![]() |
|
Richard L Solomons
CFO & Head of Commercial Development & CEO Designate
|
Broadwater Park
Denham
Buckinghamshire, UB9 5HR
Tel: +44(0)1895 512456
Fax: +44(0)1895 512471
Richard.Solomons@ihg.com
|
1.
|
It appears that you have recorded a litigation provision of $22 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Per review of Footnote 7 to your March 31, 2011 financial statements included in Form 6-K filed on May 10, 2011, it appears you recorded an additional $22 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Please clarify for us if you recorded a $22 million provision in both periods. If provisions were recorded in both periods, please tell us the facts and circumstances that led to the additional provision during the first quarter 2011.
|
|
The facts and circumstances that resulted in the same litigation provision appearing in the two filings are as follows:
|
(i)
|
On February 23, 2011, the Group received an unfavourable court ruling which resulted in a $22 million award to the plaintiff in the litigation. The Group has appealed this award and is awaiting a ruling on the appeal. Prior to the February 23 ruling, the Directors’ best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the claim was significantly less than $22 million. The Group’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 were issued to the UK listing authorities on February 14, 2011 which was before the court’s ruling.
|
(ii)
|
On April 11, 2011, the Group’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 were authorised by the Directors for filing on Form 20-F. For the purposes of these financial statements, the events of February 23 constituted an adjusting post balance sheet event in accordance with IAS 10 ‘Events after the Reporting Period’ as the court ruling provided additional evidence of conditions that existed at December 31, 2010. As a consequence, the Form 20-F financial statements included the $22 million litigation provision in accordance with IAS 37 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets’, reflecting an update of the Directors’ best estimate of the amount required to settle the litigation.
|
(iii)
|
On May 10, 2011, the Group’s financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were authorised by the Directors for issue to the UK listing authorities. As the December 31, 2010 financial statements issued to the UK listing authorities did not reflect the outcome of the court ruling due to the timing of their authorisation, the $22 million litigation provision required recognition in the results for the three months ended March 31, 2011. These were the financial statements that were attached to the Form 6-K furnished with the SEC on May 10, 2011.
|
·
|
the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings;
|
·
|
staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and
|
·
|
the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
|