
12.	Commitments and Contingencies


(a)	Operating Leases

The Company leases office space in many U.S. locations. Outside the United States, larger leased sites include sites in Australia, China, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, and the United Kingdom. The Company also leases equipment and vehicles. Future minimum lease payments under all noncancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as of January 26, 2013 are as follows (in millions):



Fiscal Year	Amount
2013 (remaining six months)	$	182
2014	281
2015	237
2016	120
2017	83
Thereafter	226
Total	$	1,129


(b)	Purchase Commitments with Contract Manufacturers and Suppliers

The Company purchases components from a variety of suppliers and uses several contract manufacturers to provide manufacturing services for its products. During the normal course of business, in order to manage manufacturing lead times and help ensure adequate component supply, the Company enters into agreements with contract manufacturers and suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria as defined by the Company or establish the parameters defining the Company's requirements. A significant portion of the Company's reported purchase commitments arising from these agreements consists of firm, noncancelable, and unconditional commitments. In certain instances, these agreements allow the Company the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust the Company's requirements based on its business needs prior to firm orders being placed. As of January 26, 2013 and July 28, 2012, the Company had total purchase commitments for inventory of $3,824 million and $3,869 million, respectively.

The Company records a liability for firm, noncancelable, and unconditional purchase commitments for quantities in excess of its future demand forecasts consistent with the valuation of the Company's excess and obsolete inventory. As of January 26, 2013 and July 28, 2012, the liability for these purchase commitments was $169 million and $193 million, respectively, and was included in other current liabilities.


(c)	Other Commitments

In connection with the Company's business combinations and asset purchases, the Company has agreed to pay certain additional amounts contingent upon the achievement of certain agreed-upon technology, development, product, or other milestones or the continued employment with the Company of certain employees of the acquired entities. The Company recognized such compensation expense of $23 million and $14 million during the three months ended January 26, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, and $35 million and $28 million during the six months ended January 26, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively. As of January 26, 2013, the Company estimated that future compensation expense and contingent consideration of up to $1.1 billion may be required to be recognized pursuant to the applicable business combination and asset purchase agreements, which included a maximum potential $863 million in milestone payments related to Insieme as more fully discussed in the subsection entitled "Insieme" within section (d) immediately below.

The Company also has certain funding commitments, primarily related to its investments in privately held companies and venture funds, some of which are based on the achievement of certain agreed-upon milestones, and some of which are required to be funded on demand. The funding commitments were $133 million and $120 million as of January 26, 2013 and July 28, 2012, respectively.


(d)	Variable Interest Entities

VCE Joint Venture VCE is a joint venture that the Company formed in fiscal 2010 with EMC Corporation ("EMC"), with investments from VMware, Inc. ("VMware") and Intel Corporation. VCE helps organizations leverage best-in-class technologies and disciplines from Cisco, EMC, and VMware to enable the transformation to cloud computing.

As of January 26, 2013, the Company's cumulative gross investment in VCE was approximately $457 million, inclusive of accrued interest, and its ownership percentage was approximately 35%.

The Company accounts for its investment in VCE under the equity method, and its portion of VCE's net loss is recognized in other income (loss), net. The Company's consolidated share of VCE's losses, based upon its portion of the overall funding, was approximately 36.8% for each of the three and six months ended January 26, 2013 and January 28, 2012. As of January 26, 2013, the Company has recorded cumulative losses from VCE of $325 million since inception, of which losses of $44 million and $55 million were recorded for the three months ended January 26, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively, and a loss of $86 million was recorded for each of the six months ended January 26, 2013 and January 28, 2012. The Company's carrying value in VCE as of January 26, 2013 of $132 million is recorded in other assets.

Over the next 12 months, as VCE scales its operations, the Company expects that it will make additional investments in VCE and may incur additional losses proportionate with the Company's share ownership.

From time to time, EMC and Cisco may enter into guarantee agreements on behalf of VCE to indemnify third parties, such as customers, for monetary damages. Such guarantees were not material as of January 26, 2013.

Insieme In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company made an investment in Insieme, an early stage company focused on research and development in the data center market. As set forth in the agreement between the Company and Insieme, this investment includes $100 million of funding and a license to certain of the Company's technology. In addition, pursuant to a November 2012 amendment to the agreement between the Company and Insieme, the Company agreed to invest an additional $35 million in Insieme upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. As of January 26, 2013, the Company owned approximately 87% of Insieme as a result of these investments and has consolidated the results of Insieme in its Consolidated Financial Statements.

The net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests was not presented separately in the Consolidated Statements of Operations due to the amount being immaterial. In connection with this investment, the Company and Insieme have entered into a put/call option agreement that provides the Company with the right to purchase the remaining interests in Insieme. In addition, the noncontrolling interest holders can require the Company to purchase their shares upon the occurrence of certain events. If the Company acquires the remaining interests of Insieme, the noncontrolling interest holders are eligible to receive two milestone payments, which will be determined using agreed-upon formulas based on revenue for certain of Insieme's products. The Company will begin recognizing the amounts due under the milestone payments when it is determined that such payments are probable of being earned, which the Company expects may be in fiscal 2014. When such a determination is made, the milestone payments will then be recorded as compensation expense by the Company based on an estimate of the fair value of the amounts probable of being earned, pursuant to a vesting schedule. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the amounts probable of being earned and the continued vesting will result in adjustments to the recorded compensation expense. The maximum amount that could be recorded as compensation expense by the Company is approximately $863 million. This maximum amount was increased from the previous maximum of $750 million due to a November 2012 amendment to the agreement, as the parties recognized that higher staffing levels may be necessary to perform additional product development. The milestone payments, if earned, are expected to be paid primarily during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017.

