low income housing federal income tax credits (the “Housing Tax Credit”). The general partner of the Partnership is National Partnership Investments, LLC (the “General Partner” or “NAPICO”), a California limited liability company. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Bethesda Holdings II, LLC, a privately held real estate asset management company (“Bethesda”). Bethesda acquired the General Partner on December 19, 2012, pursuant to an option agreement with Aimco/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company (“Aimco”), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.  The business of NTCI II is conducted primarily by NAPICO. The Partnership shall continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2030, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the Partnership Agreement or law.

 

The General Partner has a one percent interest in operating profits and losses of the Partnership. The limited partners will be allocated the remaining 99 percent interest in proportion to their respective investments.

 

Upon total or partial liquidation of the Partnership or the disposition or partial disposition of a project or project interest and distribution of the proceeds, the General Partner will be entitled to a property disposition fee as mentioned in the partnership agreement.  The limited partners will have a priority item equal to their invested capital plus 6 percent priority return as defined in the partnership agreement. This property disposition fee may accrue but shall not be paid until the limited partners have received distributions equal to 100 percent of their capital contributions plus the 6 percent priority return. No disposition fees have been paid or accrued.

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Partnership had outstanding 72,017 and 72,032 limited partnership interests, respectively.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks. At certain times, the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the limit on insured deposits. The entire cash balance at December 31, 2012 was maintained by an affiliated management company on behalf of affiliated entities in a cash concentration account. In 2013 the affiliated management company maintained separate cash accounts with an FDIC insured bank for each of its affiliated entities including National Tax Credit Investors II.

 

Method of Accounting for Investments in Local Partnerships

 

The investments in Local Partnerships are accounted for using the equity method. Acquisition fees, selection fees and other costs related to the acquisition of the projects have been capitalized as part of the investment account and are being amortized by the straight line method over the estimated lives of the underlying assets, which is generally 30 years.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Net Income Per Limited Partnership Interest

 

Net income per limited partnership interest was computed by dividing the limited partners' share of net income by the number of limited partnership interests outstanding at the beginning of the year.  The number of limited partnership interests used was 72,032 and 72,205 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Abandoned Interests

 

During 2013 and 2012, the number of limited partnership interests decreased by 15 and 173 units, respectively, due to limited partners abandoning their interests. In abandoning his or her partnership interests, a limited partner relinquishes all right, title and interest in the Partnership as of the date of the abandonment.

 

Mortgage Note Receivable

 

The Partnership reviews its mortgage note receivable whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  The Partnership has recorded its mortgage note receivable at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 at the amount at which the Partnership ultimately expects to receive. No impairment was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.  See “Note 3 – Mortgage Note Receivable” for further information.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

The Partnership reviews long-lived assets to determine if there has been any impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, the Partnership recognizes an impairment loss. There were no impairment losses recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value is defined as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. At December 31, 2013, the Partnership believes that the carrying amount of other assets and liabilities reported on the balance sheet that require such disclosure approximated their fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

 

Segment Reporting

 

ASC Topic 280-10, “Segment Reporting”, established standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. ASC Topic 280-10 also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. As defined in ASC Topic 280-10, the Partnership has only one reportable segment.

 

Variable Interest Entities

 

The Partnership consolidates any variable interest entities in which the Partnership holds a variable interest and is the primary beneficiary. Generally, a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is generally the entity that has (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

 

In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the Partnership considers qualitative and quantitative factors, including, but not limited to: which activities most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and which party controls such activities; the amount and characteristics of the Partnership’s investment; the obligation or likelihood for the Partnership or other investors to provide financial support; and the similarity with and significance to the business activities of the Partnership and the other investors.  Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current and future fair values and performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market conditions.

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Partnership held variable interests in two and four VIEs, respectively, for which the Partnership was not the primary beneficiary.  The Partnership has concluded, based on its qualitative consideration of the partnership agreement, the partnership structure and the role of the general partner in each of the Local Partnerships, that the general partner of each of the Local Partnerships is the primary beneficiary of the respective Local Partnership.  In making this determination, the Partnership considered the following factors:

 

·         the general partners conduct and manage the business of the Local Partnerships;

·         the general partners have the responsibility for and sole discretion over selecting a property management agent for the Local Partnerships’ underlying real estate properties;

·         the general partners are responsible for approving operating and capital budgets for the properties owned by the Local Partnerships;

·         the general partners are obligated to fund any recourse obligations of the Local Partnerships;

·         the general partners are authorized to borrow funds on behalf of the Local Partnerships; and

·         the Partnership, as a limited partner in each of the Local Partnerships, does not have the ability to direct or otherwise significantly influence the activities of the Local Partnerships that most significantly impact such entities’ economic performance.

 

The two VIEs at December 31, 2013 consisted of Local Partnerships that were directly engaged in the ownership and management of two apartment properties with a total of 355 units. The Partnership is involved with those VIEs as a non-controlling limited partner equity holder. The Partnership’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the unconsolidated VIEs is limited to the Partnership’s recorded investments in and receivables from these VIEs, which was approximately $3,478,000 and $3,533,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Partnership may be subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial support that the Partnership voluntarily provides in the future.