XML 28 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Equity Method Investments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures [Abstract]  
Equity Method Investments
Equity Method Investments
The Company has two equity method investments, Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC (Constitution) and Meade Pipeline Co LLC (Meade), which are further described below. Activity related to these equity method investments is as follows:
 
 
Constitution
 
Meade
 
Total
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
96,850

 
$
90,345

 
$
64,268

 
$
32,674

 
$
13,172

 
$
3,761

 
$
129,524

 
$
103,517

 
$
68,029

Contributions
 
4,350

 
8,975

 
19,625

 
52,689

 
19,509

 
9,448

 
57,039

 
28,484

 
29,073

Earnings (loss) on equity method investments
 
(100,468
)
 
(2,470
)
 
6,452

 
(18
)
 
(7
)
 
(37
)
 
(100,486
)
 
(2,477
)
 
6,415

Balance at end of period
 
$
732

 
$
96,850

 
$
90,345

 
$
85,345

 
$
32,674

 
$
13,172

 
$
86,077

 
$
129,524

 
$
103,517


Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
In April 2012, the Company acquired a 25% equity interest in Constitution, which was formed to develop, construct and operate a 124-mile large diameter pipeline to transport natural gas from northeast Pennsylvania to both the New England and New York markets. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to invest its proportionate share of costs associated with the development and construction of the pipeline and related facilities, subject to a contribution cap of $250 million.
On April 22, 2016, Constitution announced that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) denied Constitution's application for a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (Certification) for the New York State portion of its proposed 124-mile route. In early 2016, Constitution filed legal actions in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York challenging the legality and appropriateness of the NYSDEC’s decision. On March 16, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York issued an order ruling, without prejudice, that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear Constitution’s complaint. On August 18, 2017, the Second Circuit issued a decision denying in part and dismissing in part Constitution’s appeal.  The Second Circuit determined that it lacked jurisdiction to address Constitution’s argument that the NYSDEC waived its ability to issue a Certification by unreasonably delaying action on Constitution's application.  Instead, the Second Circuit found that jurisdiction over the waiver issue lies exclusively with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.  The Second Circuit, however, rejected Constitution’s assertion that the denial of the Certification by the NYSDEC was “arbitrary and capricious” and denied Constitution’s complaint in that regard. On October 11, 2017, Constitution filed a petition for a declaratory order requesting the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to find that, by operation of law, the Section 401 Water Quality Certification requirement for the New York State portion of the pipeline project was waived due to the failure of the NYSDEC to act on Constitution’s application within a reasonable period of time, as required by the Clean Water Act. On January 11, 2018, the FERC denied Constitution’s petition. On January 16, 2018, Constitution petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, asserting that the Second Circuit’s decision conflicts with the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court and federal Courts of Appeals on an important question of federal law. The U.S. Supreme Court has not yet determined if it will hear the case. On February 12, 2018, Constitution filed a rehearing request with the FERC of its findings that the NYSDEC did not waive the Section 401 Water Quality Certification requirement. The FERC has not yet ruled on the rehearing.
Constitution stated that it remains committed to pursuing the project and that it intends to pursue all available options to challenge the NYSDEC’s decision. In light of the current status of the remaining litigation and regulatory challenges, Constitution is unable to reasonably estimate its target in-service date.
The Company evaluated its investment in Constitution for other than temporary impairment (OTTI) as of December 31, 2017. The Company’s evaluation considered various factors, including but not limited to prior FERC approval and the related economic viability of the project, the other members’ continued commitment to the project and the recent legal and regulatory actions. In light of the recent actions taken by the courts and regulators to uphold the NYDEC’s denial of the certification and the Company's estimation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome associated with the remaining legal and regulatory challenges, the Company recorded an OTTI of $95.9 million in December 2017, reducing its investment in Constitution to its estimated fair value. Fair value was determined using a market approach. The Company will continue to monitor the carrying value of its investment as required. As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s carrying value of its investment in Constitution is less than its proportionate share of Constitution’s net assets by $95.9 million. This basis difference is due to the Company’s recent impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017 and relates entirely to the pipeline assets of Constitution. The Company expects to amortize this basis difference once the related assets of Constitution are placed in service, which may or may not occur, depending on the outcome of the legal and regulatory process.
At this time, the Company remains committed to funding the project in an amount in proportion to its ownership interest for the duration of the remaining legal and regulatory challenges and if successful, the development and construction of the new pipeline.
Meade Pipeline Co LLC
In February 2014, the Company acquired a 20% equity interest in Meade, which was formed to participate in the development and construction of a 177-mile pipeline (Central Penn Line) that will transport natural gas from Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania to an interconnect with Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC’s (Transco) mainline in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The new pipeline will be constructed and operated by Transco and will be owned by Transco and Meade in proportion to their respective ownership percentages of approximately 61% and 39%, respectively. Under the terms of the Meade LLC agreement, the Company agreed to invest its proportionate share of Meade’s anticipated costs associated with the new pipeline. The Company expects to contribute approximately $75.0 million over the next two years. By order issued on February 3, 2017, the FERC issued Transco a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing the construction of the new pipeline. The in-service date for the new pipeline is expected to be mid-2018.