Other Variable Interest Entities In the ordinary course of business, the Company has investments in other privately held companies and provides financing to certain customers. These other privately held companies and customers may be considered to be variable interest entities. The Company evaluates on an ongoing basis its investments in these other privately held companies and its customer financings and has determined that as of January 26, 2013 there were no other variable interest entities required to be consolidated in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.


(e)	Product Warranties and Guarantees

The following table summarizes the activity related to product warranty liability during the six months ended January 26, 2013 and January 28, 2012 (in millions):



	Six Months Ended
	January 26, 2013			January 28, 2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	415		$	342
Provision for warranties issued	319			331
Payments	(310		)	(266		)
Balance at end of period	$	424		$	407

The Company accrues for warranty costs as part of its cost of sales based on associated material product costs, labor costs for technical support staff, and associated overhead. The Company's products are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to five years, and for some products the Company provides a limited lifetime warranty.

In the normal course of business, the Company indemnifies other parties, including customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with the Company, with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed to hold the other parties harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors, and the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to the Company's agents. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the Company's limited history with prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under these agreements have not had a material effect on the Company's operating results, financial position, or cash flows.

The Company also provides financing guarantees, which are generally for various third-party financing arrangements to channel partners and other end-user customers. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company's other guarantee arrangements as of January 26, 2013 and July 28, 2012 that were subject to recognition and disclosure requirements were not material.


(f)	Legal Proceedings

Brazilian authorities have investigated the Company's Brazilian subsidiary and certain of its current and former employees, as well as a Brazilian importer of the Company's products, and its affiliates and employees, relating to alleged evasion of import taxes and alleged improper transactions involving the subsidiary and the importer. Brazilian tax authorities have assessed claims against the Company's Brazilian subsidiary based on a theory of joint liability with the Brazilian importer for import taxes, interest, and penalties. In addition to claims asserted by the Brazilian federal tax authorities in prior fiscal years, tax authorities from the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo have asserted similar claims on the same legal basis in prior fiscal years. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Brazilian federal tax authorities asserted an additional claim against the Company's Brazilian subsidiary based on a theory of joint liability with respect to an alleged underpayment of income taxes, social taxes, interest, and penalties by a Brazilian distributor.

The asserted claims by Brazilian federal tax authorities are for calendar years 2003 through 2008, and the asserted claims by the tax authorities from the state of Sao Paulo, are for calendar years 2005 through 2007. The total asserted claims by Brazilian state and federal tax authorities aggregate to approximately $426 million for the alleged evasion of import and other taxes, approximately $1.1 billion for interest, and approximately $1.9 billion for various penalties, all determined using an exchange rate as of January 26, 2013. The Company has completed a thorough review of the matters and believes the asserted claims against the Company's Brazilian subsidiary are without merit, and the Company is defending the claims vigorously. While the Company believes there is no legal basis for the alleged liability, due to the complexities and uncertainty surrounding the judicial process in Brazil and the nature of the claims asserting joint liability with the importer, the Company is unable to determine the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome against its Brazilian subsidiary and is unable to reasonably estimate a range of loss, if any. The Company does not expect a final judicial determination for several years.

On March 31, 2011 and April 12, 2011, purported shareholder class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and certain of its officers and directors. The lawsuits have been consolidated, and an amended consolidated complaint was filed on December 2, 2011. The consolidated action is purportedly brought on behalf of purchasers of the Company's publicly traded securities between February 3, 2010 and May 11, 2011. Plaintiffs allege that defendants made false and misleading statements, purport to assert claims for violations of the federal securities laws, and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief. The Company believes the claims are without merit and intends to defend the actions vigorously. While the Company believes there is no legal basis for liability, due to the uncertainty surrounding the litigation process, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate a range of loss, if any, at this time.

Beginning on April 8, 2011, a number of purported shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in both the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and the California Superior Court for the County of Santa Clara against the Company's Board of Directors and several of its officers. The federal lawsuits have been consolidated in the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs in both the federal and state derivative actions allege that the Board allowed certain officers to make allegedly false and misleading statements. The complaint includes claims for violation of the federal securities laws, breach of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, and violations of the California Corporations Code. The complaint seeks compensatory damages, disgorgement, and other relief.

The Company is subject to patent claims asserted by VirnetX, Inc. on August 11, 2010 in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. VirnetX alleges that various Cisco products that implement a method for secure communication using virtual private networks infringe certain patents. VirnetX seeks monetary damages. The trial on these claims is scheduled to begin in March 2013. The Company believes that it has strong arguments that its products do not use the technology described in the patents and that the patents are invalid. If the jury were to find that Cisco's products infringe and find that the patents are not invalid, the Company believes that damages, as appropriately measured, would not be material given the limited contribution played by the alleged patented technology. However, due to the uncertainty surrounding the litigation process, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate outcome of this litigation at this time.

The Company and a service provider customer are subject to patent claims asserted by TiVo, Inc. on June 4, 2012 in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. TiVo alleges that the Company's digital video recorders deployed by the service provider customer infringe certain of its patents. TiVo seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief. The trial on these claims is scheduled to begin in March 2014. The Company intends to show at trial that its products do not use the technology described in the patents.

TiVo previously filed a similar patent lawsuit against the same service provider customer, accusing digital video recorders manufactured by one of the Company's competitors. The outcome of that case, which is scheduled for trial in May 2013, could have an impact on the timing and outcome of the Company's case. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the litigation process, which involves numerous defendants, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate outcome of this litigation at this time.

In addition, the Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, including intellectual property litigation. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, the Company does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.